It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The heterogeneity in the pathological and clinical manifestations of ovarian cancer is a major hurdle impeding early and accurate diagnosis. A host of imaging modalities, including Doppler ultrasound, MRI, and CT, have been investigated to improve the assessment of ovarian lesions. We hypothesized that pathologic conditions might affect the ovarian vasculature and that these changes might be detectable by optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM). In our previous work, we developed a benchtop OR-PAM and demonstrated it on a limited set of ovarian and fallopian tube specimens. In this study, we collected data from over 50 patients, supporting a more robust statistical analysis. We then developed an efficient custom analysis pipeline for characterizing the vascular features of the samples, including the mean vessel diameter, vascular density, global vascular directionality, local vascular definition, and local vascular tortuosity/branchedness. Phantom studies using carbon fibers showed that our algorithm was accurate within an acceptable error range. Between normal ovaries and normal fallopian tubes, we observed significant differences in five of six extracted vascular features. Further, we showed that distinct subsets of vascular features could distinguish normal ovaries from cystic, fibrous, and malignant ovarian lesions. In addition, a statistically significant difference was found in the mean vascular tortuosity/branchedness values of normal and abnormal tubes. The findings support the proposition that OR-PAM can help distinguish the severity of tubal and ovarian pathologies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Washington University, Biomedical Engineering, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
2 Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
3 Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002); Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
4 Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
5 Washington University, Biomedical Engineering, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002); Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)