1. Introduction
Organosulfur compounds are widely present in animals and plants due to their physiological activities, such as diallyl disulfide compounds in garlic, isothiocyanate compounds in cruciferous vegetables and some fruits, and sulfur-containing amino acids and vitamins. These molecules play a vital role in maintaining the metabolism of organisms and various life activities. Therefore, many researchers have conducted in-depth research on these compounds and found that some molecules containing thioheterocycles, thioureas, sulfonamides, thioethers, sulfoxides, sulfones, and other structures show biological activity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. For instance, Wang et al. [9] reported a class of sulfonylurea compounds with high herbicidal activities against Echinochloa crusgalli and Digitaria sanguinalis for pre- and post-emergence treatment and noted that they were safe for peanut as post-emergence treatment. A range of 5-substituted sulfonylurea derivatives discovered by Li et al. [10] showed good herbicidal activities against Amaranthus retroflexus and Brassica campestris for pre-emergence treatment. It is worth noting that compounds containing sulfide, sulfoxide, and sulfone structures have been widely used in materials [11,12], medicine [13,14,15], and pesticides [16,17,18,19,20,21,22] in the past few decades (Figure 1). The pre-emergence herbicide pyroxasulfone, discovered by Todoroki et al. [23], exhibited excellent herbicidal activity and crop safety, and it is currently used in the field.
Substituted 2-phenylpyridines discovered by Schaefer et al. exhibited good inhibition activity against weeds [24,25]. Substituted 3-(pyridin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide derivatives disclosed by Liu et al. showed excellent inhibitory activity against a variety of weeds [26,27,28]. Du et al. also reported that a range of kresoxim-methyl derivatives containing phenylpyridine moieties exhibited higher inhibitory activities against broadleaf weeds than mesotrione [29,30].
Herein, 18 novel α-trifluorothioanisole derivatives were synthesized through introducing phenylpyridine moieties into α-trifluorothioanisole. The inhibitory activities of the resultant compounds against broadleaf and grass weeds were determined.
2. Results and Discussions
2.1. Chemistry
The synthesis procedures for the target compounds used in this work are outlined in Scheme 1. Intermediates 3a–3f were obtained according to the literature [31]. The target compounds 5a–5f were prepared via nucleophilic substitution reaction from intermediates 3a–3f and compound 4. In addition, compounds 5a–5f were oxidized to yield compounds 6a–6f and 7a–7f using 3-chloroperbenzoic acid or hydrogen peroxide as oxidants according to previously disclosed methods [32,33]. After synthesis, all target compounds were characterized via HRMS and NMR. X-ray diffraction crystallography was further used to confirm the structure of compound 5a (Figure 2). The crystal data of compound 5a and the NMR spectrum of all target compounds are shown in the Supplementary Materials.
2.2. Greenhouse Herbicidal Activity Assays
As can be seen from Table 1, some target compounds exhibited excellent inhibitory activity against the tested dicotyledonous weeds but proved ineffective against monocotyledonous weeds. Of these, at 150 g a.i./hm2, compounds 5a, 5f, 6b, and 7a exhibited >80% inhibitory activity when used for the post-emergence treatment of the broadleaf weeds AT, AR, and EP, while compounds 6f and 7f exhibited >80% activity against AT and AR. Furthermore, compound 5a also effectively suppressed the growth of DS and SV, which was slightly better than the positive control fomesafen. Other compounds exhibited varying levels of general herbicidal activity. Further analysis revealed that compound 5a exhibited >85% inhibition against AT, AR, and EP for post-emergence treatment at 37.5 g a.i./hm2, which was slightly superior to the inhibition ability of fomesafen, whereas compound 5f also exhibited >70% inhibition against these three weeds.
From Table 1, we can see that the herbicidal activities of compound 5 were slightly better than those of compounds 6 and 7. According to the SAR of compound 5 in the field of herbicidal activity, when R1 and R2 were both substituted by hydrogen atoms (5a), the activities of compound 5 against three broadleaf weeds were better than those of other compounds. For compound 6, when R1 was substituted by a hydrogen atom and R2 was substituted by a fluorine atom (6b), the herbicidal activities of compound 6 were optimal. For compound 7, the optimal herbicidal activities were observed when R1 and R2 were substituted by either hydrogen atoms or fluorine atoms (7a, 7f).
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Instrumentation
All reagents and other materials were purchased from commercial sources and used without additional purification unless otherwise noted. A B-545 melting point instrument was used to determine melting point without calibration. A Bruker AV-400 or AV-500 MHz spectrometer was used to generate NMR spectra with DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 serving as solvents. An Agilent 6545 Q-TOF LCMS spectrometer was used for mass spectrometry. A Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer was utilized to collect crystallographic data.
