1. Introduction
Edentulism, which may involve partial or total loss of tooth elements, is considered a public health problem due to its impact on general health and quality of life of individuals [1]. Of note, edentulism affects the masticatory capacity and, consequently, changes the individual’s eating habits and general health [1,2]. The literature shows that partially or completely edentulous patients can have an increased risk of hypertension, stroke [3,4,5,6], and cardiovascular diseases [5,6,7,8].
Furthermore, several lines of evidence have addressed the association between tooth loss, whether triggered by caries or periodontal disease, and abnormal levels of arterial pressure [9]. Prominent severe edentulism is considered the most serious oral condition associated with an increase of systolic arterial pressure [10].
Oral rehabilitation with complete dentures may promote a direct improvement in patients’ psychological health, aesthetics, or dietary/nutrition state [1]. However, the literature points out that the permanence of an abiotic structure in the oral cavity can favor biofilm development [11,12], thus promoting imbalance in the oral microbiota [13], and favoring the appearance of denture-related stomatitis (DRS) [11,12].
DRS is a biofilm-mediated chronic inflammation mainly rich in Candida spp. and bacterial strains [11,12] and can be aggravated by friction of the dentures with the mucosa, changes of the pH and salivary flow, restriction of the tongue′s action on the palate, and a reduction in mucins, such as mucin 1 (MUC 1), which are components of the physical barrier of the oral epithelium. This undesirable outcome may facilitate the breakdown of the epithelial barrier and increase the risk of microorganisms entering the bloodstream [14,15,16,17,18,19].
The mechanisms of the DRS pathogenesis are not clearly defined, but it is known that this comorbidity can trigger the activation of monocytes and T cells combined with the overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin IL-6, interferon γ [20,21], C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [5,8].
Scientific evidence indicates that a well-established hygiene protocol can have an effect on some local factors of inflammation [11,12,22] and, consequently, could promote a hemodynamic response (arterial pressure) [15]. As an effective hygiene protocol, denture brushing and immersion in sodium hypochlorite is an alternative protocol recommended by the dental clinic since it promotes stomatitis remission in mucosal membranes and biofilm reduction on acrylic base surfaces [11,12,22], it has a low cost, and can be easily implemented. Its efficacy has been related to the solvent action of lipids and fatty acids. However, little is known about the relationship of this hygiene protocol on specific responses of the inflammation process and a hemodynamic response (arterial pressure). Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of hygiene-protocol-associated palate brushing, denture brushing, and denture immersion in sodium hypochlorite on the remission of DRS, biofilm, microbial load, its effect on salivary cytokines and MUC 1, as well as the hemodynamic response. The null hypotheses tested were that the local treatment of DRS would not influence the remission of DRS, biofilm reduction, microbial load reduction, salivary cytokines, and concentration of MUC 1, as well as the hemodynamic response.
2. Results
A total of 33 patients were included, predominantly women with a mean age of 65.94 (±5.57) years (minimum: 54 years old and maximum: 75 years old), living with first-degree relatives, married, and retired (Table 1).
2.1. Denture-Related Stomatitis Remission
Comparing the score of DRS at the baseline and after treatment with the hygiene protocol, the data show that there was significant decrease in the DRS score (Table 2). The results showed a reduction in participant frequency (n, %) with more severe degrees of DRS (Type III) and an increase in participant frequency with the lowest degree or without DRS. Figure 1 shows that those patients with more severe DRS at the baseline improved their oral conditions toward intermediate inflammation (IB or II) after treatment. Patients classified as IB at the baseline exhibited a tendency toward remission of the disease or a lower degree of DRS (0, IA) after treatment.
2.2. Biofilm Reduction and Antimicrobial Activity
After treatment with the hygiene protocol, there was significant reduction in the biofilm percentage of the inner surface of the upper denture when compared with the baseline (Table 3).
For dentures, the microbial load of Candida spp., Gram-negative bacteria, Staphylococcus spp., and S. mutans was reduced after using the hygiene protocol. For the palate, there were no changes in the CFU count of Candida spp., Gram-negative bacteria, as well as Staphylococcus spp. The hygiene protocol showed significant activity against S. mutans, causing a decrease in the CFU count (Table 4).
2.3. Salivary Parameters, Identification and Concentration of MUC 1
The salivary flow (SF) and pH of the unstimulated saliva of the participants were not significantly different between the baseline and after the treatment (SF baseline: 0.4; SF treatment: 0.6; p = 0.2; pH baseline: 7.2; pH treatment: 7.2; p = 0.97). There was a significant increase of salivary concentration of MUC 1 (mU/mL) after the treatment (p = 0.049; Figure 2).
2.4. Evaluation of Cytokines
After the treatment of the DRS, there were significant reductions in the salivary concentrations of IL-6 (p = 0.038), IL-2 (p = 0.04), IFNγ (p = 0.04), and IL-10 (p = 0.041), suggesting a protective anti-inflammatory effect in relation to DRS. However, no significant change was observed for TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-17A (Figure 3).
2.5. Evaluation of the Arterial Pressure
The systolic arterial pressure (SAP-baseline: 142 ± 3 vs. treatment: 136 ± 3; p = 0.012) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP-baseline: 105 ± 2 vs. treatment: 100 ± 1; p = 0.02) were reduced after the treatment of DRS (Figure 4); however, there was no effect on diastolic arterial pressure (DAP-baseline: 86 ± 2 vs. treatment: 84 ± 1; p = 0.36).
