Content area
Daucosterol is a saponin present in various natural sources, including medicinal plant families. This secondary metabolite is produced at different contents depending on species, extraction techniques, and plant parts used. Currently, daucosterol has been tested and explored for its various biological activities. The results reveal potential pharmacological properties such as antioxidant, antidiabetic, hypolipidemic, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, neuroprotective, and anticancer. Indeed, daucosterol possesses important anticancer effects in many signaling pathways, such as an increase in pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Bcl2, a decrease in the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, upregulation of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway, and distortion of cell-cycle progression and tumor cell evolution. Its neuroprotective effect is via decreased caspase-3 activation in neurons and during simulated reperfusion (OGD/R), increased IGF1 protein expression (decreasing the downregulation of p-AKT3 and p-GSK-3b4), and activation of the AKT5 signaling pathway. At the same time, daucosterol inhibits key glucose metabolism enzymes to keep blood sugar levels within normal ranges. Therefore, this review describes the principal research on the pharmacological activities of daucosterol and the mechanisms of action underlying some of these effects. Moreover, further investigation of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology are suggested.
Full text
1. Introduction
Daucosterol [(3β)-stigmast-5-en-3-yl β-D-glucopyranoside], a natural β-sitosterol glucoside, is a saponin phytosterol belonging to different families and genera found in several countries such as China, Vietnam, Mexico, Algeria, Tunisia, Italy, Iran, Cameroon, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Korea, and India [1,2,3,4].
Daucosterol is the major component of several plant extracts, namely Chinese Fallopia cillinerve root extract [1], Dendrobium huoshanense and Dendrobium officinale stem extract [5], and Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss aerial part extract [6]. In addition, this natural agent was found to be the main component of aerial part extracts of Centaurea resupinata subsp. dufourii [7] and Ononis mitissima L. [8] from Algeria. It was also detected at high concentrations in leaf and stem extracts of Prangos ferulacea from Iran [9], aerial part extracts of Cassia italic collected from Saudi Arabia [3], and leaf extracts of Ficus deltoidea from Indonesia [10] and Dioscorea batatas collected from Korea [11]. Furthermore, daucosterol is the principal component of aerial part extracts of Astragalus tanae found in Italy [12] and Landolphia owariensis collected from Nigeria [13], as well as whole plant and root extracts of Rheum turkestanicum from Iran [14,15]. Other investigations have reported high contents of daucosterol in plant extracts, namely Archidendron clypearia harvested in Vietnam [16] and Parasenecio pseudotaimingasa leaf extract [17] and Grewia optiva Drummond ex Burret stem bark extract in Pakistan [18].
Concerning the purification and isolation of daucosterol from plants, several methods have been used as spectroscopic techniques, including NMR and FT-IR, on the stems and leaves of Prangos ferulacea [9] and the aerial parts of Cassia italica [3] and Ononis mitissima L. [8]. NMR (1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) and mass spectroscopy (ESI–MS) have been used to elucidate daucosterol in Centaurea resupinata subsp. Dufourii [7]. This molecule has been elucidated from Dioscorea opposite with silica gel column chromatography (SGCC) using CHCl3-MeOH [19], from Phyllenthus emblica L. with thin layer chromatography (TLC) [20], from Portulaca oleracea L. [21] and Eriobotrya fragrans Champ [22] with 1H and 13C aided by HMQC, and from Arctotis arctotoides [23] using NMR (COSY, NOESY, HMQC, and HMBC) and mass spectra.
Several studies have highlighted the pharmacological properties of daucosterol, including chemopreventive [24,25,26], neuroprotective [27,28,29,30], antioxidant [7,8,9], anti-inflammatory [31], antidiabetic [32], inhibition and interactions of alpha-amylase by daucosterol from the peel of Chinese water chestnut [33], and immunomodulatory [34]. Immunoregulatory activity by daucosterol, a β-sitosterol glycoside, induces a protective Th1 immune response against disseminated Candidiasis in mice [35]. Regarding its chemopreventive potential, daucosterol was found to possess important anticancer activity on various tumor cell lines and could be considered as one of the novel pharmacological treatment strategies for cancer: for breast adenocarcinoma through different cellular and molecular mechanisms, such as an increase in pro-apoptotic protein Bax and Bcl2, a decrease in the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, upregulation of the PTEN gene, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome c (Cyt c) [36,37], repression of cell migration and invasion, and induction of cell death by cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis [38,39]; for lung cancer by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) level and promoting intrinsic apoptotic cell death on A549 cells mediated by increased expression of caspase-3, caspase-9, Bax, PARP inactivation, Cyt c release, and diminished bcl-2 protein expression; and for hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting the proliferation, migration, and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via Wnt/β-Catenin signaling [40]. Daucosterol has also been shown to exert a neuroprotective action by decreasing caspase-3 activation in neurons treated with oxygen–glucose deprivation and simulated reperfusion (OGD/R), as well as increasing the expression level of IGF1 protein, reducing the downregulation of p-AKT3 and p-GSK-3b4, thus activating the AKT5 signal pathway [28]. Further, daucosterol showed a neuroprotective property against H2O2-induced oxidative stress mediated through downregulation of MAPK pathways, minimizing ROS, and upregulation of antioxidant gene expression (HO-1, CAT, and SOD2) [41]. It could play a key role as an antioxidant by fighting against free radicals [3,8,9], which lead to a potential reduction of the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical. This molecule can also act as an antidiabetic agent; it could be considered a great candidate to prevent hyperglycemia due to its antidiabetic activity through the inhibition of α-glucosidase [42] and α-amylase enzymes [33]. In addition, this molecule has been shown to act as a promising anti-inflammatory drug that notably decreases nitric oxide (NO) content in different inflammatory tests [43,44]. Furthermore, other studies have demonstrated that daucosterol possesses immunomodulatory potential [34]. It was able to regulate the population and activation of immune cells, including Treg cells, macrophages, B1 cells, and NK cells in colitis mediated by suppressing the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-1β [31]. Further, this natural compound has shown potent lipolysis activity and could be used by physicians in the management of certain types of disease, thus conferring medicinal principles [35]. It was found to exhibit hypolipidemic actions with a sharp decrease in serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels [45] Nevertheless, daucosterol did not show antibacterial activity [23].
This review has attempted to compile a complete and current understanding of the origin, phytochemical, biological, and pharmacological process analysis of the daucosterol molecule, providing an overview to explain its mechanism of action (in vitro and in vivo) and its future applications in drug discovery, particularly for neuroprotective and chemopreventive effects.
2. Sources of Daucosterol
Daucosterol (Figure 1), a natural sterol, is a glucoside of β-sitosterol, mainly synthesized by plants (Table 1). Daucosterol is the major component of Chinese Fallopia cillinerve root extract [1], Dendrobium huoshanense stem extract, and Dendrobium officinale [5]. The richness of the compound depends on geographical factors and the plant part used. Hechtia glomerata Zucc from Mexico is characterized by its richness in daucosterol [2]. Additionally, daucosterol is the major compound in Crataegus gracilior flowers [46,47], Litsea cubeba extract [4], and Chinese plants Eleocharis dulcis [33] and Ipomoea batatas [25]. Other works have mentioned the richness of Cameroonian plants such as Crateva adansonii (stem bark and leaves) in this compound [24,48].
Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss aerial part extract showed that daucosterol is the major compound of this plant collected in China [6], as well as of Dioscorea batatas collected in Korea [11] and Ficus deltoidea leaf extract harvested from Indonesia [10]. Daucosterol is the major compound of the extract of Astragalus tanae aerial parts collected in Italy [12], of the fruit extract of Acanthopanax sessiliflorus (Rupr. and Maxim.), collected in China [49], of the aerial part extracts of Centaurea resupinata subsp. Dufourii [7] and Ononis mitissima L. [8] collected in Algeria. It has also been detected in the extracts of Prangos ferulacea leaves and stems collected in Iran [9] and the extract of Cassia italic aerial parts collected in Saudi Arabia [3].
Daucosterol is an isolate of different plants of the caprifoliaceae family harvested in China: Dipsacus chinensis, Dipsacus asperoides, Dipsacus japonicas, Dipsacus kangdigensis, and Dipsacus daliensis [50]. Analysis of Rheum turkestanicum whole plant and root extract showed that daucosterol is the major compound of this plant collected in Iran [14,15], of Heracleum persicum [15] and Landolphia owariensis collected from Nigeria [13], and of Streptocaulon griffithii [51] and Streptocaulon griffithii whole plant extract [51].
Richness in daucosterol has also been recorded in other plant extracts, namely Archidendron clypearia collected in Vietnam [16], Shibataea chinensis Nakai leaves from China [52], and Morus alba leaves from Korea [35]. Likewise, other extracts have been characterized by the dominance of this compound, such as the roots of Geranium collinum [53] and the leaves of Lasianthus hartii [54], Salvia syriaca, Sedum caeruleum, Adenophora triphylla, Pulicaria inuloides, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Salvia officinalis, and Rosa canina L. [27,28,55,56,57,58].
Indeed, daucosterol is the major compound of many plant extracts, such as extracts of the whole plant Clematis heracleifolia collected in Korea [59], aerial parts of Dorema glabrum Fisch. and C.A. Mey. collected in Iran [60], Artemisia apiacea [34,61], seeds of Juglans regia [28], peels and pulps of Pyrus spp. [62], salvia sahendica, Punica granatum, Helicteres isora L., Ceiba pentandra L., Eria spicata, Lysimachia clethroides, and Randia dumetorum [63,64,65,66,67,68].
Daucosterol has been isolated from Litchi chinensis seed extract [69], Parasenecio pseudotaimingasa leaf extract [17], Grewia optiva Drummond ex Burret stem bark extract collected in Pakistan [18], Urtica angustifolia leaf, root, and stem extracts [70], and Salvia limbata aerial part extracts from Iran, Turkey, and Afghanistan [71]. Further, it has been found in stem extracts of Lindera glauca [72], Sphallerocarpus gracilis, Hypericum ascyron L., Paeonia lactiflora, Paeonia suffruticosa, Alangium kurzi, Boerhaavia diffusa, and Cassia mimosoides var. [72,73,74,75,76,77,78].
Furthermore, daucosterol is among the major compounds of Phyllenthus emblica L. [20], Mitragyna speciose [79], Astragalus membranaceus [80], stem bark and twig extracts of Bennettiodendron leprosipes [81], Flacourtia ramontchi [81], Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Müll. Arg. [82], Flueggea virosa [83], Eriobotrya fragrans [22], Portulaca oleracea L. [21], Pteridium aquilinum [84], and Brassica campestris ssp rapa [85].
This has also been observed with extracts of Penthorum chinense, Arctotis arctotoides, Selinum cryptotaenium, Embelia ribes, Punica granatum, Dioscorea opposita, Junellia aspera, Sitophilus oryzae, Astragalus mongholicus Bunge, Hemiphragma heterophyllum, Dendrobium moniliforme, Punica granatum, Nepeta cataria L. var. citriodora [19,23,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95], Euphorbia altotibetic [96], Rhodiola sachalinensis roots [97], Gnetum montanum [98], and Ajania fruticulosa aerial parts.
