1. Introduction
With the improvement of biomedical research and clinical care, the survival of patients with childhood cancer has increased. The quality of life after cancer has therefore become a major issue in the management of these patients. Oncological treatments are mainly based on chemo- and radiotherapy, the gonadotoxicity of which can lead to gonadal dysfunction and infertility [1]. To preserve the future fertility of prepubertal boys, cryopreservation procedures of immature testicular fragments containing spermatogonial stem cells (SSC) have been developed [2]. Several fertility restoration approaches have also started to emerge [3] and are currently the object of research, such as (i) in vitro maturation in 3D cultures [4,5] or in organotypic cultures [6,7,8], and (ii) in vivo maturation by testicular tissue grafting [9,10] or SSC transplantation [11,12]. Among these different strategies, organotypic culture presents the advantage of maintaining the tissue architecture and cellular interactions that are necessary for germ cell maturation, as well as avoiding the potential reintroduction of residual tumour cells in cured patients. Using this approach, fertilizing spermatozoa have been obtained in vitro from mouse prepubertal testes [6,8]. The further development and optimization of organotypic culture procedures in animal models is essential before a human application can be envisaged. The rat model, the spermatogenesis of which has a duration that is intermediate between mice and humans (53 days vs. 36 and 74 days), and shows (as in humans) a germ cell maturation arrest in organotypic cultures [13,14,15,16,17,18], appears to be a relevant model for the improvement of in vitro culture conditions.
Spermatogenesis is an essential process by which haploid spermatozoa develop from SSC in the seminiferous tubules of the testis. Meiosis is the step during which genetic recombinations occur in diploid spermatocytes and, at the end of which, haploid spermatids are generated. A single round of DNA replication is followed by two consecutive rounds of nuclear meiotic divisions. The first meiotic division (meiosis I) is characterized by a prolonged prophase during which chromosome synapsis, crossovers, and homologous recombination take place [19], and by the segregation of homologous chromosomes. Synapsis and recombinations occur following the formation of a proteinaceous structure between the homologous chromosomes, called the synaptonemal complex [20]. Homologous recombinations require the generation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Most of the generated DSBs are involved in chromosome pairing and alignment [19,21]. The repair of DSBs is essential for stable homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis during prophase [22,23]. During meiosis II, sister chromatids separate within two haploid daughter cells.
Meiosis is therefore a complex process involving many genes, and the deregulation of its expression can be at the origin of meiotic arrest, as demonstrated in transgenic mice [24,25]. Numerous studies have investigated the causes of meiotic arrests in a fundamental or purely medical context [26,27,28,29]. Consequently, the development of high-throughput sequencing has led to the identification of several genes involved in male infertility [30]. Meiotic arrest could be due to chromosome abnormality, such as Y microdeletion or aneuploidy, or to gene mutations. For instance, a splice site mutation of the SYCE1 gene (encoding for Synaptonemal complex central element protein 1) leads to the disruption of synapsis in mice [31]. Some studies have highlighted the involvement of different checkpoints in cases of maturation arrest [32,33]. These checkpoints, such as the pachytene checkpoint, perform a fundamental role in meiotic progression. The pachytene checkpoint is involved in the repair of DSBs induced during meiotic recombination, and in the detection of asynapsis. It informs the cell of the persistence of DSBs on asynapsed chromosome fragments. Autosome asynapsis leads to a defect in sex chromosome inactivation and cell apoptosis [34]. It appears that mutations of genes involved in synapsis or silencing of sex chromosomes can induce an arrest of the cell cycle/meiosis at different stages [35,36]. However, chromosome and genetic alterations are not the only causes of meiotic arrests. Because spermatogenesis is finely regulated by different factors such as nutrients, temperature, and hormones, abrupt changes in the environment can affect its progression [37,38,39]. Indeed, an early deprivation of vitamin A in prepubertal mice leads to a disruption of the blood-testis barrier (BTB), an arrest in meiosis, and germ cell apoptosis [40,41]. In cases of cryptorchidism in humans, the maintenance of germ cells at body temperature induces the appearance of mutations, leading to germ cell alterations, testicular germ cell tumor formation, and progressive germ cell depletion [42]. Similarly, disruption of the androgen signaling pathway has been shown to lead to germ cell loss [43,44] or to azoospermia [45,46,47].
Our previous findings concerning in vitro maturation of prepubertal rat testicular tissue evidenced a blockage during meiosis I [16], as is also reported in human prepubertal testicular tissue [13]. The identification of gene sets or pathways that are specifically deregulated in vitro would contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in meiotic blockage, and consequently improve the in vitro maturation up to haploid germ cells. Transcriptomic approaches have proven to be useful in highlighting the downregulation of genes involved in the control of cell cycles such as Igf-1 [48], or upregulation of genes related to immune response and the NFκB signaling pathway [49] in cultures of mouse prepubertal testes. Supplementations of culture media with IGF-1 [48] or an inhibitor of the TLR4-NFκB signaling pathway [49] led to a significant increase in the sperm yield and a reduction in the activation of macrophages, respectively. In addition, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis has facilitated the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between in vitro and in vivo matured mouse ovarian tissues, thereby enabling the optimization of culture conditions and the successful completion of in vitro oogenesis [50].
The aim of the present study was therefore to understand the underlying mechanisms of meiotic arrest in organotypic cultures of prepubertal rat testicular tissue, using histological analyses and a bulk transcriptomic approach.
2. Results
2.1. Pre-Meiotic and Meiotic Germ Cells Survive in Cultured Prepubertal Rat Testicular Tissue but Do Not Achieve Their Differentiation
As previously described [16], rat prepubertal testicular tissues were cultured on agarose gels for 28 days (D28), at which time round spermatids should be present in seminiferous tubules. In order to characterize and identify the origin of the meiotic arrest in in vitro cultured rat prepubertal testicular tissues, histological and immunohistochemical analyses were first performed and compared to age-matched in vivo controls (36.5 dpp) and prepubertal in vivo controls (14.5 dpp). In seminiferous tubule sections of in vivo rat testes, all the expected stages of spermatogenesis were observed, with meiotic germ cells present in the adluminal compartment of seminiferous tubules at 36.5 dpp. (Figure 1a,b). In sections of the D28 cultured tissues, an early meiotic arrest at the spermatocyte I stage was observed. The tubules remained quite empty and few spermatocytes I were observed (Figure 1a,b). The immunolabeling of DDX4, a protein expressed in the germline and involved in germline integrity, confirmed that the germ cell content was decreased after organotypic culture, with the presence of Sertoli cell-only tubules and a decrease in the germ cells/Sertoli cells ratio compared to age-matched in vivo controls. While a lower number of germ cells per tubule was observed in cultured tissues compared to the age-matched control, the number of Sertoli cells per tubule was similar between the two conditions (Figure 1c,f, Figure S1a–c,f). In cultured tissues, the nuclei of some germ cells appeared pyknotic. However, the germ cells/Sertoli cells ratios were similar between D28 cultured tissues and 14.5 dpp immature testes (Figure 1d, Figure S1a–c).
We next determined whether germ cell depletion in cultured tissues was the result of a decrease in proliferation or an increase in DNA damage. Ki67 immunostaining revealed that the proliferative activity of intratubular cells was maintained at the end of the culture process (Figure 1e,f, Figure S1g). The proliferative activity in D28 cultured tissues was closer to that of the immature 14.5 dpp tissues compared to the age-matched 36.5 dpp controls, suggesting that an impairment of tissue maturation may be a possible cause of the meiotic arrest. To evaluate the DNA integrity of the produced spermatocytes, we combined a TUNEL assay with SYCP3 immunostaining. As expected, an increased proportion of intratubular cells with fragmented DNA (TUNEL positive) was detected in cultured tissues, partially due to the culture conditions (Figure 1g,h). However, the proportion of tubules containing TUNEL-positive spermatocytes at D28 was not different from in vivo controls (Figure 1i). DSBs repair defects could lead to cell death [51]. However, the percentage of spermatocytes with DNA fragmentation was below 0.2% in cultured tissues (Figure S1d), which is insufficient to explain the cell maturation arrest.
The formation of the XY body was then assessed by immunolabeling γH2AX, a protein involved in DSBs and transcriptional silencing of the XY body, on tissue sections (Figure 1j). When physiologically expressed, γH2AX is present at the zygotene stage on the chromosomal asynapsis region, whereas it becomes restricted and highly expressed in the XY body at the pachytene stage [52]. In D28 cultured tissues, arrested spermatocytes displayed an indistinguishable XY body and dispersed γH2AX staining within the nuclei, around the chromosomes (Figure 1j). To confirm this histological observation, meiotic chromosome spreads were prepared from D28 cultured tissues and age-matched in vivo controls. Using confocal microscopy, we found a γH2AX-positive XY body and a significantly higher number of γH2AX foci in the pachytene spermatocytes generated in vitro, which were localized on the chromosome axes, in comparison to the unique γH2AX-positive XY body detected in pachytene spermatocytes in vivo (Figure 2a,c, Videos S1, S2). Since the γH2AX increase could be due to asynapsis or the absence of DSBs repair [51], the integrity of the synaptonemal complex was investigated by performing double SYCP3/SYCP1 immunostaining. As previously hypothesized, asynapsis could be observed in many spermatocytes generated during culture, while some of them seemed to be correctly synapsed (Figure 2b,c, Videos S3, S4). An extensive absence of DSBs repair associated with a high level of asynapsis has previously been shown to be sufficient to induce the early apoptosis of pachytene spermatocytes [34].
2.2. In Vitro- and In Vivo-Matured Prepubertal Testicular Tissues Have Distinct Transcriptomic Profiles
In order to identify the molecular mechanisms involved in the spermatogenic arrest during organotypic culture, bulk RNA sequencing analyses were conducted on in vitro- and in vivo-matured testicular tissues. For each time point, three replicates were analysed, with three different testes for in vivo controls and twelve pooled cultured explants per replicate for the in vitro conditions. One 14.5 dpp testicular tissue, which displayed a different transcriptomic profile compared to the other two replicates, was excluded from the downstream analyses.
A PCA (Principal Component Analysis) revealed the biological relevance of the resulting transcriptomic dataset: indeed, the first component (or dimension), containing 84.8% of variances, appeared strongly correlated with the tissue maturity of samples (Figure 3a). Indeed, in vivo samples at each developmental stage (24.5, 30.5, 36.5 and 53.5 dpp) clustered together, whereas immature 14.5 dpp tissues clustered with all the in vitro-cultured tissues (D6, D16, D22, D28). A more precise analysis showed that, in this last cluster, 14.5 dpp tissues clustered away from cultured explants (Dimension 1, 52.4% of variance), demonstrating a persistent difference between in vivo- and in vitro-matured testicular tissues (Figure 3b). The analysis of DEGs confirmed the differences between in vivo and in vitro conditions from the outset of the first wave of spermatogenesis (Figure S2).
Based on the above PCA and on histological observations, we compared the transcriptomes of cultured tissues to those of 14.5 dpp tissues to highlight the genes involved in the initiation of germ cell maturation which could be deregulated during cultures, thereby leading to premature spermatogenic arrest (Figure 3c). By applying stringent selection parameters, we were able to highlight 1240 DEGs (differentially expressed genes), among which 600 were deregulated in each comparison (Figure 3c, Table S1). A clustering analysis on the resulting set of genes allowed us to generate seven expression patterns (termed P1–7), which can be organized into two broad clusters, P1–P4 and P5–P7, regrouped due to their extremely broad expression profiles (Figure 3d, Table S1): cluster P1–4 corresponds to 215 genes transiently expressed in the testis during its maturation and predominantly down-regulated in cultured tissues, and cluster P5–7 corresponds to 385 genes poorly expressed during the maturation process but up-regulated in cultured tissues (Figure 3d, Table S1).
2.3. The Functional Analysis Revealed Associations with Specific Biological Processes
In order to investigate the molecular pathways involved in this defective maturation process, we performed a functional analysis, based on a GO (gene ontology) enrichment, on the seven resulting expression patterns. This functional analysis highlighted 1056 enriched GO terms (Table S2) significantly associated with the P1–4 and P5–7 patterns, among which 35 biological processes have been selected for representation (Figure 4). Out of the 215 genes belonging to the P1–4 pattern, 42 are involved in reproductive processes (p value < 4.58 × 106), 56 in the cell cycle (4.13 × 1025), and 58 in cell differentiation (0.037) (Figure 4). The P1–4 pattern was also found to be enriched in genes involved in chromosome segregation (number of genes = 29, p value < 9.23 × 1018) and cell cycle checkpoints (11, 0.0002), as well as in genes involved in metaphase/anaphase transition (7, 0.0002) (Figure 4), reflecting the clear defect in synaptonemal complex organization. The 385 genes downregulated in in vivo controls and gradually upregulated during the culture process (pattern P5–7) (Figure 4) appeared to be mainly involved in general mechanisms such as tissue development (66, 7.97 × 107), cell development (52, 0.007), cell death (71, 6.24 × 108), stress (110, 4.52 × 109), or inflammation (16, 0.007) (Figure 4). Interestingly, more specific terms which may influence spermatogenesis are also enriched. Indeed, due to the culture condition, explants were exposed to a more harmful environment than under physiological conditions, with direct exposure to oxygen, and thus to oxidative stress. This was reflected by a significant association with the oxygen level GO term (26, 3.30 × 105) (Figure 4). Additionally, genes whose expression could be affected by the culture medium and its supplementation were enriched for gene sets involved in nutrient level (32, 0.0003) and response to hormonal stimulation (54, 2.10 × 107), as well as growth factors (26, 0.0008) (Figure 4). A KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway analysis confirmed the involvement of the cell cycle (11, 1.98 × 105), but also of the reproductive (oocyte meiosis—8, 0.003; progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation—7, 0.004) and immune system (TNF signaling—11, 7.17 × 104; cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction—16, 0.001) signaling pathways (Table S2).
