Abstract
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EPAS) are important contemporary societal issues and religious faiths offer valuable insights into any discussion on this topic. This paper explores perspectives on EPAS of the four major world religions, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism, through analysis of their primary texts. A literature search of the American Theological Library Association database revealed 41 relevant secondary texts from which pertinent primary texts were extracted and exegeted. These texts demonstrate an opposition to EPAS based on themes common to all four religions: an external locus of morality and the personal hope for a better future after death that transcends current suffering. Given that these religions play a significant role in the lives of billions of adherents worldwide, it is important that lawmakers consider these views along with conscientious objection in jurisdictions where legal EPAS occurs. This will not only allow healthcare professionals and institutions opposed to EPAS to avoid engagement, but also provide options for members of the public who prefer an EPAS-free treatment environment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Lovell, Melanie 2 ; Best, Megan 3 1 QLD Specialist Palliative Rural Telehealth Service, Robina Hospital, Robina, Australia (GRID:grid.460802.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0613 6304); Bond University, Robina, Australia (GRID:grid.1033.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0405 3820); Griffith University, School of Medicine, Southport, Australia (GRID:grid.1022.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0437 5432); University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X); Renew Church Gold Coast, Gold Coast, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3)
2 HammondCare Palliative Care Services, Greenwich, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3); University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X)
3 University of Notre Dame, Institute for Ethics and Society, Chippendale, Australia (GRID:grid.266886.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0402 6494)





