1. Introduction
Plants are widely exposed to various environmental stresses responsible for the deterioration or alterations in their morphological, physiological, biochemical, anatomical, and molecular characteristics. It has been reported that about 50% of crop loss occurs due to environmental stresses. As a defense strategy, plants develop mechanisms to mitigate the harmful effects of stress, such as the initiation of signaling of different phytohormones [1]. Among the phytohormones, ethylene acts as a stress hormone. However, besides ethylene, ABA is also considered a stress hormone [2]. We may find that under different stresses, these phytohormones might be involved in stress responses and stress adaptations. Ethylene release is triggered by various environmental stresses, such as metal stress, flood stress, and drought stress [3]. It is a simple gaseous hormone that regulates plant growth and development responses under optimal and stressful environments [4,5,6]. It can easily diffuse to nearby cells, and its production occurs locally at the site of its action. Moreover, it has roles in seed germination, nutrient acquisition, senescence, ripening, physiological and molecular mechanisms under optimal conditions, and stress acclimation [1,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Several studies have shown that ethylene biosynthesis is significantly induced during fruit ripening, leaf senescence, or under environmental stresses [3,6]. The enzymes 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthases (ACSs) and ACC oxidases (ACOs) are considered to be the key biosynthetic enzymes that are responsible for ethylene biosynthesis [3]. Ethylene initiates a cascade of adaptive responses in plants under optimal and stressful states. However, the literature does not provide collective information on the induction mechanism of stress ethylene by the influence of environmental stresses or the sources of ethylene production and its exogenous application for stress acclimatization.
Ethylene regulates various mechanisms and interacts with nutrients and/or phytohormones. It has roles in the control of photosynthesis, sulfur (S) and nitrogen (N) and proline metabolism, glycine betaine (GB) production, and the antioxidant defense system to protect plants from environmental stress conditions [10,14,15,16]. Ethylene is involved in synthesizing secondary metabolites [17] responsible for stress tolerance under stressful conditions. Ethylene regulates the glutathione (GSH) synthesis in Arabidopsis under ozone stress [18] and in Brassica juncea under salt stress [10]. Indeed, ethylene regulates plants’ metabolism for stress tolerance. Thus, ethylene has been connected to the stress response, and data on environmental stresses’ influences on ethylene biosynthesis and signaling are available. However, the picture still needs clarification on many points. We have tried to fill this gap by describing the current knowledge of the mechanism and regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and updating it with the ethylene signaling pathways in plants and their responses to several environmental stresses. The addition of new knowledge of the ethylene response and the clarification of the mechanisms of action will show how plants detect and react to this phytohormone, as well as how the signal is combined with other responses under different environmental stresses, eventually deciding the phenotype of the plant.
2. Biochemistry and Molecular Studies on Ethylene Biosynthesis
It has been reported that all major classes of photosynthetic organisms, such as cyanobacteria, algae, lichen, early diverging land plants, gymnosperms, and angiosperms, produce ethylene. However, the genetic basis of ethylene biosynthesis varies between taxa [19]. A previous study reported that marine algae, mainly green algae, synthesized acrylic acid in considerable amounts, and the decarboxylation of acrylic acid resulted in ethylene evolution. It has also been reported that the ethylene biosynthesis pathway in green algae is very close to the path described in higher plants [20]. The precursors are the same (L-methionine, S-adenosyl-methionine, SAM, and ACC), but the enzymatic complex transforming ACC to ethylene (ACO) is different, being stimulated by cobalt (Co2+). Many reports have shown that the biosynthetic pathway of ethylene in higher plants is well established [5,6,9,21,22]. Under optimal conditions, ethylene biosynthesis occurs through a relatively simple metabolic pathway extensively studied in plants [4]. In general, plants, including algae, produce ethylene from the amino acid methionine in two steps [23]. The production begins with the formation of the intermediate SAM from methionine, mediated by SAM synthetase in an ATP-dependent step [22,23]. In the first step, the substrate SAM is converted to ACC and 5′-methylthioadenosine (MTA) by the enzyme ACS [24,25]. SAM is formed when an adenosyl group is transferred from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to methionine. Methionine is a sulfur-containing amino acid, and the adenosine binds to the sulfur of the methionine to form SAM with the help of the enzyme SAM synthetase. ACC is produced from SAM by ACS in the next step, and methionine is reproduced within the Yang cycle [26,27] (Figure 1). Besides ACC, ACS also produces 5′-methylthioadenosine in this reaction, which is transformed to methionine through a changed methionine cycle [28], and reserves the methyl group for another round of ethylene synthesis. After that, methionine is converted to decarboxylated SAM, which is catalyzed by the enzyme SAM decarboxylase [29]. The immediate ethylene precursor, ACC, can move basipetal in the phloem or acropetally through the xylem in plants. A recent study demonstrated that the direct ethylene precursor ACC is transported through the xylem via the LYSINE HISTIDINE TRANSPORTER (LHT1) or conjugated into malonyl-ACC or jasmonyl-ACC, which are also transported through the xylem [30]. The last step of ethylene biosynthesis from ACC is catalyzed by ACO and needs O2 and carbon dioxide (CO2) as a co-substrate and essential activators, respectively [31]. The ACO oxidizes ACC to ethylene and cyanoformic acid, which decarboxylates naturally to cyanide and CO2. This poisonous cyanide is detoxified by β-cyanoalanine synthase [32], and ethylene can be degraded by oxidation to ethylene oxide (ethylene monooxygenase) and then to ethylene-glycol [33]. Thus, it can be summarized that the pathway of ethylene synthesis starts from Met to SAM via SAM synthetase, then to ACC via ACS, and ACC to ethylene via ACO. Thus, the two major enzymes for ethylene manipulation are ACS and ACO, and ACC is the immediate ethylene precursor. In higher plants, ACS and ACO enzymes are encoded by multigene families, but these genes are unavailable in the genomes of early diverging plant lineages [34]. Interestingly, several plant lineages deviate from the ACC-dependent pathway for ethylene production. For example, ethylene is synthesized via a distinct metabolism process in aquatic angiosperms belonging to the family “Araceae” [35]. Seed plants of the Ginkgoales and Cycadales use an ACC-independent synthesis route because of the lack of ACO activity [36]. The ethylene biosynthesis trait is present in many fungi and bacteria [37]. The presence of the ACC pathway has been rarely observed outside of plants [38], except in slime molds [39], several lichen mycobionts [40], and the Penicillium genus of fungi [38]. Ethylene is produced in all higher plants and is usually associated with a triple response. The triple response of dark-grown pea seedlings to ethylene includes increased stem thickening, reduced stem elongation, and a horizontal growth habit [41,42]. In etiolated pea seedlings, Shaharoona et al. [43] showed that rhizobacterial ACC deaminase, produced in response to various biotic and abiotic stresses, extenuates the ACC-induced classic triple response. Although the ethylene biosynthesis mechanisms under environmental stress are the same as those under optimal conditions, the effect on ACC of different stresses determines the level of ethylene synthesis.
When plants are exposed to environmental stress conditions, an accumulation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) occurs. This leads to the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade in their response and the activation of the ACS and ACO enzymes. The Arabidopsis genome encodes nine ACS genes, among which ACS2, ACS4-9, and ACS11 encode functional ACS, while ACS1 encodes catalytically inactive enzymes or nonfunctional homodimers [44]. The presence of eight functionally active ACS enzymes in Arabidopsis and their ability to form active heterodimers might increase the versatility of ethylene responses, enhancing the capacity to regulate ethylene production after different developmental and environmental stages [45,46]. Non-functional heterodimerization plays a regulatory role in the plant life cycle [46]. The regulation of ethylene biosynthesis has been reported for both positive and negative feedback in several plants [23,28,47]. A study on tomatoes showed that LE-ACS2 and LE-ACS4 were positively regulated, and LE-ACS6 was negatively regulated by ethylene synthesized during fruit ripening [48]. Indeed, the expression of several ACS genes is upregulated by various environmental stresses that induce ethylene synthesis [49]. Joo et al. [50] found that ACS2 and ACS6 (isoforms of ACS in Arabidopsis) act as substrates for the MAPK cascade, and the phosphorylation of ACS2/ACS6 by MPK6 leads to ACS protein accumulation, which results in ethylene induction. In contrast, unphosphorylated ACS6 protein is degraded by the 26S proteasome pathway, which decreases ethylene production. This suggests the post-translational modification for ethylene formation under stress. The mutants eto1, eto2, and eto3 have a constitutive ethylene response phenotype due to ethylene overproduction. These dominant mutations cause increased stability in their corresponding ACS proteins [51], suggesting that ACS enzymes are the target of protein degradation [52,53]. It was also reported that the phosphorylation of MAPK sites in type 1 ACSs increased protein stability and, as a result, increased ethylene production [50,51]. Indeed, several studies suggested that an essential component of ACS and ethylene biosynthesis regulation occurs post-transcriptionally by stabilizing ACS proteins [54,55,56]. Interestingly, the stability of type 2 and type 3 ACS proteins is dependent upon RING-type E3 ligases’ activity [56]. The study by Wang et al. [55] reported that Arabidopsis root produces ethylene due to the loss of function of ETHYLENE OVERPRODUCER 1 (ETO1). They reported that the ETO1 mutation (eto1) is in a gene that negatively influences ACS activity and ethylene production. The ETO1 protein interacts directly with and inhibits the enzyme activity of full-length ACS5 and results in ACS5 protein and ethylene accumulation. ETO1 overexpression inhibits the induction of ethylene production by cytokinin (plant growth regulator) and promotes ACS5 degradation by a proteasome-dependent pathway [55]. The ETO1 gene encodes a ubiquitin E3 ligase that controls ethylene biosynthesis by modulating the levels of ACS5 [57], and ETO1 serves as a substrate-specific adapter protein [55]. Here, ETO1 performs a dual mechanism, inhibiting the activity of the ACS enzyme and targeting protein degradation, and permitting the rapid modulation of the enzyme concentration. Moreover, Arabidopsis also contains two ETO1 paralogs, ETO1-LIKE1 (EOL1) and ETO1-LIKE2 (EOL2). Likewise, ETO1, EOL1, and EOL2 contribute to the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the type 2 ACS proteins or interact with ACS5 to decrease its activity [55,56]. Reports by Chae et al. [58] and Hansen et al. [54] suggested that the eto2 and eto3 mutations only partially disrupt the binding of ACS5 and ACS9 to ETO1/EOL1, and that hormones, cytokinin, and brassinosteroid further prevent this interaction. ETO1 and EOL1 do not interact with the Arabidopsis type 3 ACS (ACS7) [59]. Another XBAT32 is a RING-type monomeric E3 ligase that regulates ethylene homeostasis. XBAT32 was recently discovered to be necessary for the degradation of ACS4 and ACS7. It has been reported that 1 mutants overproduce ethylene and exhibit various ethylene-related symptoms, including a mild triple response in dark-grown seedlings, reduced plant height, and a reduction in the number of lateral roots [56]. Similar to ETO1, EOL1, and EOL2, XBAT32 is involved in the ubiquitin-dependent turnover of ACS4, but E3 does not interact with ACS11, so XBAT32’s role in regulating the abundance of type 2 ACS protein may be limited [60]. Thus, the ACS enzyme is regulated by distinct transcriptional and post-transcriptional inputs and allows full control of ethylene biosynthesis in plants under various developmental and environmental states.
However, it is equally relevant to determine the importance of ACO in ethylene synthesis. ACO activity is increased under salinity stress, which leads to increased ethylene in Cicer arietinum root [61]. The transcripts of ACO1 in wheat were found to decrease under salinity and other abiotic stresses, resulting in lower ethylene formation [62]. The constitutive expression of wheat ACO1 in Arabidopsis led to increased expression of AtMYB15 and suppression of the AtRAB18, AtCBF1, and AtCBF3 genes, which are stress-responsive and, therefore, salt-sensitive [63].
We might be baffled by ethylene’s different responses under different stresses. However, it is equally relevant to know the cause of the ethylene response. To summarize the knowledge, we may say that ethylene under different stresses may be a positive or negative regulator of stress tolerance. Still, its presence under stress is unequivocal—it activates differential responses in plants. Where it is involved in tolerance, it triggers the induction of antioxidative enzymes and stress-related gene expression, and may work in coordination with different hormones for alleviating stress. In case of sensitivity to stress, excess ethylene up-regulates ROS production and senescence, and growth reduction. However, even in these cases, the reduction effect on plant growth could be a survival strategy for adaptation. An increase in ROS has now been proved to act as a signal under different stresses to alarm the plant of the stress it will encounter and prepare the defensive machinery accordingly. Regardless of whether the stress is low or high, ethylene production occurs in both cases. Even under non-stress conditions, ethylene formation occurs through the formation of ACC from ACS, and then its conversion to ethylene via ACO.
Ethylene biosynthesis and its action are inhibited to improve the shelf life of products. The commonly used ethylene biosynthesis inhibitors are 2-aminoethoxyvinyl glycine (AVG) and aminooxyacetic acid (AOA), and ethylene action inhibitors include 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), norbornadiene (NBD), silver thiosulfate (STS), silver nitrate (AgNO3), etc. AVG is an inhibitor of ACS, while 1-MCP and silvers are inhibitors of ethylene receptors (Figure 2). Ethylene inhibitors block ethylene biosynthesis or ethylene action; therefore, fruits, plants, and flowers do not respond to endogenously produced ethylene or ethylene from exogenous sources.
3. Ethylene Signaling
Ethylene signaling is well known to regulate plant growth and development. This signaling was predominantly delineated with research on Arabidopsis thaliana, and the information from Arabidopsis about ethylene signaling is usually applied to other plant species [64]. In Arabidopsis, ethylene is perceived by the family of receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 (ETR1), ETR2, ETHYLENE RESPONSE SENSOR1 (ERS1), ERS2, and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE4 (EIN4), which act negatively in ethylene signaling, are related to two-component histidine kinase receptors [65,66], and are located at the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes [16,67]. Ethylene is a gaseous hormone that may diffuse in both aqueous and lipid environments [10], so its perception does not require a plasma membrane-localized receptor. Several studies have suggested that ethylene receptors are located on the ER membrane [68,69]. Therefore, once ethylene is biosynthesized, it freely diffuses throughout the plants through plasma membranes, reaching the ER, and binds to the ethylene receptors anchored in the ER membrane to stimulate ethylene responses. In ethylene’s absence, ethylene receptors activate the CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1 (CTR1), a Raf-like Ser/Thr protein kinase [70,71]. Interestingly, CTR1 phosphorylates the C-terminal end of EIN2 (EIN2-CEND) and turns off EIN2, an ER-localized membrane protein. The mRNAs for F-box proteins, EBF1 and EBF2, are translated in the cytosol and target the master transcriptional regulators of ethylene signaling, EIN3 and EIN3-LIKE1 (EIL1), to proteasomes for protein turnover in the nucleus. Thus, no ethylene-stimulated transcriptional responses are activated. In the presence of ethylene, ethylene binding to their receptors shuts off, and CTR1 becomes inactivated, EIN2 is dephosphorylated and cleaved, and it releases C-terminus (EIN2-CEND), which enters the cytosol (moves to P-bodies) and nucleus. In the cytosol, EIN2-CEND represses the translation of EIN3 BINDING F-BOX PROTEIN1 (EBF1) and EBF2 transcripts by directly or indirectly binding to their 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTRs) and moving along with these transcripts to the P-bodies [72,73]. In the nucleus, EIN2-CEND directly or indirectly promotes the activity of EIN3 and EIL1. Ethylene stabilizes the EIN3/EIL1 transcription factors and regulates the transcription of ethylene-responsive target genes, such as ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (ERF) [22,74,75]. It was reported that a gene from the ERF family (isolated from tomato), LeERF1, positively modulates the ethylene triple response on etiolated seedlings, plant development, fruit ripening, and softening, as it was shown that LeERF1 is used transgenically in tomato of sense LeERF1 (LeERF1-sn), wild type, and transgenic tomato of anti-sense LeERF1 (LeERF1-as) tomato [76].