By exploring these gene sets with a manual bibliography, we identified 102 genes clearly related to spermatogenesis and/or SSC maintenance. Among them, 51 belong to the pattern P1–4 and 51 to the pattern P5–7 (Table 1, Table S3). The top 15 most differentially expressed genes (according to their adjusted F-values) associated with spermatogenesis were Cyp17a1, Insl3, Tesk1, Cdc34, Kif11, Ube2c, Incenp, Plk1, Ccnf, Cks2, Alox15, Bub1b, Ccna2, Cbx2, and Aspm for the pattern P1–4 (Table 1), and Mmp9, Vldlr, Nr1d1, Igfbp3, Cxcl10, Abca1, Fstl3, Wnt4, Cd14, Ctsh, Stat3, Cx3cl1, Kdr, Srebf1, and Tf for the pattern P5–7 (Table 1). At least 43 out of the 102 genes related to gametogenesis were expressed in spermatocytes, which included 6 genes (Cbx2, Sohlh2, Tex12, Trip13, Plk1, and Plk2) related to the synaptonemal complex. Most of them were down-regulated in cultured tissues, and may be related to the synapsis defect observed in vitro (Table 1, Table S3). Moreover, genes involved in DSBs and crossover formation (Top2a, Eme1, Trip13, and Bard1) were down-regulated (Table 1, Table S3). These gene expression patterns were consistent with our previous observations. In addition, numerous genes related to inflammation and stress response pathways were deregulated, such as Cxcl10, Cd14, Cx3cl1, Alox15, Ccl2, Ccl5, Socs3, and Fcgr3a (Table 1, Table S3). The immunological response of the testicular tissue is extremely important for its protection but, in some cases, could induce immunological infertility [53,54]. The recruitment of immune cells by the interstitium appeared to be extremely stimulated under our culture conditions (Table 1, Table S3). Additionally, some genes involved in tissue growth and tissue homeostasis were upregulated (Srebf1, Slc2a1, Igf2, and Igfbp3), reflecting the beginning of testicular maturation (Table 1, Table S3). An overexpression of genes involved in the reorganization of the BTB junctions (Icam1, Ctsl, Mmp9, Mmp2, and Spp1), which are essential for spermatogenic differentiation [55], was also noticed (Table 1, Table S3). Additionally, we observed a significant down-regulation of transcripts encoding key steroidogenic enzymes (Cyp17a1, Cyp11a1, and Hsd3b1) in cultured tissues (Table 1, Table S3). Other genes involved in the regulation of steroidogenesis (Shbg, Pdpn, Lpar1, Apoe, Adrb1, Igfbp3, Adm, Hsd11b1, Ngfr, and Nr1d1) were up-regulated (Table 1, Table S3). Finally, at least 52 genes out of 102 are involved in cell cycle processes, such as SSC self-renewal (Ccna2, Igf2, Epha2), spindle organization and chromosomal segregation (Kif11, Aspm, Cdca2, Haus7), cell cycle checkpoints (Ube2c, Incenp, Plk1, Bub1b), or meiotic entry (Vldlr, Nr1d1, Rbp1) (Table 1, Table S3).
The expression pattern of selected spermatogenesis-related genes was confirmed for the most part in 14.5 dpp testes and cultured explants by RT-qPCR. Indeed, our data showed a significant decrease in Cbx2, Cks2, Top2a, and Ube2c mRNA levels during the culture period (Figure S3). As is consistent with RNA-seq data, similar Dlk1 mRNA levels were found in 14.5 dpp and in vitro cultured tissues, whereas Ngfr mRNA levels were deregulated in organotypic cultures (Figure S3). However, differences in Bub1b and Sohlh2 mRNA levels were observed between RNA-seq and RT-qPCR analyses (Figure S3).
2.4. Impaired BTB Formation Could Impede Meiotic Progression
We then chose to investigate BTB formation and steroidogenesis during organotypic cultures, since several genes involved in these biological processes were deregulated in vitro. To assess the establishment and integrity of the BTB in cultured tissues, testicular fragments were incubated with a biotin tracer supposed to be stopped at the level of the BTB and not to diffuse within the adluminal compartment of seminiferous tubules. Our kinetic analyses show the presence of this tracer throughout the seminiferous epithelium in all the tubules examined, thereby showing an impairment of BTB establishment that could impede meiosis (Figure 5). On the contrary, in cultures of mouse prepubertal testicular tissues [153], the same analyses revealed a good preservation of BTB integrity.
Steroidogenesis was then examined by first analysing the expression of both 3βHSD and CYP17A1 by western blot and immunofluorescence. Interestingly, the expression of these two steroidogenic enzymes was undetectable at D28, contrary to the age-matched in vivo control (Figure 6a,b,d). Testosterone levels were measured within cultured testicular fragments and culture media using LC-MS/MS. They first dropped and then slowly decreased during the culture (Figure 6f,g). The levels found in testicular fragments between D16 and D28 are slightly above the physiological levels (Figure 6f). However, a weak expression of the androgen receptor (AR) was observed at D28 (Figure 6c,e). One can therefore speculate that the decrease in AR, which mediates the action of testosterone, might affect BTB formation during the first wave of in vitro spermatogenesis [154].
2.5. The In Vitro Spermatogenesis Process May Be Associated with an Inflammatory Process
To identify a potential common regulator of these deregulated genes, the upstream regulator tool from Ingenuity Pathway Analyses (IPA) software was used. IPA analyses clearly demonstrated that zinc finger and BTB domains containing 17 (ZBTB17), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (CEBPB) were the top three predicted upstream regulators of the 594 deregulated genes between 14.5 dpp and D28 cultured tissues, among the 600 candidate genes (Figure 7a, Table S4). Most of the top 10 predicted upstream regulators were involved in inflammatory processes or immune cell recruitment. We hypothesized that the maturation arrest observed in vitro could be associated with a strong response of the local inflammatory system, probably generated by the resident macrophages, as previously described in cultures of mouse prepubertal testicular tissues [49]. To test this hypothesis, tissue cultures were supplemented for 28 days with anti-inflammatory molecules. The analysis of the progression of spermatogenesis shows no germ cell differentiation beyond the spermatocyte I stage, whatever the molecule added into the culture medium (Figure 7b). Moreover, none of the molecules tested were efficient in significantly increasing the percentage of seminiferous tubules containing spermatocytes I, especially genistein, which not only alters meiotic progression but also tissue architecture at the highest concentration used (Figure 7b). The molecules tested also failed to decrease the macrophage population, since the CD68+ surface area was not significantly different between the conditions (Figure 7c).
3. Discussion
The current study explored the in vitro maturation of rat prepubertal testicular tissues at the molecular level in order to unravel the mechanisms underlying meiotic arrest. Indeed, although organotypic culture at a gas–liquid interphase has proven to be a promising approach for generating spermatozoa from immature testicular tissues in the mouse model, a complete in vitro spermatogenesis has not yet been achieved in other species, including rats and humans, thereby delaying its application in clinics for fertility restoration of survivors of childhood cancer.
Consistently with our previous findings [16], no germ cells beyond the spermatocyte I stage were observed in rat organotypic cultures. In vitro cultured tissues were analysed at D28 (corresponding in vivo to 36.5 dpp), at which time round spermatids should be physiologically detected in seminiferous tubules. The proliferative activity of intratubular cells was maintained under the culture conditions. However, because of the meiotic blockage, a significant decrease in germ cell content was found within seminiferous tubules compared to age-matched in vivo controls. Although more tubules showed DNA fragmentation when comparing in vitro to in vivo conditions, few pachytene spermatocytes were TUNEL positive, suggesting that apoptosis occurred after this stage. Two previous studies have reported that round spermatids could be obtained after in vitro maturation of rat prepubertal testes, albeit in very small proportions [14,15].
Two distinct types of meiotic arrest have been described in humans [155]: (i) arrested spermatocytes are characterized by the absence of a discernible XY body and a dispersed γH2AX nuclear staining, or (ii) arrested spermatocytes display normal features, i.e., the presence of an XY body displaying γH2AX staining. Here, the arrested rat spermatocytes displayed a γH2AX-positive XY body and numerous γH2AX-positive foci along the chromosomes, reflecting an increase in DSBs and/or asynapsis. Moreover, the cytological analyses of the rat spermatocytes generated in vitro revealed a disorganization of synaptonemal complexes and asynapsis, which is known to induce a defect in the recruitment of ATR and BRCA1, thereby leading to a defective inactivation of XY chromosomes, and to apoptosis [34]. It would be interesting to explore the expression of key proteins involved in DSBs formation and repair processes, such as RAD51, BRCA1, and DMC1, to characterize more precisely the maturation arrest phenotype.
Meiotic arrest can have a genetic [156,157] or an environmental [158,159] origin. In order to overcome maturation arrest, it is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms that are deregulated during in vitro culture. Interestingly, our bulk RNA-Seq analyses revealed that D16, D22, and D28 cultured tissues showed immature features, with transcriptomic profiles close to 14.5 dpp in vivo controls. A total of 600 DEGs were identified between in vitro- and in vivo-matured testicular tissues. Using gene ontology analyses, different GO terms in relation with spermatogenesis, BTB, steroidogenesis, and synaptonemal complex were highlighted. The assessment of BTB functionality revealed its permeability in rat organotypic cultures, contrary to what was observed in cultured prepubertal mouse explants [153]. The analysis of proteins involved in BTB structure (i.e., OCLN, ZO-1) and regulation (i.e., SRC, FAK) will have to be investigated in future studies. Since BTB’s primary function is to maintain an immunological sanctuary inside the seminiferous tubules, its dysfunction has been shown to cause immunological damage, impede meiosis [55,160], and contribute to infertility [54]. The assessment of steroidogenesis first unveiled the absence of expression of the two steroidogenic enzymes 3βHSD and CYP17A1 at D28. The slightly elevated intratesticular levels observed between D16 and D28, which could arise from the lack of a functional vascular system in vitro, is unlikely to be the cause of the meiotic arrest. However, the decreased expression of AR, which mediates testosterone signaling, could explain this meiotic blockage. Indeed, impaired androgen signaling has previously been shown to disrupt BTB formation and integrity [154,161,162], to interfere with the assembly of the synaptonemal complex [163], and to induce meiotic arrest [46,47,164].
Then, IPA analyses performed on our dataset led to the identification of predictive upstream regulators. We found that the top 10 upstream regulators were involved in inflammation and in regulation of spermatogenesis. Among them, TNFα is partly produced by macrophages to promote the inflammatory process, and its expression is accompanied by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or chemokines [165]. In addition, TNFα has been shown to be activated by the NF-κB signaling pathway, which contributes to immune cell survival and proliferation, followed by the production of various cytokines [166]. These results are consistent with a recent transcriptomic analysis that revealed the presence of a drastic and overwhelming immune reaction involving the TLR4-NF-κB signaling pathway in cultures of prepubertal mouse testicular tissues [49]. Moreover, we have previously shown that cytoplasmic and nuclear ROS are generated in in vitro cultured mouse testes [167]. Cytokines such as TNFα have also been shown to regulate BTB permeability by restructuring gap junctions [168,169,170], as well as the steroidogenic function of Leydig cells [171,172,173]. As mentioned earlier, an altered BTB integrity, a downregulation of steroidogenic genes (Cyp11a1, Cyp17a1, Hsd3b1), and a depletion in CYP17A1 and 3βHSD were evidenced in organotypic cultures in the current study. We therefore assessed the effect of three molecules with anti-inflammatory properties (TAK 242, infliximab, genistein) on spermatogenic progression in organotypic cultures. Among them, TAK 242, a TLR4-NF-κB signaling pathway inhibitor, has previously been used to successfully decrease the number of testicular macrophages in cultures of mouse prepubertal testicular tissues [49]. Interestingly, our IPA analysis predicted at least six regulators (ZBTB17, TNF, CEBPB, TP53, FOXM1, and NR1H3) that interact with the TNFα-NF-κB signaling pathway [174,175,176,177,178,179]. However, the three molecules tested, including TAK 242, failed to promote meiotic progression and to reduce the macrophage population in cultures of rat tissues, at all concentrations tested. By testing molecules that inhibit other inflammatory pathways, the in vitro meiotic arrest may be unlocked in the future. In addition, the use of a single-cell RNA-Seq approach will be useful in identifying DEGs in each testicular cell population, and therefore better decipher the molecular mechanisms leading to maturation arrest in spermatocytes during organotypic culture.
In conclusion, through a combination of histological and molecular analyses, we uncovered for the first time several underlying molecular mechanisms that could explain the meiotic arrest observed in cultures of rat prepubertal testicular tissues. Our data converge towards an alteration in BTB integrity, in the steroidogenic pathway, and possibly an inflammatory response. The utilization of the transcriptomic data obtained in this study will be useful to further optimize in vitro tissue maturation protocol, particularly the crucial meiotic step, before considering a clinical application
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Animal Care and Handling
Rats were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled environment, under a 12h light/dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Pubertal and adult rats were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation, whereas pups aged 8.5 dpp were decapitated. In this study, 106 rats were used.
4.2. Animals and Tissue Samples
Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (L’Arbresle, France) and bred in our animal facility. After euthanasia, testes were biopsied and rinsed in αMEM (Gibco Life Technologies, Saint-Aubin, France) at 4 °C. The tunica albuginea was removed with two needles under a binocular magnifier (S8AP0, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
For organotypic cultures, testicular tissues were collected at 8.5 dpp and prepared as described below. For histology and immunohistochemistry, tissues from in vivo controls or from in vitro cultures were fixed at room temperature in Bouin’s fixative solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) or 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). They were then dehydrated in successive ethanol/xylene baths, embedded in paraffin and cut into thin sections (3 µm thick). After two xylene baths, tissue sections were rehydrated in successive descending ethanol baths and plunged into PBS buffer. For immunocytological analyses, cells from in vivo controls or cultured explants were spread onto glass slides. For molecular analyses, the central necrotic area in cultured explants was removed with two thin needles, before being stored in liquid nitrogen.
4.3. Organotypic Cultures
Testicular explants were cultured using the gas–liquid interphase method as described before [16]. Briefly, 8.5 dpp testes were cut into 6 fragments and cultured onto agarose gels (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) in 6-well plates (ThermoFisher Scientific, Saint-Aubin, France). The day before the beginning of each culture, agarose gels were soaked completely in basal medium (αMEM + 0.01% gentamicin) and kept overnight in the incubator [6,16]. Tissues were maintained under 5% CO2–95% air at 34 °C for 6, 16, 22, or 28 days. The culture medium was composed of αMEM supplemented with 10% Knock-out serum replacement (Gibco Life Technologies, Saint-Aubin, France), 10−6 M retinol (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) and 3.4 mM vitamin E (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). To assess the effect of anti-inflammatory molecules, organotypic cultures were supplemented for 28 days with either TAK 242 (1, 10, or 100 µM in DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France), Infliximab (1, 10, or 1000 ng/mL in medium; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) or genistein (0.26, 2.6, and 26 µM in DMSO; Merck-Millipore, Molsheim, France). Cultures supplemented with TAK 242 or genistein were compared to cultures supplemented with DMSO (1, 10 or 100 µL). The media were prepared and replaced every 3–4 days. Juvenile male rats at 14.5, 24.5, 30.5, and 36.5 dpp were used as in vivo controls.
4.4. Histological and Immunohistochemical Analyses
All the antibodies used in this study for immunohistochemical analyses are presented in Table S5. Unless stated otherwise, only the healthy peripheral zone of the cultured testicular explants was taken into consideration for the histological and immunohistochemical analyses.
4.4.1. HES
Hemalun–Eosin–Saffron staining was performed to identify the different meiotic germ cells and division figures [180].
Ki67 and DDX4: To assess cell proliferation (Ki67) and germ cell (DDX4)/Sertoli cell ratio, tissues sections were subjected to a standard immunofluorescence protocol as described below. Tissue sections fixed in PFA were incubated in citrate buffer (Diapath, Martinengo, Italy) at 96 °C for 40 min and cooled for 20 min at RT. After rinsing in distilled water, sections were permeabilized in PBS-Triton X-100 0.01% for 15 min at RT (only for Ki67). To avoid nonspecific staining, sections were blocked with 5% BSA + 5% horse serum (Ki67) or with 20% goat serum + 5% BSA (DDX4). Slides were then incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4 °C. Negative controls were performed with pre-immune IgGs. After 3 washes in PBST, sections were incubated with secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa Fluor® 488 for 1 h at RT. Sections were rinsed, dehydrated with ethanol, and mounted in Vectashield (Vector, Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) with Hoechst 33342 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Saint-Aubin, France).