Table 1Sources of Daucosterol.
| Plant |
Country | Parts Used | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fallopia cillinerve |
China | Roots | [1] |
| Litsea cubeba |
Vietnam | Not reported | [4] |
| Hechtia glomerata Zucc |
Mexico | Leaves | [2] |
| Eleocharis dulcis |
China | Not reported | [33] |
| Ipomoea batatas |
China | Not reported | [25] |
| Dendrobium huoshanense |
China | Stems | [5] |
| Dendrobium officinale |
|||
| Crataegus gracilior |
Mexico | Flowers | [46] |
| Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss. |
China | Aerial parts | [6] |
| Ficus deltoidea |
Indonesia | Leaves | [10] |
| Dioscorea batatas |
Korea | Not reported | [11] |
| Crateva adansonii |
Cameroon | Stem bark | [24] |
| Leaves | [48] | ||
| Astragalus tanae |
Italy | Aerial parts | [12] |
| Acanthopanax sessiliflorus (Rupr. and Maxim.) Seem. |
China | Fruits | [49] |
| Centaurea resupinata subsp. dufourii |
Algeria | Aerial parts | [7] |
| Ononis mitissima L. |
Algeria | Aerial parts | [8] |
| Prangos ferulacea |
Iran | Leaves and stems | [9] |
| Cassia italica |
Saudi Arabia | Aerial parts | [3] |
| Dipsacus chinensis |
China | Roots | [50] |
| Dipsacus asperoides |
|||
| Dipsacus japonicas |
|||
| Dipsacus kangdigensis |
|||
| Dipsacus daliensis |
|||
| Rheum turkestanicum |
Iran | Whole plant |
[14,15] |
| Heracleum persicum |
Iran | Whole plant | [15] |
| Landolphia owariensis |
Nigeria | Leaves | [13] |
| Streptocaulon griffithii |
China | Not reported | [51] |
| Streptocaulon griffithii |
China | Whole plant | [51] |
| Archidendron clypearia |
Vietnam | Whole plant | [16] |
| Shibataea chinensis Nakai |
China | Leaves | [52] |
| Morus alba |
Korea | Leaves | [35] |
| Geranium collinum |
China | Roots | [53] |
| Lasianthus hartii |
China | Leaves | [54] |
| Salvia syriaca |
Iran | Roots | [55] |
| Sedum caeruleum |
Algeria | Aerial parts | [56] |
| Adenophora triphylla |
Korea | Not reported | [27] |
| Pulicaria inuloides |
Yemen | Aerial parts | [57] |
| Salvia miltiorrhiza |
China | Roots | [28] |
| Salvia officinalis |
China | Roots | [28] |
| Rosa canina L. |
Iran | Fruits | [58] |
| Dorema glabrum Fisch. and C.A. Mey. |
Iran | Aerial parts | [60] |
| Clematis heracleifolia |
Korea | Whole plant | [59] |
| Artemisia apiacea |
Korea | Not reported | [61,99] |
| Pyrus spp. |
China | Peels and pulps | [62] |
| Salvia sahendica |
Iran | Aerial parts | [36] |
| Punica granatum |
Tunisia | Flowers | [64] |
| Helicteres isora L. |
India | Fruits | [65] |
| Ceiba pentandra L. |
Seeds | ||
| Eria spicata |
China | Whole plant | [68] |
| Lysimachia clethroides |
China | Aerial parts | [66] |
| Randia dumetorum |
Not reported | Bark | [67] |
| Litchi chinensis |
China | Seeds | [69] |
| Parasenecio pseudotaimingasa |
Korea | Leaves | [17] |
| Grewia optiva Drummond ex Burret |
Pakistan | Stem bark | [18] |
| Urtica angustifolia |
China | Leaves, roots, and stems | [74] |
| Salvia limbata |
Iran, Turkey, and Afghanistan | Aerial parts | [71] |
| Lindera glauca |
Korea | Stems | [72] |
| Sphallerocarpus gracilis |
China | Roots | [73] |
| Hypericum ascyron L. |
China | Whole plant | [74] |
| Paeonia lactiflora |
Korea | Roots | [75] |
| Paeonia suffruticosa |
Root bark | ||
| Alangium kurzi |
Indonesia | Stem bark | [76] |
| Boerhaavia diffusa |
Nigeria | Leaves | [77] |
| Cassia mimosoides var. nomame Makino |
Korea | Seeds | [78] |
| Phyllenthus emblica L. |
China | Fruits | [20] |
| Mitragyna speciosa |
America | Leaves | [79] |
| Astragalus membranaceus |
Korea | Roots | [80] |
| Bennettiodendron leprosipes |
China | Stem bark and twigs | [81] |
| Flacourtia ramontchi |
Bark and twigs | ||
| Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Müll. Arg. |
Belgium | Leaves and root bark | [82] |
| Flueggea virosa |
China | Twigs and leaves | [83] |
| Eriobotrya fragrans Champ |
China | Fruits and leaves | [22] |
| Portulaca oleracea L. |
Egypt | Not reported | [21] |
| Pteridium aquilinum |
China | Not reported | [84] |
| Brassica campestris ssp rapa |
Korea | Roots | [85] |
| Penthorum chinense |
China | Whole plant | [86] |
| Arctotis arctotoides |
Not reported | Not reported | [23] |
| Selinum cryptotaenium |
China | Roots | [87] |
| Embelia ribes |
China | Roots | [88] |
| Punica granatum |
China | Flowers | [89] |
| Dioscorea opposita |
China | Aerial parts | [19] |
| Junellia aspera |
Spain | Aerial parts | [90] |
| Sitophilus oryzae |
Not reported | ||
| Astragalus mongholicus Bunge |
China | Roots | [91] |
| Hemiphragma heterophyllum |
China | Whole plant | [92] |
| Dendrobium moniliforme |
China | Stems | [95] |
| Punica granatum |
China | Seeds | [93] |
| Nepeta cataria L. var. citriodora |
Poland | Seeds | [94] |
| Euphorbia altotibetic |
China | Whole plant | [96] |
| Rhodiola sachalinensis |
Korea | Roots | [97] |
| Gnetum montanum |
China | Not reported | [98] |
| Ajania fruticulosa |
China | Aerial parts | [100] |
| Rhodiola fastigiata |
China | Rhizomes | [101] |
| Jatropha curcas |
China | Roots | [102] |
| Gentiana algida |
China | Whole plant | [103] |
| Gentiana siphonantha |
China | Rhizomes and roots | [104] |
| Gentiana scabra Bunge |
China | Roots | [105] |
| Rabdosia coetsa |
China | Leaves | [106] |
| Artemisia sieversiana |
China | Aerial parts | [105] |
| Inula racemosa |
Roots | ||
| Amanoa oblongifolia |
Peru | Stem bark | [107] |
| Rhodiola rosea L. |
Russia | Rhizomes | [108] |
| Acanthopanax sessiliflorum |
Not reported | Roots | [109] |
| Leaves |
3. Extraction and Characterization
Many research groups have isolated and purified daucosterol from various medicinal plants [3,7,49], as showed in Table 2.
Spectroscopic techniques such as NMR, FT-IR, and elemental analysis have been used to elucidate the structure of daucosterol isolated and purified from the leaves and stems of Prangos ferulacea [9], as well as the aerial parts of Cassia italica [3] and Ononis mitissima L. [8]. NMR techniques (1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) and mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) have also been used to elucidate this molecule from Centaurea resupinata subsp. Dufourii [7], while spectroscopic techniques such as ESI/MS, 1H- and 13C-NMR have been used for its purification from the fruit of Acanthopanax sessiliflorus (Rupr. and Maxim.) Seem. [49]; SGCC with further purification with MeOH was the characterization method for Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss. aerial parts [6]. Similarly, daucosterol was elucidated from many plants such as Rheum turkestanicum [14], Morus alba using NMR by 1H, 13C, DEPT, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC NMR [35], and from Pulicaria inuloides [57], Salvia syriaca [55], Adenophora triphylla using 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR; and electron-impact (EI) mass spectra [27] for Sedum caeruleum [56], Rosa canina L. [58], Dorema glabrum Fisch. and C.A. Mey. [60], Salvia sahendica [36], Pyrus spp., Punica granatum, Helicteres isora L., and Ceiba pentandra L. [62,64,65]. The complete interpretation of 1H and 13C NMR spectra using 2D NMR (HSQC, HMBC, and DQF-COSY) allowed the identification of daucosterol in extracts of Litchi chinensis [69], Randia dumetorum [67], and Lysimachia clethroides [66]. TLC, IR, and ESI-MS spectra have been used for identification in Sphallerocarpus gracilis [73] and Hypericum ascyron L. [74].
It was obtained from Grewia optiva Drummond ex Burret [18], Boerhaavia diffusa [77], and Astragalus membranaceus [80] using 1D and 2D NMR (HMQC, HMBC, COSY, NOESY, and J-resolved) with EI and HRMS; from Phyllenthus emblica L. [20] using SGCC and thin-layer chromatography (TLC); and from Portulaca oleracea L. [21] and Eriobotrya fragrans Champ [22] using 1H and 13C aided with HMQC. Besides, daucosterol was found in Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Müll. Arg. [82] and Arctotis arctotoides [23] using NMR (COSY, NOESY, HMQC and HMBC). Daucosterol was eluted from Dioscorea opposite with SGCC using CHCl3-MeOH [19], with 13C-NMR from Astragalus mongholicus Bunge and Punica granatum [91,93], and with a combination of spectral methods (IR, EIMS, H and 2CNMR, DEPT, COSY, NOESY, and HETCOR) from Artemisia sieversiana [105].
4. Evaluation of Biological Properties
4.1. Antioxidant Activity
Daucosterol is an antioxidant molecule with an essential role in the fight against free radicals (Table 3). Abdollahnezhad et al. [9] demonstrated that this constituent has potent antioxidant properties, with significant activity using the DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical assay. Indeed, it showed a potential reduction of DPPH radicals, with 50% of inhibition (IC50 = 490 ± 2.9 µg/mL) and a percentage inhibition of 19.7% at 100 mg/mL [3] and a potential reduction with IC50 = 27.3 ± 0.015 µg/mL in another, similar study [8]. Other methods such as H2O2, FTC, FRAP, and PPM showed DPPH radical inhibition equal to 31.18 ± 0.5%, 37.12 ± 0.44%, 122.23 ± 0.014 µg EAA/mg ex, and 16.44 ± 0.0012 µg EAA/mg ex, respectively [8]. Several studies have confirmed this potential for DPPH radical inhibition with varying results: IC50 = 36.263 ± 0.005 µg/mL [7], IC50 = 155.0 ± 0.5 μM [14], IC50 = 224.1 ± 8.2 µg/mL [60], IC50 = 6.0 ± 0.1 mg/L [64], EC50 > 250 µg/mL [69], IC50 = 11.42 ± 0.07 µg/mL [66], IC50 = 108.14 ± 9.54 µg GAE/ mL [73], and IC50 = 38.86 µg/mL [20]. However, Shomirzoeva and collaborators demonstrated that daucosterol does not affect the DPPH radical [6]. On the other hand, it inhibited the activity of the ABTS radical with a potential inhibition at 50% equal to 4.8 ± 0.04 mg/mL and a percentage inhibition of 27% at the concentration of 0.04 mg/mL [110], plus EC50 = 143.4 µg/mL [69], IC50 = 9.02 ± 0.11 µg/mL [66], IC50 = 1.66 ± 0.15 µmol TE/g of DW [73], and IC50 = 0.71 ± 0.01 µg/mL [20].