The EIN2-CEND also contributes to the downstream signaling of ethylene via the elevation of the acetylation of histone H3K14 and the non-canonical acetylation of H3K23, as reported by Zhang et al. [77]. EIN2-CEND regulates H3K14Ac and H3K23Ac in response to ethylene and uncovers the unique mechanism by which EIN2 nuclear-associated protein 1 (ENAP1) interacts with histone in the absence of ethylene, preserving the open chromatin status and enabling a rapid response to ethylene stimulation; however, in the presence of ethylene, EIN2 interacts with ENAP1, elevating the levels of H3K14Ac/H3K23Ac, promoting more EIN3 proteins to bind to the target shared with ENAP1 and resulting in rapid transcriptional regulation [78]. Another ethylene receptor, ETR1, is an example of a hybrid histidine kinase, because it contains a histidine kinase domain and a receiver domain; in contrast, ERS1 contains only a histidine kinase domain [73]. CTR1 interacts with both the histidine kinase and receiver domains of ETR1 and the histidine kinase domain of ERS1 [79]. Testerink et al. [80] observed that phosphatidic acid blocked the interaction of CTR1 with ETR1, which is an ethylene receptor, by inhibiting CTR1 kinase activity. The mechanism of the ethylene signaling pathway in plants is shown in detail in Figure 3.
4. Influence of Environmental Stress on Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling
4.1. Induction Mechanism of Stress Ethylene by the Influence of Environmental Stress
Stress ethylene refers to the accelerated biosynthesis of this hormone induced by environmental stresses. Ethylene stress is crucial to plant adaptation and survival under environmental stresses; however, ultimately, it leads to plant death. The underlying mechanism of how these stresses influence ethylene biosynthesis has been reported in various studies, but we are systematically updating the current information on the influence of major environmental stresses, such as heat stress, heavy metal stress, salinity stress, drought stress, and flood stress, on the induction mechanism of stress ethylene and its responses in plants under one roof.
Heat stress may induce or reduce ethylene formation, depending on the activation or suppression of ACS activity. A study reported that exposure to heat stress accelerated the production and accumulation of ethylene in kiwifruit [81], while it decreased those in some plants, such as tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) [82]. Heat stress causes excessive accumulation of ROS, causing oxidative stress. The increase in ROS to a certain level triggers a signal for ethylene synthesis. Oxidative stress, especially due to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), acts together with ethylene in a self-amplifying feedback loop where ethylene-induced H2O2 accumulation enhances ethylene production and H2O2 initiates leaf senescence and chlorosis under heat stress [83]. Ethylene synthesis in heat stress has been associated with decreased pollen germination and development [84]. Contrarily, an ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor, AVG, leads to the reduction of chlorophyll and induces electrolyte leakage under heat stress in Lolium perenne [85]. Moreover, heat stress differentially modifies ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in pea floral and fruit tissues. Under heat stress, the up-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis gene expression in pre-pollinated ovaries is associated with higher ethylene evolution and lower retention of these fruits [86]. Several reports showed that ACS regulation is focused on ACS gene expression in response to various environmental stimuli, and its enzymes are spatially and temporally regulated and controlled by several external and internal signals. At high temperatures (about 35 °C), there is no change in the ethylene concentration in creeping bentgrass [87]. Therefore, this suggests that heat tolerance and the heat stress responses for stress ethylene production vary between different plant species, and ethylene exhibits time and dose-dependent effects on the plants during heat stress [88].
A heavy metal-induced increase in ethylene production has been reported in several plant species, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Triticum aestivum, Pisum sativum, Glycine max, Brassica juncea, etc. [19,89]. Ethylene acts as a negative regular in plant responses under heavy metal stress because the plant shows a rapid increase in ethylene production with a subsequent reduction in growth [8]. A study demonstrated that Cd exposure significantly increased ethylene emission and its biosynthetic gene NnACS expression. Similarly, heavy metals, such as chromium (Cr) and Cd, increased ethylene production in Brassica juncea, Triticum aestivum, and Brassica juncea [5,8,90]. This was because the oxidative stress produced during Cd stress caused the activation of the MPK3 and MPK6 cascade, which regulated ACS2/ACS6 transcription, thereby contributing to stress-induced ethylene production [54,91]. It has also been noted that both ACS and ACO genes were regulated independently by specific stresses [28]. Moreover, the upregulation of ACO genes led to ethylene production under copper (Cu) stress and induced the expression of ACO1 and ACO3 genes in Nicotiana glutinosa [92].
Salinity increases ethylene biosynthesis in several lettuce cultivars during the germination phase and in pepper, broccoli, and beetroot. At the same time, a decrease occurs in melon, spinach, and tomato [93,94]. Indeed, studies suggested that salt stress enhances ethylene biosynthesis, but this was stress ethylene that had to be brought down to an optimum level favoring plant photosynthesis and growth. It has been reported that ACC negatively affected tomato seedlings’ growth under salinity stress [93]. Interestingly, it has also been reported that the response of ethylene biosynthesis to salt stress is related to plant sensitivity; for example, pepper shoot is the most sensitive to saline treatment, showing the highest fresh weight inhibition and the highest increase in the total ACC concentration [95]. In contrast, beetroot is less affected by salinity and shows no effect on the total ACC concentration in response to saline treatment [93]. Thus, the greater the resistance of the plant to salinity, the lesser the response to this stressor, including at the level of the production of stress ethylene. Saline treatment increases the total ACC concentration in both the roots and shoots in most of the plant species examined, such as Capsicum annum, Lycopersicon esculentum, Brassica oleraceae, Lactuca sativa, Cucumis melo, Phaseolus vulgaris, Spinacia oleracea, and Beta vulgaris, which is related to plant sensitivity to salinity [94,95].
Drought is an important abiotic stress factor that limits plant growth and development. Under drought stress conditions, an increased level of ethylene or stress ethylene has been reported in rice plant species [96,97]. During the biosynthesis of ethylene induced by water stress, the de novo synthesis of the enzyme ACS is induced and is responsible for the accumulation of ACC and increase in stress ethylene production [98]. Under drought conditions, ACC acts as a transduction molecule for OsERF109, which negatively regulates drought tolerance and reduces ethylene formation, acting as a switch during drought tolerance to avoid excessive ethylene production [97]. It has been reported that potassium (K+) starvation inhibits the water stress-induced stomatal closure by favoring the synthesis of ethylene, which interacts negatively with ABA in stomatal closure in sunflower plants [99]. The study by Tanaka et al. [100] suggested that wild-type plants treated with ABA show faster stomata closure than ethylene-supplemented Arabidopsis plants.
In the context of climate change, flooding has been identified as significant environmental stress for plant growth and crop production worldwide. It has been noted that, during flooding, the limitation of gas diffusion results in O2 shortage and accumulation of ethylene in flooded tissues, and results in the formation of ROS [101]. During flooding, the root releases a high amount of ACC, resulting in stress ethylene production in tomato plants [102]. Interestingly, ACC formed in roots is transported to the shoots during flooding, where it is converted to ACC and ethylene, increasing their production in tomato plants [103]. A recent study by Yamauchi et al. [104] suggested that the growth of rice seedlings under sufficient O2 and ethylene inhibitor (1-MCP) under stagnant flooding leads to the suppression of aerenchyma formation. Moreover, it has also been reported that the ACO genes ACO8 and ACO3 are strongly induced in submerged rice shoots, whereas ACO1 is negatively regulated. The comparison of the tolerant (M202-Sub1) and the intolerant (M202) accessions showed that ethylene is significantly higher in the genotypes that are submergence-intolerant compared with the tolerant genotype [105]. This process is regulated transcriptionally by ACS gene ACS2, which is repressed in the tolerant genotype. Thus, understanding the biosynthesis of ethylene in flood-tolerant plants could be useful for enhancing the tolerance of food crops.
Thus, in general, under abiotic stress, increased production of ethylene occurs due to the generation of ROS that activates the MAPK cascade, which leads to ethylene formation through the activation of the ACS and ACO genes. However, reports of decreased ethylene production under certain stresses have been reported, which makes the role of ethylene rather specific to the plant type, growth condition, timing, and organ under study.
4.2. Regulation of Ethylene Signaling for Environmental Stress Acclimation
Ethylene’s presence affects a plant’s tolerance to various environmental stresses [3] through multiple levels of regulation [22]. Ethylene can differentially regulate photosynthesis and growth to mediate plant adaptation to different environments [106]. It regulates ROS metabolism by modulating enzymatic antioxidants [107]. Ethylene-induced ERFs play an important role in redox regulation [108]. According to Jesperson et al. [109], ethylene plays a vital role in thermotolerance and maintains the functional integrity and stability of plant cells in creeping bentgrass. Interestingly, it was also reported that a low ethylene concentration facilitates the activation of defense signaling in plants, and a high concentration inhibits defense signaling in cucumber and wheat [6,110]. Therefore, these findings suggest that appropriate endogenous ethylene levels and low ethylene sensitivity could efficiently ameliorate heat-induced oxidative stress in different plant species. Moreover, heat shock proteins upregulate ERF1 overexpression in Arabidopsis, and upgrade the tolerance to heat in transgenic lines compared with the wild type by increasing the expression of heat tolerance genes [111]. Ethylene-mediated signaling confers thermotolerance in plants and facilitates the regulation of heat shock factors in rice seedlings [112]. Furthermore, ethylene signaling develops heat resistance and maintains chlorophyll content by reducing oxidative stress or involving genes related to ethylene signaling in plants [112]. Xu et al. [113] reported that ERF021 exhibits a noted 78.7-fold initiation under heat stress, signifying ethylene’s function in the tolerance to heat stress in soybean. Additionally, pollen development under heat stress upregulates multiple ethylene-responsive genes (ER5, ER21, LeJERF1, and ER24) involved in ethylene signaling in Solanum lycopersicum [114]. ERF3 also regulates ROS metabolism in tobacco, resulting in lower accumulation of ROS and enhancing tolerance to various abiotic stresses [115]. The ethylene biosynthesis and signaling-related genes ACO1, ACO4, EREB, and ETR4 are also significantly up-regulated during heat stress in tomatoes [116]. Interestingly, etr1 and ein2 mutants under heat stress exhibited a lower survival rate, suggesting the involvement of ethylene in acquiring thermotolerance in Arabidopsis [117]. Stress-induced ethylene acts to trigger stress-related effects in plants. Exogenous ethephon causes thermotolerance through its effect on several stress-related proteins responsible for plant cells’ functional integrity and stability [118]. Ethylene signaling reduces oxidative stress and maintains the chlorophyll content and thermotolerance [112]. Contrarily, the inhibition of ethylene by AVG delays the heat stress-induced effect on leaf senescence by upregulating antioxidant enzyme activities in creeping bentgrass [119]. The overexpression of ERF1 in Arabidopsis improves heat stress tolerance by enhancing the expression of heat-tolerance genes [111].
Reports suggested that, among all of the different metals, Cd was thought to be a more phytotoxic inorganic ion, stimulating ethylene production in plants [120]. A strong line of evidence has shown the multiple facets of ethylene in plant responses under heavy metal stresses, depending upon the endogenous ethylene concentration and ethylene sensitivities that differ in the developmental stages of plant species [121,122]. A recent study suggested that ethylene biosynthesis plays an important role in Nelumbo nucifera’s response to Cd stress, maintains appropriate ethylene levels and low ethylene sensitivity, and improves Cd tolerance via efficient antioxidant defenses [123]. Several studies also suggested that the exogenous application of ethylene plays a crucial role in adapting to heavy metal stress in rice [124]. Asgher et al. [125] showed that ethylene promotes Cd stress tolerance in mustard. Singh et al. [126] suggested that the ethylene precursor ACC improves plant tolerance under arsenic (As) stress in Arabidopsis. The application of ethephon (ethylene source) significantly decreases oxidative stress, regulates antioxidant metabolism by maintaining a higher level of GSH, and alleviates photosynthetic inhibition under nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) stress through the optimization of endogenous ethylene or ethylene homeostasis in mustard [121]. These findings reveal ethylene’s complex and biphasic regulatory function, which likely depends on the endogenous ethylene concentrations under heavy metal stresses, which differ between plant species. The ethylene-regulated photosynthetic processes depend on the sensitivity of plants to ethylene. Thus, ethylene sensitivity has been used as a tool for augmenting the photosynthetic potential of plants under heavy metal stress. Moreover, heavy metals, such as Cd and Cu, increase ACS activity in Solanum tuberosum [127], and the optimum level of ethylene synthesis aids in the scavenging of ROS [10]. Optimizing endogenous levels in plants has led to the development of transgenic crops with improved heavy metal tolerance [122]. Decreased ethylene production was confirmed by using acs2-1acs6-1 double knockout, which positively affected leaf biomass and resulted in a delayed induction of ethylene-responsive gene expressions without significant differences in the Cd contents between wild-type and mutant plants; additionally, the expressions of ERF1 and ACO2 in the wild-type is significantly higher compared with those of the mutant in Arabidopsis [91]. It has also been reported that EIN2 works as a positive regulator in lead (Pb) resistance in Arabidopsis [128]. Ethylene acts critically in enhancing ROS accumulation, playing the role of a signaling agent for provoking defense machinery. It has also been reported that ethylene signaling plays a positive or negative role in seed germination and seedling growth under saline stress. Ethylene receptor ETR2 was found to be a positive regulator involved in boosting seed germination under saline stress conditions in Arabidopsis [129]. Exogenous ethylene supplementation improves plant growth and development by strengthening the antioxidant system under salt stress [13,14]. Exogenous ethylene optimizes endogenous ethylene and ACS activity, strengthening the antioxidant system and eventually improving salinity tolerance in mustard [10]. A rise in ethylene production was also found in the salt-adapted callus of sunflower, in which ethylene production is related to stress tolerance [130]. In contrast, salinity does not enhance ethylene production in maize [131]. These findings suggest that the increased rate of ethylene production, as a consequence of salt stress, actually causes some of the symptoms of stress or induces acclimation processes [132]. Moreover, ethylene-mediated molecular mechanisms are implicated in the acclimation response to salt stress through the regulation of free proline accumulation and increased ROS scavenging in Arabidopsis [133]. The application of ethylene or its precursor ACC improves plant tolerance to high salinity, largely by increasing the expression of ROS scavengers [62,134]. In other words, ethylene signaling factor EIN3/EIL1 provokes ROS gene utterance to prevent ROS buildup and thus increases salt tolerance because the signaling action of ethylene depends upon the concentration of ROS [135]. A study by Lin et al. [135] indicated that OsWAK112, a wall-associated kinase, negatively regulates plant salt stress responses by inhibiting ethylene production. Additionally, the optimal ethylene level for normal plant growth might vary between different stages and in different plant species, such as Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa [136]. The overexpression of the metal-binding metalloenzyme encoded by OsARD1 elevates the endogenous ethylene to reduce the sensitivity of rice plants to salt. This suggests that ethylene plays an important role in salt tolerance in plants [137]. Interestingly, ethylene receptors are negative regulators of ethylene signaling, and the inhibition of ethylene receptors has been observed during salinity stress in several plant species. In Arabidopsis, osmotic and salt stress reduce the expression of ETR1 [6]. It has been reported that the loss of the mutant of the ethylene receptor (etr) is associated with enhanced tolerance, while the gain of etr-1 is associated with increased sensitivity to salinity stress in rice [124]. Salt stress enhances the ethylene receptor NTHK1 mRNA level in tobacco plants [6]. Several ethylene receptor genes, such as ETR1, ETR2, and EIN4; ethylene signaling genes, such as EIN3, ERF1, ERF2, and CTR1; and MAPK cascade genes, such as MEKK1–MKK2–MPK4/6, are modulated in cotton under both short and long salt treatment periods [6]. In contrast, NTHK1 interacts with an ankyrin domain-containing protein NEIP2 (NTHK1), an ethylene receptor-interacting protein, to improve salinity stress tolerance in tobacco [138]. These findings suggest the negative regulation of ethylene receptors in salinity stress tolerance and indicate ethylene as a positive mediator of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Moreover, many salt concentrations stimulate EBF1/2 deprivation and increase the accumulation of the EIN3 protein in an EIN2-independent manner [6]. In addition, salt stress increases EIN3 transcriptional activity in an EIN2-dependent manner in rice [139]. ETR1 and ERS1 mediate ethylene and H2O2 signaling, highlighting the ethylene-mediated regulation of H2O2 concentrations during salinity stress in the guard cells of Arabidopsis leaves [140]. Further, salt stress up-regulates the genes associated with Ca2+ signaling and ABA biosynthesis in the leaves of ETR2B, demonstrating the ethylene receptor’s role in salt stress intercede by Ca2+ and the ABA signaling pathways in Cucurbita pepo [141]. Ethylene and salt stress in plants confirm that ethylene levels might positively or negatively affect plants’ responses to salt stress, suggesting that the fine-tuning of ethylene action might be necessary for salt stress tolerance in plants.
