It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Motivated by the well-established benefits to society of artistic creation and of demographic diversity, we investigate the gender and racial/ethnic composition of influential contributors to four creative domains. Women make up 51% of the U.S. population but are underrepresented at influential levels of contemporary art (28%), high fashion (45%), box office film (27%), and popular music (17%). Marginalized racial/ethnic groups make up 39% of the U.S. population yet comprise approximately half that figure in contemporary art (22%), high fashion (22%), and box office film (19%). Black musical artists have higher representation (48%), though higher representation does not equate with equity and inclusion. As for intersecting identities, white men are overrepresented in all four domains by factors ranging from 1.4 to 2 as compared to the U.S. population, and most other gender-racial/ethnic groups are further minoritized. Our study is the first comprehensive, comparative, empirical look at intersecting identities across creative fields. The exclusion of marginalized individuals, including those who are women, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Latinx, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, is severe. The lack of self-expressed demographic data is a challenge, as is the erasure of certain identity groups from the American Community Survey, including agender, gender noncomforming, nonbinary, and transgender individuals. These are challenges that, if addressed, would enhance our collective understanding of diversity in creative fields.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Institute for the Quantitative Study of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, Williamstown, USA; Williams College, Williamstown, USA (GRID:grid.268275.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2284 9898)
2 Institute for the Quantitative Study of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, Williamstown, USA (GRID:grid.268275.c); Bennington College, Bennington, USA (GRID:grid.423234.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0670 2431)
3 Harvard University, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
4 Institute for the Quantitative Study of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, Williamstown, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c); Northwestern University, Evanston, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507)
5 Institute for the Quantitative Study of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, Williamstown, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36)
6 Institute for the Quantitative Study of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, Williamstown, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36); Brown University, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094)
7 Institute for the Quantitative Study of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity, Williamstown, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33); University of Colorado, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564)