4.2. Anticancer Activity
Several works have shown that daucosterol possesses important anticancer activity on various tumor cell lines and could be considered one of the novel pharmacological treatment strategies for cancer (Table 4). Esmaeili et al. [36] isolated this molecule from Salvia sahendica to assess its apoptotic and anti-proliferative activity against human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cells using MTT assay, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage assay, and flow cytometry. They found that daucosterol inhibits cell proliferation and induces cytotoxicity in MCF-7 cells, including PARP proteolytic activity, DNA fragmentation, and cell morphological changes. Indeed, at 80 μM, maximum inhibition of cell growth and survival was approximately 60%. Anti-cancer drug mechanisms move from the subcellular to the molecular level by increasing the levels of the pro-apoptotic proteins (Bax and Bcl2) and decreasing the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, upregulating the PTEN gene to inhibit the PI3K/Akt pathway, inducing the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and by Cyt c release in breast cancer cells [110,112,113]. On the other hand, Zhao et al. [110] assessed the anticancer effect of daucosterol against human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and gastric cancer cell lines MGC803, BGC823, and AGS. The results demonstrated that this compound exerts an important antiproliferative activity against the studied cell lines, with IC50 values of 16.95, 19.96, 3.13, and 24.19 μM, respectively. This effect was induced by autophagy in a ROS-dependent manner. Wang et al. [38] recorded an IC50 value of 26.6 μM on human colon cancer cell line HCT-116. Daucosterol can repress cell migration and cell invasion in these cells and cause cell death by cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Indeed, it significantly inhibited the proliferation of human lung cancer cell line A549, with an IC50 value of 17.46 μg/mL targeting multiple checkpoints, including cell-cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and induction of cell apoptosis [112]. Using MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and 4T1 breast cancer cells, Han et al. [37] revealed that daucosterol exhibits antitumor activities, with an IC50 = 53.27 μg/mL on MCF-7 and IC50 > 1000 on MDA-MB-231 and 4T1. This molecule also inhibited tumor growth in vivo using MCF-7 xenografts in nude mice by decreasing the expression of Bcl-xl, Bcl-2, and XIAP, increasing Bax, Bad, inducing the activation of caspase-dependent apoptosis in tumor tissues, and inactivation of the upstream PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway. Moreover, Gao et al. [114] reported that daucosterol inhibits cell proliferation, induces cell-cycle arrest, and promotes autophagy-dependent apoptosis in human prostate cancer cell lines (PC3 and LNCap) via activation of JNK signaling. Indeed, this phytosterol strongly inhibited the growth of human lung cancer cell line A549, with an IC50 value of 20.9 μM, by increasing ROS levels and promoting intrinsic apoptotic cell death of A549 cells. This effect was mediated by increased expression of caspase-3, caspase-9, and Bax, PARP inactivation, Cyt c release, and diminished expression of bcl-2 protein (Figure 2) [26]. Recently, Han et al. [25] evaluated the antiproliferative effect of daucosterol extracted from sweet potatoes on three breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and 4T1) and nontumorigenic breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A using MTT assay. The results showed that this compound inhibited the proliferation of breast cancer MCF-7 cells by inactivating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway, but had only weak effects on the proliferation of MDA-MB-231, 4T1, and MCF-10A cells. Nguedia and coworkers [24] investigated antitumor effects in vivo using the environmental carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA). The results demonstrated that daucosterol reduced, at all doses, tumor volume as well as proteins and cancer antigen 1. It also exhibited an antioxidant effect by decreasing malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and increasing catalase activity. In another study, it inhibited LNCaP, DU145, and PC3 prostate carcinoma cell growth and proliferation via downregulated cell cycle proteins (cdk1, cdk2, pcdk1, cyclin A and B), downregulated anti-apoptotic proteins (Akt, pAKT, and Bcl-2), and upregulated the pro-apoptotic protein Bax [114,115,116]. On the other hand, the in vivo anticancer effect of daucosterol on primary tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis was studied using a BALB/c mouse model of a breast tumor. After 35 days of treatment, daucosterol suppressed primary tumor growth, reduced the number of lung metastases, and delayed the trend of increasing numbers of captured CTCs in the blood circulation [117]. Using a murine H22 hepatoma allograft model in ICR mice, Zhao et al. [110] showed that daucosterol treatment inhibits tumor growth in vivo by inducing intracellular ROS generation and subsequent autophagic cell death.
4.3. Neuroprotective Activity
Some studies have shown that daucosterol exhibits neuroprotective effects [29,30,40,41] (Table 5). Indeed, Jiang and collaborators [40] showed that this molecule exhibits a neuroprotective action that reduces neuronal loss and cell apoptosis by diminishing caspase-3 activation in oxygen–glucose deprivation and simulated reperfusion (OGD/R)-treated neurons. It also increased the expression level of IGF1 protein and diminished the downregulation of p-AKT3 and p-GSK-3b4, thus activating the AKT5 signal pathway. Moreover, daucosterol decreased the downregulation of the anti-apoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and Bcl-2 and diminished the expression level of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax. In another study, Chung et al. [41] investigated the neuroprotective effects of daucosterol on H2O2-induced cell death of human brain neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells using MTT and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays, annexin-V/PI double-staining, and flow cytometry. Therefore, daucosterol exhibited neuroprotective activity against H2O2-induced oxidative stress through downregulation of MAPK pathways, minimizing ROS, and upregulation of antioxidant genes (HO-1, CAT, and SOD2) (Figure 3). Moreover, oral administration of daucosterol ameliorated amyloid beta-induced learning and memory impairment in rats by inhibiting beta-amyloid-induced hippocampal ROS production, and prevented beta-amyloid-induced hippocampal neuronal damage and restored hippocampal synaptophysin expression level [29]. Recently, Zhang et al. [30] investigated the neuroprotective effects of daucosterol in a cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) rat model. Accordingly, daucosterol attenuated brain damage and neuronal cell apoptosis caused by I/R injury by upregulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and suppressing iNOS expression in the ischemic zone.
4.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity
Using in vivo inflammation experiments (e.g., xylene-induced ear edema and carrageenan-induced paw), edema could be mediated by inflammatory factors [118], such as serotonin, histamine, prostaglandins, and bradykinin. Huang et al. [119] investigated the anti-inflammatory activity of two sterols and two triterpenes extracted from Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd., including daucosterol, β-sitosterol, ursolic acid, and oleanolic acid. Mice treated orally with the isolated compounds showed significant dose-dependent inhibition of edema compared to control mice [119].
Daucosterol isolated from the leaves of Liriodendron chinensis could be a natural anti-inflammatory agent due to its strong inhibitory effect on the activated inflammatory cells. As observed in the experiment performed by Yang et al. [43], this compound could significantly decrease the NO content of LPS-induced rat peritoneal macrophages [43].
In another study, Kim et al. [120] used LPS-treated RAW 264.7 macrophage cells to assess the anti-inflammatory action of phytochemicals, including daucosterol, isolated from fermented bark of Acanthopanax sessiliflorus (FAS). The anti-inflammatory responses to FAS revealed decreased NO production and inhibition of COX-2, iNOS, collagenase, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) (Figure 4) [120]. Additionally, Bui et al. tested the anti-inflammatory activity of bioactive compounds, including daucosterol, extracted from Sanchezia speciosa Leonard’s leaf ethanol extract. This research reported that daucosterol might have anti-inflammatory action against heat-induced protein denaturation, with moderate inhibition (IC50 = 245.59 ± 3.17 µg/mL) compared to 3-methyl-1Hbenz[f]indole-4,9-dione, which exhibited the strongest inhibition (IC50 = 193.70 ± 5.24 µg/mL) [121].
The pharmacological effects of daucosterol as an anti-inflammatory agent isolated from the leaves and root bark of Alchornea cordifolia was also tested using a mouse ear edema model in the study carried out by Mavar-Manga and collaborators. At a dose of 90 g/cm2, daucosterol was found to be more active (50% inhibition)—along with acetyl aleuritolic acid, N1, N2 diisopentenyl guanidine, and N1,N2,N3-triisopentenyl guanidine—than indomethacin. However, β-sitosterol and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were less effective [82].
In addition, daucosterol could suppress dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Colitis is an inflammatory response of the large bowel, which may be of infectious or autoimmune origin [122]. Jang et al. [31] found daucosterol decreased DSS-induced ROS production and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β [31] (Figure 4). These outcomes indicate that daucosterol may be useful as a candidate in folk medicine and for adopting new therapeutics as an alternative for treating several inflammatory diseases associated with excessive NO production.
4.5. Immunomodulatory Effects
Recently, modulation of the immune system has become a promising way to treat several human pathologies. Indeed, the reactivity of our immune system can be decreased due to several risk factors. This decrease induces a disequilibrium between immune response and disorders, including pathogenic microbial infections. In several ways, reinforcement of the immune system can establish homeostasis and remove these disorders. Moreover, it is well established that regulatory T cells (Treg) have a significant contribution to managing immune homeostasis. In particular, some previous works have indicated that Treg cells possess an essential function in inhibiting colitis-induced inflammatory responses by regulating inflammation and suppressing the release of inflammatory cytokines through modulating different genes such as NF-κB, TNF-α, interleukins (IL-1 and IL-6), and chemokines [123].
Jang et al. investigated the immunomodulatory effects of daucosterol in a mouse model of DSS-induced colitis. This research demonstrated that this molecule could regulate the population and activation of immune cells, including Treg cells, macrophages, B1 cells, and NK cells in colitis. These cells are involved in several diseases (malignant tumors, infections, mucosal immunity, allergies, etc.). They also found that this bioactive compound suppresses ROS and colitis-induced inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-1β, and is associated with downregulation of macrophage infiltration and upregulation of Treg cell number [31].
To discover new immunoregulatory approaches using natural drugs isolated from medicinal plants to fight against illnesses caused by Candida albicans, Lee et al. evaluated the possible immunomodulatory activity of daucosterol against disseminated Candidiasis in mice by regulating the immune response. They observed that splenic CD4+ T cells (DSCD4T) in daucosterol-treated mice produce IFN-γ and IL-2 cytokines more abundantly than cytokines IL-4 and IL-10, inducing the polarization of CD4+ T cells towards a Th1-type immune response [34]. However, some studies reported that the release of Th1 cytokine would enhance host resistance to disseminated candidiasis by improving the killing capacity of different immune cells, including activated macrophages, NK cells, and cytotoxic T cells against cells infected with C. albicans [124,125]. Furthermore, Yang et al. [40] proved the immunocompetent activity of daucosterol isolated from the leaves of Liriodendron chinensis. They demonstrated that daucosterol, among other bioactive compounds, markedly decreased the NO content of LPS-induced rat peritoneal macrophages and decreased splenic lymphocyte proliferation in mice [43]. These assessments could pave the way for new immunoregulatory strategies exerted by this biologically active compound for the treatment of numerous immunologic pathologies.
4.6. Antidiabetic Activity
Daucosterol extracted from the chloroform fraction of Swertia longifolia Boiss., was tested among other examined compounds in the study performed by Saeidnia and collaborators (Table 6). The results showed that daucosterol had the highest inhibitory activity against the digestive enzyme α-amylase (57.5 ± 3.1% in a 10 mg/mL) [126]. In the same context, the inhibitory activity of daucosterol purified from the peel of Chinese water chestnuts was evaluated in the study conducted by Gu et al. [33] against the same enzyme (Table 6). Using fluorescence quenching, enzyme inhibition, and molecular docking models, results showed that three saponins from Chinese water chestnut bark exhibit a potent α-amylase inhibitory effect, and that daucosterol was the major inhibitory factor of this enzyme with a mixed-mode [33].