The induction of ERF1 gene expression after salt and dehydration stress is enhanced by ethylene signaling [111]. Arabidopsis with a constitutive promoter, 35S:ERF1, is drought-tolerant and exhibits gene expression and regulation under drought with a higher survival rate, leading to a low yield [3,142]. The study by Arraes et al. [142] stated that the ethylene gene CTR involved in signal transduction is downregulated under drought conditions. The ethylene response factor (OsERF109) negatively affects rice’s ethylene biosynthesis and drought tolerance [143]. Under drought stress, the eto 1 mutant of rice has an insensitive OsETOL1 protein with a high ethylene level, which helps the plant to survive [142]. Ethylene is involved in opening and closing the stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis mutant eto1 [144]. Interestingly, ethylene response factors EIN3 and ETR1 (responsible for ethylene signaling) are not involved in the stomatal closing movement. When plants are exposed to drought, ethylene causes leaf abscission, reducing water loss [145]. Under drought, the production of ethylene increases and results in an initial increase and subsequent decrease in ACC, suggesting that drought induces the de novo synthesis of ACS, the rate-controlling enzyme of the ethylene biosynthesis pathway [142]. Under flooding, increased ethylene production results in leaf abscission and senescence, seed germination, growth of adventitious roots, epinasty stimulation, and inhibition of shoot growth, as well as stomatal closing and flowering [146]. Ni et al. [147] reported that ethylene released under waterlogging stress in Helianthus annuus stems results in aerenchyma formation to facilitate gas exchange. This is mediated by ethylene, which induces ROS signaling and mediates aerenchyma formation through programmed cell death (PCD).
Transgenic tobacco plants with reduced ethylene biosynthesis under salinity stress show enhanced tolerance [148], and, upon exogenous supplementation of ethylene, rice shows hypersensitivity to salinity [108,149]. Similarly, increased ethylene production in rice under salt stress reduces plant growth, grain filling, and the development of spikelets [150], which are reversed by the application of 1-MCP (ethylene action inhibitor), in rice under salinity stress [151]. We cannot say that ethylene positively affects abiotic stress tolerance or negatively affects it unless we explore the whole mechanism that is affected under abiotic stress, including oxidative stress and antioxidative metabolism.
Ethylene accumulation plays a positive role in surviving flooding stress. In contrast to other stresses where gas diffusion is not impaired, gas exchange is severely restricted between the plant and its environment under flooding. Submergence promotes the biosynthesis of ethylene, which is entrapped in plant tissues, rapidly reaching response-saturating levels within 1–2 h [152,153]. This will initiate flood-adaptive responses. Ethylene moderates shoot growth towards the water’s surface, facilitating gas exchange with the atmosphere, developing adventitious roots, and maintaining the basic metabolism required to survive under submergence [101]. It has been suggested that utilizing the microbial enzyme ACC deaminase significantly decreases the ACC levels in plants, especially plants subjected to flooding stress, thereby decreasing the amount of stress ethylene and the subsequent damage to the plant by stress ethylene [103]. Accordingly, Huang et al. [154] stated that ethylene signaling bears importance in the survival of rice seedlings under submergence. It was revealed submergence activates ethylene signaling through the slight down-regulation of CTR1 and up-regulation of EIN3 genes via in silico analysis [155]. Moreover, ethylene ameliorates ROS during subsequent reoxygenation [101]. Interestingly, ethylene-induced adventitious root growth is mediated by the ROS activity of antioxidant enzymes in rice [124]. Further, several ERFs and genes aid rice plants under flooding conditions by enhancing the GA action essential for stem elongation [156]. Major ethylene signaling components (EIN2) and several AP2/ERF transcription factor gene family members have regulatory roles in plants under environmental stress [157]. Indeed, OsEIL1 is involved in the ethylene signal transduction pathway and positively regulates the ethylene response in rice [158]. The ethylene receptor in rice, OsETR2, is highly expressed in the internodes and is also induced by ethylene [159]. It has been found that the overexpression of OsETR2 reduces the ethylene concentration, and conversely, OsETR2 knockout plants show enhanced ethylene sensitivity in rice [160]. Thus, ethylene plays a notable role in plant adaptation to environmental stress by regulating several processes that influence plant growth and survival, including biosynthesis and signaling pathways (Figure 4). Table 1 shows some selected studies on the response of plants to ethylene modulators under major environmental stresses.
Ethylene in excess restricts plant growth by reducing the effect of auxins on the epidermal layer, which senses the environment and subsequently drives the growth of the inner tissues [168]. Mainly, it restricts plant growth by inhibiting cell elongation in crosstalk with auxin. At very low concentrations, ethylene is biologically active, and its sensitivity depends on the species and affects the plant response [169]. Organ or plant growth are controlled by affecting processes, such as cell division, expansion, or differentiation in different tissues [170], and ethylene potentially affects these functions. Studies have found that, in Arabidopsis, ERF5 and ERF6 improve leaf growth under environmental stress [171]. However, this is concentration and species-dependent [172,173]. There is a contrasting effect of ethylene on slow-growing and fast-growing Poa species, where slow-growing species are more responsive to ethylene and show greater leaf elongation inhibition compared with fast-growing species. However, a low level of ethylene promotes leaf elongation in slow-growing species, while slight inhibition occurs in fast-growing species at the same concentration [173]. Ethylene reduces the leaf area, perhaps due to leaf epinasty, which reduces light capture and thus reduces CO2 assimilation. Ethylene could regulate the growth of the leaf by inducing ROS, and nitric oxide (NO) is also involved in leaf expansion [174]. Thus, ethylene can act as a positive or negative regulator of growth, depending upon the ethylene concentration, plant type, and organ under study.
5. Potential Mechanisms Underlying Ethylene-Mediated Environmental Stress Tolerance and Plant Responses
Studies have suggested a potential role of ethylene in the synthesis of secondary metabolite and osmolytes and antioxidant metabolism under optimal and stressful conditions [165,175]. Ethylene also interacts with several nutrients and phytohormones, and modulates antioxidant defense and plant metabolism [14,176]. Therefore, this section explores the mechanisms underlying ethylene-mediated environmental stress tolerance and plant responses.
5.1. Ethylene Interaction with Secondary Metabolites, Osmolytes, and Carbohydrates
Secondary metabolites are substances that are biosynthetically derived from primary metabolites and produced by plants for defense. These metabolites are involved in plant metabolic activity. Secondary metabolites are beneficial for plant tolerance under stressful environments [8,177]. A recent study by Ma et al. [17] stated that melatonin primarily regulates the pathways of plant hormone signal transduction and secondary metabolite biosynthesis via ethylene, and suggested that ethylene is involved in the induction of secondary metabolite synthesis in plants. Melatonin induces the expression of VvMYB14, which increases ethylene production by transcriptionally activating VvACS1 and thereby affects the accumulation of secondary metabolites. Exogenous ethylene enhances Cd resistance by influencing terpenoid indole alkaloids’ biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus seedlings [178]. Exogenous ethylene upregulates the transcriptional expression of metallothionein and increases Cd accumulation in leaves. Papon et al. [179] reported that the ethylene signaling pathways and elements of cytokinin improve the production of terpenoid indole alkaloid through metabolic engineering. Ethylene combined with methyl-jasmonate (Me-JA) on phenolic compounds’ metabolic profiling in Pinus albicaulis suggests that the ethylene–MeJA combination controls phenolic metabolism [180]. Moreover, the ethylene response factor NtERF91 positively regulates alkaloid accumulation in tobacco [181]. These findings suggest that ethylene regulates the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. The biosynthesis and accumulation of metabolites rapidly change during stress to overcome the adverse effects of environmental stresses and play a role in plant stress tolerance. A recent study of Yadav et al. [182] reported that drought stress triggers the synthesis of secondary metabolites and secondary metabolite-mediated antioxidant machinery to scavenge ROS. They conducted expression analysis of genes encoding transcription factor ERFs, and found that they play a crucial role in drought response.
Ethylene regulates environmental stress tolerance by influencing different osmolytes [183]. Studies on ein2-5, and ein3-1 (ethylene insensitive) mutants also confirmed the involvement of ethylene in osmolyte biosynthesis. Ethylene increases the accumulation of compatible solutes and decreases oxidative stress to improve plant tolerance to water stress in Arabidopsis [166]. Osmolytes contribute to ROS detoxification induced by oxidative stress and increase the plant response to long-term stress. Amphoteric quaternary amines (glycine betaine) regulate water balance in a plant cell by stabilizing cellular structure and activity under drought stress [184]. Further, the enhanced accumulation of glycine betaine and reduced ethylene under salt stress increase the GSH content, lowering oxidative stress in rice [156]. Ethephon increases the photosynthetic-N-use efficiency, and proline and antioxidant metabolism to alleviate a decrease in photosynthesis under salinity stress in mustard [185]. The study of Nazar et al. [110] reported that drought stress-induced ethylene production is reduced, while proline accumulation and drought tolerance are improved with salicylic acid (SA). Further, proline plays a role in stress tolerance mechanisms as an ROS scavenger [185].
The exogenous application of ethephon improves carbohydrate metabolism under heat stress. Ethylene application reduces oxidative stress by enhancing enzymatic antioxidants and significantly increasing the sucrose and starch contents, and carbohydrate metabolism enzyme activities for heat tolerance in rice [15]. These soluble sugars work as a signal molecule to regulate different gene expressions involved in photosynthesis [184] and act directly as negative signals or modify the cell pathways to induce stress response signals and increase plant resistance to stress [186]. In another study, exogenous ethylene inhibited sprouting potato tubers by influencing their carbohydrate metabolism [187]. Endogenous ethylene regulates Medicago sativa embryo germination and influences the activity of α-amylase and the metabolism of soluble carbohydrates [188]. The study by Wang et al. [189] stated that ethylene significantly increases the fructose and glucose levels, but does not affect the sucrose and total soluble sugar contents in ripe jackfruit postharvest. Interestingly, fructose and glucose are hexoses, causing a massive alternation in sugars compared with cyclitol and scylloinositol. Glucose directly helps in the osmotic adjustment in different species, such as oak pine, but cyclitols primarily help to protect and stabilize the DNA structure under drought stress [190]. Ethylene increases glucose utilization by influencing the photosynthetic potential and sink strength, and reduces the glucose-mediated repression of photosynthesis in wheat under salt stress [165]. Moreover, the ethylene receptor ETR2 delays flowering and increases starch accumulation in stems by downregulating the genes in rice [160]. Interestingly, starch is emerging as a key molecule in mediating responses to different environmental stresses. Plants generally remobilize starch to provide energy and carbon during photosynthesis. The released sugars and derived metabolites support plant growth and development by mitigating the negative effect of stresses in ripening jackfruit [189].
5.2. Ethylene in the Modulation of Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants and Phytochelatins
The involvement of ethylene in the modulation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants has been widely reported to control plant tolerance to various environmental stresses [7,16,165]. Environmental stresses cause excess ROS generation and produce oxidative stress conditions. The application of ethylene alleviates the adverse effects of salt stress on the photosynthesis and growth of plants by enhancing the activity of enzymatic antioxidants, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR) [176]. Ethylene also modulates H2O2-metabolizing enzyme activities, such as those of catalase (CAT) and APX, in plants exposed to salt stress [10]. Under Cd stress, ethylene is involved in selenium-induced defense responses through the antioxidant system [191]. Ethylene and S applications are responsible for lowering ethylene formation to the optimal range and synthesizing the maximal GSH production to protect the plants from Cd-induced oxidative stress [113]. It has been reported that the S-containing metabolite methionine is a precursor of ethylene and is a rate-limiting metabolite for ethylene production [113]. There is an interrelationship between S assimilation and ethylene signaling responsible for plant vigor under optimal and stressful environments [4]. Under salt stress, ethylene regulates a plant’s responses to excess S and increases the contents of cysteine (Cys) and GSH [7]. It has been suggested that ethylene works as a stimulant for producing pharmaceutically important non-enzymatic antioxidants in chamomile leaves [192]. Indeed, ethylene also regulates antioxidant metabolism under salt stress to increase the photosynthetic potential of mustard grown with optimum and low N levels [185].
Interestingly, another potential mechanism underlying ethylene-mediated environmental stress tolerance is the activation of the elements in the promoter region of the heavy metal-responsive genes and the metal chelator phytochelatins [193]. Phytochelatins are synthesized from GSH and play an important role in the heavy metal defense mechanism. It has been reported that ethylene influences phytochelatin synthesis at the molecular or gene expression level. The report by Keunen et al. [89] suggested that several toxic metals induce ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in various plant species, but it depends on the plant species and type and concentration of heavy metal treatment. It was also described that the induction of stress ethylene causes non-beneficial symptoms in plants, and the application of an ethylene inhibitor completely reduces the negative effect of heavy metals [194]. The absence of ethylene (due to an ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor) causes a decrease in the phytochelatin synthesis activity and the amount of –SH groups in plants [195]. However, only a few reports are available on the direct relationship between phytochelatin and ethylene under heavy metal stress; therefore, it is more likely that its possible role in ethylene signaling under different environmental stresses awaits further scrutiny.