4.4.2. TUNEL-SYCP3
To detect DNA fragmentation and spermatocytes in the same samples, tissue sections were first subjected to TUNEL assays (In Situ Cell Death kit POD, Roche, Mannheim, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, sections were post-fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min at RT and finally underwent the standard immunofluorescence protocol described above (without the permeabilization step). Rabbit anti-SYCP3 antibodies were used, and revealed with secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa Fluor® 594. Positive controls were performed with DNase I before TUNEL assays and negative controls were carried out by omitting the enzyme solution (TUNEL) or with pre-immune IgGs (SYCP3 immunostaining).
4.4.3. CD68
Tissue sections fixed with PFA were submitted to a standard immunofluorescence protocol, as previously described. CD68-immunolabeled testicular tissue images were acquired on a Thunder upright microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The surface area occupied by CD68+ macrophages was measured both in the peripheral (healthy) and central (necrotic) regions of the cultured explants.
4.4.4. γH2AX
Tissue sections fixed with Bouin’s solution were incubated in citrate buffer at 96 °C for 10 min for antigen retrieval, and cooled down for 5 min at RT. After rinsing with distilled water, endogenous peroxidases were blocked with HP block (Dako, Les Ulis, France) for 15 min at RT. After 3 washes in PBST, nonspecific binding sites were then blocked for 30 min at RT with 20% goat serum, 5% BSA in PBS-Tween 0.05%. Tissue sections were incubated for 2 h at RT with anti-γH2AX antibodies diluted in blocking buffer. Subsequently, primary antibodies were detected with polyvalent secondary antibodies for 5 min at RT. Staining was achieved after incubation with a streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase solution (ThermoFisher Scientific, Saint-Aubin, France) for 15 min at RT followed by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate for 30 s at RT. After nuclear counterstaining with hematoxylin (Diapath, Martinengo, Italy), sections were dehydrated in successive ethanol baths of increasing concentrations, followed by two xylene baths and mounting with Eukitt (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France).
Each in vivo replicate originated from different rats. For quantitative histological analyses, at least 2 levels of the testis/explant (separated by at least 30 µm) and 30 seminiferous tubules were analysed for each replicate. For each in vitro replicate, 2–3 testicular explants were analysed. In total, approximately 360 tubules were counted for in vivo controls and at least 720 tubules for the in vitro condition, per analysis.
HES and γH2AX immunostaining were analysed with a DM4000B light microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with Leica Application Suite software (LAS; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Immunofluorescence analyses (except for CD68) were performed on an epifluorescence microscope (DMRBE, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany GmbH) equipped with a monochrome CCD IEEE1394 FireWire video camera (Perceptive Instruments, Bury St Edmunds, UK).
4.5. Chromosome Spreads
Preparations of meiotic chromosome spreads from rat spermatocytes were adapted from previously published protocols [181,182] with slight modifications. Briefly, testicular tissue fragments from in vivo controls and in vitro cultured testicular explants were placed into a hypotonic extraction buffer (30 mM Tris, 50 mM sucrose, 17 mM sodium citrate, 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 118 mM potassium chloride, pH 8.2) for 40 to 60 min at RT. Fragments were then placed on a 20 µL drop of 100 mM sucrose, and the central necrotic area from in vitro cultured testicular explants was removed (2–3 explants per drop). Tissues were mechanically dispersed with two needles to obtain a cell suspension. After adding a 20 µL drop of sucrose solution and removing the remnant seminiferous tubules, cells were gently resuspended and spread (according to the drying-down technique) onto two Superfrost Plus glass slides previously coated with 1% PFA + 0.15% Triton X-100. Nuclei were air dried for at least 2 h in a humidified chamber. Finally, preparations were washed twice for 2 min in freshly prepared 0.4% Photoflo (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) and dried at RT. Preparations were stored at −20 °C and used within 2 weeks.
4.6. Analysis of Chromosome Synapsis
After 2 min at 37 °C, chromosome spreads were rehydrated in PBST for SYCP3/SYCP1 immunostaining or in successive Triton X-100 baths (5 min in PBS + 0.5% Triton X-100, 5 min in PBS + 0.05% Triton X-100) for SYCP3/γH2AX immunostaining. Spreads were blocked for 30 min at RT with 5% BSA + 5% horse serum in PBS (SYCP3/SYCP1) or with 2% BSA + 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS (SYCP3/γH2AX). They were then incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4 °C (SYCP3/SYCP1) or RT (SYCP3/γH2AX) in a humidified chamber. Negative controls were performed with pre-immune antibodies. After 3 washes, preparations were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies. Biotin was revealed with Alexa Fluor® 594 coupled to streptavidin for 30 min at RT. Preparations were rinsed, dehydrated with ethanol, and mounted in Vectashield (Vector, Eurobio, Les Ulis, France). The slides were sealed with polish for confocal microscopy. For the analysis of chromosome synapsis, spermatocytes were isolated from at least three 36.5 dpp control rat testes and D28 in vitro cultured tissues.
4.7. Classification of Prophase I Stages
The classification was performed as previously described [183]. Briefly, spermatocyte stages were identified by the morphology of the lateral elements (LE) revealed by SYCP3 immunostaining. At the early leptotene stage, LE appear as thin, dot-like fragments. At the leptotene stage, they are numerous and appear as short fragments. At the zygotene stage, LE elongate to form filaments. At the early zygotene stage, synapsis is not apparent or only in few and short fragments. The mid-zygotene stage is characterized by synapsis extension. At the late zygotene stage, LE are shorter than in mid-zygotene and almost all the chromosomes are synapsed extensively with their homologs, only few areas are not yet synapsed. At the pachytene stage, LE are shorter and all the chromosomes are synapsed. At the diplotene stage, synapsed LE begin to be released and chiasmata can be observed.
4.8. Confocal Microscopy Analysis
Confocal images (1024 × 1024 pixels) of meiotic chromosome spreads were acquired using an upright fixed-stage Leica TCS SP8 CFS confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with diode lasers (Coherent, Les Ulis, France) at 488 nm to excite Alexa Fluor® 488 and at 552 nm to excite Alexa Fluor® 594 and a conventional scanner at 400 Hz. Using a 63× (1.40, oil immersion), fluorescence emission was sequentially detected through a hybrid detector (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) in a photon counting mode with a specific band from 500 to 540 nm for Alexa Fluor® 488 and 600 to 650 nm for Alexa Fluor® 594. Z-stack images were acquired using an adapted step-size of 250 nm. 3D images (xyz) reconstruction and analysis were performed using Imaris software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). ImageJ (Rasband W.S., U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA,
4.9. RNA Extraction
Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions using an RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and stored at −20 °C until use. Genomic DNA was removed by incubation with Turbo DNase (Invitrogen, Villebon-Sur-Yvette, France) and RNA quality control was performed before RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR on Agilent Bioanalyzer (Les Ulis, France). All the samples chosen for analysis displayed an RNA integrity number (RIN) value greater than or equal to 8.5.
4.10. RNA-Seq Library Preparation and Sequencing
RNA-Seq libraries were generated from 400 ng of total RNA using a TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, following purification with poly(T)-oligo attached magnetic beads, mRNA was fragmented using divalent cations at 94 °C for 2 min. The cleaved RNA fragments were copied into first strand cDNA using reverse transcriptase and random primers. Strand specificity was achieved by replacing dTTP with dUTP during the second strand cDNA synthesis using DNA polymerase I and RNase H. Following the addition of a single ‘A’ base and subsequent ligation of the adapter on double stranded cDNA fragments, the products were purified and enriched with PCR (30 s at 98 °C; (10 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, 30 s at 72 °C) × 12 cycles; 5 min at 72 °C) to create the cDNA library. The excess of PCR primers was further removed by purification using AMPure XP beads (Beckman-Coulter, Villepinte, France), and the final cDNA libraries were checked for quality and quantified using capillary electrophoresis. Libraries were then single-read sequenced with a length of 50 bp on an Illumina Hiseq4000 sequencer. Image analysis and base calling were carried out using RTA v.2.7.7 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and bcl2fastq v.2.17.1.14 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
For each time point, three independent sets of total RNA were isolated and used as a template for RNA-seq library preparation. In addition, for each cultured sample, testicular tissue fragments originated from a minimum of 3 juvenile males. Thus, a minimum of 9 animals per time point was used to minimize/normalize the effect of genetic variability.
4.11. RNA-Seq Analysis
4.11.1. Read Mapping
Reads from each individual sample were aligned to the rn6 release of the rat genome with STAR (version 2.5.2a), [184] using previously published approaches [185,186,187,188]. Briefly, the STAR program was first run for each fastq file, using the RefSeq transcript annotation (GTF format) of the rat genome (release rn6) downloaded in November 2017. Exon junction outputs were then added to a splice junction set. STAR was next run a second time, complemented by the splice junction dataset, to produce a final alignment file (BAM format) for each sample.
4.11.2. Transcriptome Quantification
RefSeq transcripts were quantified with StringTie (version 1.3.3), with default settings applied [189]. Transcript abundances were next normalized with Ballgown (available in the StringTie suite), expressed as reads per kilobase of exon model per million reads mapped (RPKM).
4.11.3. Principal Component Analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed based on the gene abundance values with the FactoMineR package to graphically evaluate the distribution of sequenced samples [190].
4.11.4. Statistical Filtration and Clustering Analysis
The statistical filtration of the genes showing a differential expression (DE) across experimental samples was performed using AMEN [191]. Out of 17,322 genes in the dataset, we first selected 11,701 “detectable” or “expressed” genes, defined as those for which abundance levels exceeded 0.5 RPKM in at least one experimental condition (median value of sample duplicates). The D6 condition was removed due to the differences in cellular composition (Figure S4). Next, we compared 14.5 dpp testicular tissue samples to D16, D22, and D28 cultured tissue conditions and selected 1490 genes yielding at least one-fold change greater than or equal to 2.0 (median values of sample duplicates). A linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) statistical test was used to identify 1240 genes with significant abundance variations across samples (F-value adjusted with the FDR method: p ≤ 0.05) (Smyth, 2004). Finally, we intersected the three sets of DEGs to select 600 genes that showed significant differential abundances in all three comparisons. The resulting 600 genes were next clustered into seven expression patterns (P1-P7) with the unsupervised HCPC algorithm, respectively [190]. The resulting patterns were ordered according to peak expression levels in the different cell types.
4.12. Functional Analysis
AMEN [191] was used to calculate the Fisher exact probability, and the Gaussian hypergeometric test was used to identify significantly enriched biological processes (Gene ontology) and pathways (KEGG pathway) associated with the seven expression patterns (P1-P7). A specific term was considered enriched in a group of coexpressed genes if the p value was <0.01 and the number of genes in this cluster showing this annotation was >5. Upstream regulator analysis was performed using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (Ingenuity, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
4.13. Validation of the Transcriptome Data by RT-qPCR
To check the accuracy of the transcriptome data, DEGs identified as important for the process of spermatogenesis were selected for RT-qPCR. Each reaction was performed using three technical replicates and three biological replicates for the robustness of our analysis. RNA extraction and integrity analysis were performed as previously described.
4.13.1. Reverse Transcription
cDNA synthesis was performed using qScript™ cDNA SuperMix (Quanta Biosciences by VWR, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the following program: 5 min at 25 °C, 30 min at 42 °C, and 5 min at 85 °C.
4.13.2. qPCR
cDNA amplifications were carried out in a total volume of 13 μL containing 6 ng of cDNA templates, 6.5 μL of SYBR Green (ThermoFisher Scientific, Saint-Aubin, France), and 300 nM of each primer. Specific primers are listed in Table S6. Samples were dispensed using the Bravo pipetting robot (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France). Reactions were performed in 384-well plates (Life Technologies) in a QuantStudio 12K Flex system. The amplification condition was 20 s at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles (1 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C) and a final step of denaturation of 15 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, and 15 s at 95 °C. Melting curves were also obtained to ensure the specificity of PCR amplifications. The size of the amplicons was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis (E-gel 4%, Life Technologies). The relative expression level of each gene was normalized to two housekeeping genes, as recommended by the MIQE guidelines [192]: Gapdh and actin β (Actb), which were identified and validated as the most stable and suitable genes for RT-qPCR analysis in rodent testis development [193]. Data were analysed using the 2−ΔΔCt method [194]. The Kruskall–Wallis test was used to determine significant differences.
4.14. BTB Integrity Assay
The assay was performed as previously described [153]. Briefly, testicular fragments were immersed in a 10 mg/mL EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin solution (21335, ThermoFisher Scientific, Saint-Aubin, France) in PBS containing 1 mM CaCl2 for 30 min at room temperature. Incubation of testicular fragments in 1 mM CaCl2 in PBS was used as a negative control. Tissues were fixed with PFA, dehydrated, and prepared as previously described. DDX4 immunofluorescence was then performed as described above, with slight modifications. After antigenic sites revelation with citrate buffer, nonspecific binding sites were then blocked for 30 min at RT with 5% horse serum and 5% BSA in PBS-Tween 0.05%. Then, sections were incubated with a primary antibody against DDX4, revealed with a secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody coupled with Alexa Fluor® 488. Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated streptavidin was added at the same time to reveal biotin localization. Sections were rinsed, dehydrated with ethanol, and mounted in Vectashield with Hoechst 33342.
4.15. Hormone Measurement with LC-MS/MS
4.15.1. Testicular Tissue Preparation
Tissues were flattened out in a PBS + protease inhibitors (5892791001, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) buffer. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000× g, 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and stored at −20 °C until use.
4.15.2. Sample Preparation
The standards for testosterone and stable labelled isotopes were obtained from Merck Millipore. Working solutions were prepared in methanol. Serial dilutions from working solutions were used to prepare seven-point calibration curves and 3 quality control levels for all analytes. For the final calibration and quality control solutions, PBS was used for testicular fragments and αMEM for culture media. The linearity ranges were from 0.05 to 10 ng/mL.
A simple deproteinization was carried out by an automated sample preparation system, the CLAM-2030 (Shimadzu Corporation, Marne-la-Vallée, France) coupled with a 2D-UHPLC-MS/MS system. Once the sample was on board, 30 µL was automatically pipetted in a pre-conditioned tube containing a filter, in which reagents were added, then mixed and filtered. Briefly, the PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) filter vial (0.45 μm pore size) was previously conditioned with 20 μL of methanol (Carlo Erba, Val-de-Reuil, France). Successively, 30 μL of sample and 60 μL of a mixture of isotopically labelled internal standards in acetonitrile were added. The mixture was agitated for 120 s (1900 rpm), then filtered, by application of vacuum pressure (−60 to −65 kPa) for 120 s, into a collection vial. Finally, 30 µL of the extract was injected in the 2D-UHPLC-MS/MS system.
4.15.3. 2D-UHPLC-MS/MS Conditions
Analysis was performed on a two dimensional ultra-performance liquid chromatograph-tandem mass spectrometer (2D-UHPLC–MS/MS) consisting of the following Shimadzu® modules (Shimadzu Corporation): an isocratic pump LC20AD SP, for pre-treatment mode; a binary pump consisting of coupling two isocratic pumps Nexera LC30AD for the analytical mode; an automated sampler SIL-30AC; a column oven CTO-20AC; and a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer LCMS-8060.
The assay was broken down into two stages. The first was the pre-treatment, where the sample was loaded on the perfusion column. The second step was the elution of the compounds of interest to the analytical column.
The deproteinized extract performed by the CLAM-2030 was automatically transferred to the automated sampler, where 30 µL was directly analysed in the chromatographic system.