To find effective strategies for the treatment of diabetes using α-glucosidase inhibitors, Sheng et al. [42] assessed the antidiabetic effect of five natural drugs isolated from the flowers of Musa spp. (Baxijiao), including ferulic acid, vanillic acid, β-sitosterol, daucosterol, and 9-(4′-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methoxyphenalen-1-one, against this enzyme. Daucosterol exhibited an excellent α-glucosidase inhibitory action, with an IC50 value of 247.35 mg/L and an inhibition constant of 2.34 mg/L. β-sitosterol and 9-(4ꞌ-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methoxyphenalen-1-one also showed potent α-glucosidase inhibiting activity [42]. Similarly, Numonov and colleagues investigated the antidiabetic effect of ten bioactive compounds, including daucosterol isolated from the root of Geranium collinum [53]. Using molecular docking, they observed that daucosterol could play a key role in inhibiting human α-glucosidase, while polyphenolic agents are probably involved in inhibiting PTP-1B.
On the other hand, Ivorra and collaborators investigated the possible effects of daucosterol and its aglycone (β-sitosterol) as an antihyperglycemic and insulin releaser [128]. The action of these agents on plasma insulin and glucose levels in normal and hyperglycemic rats after oral treatment was found to increase fasting plasma insulin levels. Additionally, they noted that both compounds enhance oral glucose tolerance and improve glucose-induced insulin release. In addition, Asghari et al. [58] tested the capacity of D-glucono-1,4-lactone and daucosterol isolated from Rosa canina fruits to inhibit α-glucosidase using the substrate p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG). The findings revealed that both agents contribute to the inhibition of α-glucosidase with a high effect; the IC50 values of D-glucono-1,4-lactone and daucosterol on yeast α-glucosidase were 6.5 ± 2.0 and 13.3 ± 1.9 µM, respectively [58].
From the perspective of characterizing and isolating the antidiabetic molecules present in the leaves of Costus pictus, Benny et al. [128] observed that β-sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucoside extracted from Costus pictus leaves exhibited a significant dose-dependent hypoglycemic action in rats after enteric coating compared to the uncoated compound [128]. The inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase in vitro and the increase in postprandial glycemia in maltose-loaded mice by the saponin component of Eleocharis dulcis bark were investigated in a recent study by Gu et al. [33]. Using NMR spectroscopy, three saponins were detected: campesterol glucoside, daucosterol, and stigmasterol glucoside. All three saponins were found to exert potent α-glucosidase inhibition, with IC50 values of 10.03 mg/L (campesterol glucoside), 7.68 mg/L (stigmasterol glucoside), and 5.67 mg/L (daucosterol), which were notably greater than that of acarbose (91.50 mg/L). Further, daucosterol showed the greatest inhibitory capacity against α-glucosidase [33]. Based on these findings, daucosterol could be considered an excellent candidate to prevent hyperglycemia due to its antidiabetic activity through the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase. However, further in vivo and in vitro investigations are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms involved.
4.7. Hypolipidemic Activity
In the objective to investigate the lipolysis effect of phytosterols isolated from mulberry (Morus alba) leaves, Li et al. observed that daucosterol exhibits a concentration-dependent lipolysis activity with very high potency. They also hypothesized that doctors could use daucosterol to manage certain types of disease, which can confer medicinal principles [35]. Sashidhara et al. [129] screened for natural resources with hypolipidemic activity in Bauhinia racemosa leaves using high-fat diet (HFD)-fed hamsters. The results showed that Bauhinia racemosa leaf ethanolic extract exhibits a strong hypolipidemic action due to its content of sitosterol-β-D-glucoside and other phytoconstituents, which could act additively or synergistically. The authors also indicated that Bauhinia racemosa leaf alcoholic extract rich in daucosterol could be used as a herbal drug to treat hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, a comprehensive approach to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia dyslipidemia management [129].
In addition, red yeast rice (RYR) used in traditional Chinese medicine could be an important product to prevent hyperlipidemia and dyslipidemia due to its content of more than 101 chemical agents, including daucosterol. According to experiments, RYR has been shown to significantly reduce total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels [130]. The underlying pathways of drug action involve increased mRNA levels of the farnesoid X receptor and peroxisome-proliferator-gamma-activated receptor, key receptors in cholesterol metabolism and bile acid homeostasis [131].
Khan and Hossain extracted two bioactive molecules, β-sitosterol glycoside and scopoletin, from Ipomoea digitate root ethanolic extract. The tuberous root of this plant, mainly used in traditional medicine, has been shown to exhibit hypolipidemic action, potently lowering serum total cholesterol and LDL-C [45]. In the in vivo study performed by Mironova and Kalashnikova [132] on animals suffering from hypercholesterolemia, treatment with β-sitosterol β-d-glucoside reduced β-lipoproteins by 46% and blood cholesterol by 31% while normalizing the cholesterol/phospholipid level, whereas administration of β-daucosterol did not affect the β-lipoprotein and cholesterol levels in the blood serum in control animals. In experimental hypercholesterolemia, the suspected mechanism of lipid-lowering activity of the drug is the stimulation of phospholipid synthesis [132]. Further studies investigating the hypolipidemic capacity of daucosterol are needed to clarify the different pathways implicated in this pharmacological property to prevent the various diseases associated with lipid disorders.
5. Limitations and Perspectives
Here we have reported the different natural sources and the benefits and pharmacological properties of daucosterol. According to the literature, this molecule exhibited remarkable biological activities in vitro and in vivo, and therefore may be a key candidate in drug development. Indeed, its anticancer and neuroprotective effects are promising; elucidating these different mechanisms of action may play a crucial role in the development of new drugs. However, different limitations of this study should be mentioned. The first is the lack of data related to pharmacodynamic action of daucosterol, which makes it difficult to trace and create clear molecular target pathways regarding its mechanism of action. The second limitation is related to the lack of studies assesses the toxicity and safety of daucosterol in vivo. Moreover, understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of daucosterol is necessary for its incorporation as a drug to treat many diseases; on the other hand, toxicological investigations are needed to validate its safety; the results of these investigations can also inform many approaches for the development of new drugs. Moreover, the investigation of daucosterol in combination with other drugs is also limited because no work has been reported in this direction.
Conceptualization, A.B. and T.B.; methodology, I.J. and N.E.M.; software, M.L.; F.E.K., validation, A.B., G.Z., S.P.B. and J.M.L.; formal analysis, A.B.; investigation, A.B. and N.E.O.; resources, S.B.; data curation, N.E.O.; writing—original draft preparation, N.E.O., I.J.; D.T.; and F.E.K., writing—review and editing, A.B., M.G. and D.M.; visualization, G.Z., S.P.B. and J.M.L.; supervision, A.B.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, M.G. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 4. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of Daucosterol. The arrow indicates increasing, decreasing or inhibiting.
Extraction and characterization of Daucosterol.
| Plant |
Parts Used | Extraction Method | Extraction Parameters | Purification Method | Yields | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prangos ferulacea |
Leaves and stems | Maceration | 750 g extracted by 3 L of n-hexane, dichloromethan, ethyl acetate, and methanol | NMR and FT-IR | - | [ |
| Cassia italica |
Aerial parts | Not reported | Not reported | NMR and HMBC | - | [ |
| Ononis mitissima L. |
Aerial parts | Not reported | Not reported | 1D and 2D NMR, mass spectrometry | - | [ |
| Centaurea resupinata subsp. dufourii |
Aerial parts | Not reported | Not reported | NMR techniques (1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY, HSQC, HMBC) and mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) | - | [ |
| Acanthopanax sessiliflorus (Rupr. and Maxim.) Seem. |
Fruits | Not reported | Not reported | Electro-spray ionization/mass spectrometry (ESI/MS), 1H- and 13C-NMR | - | [ |
| Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss. |
Aerial parts | Not reported | 17 kg were extracted in triplicate with EtOH (75%) at room temperature (50 L each time). |
Silica gel column chromatography (SGCC) and further purified with MeOH | 15 mg | [ |
| Rheum turkestanicum |
Roots | Maceration | 3.8 kg extracted with 8 L of n-hexane (24 h × 2) | 1H-, 13C-, 2D NMR, EI-MS, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction | - | [ |
| Morus alba |
Leaves | Ultrasound | 1933.76 g extracted in triplicate and successively with n-hexane, EtOAc, and MeOH in sonicator at room temperature (1 h) | NMR, using 1H, 13C, DEPT, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC NMR | - | [ |
| Pulicaria inuloides |
Aerial parts | Not reported | - | 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and HMQC | - | [ |
| Salvia syriaca |
Roots | Maceration | 2.2 kg of powdered material were extracted with acetone (3 × 10 L) by maceration at room temperature | Preparative thin layer chromatography (TLC) (CHCl3–MeOH (85:15)) | 45 mg | [ |
| Adenophora triphylla |
Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and EI mass spectra | - | [ |
| Sedum caeruleum |
Aerial parts | Not reported | 1500 g of powder was extracted with 80% MeOH. |
UV, 1D, 2D NMR, and MS | 7.2 mg | [ |
| Rosa canina L. |
Fruits | Maceration | 1.6 kg of powder was extracted with 4 L of n-hexane, ethyl acetate, acetone, and methanol | 1H- and 13C-NMR | - | [ |
| Dorema glabrum Fisch. and C.A. Mey. |
Aerial parts | Maceration | 0.8 kg was macerated with methanol (4 L × 5) at room temperature | UV and 1H, 13C-NMR | - | [ |
| Salvia sahendica |
Aerial parts | maceration | 3 kg extracted with Me2CO (7 × 5 L) | 1H and 13C NMR | - | [ |
| Pyrus spp. |
Peels and pulps | Not reported | 10 g extracted with methanol: water (6:4), acid (solvent A) and 1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B) | - | - | [ |
| Punica granatum |
Flowers | Not reported | 5 g of powder was extracted with 80% ethanol | - | - | [ |
| Helicteres isora L. |
Fruits | Not reported | Powdered material was extracted by stirring with 50 mL of 50% methanol at 25 °C for 24 h and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min. |
- | - | [ |
| Ceiba pentandra L. |
Seeds | Not reported | Powdered material was extracted by stirring with 50 mL of 50% methanol at 25 °C for 24 h and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min. |
- | - | [ |
| Litchi chinensis |
Seeds | Not reported | 10 kg exhaustively extracted three times with 95% ethanol (50 L) at room temperature | - | - | [ |
| Randia dumetorum |
Bark | Not reported | - | 13C-NMR spectra using 2D NMR (HSQC, HMBC, and DQF-COSY) | [ |
|
| Lysimachia clethroides |
Aerial parts | Not reported | 6.75 kg extracted three times with 75% alcohol for 7 days at room temperature. |
1H and 13C NMR | - | [ |
| Urtica angustifolia |
Leaves, roots, and stems | Decoction | 1 kg was extracted with water (90 °C, 20 BV) 3 times (15 min/time) | TLC, IR, and ESI-MS spectral | - | [ |
| Sphallerocarpus gracilis |
Roots | Not reported | - | - | - | [ |
| Hypericum ascyron L. |
Whole plant | Not reported | 450 g was refluxed three times with petroleum ether, EtOAC, and MeOH for 2 h | 13C-NMR | 20.9 mg | [ |
| Grewia optiva Drummond ex Burret. |
Stem bark | Not reported | 7 kg was extracted three times with ethanol at room temperature. |
1D and 2D NMR (HMQC, HMBC, COSY, NOESY, and J-resolved) and EI and HRMS | 6 mg | [ |
| Boerhaavia diffusa |
Leaves | Maceration | 150 g extracted with 1 L of distilled water for 24 h | [ |
||
| Astragalus membranaceus |
Roots | Not reported | 17.8 kg was chopped into small pieces and refluxed with 70% ethanol for 3 h at 70–80 °C | - | - | [ |
| Phyllenthus emblica L. |
Fruits | Not reported | 1100 g extracted with 95% ethanol at room temperature for 7 days | SGCC and TLC | - | [ |
| Portulaca oleracea L. |
Not reported | Not reported | 1450 g extracted with CHCl3 | 1H and 13C aided with HMQC | - | [ |
| Eriobotrya fragrans Champ |
Fruits and leaves | Not reported | 4.5 kg extracted with 95% EtOH three times for 3 days with 2 shakings per day | 13C-NMR | 20.8 mg | [ |
| Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Müll. Arg. |
Leaves and root bark | Not reported | - | 1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 | - | [ |
| Arctotis arctotoides |
Not reported | NMR (COSY, NOESY, HMQC, and HMBC) and mass spectra | [ |
|||
| Dioscorea opposita |
Aerial parts | Not reported | 4 kg extracted with 95% ethanol under reflux. |
Silica gel column chromatography using CHCl3-MeOH mixtures (95:5 f 3:1) | 300 mg | [ |
| Astragalus mongholicus Bunge |
Roots | Maceration | 10 kg extracted with 90% ethanol at room temperature. |
13C-NMR | - | [ |
| Punica granatum |
Seeds | Not reported | 4 kg extracted with 95% ethanol under reflux. |
1H and 13C NMR | 205 mg | [ |
| Artemisia sieversiana |
Aerial parts | Not reported | 14 kg extracted twice for 37 h at room temperature with MeOH | Combination of spectral methods (IR, EIMS, H and 2CNMR, DEPT, COSY, NOESY, and HETCOR) | 64 mg | [ |
Antioxidant effects of Daucosterol.
