Abstract

This case note analyses the judgment issued by the European Court of Human Rights on 7 May 2021 in Application No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland. In this judgment, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the participation of an unlawfully elected person on the panel of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that discontinued proceedings on the constitutional complaint filed by a private applicant led to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The Strasbourg Court’s judgment is of fundamental importance for several reasons. First, it clarified the scope of applicability of Article 6 to constitutional courts and contributed to the Court’s case law on the right to a tribunal established by law, which has been developing rapidly since the landmark ruling in Ástráðsson v Iceland.

Details

Title
The Polish Constitutional Tribunal Crisis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights
Author
Szwed, Marcin 1 

 Assistant Professor at the University of Warsaw 
Pages
132-154
Section
Case Notes
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Mar 2022
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
ISSN
15740196
e-ISSN
17445515
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2671903717
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Constitutional Law Review. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content