It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The paper focuses on researching the effect of fatigue loading on metallic structure, lifetime, and fracture surface topographies in AISI H13 steel specimens obtained by selective laser melting (SLM). The topography of the fracture surfaces was measured over their entire area, according to the entire total area method, with an optical three-dimensional surface measurement system. The fatigue results of the SLM 3D printed steel specimens were compared with those reported for conventionally manufactured 13H steel. The investigation also considers the roughness of the specimens’ side surface. Moreover, the fractographic evaluation conducted using scanning electron microscopy confirms that the predominant fracture mechanism is transgranular fracture. Microtomography done after mechanical loading also showed the influence of the stress level on the porosity distribution. Both fractographic and Micro-CT investigations confirm that higher stresses result in coarser and much more uniform porosity observed in fractured samples. These comprehensive quantitative and qualitative fracture analyses are beneficial to predict the failure conditions of SLM steel parts, especially in the case of fatigue damage. From the quantitative analysis of the H13 SLM-manufactured fracture surface topography, it was possible to conclude that the larger the loadings acting on the specimen, the rougher the fracture surface because the ductile fracture mode dominates. It has also been proven that the porosity degree changes along the length of the sample for the most stressed specimens.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk, Poland (GRID:grid.6868.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2187 838X); Gdańsk University of Technology, Advanced Materials Center, Gdańsk, Poland (GRID:grid.6868.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2187 838X)
2 Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Nova School of Science and Technology, Caparica, Portugal (GRID:grid.10772.33) (ISNI:0000000121511713)
3 University of Coimbra, CEMMPRE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Coimbra, Portugal (GRID:grid.8051.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9511 4342)
4 Opole University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole, Poland (GRID:grid.440608.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9187 132X)
5 Lublin University of Technology, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin, Poland (GRID:grid.41056.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 8769 4682)
6 AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Kraków, Poland (GRID:grid.9922.0) (ISNI:0000 0000 9174 1488)