| Methods Used | Key Results | References |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH | IC50 = 490 ± 2.9 µg/Ml | [ |
| DPPH | RSA% = 19.7% at 100 mg/mL | [ |
| DPPH | IC50 = 27.3 ± 0.015 µg/mL | [ |
| H2O2 | I% = 31.18 ± 0.5% | |
| FTC | I% = 37.12 ± 0.44% | |
| FRAP | EC50 = 122.23 ± 0.014 µg EAA/mg ex | |
| PPM | EC50 = 16.44 ± 0.0012 µg EAA/mg ex | |
| DPPH | IC50 = 36.263 ± 0.005 µg/mL | [ |
| DPPH | No effect | [ |
| DPPH | IC50 = 155.0 ± 0.5 μM | [ |
| DPPH | IC50 = 224.1 ± 8.2 µg/mL | [ |
| DPPH | IC50 = 6.0 ± 0.1 mg/L | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 4.8 ± 0.04 mg/mL | [ |
| ABTS | I% = 27% at 0.04 mg/mL | |
| FRAP | EC50 = 1.09 ± 0.12 mg/mL | |
| DPPH | EC50 > 250 µg/mL | [ |
| ABTS | EC50 = 143.4 µg/mL | |
| DPPH | IC50 = 11.42 ± 0.07 µg/mL | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 9.02 ± 0.11 µg/mL | |
| DPPH | IC50 = 108.14 ± 9.54 µg GAE/mL | [ |
| FRAP | IC50 = 4.91 ± 0.39 µmol Fe(II)/g of DW | |
| ABTS | IC50 = 1.66 ± 0.15 µmol TE/g of DW | |
| DPPH | IC50 = 38.86 µg/mL | [ |
| ABTS | IC50 = 0.71 ± 0.01 µg/mL |
Anticancer effects of Daucosterol.
| Cell Lines | Key Results | References |
|---|---|---|
| Human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 | Suppressed the proliferation of MCF-7 cells |
[ |
| Human breast cancer MCF-7 | IC50 = 16.95 μM |
[ |
| Gastric cancer MGC803 | IC50 = 19.96 μM |
|
| Gastric cancer BGC823 | IC50 = 3.13 μM |
|
| Gastric cancer AGS | IC50 = 24.19 μM |
|
| Human colon cancer HCT-116 | IC50 = 26.6 μM at 24 h |
[ |
| Human lung cancer A549 | Inhibited the proliferation of A549 cells |
[ |
| Human HCC HepG2; |
Reduced the proliferation of HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cells |
[ |
| Breast cancer MCF-7; |
IC50 = 53.27 μg/mL |
[ |
| Breast cancer MDA-MB-231 | IC50 > 1000 μg/mL | |
| Breast cancer 4T1 | IC50 > 1000 μg/mL |
|
| Nontumorigenic breast epithelial MCF-10A | No cytotoxicity | |
| Human prostate cancer (PC3 and LNCap) | Inhibited cell proliferation |
[ |
| Human lung cancer A549 | IC50 = 20.9 Μm |
[ |
| Breast cancer MCF-7; |
Induced cytotoxicity |
[ |
| MDA-MB-231 | Exhibited a weak effect on cell proliferation | |
| 4T1 nontumorigenic | Exhibited a weak effect on cell proliferation | |
| Breast epithelial MCF-10A | Exhibited a weak effect on cell proliferation | |
| 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in Wistar rats | Reduced tumor volume |
[ |
| Prostate carcinoma LNCaP | Inhibited cell growth and proliferation | [ |
| Prostate carcinoma DU145 | Inhibited cell growth and proliferation |
|
| Prostate carcinoma PC3 | Inhibited cell growth and proliferation |
|
| Breast tumor BALB/c mouse model | Suppressed primary tumor growth |
[ |
| Murine H22 hepatoma allograft model in ICR mice | Inhibited murine hepatoma H22 cell growth |
[ |
Neuroprotective effects of Daucosterol.
| Experimental Approaches | Key Results | References |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen–glucose deprivation/reperfusion-mediated injury in OGD/R model | Reduced neuronal loss and apoptotic rate |
[ |
| H2O2-induced cell death of human brain neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells | Inhibited cell death and LDH activity |
[ |
| Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) rat model | Decreased apoptotic cell death |
[ |
Antidiabetic activities of daucosterol.
| Experimental Approaches | Key Results | References |
|---|---|---|
| α-amylase inhibitors | Inhibition = 57.5 ± 3.1% in a 10 mg/mL | [ |
| α-glucosidase inhibitors | IC50 = 247.35 mg/L |
[ |
| Normal and hyperglycemic rats | Increased fasting plasma insulin levels |
[ |
| Molecular docking | Inhibited human α-glucosidase | [ |
| α-glucosidase inhibitors | IC50 = 13.3 ± 1.9 µM | [ |
| Glucose tolerance test | Significant hypoglycemic activity | [ |
| α-glucosidase inhibitors | IC50 = 5.67 mg/L | [ |
References
1. Cao, X.; Zhuang, H.; Jiang, H. Study on the Chemical Constituents of a Plant in the Soil of Taibai Mountain. Int. J. Sci.; 2021; 8, 4.
2. Stefani, T.; Morales-San Claudio, P.D.C.; Rios, M.Y.; Aguilar-Guadarrama, A.B.; González-Maya, L.; Sánchez-Carranza, J.N.; González-Ferrara, M.; Camacho-Corona, M. del R. UPLC–QTOF–MS Analysis of Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Extracts of Hechtia Glomerata Zucc. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2022; 36, pp. 644-648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2020.1793148] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674610]
3. Al-Haidari, R.A.; Al-Oqail, M.M. New Benzoic Acid Derivatives from Cassia Italica Growing in Saudi Arabia and Their Antioxidant Activity. Saudi Pharm. J.; 2020; 28, pp. 1112-1117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.07.012]
4. Quach, N.T.; Nguyen, Q.H.; Vu, T.H.N.; Le, T.T.H.; Ta, T.T.T.; Nguyen, T.D.; Van Doan, T.; Van Nguyen, T.; Dang, T.T.; Nguyen, X.C. et al. Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds Produced by Streptomyces Variabilis LCP18 Associated with Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers as Potential Target to Combat Human Pathogenic Bacteria and Human Cancer Cell Lines. Braz. J. Microbiol.; 2021; 52, pp. 1215-1224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00510-6]
5. Wan, J.; Gong, X.; Wen, C.; Wei, Y.; Kong, L.; Han, B.; Ouyang, Z. First Systematic Analysis for Chemical Composition by HPLC-ESI-MSn and Antioxidant Activity Comparison of Dendrobium Huoshanense and Dendrobium Officinale. Res. Sq.; 2020; in review [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-90757/v1]
6. Shomirzoeva, O.; Li, J.; Numonov, S.; Atolikshoeva, S.; Aisa, H.A. Chemical Components of Hyssopus Cuspidatus Boriss.: Isolation and Identification, Characterization by HPLC-DAD-ESI-HRMS/MS, Antioxidant Activity and Antimicrobial Activity. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2020; 34, pp. 534-540. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1488710]
7. Bouzghaia, B.; Moussa, M.T.B.; Goudjil, R.; Harkat, H.; Pale, P. Chemical Composition, in Vitro Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Centaurea Resupinata Subsp. Dufourii (Dostál) Greuter. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2021; 35, pp. 4734-4739. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2020.1715397]
8. Besbas, S.; Mouffouk, S.; Haba, H.; Marcourt, L.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Benkhaled, M. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antihemolytic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Ononis mitissima L. Phytochem. Lett.; 2020; 37, pp. 63-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2020.04.002]
9. Abdollahnezhad, H.; Bahadori, M.B.; Pourjafar, H.; Movahhedin, N. Purification, Characterization, and Antioxidant Activity of Daucosterol and Stigmasterol from Prangos Ferulacea. Lett. Appl. Biosci.; 2021; 10, pp. 2174-2180.
10. Murni, A.; Yuliansih, P.; Mohamad, K.; Kita, M.; Hanif, N. A Glucosylated Steroid from the Active Fraction of Indonesian Ficus Deltoidea Leaves. AIP Conf. Proc.; 2020; 2243, 030015. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0005210]
11. Park, M.-K.; Cho, S.; Ahn, T.-K.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, J.-W.; Kim, J.-I.; Seo, E.-W.; Son, K.-H.; Lim, J.-H. Immunomodulatory Effects of β-sitosterol and Daucosterol Isolated from Dioscorea batatas on LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 and TK-1 Cells. J. Life Sci.; 2020; 30, pp. 359-369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2020.30.4.359]
12. Kavtaradze, N.; Alaniya, M.; Masullo, M.; Cerulli, A.; Piacente, S. New Flavone Glycosides from Astragalus Tanae Endemic to Georgia. Chem. Nat. Compd.; 2020; 56, pp. 70-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10600-020-02946-y]
13. Ibekwe, N.N.; Akoje, V.O.; Igoli, J.O. Phytochemical Constituents of the Leaves of Landolphia Owariensis. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2019; 3, pp. 261-264. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v3i8.2]
14. Dehghan, H.; Salehi, P.; Amiri, M.S. Bioassay-Guided Purification of α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase Inhibitors and DPPH Radical Scavengers from Roots of Rheum Turkestanicum. Ind. Crops Prod.; 2018; 117, pp. 303-309. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.086]
15. Dehghan, H. Isolation of 17 Antidiabetic Compounds from Two Iranian Plants. Org. Agric.; 2019; Available online: http://herb.bonyadhamayesh.ir/fa/ (accessed on 29 April 2022).
