Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Academic Procrastination
- Role of Subjective Discomfort in Academic Procrastination
- Conceptualizing Procrastination
- Current Measures
- The Present Study
- Method and Results
- Scale Construction
- Study 1: Item Reduction and Exploratory Factor Analysis
- Statistical Procedures
- Results
- Study 2: Factorial Validity, Measurement Invariance, and Reliability
- Statistical Procedures
- Results
- Factorial Structure
- Measurement Invariance
- Reliability
- Study 3: Construct Validity
- Instruments and Statistical Procedure
- Results
- Discussion
- Meaning and Significance of the BEPS Subscales
- Implications for Student Counselling
- Limitations and Future Research
- Appendix A
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Procrastination is the irrational delay of an intended task and is common among students. A delay can only be defined as procrastination when it is voluntary, the action was intended but not implemented, and the delay is accompanied by subjective discomfort. Established scales of procrastination cover mainly behavioral aspects but have neglected the emotional aspect. This inaccuracy concerning the construct validity might entail misconceptions of procrastination. Accordingly, we developed and validated the Behavioral and Emotional Academic Procrastination Scale (BEPS), which covers all aspects of the definition of procrastination. The 6-item scale measuring self-reported academic procrastination was tested in three studies. Study 1 (N = 239) evaluated the psychometric qualities of the BEPS, indicating good item characteristics and internal consistency. Study 2 (N = 1,441) used confirmatory factor analysis and revealed two correlated factors: one covering the behavioral aspect and the other reflecting the emotional aspect. Measurement invariance was shown through longitudinal and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Study 3 (N = 234) provided evidence for the scale’s convergent validity through correlations with established procrastination scales, self-efficacy, and neuroticism. The BEPS thus economically operationalizes all characteristics of academic procrastination and appears to be a reliable and valid self-report measure.
Procrastination, the voluntary delay of intended tasks or decisions, goes along with subjective discomfort and other negative consequences (e.g., Klingsieck, 2013; Steel, 2007). When defining procrastination, most authors agree that three main aspects must be met to classify a delay as an instance of procrastination. First, the delay must be voluntary (Steel, 2007), without external circumstances making the intended action unrealizable. Second, there needs to be an intention–action gap (