3.2. Synthesis
The synthesis methods of the title compounds are outlined in Scheme 1.
3.2.1. General Approach to the Synthesis of Compounds 3a–3f
2,3-Dichloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine 1 (5 mmol), triphenylphosphorus (0.5 mmol), K2CO3 (10 mmol), substituted p-hydroxybenzeneboronic acid 2a–2f (5.5 mmol), and palladium(II) acetate (0.25 mmol) were mixed and stirred for 6 h with CH3CN (10 mL) and CH3OH (5 mL) at 50 °C under N2. Thereafter, the mixture was extracted using ethyl acetate (30 mL × 3), rinsed using brine, and concentrated. The remaining residue was then recrystallized using ethanol and water as solvents at 70 °C to obtain compounds 3a–3f [31].
3.2.2. General Approach to the Synthesis of Compounds 5a–5f
Substituted phenylpyridines 3a–3f (2 mmol), N,N-dimethylformamide (10 mL), and NaH (3 mmol, 0.12 g) were mixed and stirred at 20 °C for 30 min under N2. Next, 4-trifluoromethylthiobenzyl bromide (2.4 mmol) was added and stirred for 8 h at 60 °C. The mixture was extracted thrice using ethyl acetate (30 mL × 3), rinsed using brine, and concentrated. Residues were then purified via silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate (EA) and petroleum ether (PE) (VEA:VPE=1:15) to obtain compounds 5a–5f [31].
3.2.3. General Approach to the Synthesis of Compounds 6a–6f
Compounds 5a–5f (0.5 mmol), 85% 3-chloroperbenzoic acid (0.5 mmol), and dichloromethane (10 mL) were mixed and stirred at 20 °C for 6 h. The mixture was evaporated to remove the solvent. Residues were then purified via silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate (EA) and petroleum ether (PE) (VEA:VPE=1:7) to obtain compounds 6a–6f [32].
3.2.4. General Approach to the Synthesis of Compounds 7a–7f
Compounds 5a–5f (0.4 mmol), 30% hydrogen peroxide (1.6 mmol), and trifluoroacetic acid (2 mL) were mixed and stirred at 60 °C for 6 h. Thereafter, the mixture was made alkaline using a sodium hydroxide solution, extracted thrice using ethyl acetate (30 mL × 3), rinsed using Na2SO3, and concentrated. Residues were then purified via silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate (EA) and petroleum ether (PE) (VEA:VPE=1:10) to obtain compounds 7a–7f [33].
3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-(4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)thio)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyridine (5a): White solid, yield 78.8%, m.p. 93.2–95.4 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.99 (s, 1H), 8.51 (s, 1H), 7.76 (dd, J = 8.4, 3.4 Hz, 4H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.29 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 159.17, 158.79, 144.27 (q, J = 4.0 Hz), 140.63, 136.27, 135.71 (q, J = 3.1 Hz), 131.02, 129.57 (q, J = 308.4 Hz), 129.37, 129.17, 128.82, 124.39 (q, J = 33.0 Hz), 122.86 (q, J = 273.4 Hz), 122.29 (q, J = 2.0 Hz), 114.37, 68.43. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H13ClF6NOS [M+H]+ 464.0305, 466.0276, found 464.0308, 466.0277.
3-chloro-2-(3-fluoro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)thio)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (5b): White solid, yield 85.9%, m.p. 63.5–65.0 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.01 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 1H), 8.55 (s, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.70–7.64 (m, 3H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.57, 150.96 (d, J = 244.7 Hz), 147.15 (d, J = 10.6 Hz), 144.33 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 140.06, 136.34, 135.89 (q, J = 3.3 Hz), 129.79 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 129.58 (q, J = 308.3 Hz), 129.42, 128.92, 126.27 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 124.85 (q, J = 33.1 Hz), 122.80 (q, J = 273.4 Hz), 122.59 (q, J = 1.9 Hz), 117.22 (d, J = 20.0 Hz), 114.71, 69.36. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10ClF7NOS [M−H]− 480.0065, 482.0036, found 480.0064, 482.0043.
3-chloro-2-(3-chloro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)thio)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (5c): White solid, yield 94.0%, m.p. 82.0–83.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.57 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.78 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 3H), 7.67 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.49, 154.37, 144.38 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 140.14, 136.38, 135.89 (q, J = 3.1 Hz), 130.94, 130.25, 129.68, 129.60 (q, J = 309.1 Hz), 129.45, 128.62, 124.87 (q, J = 33.4 Hz), 122.81 (q, J = 274.1 Hz), 122.48, 121.21, 113.62, 69.28. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10Cl2F6NOS [M−H]− 495.9770, 497.9740, found 495.9767, 497.9740.
