Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19

Abstract

Standard contact tracing practice for COVID-19 is to identify persons exposed to an infected person during the contagious period, assumed to start two days before symptom onset or diagnosis. In the first large cohort study on backward contact tracing for COVID-19, we extended the contact tracing window by 5 days, aiming to identify the source of the infection and persons infected by the same source. The risk of infection amongst these additional contacts was similar to contacts exposed during the standard tracing window and significantly higher than symptomatic individuals in a control group, leading to 42% more cases identified as direct contacts of an index case. Compared to standard practice, backward traced contacts required fewer tests and shorter quarantine. However, they were identified later in their infectious cycle if infected. Our results support implementing backward contact tracing when rigorous suppression of viral transmission is warranted.

Backward contact tracing aims to identify individuals who were infected by the same person as infected an index case, and has been shown to be effective in modelling studies of SARS-COV-2. Here, the authors present empirical data of the effectiveness of backward contact tracing from a program amongst university students in Belgium.