The LC-integrated online sample clean-up was performed using a perfusion column Shimadzu® MAYI-ODS (5 mm L × 2 mm I.D.). The first step consisted of loading the extract on the perfusion column with a mobile phase composed of 10 mM ammonium formate in water (Carlo Erba, Val-de-Reuil, France) at flow rate of 0.5 mL/minute over 2 min. Then, the system switched to the analytical step to elute the analytes from the perfusion column to the analytical column, to achieve chromatographic separation. During this step, the loading line was washed with propan-2-ol (Carlo Erba, Val-de-Reuil, France) over 3 min. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Restek® Raptor Biphenyl (50 mm L × 3 mm I.D., 2.7 μm) maintained at 40 °C and a gradient of (A) 1mM ammonium fluoride buffer in water (Carlo Erba, Val-de-Reuil, France) and (B) methanol (Carlo Erba, Val-de-Reuil, France) at flow rate of 0.675 mL/minute as follows: 0.0–2.10 min, 5% (B); 2.1–3.0 min, 5 to 65% (B); 3.0–4.75 min, 65% (B); 4.75–5.0 min, 65 to 70% (B); 5.0–6.6 min, 70% (B); 6.6–8.0 min, 70 to 75% (B); 8.0–8.5 min, 75 to 100% (B); 8.50–9.5 min, 100% (B); 9.5–9.6 min, 100% to 5% (B); 9.6–12.0 min, 5% (B).
Detection and quantification were performed by scheduled-MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) using a 1 millisecond pause time and a 50 millisecond dwell time to achieve sufficient points per peak.
The interface parameters and common settings were as follows: interface voltage: 1 kV; nebulizing gas flow: 3 L/minute; heating gas flow: 10 L/minute; drying gas flow: 10 L/minute; interface temperature: 400 °C; DL (desolvation line) temperature: 150 °C; heat block temperature: 500 °C; collision gas pressure 300 kPa. Compound-specific MRM parameters are shown in Table S7.
4.16. Western Blot Analysis
Tissues were lysed in an RIPA buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% cholic acid, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors. Tissue homogenates were agitated for 30 min at 4 °C and centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000× g. The supernatants were collected and stored at −20 °C until used. Protein concentration in lysates was determined using the Bradford assay (Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France). Loads were adjusted to 20 µg in sterile water with 4× Laemmli buffer, incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, and separated on Midi 4–15 % precast gels (Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France). Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose (Androgen receptor and CYP17A1) or PVDF (3βHSD) membranes, using the Transblot Turbo Transfer System (Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France). Transfer quality was confirmed by Ponceau S staining. Membranes were washed in TBS and then blocked in 5% non-fat milk (Androgen receptor and CYP17A1) or 5% BSA (3βHSD and β-actin) in TBS + 0.2% Tween-20 (TBST) for 30 min at 37 °C with a gentle rocking action. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (Table S5) overnight at 4 °C with rocking, washed three times in TBST for 5 min, and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (Table S5). Membranes were washed before incubation with ECL reagent (Clarity Western ECL Substrate, Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France) for 2 min and analysis with the Chemidoc imaging system (Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France) and the Image LabTM Software (v6.0.1, Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France). Β-actin was used to normalize proteins of interest.
Antibody dehybridization: Membranes were incubated for 30 min in a pre-warmed dehybridization solution containing 0.5 M Tris base (pH 6.8), 10% SDS, and 0.7% β-mercaptoethanol, in a 50 °C water bath. Then, membranes were rinsed abundantly with distilled water and rinsed twice with TBST. The efficiency of dehybridization was confirmed by the absence of labelling on the membrane after incubation with the secondary antibody.
4.17. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out with the GraphPad Prism software (v8.2.1, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests, Chi2 tests and Kruskall–Wallis tests, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison, were performed as specified in each figure. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conceptualization, N.R. and C.R.; methodology, N.R., C.R. and J.S.; validation, J.S., F.C., T.P. and F.F.; formal analysis, J.S. and F.C.; investigation, J.S.; resources, J.S. and F.C.; data curation, J.S. and F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and F.C.; writing—review and editing, N.R., C.R., M.D., L.M., L.D., A.R.-F.; visualization, J.S. and F.C.; supervision, N.R. and C.R.; funding acquisition, N.R. and C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The animal study protocol was approved by the the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rouen Normandy University (26016-2020061209299793).
Not applicable.
Raw data files (fastq) and expression data for all transcripts have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE197241. All data are also conveniently accessible through the ReproGenomics Viewer [
The authors are grateful to Damien Schapman and Ludovic Galas for their technical advices during the confocal microscopy acquisitions. Confocal microscopy images and PCR data were obtained at PRIMACEN (
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of D28 in vitro cultured tissues sections. (a) HES staining of paraffin-embedded testicular tissue sections. Scale bar: 50 µm; Magnification: ×200 (upper panel) and ×500 (lower panel). Tissues cultured for 28 days (D28), tissues recovered from an age-matched in vivo control (36.5 dpp) and from an immature in vivo control (14.5 dpp) were analysed. Germ cells were observed in the adluminal compartment (*) only at 36.5 dpp. The most advanced stage of spermatogenesis (b) was evaluated (n = 3). DDX4 immunostaining was performed to determine the percentage of seminiferous tubules containing germ cells (c) and the intratubular germ cells/Sertoli cells ratio (d). (e) Percentage of Ki67-positive tubules and (f) Ki67-positive cells. (g) Percentage of TUNEL-positive tubules and (h) TUNEL-positive cells. (i) Percentage of SYCP3-positive cells (spermatocytes) presenting DNA fragmentation (TUNEL positive). (j) Immunohistochemical localization of γH2AX in paraffin-embedded testicular tissue sections from 36.5 dpp (left) and D28 cultured tissues (right). Indistinguishable XY bodies and a dispersed staining within the nuclei were observed in cultured tissues. Scale bar: 50 µm; Magnification: ×500. Unless otherwise, n = 6. For statistical analyses, Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by Dunn’s post-test were applied. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. * p value < 0.05; ** p value < 0.01; *** p value < 0.001. dpp, days post-partum; S/S cell, Spermatogonia/Sertoli cell; HES, Hemalun eosin saffron; RS, Round spermatid.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Immunofluorescence staining of meiotic spread preparations from D28 cultured tissues and 36.5 dpp controls. (a,b) γH2AX (a), SYCP1 (b), and SYCP3 (a,b) immunostaining. The upper and lower rows show a representative pachytene spermatocyte at 36.5 dpp and at D28, respectively. Scale bar: 10 μm, Magnification: ×630, Zoom 4. (c) Average percentage of spermatocytes with more than one γH2AX foci and with abnormal synaptonemal complex at 36.5 dpp (in vivo controls) and at D28. Cells were obtained from at least three different rats/culture repeats. For statistical analyses, a Chi2 test was applied *** p < 0.0001. Dpp—Days post-partum; SC—synaptonemal complex.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Transcriptomic analyses of in vitro and in vivo testicular tissues. (a) Scatter plot representing the position of each sample along the first two dimensions. Each point represents the average expression level of transcripts, one dot per replicate. The variability between samples is mainly explained by their age of development (Dimension 1, 84.8%). The different clusters, represented by colored circles, highlight the distance between each group of transcriptomes. An evolution curve of the transcriptome of maturing testicular tissues is represented in yellow. (b) PCA analysis conducted on the red dotted circle is shown in panel A, corresponding to cultured tissues and 14.5 dpp immature testes. The variability between groups is mainly explained by the origin of the tissue (in vivo vs. in vitro). All the in vitro-matured tissues display similar transcriptomic profiles. (c) Flowchart summarizing the filtration and clustering strategies. The numbers below the cluster ID indicate the genes falling into each cluster. (d) A false-color heatmap summarizes the seven patterns defining the global concentrations for transcripts across the entire sample set. Each line corresponds to a gene and each row to the mean expression value of a replicate. P1 to P7 refer to the number of patterns, followed by the number of genes included in each pattern in parenthesis. A color scale is shown for standardized values in RPKM, per million mapped reads. n = 3. Dpp—days post-partum; HCPC—hierarchical clustering on principal components; RPKM—reads per kilobase of transcript.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Gene ontology enrichment in cultured testicular tissues. Each cluster is matched with a selection of enriched GO terms from the ontologies “biological process” and “cellular component”. Significantly enriched “biological process” terms and their identification numbers are given, followed by the total number of genes associated with the term and the numbers of genes observed vs. expected by chance. Significant GO terms for each pattern were highlighted with bold values. A color code indicates overrepresentation (red) and underrepresentation (blue) as indicated in the p value scale bar.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Analysis of the establishment and integrity of the blood–testis barrier throughout in vitro culture. The biotin tracer was revealed in red with Alexa fluor® 594-conjugated streptavidin. A staining with a DDX4 antibody in green was performed to detect germ cells. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst. The in vivo kinetics showed a progressive establishment of the BTB. The absence of a functional BTB was highlighted by the presence of the biotin tracer within the adluminal compartment of seminiferous tubules at 14.5 and 24.5 dpp. Tubules with an in-tact BTB (annotated with a star) were observed at 30.5 dpp and 36.5 dpp: in these tubules, the biotin tracer was restricted to the basal compartment. In in vitro cultured tissues, biotin permeated throughout the seminiferous epithelium in all the tubules observed, showing an impairment in the establishment of the BTB. Scale bar: 50 µm; Magnification: ×400. BTB—blood–testis barrier; dpp—days post-partum.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Analysis of steroidogenesis in in vitro culture. Expression of 3βHSD (a), CYP17A1 (b), and AR (c) was quantified by western blot. Tissues cultured for 28 days (D28), and tissues recovered from age-matched in vivo controls (36.5 dpp) and from immature in vivo controls (14.5 dpp) were analysed. Representative data are presented. n = 6. (d) CYP17A1 immunostaining in Leydig cells (circle). (e) AR immunostaining in Sertoli cells (triangle), peritubular cells (square), and Leydig cells (circle). Seminiferous tubules are delimited by dotted lines, and the panels on the right represent enlarged views of the boxes. Scale bar: 50 µm; Magnification: ×400. Intratesticular testosterone levels (f) and levels of testosterone in culture media (g). For statistical analyses, Kruskal–Wallis tests followed with Dunn’s post-test were applied for (a–c), and Mann–Whitney tests were applied for (f,g). Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. * p value < 0.05; ** p value < 0.01; *** p value < 0.001.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Analysis of in vitro cultures supplemented with anti-inflammatory molecules. (a) Predicted upstream transcriptional regulators of 594 DEGs between D28 in vitro cultured tissues and 14.5 dpp in vivo controls. (b) Percentage of seminiferous tubules at the spermatocyte I stage after 28-day cultures with anti-inflammatory molecules. (c) Percentage of surface area occupied by CD68+ macrophages. Left and right bars refer to the percentage of CD68+ surface area within the central and peripheral zones of the testicular fragments, respectively. n = 3. For statistical analyses, Kruskal–Wallis tests followed with Dunn’s post-test were applied. Tissues cultured with TAK 242 or Genistein (GENI) were compared to tissues cultured with DMSO. Tissues cultured with Infliximab (INFX) were compared to tissues cultured without DMSO. Data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m.
Biological information of the top 15 DEGs in each pattern (1–4 and 5–7) related to spermatogenesis. SAC—spindle assembly checkpoint.
