Content area
Forests can store large amounts of carbon and provide essential ecosystem services. Massive tree planting is thus sometimes portrayed as a panacea to mitigate climate change and related impacts. Recent controversies about the potential benefits and drawbacks of forestation have centered on the carbon storage potential of forests and the local or global thermodynamic impacts. Here we discuss how global-scale forestation and deforestation change the Earth’s energy balance, thereby affect the global atmospheric circulation and even have profound effects on the ocean circulation. We perform multicentury coupled climate model simulations in which preindustrial vegetation cover is either completely forested or deforested and carbon dioxide mixing ratio is kept constant. We show that global-scale forestation leads to a weakening and poleward shift of the Northern mid-latitude circulation, slows-down the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, and affects the strength of the Hadley cell, whereas deforestation leads to reversed changes. Consequently, both land surface changes substantially affect regional precipitation, temperature, clouds, and surface wind patterns across the globe. The design process of large-scale forestation projects thus needs to take into account global circulation adjustments and their influence on remote climate.
Based on coupled climate model simulations the authors show that changes to the Earth’s surface energy balance following global-scale forestation and deforestation may change the strength of the jet stream, the Hadley cell, and the ocean circulation, which alters remote climate patterns across the globe
Details
Jet streams (meteorology);
Energy balance;
Earth surface;
Ocean models;
Atmospheric circulation;
Ecosystem services;
Vegetation cover;
Deforestation;
Carbon dioxide;
Ocean currents;
Water circulation;
Carbon sequestration;
Ocean circulation;
Surface properties;
Carbon;
Climate models;
Climate change mitigation;
Tree planting;
Mixing ratio;
Surface wind;
Surface energy
; Beyerle, Urs 2
; Davin, Edouard 3 ; Fischer, Erich M. 2
; De Hertog, Steven 4
; Schemm, Sebastian 2
1 ETH Zurich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Division of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope Reckenholz, Climate and Agriculture, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.417771.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 4681 910X)
2 ETH Zurich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
3 ETH Zurich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); University of Bern, Wyss Academy for Nature, Climate and Environmental Physics, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Bern, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5734.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0726 5157)
4 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.8767.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2290 8069)