3-chloro-2-(3-nitro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)thio)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5 (trifluoromethyl)pyridine (5d): White solid, yield 86.5%, m.p. 114.5–116.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.06 (s, 1H), 8.63 (s, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 156.76, 151.71, 144.63 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 139.64, 138.99, 136.51, 136.12 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 135.49, 129.74, 129.66 (q, J = 308.8 Hz), 129.27, 128.63, 126.42, 125.33 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 122.83 (q, J = 274.1 Hz), 122.66 (q, J = 1.9 Hz), 115.28, 69.85. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10ClF6N2O3S [M−H]− 507.0010, 508.9981, found 507.0010, 508.9983.
3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-4-((4 ((trifluoromethyl)thio)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyridine (5e): White solid, yield 93.4%, m.p. 111.6–113.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.07 (s, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.42, 156.64, 144.47 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 139.94, 136.39, 135.93 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 135.35, 129.60 (q, J = 308.7 Hz), 129.51, 129.06, 128.33, 128.15 (q, J = 5.1 Hz), 125.02 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 123.45 (q, J = 273.6 Hz), 122.80 (q, J = 274.1 Hz), 122.48 (q, J = 1.8 Hz), 117.04 (q, J = 30.7 Hz), 113.76, 69.21. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H10ClF9NOS [M−H]− 530.0033, 532.0004, found 530.0031, 532.0010.
3-chloro-2-(2,3-difluoro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)thio)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (5f): White solid, yield 80.2%, m.p. 79.5–82.0 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.84 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.19–7.15 (m, 1H), 6.92–6.89 (m, 1H), 5.26 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 155.42, 149.29 (dd, J = 252.8, 11.0 Hz), 149.28 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.8 Hz), 144.45 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 141.76 (dd, J = 249.8, 14.4 Hz), 139.03, 136.78, 134.93 (q, J = 3.2 Hz), 132.36, 129.68 (q, J = 308.6 Hz), 128.26, 127.20 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 124.84 (t, J = 3.6 Hz), 124.65, 122.74 (q, J = 273.6 Hz), 120.22 (d, J = 12.2 Hz), 110.36 (q, J = 2.6 Hz), 70.97. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H9ClF8NOS [M−H]− 497.9971, 499.9942, found 497.9969, 499.9949.
3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-(4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyridin (6a): White solid, yield 41.7%, m.p. 123.3–124.7 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.00 (s, 1H), 8.53 (s, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.35 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 159.17, 158.87, 144.40 (q, J = 3.7 Hz), 143.20, 135.85 (q, J = 3.4 Hz), 134.70 (q, J = 1.4 Hz), 131.14, 129.50, 129.28, 128.67, 126.26, 124.83 (q, J = 337.5 Hz), 124.47 (q, J = 32.9 Hz), 122.96 (q, J = 273.7 Hz), 114.45, 68.47. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H13ClF6NO2S [M+H]+ 480.0254, 482.0225, found 480.0254, 482.0227.
3-chloro-2-(3-fluoro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (6b): White solid, yield 80.3%, m.p. 113.0–115.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.57 (s, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (dd, J = 12.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.59, 150.96 (d, J = 245.2 Hz), 147.10 (d, J = 10.4 Hz), 144.36 (q, J = 3.7 Hz), 142.56, 135.91 (q, J = 3.2 Hz), 134.94 (q, J = 1.0 Hz), 129.88 (d, J = 6.6 Hz), 129.44, 128.68, 126.31, 126.25, 124.86 (q, J = 33.1 Hz), 124.77 (q, J = 337.7 Hz), 122.81 (q, J = 273.9 Hz), 117.26 (d, J = 19.9 Hz), 114.75, 69.38. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10ClF7NO2S [M−H]− 496.0014, 497.9985, found 496.0015, 497.9993.
3-chloro-2-(3-chloro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (6c): White solid, yield 50.1%, m.p. 119.3–120.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.01 (s, 1H), 8.58 (s, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.87–7.83 (m, 3H), 7.76 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.55, 154.35, 144.47 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 142.68, 135.98 (q, J = 3.3 Hz), 134.86 (q, J = 1.0 Hz), 131.02, 130.37, 129.78, 129.53, 128.44, 126.33, 124.93 (q, J = 33.2 Hz), 124.83 (q, J = 337.6 Hz), 122.88 (q, J = 274.1 Hz), 121.23, 113.67, 69.30. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10Cl2F6NO2S [M−H]− 511.9719, 513.9689, found 511.9718, 513.9692.