| Patterns 1–4 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Gene | Adjusted |
Pattern | Fold Change (Log(2)) | Cell Type (Testis) | Function in Spermatogenesis | ||
| D16 | D22 | D28 | ||||||
| 25146 | Cyp17a1 | 4.10 × 105 | P4 | Down |
Down |
Down (−7.46) | Leydig cells [ |
Conversion of progesterone into dehydroepiandrosterone [ |
| 114215 | Insl3 | 4.10 × 105 | P4 | Down |
Down |
Down (−4.24) | Leydig cells and post-meiotic cells [ |
Testicular descent [ |
| 29460 | Tesk1 | 5.20 × 105 | P4 | Up |
Up (1.60) | Up (1.78) | Spermatocytes (late pachytene) to round spermatids [ |
Cytoskeleton reorganization [ |
| 362187 | Ccdc34 | 9.00 × 105 | P4 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.38) | Meiotic and post-meiotic cells [ |
Regulation of cell cycle G2/M [ |
| 171304 | Kif11 | 1.10 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.81) | Spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids, and Sertoli cells [ |
Chromosomes separation [ |
| 296368 | Ube2c | 1.10 × 104 | P4 | Down |
Down |
Down (−2.24) | Meiotic cells [ |
Regulation of metaphase/anaphase transition [ |
| 293733 | Incenp | 1.20 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.44) | Dividing cells [ |
Metaphase/anaphase progression [ |
| 25515 | Plk1 | 1.20 × 104 | P4 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.77) | Spermatocytes (diplotene), spermatocytes II, and round spermatids [ |
Metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and chromosomes segregation [ |
| 117524 | Ccnf | 1.40 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.67) | Dividing cells [ |
Cell cycle [ |
| 498709 | Cks2 | 1.40 × 104 | P4 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.56) | Meiotic cells [ |
Regulation of meiotic cell cycle, contribution to the control of the first metaphase/anaphase transition during mammalian meiosis [ |
| 81639 | Alox15 | 1.70 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−5.39) | Spermatozoa [ |
Contribution to spermiogenesis with formation and resorption of the cytoplasmic droplet [ |
| 171576 | Bub1b | 1.70 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.49) | Mitotic and meiotic cells [ |
Regulation of the SAC and chromosomal alignment, interaction with Plk1 [ |
| 114494 | Ccna2 | 1.70 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.68) | Spermatogonial stem cells (SSC), spermatogonia, spermatocytes (preleptotene), Sertoli cells [ |
Formation of the SSC pool [ |
| 303730 | Cbx2 | 1.80 × 104 | P1 | Down |
Down |
Down (−1.12) | Germ cells [ |
Establishment of the synaptonemal complex [ |
| Patterns 5–7 | ||||||||
| ID | Gene |
Adjusted
|
Pattern | Fold Change (Log(2)) | Cell Type (Testis) | Function in Spermatogenesis | ||
| D16 | D22 | D28 | ||||||
| 81687 | Mmp9 | 4.10 × 105 | P7 | Up |
Up (8.32) | Up (7.94) | Early SSC [ |
Cell junctions and BTB maintenance [ |
| 25696 | Vldlr | 4.10 × 105 | P7 | Up |
Up (2.90) | Up (2.48) | Spermatocytes (pachytene) and Leydig cells [ |
Regulation of meiosis [ |
| 252917 | Nr1d1 | 4.70 × 105 | P7 | Up |
Up (1.43) | Up (1.80) | Leydig cells [ |
Regulation of meiotic entry, Stra8/Nr1d1 balance [ |
| 24484 | Igfbp3 | 5.20 × 105 | P5 | Up |
Up (3.69) | Up (3.70) | Sertoli cells [ |
Regulation of testicular cell homeostasis via apoptosis [ |
| 245920 | Cxcl10 | 9.70 × 105 | P5 | Up |
Up (2.78) | Up (2.72) | Leydig cells, T cells, and macrophages [ |
Role in inflammatory process, induction of germ cell apoptosis [ |
| 313210 | Abca1 | 1.10 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (1.27) | Up (1.69) | Leydig and Sertoli cells, round spermatids, spermatozoa [ |
Cholesterol transporter [ |
| 114031 | Fstl3 | 1.10 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (2.04) | Up (2.08) | Leydig cells, spermatogonia, mature spermatids [ |
Regulation of gonadal development via interaction with activin [ |
| 84426 | Wnt4 | 1.10 × 104 | P7 | Up |
Up (3.90) | Up (4.18) | SSC [ |
Cell activity and apoptosis [ |
| 60350 | Cd14 | 1.40 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (2.53) | Up (2.85) | Putative SSC and early spermatogonia [ |
Inflammatory response signaling pathway [ |
| 25125 | Stat3 | 1.40 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (1.60) | Up (1.71) | Gonocytes, pro-spermatogonia, round spermatids [ |
Cell cycle regulation of G1 to S phase transition [ |
| 25425 | Ctsh | 1.40 × 104 | P7 | Up |
Up (1.25) | Up (1.38) | Germ cells, Sertoli and Leydig cells [ |
Germ cells, Sertoli and Leydig cells [ |
| 89808 | Cx3cl1 | 1.60 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (2.04) | Up (2.42) | Interstitial tissue [ |
Inflammation process [ |
| 25589 | Kdr | 1.70 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (1.74) | Up (1.91) | Spermatids, Sertoli and Leydig cells, lamina propria and blood vessels [ |
Participation to germ cell survival and enhancement of vascularization [ |
| 78968 | Srebf1 | 1.70 × 104 | P5 | Up |
Up (1.46) | Up (1.74) | Germ cells [ |
Regulation of cholesterol transport [ |
| 24825 | Tf | 1.70 × 104 | P7 | Up |
Up (3.52) | Up (2.95) | Sertoli cells, spermatocytes and early spermatids [ |
Regulation of sperm yield [ |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Delessard, M.; Saulnier, J.; Rives, A.; Dumont, L.; Rondanino, C.; Rives, N. Exposure to Chemotherapy During Childhood or Adulthood and Consequences on Spermatogenesis and Male Fertility. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 1454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041454] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093393]
2. Picton, H.M.; Wyns, C.; Anderson, R.A.; Goossens, E.; Jahnukainen, K.; Kliesch, S.; Mitchell, R.T.; Pennings, G.; Rives, N.; Tournaye, H. et al. A European Perspective on Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation for Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal and Adolescent Boys. Hum. Reprod.; 2015; 30, pp. 2463-2475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev190] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358785]
3. Onofre, J.; Baert, Y.; Faes, K.; Goossens, E. Cryopreservation of Testicular Tissue or Testicular Cell Suspensions: A Pivotal Step in Fertility Preservation. Hum. Reprod. Update; 2016; 22, pp. 744-761. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw029] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27566839]
4. Huleihel, M.; Nourashrafeddin, S.; Plant, T.M. Application of Three-Dimensional Culture Systems to Study Mammalian Spermatogenesis, with an Emphasis on the Rhesus Monkey (Macaca Mulatta). Asian J. Androl.; 2015; 17, pp. 972-980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.154994]
5. Rezaei Topraggaleh, T.; Rezazadeh Valojerdi, M.; Montazeri, L.; Baharvand, H. A Testis-Derived Macroporous 3D Scaffold as a Platform for the Generation of Mouse Testicular Organoids. Biomater. Sci.; 2019; 7, pp. 1422-1436. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8BM01001C]
6. Sato, T.; Katagiri, K.; Gohbara, A.; Inoue, K.; Ogonuki, N.; Ogura, A.; Kubota, Y.; Ogawa, T. In Vitro Production of Functional Sperm in Cultured Neonatal Mouse Testes. Nature; 2011; 471, pp. 504-507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09850]
7. Arkoun, B.; Dumont, L.; Milazzo, J.-P.; Way, A.; Bironneau, A.; Wils, J.; Macé, B.; Rives, N. Retinol Improves in Vitro Differentiation of Pre-Pubertal Mouse Spermatogonial Stem Cells into Sperm during the First Wave of Spermatogenesis. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0116660. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116660]
8. Oblette, A.; Rives-Feraille, A.; Dumont, L.; Delessard, M.; Saulnier, J.; Rives, N.; Rondanino, C. Dynamics of Epigenetic Modifications in ICSI Embryos from in Vitro-Produced Spermatozoa. Andrology; 2020; 9, pp. 640-656. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12926]
9. Pullium, J.K.; Milner, R.; Tuma, G.A.; Lin, P.H. Fertility after Homologous Prepubertal Testis Transplantation in the Dog. Transplant. Proc.; 2008; 40, pp. 2744-2749. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.08.076]
10. Fayomi, A.P.; Peters, K.; Sukhwani, M.; Valli-Pulaski, H.; Shetty, G.; Meistrich, M.L.; Houser, L.; Robertson, N.; Roberts, V.; Ramsey, C. et al. Autologous Grafting of Cryopreserved Prepubertal Rhesus Testis Produces Sperm and Offspring. Science; 2019; 363, pp. 1314-1319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2914]
11. Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.; Ogonuki, N.; Inoue, K.; Miki, H.; Ogura, A.; Toyokuni, S.; Shinohara, T. Long-Term Proliferation in Culture and Germline Transmission of Mouse Male Germline Stem Cells. Biol. Reprod.; 2003; 69, pp. 612-616. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.017012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12700182]
12. Hermann, B.P.; Sukhwani, M.; Winkler, F.; Pascarella, J.N.; Peters, K.A.; Sheng, Y.; Valli, H.; Rodriguez, M.; Ezzelarab, M.; Dargo, G. et al. Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation into Rhesus Testes Regenerates Spermatogenesis Producing Functional Sperm. Cell Stem Cell; 2012; 11, pp. 715-726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.07.017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23122294]
13. De Michele, F.; Poels, J.; Giudice, M.G.; De Smedt, F.; Ambroise, J.; Vermeulen, M.; Gruson, D.; Wyns, C. In-Vitro Formation of the Blood-Testis Barrier during Long-Term Organotypic Culture of Human Prepubertal Tissue: Comparison with a Large Cohort of Pre/Peripubertal Boys. Mol. Hum. Reprod.; 2018; 24, pp. 271-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay012]
14. Matsumura, T.; Sato, T.; Abe, T.; Sanjo, H.; Katagiri, K.; Kimura, H.; Fujii, T.; Tanaka, H.; Hirabayashi, M.; Ogawa, T. Rat in Vitro Spermatogenesis Promoted by Chemical Supplementations and Oxygen-Tension Control. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 3458. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82792-2]
15. Reda, A.; Hou, M.; Winton, T.R.; Chapin, R.E.; Söder, O.; Stukenborg, J.-B. In Vitro Differentiation of Rat Spermatogonia into Round Spermatids in Tissue Culture. Mol. Hum. Reprod.; 2016; 22, pp. 601-612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaw047]
16. Saulnier, J.; Oblette, A.; Delessard, M.; Dumont, L.; Rives, A.; Rives, N.; Rondanino, C. Improving Freezing Protocols and Organotypic Culture: A Histological Study on Rat Prepubertal Testicular Tissue. Ann. Biomed. Eng.; 2021; 49, pp. 203-218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02535-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440757]
17. Kurek, M.; Åkesson, E.; Yoshihara, M.; Oliver, E.; Cui, Y.; Becker, M.; Alves-Lopes, J.P.; Bjarnason, R.; Romerius, P.; Sundin, M. et al. Spermatogonia Loss Correlates with LAMA 1 Expression in Human Prepubertal Testes Stored for Fertility Preservation. Cells; 2021; 10, 241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020241] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33513766]
18. Medrano, J.V.; Vilanova-Pérez, T.; Fornés-Ferrer, V.; Navarro-Gomezlechon, A.; Martínez-Triguero, M.L.; García, S.; Gómez-Chacón, J.; Povo, I.; Pellicer, A.; Andrés, M.M. et al. Influence of Temperature, Serum, and Gonadotropin Supplementation in Short- and Long-Term Organotypic Culture of Human Immature Testicular Tissue. Fertil. Steril.; 2018; 110, pp. 1045-1057.E3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30396549]
19. Zickler, D.; Kleckner, N. Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.; 2015; 7, a016626. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016626]
20. Gao, J.; Colaiácovo, M.P. Zipping and Unzipping: Protein Modifications Regulating Synaptonemal Complex Dynamics. Trends Genet.; 2018; 34, pp. 232-245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.12.001]
21. Keeney, S.; Giroux, C.N.; Kleckner, N. Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family. Cell; 1997; 88, pp. 375-384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81876-0]
22. Baudat, F.; Manova, K.; Yuen, J.P.; Jasin, M.; Keeney, S. Chromosome Synapsis Defects and Sexually Dimorphic Meiotic Progression in Mice Lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell; 2000; 6, pp. 989-998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00098-8]
23. Carofiglio, F.; Sleddens-Linkels, E.; Wassenaar, E.; Inagaki, A.; van Cappellen, W.A.; Grootegoed, J.A.; Toth, A.; Baarends, W.M. Repair of Exogenous DNA Double-Strand Breaks Promotes Chromosome Synapsis in SPO11-Mutant Mouse Meiocytes, and Is Altered in the Absence of HORMAD1. DNA Repair; 2018; 63, pp. 25-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.01.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29414051]
24. Roeder, G.S.; Bailis, J.M. The Pachytene Checkpoint. Trends Genet.; 2000; 16, pp. 395-403. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02080-1]
25. De Rooij, D.G.; de Boer, P. Specific Arrests of Spermatogenesis in Genetically Modified and Mutant Mice. Cytogenet. Genome Res.; 2003; 103, pp. 267-276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000076812]
26. Stahl, P.J.; Mielnik, A.N.; Barbieri, C.E.; Schlegel, P.N.; Paduch, D.A. Deletion or Underexpression of the Y-Chromosome Genes CDY2 and HSFY Is Associated with Maturation Arrest in American Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia. Asian J. Androl.; 2012; 14, pp. 676-682. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/aja.2012.55]
27. Yatsenko, A.N.; Georgiadis, A.P.; Röpke, A.; Berman, A.J.; Jaffe, T.; Olszewska, M.; Westernströer, B.; Sanfilippo, J.; Kurpisz, M.; Rajkovic, A. et al. X-Linked TEX11 Mutations, Meiotic Arrest, and Azoospermia in Infertile Men. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2015; 372, pp. 2097-2107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1406192]
28. Kui, F.; Ye, H.; Chen, X.-L.; Zhang, J. Microarray Meta-Analysis Identifies Candidate Genes for Human Spermatogenic Arrest. Andrologia; 2019; 51, e13301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/and.13301]
29. Wang, Y.-H.; Yan, M.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.-Y.; Ding, Y.-F.; Lai, C.-P.; Tong, M.-H.; Li, J.-S. Rescue of Male Infertility through Correcting a Genetic Mutation Causing Meiotic Arrest in Spermatogonial Stem Cells. Asian J. Androl.; 2021; 23, pp. 590-599. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_97_20]
30. Ghieh, F.; Mitchell, V.; Mandon-Pepin, B.; Vialard, F. Genetic Defects in Human Azoospermia. Basic Clin. Androl.; 2019; 29, 4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0086-6]
31. Bolcun-Filas, E.; Hall, E.; Speed, R.; Taggart, M.; Grey, C.; de Massy, B.; Benavente, R.; Cooke, H.J. Mutation of the Mouse Syce1 Gene Disrupts Synapsis and Suggests a Link between Synaptonemal Complex Structural Components and DNA Repair. PLoS Genet.; 2009; 5, e1000393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/annotation/50260271-aed9-4316-b09a-304591b0cba5]
32. Barchi, M.; Mahadevaiah, S.; Di Giacomo, M.; Baudat, F.; de Rooij, D.G.; Burgoyne, P.S.; Jasin, M.; Keeney, S. Surveillance of Different Recombination Defects in Mouse Spermatocytes Yields Distinct Responses despite Elimination at an Identical Developmental Stage. Mol. Cell. Biol.; 2005; 25, pp. 7203-7215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.16.7203-7215.2005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16055729]
33. Smirnova, N.A.; Romanienko, P.J.; Khil, P.P.; Camerini-Otero, R.D. Gene Expression Profiles of Spo11-/- Mouse Testes with Spermatocytes Arrested in Meiotic Prophase I. Reproduction; 2006; 132, pp. 67-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00997] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16816334]
34. Mahadevaiah, S.K.; Bourc’his, D.; de Rooij, D.G.; Bestor, T.H.; Turner, J.M.A.; Burgoyne, P.S. Extensive Meiotic Asynapsis in Mice Antagonises Meiotic Silencing of Unsynapsed Chromatin and Consequently Disrupts Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation. J. Cell Biol.; 2008; 182, pp. 263-276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200710195] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18663141]
35. ElInati, E.; Russell, H.R.; Ojarikre, O.A.; Sangrithi, M.; Hirota, T.; de Rooij, D.G.; McKinnon, P.J.; Turner, J.M.A. DNA Damage Response Protein TOPBP1 Regulates X Chromosome Silencing in the Mammalian Germ Line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2017; 114, pp. 12536-12541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712530114]
36. Xu, X.; Aprelikova, O.; Moens, P.; Deng, C.-X.; Furth, P.A. Impaired Meiotic DNA-Damage Repair and Lack of Crossing-over during Spermatogenesis in BRCA1 Full-Length Isoform Deficient Mice. Development; 2003; 130, pp. 2001-2012. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.00410]
37. Manfo, F.P.T.; Nantia, E.A.; Mathur, P.P. Effect of Environmental Contaminants on Mammalian Testis. Curr. Mol. Pharm.; 2014; 7, pp. 119-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874467208666150126155420]
