It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with disease progression on ibrutinib have worse outcomes compared to patients stopping ibrutinib due to toxicity. A better understanding of expected outcomes in these patients is necessary to establish a benchmark for evaluating novel agents currently available and in development. We evaluated outcomes of 144 patients with CLL treated at Mayo Clinic with 2018 iwCLL disease progression on ibrutinib. The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 25.5 months; it was 29.8 months and 8.3 months among patients with CLL progression (n = 104) and Richter transformation (n = 38), respectively. Longer OS was observed among patients with CLL progression who had received ibrutinib in the frontline compared to relapsed/refractory setting (not reached versus 28.5 months; p = 0.04), but was similar amongst patients treated with 1, 2, or ≥3 prior lines (18.5, 30.9, and 26.0 months, respectively, p = 0.24). Among patients with CLL disease progression on ibrutinib, OS was significantly longer when next-line treatment was chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (median not reached) or venetoclax-based treatment (median 29.8 months) compared to other approved treatments, such as chemoimmunotherapy, phosphoinositide 3’-kinase inhibitors, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (9.1 months; p = 0.03). These findings suggest an unmet need for this growing patient population.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
2 Mayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
3 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Phoenix, USA (GRID:grid.470142.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0443 9766)
4 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.417467.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0443 9942)
5 Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
6 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X); Mayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
7 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X); Mayo Clinic, Department of Immunology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)