It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Erebus volcano, Antarctica, with its persistent phonolite lava lake, is a classic example of an evolved, CO2-rich rift volcano. Seismic studies provide limited images of the magmatic system. Here we show using magnetotelluric data that a steep, melt-related conduit of low electrical resistivity originating in the upper mantle undergoes pronounced lateral re-orientation in the deep crust before reaching shallower magmatic storage and the summit lava lake. The lateral turn represents a structural fault-valve controlling episodic flow of magma and CO2 vapour, which replenish and heat the high level phonolite differentiation zone. This magmatic valve lies within an inferred, east-west structural trend forming part of an accommodation zone across the southern termination of the Terror Rift, providing a dilatant magma pathway. Unlike H2O-rich subduction arc volcanoes, CO2-dominated Erebus geophysically shows continuous magmatic structure to shallow crustal depths of < 1 km, as the melt does not experience decompression-related volatile supersaturation and viscous stalling.
Episodic magma eruption and CO2 release to the atmosphere are controlled where two structural trends meet to cause dilatancy.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Canterbury, Gateway Antarctica, Christchurch, New Zealand (GRID:grid.21006.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 4063); Czech Academy of Science, Institute of Geophysics, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316)
2 University of Utah, Energy & Geoscience Institute, Salt Lake City, USA (GRID:grid.223827.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 0096)
3 Numeric Resources LLC, Salt Lake City, USA (GRID:grid.223827.e)
4 University of Alberta, Department of Physics, Edmonton, Canada (GRID:grid.17089.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 316X)
5 United States Geological Survey, Denver, USA (GRID:grid.2865.9) (ISNI:0000000121546924)
6 University of Hawaii at Manoa, Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, Honolulu, USA (GRID:grid.410445.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 0957)
7 First Light Mountain Guides, Chamonix, France (GRID:grid.410445.0); University of Lausanne, Department of Earth Science, Lausanne, Switzerland (GRID:grid.9851.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2165 4204)
8 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Volcanic Fluid Research Centre, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)
9 New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, USA (GRID:grid.39679.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 0724 9501)