38. Durairajanayagam, D.; Agarwal, A.; Ong, C. Causes, Effects and Molecular Mechanisms of Testicular Heat Stress. Reprod. Biomed. Online; 2015; 30, pp. 14-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.018]
39. Chen, Q.; Deng, T.; Han, D. Testicular Immunoregulation and Spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2016; 59, pp. 157-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.019]
40. Li, H.; Palczewski, K.; Baehr, W.; Clagett-Dame, M. Vitamin A Deficiency Results in Meiotic Failure and Accumulation of Undifferentiated Spermatogonia in Prepubertal Mouse Testis. Biol. Reprod.; 2011; 84, pp. 336-341. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.086157]
41. Chihara, M.; Otsuka, S.; Ichii, O.; Kon, Y. Vitamin A Deprivation Affects the Progression of the Spermatogenic Wave and Initial Formation of the Blood-Testis Barrier, Resulting in Irreversible Testicular Degeneration in Mice. J. Reprod. Dev.; 2013; 59, pp. 525-535. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2013-058] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23934320]
42. Cobellis, G.; Noviello, C.; Nino, F.; Romano, M.; Mariscoli, F.; Martino, A.; Parmeggiani, P.; Papparella, A. Spermatogenesis and Cryptorchidism. Front. Endocrinol.; 2014; 5, 63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00063] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24829558]
43. Hazra, R.; Jimenez, M.; Desai, R.; Handelsman, D.J.; Allan, C.M. Sertoli Cell Androgen Receptor Expression Regulates Temporal Fetal and Adult Leydig Cell Differentiation, Function, and Population Size. Endocrinology; 2013; 154, pp. 3410-3422. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-2273] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23766127]
44. Jeyaraj, D.A.; Grossman, G.; Weaver, C.; Petrusz, P. Dynamics of Testicular Germ Cell Proliferation in Normal Mice and Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Rat Androgen-Binding Protein: A Flow Cytometric Evaluation. Biol. Reprod.; 2002; 66, pp. 877-885. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.4.877]
45. Gangwar, P.K.; Sankhwar, S.N.; Pant, S.; Krishna, A.; Singh, B.P.; Mahdi, A.A.; Singh, R. Increased Gonadotropins and Prolactin Are Linked to Infertility in Males. Bioinformation; 2020; 16, pp. 176-182. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630016176]
46. Welsh, M.; Saunders, P.T.K.; Atanassova, N.; Sharpe, R.M.; Smith, L.B. Androgen Action via Testicular Peritubular Myoid Cells Is Essential for Male Fertility. FASEB J.; 2009; 23, pp. 4218-4230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.09-138347]
47. Xu, Q.; Lin, H.-Y.; Yeh, S.-D.; Yu, I.-C.; Wang, R.-S.; Chen, Y.-T.; Zhang, C.; Altuwaijri, S.; Chen, L.-M.; Chuang, K.-H. et al. Infertility with Defective Spermatogenesis and Steroidogenesis in Male Mice Lacking Androgen Receptor in Leydig Cells. Endocrine; 2007; 32, pp. 96-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-007-9015-0]
48. Yao, J.; Zuo, H.; Gao, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.; Li, X. The Effects of IGF-1 on Mouse Spermatogenesis Using an Organ Culture Method. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2017; 491, pp. 840-847. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.05.125]
49. Abe, T.; Nishimura, H.; Sato, T.; Suzuki, H.; Ogawa, T.; Suzuki, T. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Inadequate Spermatogenesis and Immediate Radical Immune Reactions during Organ Culture in Vitro Spermatogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2020; 530, pp. 732-738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.161]
50. Morohaku, K.; Tanimoto, R.; Sasaki, K.; Kawahara-Miki, R.; Kono, T.; Hayashi, K.; Hirao, Y.; Obata, Y. Complete in Vitro Generation of Fertile Oocytes from Mouse Primordial Germ Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 9021-9026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603817113]
51. Burgoyne, P.S.; Mahadevaiah, S.K.; Turner, J.M.A. The Consequences of Asynapsis for Mammalian Meiosis. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2009; 10, pp. 207-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2505] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19188923]
52. Blanco-Rodríguez, J. ΓH2AX Marks the Main Events of the Spermatogenic Process. Microsc. Res. Tech.; 2009; 72, pp. 823-832. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20730] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19405149]
53. Fijak, M.; Bhushan, S.; Meinhardt, A. Immunoprivileged Sites: The Testis. Methods Mol. Biol.; 2011; 677, pp. 459-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-869-0_29] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941627]
54. Jiang, X.-H.; Bukhari, I.; Zheng, W.; Yin, S.; Wang, Z.; Cooke, H.J.; Shi, Q.-H. Blood-Testis Barrier and Spermatogenesis: Lessons from Genetically-Modified Mice. Asian J. Androl.; 2014; 16, pp. 572-580. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.125401] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24713828]
55. Mruk, D.D.; Cheng, C.Y. The Mammalian Blood-Testis Barrier: Its Biology and Regulation. Endocr. Rev.; 2015; 36, pp. 564-591. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2014-1101]
56. Aghazadeh, Y.; Zirkin, B.R.; Papadopoulos, V. Pharmacological Regulation of the Cholesterol Transport Machinery in Steroidogenic Cells of the Testis. Vitam. Horm.; 2015; 98, pp. 189-227. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.vh.2014.12.006]
57. Sansone, A.; Kliesch, S.; Isidori, A.M.; Schlatt, S. AMH and INSL3 in Testicular and Extragonadal Pathophysiology: What Do We Know?. Andrology; 2019; 7, pp. 131-138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12597]
58. Toshima, J.; Ohashi, K.; Okano, I.; Nunoue, K.; Kishioka, M.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T.; Hirai, M.; Baba, T.; Mizuno, K. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Protein Kinase, TESK1, Specifically Expressed in Testicular Germ Cells. J. Biol. Chem.; 1995; 270, pp. 31331-31337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.52.31331]
59. Toshima, J.; Koji, T.; Mizuno, K. Stage-Specific Expression of Testis-Specific Protein Kinase 1 (TESK1) in Rat Spermatogenic Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 1998; 249, pp. 107-112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.9099]
60. Toshima, J.; Toshima, J.Y.; Suzuki, M.; Noda, T.; Mizuno, K. Cell-Type-Specific Expression of a TESK1 Promoter-Linked LacZ Gene in Transgenic Mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2001; 286, pp. 566-573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5404]
61. Pati, D.; Meistrich, M.L.; Plon, S.E. Human Cdc34 and Rad6B Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes Target Repressors of Cyclic AMP-Induced Transcription for Proteolysis. Mol. Cell. Biol.; 1999; 19, pp. 5001-5013. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.7.5001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10373550]
62. Butz, N.; Ruetz, S.; Natt, F.; Hall, J.; Weiler, J.; Mestan, J.; Ducarre, M.; Grossenbacher, R.; Hauser, P.; Kempf, D. et al. The Human Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme Cdc34 Controls Cellular Proliferation through Regulation of P27Kip1 Protein Levels. Exp. Cell Res.; 2005; 303, pp. 482-493. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.10.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15652359]
63. Legesse-Miller, A.; Elemento, O.; Pfau, S.J.; Forman, J.J.; Tavazoie, S.; Coller, H.A. Let-7 Overexpression Leads to an Increased Fraction of Cells in G2/M, Direct down-Regulation of Cdc34, and Stabilization of Wee1 Kinase in Primary Fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem.; 2009; 284, pp. 6605-6609. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C900002200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19126550]
64. Hara-Yokoyama, M.; Kurihara, H.; Ichinose, S.; Matsuda, H.; Ichinose, S.; Kurosawa, M.; Tada, N.; Iwahara, C.; Terasawa, K.; Podyma-Inoue, K.A. et al. KIF11 as a Potential Marker of Spermatogenesis Within Mouse Seminiferous Tubule Cross-Sections. J. Histochem. Cytochem.; 2019; 67, pp. 813-824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1369/0022155419871027]
65. Blangy, A.; Lane, H.A.; d’Hérin, P.; Harper, M.; Kress, M.; Nigg, E.A. Phosphorylation by P34cdc2 Regulates Spindle Association of Human Eg5, a Kinesin-Related Motor Essential for Bipolar Spindle Formation in Vivo. Cell; 1995; 83, pp. 1159-1169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90142-6]
66. Kapitein, L.C.; Peterman, E.J.G.; Kwok, B.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kapoor, T.M.; Schmidt, C.F. The Bipolar Mitotic Kinesin Eg5 Moves on Both Microtubules That It Crosslinks. Nature; 2005; 435, pp. 114-118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03503]
67. Ben-Eliezer, I.; Pomerantz, Y.; Galiani, D.; Nevo, N.; Dekel, N. Appropriate Expression of Ube2C and Ube2S Controls the Progression of the First Meiotic Division. FASEB J.; 2015; 29, pp. 4670-4681. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.15-274522]
68. Peters, J.-M. The Anaphase-Promoting Complex: Proteolysis in Mitosis and Beyond. Mol. Cell; 2002; 9, pp. 931-943. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00540-3]
69. Hao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Cowell, J. Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme UBE2C: Molecular Biology, Role in Tumorigenesis, and Potential as a Biomarker. Tumour Biol.; 2012; 33, pp. 723-730. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-011-0291-1]
70. Adams, R.R.; Eckley, D.M.; Vagnarelli, P.; Wheatley, S.P.; Gerloff, D.L.; Mackay, A.M.; Svingen, P.A.; Kaufmann, S.H.; Earnshaw, W.C. Human INCENP Colocalizes with the Aurora-B/AIRK2 Kinase on Chromosomes and Is Overexpressed in Tumour Cells. Chromosoma; 2001; 110, pp. 65-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004120100130]
71. Parra, M.T.; Viera, A.; Gómez, R.; Page, J.; Carmena, M.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Rufas, J.S.; Suja, J.A. Dynamic Relocalization of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex Proteins Inner Centromere Protein (INCENP) and Aurora-B Kinase during Male Mouse Meiosis. J. Cell Sci.; 2003; 116, 961. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00330] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12584241]
72. Goto, H.; Kiyono, T.; Tomono, Y.; Kawajiri, A.; Urano, T.; Furukawa, K.; Nigg, E.A.; Inagaki, M. Complex Formation of Plk1 and INCENP Required for Metaphase-Anaphase Transition. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2006; 8, pp. 180-187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1350] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16378098]
73. Matsubara, N.; Yanagisawa, M.; Nishimune, Y.; Obinata, M.; Matsui, Y. Murine Polo like Kinase 1 Gene Is Expressed in Meiotic Testicular Germ Cells and Oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev.; 1995; 41, pp. 407-415. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080410403] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7576608]
74. Jordan, P.W.; Karppinen, J.; Handel, M.A. Polo-like Kinase Is Required for Synaptonemal Complex Disassembly and Phosphorylation in Mouse Spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci.; 2012; 125, 5061. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.105015]
75. Liu, D.; Davydenko, O.; Lampson, M.A. Polo-like Kinase-1 Regulates Kinetochore-Microtubule Dynamics and Spindle Checkpoint Silencing. J. Cell Biol.; 2012; 198, pp. 491-499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201205090]
76. Mondal, G.; Ohashi, A.; Yang, L.; Rowley, M.; Couch, F.J. Tex14, a Plk1-Regulated Protein, Is Required for Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment and Regulation of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint. Mol. Cell; 2012; 45, pp. 680-695. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.013]
77. Giménez-Abián, J.F.; Sumara, I.; Hirota, T.; Hauf, S.; Gerlich, D.; de la Torre, C.; Ellenberg, J.; Peters, J.-M. Regulation of Sister Chromatid Cohesion between Chromosome Arms. Curr. Biol.; 2004; 14, pp. 1187-1193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.052]
78. Matsumura, S.; Toyoshima, F.; Nishida, E. Polo-like Kinase 1 Facilitates Chromosome Alignment during Prometaphase through BubR1. J. Biol. Chem.; 2007; 282, pp. 15217-15227. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M611053200]
79. Kong, M.; Barnes, E.A.; Ollendorff, V.; Donoghue, D.J. Cyclin F Regulates the Nuclear Localization of Cyclin B1 through a Cyclin-Cyclin Interaction. EMBO J.; 2000; 19, pp. 1378-1388. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.6.1378]
80. Sun, Y.; Fu, L.; Xue, F.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Chen, J. Digital Gene Expression Profiling and Validation Study Highlight Cyclin F as an Important Regulator for Sperm Motility of Chickens. Poult. Sci.; 2019; 98, pp. 5118-5126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez212]
81. Rother, K.; Dengl, M.; Lorenz, J.; Tschöp, K.; Kirschner, R.; Mössner, J.; Engeland, K. Gene Expression of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Subunit Cks2 Is Repressed by the Tumor Suppressor P53 but Not by the Related Proteins P63 or P73. FEBS Lett.; 2007; 581, pp. 1166-1172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.02.028] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17336302]
82. Spruck, C.H.; de Miguel, M.P.; Smith, A.P.L.; Ryan, A.; Stein, P.; Schultz, R.M.; Lincoln, A.J.; Donovan, P.J.; Reed, S.I. Requirement of Cks2 for the First Metaphase/Anaphase Transition of Mammalian Meiosis. Science; 2003; 300, pp. 647-650. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1084149] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12714746]
83. Fischer, K.A.; Van Leyen, K.; Lovercamp, K.W.; Manandhar, G.; Sutovsky, M.; Feng, D.; Safranski, T.; Sutovsky, P. 15-Lipoxygenase Is a Component of the Mammalian Sperm Cytoplasmic Droplet. Reproduction; 2005; 130, pp. 213-222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00646] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16049159]
84. Bromfield, E.G.; Mihalas, B.P.; Dun, M.D.; Aitken, R.J.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Walters, J.L.H.; Nixon, B. Inhibition of Arachidonate 15-Lipoxygenase Prevents 4-Hydroxynonenal-Induced Protein Damage in Male Germ Cells. Biol. Reprod.; 2017; 96, pp. 598-609. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/iox005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339608]
85. Bromfield, E.G.; Walters, J.L.H.; Cafe, S.L.; Bernstein, I.R.; Stanger, S.J.; Anderson, A.L.; Aitken, R.J.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Dun, M.D.; Gadella, B.M. et al. Differential Cell Death Decisions in the Testis: Evidence for an Exclusive Window of Ferroptosis in Round Spermatids. Mol. Hum. Reprod.; 2019; 25, pp. 241-256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaz015]
86. Walters, J.L.H.; De Iuliis, G.N.; Dun, M.D.; Aitken, R.J.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Nixon, B.; Bromfield, E.G. Pharmacological Inhibition of Arachidonate 15-Lipoxygenase Protects Human Spermatozoa against Oxidative Stress. Biol. Reprod.; 2018; 98, pp. 784-794. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy058]
87. Izumi, H.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ikeuchi, T.; Saya, H.; Kajii, T.; Matsuura, S. BubR1 Localizes to Centrosomes and Suppresses Centrosome Amplification via Regulating Plk1 Activity in Interphase Cells. Oncogene; 2009; 28, pp. 2806-2820. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.141]
88. Jeganathan, K.B.; van Deursen, J.M. Differential Mitotic Checkpoint Protein Requirements in Somatic and Germ Cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans.; 2006; 34, pp. 583-586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0340583]
89. Choi, E.; Lee, H. Chromosome Damage in Mitosis Induces BubR1 Activation and Prometaphase Arrest. FEBS Lett.; 2008; 582, pp. 1700-1706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.028]
90. Parra, M.T.; Gómez, R.; Viera, A.; Llano, E.; Pendás, A.M.; Rufas, J.S.; Suja, J.A. Sequential Assembly of Centromeric Proteins in Male Mouse Meiosis. PLoS Genet.; 2009; 5, e1000417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000417]
91. Ravnik, S.E.; Wolgemuth, D.J. The Developmentally Restricted Pattern of Expression in the Male Germ Line of a Murine Cyclin A, Cyclin A2, Suggests Roles in Both Mitotic and Meiotic Cell Cycles. Dev. Biol.; 1996; 173, pp. 69-78. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1996.0007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8575639]
92. Ravnik, S.E.; Wolgemuth, D.J. Regulation of Meiosis during Mammalian Spermatogenesis: The A-Type Cyclins and Their Associated Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Are Differentially Expressed in the Germ-Cell Lineage. Dev. Biol.; 1999; 207, pp. 408-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1998.9156] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10068472]