3-chloro-2-(3-nitro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (6d): Yellow solid, yield 96.2%, m.p. 116.0–118.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.09 (s, 1H), 8.66 (s, 1H), 8.41 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 156.67, 151.67, 144.54 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 142.05, 138.94, 136.03 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 135.44, 134.97, 129.67, 129.31, 128.30, 126.38, 126.28, 125.30 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 124.77 (q, J = 337.8 Hz), 122.76 (q, J = 274.1 Hz), 115.28, 69.86. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10ClF6N2O4S [M−H]− 522.9959, 524.9930, found 522.9961, 524.9921.
3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyridine (6e): White solid, yield 51.1%, m.p. 117.9–120.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (s, 2H), 7.82 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.40, 156.58, 144.48 (q, J = 2.7 Hz), 142.44, 135.95, 135.37, 134.86 (q, J = 1.5 Hz), 129.53, 129.15, 128.20, 128.09, 126.29, 125.04 (q, J = 33.2 Hz), 124.77 (q, J = 339.3 Hz), 123.44 (q, J = 273.4 Hz), 122.80 (q, J = 274.3 Hz), 117.06 (q, J = 30.8 Hz), 113.78, 69.23. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H10ClF9NO2S [M−H]− 545.9983, 547.9953, found 545.9985, 547.9960.
3-chloro-2-(2,3-difluoro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (6f): White solid, yield 48.4%, m.p. 122.4–24.4 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.79-8.75 (m, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.13–7.10 (m, 1H), 6.86–6.83 (m, 1H), 5.25 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 154.15, 148.13 (dd, J = 253.0, 11.6 Hz), 147.93 (dd, J = 8.1, 3.1 Hz), 143.30 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 140.90, 140.59 (dd, J = 250.4, 14.4 Hz), 134.73 (q, J = 1.5 Hz), 133.79 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 131.19, 127.08, 126.08 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 125.42, 123.76 (t, J = 4.0 Hz), 123.66 (q, J = 335.8 Hz), 121.56 (q, J = 273.6 Hz), 119.28 (d, J = 12.4 Hz), 109.16 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 69.60. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H9ClF8NO2S [M−H]− 513.9920, 515.9891, found 513.9916, 515.9887.
3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-(4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyridine (7a): White solid, yield 40.1%, m.p. 132.7–134.8 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.02–8.97 (m, 1H), 8.53 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.78–7.75 (m, 2H), 7.21–7.18 (m, 2H), 5.45 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 158.92, 158.78, 147.74, 144.32 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 135.76 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 131.12, 131.03, 129.65, 129.23, 128.92, 128.58, 124.46 (q, J = 32.9 Hz), 122.88 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 119.41 (q, J = 326.7 Hz), 114.42, 68.10. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H11ClF6NO3S [M−H]− 494.0058, 496.0028, found 494.0061, 496.0035.
3-chloro-2-(3-fluoro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (7b): White solid, yield 48.4%, m.p. 111.8–114.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.58 (s, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.95 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (dd, J = 12.3, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.54 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.57, 150.93 (d, J = 245.4 Hz), 147.12, 146.91 (d, J = 10.5 Hz), 144.37 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 135.92 (q, J = 3.4 Hz), 131.11, 130.09 (d, J = 6.8 Hz), 129.47, 128.96, 128.79, 126.34 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 124.90 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 122.81 (q, J = 274.0 Hz), 119.41 (q, J = 327.6 Hz), 117.33 (d, J = 19.8 Hz), 114.76, 68.99. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10ClF7NO3S [M−H]− 511.9964, 513.9934, found 511.9968, 513.9937.
3-chloro-2-(3-chloro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (7c): White solid, yield 68.9%, m.p. 142.6–144.8 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.04–9.00 (m, 1H), 8.57 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.43, 154.12, 147.14, 144.36 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 135.86 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 131.07, 130.97, 130.50, 129.71, 129.45, 128.74, 128.66, 124.91 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 122.78 (q, J = 273.4 Hz), 121.23, 119.39 (q, J = 326.9 Hz), 113.64, 68.94. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10Cl2F6NO3S [M−H]− 527.9668, 529.9639, found 527.9664, 529.9640.