16. Duong, N.T.; Vinh, P.D.; Thuong, P.T.; Hoai, N.T.; Thanh, L.N.; Bach, T.T.; Nam, N.H.; Anh, N.H. Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors from Archidendron Clypearia (Jack.) I.C. Nielsen: Results from Systematic Screening of Vietnamese Medicinal Plants. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med.; 2017; 10, pp. 549-556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtm.2017.06.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28756918]
17. Cho, E.J.; Choi, J.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, S. Isolation of Antibacterial Compounds from Parasenecio Pseudotaimingasa. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.; 2012; 53, pp. 561-564. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13580-012-0040-4]
18. Uddin, G.; Siddiqui, B.S.; Alam, M.; Sadat, A.; Ahmad, A.; Uddin, A. Chemical Constituents and Phytotoxicity of Solvent Extracted Fractions of Stem Bark of Grewia Optiva Drummond Ex Burret. Middle-East. J. Sci. Res.; 2011; 8, pp. 85-91.
19. Ma, C.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Liu, R.-N.; Wang, R.-F.; Du, L.-J. Neuroprotective and Antioxidant Activity of Compounds from the Aerial Parts of Dioscorea Opposita. J. Nat. Prod.; 2005; 68, pp. 1259-1261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np050021c]
20. Luo, W.; Zhao, M.; Yang, B.; Shen, G.; Rao, G. Identification of Bioactive Compounds in Phyllenthus emblica L. Fruit and Their Free Radical Scavenging Activities. Food Chem.; 2009; 114, pp. 499-504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.077]
21. Elkhayat, E.S.; Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Aziz, M.A. Portulene, a New Diterpene from Portulaca oleracea L. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.; 2008; 10, pp. 1039-1043. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10286020802320590]
22. Hong, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Lin, S.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, F. Characterization of Antioxidant Compounds in Eriobotrya Fragrans Champ Leaf. Sci. Hortic.; 2008; 118, pp. 288-292. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.06.018]
23. Sultana, N.; Afolayan, A.J. A Novel Daucosterol Derivative and Antibacterial Activity of Compounds from Arctotis Arctotoides. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2007; 21, pp. 889-896. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786410601129606]
24. Nguedia, M.Y.; Tueche, A.B.; Yaya, A.J.G.; Yadji, V.; Ndinteh, D.T.; Njamen, D.; Zingue, S. Daucosterol from Crateva Adansonii
25. Han, B.; Jiang, L.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, D.; Jia, X.; Li, X.; Ye, X. Daucosterol Linolenate from Sweet Potato Suppresses MCF7-Xenograft-Tumor Growth through Regulating PI3K/AKT Pathway. Planta Med.; 2020; 86, pp. 767-775. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1176-1884]
26. Rajavel, T.; Banu Priya, G.; Suryanarayanan, V.; Singh, S.K.; Pandima Devi, K. Daucosterol Disturbs Redox Homeostasis and Elicits Oxidative-Stress Mediated Apoptosis in A549 Cells via Targeting Thioredoxin Reductase by a P53 Dependent Mechanism. Eur. J. Pharmacol.; 2019; 855, pp. 112-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.04.051]
27. Chung, M.J.; Lee, S.; Park, Y.I.; Kwon, K.H. Antioxidative and Neuroprotective Effects of Extract and Fractions from Adenophora triphylla. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr.; 2016; 45, pp. 1580-1588. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.11.1580]
28. Jiang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Rupasinghe, H. The Anticancer Properties of Phytochemical Extracts from Salvia Plants. Bot. Targets Ther.; 2016; 6, pp. 25-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTAT.S98610]
29. Ji, Z.-H.; Xu, Z.-Q.; Zhao, H.; Yu, X.-Y. Neuroprotective Effect and Mechanism of Daucosterol Palmitate in Ameliorating Learning and Memory Impairment in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Steroids; 2017; 119, pp. 31-35. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2017.01.003]
30. Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Feng, C. Improvement of Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Daucosterol Palmitate-Induced Neuronal Apoptosis Inhibition via PI3K/Akt/MTOR Signaling Pathway. Metab. Brain Dis.; 2020; 35, pp. 1035-1044. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11011-020-00575-6]
31. Jang, J.; Kim, S.-M.; Yee, S.-M.; Kim, E.-M.; Lee, E.-H.; Choi, H.-R.; Lee, Y.-S.; Yang, W.-K.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, K.-H. et al. Daucosterol Suppresses Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS)-Induced Colitis in Mice. Int. Immuno Pharmacol.; 2019; 72, pp. 124-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2019.03.062]
32. Gu, Y.; Yang, X.; Shang, C.; Phuong Thao, T.T.; Koyama, T. Inhibitory Properties of Saponin from Eleocharis Dulcis Peel against α-Glucosidase. RSC Adv.; 2021; 11, pp. 15400-15409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02198B]
33. Gu, Y.; Yang, X.; Shang, C.; Thao, T.T.P.; Koyama, T. Inhibition and Interactions of Alpha-Amylase by Daucosterol from the Peel of Chinese Water Chestnut (Eleocharis dulcis). Food Funct.; 2021; 12, pp. 8411-8424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1FO00887K]
34. Lee, J.-H.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.H.; Jung, H.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kang, S.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Han, Y. Immunoregulatory Activity by Daucosterol, a β-Sitosterol Glycoside, Induces Protective Th1 Immune Response against Disseminated Candidiasis in Mice. Vaccine; 2007; 25, pp. 3834-3840. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.108]
35. Li, K.; Lee, M.L.; Que, L.; Li, M.; Kang, J.S.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, K.M.; Jung, J.-C.; Hwang, D.Y.; Choi, Y.W. Lipolysis Effect of Daucosterol Isolated from Mulberry (Morus alba) Leaves. J. Life Sci.; 2017; 27, pp. 1500-1506. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2017.27.12.1500]
36. Esmaeili, M.A.; Farimani, M.M. Inactivation of PI3K/Akt Pathway and Upregulation of PTEN Gene Are Involved in Daucosterol, Isolated from Salvia Sahendica, Induced Apoptosis in Human Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells. S. Afr. J. Bot.; 2014; 93, pp. 37-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2014.03.010]
37. Han, B.; Jiang, P.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, H.; Yu, Y.; Li, X.; Ye, X. Role of Daucosterol Linoleate on Breast Cancer: Studies on Apoptosis and Metastasis. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2018; 66, pp. 6031-6041. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01387]
38. Wang, G.-Q.; Gu, J.-F.; Gao, Y.-C.; Dai, Y.-J. Daucosterol Inhibits Colon Cancer Growth by Inducing Apoptosis, Inhibiting Cell Migration and Invasion and Targeting Caspase Signalling Pathway. Bangladesh J Pharm.; 2016; 11, 395. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v11i2.25754]
39. Mir, S.A.; Dar, L.A.; Ali, T.; Kareem, O.; Rashid, R.; Khan, N.A.; Chashoo, I.A.; Bader, G.N. A Review on Its Phytochemistry and Pharmacology. Edible Plants Health Dis.; 2022; pp. 327-348. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4959-2_10]
40. Zeng, J.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, B.; Xiao, Y. Daucosterol Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells via Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling. Molecules; 2017; 22, 862. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060862]
41. Chung, M.J.; Lee, S.; Park, Y.I.; Lee, J.; Kwon, K.H. Neuroprotective Effects of Phytosterols and Flavonoids from Cirsium Setidens and Aster Scaber in Human Brain Neuroblastoma SK-N-SH Cells. Life Sci.; 2016; 148, pp. 173-182. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.035]
42. Sheng, Z.; Dai, H.; Pan, S.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Ma, W. Isolation and Characterization of an α-Glucosidase Inhibitor from Musa spp. (Baxijiao) Flowers. Molecules; 2014; 19, pp. 10563-10573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules190710563]
43. Yang, N.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Immunological Activities of Components from Leaves of Liriodendron Chinensis. Chin. Herb. Med.; 2015; 7, pp. 279-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1674-6384(15)60051-X]
44. Taheri, Y.; Quispe, C.; Herrera-Bravo, J.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Ezzat, S.M.; Merghany, R.M.; Cho, W.C. Urtica dioica-derived phytochemicals for pharmacological and therapeutic applications. Evid.-Based Complem. Alter. Med.; 2022; 2022, 4024331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4024331]
45. Jain, V.; Verma, S.K.; Katewa, S.S. Therapeutic Validation of Ipomoea digitata Tuber (Ksheervidari) for its Effect on Cardio-Vascular Risk Parameters. Ind. J. Trad. Knowl.; 2011; pp. 617-623. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12823 (accessed on 29 April 2022).
46. Torres-Ortiz, D.A.; Eloy, R.; Moustapha, B.; César, I.-A.; Edmundo, M.-S.; Jesús Eduardo, C.-R.; Dulce María, R.-P. Vasorelaxing Effect and Possible Chemical Markers of the Flowers of the Mexican Crataegus Gracilior. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2020; 34, pp. 3522-3525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1577833]
47. Hernández-Pérez, A.; Bah, M.; Ibarra-Alvarado, C.; Rivero-Cruz, J.F.; Rojas-Molina, A.; Rojas-Molina, J.I.; Cabrera-Luna, J.A. Aortic relaxant activity of Crataegus gracilior Phipps and identification of some of its chemical constituents. Molecules; 2014; 19, pp. 20962-20974. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules191220962]
48. Zingue, S.; Gbaweng Yaya, A.J.; Michel, T.; Ndinteh, D.T.; Rutz, J.; Auberon, F.; Maxeiner, S.; Chun, F.K.-H.; Tchinda, A.T.; Njamen, D. et al. Bioguided Identification of Daucosterol, a Compound That Contributes to the Cytotoxicity Effects of Crateva Adansonii DC (Capparaceae) to Prostate Cancer Cells. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2020; 247, 112251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112251]
49. Chen, L.; Xin, X.; Feng, H.; Li, S.; Cao, Q.; Wang, X.; Vriesekoop, F. Isolation and Identification of Anthocyanin Component in the Fruits of Acanthopanax Sessiliflorus (Rupr. and Maxim.) Seem. by Means of High Speed Counter Current Chromatography and Evaluation of Its Antioxidant Activity. Molecules; 2020; 25, 1781. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081781]
50. CHEN Da-xia1, 2 Compare and Cluster Analysis of Six Chemical Constituents in Dipsacus Medicinal Plants. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev.; 2019; 30, 132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16333/j.1001-6880.2018.S.019]
51. Zhang, X.; Wang, K.-W.; Wang, H. Chemical Constituents of Streptocaulon Griffithii. Chem. Nat. Compd.; 2018; 54, pp. 803-805. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10600-018-2482-0]
52. Kuang, Y.; Yang, S.X.; Sampietro, D.A.; Zhang, X.F.; Tan, J.; Gao, Q.X.; Liu, H.W.; Ni, Q.X.; Zhang, Y.Z. Phytotoxicity of Leaf Constituents from Bamboo (Shibataea chinensis Nakai) on Germination and Seedling Growth of Lettuce and Cucumber. Allelopath. J.; 2017; 40, pp. 133-142. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26651/2017-40-2-1072]
53. Numonov, S.; Edirs, S.; Bobakulov, K.; Qureshi, M.N.; Bozorov, K.; Sharopov, F.; Setzer, W.N.; Zhao, H.; Habasi, M.; Sharofova, M. et al. Evaluation of the Antidiabetic Activity and Chemical Composition of Geranium Collinum Root Extracts—Computational and Experimental Investigations. Molecules; 2017; 22, 983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060983]
54. Yang, D.; Zhang, C.; Liu, X.-X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, K.; Cheng, Z.-Q. Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activity of Lasianthus Hartii. Chem. Nat. Compd.; 2017; 53, pp. 390-393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10600-017-2002-7]
55. Bahadori, M.B.; Dinparast, L.; Valizadeh, H.; Farimani, M.M.; Ebrahimi, S.N. Bioactive Constituents from Roots of Salvia Syriaca L.: Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity and Molecular Docking Studies. S. Afr. J. Bot.; 2016; 106, pp. 1-4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.12.003]
56. Bensouici, C.; Kabouche, A.; Karioti, A.; Öztürk, M.; Duru, M.E.; Bilia, A.R.; Kabouche, Z. Compounds from Sedum Caeruleum with Antioxidant, Anticholinesterase, and Antibacterial Activities. Pharm. Biol.; 2016; 54, pp. 174-179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2015.1028078]
57. Galala, A.A.; Sallam, A.; Abdel-Halim, O.B.; Gedara, S.R. New Ent-Kaurane Diterpenoid Dimer from Pulicaria Inuloides. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2016; 30, pp. 2468-2475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2016.1201671]
58. Asghari, B.; Salehi, P.; Farimani, M.M.; Ebrahimi, S.N. α-Glucosidase Inhibitors from Fruits of Rosa canina L. Rec. Nat. Prod.; 2015; 9, pp. 276-283.