In Arabidopsis, ETO1 increases ROS formation and maintains Na+/K+ homeostasis. Under different stress conditions and during various growth stages, ethylene-regulated downstream signaling generally relies upon ROS [3], and increased ROS signals for an increase in antioxidative enzymes. In Arabidopsis exposed to ozone stress, GSH synthesis is enhanced, which is regulated by ethylene [18]. Ethylene is thought to be involved in the Se-induced antioxidant system that improves growth under Cd stress [191]. Ethylene triggers the antioxidative defense system in plants, which reduces oxidative stress and maintains growth and photosynthetic efficiency [183]. ACC, which acts as an ethylene precursor, enhances the activities of the antioxidant enzymes APX, CAT, SOD, and POX and reduces lipid peroxidation in plants [88]. Takács et al. [107] reported that ethylene regulates ROS metabolism by modulating antioxidant enzymes. Ethylene-induced ERFs are known to play a role in redox regulation and are themselves induced by stress [108].
5.3. Ethylene and Nutrient Responses
The availability of mineral nutrients plays a vital role in plants’ optimal growth and development. Several reports demonstrated an association between ethylene and nutrient metabolism under environmental stresses [4,8,90]. Mineral nutrients influence ethylene biosynthesis by supporting a close interaction between ethylene stimuli and nutrient homeostasis, such as ethylene and S [10], ethylene and K [196], ethylene and calcium (Ca) [197], ethylene and N plus S [14], etc. Ethylene interacts with nutrient uptake, such as that of S and N, minimizes oxidative stress, and controls plant responses under optimal and stressful conditions [10,13,185]. A recent study by Yu et al. [198] stated that Ca signaling plays a vital role in the adventitious root formation under salt stress by regulating endogenous ethylene synthesis and the signal transduction pathway in cucumber. Ethylene has also been implicated in regulating physiological and morphological plant responses to nutrient deficiencies. The deficiency of mineral nutrients appears to interact with ethylene production and sensitivity. Ethylene is essential in regulating phosphorous deficiency and induces developmental and physiological changes [199]. Ethylene also mediates root responses to boron deficiency [200]. Similarly, in Arabidopsis, ethylene is related to N deficiency [201], inducing the ethylene production signaling pathway. Ethylene regulation has also been extended in response to other deficiencies, such as K, S, and many more [4,202,203]. Moreover, ethylene signaling is responsible for root morphology and whole plant tolerance changes to low-K conditions [196].
5.4. Ethylene Crosstalk with Phytohormones
Several plant hormones, such as auxin, cytokinin, ABA, GA, SA, etc., can influence ethylene production [11,16,22,159,166,204]. In particular, the hormones auxin and cytokinin impact ethylene evolution more than the other hormones. The increment in auxin stimulates ethylene evolution by de novo ACS synthesis. Likewise, cytokinins in a high amount increase ethylene production. Ethylene production is noteworthy with auxins and cytokinins compared with the hormone alone. It has been reported that the developmental plasticity of the plant root is regulated by the auxin–ethylene interaction under high salinity and water stress, and the stress-induced remodeling of root architecture confers stress tolerance in plants [205]. It has also been reported that ethylene signaling acts synergistically with auxin to mediate aluminum (Al) stress-induced root growth inhibition in Arabidopsis [206]. Notwithstanding, it is unclear whether endogenous ABA limits ethylene synthesis precursor ACC or the change of ACC to ethylene. Ethylene prevents polar auxin transport, although the hormone indole acetic acid (IAA) stimulates ethylene synthesis. Accordingly, ethylene might bring down the measure of operative IAA, which might diminish the step of ethylene synthesis. The significant collaborative impact of IAA and ethylene appears to be responsible for reducing the tissue response to ethylene. Mathieu et al. [207] showed that ABA and JA are more noteworthy in this process; however, the synthesis of ACC is lower in chicory plants. Ethylene emanation remained continually high during the 5 h examination, yet ABA, SA, and JA diminished in Melissa officinalis leaves [208]. The concentrations of ABA, ACC, and JA, were essentially greater in leaves; in contrast, the IAA and cytokinins diminished in plants pre-accustomed to high temperatures [209]. Cytokinin and ABA inhibited primary root growth by regulating ACS at the post-transcriptional level with increased ethylene synthesis. It has been reported that the increased ethylene due to Al stress increases the expression of cytokinin biosynthetic genes encoding IPTs, leading to root growth inhibition [210]. Interestingly, the overexpression of cytokinin repressor genes, ARRs, serves as a mediator of the crosstalk between ethylene and cytokinin in the cold stress response and confers freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis [211]. It has also been suggested that the knockouts of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling genes in Arabidopsis result in altered plant sensitivity to ABA and, accordingly, affect the ABA-dependent abiotic stress tolerance in several developmental processes. For example, the Arabidopsis loss-of-function mutant (acs7) with reduced endogenous ethylene levels is hypersensitive to ABA, accumulates higher levels of endogenous ABA, and displays enhanced salt tolerance during seed germination and seedling growth [212]. Moreover, it has also been reported that both ethylene and ABA act antagonistically in controlling plant growth and development and under abiotic stress conditions [213]. Ethylene application with S coordinately modulates the accumulation of ABA for salinity stress tolerance in mustard plants [10]. Higher brassinosteroids promote ethylene biosynthesis via enhancing ACS, but are repressed by ABA [22,204]. It has also been reported that both ethylene and brassinosteroids are involved in plant responses to environmental stresses [114,214]. Brassinosteroids induce ethylene biosynthesis and ROS generation, which subsequently enhance the AOX capacity, leading to increased salt and drought stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus [215]. Brassinosteroids ameliorate the inhibitory effect of salt by regulating ethylene production via the recovery of the NaCl-induced suppression of ACO activity in ethylene production [216]. Moreover, brassinosteroids affect ethylene biosynthesis and signaling by increasing ACS and stabilizing EILs in Solanum lycopersicum under salinity stress [217]. Major ethylene and JA signaling hubs, such as EIN2, EIN3, and AP2/ERF, and the JAZ proteins CTR1 and MYC2, have complex regulatory functions during the adaptation of plants to abiotic stress [157]. It has been shown that EIN3/EIL1 positively regulates JA-dependent root hair development and thus enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [166]. Ethylene and NO interact to regulate magnesium deficiency-induced root hair development in Arabidopsis [218]. Under changing environments or abiotic stress, the ethylene and NO interaction mechanisms contribute to the stress tolerance of crops with increased yield [219]. It has been shown that SNP (NO donor) induces MfSAMS1 expression, resulting in an elevated SAM level, polyamine concentration, and polyamine oxidation under cold stress in Medicago sativa. Similarly, altered ethylene emissions have been observed parallel with the enhanced tolerance to cold stress [220]. This report indicated that SAM synthetase plays an important role in plant tolerance upon cold stress by up-regulating polyamine oxidation and improving H2O2-induced antioxidant protection. Moreover, transient NO and ROS production and down-regulated ETR1 expression have been observed after treatment with the non-protein amino acid β-aminobutyric acid, improving the drought tolerance of Solanum tuberosum [219]. Further, the interaction between ethylene and GA alleviates Cd stress in mustard by inducing S-assimilation [16]. Moreover, Masood et al. [221] also stated that ethylene and GA interplay in the regulation of photosynthetic capacity inhibition. Both these hormones, ethylene and GA, influence each other’s actions; GA is known to increase ethylene synthesis. On the other hand, its signaling is affected by ethylene; therefore, this interaction affects stress tolerance in plants [221]. A recent report showed that SA-supplemented plants exhibit reduced stress ethylene generation under heat exposure by decreasing the ACC and ACS activities to an appropriate range [222]. Interestingly, ethylene intervenes in SA’s effect in the presence of sulfate to induce S-assimilation, upregulates the antioxidant system, and imparts salt tolerance in plants [166].
6. Summarizing Ethylene Formation under Stress and the Mechanism of Action
Ethylene production increases in plants under stress. The same mechanism that produces ethylene under normal conditions produces excess ethylene under stress [223]. However, the process varies regarding the activation of the ACS by stress. Stearn and Glick [223] reported that, in the presence of stress, there is a small peak in the ethylene content within a few hours of exposure, which utilizes the existing ACC present in plants, but then, after a few days of stress, the level of ethylene sharply rises. The enhancement of ACC formation and ACS activity, and the rise in the ethylene level are the key reasons. Thus, as we know that ACS formation is activated by MAPK [122], which itself is influenced by stress, the ethylene level increases under stress. Summarizing our knowledge of ethylene signaling, it can be said that the ethylene response occurs by binding the ethylene to receptors and thus silencing them, facilitating ethylene responses. Under stress, this ethylene response aids in plants’ adaptation until the burst of ethylene occurs, which causes senescence and plant death. In leaves of plants exposed to environmental stress, ethylene appears to have a negative effect on the cell cycle [9]. It plays a dual role under stress when it regulates a defense response in fully grown leaves, but a growth response in young leaves [9]. A high level of ethylene in leaves causes the rapid inhibition of cell division and cell expansion, which could occur either through DELLA-mediated mechanisms or through the expression of EXPANSIN genes in the cell cycle. Reduction in growth under stress is a favorable response because it reduces the wastage of energy when plants are coping with a change in conditions that disturbs homeostasis. Thus, although excess ethylene is harmful to plants, a lower ethylene level initiates growth responses, as in the case of young leaves mentioned by Dubois et al. [9]. The application of ethephon induces the release of ethylene and controls the endogenous ethylene level and function [224]. The inhibition of excess ethylene is favorable, as has been reported under various stress conditions. The application of SA suppresses ethylene formation under drought stress, which results in increased photosynthesis and growth [225]. Ethephon treatment results in an increase in the GSH content and antioxidative metabolism, which lead to stress removal and subsequently increased photosynthesis and growth [15,165]. The initial rise in ethylene during stress is a signaling response to initiate defense in plants, which is concurrent with the rising ROS level and a subsequent increase in antioxidants. It may be said that ethylene can promote growth if the level of ethylene is kept at the initial peak level, which is generally achieved through the application of an ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor that reduces the ethylene level, or through the use of chemicals that either inhibit the ethylene level or alleviate antioxidative mechanism. Ethylene in itself is a beneficial signaling molecule for plant growth, provided that it is kept at an optimum concentration. In several studies, ethephon application has been shown to inhibit the release of ethylene [15,121]. Upon ethephon addition, the ethylene released binds to receptors and initiates signaling. It directs GSH synthesis, and the pool of methionine that was being utilized for SAM synthesis to form ethylene is now diverted to GSH, leading to a low ethylene level even under stress [122]. GSH pre-treatment reduces ROS and inhibits the activation of MAPK3 and MAPK6, which are reported to be involved in the regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in Cd-stressed Arabidopsis [226,227,228].
The response of ethylene under different abiotic stresses varies. It may, on the one hand, increase the antioxidative enzymes that scavenge ROS and reduce oxidative stress in plants to protect proteins, nucleic acid, and membranes from damage. On the other hand, it may regulate osmolytes, nutrients, and other phytohormones for stress tolerance. Depending upon the type of stress, the response of ethylene also varies. It was found that ethylene regulates ROS signaling, which enhances antioxidants, but under conditions of drought and salt stress, ethylene rather plays a defensive role that leads to plants’ adjustment under stress. It may enhance senescence, reduce stomatal opening, or increase the growth of adventitious roots that aid in water absorption under limited water availability. Stomatal closure stops water loss, while senescence may lead to the redistribution of nutrients in the sink organ. Ethylene has been shown to take part in enhancing sink activity [229]. Thus, the role of ethylene under stress could be promoting, reducing, or adjusting against stress; however, unequivocally, it always plays a role in abiotic stress; therefore, it becomes crucial to study the different stress-response proteins and their influence on ethylene under different abiotic stresses. The impact of ethylene on root architecture under different stress and whether it is acting in promoting or inhibiting growth should receive focus. If it increases growth, then what is the mechanism involved, and if it inhibits growth, then what are the processes involved should be explained. This will completely clarify the role of ethylene under different stresses. The interaction of ethylene with different plant growth regulators should also be explored, as we know that ethylene affects various growth regulators that are involved in stress tolerance.
7. Conclusions
The regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and the signaling transduction pathway by the influence of environmental stress and the influence of ethylene on stress responses has been discussed in this review. The optimum level of ethylene biosynthesis range and signaling pathway regulate various metabolic processes and modulate the antioxidant defense in plants, which varies from plant to plant. Ethylene interacts with secondary metabolites, osmolytes, and carbohydrates, and induces potential mechanisms in plants for stress tolerance. The interaction of ethylene with nutrients and phytohormones helps to promote plant growth by inducing plant metabolism.
In summary, this review provides insights into the role of ethylene signaling in regulating plant processes and developing sustainable crop production under optimal and environmental stress conditions. The collaborative knowledge and new perspectives of ethylene signaling will play a vital role in regulating plant growth and development, as well as stress tolerance to promote survival and acclimatize to varying environments. Detailed studies on ethylene biosynthesis and signaling could contribute to the applications of biotechnological strategies for developing improved and new variants of crops in response to different environmental stresses. Ethylene application to various types of agricultural interest may be expanded in the coming years for agribusiness purposes. The future concern is to focus on identifying ethylene’s antagonistic and synergistic role with other signaling cues and uncover more factual data on ethylene’s interplay with other hormones and environmental factors.
Conceptualization, M.F. and N.A.K.; validation, M.F. and N.I.; resources, M.F., Z.S., F.R. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F., N.I. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.F., N.I. and N.A.K.; supervision, N.A.K.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Ethylene biosynthesis with the methionine precursor and the intermediate synthesized as 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in higher plants through the Methionine/Yang cycle. Ethylene biosynthesis is the conversion of S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) from methionine to ACC by ACC synthase (ACS). Methionine is reproduced within the Yang cycle. The Yang cycle is a set of reactions that recycle 5-methylthioadenosine to methionine.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Ethylene biosynthesis in plants and its biosynthetic and action inhibitors. Biosynthetic inhibitors: AOA, aminooxyacetic acid; AVG, aminoethoxyvinylglycine; AOIB, 2-aminooxyisobutryic acid; Co2+, cobalt; ethanol; and low O2 Action inhibitors: Silver nitrate (AgNO3) or silver thiosulfate (STS), 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), norbornadiene (NBD), and trans-cyclooctene.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Mechanism of the ethylene signaling pathway in plants. Ethylene receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 (ETR1), ETR2, ETHYLENE RESPONSE SENSOR1 (ERS1), ERS2, and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE4 (EIN4) are present on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. In the absence of ethylene, ethylene receptors activate the CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1 (CTR1) protein kinase, which, in turn, phosphorylates the C-terminal end of EIN2 (EIN2-CEND) and turns off EIN2’s function. In the cytosol, the m-RNA F-box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 (EBF1/2) are translated and target the transcription regulation of ethylene signaling. ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3/ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE 1 (EIN3/EIL1), functioning in the proteasome for protein turnover, is degraded in the nucleus, thus preventing ethylene responses. When ethylene is available, ethylene receptors no longer activate CTR1, dephosphorylate EIN2, and cleave, thus releasing EIN2-CEND, which functions in the cytoplasm and nucleus. In the cytoplasm, one fate of EIN2-CEND is to bind the RNAs for EBF1 and EBF2, become sequestered in processing bodies (P-bodies), and inhibit their translation. The other fate of EIN2-CEND is that it shuttles into the nucleus and directly or indirectly potentiates the activity of EIN3 and EIL1 via EIN2 nuclear-associated protein 1 (ENAP1). In the nucleus, EIN3/EIL1 regulates the transcriptional cascade involving transcriptional factors.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling for environmental stress acclimation. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; ACS, ACC synthase; CDPK, calcium-dependent protein kinase; Ca2+, calcium signaling; CTR1, CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE1; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAMS, SAM synthetase; ETR1, ETHYLENE RESPONSE1; ERS1, ETHYLENE RESPONSE SENSOR1; EIN4, ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE4; EIL, ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE 1; ERFs, ethylene-responsive factors; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase.
