It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The widely used stainless steels and their deformed variants are anticorrosive in ambient conditions due to passivation layers composed of chromium oxides. Conventionally, corrosion and erosion of the steels are attributed to the breakdown of such layers but seldomly to the origin that depends on surface heterogeneity at the microscopic level. In this work, the nanometer-scaled chemical heterogeneity at the surface unveiled via spectro-microscopy and chemometric analysis unexpectedly dominates the breakdown and corrosion behavior of the cold-rolled Ce-modified 2507 super-duplex stainless steels (SDSS) over its hot-deformed counterpart. Though relatively uniformly covered by a native Cr2O3 layer revealed by X-ray photoemission electron microscopy, the cold-rolled SDSS behaved poorly in passivity because of locally distributed Fe3+ rich nano-islands over the Fe/Cr oxide layer. This atomic-level knowledge provides a deep understanding of corrosion of stainless steel and is expected to benefit corrosion controls of similar high-alloyed metals.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of Oulu, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, Oulu, Finland (GRID:grid.10858.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 4873)
2 Henan University of Science and Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Luoyang, China (GRID:grid.453074.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9797 0900); Henan University of Science and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Nonferrous Metals, Luoyang, China (GRID:grid.453074.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9797 0900)
3 Henan University of Science and Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Luoyang, China (GRID:grid.453074.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9797 0900)
4 Lund University, MAX IV Laboratory, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
5 Canadian Light Source, 44 Innovation Blvd, Saskatoon, Canada (GRID:grid.423571.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0443 7584)
6 Utrecht University, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1) (ISNI:0000000120346234)
7 University of Oulu, Materials and Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Advanced Steels Research, Oulu, Finland (GRID:grid.10858.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 4873)
8 University of Oulu, Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, Oulu, Finland (GRID:grid.10858.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 4873); Henan University of Science and Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Luoyang, China (GRID:grid.453074.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9797 0900)