It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Modern fertility techniques allow parents to carry out preimplantation sex selection. Sex selection for non-medical purposes is legal in many high-income countries, and social norms toward assisted reproductive technology are increasingly permissive and may plausibly become increasingly prevalent in the near future. We explore possible outcomes of widely observed daughter preferences in many high-income countries and explore the demographic consequences of the adoption of sex selection for daughters. While concerns over son preference have been widely discussed, sex selection that favors female children is a more likely outcome in high-income countries. If sex selection is adopted, it may bias the sex ratio in a given population. Male-biased populations are likely to experience slower population growth, which limits the long-term viability of corresponding cultural norms. Conversely, female-biased populations are likely to experience faster population growth. Cultural norms that promote female-biased sex ratios are as a consequence therefore also self-reinforcing. In this study, we explore the demographic consequences of a female-biased sex ratio for population growth and population age structure. We also discuss the technology and parental preferences that may give rise to such a scenario.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Jebari, Karim 2
1 Stockholm University, Demography Unit, Department of Sociology, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377); Stockholm University, Center for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377); Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.469952.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0468 0031); Åbo Akademi, Vasa, Finland (GRID:grid.13797.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2235 8415)
2 Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.469952.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0468 0031)