Selected studies on the response of plants to ethylene modulators under different environmental stresses.
| Plant Name | Ethylene Concentration/Modulators | Stress Type | Parameter Studied | Response | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat stress | |||||
| Oryza sativa | 10 μM ACC | Heat stress | Heat shock factors, such as HSFA1a and HSFA2a, c, d, e, and f, and ethylene signaling genes | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Oryza sativa | 1.6 mM ethephon | Heat stress | ACS, ACO gene expression, and psbA and psbB genes | Decreased tolerance compared with increased stress plant | [ |
| Heavy metal stress | |||||
| Brassica juncea | 200 µL L−1 ethephon | 1.2 mM Cr and 50 µM Cd | ATP-sulfurylase, serine acetyl transferase, and GSH | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Brassica juncea | 200 µL L−1 ethephon | 50 µM Cd | Net photosynthesis Ethylene content and GSH content | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Brassica juncea | 200 µL L−1 ethephon | 50 µM Cd | Ethylene, glucose, ACS, and increased PSII activity (except NPQ) | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 20 µM ACC | 400 µM Cr | H2O2 accumulation (Staining) | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 20 µM Ag and Co | 400 µM Cr | H2O2 accumulation (Staining) | Decreased tolerance | [ |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 0.5 µM ACC | 75 µM CdCl2 | Superoxide accumulation | Decreased tolerance | [ |
| Brassica juncea | 200 µL L−1 ethephon | 200 mg kg−1 Zn | ACS activity and ethylene | Decreased tolerance compared with stress plants | [ |
| Salt stress | |||||
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 100 µM AOA and 100 µM ACC | 100 mM NaCl | Antioxidant metabolism | No significant effect | [ |
| Amaranthus caudatus | 0.01, 0.1, and 0.3 mM ethephon | 25, 75, and 125 mM NaCl | Seed germination | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Brassica juncea | 200 µL L−1 ethephon | 100 mM NaCl | Reduced oxidative markers and increased antioxidants | Decreased tolerance |
[ |
| Triticum aestivum | 200 µL L−1 ethephon | 100 mM NaCl | psbA and psbB expression | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Drought, flooding, and cold stress | |||||
| Triticum aestivum | 0.1 µM ACC | Mild drought | Relative growth rate | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | Col-0; ein2-5ein3-1 | Drought stress | Proline, P5CS1 mRNA, and soluble sugar higher in Col-0Oxidative stress higher in ein2-5ein3-1 | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Oryza sativa | 10 μM ACC | Flooding | Chlorophyll content | Increased tolerance | [ |
| Vitis amurensis, |
100 μM AVG | Cold | ACC and ACO contents, and ethylene production | Decreased tolerance | [ |
References
1. Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A.; Ferrante, A.; Trivellini, A.; Francini, A.; Khan, M.I. Ethylene role in plant growth, development and senescence: Interaction with other phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci.; 2017; 8, 475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00475] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28421102]
2. Mehrotra, R.; Bhalothia, P.; Bansal, P.; Basantani, M.K.; Bharti, V.; Mehrotra, S. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance—Different tiers of regulation. J. Plant Physiol.; 2014; 171, pp. 486-496. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.12.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24655384]
3. Husain, T.; Fatima, A.; Suhel, M.; Singh, S.; Sharma, A.; Prasad, S.M.; Singh, V.P. A brief appraisal of ethylene signaling under abiotic stress in plants. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2020; 15, 1782051. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2020.1782051] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32692940]
4. Iqbal, N.; Trivellini, A.; Masood, A.; Ferrante, A.; Khan, N.A. Current understanding on ethylene signaling in plants: The influence of nutrient availability. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2013; 73, pp. 128-138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.09.011]
5. Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Verma, S.; Pandith, S.A.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene supplementation increases PSII efficiency and alleviates chromium-inhibited photosynthesis through increased nitrogen and sulfur assimilation in mustard. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2018; 37, pp. 1300-1317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9858-z]
6. Riyazuddin, R.; Verma, R.; Singh, K.; Nisha, N.; Keisham, M.; Bhati, K.K.; Kim, S.T.; Gupta, R. Ethylene: A master regulator of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Biomolecules; 2020; 10, 959. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10060959] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630474]
7. Nazar, R.; Khan, M.I.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Involvement of ethylene in reversal of salt-inhibited photosynthesis by sulfur in mustard. Physiol. Planta.; 2014; 152, pp. 331-344. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12173]
8. Khan, M.I.; Nazir, F.; Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Selenium and sulfur influence ethylene formation and alleviate cadmium-induced oxidative stress by improving proline and glutathione production in wheat. J. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 173, pp. 9-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.09.011]
9. Dubois, M.; Van den Broeck, L.; Inzé, D. The pivotal role of ethylene in plant growth. Trends Plant Sci.; 2018; 23, pp. 311-323. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.003]
10. Fatma, M.; Iqbal, N.; Gautam, H.; Sehar, Z.; Sofo, A.; D’Ippolito, I.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene and sulfur coordinately modulate the antioxidant system and ABA accumulation in mustard plants under salt stress. Plants; 2021; 10, 180. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10010180]
11. Abeles, F.B.; Morgan, P.W.; Saltveit, M.E. Ethylene in Plant Biology; 2nd ed. Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
12. Sisler, E.C. The discovery and development of compounds counteracting ethylene at the receptor level. Biotechnol. Advan.; 2006; 24, pp. 357-367. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.01.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16524683]
13. Jahan, B.; Rasheed, F.; Sehar, Z.; Fatma, M.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Coordinated role of nitric oxide, ethylene, nitrogen, and sulfur in plant salt stress tolerance. Stresses; 2021; 1, pp. 181-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/stresses1030014]
14. Jahan, B.; Iqbal, N.; Fatma, M.; Sehar, Z.; Masood, A.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene supplementation combined with split application of nitrogen and sulfur protects salt-inhibited photosynthesis through optimization of proline metabolism and antioxidant system in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plants; 2021; 10, 1303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10071303] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199061]
15. Gautam, H.; Fatma, M.; Sehar, Z.; Iqbal, N.; Albaqami, M.; Khan, N.A. Exogenously-sourced ethylene positively modulates photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and antioxidant defense to enhance heat tolerance in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 1031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162955]
16. Masood, A.; Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A. Role of ethylene in alleviation of cadmium-induced photosynthetic capacity inhibition by sulphur in mustard. Plant Cell Environ.; 2012; 35, pp. 524-533. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02432.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21950968]
17. Ma, W.; Xu, L.; Gao, S.; Lyu, X.; Cao, X.; Yao, Y. Melatonin alters the secondary metabolite profile of grape berry skin by promoting VvMYB14-mediated ethylene biosynthesis. Hortic. Res.; 2021; 8, 43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00478-2]
18. Yoshida, S.; Tamaoki, M.; Ioki, M.; Ogawa, D.; Sato, Y.; Aono, M.; Kubo, A.; Saji, S.; Saji, H.; Satoh, S. et al. Ethylene and salicylic acid control glutathione biosynthesis in ozone-exposed Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant.; 2009; 136, pp. 284-298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01220.x]
19. Groen, S.C.; Whiteman, N.K. The evolution of ethylene signaling in plant chemical ecology. J. Chem. Ecol.; 2014; 40, pp. 700-716. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0474-5]
20. Maillard, P.; Thepenier, C.; Gudin, C. Determination of an ethylene biosynthesis pathway in the unicellular green alga, Haematococcus pluvialis. Relationship between growth and ethylene production. J. Appl. Phycol.; 1993; 5, pp. 93-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02182426]
21. Pech, J.C.; Bouzayen, M.; Latché, A. Climacteric fruit ripening: Ethylene-dependent and independent regulation of ripening pathways in melon fruit. Plant Sci.; 2008; 175, pp. 114-120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.01.003]
22. Chen, H.; Bullock, D.A., Jr.; Alonso, J.M.; Stepanova, A.N. To Fight or to Grow: The balancing role of ethylene in plant abiotic stress responses. Plants; 2021; 11, 33. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11010033] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009037]
23. Wang, K.L.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell; 2002; 14, pp. 131-151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.001768] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12045274]
24. Adams, D.O.; Yang, S.F. Ethylene biosynthesis: Identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1979; 76, pp. 170-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.1.170] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16592605]
25. Boller, T.; Herner, R.C.; Kende, H. Assay for and enzymatic formation of an ethylene precursor, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Planta; 1979; 145, pp. 293-303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00454455]
26. Yang, S.F.; Hoffman, N.E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.; 1984; 35, pp. 155-189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103]
27. Kende, H. Ethylene biosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.; 1993; 44, pp. 283-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001435]
28. Bleecker, A.B.; Kende, H. Ethylene: A gaseous signal molecule in plants. Ann. Rev. Cell Develop. Biol.; 2000; 16, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.1]
29. Hu, W.W.; Gong, H.; Pua, E.C. Molecular cloning and characterization of S-adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase genes from mustard (Brassica juncea). Physiol. Planta; 2005; 124, pp. 25-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00500.x]
30. Choi, J.; Eom, S.; Shin, K.; Lee, R.A.; Choi, S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.; Soh, M.S. Identification of lysine histidine transporter 2 as an 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana by transgenic complementation approach. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 1092. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01092]
31. Druege, U. Ethylene and plant responses to abiotic stress. Ethylene Action in Plants; 1st ed. Khan, N.A. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 81-118.
32. Luckner, M. Secondary Metabolism in Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals; 2nd ed. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; pp. 12-543.
33. Wink, M. Special Nitrogen Metabolism. Plant Biochemistry; Dey, P.M.; Harborne, J.B. Academic Press: San Deigo, CA, USA, London, UK, 1997; pp. 439-486.
34. Rensing, S.A.; Lang, D.; Zimmer, A.D.; Terry, A.; Salamov, A.; Shapiro, H.; Nishiyama, T.; Perroud, P.F.; Lindquist, E.A.; Kamisugi, Y. et al. The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science; 2008; 319, pp. 64-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1150646]
35. Mattoo, A.K.; Baker, J.E.; Moline, H.E. Induction by copper ions of ethylene production in Spirodela oligorrhiza: Evidence for a pathway independent of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. J. Plant Physiol.; 1986; 123, pp. 193-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(86)80070-0]
36. Reynolds, E.A.; John, P. Evolutionary origin of the ethylene biosynthesis pathway in angiosperms. The Evolution of Plant Physiology; 1st ed. Hemsley, A.R.; Poole, I. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; pp. 121-131.
37. Weingart, H.; Völksch, B.; Ullrich, M.S. Comparison of ethylene production by Pseudomonas syringae and Ralstonia solanacearum. Phytopathology; 1999; 89, pp. 360-365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.5.360] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18944747]
38. Jia, Y.J.; Kakuta, Y.; SUGAwARA, M.; Igarashi, T.; Oki, N.; KisAKi, M.; Shoji, T.; Kanetuna, Y.; Horita, T.; Matsui, H. et al. Synthesis and degradation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by Penicillium citrinum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.; 1999; 63, pp. 542-549. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb.63.542] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10227140]
39. Amagai, A.; Maeda, Y. The ethylene action in the development of cellular slime molds: An analogy to higher plants. Protoplasma; 1992; 167, pp. 159-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01403379]
40. Ott, S.; Krieg, T.; Spanier, U.; Schieleit, P. Phytohormones in lichens with emphasis on ethylene biosynthesis and functional aspects on lichen symbiosis. PHYTON-HORN-; 2000; 40, pp. 83-94.