93. Sweeney, C.; Murphy, M.; Kubelka, M.; Ravnik, S.E.; Hawkins, C.F.; Wolgemuth, D.J.; Carrington, M. A Distinct Cyclin A Is Expressed in Germ Cells in the Mouse. Development; 1996; 122, pp. 53-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.122.1.53] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8565853]
94. Ma, F.; Wang, X.; Chung, S.S.W.; Sicinski, P.; Shang, E.; Wolgemuth, D.J. Cyclin A2 Is Essential for Mouse Gonocyte Maturation. Cell Cycle; 2020; 19, pp. 1654-1664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2020.1762314] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420805]
95. Zhang, Q.-H.; Yuen, W.S.; Adhikari, D.; Flegg, J.A.; FitzHarris, G.; Conti, M.; Sicinski, P.; Nabti, I.; Marangos, P.; Carroll, J. Cyclin A2 Modulates Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment in Meiosis II. J. Cell Biol.; 2017; 216, pp. 3133-3143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607111] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819014]
96. Baumann, C.; De La Fuente, R. Role of Polycomb Group Protein Cbx2/M33 in Meiosis Onset and Maintenance of Chromosome Stability in the Mammalian Germline. Genes; 2011; 2, pp. 59-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes2010059]
97. Lee, W.-Y.; Do, J.T.; Park, C.; Kim, J.H.; Chung, H.-J.; Kim, K.-W.; Gil, C.-H.; Kim, N.-H.; Song, H. Identification of Putative Biomarkers for the Early Stage of Porcine Spermatogonial Stem Cells Using Next-Generation Sequencing. PLoS ONE; 2016; 11, e0147298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147298]
98. Robinson, L.L.; Sznajder, N.A.; Riley, S.C.; Anderson, R.A. Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases in Human Fetal Testis and Ovary. Mol. Hum. Reprod.; 2001; 7, pp. 641-648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/7.7.641]
99. Kumar, S.; Tinson, A.; Mulligan, B.P.; Ojha, S. Gelatin Binding Proteins in Reproductive Physiology. Indian J. Microbiol.; 2016; 56, pp. 383-393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-0618-0]
100. Kurzawski, M.; Kaczmarek, M.; Kłysz, M.; Malinowski, D.; Kazienko, A.; Kurzawa, R.; Droździk, M. MMP2, MMP9 and TIMP2 Polymorphisms Affect Sperm Parameters but Not Fertility in Polish Males. Andrologia; 2017; 49, e12654. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/and.12654]
101. Lydka, M.; Bilinska, B.; Cheng, C.Y.; Mruk, D.D. Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Mediated Restructuring of the Sertoli Cell Barrier in Vitro Involves Matrix Metalloprotease 9 (MMP9), Membrane-Bound Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and the Actin Cytoskeleton. Spermatogenesis; 2012; 2, pp. 294-303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/spmg.22602] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248771]
102. Siu, M.K.Y.; Lee, W.M.; Cheng, C.Y. The Interplay of Collagen IV, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Gelatinase B (Matrix Metalloprotease-9), and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteases-1 in the Basal Lamina Regulates Sertoli Cell-Tight Junction Dynamics in the Rat Testis. Endocrinology; 2003; 144, pp. 371-387. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2002-220786] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12488366]
103. Siu, M.K.Y.; Cheng, C.Y. Interactions of Proteases, Protease Inhibitors, and the Beta1 Integrin/Laminin Gamma3 Protein Complex in the Regulation of Ectoplasmic Specialization Dynamics in the Rat Testis. Biol. Reprod.; 2004; 70, pp. 945-964. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.023606]
104. Siu, M.K.Y.; Cheng, C.Y. Extracellular Matrix and Its Role in Spermatogenesis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.; 2008; 636, pp. 74-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09597-4_5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19856163]
105. Mohagheghi, S.; Khodadadi, I.; Karami, M.; Amiri, I.; Tavilani, H. Gene Polymorphism of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 in Asthenozoospermic Male Subjects. Int. J. Fertil. Steril.; 2018; 11, pp. 247-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5038] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043698]
106. Riaz, M.A.; Stammler, A.; Borgers, M.; Konrad, L. Clusterin Signals via ApoER2/VLDLR and Induces Meiosis of Male Germ Cells. Am. J. Transl. Res.; 2017; 9, pp. 1266-1276. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28386352]
107. Tacken, P.J.; van der Zee, A.; Beumer, T.L.; Florijn, R.J.; Gijpels, M.J.; Havekes, L.M.; Frants, R.R.; van Dijk, K.W.; Hofker, M.H. Effective Generation of Very Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Transgenic Mice by Overlapping Genomic DNA Fragments: High Testis Expression and Disturbed Spermatogenesis. Transgenic Res.; 2001; 10, pp. 211-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016682520887] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11437278]
108. Li, C.; Zhang, L.; Ma, T.; Gao, L.; Yang, L.; Wu, M.; Pang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yao, Q.; Xiao, Y. et al. Bisphenol A Attenuates Testosterone Production in Leydig Cells via the Inhibition of NR1D1 Signaling. Chemosphere; 2021; 263, 128020. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128020]
109. Ferder, I.C.; Fung, L.; Ohguchi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lassen, K.G.; Capen, D.; Brown, D.; Xavier, R.J.; Wang, N. Meiotic Gatekeeper STRA8 Suppresses Autophagy by Repressing Nr1d1 Expression during Spermatogenesis in Mice. PLoS Genet.; 2019; 15, e1008084. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008084]
110. Rappaport, M.S.; Smith, E.P. Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein 3 in the Rat Testis: Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Dependence of MRNA Expression and Inhibition of IGF-I Action on Cultured Sertoli Cells. Biol. Reprod.; 1995; 52, pp. 419-425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod52.2.419]
111. Lin, T.; Wang, D.; Nagpal, M.L.; Shimasaki, S.; Ling, N. Expression and Regulation of Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1, -2, -3, and -4 Messenger Ribonucleic Acids in Purified Rat Leydig Cells and Their Biological Effects. Endocrinology; 1993; 132, pp. 1898-1904. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.132.5.7682935] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7682935]
112. Lue, Y.; Swerdloff, R.; Liu, Q.; Mehta, H.; Hikim, A.S.; Lee, K.-W.; Jia, Y.; Hwang, D.; Cobb, L.J.; Cohen, P. et al. Opposing Roles of Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 and Humanin in the Regulation of Testicular Germ Cell Apoptosis. Endocrinology; 2010; 151, pp. 350-357. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0577] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19952275]
113. Hu, J.; You, S.; Li, W.; Wang, D.; Nagpal, M.L.; Mi, Y.; Liang, P.; Lin, T. Expression and Regulation of Interferon-Gamma-Inducible Protein 10 Gene in Rat Leydig Cells. Endocrinology; 1998; 139, pp. 3637-3645. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.139.8.6143] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9681518]
114. Le Goffic, R.; Mouchel, T.; Aubry, F.; Patard, J.-J.; Ruffault, A.; Jégou, B.; Samson, M. Production of the Chemokines Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1, Regulated on Activation Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted Protein, Growth-Related Oncogene, and Interferon-Gamma-Inducible Protein-10 Is Induced by the Sendai Virus in Human and Rat Testicular Cells. Endocrinology; 2002; 143, pp. 1434-1440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.143.4.8735]
115. Aubry, F.; Habasque, C.; Satie, A.P.; Jégou, B.; Samson, M. Expression and Regulation of the CXC-Chemokines, GRO/KC and IP-10/Mob-1 in Rat Seminiferous Tubules. Eur. Cytokine Netw.; 2000; 11, pp. 690-698.
116. Jiang, Q.; Wang, F.; Shi, L.; Zhao, X.; Gong, M.; Liu, W.; Song, C.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wu, H. et al. C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10 Produced by Mouse Sertoli Cells in Response to Mumps Virus Infection Induces Male Germ Cell Apoptosis. Cell Death Dis.; 2017; 8, e3146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.560]
117. Dong, Y.-S.; Hou, W.-G.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.-B.; Hao, G.-Z.; Zhang, H.-F.; Li, J.-C.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, S.; Liang, G.-B. et al. Unexpected Requirement for a Binding Partner of the Syntaxin Family in Phagocytosis by Murine Testicular Sertoli Cells. Cell Death Differ.; 2016; 23, pp. 787-800. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.139]
118. Merkl, M.; Ertl, R.; Handschuh, S.; Aurich, C.; Schäfer-Somi, S. The Cholesterol Transporter ABCA1 Is Expressed in Stallion Spermatozoa and Reproductive Tract Tissues. Theriogenology; 2016; 85, pp. 1080-1089. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.019]
119. Stocchi, L.; Giardina, E.; Varriale, L.; Sechi, A.; Vagnini, A.; Parri, G.; Valentini, M.; Capalbo, M. Can Tangier Disease Cause Male Infertility? A Case Report and an Overview on Genetic Causes of Male Infertility and Hormonal Axis Involved. Mol. Genet. Metab.; 2018; 123, pp. 43-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.11.009]
120. Xia, Y.; Sidis, Y.; Schneyer, A. Overexpression of Follistatin-like 3 in Gonads Causes Defects in Gonadal Development and Function in Transgenic Mice. Mol. Endocrinol.; 2004; 18, pp. 979-994. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2003-0364]
121. Tsuchida, K.; Arai, K.Y.; Kuramoto, Y.; Yamakawa, N.; Hasegawa, Y.; Sugino, H. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Follistatin-like Protein as a Binding Protein for the TGF-Beta Family. J. Biol. Chem.; 2000; 275, pp. 40788-40796. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006114200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11010968]
122. Oldknow, K.J.; Seebacher, J.; Goswami, T.; Villen, J.; Pitsillides, A.A.; O’Shaughnessy, P.J.; Gygi, S.P.; Schneyer, A.L.; Mukherjee, A. Follistatin-like 3 (FSTL3) Mediated Silencing of Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) Signaling Is Essential for Testicular Aging and Regulating Testis Size. Endocrinology; 2013; 154, pp. 1310-1320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1886] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23407452]
123. Boyer, A.; Yeh, J.R.; Zhang, X.; Paquet, M.; Gaudin, A.; Nagano, M.C.; Boerboom, D. CTNNB1 Signaling in Sertoli Cells Downregulates Spermatogonial Stem Cell Activity via WNT4. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e29764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029764]
124. Jordan, B.K.; Shen, J.H.-C.; Olaso, R.; Ingraham, H.A.; Vilain, E. Wnt4 Overexpression Disrupts Normal Testicular Vasculature and Inhibits Testosterone Synthesis by Repressing Steroidogenic Factor 1/Beta-Catenin Synergy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2003; 100, pp. 10866-10871. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1834480100] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12949260]
125. Orwig, K.E.; Ryu, B.-Y.; Master, S.R.; Phillips, B.T.; Mack, M.; Avarbock, M.R.; Chodosh, L.; Brinster, R.L. Genes Involved in Post-Transcriptional Regulation Are Overrepresented in Stem/Progenitor Spermatogonia of Cryptorchid Mouse Testes. Stem Cells; 2008; 26, pp. 927-938. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0893] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18203673]
126. Park, H.-J.; Lee, W.-Y.; Park, C.; Hong, K.; Song, H. CD14 Is a Unique Membrane Marker of Porcine Spermatogonial Stem Cells, Regulating Their Differentiation. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 9980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46000-6]
127. Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Liu, X.-P.; Wang, R.-A.; Jin, Y.; Xu, R.-J. Expression and Localization of Smad1, Smad2 and Smad4 Proteins in Rat Testis during Postnatal Development. Asian J. Androl.; 2003; 5, pp. 51-55.
128. Palladino, M.A.; Fasano, G.A.; Patel, D.; Dugan, C.; London, M. Effects of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation on Hypoxia and Inflammatory Gene Expression Pathways of the Rat Testis. Basic Clin. Androl.; 2018; 28, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-018-0079-x]
129. Winnall, W.R.; Hedger, M.P. Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of the Testicular Macrophage Population: A New Regulatory Model. J. Reprod. Immunol.; 2013; 97, pp. 147-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2013.01.001]
130. Murphy, K.; Carvajal, L.; Medico, L.; Pepling, M. Expression of Stat3 in Germ Cells of Developing and Adult Mouse Ovaries and Testes. Gene Expr. Patterns; 2005; 5, pp. 475-482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.modgep.2004.12.007]
131. Nagasawa, K.; Imura-Kishi, K.; Uchida, A.; Hiramatsu, R.; Kurohmaru, M.; Kanai, Y. Regionally Distinct Patterns of STAT3 Phosphorylation in the Seminiferous Epithelia of Mouse Testes. Mol. Reprod. Dev.; 2018; 85, pp. 262-270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22962] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29393534]
132. Saxena, N.K.; Vertino, P.M.; Anania, F.A.; Sharma, D. Leptin-Induced Growth Stimulation of Breast Cancer Cells Involves Recruitment of Histone Acetyltransferases and Mediator Complex to CYCLIN D1 Promoter via Activation of Stat3. J. Biol. Chem.; 2007; 282, pp. 13316-13325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609798200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17344214]
133. Oatley, J.M.; Brinster, R.L. The Germline Stem Cell Niche Unit in Mammalian Testes. Physiol. Rev.; 2012; 92, pp. 577-595. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00025.2011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22535892]
134. Sisakhtnezhad, S.; Heshmati, P. Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data from Mouse Spermatogonial and Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Identify Differentially Expressed Genes and Transcriptional Regulators of Germline Cells. J. Cell Physiol.; 2018; 233, pp. 5231-5242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26303] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29194616]
135. Chen, J.-X.; Xu, L.-L.; Wang, X.-C.; Qin, H.-Y.; Wang, J.-L. Involvement of C-Src/STAT3 Signal in EGF-Induced Proliferation of Rat Spermatogonial Stem Cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem.; 2011; 358, pp. 67-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11010-011-0922-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21678081]
136. Haraguchi, S.; Ikeda, M.; Akagi, S.; Hirao, Y. Dynamic Changes in PStat3 Are Involved in Meiotic Spindle Assembly in Mouse Oocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 1220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041220]
137. Kominami, E.; Tsukahara, T.; Bando, Y.; Katunuma, N. Distribution of Cathepsins B and H in Rat Tissues and Peripheral Blood Cells. J. Biochem.; 1985; 98, pp. 87-93. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a135277]
138. Haraguchi, C.M.; Ishido, K.; Kominami, E.; Yokota, S. Expression of Cathepsin H in Differentiating Rat Spermatids: Immunoelectron Microscopic Study. Histochem. Cell Biol.; 2003; 120, pp. 63-71. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00418-003-0545-0]
139. Habasque, C.; Satie, A.-P.; Aubry, F.; Jégou, B.; Samson, M. Expression of Fractalkine in the Rat Testis: Molecular Cloning of a Novel Alternative Transcript of Its Gene That Is Differentially Regulated by pro-Inflammatory Cytokines. Mol. Hum. Reprod.; 2003; 9, pp. 449-455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gag059]
140. Truman, L.A.; Ford, C.A.; Pasikowska, M.; Pound, J.D.; Wilkinson, S.J.; Dumitriu, I.E.; Melville, L.; Melrose, L.A.; Ogden, C.A.; Nibbs, R. et al. CX3CL1/Fractalkine Is Released from Apoptotic Lymphocytes to Stimulate Macrophage Chemotaxis. Blood; 2008; 112, pp. 5026-5036. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-06-162404]
141. Ergün, S.; Kiliç, N.; Fiedler, W.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Its Receptors in Normal Human Testicular Tissue. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.; 1997; 131, pp. 9-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(97)00082-8]
142. Bott, R.C.; Clopton, D.T.; Fuller, A.M.; McFee, R.M.; Lu, N.; McFee, R.M.; Cupp, A.S. KDR-LacZ-Expressing Cells Are Involved in Ovarian and Testis-Specific Vascular Development, Suggesting a Role for VEGFA in the Regulation of This Vasculature. Cell Tissue Res.; 2010; 342, pp. 117-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-010-1038-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20848132]