59. Kim, M.A.; Kim, M.J.; Chun, W.; Kwon, Y. Chemical Constituents and Their Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity of Underground Parts of Clematis heracleifolia. Korean J. Pharmacogn.; 2015; 46, pp. 6-11.
60. Delnavazi, M.-R.; Hadjiakhoondi, A.; Delazar, A.; Ajani, Y.; Tavakoli, S.; Yassa, N. Phytochemical and Antioxidant Investigation of the Aerial Parts of Dorema Glabrum Fisch. and C.A. Mey. Iran. J. Pharm. Res.; 2015; 14, pp. 925-931.
61. Lee, J.; Weon, J.B.; Yun, B.-R.; Eom, M.R.; Ma, C.J. Simultaneous Determination Three Phytosterol Compounds, Campesterol, Stigmasterol and Daucosterol in Artemisia Apiacea by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Ultraviolet/Visible Detector. Pharm. Mag.; 2015; 11, pp. 297-303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1296.153082]
62. Li, X.; Wang, T.; Zhou, B.; Gao, W.; Cao, J.; Huang, L. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Peels and Flesh from 10 Different Pear Varieties (Pyrus spp.). Food Chem.; 2014; 152, pp. 531-538. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.010]
63. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Gao, M.; Gao, P.; Gao, D.; Zhang, H.; Qiao, M. Radix Ranunculi ternati: Review of its chemical constituents, pharmacology, quality control and clinical applications. J. Pharm Pharmacol.; 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpp/rgac018]
64. Bekir, J.; Mars, M.; Vicendo, P.; Fterrich, A.; Bouajila, J. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antiproliferation Activities of Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Flowers. J. Med. Food; 2013; 16, pp. 544-550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2012.0275]
65. Loganayaki, N.; Siddhuraju, P.; Manian, S. Antioxidant Activity and Free Radical Scavenging Capacity of Phenolic Extracts from Helicteres Isora L. and Ceiba Pentandra L. J. Food Sci. Technol.; 2013; 50, pp. 687-695. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0389-x]
66. Wei, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, W. Antioxidant and A-Glucosidase Inhibitory Compounds in Lysimachia Clethroides. AJPP; 2012; 6, pp. 3230-3234. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJPP12.1304]
67. Singh, R. Chemical investigation and in vitro cytotoxic activity of randia dumetorum lamk bark. Int. J. Chem. Sci.; 2012; 10, pp. 1374-1382.
68. Wang, L.; Wu, M.; Huang, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Yin, B. Chemical Constituents of Eria Spicata. Chem. Nat. Compd.; 2012; 48, pp. 168-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10600-012-0194-4]
69. Guo, J.; Chen, J.; Lin, L.; Xu, F. Five Chemical Constituents of the Ethyl Acetate Fraction from Ethanol Extract of Semen Litchi. JMPR; 2012; 6, pp. 168-170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.1299]
70. Zhang, H.; Yan, X.; Jiang, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhou, Y. The Extraction, Identification and Quantification of Hypoglycemic Active Ingredients from Stinging Nettle (Urtica angustifolia). Afr. J. Biotechnol.; 2011; 10, pp. 9428-9437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajb.v10i46]
71. Saeidnia, S.; Gohari, A.R.; Malmir, M.; Moradi, A.F.; Ajani, Y. Tryptophan and Sterols from Salvia limbata. J. Med. Plants; 2011; 10, pp. 41-47.
72. Huh, G.-W.; Park, J.-H.; Shrestha, S.; Lee, Y.-H.; Ahn, E.-M.; Kang, H.-C.; Baek, N.-I. Sterols from Lindera Glauca Blume Stem Wood. J. Appl. Biol. Chem.; 2011; 54, pp. 309-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2011.050]
73. Gao, C.; Lu, Y.; Tian, C.; Xu, J.; Guo, X.; Zhou, R.; Hao, G. Main Nutrients, Phenolics, Antioxidant Activity, DNA Damage Protective Effect and Microstructure of Sphallerocarpus Gracilis Root at Different Harvest Time. Food Chem.; 2011; 127, pp. 615-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.053]
74. Kang, W.-Y.; Song, Y.-L.; Zhang, L. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Antioxidant Properties and Antidiabetic Activity of Hypericum Ascyron L. Med. Chem. Res.; 2011; 20, pp. 809-816. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-010-9391-5]
75. Koo, Y.K.; Kim, J.M.; Koo, J.Y.; Kang, S.S.; Bae, K.; Kim, Y.S.; Chung, J.-H.; Yun-Choi, H.S. Platelet Anti-Aggregatory and Blood Anti-Coagulant Effects of Compounds Isolated from Paeonia Lactiflora and Paeonia Suffruticosa. Die Pharm. Int. J. Pharm. Sci.; 2010; 65, pp. 624-628. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1691/ph.2010.9870]
76. Nur, S.M.; Soemitro, S.; Bahti, H.H.; Tarigan, P.; Shen, Y.M.; Rumampuk, R.J. Chemical Constituents from the Steam Bark of Alangium Kurzi, Craib. Indones. J. Chem.; 2010; 1, pp. 128-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21938]
77. Olaleye, M.T.; Akinmoladun, A.C.; Ogunboye, A.A.; Akindahunsi, A.A. Antioxidant Activity and Hepatoprotective Property of Leaf Extracts of Boerhaavia Diffusa Linn against Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Damage in Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol.; 2010; 48, pp. 2200-2205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.047]
78. Park, J.-H.; Kwon, S.-J. Isolation of Daucosterol and Naphthalene glucoside from Seeds of Cassia mimosoides var. nomame Makino. Korean J. Plant Resour.; 2009; 22, pp. 26-30.
79. León, F.; Habib, E.; Adkins, J.E.; Furr, E.B.; McCurdy, C.R.; Cutler, S.J. Phytochemical Characterization of the Leaves of Mitragyna Speciosa Grown in USA. Nat. Prod. Commun.; 2009; 4, 1934578X0900400705. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0900400705]
80. Jeong, J.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Kang, S.-S.; Jeong, C.-S. Suppressive Actions of Astragali Radix (AR) Ethanol Extract and Isolated Astragaloside I on HCl/Ethanol-Induced Gastric Lesions. Biomol. Ther.; 2009; 17, pp. 62-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2009.17.1.62]
81. Chai, X.-Y.; Ren, H.-Y.; Xu, Z.-R.; Bai, C.-C.; Zhou, F.-R.; Ling, S.-K.; Pu, X.-P.; Li, F.-F.; Tu, P.-F. Investigation of Two Flacourtiaceae Plants: Bennettiodendron Leprosipes and Flacourtia Ramontchi. Planta Med.; 2009; 75, pp. 1246-1252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1185542] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19343626]
82. Mavar-Manga, H.; Haddad, M.; Pieters, L.; Baccelli, C.; Penge, A.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. Anti-Inflammatory Compounds from Leaves and Root Bark of Alchornea Cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Müll. Arg. J. Ethnopharmacol.; 2008; 115, pp. 25-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.08.043] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17942256]
83. Wang, G.-C. Chemical Constituents from Flueggea Virosa: Chemical Constituents from Flueggea Virosa. Chin. J. Nat. Med.; 2008; 6, pp. 251-253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1009.2008.00251]
84. Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, L.; Ding, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J. Isolation of 5-Hydroxypyrrolidin-2-One and Other Constituents from the Young Fronds of Pteridium Aquilinum. J. Nat. Med.; 2008; 62, pp. 358-359. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-008-0225-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18437503]
85. Bang, M.-H.; Lee, D.-Y.; Oh, Y.-J.; Han, M.-W.; Yang, H.-J.; Chung, H.-G.; Jeong, T.-S.; Lee, K.-T.; Choi, M.-S.; Baek, N.-I. Development of Biologically Active Compounds from Edible Plant Sources XXII. Isolation of Indoles from the Roots of Brassica campestris ssp rapa and their hACAT Inhibitory Activity. Appl. Biol. Chem.; 2008; 51, pp. 65-69.
86. Zhang, T.; Chen, Y.-M.; Zhang, G.-L. Novel Neolignan from Penthorum Chinense. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 2007; 49, pp. 1611-1614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1774-7909.2007.00579.x]
87. Rao, G.-X.; Gao, Y.-L.; Lin, Y.-P.; Xiao, Y.-L.; Li, S.-H.; Sun, H.-D. Chemical Constituents of Selinum Cryptotaenium. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.; 2006; 8, pp. 273-275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1028602042000325555]
88. Lin, P.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Shi, J. A Nitrogen-Containing 3-Alkyl-1,4-Benzoquinone and a Gomphilactone Derivative from Embelia Ribes. J. Nat. Prod.; 2006; 69, pp. 1629-1632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np060284m] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17125236]
89. Wang, R.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Liu, R.; Ding, Y.; Du, L. Constituents of the Flowers of Punica granatum. Fitoterapia; 2006; 77, pp. 534-537. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2006.06.011]
90. Pungitore, C.R.; García, M.; Gianello, J.C.; Sosa, M.E.; Tonn, C.E. Insecticidal and Antifeedant Effects of Junellia Aspera (Verbenaceae) Triterpenes and Derivatives on Sitophilus Oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res.; 2005; 41, pp. 433-443. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2004.07.001]
91. Yu, D.-H.; Bao, Y.-M.; Wei, C.-L.; An, L.-J. Studies of chemical constituents and their antioxidant activities from Astragalus mongholicus Bunge. Biomed. Environ. Sci.; 2005; 18, pp. 297-301.
92. Yang, M.-F.; Li, Y.-Y.; Li, B.-G.; Zhang, G.-L. A New Monoterpene Glycoside from Hemiphragma heterophyllum. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 2004; 46, 1454.