41. Guzman, P.; Ecker, J.R. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell; 1990; 2, pp. 513-523.
42. Akhtar, M.J.; Arshad, M.; Khalid, A.; Mahmood, M.H. Substrate-dependent biosynthesis of ethylene by rhizosphere soil fungi and its influence on etiolated pea seedlings. Pedobiologia; 2005; 49, pp. 211-219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2004.10.006]
43. Shaharoona, B.; Arshad, M.; Zahir, Z.A.; Khalid, A. Performance of Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2006; 38, pp. 2971-2975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.03.024]
44. Liang, X.; Abel, S.; Keller, J.A.; Shen, N.F.; Theologis, A. The 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1992; 89, pp. 11046-11050. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.22.11046]
45. Lee, H.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Kieber, J.J.; Yoon, G.M. Regulation of the turnover of ACC synthases by phytohormones and heterodimerization in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2017; 91, pp. 491-504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13585]
46. Tsuchisaka, A.; Theologis, A. Heterodimeric interactions among the 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase polypeptides encoded by the Arabidopsis gene family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2004; 101, pp. 2275-2280. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308515101] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14983000]
47. Barry, C.S.; Llop-Tous, M.I.; Grierson, D. The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato. Plant Physiol.; 2000; 123, pp. 979-986. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.123.3.979] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10889246]
48. Nakatsuka, A.; Murachi, S.; Okunishi, H.; Shiomi, S.; Nakano, R.; Kubo, Y.; Inaba, A. Differential expression and internal feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, and ethylene receptor genes in tomato fruit during development and ripening. Plant Physiol.; 1998; 118, pp. 1295-1305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.118.4.1295] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9847103]
49. Li, G.; Meng, X.; Wang, R.; Mao, G.; Han, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Dual-level regulation of ACC synthase activity by MPK3/MPK6 cascade and its downstream WRKY transcription factor during ethylene induction in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet.; 2012; 8, e1002767. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002767] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761583]
50. Joo, S.; Liu, Y.; Lueth, A.; Zhang, S. MAPK phosphorylation-induced stabilization of ACS6 protein is mediated by the non-catalytic C-terminal domain, which also contains the cis-determinant for rapid degradation by the 26S proteasome pathway. Plant J.; 2008; 54, pp. 129-140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03404.x]
51. Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Phosphorylation of ACC synthase by MPK6, a stress-responsive MAPK, induces ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2004; 16, pp. 3386-3399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.026609]
52. Yoshida, H.; Nagata, M.; Saito, K.; Wang, K.L.; Ecker, J.R. Arabidopsis ETO1 specifically interacts with and negatively regulates type 2 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthases. BMC Plant Biol.; 2005; 5, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-5-14]
53. McClellan, C.A.; Chang, C. The role of protein turnover in ethylene biosynthesis and response. Plant Sci.; 2008; 175, pp. 24-31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.01.004]
54. Hansen, M.; Chae, H.S.; Kieber, J.J. Regulation of ACS protein stability by cytokinin and brassinosteroid. Plant J.; 2009; 57, pp. 606-614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03711.x]
55. Wang, K.L.C.; Yoshida, H.; Lurin, C.; Ecker, J.R. Regulation of ethylene gas biosynthesis by the Arabidopsis ETO1 protein. Nature; 2004; 428, pp. 945-950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02516]
56. Lyzenga, W.J.; Stone, S.L. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis through protein degradation. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2012; 7, pp. 1438-1442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.21930] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22990452]
57. Ortega-Martínez, O.; Pernas, M.; Carol, R.J.; Dolan, L. Ethylene modulates stem cell division in the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Science; 2007; 317, pp. 507-510. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1143409]
58. Chae, H.S.; Faure, F.; Kieber, J.J. The eto1, eto2, and eto3 mutations and cytokinin treatment increase ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by increasing the stability of ACS protein. Plant Cell; 2003; 15, pp. 545-559. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.006882] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12566591]
59. Christians, M.J.; Gingerich, D.J.; Hansen, M.; Binder, B.M.; Kieber, J.J.; Vierstra, R.D. The BTB ubiquitin ligases ETO1, EOL1 and EOL2 act collectively to regulate ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by controlling type-2 ACC synthase levels. Plant J.; 2009; 57, pp. 332-345. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03693.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18808454]
60. Prasad, M.E.; Schofield, A.; Lyzenga, W.; Liu, H.; Stone, S.L. Arabidopsis RING E3 ligase XBAT32 regulates lateral root production through its role in ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Physiol.; 2010; 153, pp. 1587-1596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.156976] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21051934]
61. Kukreja, S.; Nandwal, A.; Kumar, N.; Sharma, S.; Unvi, V.; Sharma, P. Plant water status, H2O2 scavenging enzymes, ethylene evolution and membrane integrity of Cicer arietinum roots as affected by salinity. Biol. Plant.; 2005; 49, pp. 305-308. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-5308-4]
62. Peng, J.; Li, Z.; Wen, X.; Li, W.; Shi, H.; Yang, L.; Zhu, H.; Guo, H. Salt-induced stabilization of EIN3/EIL1 confers salinity tolerance by deterring ROS accumulation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet.; 2014; 10, e1004664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004664]
63. Chen, D.; Ma, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, W.; Xia, G.; Wang, M. A wheat aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene, TaACO1, negatively regulates salinity stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep.; 2014; 33, pp. 1815-1827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1659-7]
64. Binder, B.M. Ethylene signaling in plants. J. Biol. Chem.; 2020; 295, pp. 7710-7725. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.010854]
65. Chang, C.; Kwok, S.F.; Bleecker, A.B.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: Similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science; 1993; 262, pp. 539-544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8211181]
66. Sakai, H.; Hua, J.; Chen, Q.G.; Chang, C.; Medrano, L.J.; Bleecker, A.B.; Meyerowitz, E.M. ETR2 is an ETR1-like gene involved in ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1998; 95, pp. 5812-5817. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.10.5812] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9576967]
67. Dong, C.H.; Jang, M.; Scharein, B.; Malach, A.; Rivarola, M.; Liesch, J.; Groth, G.; Hwang, I.; Chang, C. Molecular association of the Arabidopsis ETR1 ethylene receptor and a regulator of ethylene signaling, RTE1. J. Biol. Chem.; 2010; 285, pp. 40706-40713. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.146605] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20952388]
68. Chen, Y.F.; Randlett, M.D.; Findell, J.L.; Schaller, G.E. Localization of the ethylene receptor ETR1 to the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem.; 2002; 277, pp. 19861-19866. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201286200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11916973]
69. Ma, B.; Cui, M.L.; Sun, H.J.; Takada, K.; Mori, H.; Kamada, H.; Ezura, H. Subcellular localization and membrane topology of the melon ethylene receptor CmERS1. Plant Physiol.; 2006; 141, pp. 587-597. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.080523]
70. Guo, H.; Ecker, J.R. The ethylene signaling pathway: New insights. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.; 2004; 7, pp. 40-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.011]
71. Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Hutchison, C.E.; Laskey, J.; Kieber, J.J. Biochemical and functional analysis of CTR1, a protein kinase that negatively regulates ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2003; 33, pp. 221-233. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01620.x]
72. Li, W.; Ma, M.; Feng, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, M.; An, F.; Guo, H. EIN2-Directed Translational Regulation of Ethylene Signaling in Arabidopsis. Cell; 2015; 163, pp. 670-683. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.037]
73. Merchante, C.; Brumos, J.; Yun, J.; Hu, Q.; Spencer, K.R.; Enríquez, P.; Binder, B.M.; Heber, S.; Stepanova, A.N.; Alonso, J.M. Gene-Specific Translation Regulation Mediated by the Hormone-Signaling Molecule EIN2. Cell; 2015; 163, pp. 684-697. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.036]
74. Dolgikh, V.A.; Pukhovaya, E.M.; Zemlyanskaya, E.V. Shaping ethylene response: The role of EIN3/EIL1 transcription factors. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 1030. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01030]
75. Debbarma, J.; Sarki, Y.N.; Saikia, B.; Boruah, H.P.D.; Singha, D.L.; Chikkaputtaiah, C. Ethylene response factor (ERF) family proteins in abiotic stresses and CRISPR-CAS9 genome editing of ERFs for multiple abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants: A review. Mol. Biotechnol.; 2019; 61, pp. 153-172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12033-018-0144-x]
76. Li, Y.; Zhu, B.; Xu, W.; Zhu, H.; Chen, A.; Xie, Y.; Shao, Y.; Luo, Y. LeERF1 positively modulated ethylene triple response on etiolated seedling, plant development and fruit ripening and softening in tomato. Plant Cell Rep.; 2007; 26, pp. 1999-2008. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0394-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17639404]
77. Zhang, F.; Qi, B.; Wang, L.; Zhao, B.; Rode, S.; Riggan, N.D.; Ecker, J.R.; Qiao, H. EIN2-dependent regulation of acetylation of histone H3K14 and non-canonical histone H3K23 in ethylene signalling. Nat. Commun.; 2016; 7, 13018. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27694846]
78. Zhang, F.; Wang, L.; Qi, B.; Zhao, B.; Ko, E.E.; Riggan, N.D.; Chin, K.; Qiao, H. EIN2 mediates direct regulation of histone acetylation in the ethylene response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2017; 114, pp. 10274-10279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707937114] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874528]
79. Clark, K.L.; Larsen, P.B.; Wang, X.; Chang, C. Association of the Arabidopsis CTR1 Raf-like kinase with the ETR1 and ERS ethylene receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1998; 95, pp. 5401-5406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.9.5401] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9560288]
80. Testerink, C.; Larsen, P.B.; Van Der Does, D.; Van Himbergen, J.A.; Munnik, T. Phosphatidic acid binds to and inhibits the activity of Arabidopsis CTR1. J. Exp. Bot.; 2007; 58, pp. 3905-3914. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm243] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18000017]
81. Antunes, M.D.C.; Sfakiotakis, E.M. Effect of high temperature stress on ethylene biosynthesis, respiration and ripening of ‘Hayward’kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol.; 2000; 20, pp. 251-259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00136-8]
82. Biggs, M.S.; Woodson, W.R.; Woodson, A.K. Biochemical basis of high-temperature inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis in ripening tomato fruits. Physiol. Planta; 1998; 72, pp. 572-578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09167.x]
83. Xia, X.J.; Zhou, Y.H.; Shi, K.; Zhou, J.; Foyer, C.H.; Yu, J.Q. Interplay between reactive oxygen species and hormones in the control of plant development and stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot.; 2015; 66, pp. 2839-2856. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv089]
84. Valluru, R.; Reynolds, M.P.; Davies, W.J.; Sukumaran, S. Phenotypic and genome-wide association analysis of spike ethylene in diverse wheat genotypes under heat stress. New Phytol.; 2017; 214, pp. 271-283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14367]
85. Hu, Q.; Ding, F.; Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Huang, B. Strigolactone and ethylene inhibitor suppressing dark-induced leaf senescence in perennial ryegrass involving transcriptional downregulation of chlorophyll degradation. J. Am. Soci. Hortic. Sci.; 2021; 146, pp. 79-86. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04933-20]
86. Savada, R.P.; Ozga, J.A.; Jayasinghege, C.P.; Waduthanthri, K.D.; Reinecke, D.M. Heat stress differentially modifies ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in pea floral and fruit tissues. Plant Mol. Biol.; 2017; 95, pp. 313-331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-017-0653-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861701]
87. Larkindale, J.; Huang, B. Effects of abscisic acid, salicylic acid, ethylene and hydrogen peroxide in thermotolerance and recovery for creeping bentgrass. Plant Growth Regul.; 2005; 47, pp. 17-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-005-1536-z]
88. Poór, P.; Nawaz, K.; Gupta, R.; Ashfaque, F.; Khan, M.I. Ethylene involvement in the regulation of heat stress tolerance in plants. Plant Rep.; 2021; 13, pp. 1-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02675-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33713206]
89. Keunen, E.; Schellingen, K.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. Ethylene and metal stress: Small molecule, big impact. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 7, 23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26870052]
90. Khan, N.A.; Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Masood, A.; Fatma, M.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene potentiates sulfur-mediated reversal of cadmium inhibited photosynthetic responses in mustard. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 7, 1628. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01628] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853462]
91. Schellingen, K.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Remans, T.; Vangronsveld, J.; Keunen, E.; Cuypers, A. Ethylene signalling is mediating the early cadmium-induced oxidative challenge in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci.; 2015; 239, pp. 137-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.07.015]
92. Kim, Y.S.; Choi, D.; Lee, M.M.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, W.T. Biotic and abiotic stress-related expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylate oxidase gene family in Nicotiana glutinosa L. Plant Cell Physiol.; 1998; 39, pp. 565-573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029406]
93. Albacete, A.; Martínez-Andújar, C.; Ghanem, M.E.; Acosta, M.; Sánchez-Bravo, J.; Asins, M.J.; Cuartero, J.; Lutts, S.; Dodd, I.C.; Pérez-Alfocea, F. Rootstock-mediated changes in xylem ionic and hormonal status are correlated with delayed leaf senescence, and increased leaf area and crop productivity in salinized tomato. Plant Cell Environ.; 2009; 32, pp. 928-938. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01973.x]
94. Zapata, P.J.; Botella, M.N.; Pretel, M.T.; Serrano, M. Responses of ethylene biosynthesis to saline stress in seedlings of eight plant species. Plant Growth Regul.; 2007; 53, pp. 97-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-007-9207-x]
95. Siddikee, M.D.; Chauhan, P.S.; Sa, T. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis under salt stress in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2012; 31, pp. 265-272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-011-9236-6]
96. Du, H.; Wu, N.; Cui, F.; You, L.; Li, X.; Xiong, L. A homolog of ETHYLENE OVERPRODUCER, OsETOL 1, differentially modulates drought and submergence tolerance in rice. Plant J.; 2014; 78, pp. 834-849. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12508] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24641694]
97. Yu, Y.; Yang, D.; Zhou, S.; Gu, J.; Wang, F.; Dong, J.; Huang, R. The ethylene response factor OsERF109 negatively affects ethylene biosynthesis and drought tolerance in rice. Protoplasma; 2017; 254, pp. 401-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-0960-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27040682]
98. Apelbaum, A.; Yang, S.F. Biosynthesis of stress ethylene induced by water deficit. Plant Physiol.; 1981; 68, pp. 594-596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.68.3.594] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16661963]
99. Benlloch-González, M.; Romera, J.; Cristescu, S.; Harren, F.; Fournier, J.M.; Benlloch, M. K+ starvation inhibits water-stress-induced stomatal closure via ethylene synthesis in sunflower plants. J. Exp. Bot.; 2010; 61, pp. 1139-1145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp379] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20054030]
100. Tanaka, Y.; Sano, T.; Tamaoki, M.; Nakajima, N.; Kondo, N.; Hasezawa, S. Ethylene inhibits abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.; 2005; 138, pp. 2337-2343. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.063503] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16024687]
101. Khan, M.I.R.; Trivellini, A.; Chhillar, H.; Chopra, P.; Ferrante, A.; Khan, N.A.; Ismail, A.M. The significance and functions of ethylene in flooding stress tolerance in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2020; 179, 104188. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104188]
102. Shiu, O.Y.; Oetiker, J.H.; Yip, W.K.; Yang, S.F. The promoter of LE-ACS7, an early flooding-induced 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene of the tomato, is tagged by a Sol3 transposon. Proceed. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1998; 95, pp. 10334-10339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.10334]
103. Grichko, V.P.; Glick, B.R. Amelioration of flooding stress by ACC deaminase-containing plant growth promoting bacteria. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2001; 39, pp. 11-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(00)01212-2]
104. Yamauchi, T.; Yoshioka, M.; Fukazawa, A.; Mori, H.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Tsutsumi, N.; Yoshioka, H.; Nakazono, M. An NADPH oxidase RBOH functions in rice roots during lysigenous aerenchyma formation under oxygen-deficient conditions. Plant Cell; 2017; 29, pp. 775-790. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00976]
105. Bailey-Serres, J.; Fukao, T.; Ronald, P.; Ismail, A.; Heuer, S.; Mackill, D. Submergence tolerant rice: SUB1’s journey from landrace to modern cultivar. Rice; 2010; 3, pp. 138-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12284-010-9048-5]
106. Pierik, R.; Sasidharan, R.; Voesenek, L.A.C.J. Growth Control by Ethylene: Adjusting Phenotypes to the Environment. J. Plant. Growth Regul.; 2007; 26, pp. 188-200. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-006-0124-4]
107. Takács, Z.; Poór, P.; Borbély, P.; Czékus, Z.; Szalai, G.; Tari, I. H2O2 homeostasis in wild-type and ethylene-insensitive Never ripe tomato in response to salicylic acid treatment in normal photoperiod and in prolonged darkness. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2018; 126, pp. 74-85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.026] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505970]
108. Müller, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Ethylene response factors: A key regulatory hub in hormone and stress signaling. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 169, pp. 32-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00677]
109. Jespersen, D.; Yu, J.; Huang, B. Metabolite responses to exogenous application of nitrogen, cytokinin, and ethylene inhibitors in relation to heat-induced senescence in creeping bentgrass. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0123744.
110. Nazar, R.; Umar, S.; Khan, N.A.; Sareer, O. Salicylic acid supplementation improves photosynthesis and growth in mustard through changes in proline accumulation and ethylene formation under drought stress. S. Afr. J. Bot.; 2015; 98, pp. 84-94. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.02.005]
111. Cheng, M.C.; Liao, P.M.; Kuo, W.W.; Lin, T.P. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol.; 2013; 162, pp. 1566-1582. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.221911]
112. Wu, Y.S.; Yang, C.Y. Ethylene-mediated signaling confers thermotolerance and regulates transcript levels of heat shock factors in rice seedlings under heat stress. Bot. Stud.; 2019; 60, pp. 1-23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40529-019-0272-z]
113. Xu, C.; Xia, Z.; Huang, Z.; Xia, C.; Huang, J.; Zha, M.; Wang, S.; Imran, M.; Casteel, S.; Jiang, Y. et al. Understanding the physiological and transcriptional mechanism of reproductive stage soybean in response to heat stress. Crop Breed. Gen. Genom.; 2019; 2, e200004.