143. Caires, K.C.; de Avila, J.; McLean, D.J. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Regulates Germ Cell Survival during Establishment of Spermatogenesis in the Bovine Testis. Reproduction; 2009; 138, pp. 667-677. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0020] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19633133]
144. Tian, R.; Yang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zou, S.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, Y.; He, Z.; Li, Z. VEGF/VEGFR2 Signaling Regulates Germ Cell Proliferation in Vitro and Promotes Mouse Testicular Regeneration in Vivo. Cells Tissues Organs; 2016; 201, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000440949] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26727223]
145. Fon Tacer, K.; Kalanj-Bognar, S.; Waterman, M.R.; Rozman, D. Lanosterol Metabolism and Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein (SREBP) Expression in Male Germ Cell Maturation. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2003; 85, pp. 429-438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00191-2]
146. Brown, M.S.; Goldstein, J.L. A Proteolytic Pathway That Controls the Cholesterol Content of Membranes, Cells, and Blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1999; 96, pp. 11041-11048. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041]
147. Osborne, T.F. Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Proteins (SREBPs): Key Regulators of Nutritional Homeostasis and Insulin Action. J. Biol. Chem.; 2000; 275, pp. 32379-32382. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R000017200]
148. Vannelli, B.G.; Orlando, C.; Barni, T.; Natali, A.; Serio, M.; Balboni, G.C. Immunostaining of Transferrin and Transferrin Receptor in Human Seminiferous Tubules. Fertil. Steril.; 1986; 45, pp. 536-541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49284-8]
149. Forti, G.; Barni, T.; Vannelli, B.G.; Balboni, G.C.; Orlando, C.; Serio, M. Sertoli Cell Proteins in the Human Seminiferous Tubule. J. Steroid Biochem.; 1989; 32, pp. 135-144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4731(89)90154-4]
150. Petrie, R.G.; Morales, C.R. Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis of Testicular Transferrin by Germinal Cells of the Rat Testis. Cell Tissue Res.; 1992; 267, pp. 45-55. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00318690]
151. Bhattacharya, I.; Basu, S.; Pradhan, B.S.; Sarkar, H.; Nagarajan, P.; Majumdar, S.S. Testosterone Augments FSH Signaling by Upregulating the Expression and Activity of FSH-Receptor in Pubertal Primate Sertoli Cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.; 2019; 482, pp. 70-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2018.12.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30579957]
152. Lécureuil, C.; Staub, C.; Fouchécourt, S.; Maurel, M.C.; Fontaine, I.; Martinat, N.; Gauthier, C.; Daudignon, A.; Delaleu, B.; Sow, A. et al. Transferrin Overexpression Alters Testicular Function in Aged Mice. Mol. Reprod. Dev.; 2007; 74, pp. 197-206. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20523] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16998850]
153. Rondanino, C.; Maouche, A.; Dumont, L.; Oblette, A.; Rives, N. Establishment, Maintenance and Functional Integrity of the Blood-Testis Barrier in Organotypic Cultures of Fresh and Frozen/Thawed Prepubertal Mouse Testes. Mol. Hum. Reprod.; 2017; 23, pp. 304-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gax017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28333312]
154. Smith, L.B.; Walker, W.H. The Regulation of Spermatogenesis by Androgens. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2014; 30, pp. 2-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.02.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24598768]
155. Jan, S.Z.; Jongejan, A.; Korver, C.M.; van Daalen, S.K.M.; van Pelt, A.M.M.; Repping, S.; Hamer, G. Distinct Prophase Arrest Mechanisms in Human Male Meiosis. Development; 2018; 145, dev160614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.160614]
156. Hung, A.J.; King, P.; Schlegel, P.N. Uniform Testicular Maturation Arrest: A Unique Subset of Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia. J. Urol.; 2007; 178, pp. 608-612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.125]
157. Jiao, S.-Y.; Yang, Y.-H.; Chen, S.-R. Molecular Genetics of Infertility: Loss-of-Function Mutations in Humans and Corresponding Knockout/Mutated Mice. Hum. Reprod. Update; 2021; 27, pp. 154-189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa034]
158. Gat, Y.; Gornish, M.; Chakraborty, J.; Perlow, A.; Levinger, U.; Pasqualotto, F. Azoospermia and Maturation Arrest: Malfunction of Valves in Erect Poster of Humans Leads to Hypoxia in Sperm Production Site. Andrologia; 2010; 42, pp. 389-394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01083.x]
159. Weedin, J.W.; Bennett, R.C.; Fenig, D.M.; Lamb, D.J.; Lipshultz, L.I. Early versus Late Maturation Arrest: Reproductive Outcomes of Testicular Failure. J. Urol.; 2011; 186, pp. 621-626. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.156]
160. França, L.R.; Hess, R.A.; Dufour, J.M.; Hofmann, M.C.; Griswold, M.D. The Sertoli Cell: One Hundred Fifty Years of Beauty and Plasticity. Andrology; 2016; 4, pp. 189-212. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12165]
161. Meng, J.; Holdcraft, R.W.; Shima, J.E.; Griswold, M.D.; Braun, R.E. Androgens Regulate the Permeability of the Blood-Testis Barrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2005; 102, pp. 16696-16700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506084102] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16275920]
162. Stanton, P.G. Regulation of the Blood-Testis Barrier. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2016; 59, pp. 166-173. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.06.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27353840]
163. Cooke, P.S.; Walker, W.H. Male Fertility in Mice Requires Classical and Nonclassical Androgen Signaling. Cell Rep.; 2021; 36, 109557. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109557] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407397]
164. De Gendt, K.; Swinnen, J.V.; Saunders, P.T.K.; Schoonjans, L.; Dewerchin, M.; Devos, A.; Tan, K.; Atanassova, N.; Claessens, F.; Lécureuil, C. et al. A Sertoli Cell-Selective Knockout of the Androgen Receptor Causes Spermatogenic Arrest in Meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2004; 101, pp. 1327-1332. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308114100] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14745012]
165. Syriou, V.; Papanikolaou, D.; Kozyraki, A.; Goulis, D.G. Cytokines and Male Infertility. Eur. Cytokine Netw.; 2018; 29, pp. 73-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1684/ecn.2018.0412] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547889]
166. Zhao, S.; Zhu, W.; Xue, S.; Han, D. Testicular Defense Systems: Immune Privilege and Innate Immunity. Cell Mol. Immunol.; 2014; 11, pp. 428-437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2014.38]
167. Arkoun, B.; Galas, L.; Dumont, L.; Rives, A.; Saulnier, J.; Delessard, M.; Rondanino, C.; Rives, N. Vitamin E but Not GSH Decreases Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation and Enhances Sperm Production during In Vitro Maturation of Frozen-Thawed Prepubertal Mouse Testicular Tissue. IJMS; 2019; 20, 5380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215380]
168. Yan, H.H.N.; Mruk, D.D.; Lee, W.M.; Cheng, C.Y. Blood-Testis Barrier Dynamics Are Regulated by Testosterone and Cytokines via Their Differential Effects on the Kinetics of Protein Endocytosis and Recycling in Sertoli Cells. FASEB J.; 2008; 22, pp. 1945-1959. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.06-070342]
169. Lie, P.P.Y.; Cheng, C.Y.; Mruk, D.D. Interleukin-1alpha Is a Regulator of the Blood-Testis Barrier. FASEB J.; 2011; 25, pp. 1244-1253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-169995]
170. Yáñez-Mó, M.; Siljander, P.R.-M.; Andreu, Z.; Zavec, A.B.; Borràs, F.E.; Buzas, E.I.; Buzas, K.; Casal, E.; Cappello, F.; Carvalho, J. et al. Biological Properties of Extracellular Vesicles and Their Physiological Functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles; 2015; 4, 27066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27066]
171. Hedger, M.P.; Meinhardt, A. Cytokines and the Immune-Testicular Axis. J. Reprod. Immunol.; 2003; 58, pp. 1-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0378(02)00060-8]
172. Pérez, C.V.; Theas, M.S.; Jacobo, P.V.; Jarazo-Dietrich, S.; Guazzone, V.A.; Lustig, L. Dual Role of Immune Cells in the Testis: Protective or Pathogenic for Germ Cells?. Spermatogenesis; 2013; 3, e23870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/spmg.23870] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23687616]
173. Winter, A.G.; Zhao, F.; Lee, R.K. Androgen Deficiency and Metabolic Syndrome in Men. Transl. Androl. Urol.; 2014; 3, pp. 50-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.01.04] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816752]
174. Ham, S.W.; Jeon, H.-Y.; Jin, X.; Kim, E.-J.; Kim, J.-K.; Shin, Y.J.; Lee, Y.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Seo, S. et al. TP53 Gain-of-Function Mutation Promotes Inflammation in Glioblastoma. Cell Death Differ.; 2019; 26, pp. 409-425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41418-018-0126-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29786075]
175. Jarvis, S.; Williamson, C.; Bevan, C.L. Liver X Receptors and Male (In)Fertility. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 5379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215379] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671745]
176. Liu, J.; Yan, J.; Jiang, S.; Wen, J.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, A. Site-Specific Ubiquitination Is Required for Relieving the Transcription Factor Miz1-Mediated Suppression on TNF-α-Induced JNK Activation and Inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 191-196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105176108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22184250]
177. Zahid, M.D.K.; Rogowski, M.; Ponce, C.; Choudhury, M.; Moustaid-Moussa, N.; Rahman, S.M. CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein Beta (C/EBPβ) Knockdown Reduces Inflammation, ER Stress, and Apoptosis, and Promotes Autophagy in OxLDL-Treated RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells. Mol. Cell Biochem.; 2020; 463, pp. 211-223. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11010-019-03642-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686316]
178. Zeng, R.-M.; Lu, X.-H.; Lin, J.; Hu, J.; Rong, Z.-J.; Xu, W.-C.; Liu, Z.-W.; Zeng, W.-T. Knockdown of FOXM1 Attenuates Inflammatory Response in Human Osteoarthritis Chondrocytes. Int. Immunopharmacol.; 2019; 68, pp. 74-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2018.12.057]
179. Zhou, M.; Shi, J.; Lan, S.; Gong, X. FOXM1 Regulates the Proliferation, Apoptosis and Inflammatory Response of Keratinocytes through the NF-ΚB Signaling Pathway. Hum. Exp. Toxicol.; 2021; 40, pp. 1130-1140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327120984225]
180. Clermont, Y. Kinetics of Spermatogenesis in Mammals: Seminiferous Epithelium Cycle and Spermatogonial Renewal. Physiol. Rev.; 1972; 52, pp. 198-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.198]
181. Peters, A.; Plug, A.; van Vugt, M.; de Boer, P. A Drying-down Technique for the Spreading of Mammalian Meiocytes from the Male and Female Germline. Chromosome Res. Int. J. Mol. Supramol. Evol. Asp. Chromosome Biol.; 1997; 5, pp. 66-68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018445520117] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9088645]
182. Milazzo, J.P.; Rives, N.; Mousset-Siméon, N.; Macé, B. Chromosome Constitution and Apoptosis of Immature Germ Cells Present in Sperm of Two 47,XYY Infertile Males. Hum. Reprod.; 2006; 21, pp. 1749-1758. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del051] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16497695]
183. Ishishita, S.; Matsuda, Y.; Kitada, K. Genetic Evidence Suggests That Spata22 Is Required for the Maintenance of Rad51 Foci in Mammalian Meiosis. Sci. Rep.; 2014; 4, 6148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06148] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25142975]
184. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast Universal RNA-Seq Aligner. Bioinformatics; 2013; 29, pp. 15-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635]
185. Pauli, A.; Valen, E.; Lin, M.F.; Garber, M.; Vastenhouw, N.L.; Levin, J.Z.; Fan, L.; Sandelin, A.; Rinn, J.L.; Regev, A. et al. Systematic Identification of Long Noncoding RNAs Expressed during Zebrafish Embryogenesis. Genome Res.; 2012; 22, pp. 577-591. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.133009.111]
186. Trapnell, C.; Roberts, A.; Goff, L.; Pertea, G.; Kim, D.; Kelley, D.R.; Pimentel, H.; Salzberg, S.L.; Rinn, J.L.; Pachter, L. Differential Gene and Transcript Expression Analysis of RNA-Seq Experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc.; 2012; 7, pp. 562-578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.016]
187. Chalmel, F.; Lardenois, A.; Evrard, B.; Rolland, A.D.; Sallou, O.; Dumargne, M.-C.; Coiffec, I.; Collin, O.; Primig, M.; Jégou, B. High-Resolution Profiling of Novel Transcribed Regions during Rat Spermatogenesis. Biol. Reprod.; 2014; 91, 5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.118166]
188. Zimmermann, C.; Stévant, I.; Borel, C.; Conne, B.; Pitetti, J.-L.; Calvel, P.; Kaessmann, H.; Jégou, B.; Chalmel, F.; Nef, S. Research Resource: The Dynamic Transcriptional Profile of Sertoli Cells during the Progression of Spermatogenesis. Mol. Endocrinol.; 2015; 29, pp. 627-642. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2014-1356]
189. Pertea, M.; Kim, D.; Pertea, G.M.; Leek, J.T.; Salzberg, S.L. Transcript-Level Expression Analysis of RNA-Seq Experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc.; 2016; 11, pp. 1650-1667. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.095]
190. Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. J. Stat. Soft.; 2008; 25, pp. 1-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01]
191. Chalmel, F.; Primig, M. The Annotation, Mapping, Expression and Network (AMEN) Suite of Tools for Molecular Systems Biology. BMC Bioinform.; 2008; 9, 86. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-86] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18254954]
192. Bustin, S.A.; Benes, V.; Garson, J.A.; Hellemans, J.; Huggett, J.; Kubista, M.; Mueller, R.; Nolan, T.; Pfaffl, M.W.; Shipley, G.L. et al. The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin. Chem.; 2009; 55, pp. 611-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246619]
193. Gong, Z.-K.; Wang, S.-J.; Huang, Y.-Q.; Zhao, R.-Q.; Zhu, Q.-F.; Lin, W.-Z. Identification and Validation of Suitable Reference Genes for RT-QPCR Analysis in Mouse Testis Development. Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2014; 289, pp. 1157-1169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-014-0877-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24952483]
194. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods; 2001; 25, pp. 402-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11846609]
195. Darde, T.A.; Sallou, O.; Becker, E.; Evrard, B.; Monjeaud, C.; Le Bras, Y.; Jégou, B.; Collin, O.; Rolland, A.D.; Chalmel, F. The ReproGenomics Viewer: An Integrative Cross-Species Toolbox for the Reproductive Sci.ence Community. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2015; 43, pp. W109-W116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv345] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25883147]
196. Darde, T.A.; Lecluze, E.; Lardenois, A.; Stévant, I.; Alary, N.; Tüttelmann, F.; Collin, O.; Nef, S.; Jégou, B.; Rolland, A.D. et al. The ReproGenomics Viewer: A Multi-Omics and Cross-Species Resource Compatible with Single-Cell Studies for the Reproductive Sci.ence Community. Bioinformatics; 2019; 35, pp. 3133-3139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz047] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668675]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Chalmel, Frédéric 2
; Delessard, Marion 1 ; Moutard, Laura 1
; Pereira, Tony 3
; Fraissinet, François 3
; Dumont, Ludovic 1
; Rives-Feraille, Aurélie 1 ; Rondanino, Christine 1
; Rives, Nathalie 1 1 INSERM, U1239, Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology Team, Laboratory of Neuroendocrine Endocrine and Germinal Differentiation and Communication, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Normandy University, 76000 Rouen, France;
2 Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, 35000 Rennes, France;
3 Department of General Biochemistry, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France;