It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective strategy to prevent uninfected individuals from contracting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), however it must be acceptable to stakeholders in order to be effective. This study aimed to assess the acceptability of PrEP and related influencing factors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among female sex workers (FSW), people who inject drugs (PWID), and men who have sex with men (MSM) using respondent driven sampling. Factors influencing PrEP acceptability were estimated using ordinal logistic regression and Bayesian networks. The survey included 765 eligible participants. The mean score of the perceived acceptability index was 3.9 (SD = 1.97). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a higher acceptance of PrEP was associated with elder age, having other medical insurance, higher perceived utility of PrEP in facilitating prevention of HIV, higher perceived ease of use, higher perceived risk of increased risk behavior, higher perceived privacy problem in using PrEP, higher perceived comparative advantage over condom use, higher perceived comparative advantage of having sex when the urge arises, and higher perceived image of PrEP user as having sexual risky behavior, as public-minded and as health-conscious. The Bayesian network model showed perceived ease of use, perceived image of user as health-conscious, and perceived comparative advantage of having sex when the urge arises were directly associated with acceptability of PrEP. If these three factors were at a high level, 74.6% of the participants would have a high level of acceptability of PrEP. Effective education strategies to promote the acceptance of PrEP are needed. Implementation strategies should incorporate more inclusive messaging and build positive publicity for PrEP to reduce the stigma that PrEP use indicates risky behavior.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Guilin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of AIDS Control and Prevention, Guilin, China; Prince of Songkla University, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hat Yai, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
2 Guilin Medical University, Health Management Unit, Faculty of Humanities and Management, Guilin, China (GRID:grid.443385.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1798 9548)
3 Prince of Songkla University, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hat Yai, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
4 Prince of Songkla University, Division of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Hat Yai, Thailand (GRID:grid.7130.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 1162)
5 Guilin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of AIDS Control and Prevention, Guilin, China (GRID:grid.7130.5)