93. Wang, R.-F.; Xie, W.-D.; Zhang, Z.; Xing, D.-M.; Ding, Y.; Wang, W.; Ma, C.; Du, L.-J. Bioactive Compounds from the Seeds of Punica Granatum (Pomegranate). J. Nat. Prod.; 2004; 67, pp. 2096-2098. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np0498051]
94. Klimek, B.; Modnicki, D. Terpenoids and sterols from Nepeta cataria L. var. citriodora (Lamiaceae). Acta Pol. Pharm.; 2005; 62, pp. 231-235. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16193817]
95. Bi, Z.-M.; Wang, Z.-T.; Xu, L.-S. Chemical Constituents of Dendrobium Moniliforme. Acta Bot. Sin. Engl. Ed.; 2004; 46, pp. 124-126.
96. Li, P.; Feng, Z.X.; Ye, D.; Huan, W.; Da Gang, W.; Dong, L.X. Chemical Constituents from the Whole Plant of Euphorbia Altotibetic. Helv. Chim. Acta; 2003; 86, pp. 2525-2532. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hlca.200390204]
97. Song, E.-K.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-S.; Cho, H.; Nan, J.-X.; Sohn, D.-H.; Ko, G.-I.; Oh, H.; Kim, Y.-C. Hepatoprotective Phenolic Constituents of Rhodiola Sachalinensis on Tacrine-Induced Cytotoxicity in Hep G2 Cells. Phytother. Res.; 2003; 17, pp. 563-565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1166] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12749001]
98. Xiang, W.; Jiang, B.; Li, X.-M.; Zhang, H.-J.; Zhao, Q.-S.; Li, S.-H.; Sun, H.-D. Constituents of Gnetum Montanum. Fitoterapia; 2002; 73, pp. 40-42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(01)00370-7]
99. Lee, S.; Kim, K.S.; Jang, J.M.; Park, Y.; Kim, Y.B.; Kim, B.-K. Phytochemical Constituents from the Herba of Artemisia Apiacea. Arch. Pharm. Res.; 2002; 25, pp. 285-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02976627]
100. Meng, J.C.; Hu, Y.F.; Chen, J.H.; Tan, R.X. Antifungal Highly Oxygenated Guaianolides and Other Constituents from Ajania Fruticulosa. Phytochemistry; 2001; 58, pp. 1141-1145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00389-2]
101. Jin-rui, C.; Lin-gang, Q.; Min, L.; Si-ping, J.; Yu, K.; Zhong-wu, M.; Guan-fu, H. Studies on the Chemical Constituents of Rhodiola Fastigita S. H. Fu. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 1991; 33, Available online: https://www.jipb.net/EN/Y1991/V33/I1/ (accessed on 12 October 2021).
102. Ling-yi, K.; Zhi-da, M.; Jian-xia, S.; Rui, F. Chemical Constituents from Roots of Jatropha Curcas. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 1996; 38, Available online: https://www.jipb.net/EN/Y1996/V38/I2/ (accessed on 12 October 2021).
103. Tan, R.X.; Wolfender, J.-L.; Ma, W.G.; Zhang, L.X.; Hostettmann, K. Secoiridoids and Antifungal Aromatic Acids from Gentiana Algida. Phytochemistry; 1996; 41, pp. 111-116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00599-4]
104. Tan, R.X.; Kong, L.D. Secoiridoids from Gentiana Siphonantha. Phytochemistry; 1997; 46, pp. 1035-1038. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9396170]
105. Tan, R.X.; Tang, H.Q.; Hu, J.; Shuai, B. Lignans and Sesquiterpene Lactones from Artemisia Sieversiana and Inula Racemosa. Phytochemistry; 1998; 49, pp. 157-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00889-3]
106. Wen-Wu, L.I.; Bo-Gang, L.I.; Li-Sheng, D.; Yao-Zu, C. The Chemical Constituents of Rabdosia Coetsa. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 1998; 40, Available online: https://www.jipb.net/EN/Y1998/V40/I5/ (accessed on 12 October 2021).
107. Fang, X.; Nanayakkara, N.P.D.; Phoebe, C.H.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Farnsworth, N.R. Plant Anticancer Agents XXXVII. Constituents of Amanoa Oblongifolia. Planta Med.; 1985; 51, pp. 346-347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-969511]
108. Kurkin, V.A.; Zapesochnaya, G.G.; Shchavlinskii, A.N. Terpenoids of the Rhizomes OfRhodiola Rosea. Chem. Nat. Compd.; 1985; 21, pp. 593-597. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00579060]
109. Elyakova, L.A.; Dzizenko, A.K.; Sova, V.V.; Elyakov, G.B. The Isolation of Daucosterol FromAcanthopanax Sessiliflorum. Chem. Nat. Compd.; 1966; 2, pp. 26-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00566595]
110. Zhao, C.; She, T.; Wang, L.; Su, Y.; Qu, L.; Gao, Y.; Xu, S.; Cai, S.; Shou, C. Daucosterol Inhibits Cancer Cell Proliferation by Inducing Autophagy through Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Manner. Life Sci.; 2015; 137, pp. 37-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2015.07.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26209138]
111. Hou, J.P.; Wu, H.; Wang, Y.; Weng, X.C. Isolation of Some Compounds from Nutmeg and Their Antioxidant Activities. Czech J. Food Sci.; 2012; 30, pp. 164-170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17221/509/2010-CJFS]
112. Rajavel, T.; Mohankumar, R.; Archunan, G.; Ruckmani, K.; Devi, K.P. Beta Sitosterol and Daucosterol (Phytosterols Identified in Grewia Tiliaefolia) Perturbs Cell Cycle and Induces Apoptotic Cell Death in A549 Cells. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 3418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03511-4]
113. Gao, P.; Huang, X.; Liao, T.; Li, G.; Yu, X.; You, Y.; Huang, Y. Daucosterol Induces Autophagic-Dependent Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer via JNK Activation. BioSci. Trends Adv. Publ.; 2019; 13, pp. 160-167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5582/bst.2018.01293]
114. El Omari, N.; Bakrim, S.; Bakha, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Rebezov, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Bouyahya, A. Natural bioactive compounds targeting epigenetic pathways in cancer: A review on alkaloids, terpenoids, quinones, and isothiocyanates. Nutrients; 2021; 13, 3714. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113714]
115. Bouyahya, A.; Mechchate, H.; Oumeslakht, L.; Zeouk, I.; Aboulaghras, S.; Balahbib, A.; El Omari, N. The role of epigenetic modifications in human cancers and the use of natural compounds as epidrugs: Mechanistic pathways and pharmacodynamic actions. Biomolecules; 2022; 12, 367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom12030367]
116. El Omari, N.; Bakha, M.; Imtara, H.; Guaouguaoua, F.E.; Balahbib, A.; Zengin, G.; Bouyahya, A. Anticancer mechanisms of phytochemical compounds: Focusing on epigenetic targets. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res.; 2021; 28, pp. 47869-47903. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15594-8]
117. Jia, M.; Pang, S.; Liu, X.; Mao, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, H. Effect of Dietary Phytochemicals on the Progression of Breast Cancer Metastasis Based on the in Vivo Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells. J. Funct. Foods; 2020; 65, 103752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.103752]
118. Scholl, S.; Augustin, A.; Loewenstein, A.; Rizzo, S.; Kuppermann, B.D. General pathophysiology of macular edema. Eur. J. Ophthalmol.; 2011; 21, (Suppl. S6), pp. 10-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5301/EJO.2010.6050]
119. Huang, L.-J.; Gao, W.-Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, W.-S.; Huang, L.-Q.; Liu, C.-X. Evaluation of the in Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Extracts from Pyrus Bretschneideri Rehd. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2010; 58, pp. 8983-8987. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf101390q]
120. Kim, M.J.; Wang, H.S.; Lee, M.W. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Fermented Bark of Acanthopanax Sessiliflorus and Its Isolated Compounds on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med.; 2020; 2020, e6749425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6749425]
121. Bui Thanh, T.; Vu Duc, L.; Nguyen Thanh, H.; Nguyen Tien, V. In Vitro Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Isolated Compounds of Ethanol Extract from Sanchezia Speciosa Leonard’s Leaves. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharm.; 2017; 28, pp. 79-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2016-0086]
122. de Carvalho, A.T.; Paes, M.M.; Cunha, M.S.; Brandão, G.C.; Mapeli, A.M.; Rescia, V.C.; Oesterreich, S.A.; Villas-Boas, G.R. Ethnopharmacology of Fruit Plants: A Literature Review on the Toxicological, Phytochemical, Cultural Aspects, and a Mechanistic Approach to the Pharmacological Effects of Four Widely Used Species. Molecules; 2020; 25, 3879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173879]
123. Randhawa, P.K.; Singh, K.; Singh, N.; Jaggi, A.S. A Review on Chemical-Induced Inflammatory Bowel Disease Models in Rodents. Korean J. Physiol. Pharm.; 2014; 18, pp. 279-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2014.18.4.279] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177159]
124. Han, Y.; Lee, J.-H. Berberine Synergy with Amphotericin B against Disseminated Candidiasis in Mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull.; 2005; 28, pp. 541-544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1248/bpb.28.541]
125. Herzyk, D.J.; Gore, E.R.; Polsky, R.; Nadwodny, K.L.; Maier, C.C.; Liu, S.; Hart, T.K.; Harmsen, A.G.; Bugelski, P.J. Immunomodulatory Effects of Anti-CD4 Antibody in Host Resistance against Infections and Tumors in Human CD4 Transgenic Mice. Infect. Immun.; 2001; 69, pp. 1032-1043. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.69.2.1032-1043.2001]
126. Saeidnia, S.; Ara, L.; Hajimehdipoor, H.; Read, R.W.; Arshadi, S.; Nikan, M. Chemical Constituents of Swertia Longifolia Boiss. with α-Amylase Inhibitory Activity. Res. Pharm. Sci.; 2016; 11, pp. 23-32.
127. Ivorra, M.; D’ocon, M.P.; Payá, M.; Villar, Á. Antihyperglycemic and Insulin-Releasing Effects of Beta-Sitosterol 3-Beta-D-Glucoside and Its Aglycone, Beta-Sitosterol. Arch. Int. De Pharmacodyn. Et De Ther.; 1988; 296, pp. 224-231.
128. Benny, M.; Antony, B.; Aravind, A.; Gupta, K.; Joseph, B.; Benny, I. Purification and characterization of anti-hyperglycemic bioactive molecule from costus pictus d. don. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res.; 2020; 11, pp. 2075-2081. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(5).2075-81]
129. Sashidhara, K.V.; Singh, S.P.; Srivastava, A.; Puri, A. Main Extracts and Hypolipidemic Effects of the Bauhinia Racemosa Lam. Leaf Extract in HFD-Fed Hamsters. Nat. Prod. Res.; 2013; 27, pp. 1127-1131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2012.711326] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22840186]
130. Zhu, B.; Qi, F.; Wu, J.; Yin, G.; Hua, J.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, L. Red Yeast Rice: A Systematic Review of the Traditional Uses, Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Quality Control of an Important Chinese Folk Medicine. Front. Pharm.; 2019; 10, 1449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01449]
131. Zhou, W.; Guo, R.; Guo, W.; Hong, J.; Li, L.; Ni, L.; Sun, J.; Liu, B.; Rao, P.; Lv, X. Monascus Yellow, Red and Orange Pigments from Red Yeast Rice Ameliorate Lipid Metabolic Disorders and Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Wistar Rats Fed on a High-Fat Diet. Food Funct.; 2019; 10, pp. 1073-1084. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8FO02192A]
132. Mironova, V.N.; Kalashnikova, L.A. [Hypolipidemic action of beta-D-glycoside beta-sitosterol in the rat]. Farm. Toksikol.; 1982; 45, pp. 45-47.
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.