3-chloro-2-(3-nitro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (7d): Yellow solid, yield 24.8%, m.p. 129.1–131.6 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.06 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 1H), 8.62 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.15 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.67 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 156.61, 151.50, 146.52, 144.51 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 138.85, 136.00 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 135.50, 131.09, 129.65, 129.47, 128.86, 128.61, 126.43, 125.30 (q, J = 33.3 Hz), 122.72 (q, J = 273.5 Hz), 119.38 (q, J = 326.8 Hz), 115.26, 69.51. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H10ClF6N2O5S [M−H]− 538.9909, 540.9879, found 538.9905, 540.9882.
3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)pyridine (7e): White solid, yield 35.2%, m.p. 111.2–113.4 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.61 (s, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 8.13 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 157.39, 156.37, 146.94, 144.49 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 135.95 (q, J = 3.4 Hz), 135.44, 131.17, 129.55, 129.34, 128.77, 128.46, 128.22 (q, J = 5.3 Hz), 125.07 (q, J = 33.0 Hz), 123.44 (q, J = 273.5 Hz), 122.80 (q, J = 274.1 Hz), 119.41 (q, J = 327.3 Hz), 117.04 (q, J = 30.7 Hz), 113.77, 68.90. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H10ClF9NO3S [M−H]− 561.9932, 563.9902, found 561.9935, 563.9913.
3-chloro-2-(2,3-difluoro-4-((4-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)benzyl)oxy)phenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine (7f): White solid, yield 37.7%, m.p. 102.8–104.8 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.77 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.99 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.15–7.11 (m, 1H), 6.87–6.82 (m, 1H), 5.29 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 155.22, 149.30 (dd, J = 253.0, 11.3 Hz), 148.83 (dd, J = 8.2, 3.1 Hz), 145.53, 144.47 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 141.75 (dd, J = 250.2, 14.3 Hz), 134.96 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 132.35, 131.42, 131.27, 128.14, 127.29 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 124.99 (t, J = 3.9 Hz), 122.70 (q, J = 273.6 Hz), 119.92 (q, J = 326.4 Hz), 120.71 (d, J = 12.5 Hz), 110.29 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 70.38. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H9ClF8NO3S [M−H]− 529.9869, 531.9840, found 529.9869, 531.9824.
3.3. Herbicidal Activity Test
Levels of herbicidal activity for compounds 5a–5f, 6a–6f, and 7a–7f against the monocotyledonous weeds Digitaria sanguinalis (DS), Echinochloa crusgalli (EC), and Setaria viridis (SV), and the dicotyledonous weeds Abutilon theophrasti (AT), Amaranthus retroflexus (AR), and Eclipta prostrate (EP) were determined using previously disclosed methods [29,30,31,34].
All target compounds were dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide, diluted to an appropriate dose with distilled water containing 0.1% Tween-80 emulsifier, and used for seedlings at the three-leaf stage with three replicates. Seedlings treated with N,N-dimethylformamide and distilled water containing 0.1% Tween-80 emulsifier served as blank controls, with fomesafen-treated seedlings serving as positive controls. The application rates were 150, 75, and 37.5 g a.i./ha. Herbicidal activity was assessed visually after a 20-day period, with the results being listed in Table 1.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, 18 novel α-trifluorothioanisole derivatives containing phenylpyridine moieties were prepared as candidate herbicides. The preliminary herbicidal activity assay results show that some target compounds exhibited good herbicidal activities against broadleaf weeds at 150 g a.i./hm2. Among these, compound 5a possessed excellent activity (>85%) against AT, AR, and EP at 37.5 g a.i./hm2, which was slightly superior to fomesafen. Furthermore, compound 5f possessed good activity (>70%) against AT, AR, and EP at 37.5 g a.i./hm2, which was equivalent to that of fomesafen. Thus, compound 5a may be a lead compound for further structural optimization.
Z.C. and W.Z. carried out experimental work; Z.C. prepared the manuscript; X.D. designed the material and supervised the project; and Z.Y. and X.D. revised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
We are grateful to Yong-Hua Li (Zhejiang Research Institute of Chemical Industry) for assistance with the bioactivity assay.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The structures and herbicidal activities of α-trifluoroanisole derivatives for post-emergence treatment in a greenhouse assay setting.
