It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Standard proxies for reconstructing surface mass balance (SMB) in Antarctic ice cores are often inaccurate or coarsely resolved when applied to more complicated environments away from dome summits. Here, we propose an alternative SMB proxy based on photolytic fractionation of nitrogen isotopes in nitrate observed at 114 sites throughout East Antarctica. Applying this proxy approach to nitrate in a shallow core drilled at a moderate SMB site (Aurora Basin North), we reconstruct 700 years of SMB changes that agree well with changes estimated from ice core density and upstream surface topography. For the under-sampled transition zones between dome summits and the coast, we show that this proxy can provide past and present SMB values that reflect the immediate local environment and are derived independently from existing techniques.
Snow accumulation rates in Antarctica can now be reconstructed from nitrate isotopes in snow and ice. This independent technique offers scientists a new tool for studying how Antarctic climate changed in the past and how it may change in the future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.5676.2) (ISNI:0000000417654326); Trinity College Dublin, Department of Geography, Dublin, Ireland (GRID:grid.8217.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9705)
2 Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.5676.2) (ISNI:0000000417654326)
3 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Japan (GRID:grid.410588.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 0132)
4 Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE-IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)
5 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole, USA (GRID:grid.56466.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0504 7510); Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
6 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)
7 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105); Nanjing University, International Center for Isotope Effects Research, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.41156.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 964X); Nanjing University, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.41156.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2314 964X)
8 Energy, the Environment and Water, Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Kingston, Australia (GRID:grid.1047.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0416 0263); Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X)