It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Deep-habitat cetaceans are generally difficult to study, leading to a limited knowledge of their population. This paper assesses the differential distribution patterns of three deep-habitat cetaceans (Sperm whale—Physeter macrocephalus, Risso’s dolphin—Grampus griseus & Cuvier’s beaked whale—Ziphius cavirostris). We used data of 842 opportunistic sightings of cetaceans in the western Mediterranean sea. We inferred environmental and spatio-temporal factors that affect their distribution. Binary logistic regression models were generated to compare the presence of deep-habitat cetaceans with the presence of other cetacean species in the dataset. Then, the favourability function was applied, allowing for comparison between all the models. Sperm whale and Risso’s dolphin presence was differentially favoured by the distance to towns in the eastern part of the western Mediterranean sea. The differential distribution of sperm whale was also influenced by the stability of SST, and that of the Risso’s dolphin by lower mean salinity and higher mean Chlorophyll A concentration. When modelling the three deep-habitat cetaceans (including Cuvier’s beaked whale), the variable distance to towns had a negative influence on the presence of any of them more than it did to other cetaceans, being more favourable far from towns, so this issue should be further investigated.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidad de Málaga, Departamento de Biología Animal, Biogeography, Diversity, and Conservation Research Team, Facultad de Ciencias, Malaga, Spain (GRID:grid.10215.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 7828)
2 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Málaga, Fuengirola, Spain (GRID:grid.410389.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 6642); Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Instituto Iberoamericano de Desarrollo Sostenible (IIDS), Región de la Araucanía, Chile (GRID:grid.441837.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0765 9762)
3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Málaga, Fuengirola, Spain (GRID:grid.410389.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 6642)
4 Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle, Germany (GRID:grid.7492.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 3830)
5 Academia Malagueña de Ciencias, Malaga, Spain (GRID:grid.7492.8); Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.500946.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8915 2289)