| Compound | Chemical Structure | Dosage/ (g a.i./hm2) | Weed a | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | EC | DS | SV | AT | AR | EP | ||
| 5a | H | H | 150 | 10 ± 2 | 90 ± 5 | 80 ± 3 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 90 ± 2 |
| 75 | 0 ± 0 | 20 ± 3 | 0 ± 0 | 95 ± 1 | 100 ± 0 | 90 ± 5 | |||
| 37.5 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 90 ± 3 | 100 ± 0 | 85 ± 4 | |||
| 5b | H | F | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 50 ± 4 | 30 ± 5 | 60 ± 2 | 70 ± 5 | 85 ± 1 |
| 5c | H | Cl | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 40 ± 5 |
| 5d | H | NO2 | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 20 ± 4 | 20 ± 2 | 100 ± 0 |
| 5e | H | CF3 | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 20 ± 3 | 100 ± 0 |
| 5f | F | F | 150 | 20 ± 4 | 75 ± 2 | 60 ± 5 | 100 ± 0 | 95 ± 1 | 100 ± 0 |
| 75 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 95 ± 1 | |||
| 37.5 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 70 ± 5 | 90 ± 2 | 80 ± 4 | |||
| 6a | H | H | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 30 ± 1 | 90 ± 4 | 30 ± 3 |
| 6b | H | F | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 80 ± 5 |
| 6c | H | Cl | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| 6d | H | NO2 | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 80 ± 5 | 0 ± 0 |
| 6e | H | CF3 | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 80 ± 2 | 0 ± 0 |
| 6f | F | F | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 90 ± 3 | 80 ± 4 | 30 ± 3 |
| 7a | H | H | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 90 ± 4 | 85 ± 3 | 80 ± 1 |
| 7b | H | F | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 20 ± 2 | 95 ± 1 | 70 ± 5 |
| 7c | H | Cl | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 30 ± 3 | 0 ± 0 |
| 7d | H | NO2 | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 80 ± 4 | 0 ± 0 |
| 7e | H | CF3 | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 60 ± 2 | 0 ± 0 |
| 7f | F | F | 150 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 90 ± 5 | 70 ± 2 |
| fomesafen | / | 150 | 68 ± 4 | 76 ± 3 | 78 ± 5 | 98 ± 2 | 100 ± 0 | 76 ± 5 | |
| 75 | 63 ± 1 | 69 ± 5 | 67 ± 3 | 92 ± 2 | 95 ± 3 | 67 ± 4 | |||
| 37.5 | 47 ± 3 | 44 ± 2 | 56 ± 4 | 90 ± 1 | 87 ± 5 | 55 ± 2 | |||
aEC, Echinochloa crusgalli; DS, Digitaria sanguinalis; SV, Setaria viridis; AT, Abutilon theophrasti; AR, Amaranthus retroflexus; EP, Eclipta prostrate.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Ilardi, E.A.; Vitaku, E.; Njardarson, J.T. Data-mining for sulfur and fluorine: An evaluation of pharmaceuticals to reveal opportunities for drug design and discovery. J. Med. Chem.; 2014; 57, pp. 2832-2842. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm401375q] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24102067]
2. Zhang, C.-M.; Tan, X.-Y.; Feng, J.; Ding, N.; Li, Y.-P.; Jin, Z.; Meng, Q.-G.; Liu, X.-P.; Hu, C. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of 1-aryl-3-{4-[(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)thio]phenylurea derivatives as antiproliferative agents. Molecules; 2019; 24, pp. 2108-2115. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31167363]
3. Francesconi, V.; Cichero, E.; Schenone, S.; Naesens, L.; Tonelli, M. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel (thio)semicarbazone-based benzimidazoles as antiviral agents against human respiratory viruses. Molecules; 2020; 25, pp. 1487-1507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071487] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218301]
4. Abu-Hashem, A.A.; Al-Hussain, S.A.; Zaki, M.E.A. Design, synthesis and anticancer activity of new polycyclic: Imidazole, thiazine, oxathiine, pyrrolo-quinoxaline and thienotriazolopyrimidine derivatives. Molecules; 2021; 26, pp. 2031-2050. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26072031]
5. Li, Y.-T.; Yao, W.-Q.; Lin, J.; Li, F.-L.; Wu, Y.; Xu, J.-X. Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel triazole sulfonamide derivatives containing a benzylamine moiety. J. Heterocycl. Chem.; 2019; 56, pp. 2170-2178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhet.3610]
6. Yu, X.-L.; Liu, Y.-X.; Li, Y.-Q.; Wang, Q.-M. Design, synthesis, acaricidal/insecticidal activity, and structure-activity relationship studies of novel oxazolines containing sulfone/sulfoxide groups based on the sulfonylurea receptor protein-binding site. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2016; 64, pp. 3034-3040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00645]
7. Fu, Q.; Cai, P.-P.; Cheng, L.; Zhong, L.-K.; Tan, C.-X.; Shen, Z.-H.; Han, L.; Xu, T.-M.; Liu, X.-H. Synthesis and herbicidal activity of novel pyrazole aromatic ketone analogs as HPPD inhibitor. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2020; 76, pp. 679-868. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5591]
8. Hao, S.-L.; Cai, Z.-F.; Cao, Y.-Y.; Du, X.-H. Design, synthesis, and acaricidal activity of phenyl methoxyacrylates containing 2-alkenylthiopyrimidine. Molecules; 2020; 25, pp. 3379-3390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153379]