114. Frank, G.; Pressman, E.; Ophir, R.; Althan, L.; Shaked, R.; Freedman, M.; Shen, S.; Firon, N. Transcriptional profiling of maturing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) microspores reveals the involvement of heat shock proteins, ROS scavengers, hormones, and sugars in the heat stress response. J. Exp. Bot.; 2009; 60, pp. 3891-3908. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp234]
115. Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.C.; Huang, R. Transcriptional modulation of ethylene response factor protein JERF3 in the oxidative stress response enhances tolerance of tobacco seedlings to salt, drought, and freezing. Plant Physiol.; 2008; 148, pp. 1953-1963. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.126813]
116. Pan, C.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Q.; Fan, F.; Fu, R.; Ahammed, G.J.; Yu, J.; Shi, K. Role of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in elevated CO2 -induced heat stress response in tomato. Planta; 2019; 250, pp. 563-572. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03192-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123806]
117. Larkindale, J.; Hall, J.D.; Knight, M.R.; Vierling, E. Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiol.; 2005; 138, pp. 882-897. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.062257] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15923322]
118. Jegadeesan, S.; Chaturvedi, P.; Ghatak, A.; Pressman, E.; Meir, S.; Faigenboim, A.; Rutley, N.; Beery, A.; Hare, A.; Weckwerth, W. et al. Proteomics of heat-stress and ethylene-mediated thermotolerance mechanisms in tomato pollen grains. Front. Plant Sci.; 2018; 9, 1558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01558] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483278]
119. Xu, Y.; Huang, B. Effects of foliar-applied ethylene inhibitor and synthetic cytokinin on creeping bentgrass to enhance heat tolerance. Crop Sci.; 2009; 49, pp. 1876-1884. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0441]
120. Arteca, R.N.; Arteca, J.M. Heavy-metal-induced ethylene production in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol.; 2007; 164, pp. 1480-1488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.09.006]
121. Khan, M.I.R.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene reverses photosynthetic inhibition by nickel and zinc in mustard through changes in PS II activity, photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency, and antioxidant metabolism. Protoplasma; 2014; 251, pp. 1007-1019. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0610-7]
122. Thao, N.P.; Khan, M.I.R.; Thu, N.B.A.; Hoang, X.L.T.; Asgher, M.; Khan, N.A.; Tran, L.S.P. Role of ethylene and its cross talk with other signaling molecules in plant responses to heavy metal stress. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 169, pp. 73-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00663]
123. Wang, Y.; Yuan, M.; Li, Z.; Niu, Y.; Jin, Q.; Zhu, B.; Xu, Y. Effects of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling on oxidative stress and antioxidant defense system in Nelumbo nucifera G. under cadmium exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.; 2020; 27, pp. 40156-40170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09918-3]
124. Steffens, B. The role of ethylene and ROS in salinity, heavy metal, and flooding responses in rice. Front. Plant Sci.; 2014; 5, 685. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00685]
125. Asgher, M.; Khan, N.A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Fatma, M.; Masood, A. Ethylene production is associated with alleviation of cadmium-induced oxidative stress by sulfur in mustard types differing in ethylene sensitivity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2014; 106, pp. 54-61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.017]
126. Singh, N.; Gaddam, S.R.; Singh, D.; Trivedi, P.K. Regulation of arsenic stress response by ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2021; 185, 104408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104408]
127. Schlagnhaufer, C.D.; Arteca, R.N.; Pell, E.J. Sequential expression of two 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase genes in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leaves. Plant Mol. Biol.; 1997; 35, pp. 683-688. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005857717196] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9426590]
128. Cao, S.; Chen, Z.; Liu, G.; Jiang, L.; Yuan, H.; Ren, G.; Bian, X.; Jian, H.; Ma, X. The Arabidopsis Ethylene-Insensitive 2 gene is required for lead resistance. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2009; 47, pp. 308-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.12.013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19153049]
129. Wilson, R.L.; Kim, H.; Bakshi, A.; Binder, B.M. The ethylene receptors ETHYLENE RESPONSE1 and ETHYLENE RESPONSE2 have contrasting roles in seed germination of Arabidopsis during salt stress. Plant Physiol.; 2014; 165, pp. 1353-1366. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.241695]
130. Alvarez, I.; Tomaro, M.L.; Benavides, M.P. Changes in polyamines, proline and ethylene in sunflower calluses treated with NaCl. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.; 2003; 74, pp. 51-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023302012208]
131. Cramer, G.R. Kinetics of maize leaf elongation: III. Silver thiosulfate increases the yield threshold of salt-stressed plants, but ethylene is not involved. Plant Physiol.; 1992; 100, pp. 1044-1047. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.2.1044]
132. Petruzzelli, L.; Coraggio, I.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Ethylene promotes ethylene biosynthesis during pea seed germination by positive feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclo-propane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase. Planta; 2000; 211, pp. 144-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004250000274]
133. Vaseva, I.I.; Mishev, K.; Depaepe, T.; Vassileva, V.; Van Der Straeten, D. The diverse salt-stress response of Arabidopsis CTR1-1 and EIN2-1 ethylene signaling mutants is linked to altered root auxin homeostasis. Plants; 2021; 10, 452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10030452]
134. Cao, W.H.; Liu, J.; He, X.J.; Mu, R.L.; Zhou, H.L.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. Modulation of ethylene responses affects plant salt-stress responses. Plant Physiol.; 2007; 143, pp. 707-719. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.094292]
135. Lin, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Shang, J.X.; Zhao, L. OsWAK112, A Wall-Associated Kinase, Negatively Regulates Salt Stress Responses by Inhibiting Ethylene Production. Front. Plant Sci.; 2021; 12, 751965. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.751965]
136. Tao, J.J.; Chen, H.W.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. The role of ethylene in plants under salinity stress. Front. Plant Sci.; 2015; 6, 1059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01059] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26640476]
137. Liang, S.; Xiong, W.; Yin, C.; Xie, X.; Jin, Y.J.; Zhang, S.; Yang, B.; Ye, G.; Chen, S.; Luan, W.J. Overexpression of OsARD1 improves submergence, drought, and salt tolerances of seedling through the enhancement of ethylene synthesis in rice. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 1088. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01088] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31552078]
138. Cao, Y.R.; Chen, H.W.; Li, Z.G.; Tao, J.J.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. Tobacco ankyrin protein NEIP2 interacts with ethylene receptor NTHK1 and regulates plant growth and stress responses. Plant Cell Physiol.; 2015; 56, pp. 803-818. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634961]
139. Zhao, H.; Duan, K.X.; Ma, B.; Yin, C.C.; Hu, Y.; Tao, J.J.; Huang, Y.H.; Cao, W.Q.; Chen, H.; Yang, C. et al. Histidine kinase MHZ1/OsHK1 interacts with ethylene receptors to regulate root growth in rice. Nat. Commun.; 2020; 11, 518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14313-0]
140. Ge, X.M.; Cai, H.L.; Lei, X.; Zhou, X.; Yue, M.; He, J.M. Heterotrimeric G protein mediates ethylene-induced stomatal closure via hydrogen peroxide synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2015; 82, pp. 138-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12799]
141. Cebrián, G.; Iglesias-Moya, J.; García, A.; Martínez, J.; Romero, J.; Regalado, J.J.; Martínez, C.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Jamilena, M. Involvement of ethylene receptors in the salt tolerance response of Cucurbita pepo. Hortic. Res.; 2021; 8, 73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00508-z]
142. Arraes, F.B.M.; Beneventi, M.A.; Lisei de Sa, M.E.; Paixao, J.F.R.; Albuquerque, E.V.S.; Marin, S.R.R.; Purgatto, E.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Grossi-de-Sa, M.F. Implications of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in soybean drought stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol.; 2015; 15, pp. 1-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0597-z]
143. Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. Open or close the gate–stomata action under the control of phytohormones in drought stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci.; 2013; 4, 138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00138]
144. Aeong, O.S.; Park, J.H.; In Lee, G.; Hee Paek, K.; Ki Park, S.; Gil Nam, H. Identification of three genetic loci controlling leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.; 1997; 12, pp. 527-535. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.00489.x]
145. Nath, P.; Trivedi, P.K.; Sane, V.A.; Sane, A.P. Role of ethylene in fruit ripening. Ethylene Action in Plants; Khan, N. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 151-184.
146. Wilmowicz, E.K.J.; Kopcewicz, J. Ethylene and ABA interactions in the regulation of flower induction in Pharbitis nil. J. Plant Physiol.; 2008; 165, pp. 1917-1928. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.04.009]
147. Ni, X.L.; Gui, M.Y.; Tan, L.L.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, W.Z.; Li, C.X. Programmed Cell Death and Aerenchyma Formation in Water-Logged Sunflower Stems and Its Promotion by Ethylene and ROS. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 9, 1928. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01928] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687344]
148. Tavladoraki, P.; Cona, A.; Federico, R.; Tempera, G.; Viceconte, N.; Saccoccio, S.; Battaglia, V.; Toninello, A.; Agostinelli, E. Polyamine catabolism: Target for antiproliferative therapies in animals and stress tolerance strategies in plants. Amino Acids; 2012; 42, pp. 411-426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00726-011-1012-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21874532]
149. Yang, C.; Ma, B.; He, S.J.; Xiong, Q.; Duan, K.X.; Yin, C.C.; Chen, H.; Lu, X.; Chen, S.H.; Zhang, J.H. MAOHUZI6/ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE1 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE2 regulate ethylene response of roots and coleoptiles and negatively affect salinity tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 169, pp. 148-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00353] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995326]
150. Sajid, H.; Chu, Z.; Zhigang, B.; Xiaochuang, C.; Lianfeng, Z.; Azhar, H.; Zhu, C.; Fahad, S.; James, A.B.; Zhang, J. Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene on rice growth characteristics and superior and inferior spikelet development under salinity stress. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2018; 37, pp. 1368-1384.
151. Hussain, S.; Bai, Z.; Huang, J.; Cao, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, J. 1-methylcyclopropene modulates physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant responses of rice to different salinity stress levels. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00124]
152. Banga, M.; Slaa, E.J.; Blom, C.W.; Voesenek, L.A. Ethylene biosynthesis and accumulation under drained and submerged conditions (a comparative study of two Rumex species). Plant Physiol.; 1996; 112, pp. 229-237. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.1.229]
153. Voesenek, L.A.C.J.; Sasidharan, R. Ethylene–and oxygen signalling–drive plant survival during flooding. Plant Biol.; 2013; 15, pp. 426-435. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.12014]
154. Huang, Y.C.; Yeh, T.H.; Yang, C.Y. Ethylene signaling involves in seeds germination upon submergence and antioxidant response elicited confers submergence tolerance to rice seedlings. Rice; 2019; 12, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12284-019-0284-z]
155. Cao, J.J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Z.L. Growth response of the submerged macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum to sediment nutrient levels and water-level fluctuations. Aquatic Biol.; 2012; 17, pp. 295-303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ab00484]
156. Hattori, Y.; Nagai, K.; Furukawa, S.; Song, X.J.; Kawano, R.; Sakakibara, H.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Yoshimura, A.; Kitano, H. et al. The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water. Nature; 2009; 460, pp. 1026-1030. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08258]
157. Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci.; 2015; 20, pp. 219-229. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.001]
158. Mao, C.; Wang, S.; Jia, Q.; Wu, P. OsEIL1, a rice homolog of the Arabidopsis EIN3 regulates the ethylene response as a positive component. Plant Mol. Biol.; 2006; 61, pp. 141-152. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-6184-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16786297]
159. Watanabe, H.; Saigusa, M.; Hase, S.; Hayakawa, T.; Satoh, S. Cloning of a cDNA encoding an ETR2-like protein (Os-ERL1) from deep water rice (Oryza sativa L.) and increase in its mRNA level by submergence, ethylene, and gibberellin treatments. J. Exp. Bot.; 2004; 55, pp. 1145-1148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh110] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020633]
160. Wuriyanghan, H.; Zhang, B.; Cao, W.H.; Ma, B.; Lei, G.; Liu, Y.F.; Wei, W.; Wu, H.J.; Chen, L.J.; Chen, H.W. et al. The ethylene receptor ETR2 delays floral transition and affects starch accumulation in rice. Plant Cell; 2009; 21, pp. 1473-1494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.065391] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19417056]
161. Wakeel, A.; Ali, I.; Wu, M.; Khan, A.R.A.; Jan, M.; Ali, A.; Liu, Y.; Ge, S.; Wu, J.; Liu, B. et al. Ethylene mediates dichromate-induced oxidative stress and regulation of the enzymatic antioxidant system-related transcriptome in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2019; 161, pp. 166-179.
162. Abozeid, A.; Ying, Z.; Lin, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, Z. Ethylene improves root system development under cadmium stress by modulating superoxide anion concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci.; 2017; 8, 253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00253]
163. Wang, H.; Liang, X.; Huang, J.; Zhang, D.; Lu, H.; Liu, Z.; Bi, Y. Involvement of ethylene and hydrogen peroxide in induction of alternative respiratory pathway in salt-treated Arabidopsis calluses. Plant Cell Physiol.; 2010; 51, pp. 1754-1765. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq134]
164. Bialecka, B.; Kepczynski, J. Effect of ethephon and gibberellin A3 on Amaranthus caudatus seed germination and alpha- and beta-amylase activity under salinity stress. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot.; 2009; 51, pp. 119-125.
165. Sehar, Z.; Iqbal, N.; Khan, M.I.R.; Masood, A.; Rehman, M.T.; Hussain, A.; AlAjmi, M.F.; Ahmad, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene reduces glucose sensitivity and reverses photosynthetic repression through optimization of glutathione production in salt-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 12650. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92086-2]
166. Cui, M.; Lin, Y.; Zu, Y.; Efferth, T.; Li, D.; Tang, Z. Ethylene increases accumulation of compatible solutes and decreases oxidative stress to improve plant tolerance to water stress in Arabidopsis J. Plant Biol.; 2015; 58, pp. 193-201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12374-014-0302-z]
167. Sun, X.; Zhao, T.; Gan, S.; Ren, X.; Fang, L.; Karungo, S.K.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Xin, H. Ethylene positively regulates cold tolerance in grapevine by modulating the expression of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 057. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 24066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep24066] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27039848]
168. Vaseva, I.I.; Qudeimat, E.; Potuschak, T.; Du, Y.; Genschik, P.; Vandenbussche, F.; Van Der Straetenet, D. The plant hormone ethylene restricts Arabidopsis growth via the epidermis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2018; 115, pp. E4130-E4139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717649115] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29643073]
169. Chang, C. Q&A: How do plants respond to ethylene, and what is its importance?. BMC Biol.; 2016; 14, pp. 1-7.
170. Ubeda-Tomás, S.; Beemster, G.T.; Bennett, M.J. Hormonal regulation of root growth: Integrating local activities into global behaviour. Trends Plant Sci.; 2012; 17, pp. 326-331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.002]
171. Dubois, M.; Van den Broeck, L.; Claeys, H.; Van Vlierberghe, K.; Matsui, M.; Inzé, D. The ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTORs ERF6 and ERF11 antagonistically regulate mannitol-induced growth inhibition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 169, pp. 166-179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00335]
172. Khan, N.A. The influence of exogenous ethylene on growth and photosynthesis of mustard (Brassica juncea) following defoliation. Sci. Hortic.; 2005; 105, pp. 499-505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.004]
173. Fiorani, F.; Bögemann, G.M.; Visser, E.; Lambers, H.; Voesenek, L.A.C.J. Ethylene emission, and responsiveness to applied ethylene vary among Poa species that inherently differ in elongation rates Plant Physiol. 2012, 129, 1382–1390.