9. Wang, H.-L.; Li, H.-R.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Yang, W.-T.; Yao, Z.; Wu, R.-J.; Niu, C.-W.; Li, Y.-H.; Wang, J.-G. Discovery of ortho-alkoxy substituted novel sulfonylurea compounds that display strong herbicidal activity against monocotyledon grasses. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2021; 69, pp. 8415-8427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02081]
10. Zhang, D.K.; Hua, X.W.; Liu, M.; Wu, C.C.; Wei, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M.G.; Zhou, S.; Li, Y.H.; Li, Z.M. Design, synthesis and herbicidal activity of novel sulfonylureas containing triazole and oxadiazole moieties. Chem. Res. Chin. U.; 2016; 32, pp. 607-614. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-016-6029-2]
11. Wang, S.-H.; Li, M.; Su, B.; Lu, Q.-H. Preparation and properties of superhydrophobic polyphenylene sulfide composite coatings. Acta Polym. Sin.; 2010; 10, pp. 449-455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1105.2010.09124]
12. Zhang, M.-L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Zhang, M.-G.; Gao, Y.; Cheng, B.-W.; Li, Z.-H. Preparation and properties of polyphenylene sulfide/oxidized-polyphenylene sulfide composite membranes. React. Funct. Polym.; 2021; 160, 104842. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104842]
13. Zheng, H.-D.; Huang, Y.-J.; Weng, Z.-Q. Recent advances in trifluoromethylthiolation using nucleophilic trifluoromethylthiolating reagents. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2016; 57, pp. 1397-1409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.02.073]
14. Nohara, T.; Fujiwara, Y.; El-Aasr, M.; Ikeda, T.; Ono, M.; Nakano, D.; Kinjoet, J. Antitumor allium sulfides. Chem. Pharm. Bull.; 2017; 65, pp. 209-217. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c16-00844] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250342]
15. Cohen, A.; Crozet, M.D.; Rathelot, P.; Azas, N.; Vanelle, P. Synthesis and promising in vitro antiproliferative activity of sulfones of a 5-nitrothiazole series. Molecules; 2012; 18, pp. 97-113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules18010097] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23344190]
16. Umetsu, N.; Shirai, Y. Development of novel pesticides in the 21st century. J. Pestic. Sci.; 2020; 45, pp. 54-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D20-201]
17. Liu, X.-H.; Zhao, W.; Shen, Z.-H.; Xing, J.-H.; Xu, T.-M.; Peng, W.-L. Synthesis, nematocidal activity and SAR study of novel difluoromethylpyrazole carboxamide derivatives containing flexible alkyl chain moieties. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2017; 125, pp. 881-889. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.017]
18. Khalil, Y.; Flower, K.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Ward, P. Pyroxasulfone efficacy for annual ryegrass control is affected by wheat residue height, amount, and orientation. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2019; 76, pp. 861-867. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5590]
19. Li, P.; Wang, L.; Wang, X. Recent advances on the pesticidal activity evaluations of sulfone derivatives: A 2010 to 2020 decade in mini-review. J. Heterocycl. Chem.; 2020; 58, pp. 28-39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4173]
20. Su, S.-H.; Zhou, X.; Liao, G.-P.; Qi, P.-Y.; Jin, L.-H. Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of new sulfone derivatives containing 2-aroxymethyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole/thiadiazole moiety. Molecules; 2016; 22, pp. 64-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010064]
21. Xu, W.-M.; He, J.; He, M.; Han, F.-F.; Chen, X.-H.; Pan, Z.-X.; Wang, J.; Tong, M. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel sulfone derivatives containing 1,3,4-oxadiazole moieties. Molecules; 2011; 16, pp. 9129-9141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16119129] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045041]
22. Li, P.; Ma, Y.-H.; Zhou, J.-L.; Luo, H.; Yan, J.-W.; Mao, Y.-Y.; Wang, Z. The efficacy and underlying mechanism of sulfone derivatives containing 1,3,4-oxadiazole on citrus canker. Molecules; 2015; 20, pp. 14103-14117. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules200814103] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26247929]
23. Nakatani, M.; Ito, M.; Yoshimura, T.; Miyazaki, M.; Ueno, R.; Kawasaki, H.; Takahashi, S.; Todoroki, Y. Synthesis and herbicidal activity of 3-{[(hetero)aryl]methanesulfonyl}-4,5-dihydro-1,2-oxazole derivative; Discovery of the novel pre-emergence herbicide pyroxasulfone. J. Pestic. Sci.; 2016; 41, pp. 133-144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D15-078] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363103]
24. Schaefer, P.; Hampreche, G.; Puhl, M.; Westphalen, K.O.; Zagaret, C. Synthesis and herbicidal activity of phenylpyridines—A new lead. Chim. Int. J. Chem.; 2003; 57, pp. 715-719. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2533/000942903777678650]
25. Schaefer, P.; Hampreche, G.; Heistracher, E.; Koenig, H.; Klintz, R.; Muenster, P.; Rang, H.; Westphalen, K.O.; Gerber, M.; Walter, H. Preparation of Substituted 2-Phenylpyriden Herbicides. DE Patent; DE4323916A1, 19 January 1995.