174. Wilkinson, S.; Davies, W.J. Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: New insights from cell to plant to the community. Plant Cell Environ.; 2010; 33, pp. 510-525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02052.x]
175. Tsai, K.J.; Chou, S.J.; Shih, M.C. Ethylene plays an essential role in the recovery of Arabidopsis during post-anaerobiosis reoxygenation. Plant Cell Environ.; 2014; 37, pp. 2391-2405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12292]
176. Rasheed, F.; Sehar, Z.; Fatma, M.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Involvement of ethylene in reversal of salt stress by salicylic acid in the presence of sulfur in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2021; 40, pp. 1-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10526-9]
177. Akula, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal Behav.; 2011; 6, pp. 1720-1731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.11.17613]
178. Chen, Q.; Wu, K.; Tang, Z.; Guo, Q.; Guo, X.; Wang, H. Exogenous ethylene enhanced the cadmium resistance and changed the alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plantar.; 2017; 39, pp. 1-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2567-6]
179. Papon, N.; Bremer, J.; Vansiri, A.; Andreu, F.; Rideau, M.; Crèche, J. Cytokinin and ethylene control indole alkaloid production at the level of the MEP/terpenoid pathway in Catharanthus roseus suspension cells. Planta Med.; 2005; 71, pp. 572-574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-864163] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15971133]
180. Liu, J.J.; Williams, H.; Li, X.R.; Schoettle, A.W.; Sniezko, R.A.; Murray, M.; Chen, H. Profiling methyl jasmonate-responsive transcriptome for understanding induced systemic resistance in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). Plant Mol. Biol.; 2017; 95, pp. 359-374. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-017-0655-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28861810]
181. Sui, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, Z.; Gao, Y.; Li, W.; Li, M.; Wang, B. Ethylene response factor NtERF91 positively regulates alkaloid accumulations in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2019; 517, pp. 164-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.07.037] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31326115]
182. Yadav, B.; Jogawat, A.; Rahman, M.S.; Narayan, O.P. Secondary metabolites in the drought stress tolerance of crop plants: A review. Gene Rep.; 2021; 23, 101040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101040]
183. Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Kumar, R.; Kohli, S.K.; Yadav, P.; Kapoor, D.; Bali, A.S.; Shahzad, B.; Khanna, K. et al. Abiotic stress management in plants: Role of ethylene. Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology; Roychoudhury, A.; Tripathi, D. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 185-208.
184. Khan, N.; Ali, S.; Zandi, P.; Mehmood, A.; Ullah, S.; Ikram, M.; Ismail, M.A.S.; Babar, M.A. Role of sugars, amino acids and organic acids in improving plant abiotic stress tolerance. Pak. J. Bot.; 2020; 52, pp. 355-363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30848/PJB2020-2(24)]
185. Iqbal, N.; Umar, S.; Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A. Ethephon increases photosynthetic-nitrogen use efficiency, proline and antioxidant metabolism to alleviate decrease in photosynthesis under salinity stress in mustard. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2017; 12, e1297000. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2017.1297000]
186. Rosa, M.; Prado, C.; Podazza, G.; Interdonato, R.; González, J.A.; Hilal, M.; Prado, F.E. Soluble sugars: Metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress: A complex network in the life of plants. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2009; 4, pp. 388-393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.5.8294]
187. Dai, H.; Fu, M.; Yang, X.; Chen, Q. Ethylene inhibited sprouting of potato tubers by influencing the carbohydrate metabolism pathway. J. Food Sci. Technol.; 2016; 53, pp. 3166-3174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2290-0]
188. Kępczyńska, E.; Zielińska, S. The role of endogenous ethylene in carbohydrate metabolism of Medicago sativa L. somatic embryos in relation to their regenerative ability. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2013; 32, pp. 191-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-012-9288-2]
189. Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Feng, F.; Yang, Z.; Ye, C. Effects of ethylene on carbohydrate metabolism and enzyme activities in postharvest ripening jackfruit. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis; 2017; 39, pp. 43-49.
190. Ottow, E.A.; Brinker, M.; Teichmann, T.; Fritz, E.; Kaiser, W.; Brosché, M.; Kangasjärvi, J.; Jiang, X.; Polle, A. Populus euphratica displays apoplastic sodium accumulation, osmotic adjustment by decreases in calcium and soluble carbohydrates, and develops leaf succulence under salt stress. Plant Physiol.; 2005; 139, pp. 1762-1772. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.069971] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16299175]
191. Alves, L.R.; Dos Reis, A.R.; Prado, E.R.; Lavres, J.; Pompeu, G.B.; Azevedo, R.A.; Gratão, P.L. New insights into cadmium stressful-conditions: Role of ethylene on selenium-mediated antioxidant enzymes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.; 2019; 186, 109747. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109747] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31634660]
192. Petrulova, V.; Vilkova, M.; Kovalikova, Z.; Sajko, M.; Repcak, M. Ethylene Induction of Non-Enzymatic Metabolic Antioxidants in Matricaria chamomilla. Molecules; 2020; 25, 5720. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235720] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287420]
193. Pál, M.; Janda, T.; Szalai, G. Interactions between plant hormones and thiol-related heavy metal chelators. Plant Growth Regul.; 2018; 85, pp. 173-185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-018-0391-7]
194. Maksymiec, W. Effects of jasmonate and some other signalling factors on bean and onion growth during the initial phase of cadmium action. Biol. Planta; 2011; 55, pp. 112-118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-011-0015-9]
195. Di Toppi, L.S.; Gabbrielli, R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 1999; 41, pp. 105-130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00058-6]
196. Jung, J.Y.; Shin, R.; Schachtman, D.P. Ethylene mediates response and tolerance to potassium deprivation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2009; 21, pp. 607-621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.063099]
197. Lau, O.L.; Yang, S.F. Stimulation of ethylene production in the mung bean hypocotyls by cupric ion, calcium ion, and kinetin. Plant Physiol.; 1976; 57, pp. 88-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.57.1.88]
198. Yu, J.; Niu, L.; Yu, J.; Liao, W.; Xie, J.; Lv, J.; Feng, Z.; Hu, L.; Dawuda, M.M. The involvement of ethylene in calcium-induced adventitious root formation in cucumber under salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 1047. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051047]
199. Song, L.; Liu, D. Ethylene and plant responses to phosphate deficiency. Front. Plant Sci.; 2015; 6, 796. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00796] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26483813]
200. González-Fontes, A.; Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; Martín-Rejano, E.M.; Navarro-Gochicoa, M.T.; Rexach, J.; Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J. Root responses to boron deficiency mediated by ethylene. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 6, 1103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01103] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26779202]
201. De Gernier, H.; De Pessemier, J.; Xu, J.; Cristescu, S.M.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Verbruggen, N.; Hermans, C. A comparative study of ethylene emanation upon nitrogen deficiency in natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 7, 70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00070] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904047]
202. Schachtman, D.P. The role of ethylene in plant responses to k+ deficiency. Front. Plant Sci.; 2015; 6, 1153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01153]
203. García, M.J.; Romera, F.J.; Lucena, C.; Alcántara, E.; Pérez-Vicente, R. Ethylene and the regulation of physiological and morphological responses to nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol.; 2015; 169, pp. 51-60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00708]
204. Qin, H.; He, L.; Huang, R. The coordination of ethylene and other hormones in primary root development. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 874. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00874]
205. Koevoets, I.T.; Venema, J.H.; Elzenga, J.T.M.; Testerink, C. Roots Withstanding their Environment: Exploiting Root System Architecture Responses to Abiotic Stress to Improve Crop Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 7, 1335. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01335]
206. Sun, P.; Tian, Q.-Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, W.-H. Aluminium-induced inhibition of root elongation in Arabidopsis is mediated by ethylene and auxin. J. Exp. Bot.; 2009; 61, pp. 347-356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp306]
207. Mathieu, A.S.; Dobrev, P.I.; Tarkowská, D.; Pospíšil, J.; Motyka, V.; Jacquemin, G.; Lutts, S. Phytohormone profile and CiFL1 expression in young seedlings of Cichorium intybus L. var sativum exposed to high temperature in relation to vernalization and de-vernalization processes. Environ. Exp. Bot.; 2020; 178, 104127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104127]
208. Pistelli, L.; Tonelli, M.; Pellegrini, E.; Cotrozzi, L.; Pucciariello, C.; Trivellini, A.; Nali, C. Accumulation of rosmarinic acid and behaviour of ROS processing systems in Melissa officinalis L. under heat stress. Ind. Crops Prod.; 2019; 138, 111469. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111469]
209. Prerostova, S.; Dobrev, P.I.; Kramna, B.; Gaudinova, A.; Knirsch, V.; Spichal, L.; Vankova, R. Heat acclimation and inhibition of cytokinin degradation positively affect heat stress tolerance of Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci.; 2020; 11, 87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00087] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133021]
210. Yang, Z.; Liu, G.; Liu, J.; Zhang, B.; Meng, W.; Müller, B.; Hayashi, K.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.; De Smet, I. et al. Synergistic action of auxin and cytokinin mediates aluminum-Induced root growth inhibition in Arabidopsis. EMBO Rep.; 2017; 18, pp. 1213-1230. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643806] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28600354]
211. Shi, Y.; Tian, S.; Hou, L.; Huang, X.; Zhang, X.; Guo, H.; Yang, S. Ethylene signaling negatively regulates freezing tolerance by repressing expression of CBF and type-A ARR genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2012; 24, pp. 2578-2595. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.098640] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22706288]
212. Dong, H.; Zhen, Z.; Peng, J.; Chang, L.; Gong, Q.; Wang, N.N. Loss of ACS7 confers abiotic stress tolerance by modulating ABA sensitivity and accumulation in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.; 2011; 62, pp. 4875-4887. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err143]
213. Müller, M. Foes or friends: ABA and ethylene interaction under abiotic stress. Plants; 2021; 10, 448. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10030448]
214. Krishna, P. Brassinosteroid-mediated stress responses. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2003; 22, pp. 289-297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0058-z]
215. Wei, L.J.; Deng, X.G.; Zhu, T.; Zheng, T.; Li, P.X.; Wu, J.Q.; Zhang, D.W.; Lin, H.H. Ethylene is involved in brassinosteroids induced alternative respiratory pathway in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings response to abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci.; 2015; 6, 982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00982]
216. Wang, B.; Zhang, J.; Xia, X.; Zhang, W.H. Ameliorative effect of brassinosteroid and ethylene on germination of cucumber seeds in the presence of sodium chloride. Plant Growth Regul.; 2011; 65, pp. 407-413. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10725-011-9595-9]
217. Zhu, T.; Deng, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, L.; Zou, L.; Li, P.; Zhang, D.; Lin, H. Ethylene and hydrogen peroxide are involved in brassinosteroid-induced salt tolerance in tomato. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 35392. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35392]
218. Liu, M.; Liu, X.X.; He, X.L.; Liu, L.J.; Wu, H.; Tang, C.X.; Zhang, Y.S.; Jin, C.W. Ethylene and nitric oxide interact to regulate the magnesium deficiency-induced root hair development in Arabidopsis. New Phytol.; 2017; 213, pp. 1242-1256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14259]
219. Kolbert, Z.; Feigl, G.; Freschi, L.; Poór, P. Gasotransmitters in action: Nitric oxide-ethylene crosstalk during plant growth and abiotic stress responses. Antioxidants; 2019; 8, 167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox8060167] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31181724]
220. Guo, Z.; Tan, J.; Zhuo, C.; Wang, C.; Xiang, B.; Wang, Z. Abscisic acid, H2O2 and nitric oxide interactions mediated cold-induced S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in Medicago sativa subsp. falcata that confers cold tolerance through up-regulating polyamine oxidation. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2014; 12, pp. 601-612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12166] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24517136]
221. Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene and gibberellic acid interplay in regulation of photosynthetic capacity inhibition by cadmium. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol.; 2013; 1, 2.
222. Ahmed, W.; Imran, M.; Yaseen, M.; ul Haq, T.; Jamshaid, M.U.; Rukh, S.; Ikram, R.M.; Ali, M.; Ali, A.; Maqbool, M. et al. Role of salicylic acid in regulating ethylene and physiological characteristics for alleviating salinity stress on germination, growth and yield of sweet pepper. PeerJ; 2020; 8, e8475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8475]
223. Stearns, J.C.; Glick, B.R. Transgenic plants with altered ethylene biosynthesis or perception. Biotechnol. Adv.; 2003; 21, pp. 193-210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(03)00024-7]
224. Zhang, W.; Hu, W.; Wen, C.K. Ethylene preparation and its application to physiological experiments. Plant Signal. Behav.; 2010; 5, pp. 453-457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.4.10875]
225. Iqbal, N.; Fatma, M.; Gautam, H.; Sehar, Z.; Rasheed, F.; Khan, M.I.R.; Sofo, A.; Khan, N.A. Salicylic acid increases photosynthesis of drought-grown mustard plants effectively with sufficient-N via regulation of ethylene, abscisic acid, and nitrogen-use efficiency. J. Plant Growth Regul.; 2022; 41, pp. 1-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10565-2]
226. Liu, X.M.; Kim, K.E.; Kim, K.C.; Nguyen, X.C.; Han, H.J.; Jung, M.S.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, S.H.; Park, H.C.; Yun, D.J. et al. Cadmium activates Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 via accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Phytochemistry; 2010; 71, pp. 614-618. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.01.005]
227. Ecker, J.R. Reentry of the ethylene MPK6 module. Plant Cell; 2004; 16, pp. 3169-3173. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.161210]
228. Hahn, A.; Harter, K. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades and ethylene: Signaling, biosynthesis, or both?. Plant Physiol.; 2009; 149, pp. 1207-1210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.132241]
229. Schaller, G.E. Ethylene and the regulation of plant development. BMC Biol.; 2012; 10, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-10-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348804]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Asgher, Mohd 2
; Iqbal, Noushina 3
; Rasheed, Faisal 1 ; Sehar, Zebus 1
; Sofo, Adriano 4
; Khan, Nafees A 1
1 Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
2 Department of Botany, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, India
3 Department of Botany, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India
4 Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures: Architecture, Environment, Cultural Heritage (DiCEM), University of Basilicata, Via Lanera 20, 75100 Matera, Italy