26. Xie, Y.; Chi, H.W.; Guan, A.Y.; Liu, C.L.; Ma, H.J.; Cui, D.L. Design, synthesis, and herbicidal activity of novel substituted 3-(pyridin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2014; 62, pp. 12491-12496. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf504018z]
27. Xie, Y.; Peng, W.; Ding, F.; Liu, S.J.; Ma, H.J.; Liu, C.L. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) directed the discovery of 3-(pyridin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide derivatives as novel herbicidal agents. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2017; 74, pp. 189-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4693]
28. Xie, Y.; Chi, H.W.; Guan, A.Y.; Liu, C.L.; Ma, H.J.; Cui, D.L. Synthesis and evaluation of substituted 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-benzenesulfonamide derivatives as potent herbicidal agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem.; 2016; 24, pp. 428-434. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.08.037]
29. Cao, Y.Y.; Mao, D.J.; Wang, W.W.; Du, X.H. Kresoxim-methyl derivatives: Synthesis and herbicidal activities of (pyridinylphenoxymethylene)phenyl methoxyiminoacetates. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2017; 65, pp. 6114-6121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02710]
30. Cao, Y.Y.; Wang, W.W.; Du, X.H. Synthesis, crystal structure and herbicidal activity of methyl (E)-α-(methoxyimino)-2-((4-(3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-pyridine-2-yl)phenoxy)methyl)benzeneacetate. Chin. J. Struct. Chem.; 2019; 38, pp. 1123-1128.
31. Cao, Y.-Y.; Cai, Z.-F.; Zhang, W.-L.; Du, X.-H. Synthesis and herbicidal activity of novel β-methoxyacrylate derivatives containing a substituted phenylpyridine moiety. Chem. Res. Chin. U.; 2019; 35, pp. 1008-1011. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-019-9128-z]
32. Chen, C.-Y.; Li, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Cheng, C.-M.; Liu, Y. Advances in synthesis and application of sulfoxide compounds. Chin. J. Org. Chem.; 2011; 31, pp. 925-931.
33. Horvat, M.; Kodri, G.; Jereb, M.; Iskra, J. One pot synthesis of trifluoromethyl aryl sulfoxides by trifluoromethylthiolation of arenes and subsequent oxidation with hydrogen peroxide. RSC Adv.; 2020; 10, pp. 34534-34540. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0RA04621C] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35514387]
34. Cai, Z.-F.; Zhang, W.-L.; Cao, Y.-Y.; Du, X.-H. Synthesis and herbicidal activities of 2-phenylpyridine compounds containing alkenyl moieties. J. Heterocycl. Chem.; 2022; 59, pp. 1247-1252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4464]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
To discover novel herbicidal compounds with favorable activity, a range of phenylpyridine-moiety-containing α-trifluorothioanisole derivatives were designed, synthesized, and identified via NMR and HRMS. Preliminary screening of greenhouse-based herbicidal activity revealed that compound 5a exhibited >85% inhibitory activity against broadleaf weeds Amaranthus retroflexus, Abutilon theophrasti, and Eclipta prostrate at 37.5 g a.i./hm2, which was slightly superior to that of fomesafen. The current study suggests that compound 5a could be further optimized as an herbicide candidate to control various broadleaf weeds.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Zhang, Wenliang 1 ; Yan, Zhongjie 2 ; Du, Xiaohua 1 1 Catalytic Hydrogenation Research Center, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Green Pesticides and Cleaner Production Technology, Zhejiang Green Pesticide Collaborative Innovation Center, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
2 Agrowin (Ningbo) Bioscience Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315100, China