3. Discussion
Use of the hygiene protocol contributed to the remission of DRS and control of biofilm and target microorganisms; as well as this, the hygiene protocol further promoted a regulation of salivary cytokines and MUC 1. These effects may have affected the hemodynamic response, since a slight, but significant, reduction of arterial pressure was observed. Based on these results, the null hypotheses were rejected. Although other studies have evaluated the effect of hygiene protocols on stomatitis remission, biofilm control, and microbial load reduction, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first observational study that has evaluated the relationship of these variables with salivary cytokines, MUC 1 expression, and hemodynamic response evaluated by arterial pressure. The results showed that the hygiene protocol has a positive effect on all of these variables. Clinically, this can affect the prevention of local inflammation with systemic repercussions, highlighting the need for awareness of basic oral health guidelines, aiming at reducing financial costs for public health treatment.
This protocol was conducted with a completely edentulous population, the majority being women, with an average age of 65.94 years, married, living with family, and with completed high school education or less. Furthermore, 93.94% of patients had a socioeconomic status of between one to three minimum salaries, that is, almost all were from a low-income socioeconomic demographic. This sample is characteristic of individuals who wear complete dentures, similarly to other studies [11,12,23]. Less-educated subjects with dentures can have more impaired oral health than those with more education and younger subjects with dentures perceive their oral health as more impaired than older denture-wearing subjects [24]. Regarding this aspect, the demographic characteristics were limited by the small number of subjects with dentures at a younger age and with more education. Therefore, the characteristics of the sample assume the same effects for age, education, and socioeconomic status for all denture-wearing subjects.
The reduction of the biofilm, a complex polymicrobial composed of yeast, bacteria, and polysaccharides is an important result because the proliferation of microorganisms on the surfaces of the dentures stimulates a local inflammatory process. Of note, the decrease in microbial load of the Candida spp. is important because this microorganism is most prevalent in the biofilm of complete denture wearers and has been directly related to DRS [11,12,22]. The results of the present study reinforce this issue, since the reduced CFU count of Candida spp. of the denture was accompanied by a decrease in the number of individuals with a severe degree of DRS. The current hygiene protocol decreased the CFU/mL count of Candida spp. by more than 1 log, confirming its antimicrobial efficacy [25].
The effect of the hygiene protocol was also tested regarding the bacteria commonly found in the multi-species biofilm that interact with each other [11,12]. In general, the results showed a decrease in the microbial load of the denture after use of the hygiene protocol, while the microbial load of the palate was not influenced, with the exception of S. mutans. These results suggest that denture hygiene may be the most important factor for DRS control [11,12,22]. The reduction of the microbial load of bacteria is important because of the interaction between Candida and different bacteria [26], suggesting that the global reduction of the microbial load impacts the remission of DRS, although the literature particularly emphasizes Candida species.
There was a significant increase of salivary concentration of MUC 1 (mU/mL) after the use of the hygiene protocol. The relationship between mucins and bacteria is somewhat paradoxical. This is because mucins protect the oral epithelium from bacterial colonization, but they can also serve as sites of bacterial attachment [27,28]. A mechanism based on the binding of bacteria to MUC 1 on oral surfaces would initiate a signaling cascade and an increase in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells. An increased production of cytokines can lead to the upregulation of MUC 1 gene expression, resulting in the increase of the number of mucin molecules on the cell surface. This would lead to a strengthening of the protective barrier and a decrease in bacterial invasion [16]. Based on the physiology of protection and upregulation of MUC 1 gene expression, it can be assumed that in the present study, with the reduction of microbial load and remission of stomatitis, there was an increase in free MUC 1 glycoproteins (without bacterial adhesion) in saliva (extracellular medium).
Clinical and preclinical studies show a correlation between increased levels of IL-6 and cardiovascular changes, for instance, in arterial hypertension [3,4]. The results of the current study showed a reduction of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 after using the current hygiene protocol, suggesting a lower predisposition to cardiovascular alterations. Thus, the hypothesis is that the antimicrobial activity of the hygiene protocol used reduced the CFU count of microorganisms, promoting a balance among them, which is directly related to the decrease of local inflammation and the decrease of IL-6. Previous studies have identified that inflammation and a cytokine cascade appear to be the most likely common pathways correlated with DRS and cardiovascular disease [5,8,29,30].
The results also show that the salivary concentration of cytokine IL-2 was reduced, and this outcome can be justified by the association between Candida albicans and elevated interleukin-2 production in cultures from patients with and without denture stomatitis. Candida infection plays an important role in the immunomodulation of this cytokine and in the occurrence of denture stomatitis lesions [31]. With the reduction of the microbial load of Candida spp., the salivary concentration of IL-2 may have been reduced after using the current hygiene protocol. There was a reduction of IFNγ and IL-10 when compared to the baseline, although previous studies showed lower levels of IFN-g among the elderly, regardless of DRS status [20,32]. The present study shows a reduction of the microbial load of the denture and improvement in the inflammation, which may have affected the level of IL-10 and consequently of IFNγ [21].
Whelton et al. [33] highlighted that observational studies have demonstrated graded associations between higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and an increased CVD risk [34,35]. In a meta-analysis of 61 prospective studies, the risk of CVD increased in a log-linear fashion from SBP levels <115 mm Hg to >180 mm Hg and from DBP levels <75 mm Hg to >105 mm Hg [34]. In that analysis, 20 mm Hg higher SBP and 10 mm Hg higher DBP were each associated with a doubling in the risk of death from stroke, heart disease, or other vascular disease [34]. Therefore, the slight but significant reduction of 6 mmHg in SAP and 5 mmHg in MAP observed in the current study may offer benefits to elderly patients if these changes in arterial pressure are maintained over a long period of time.
Limitations of this observational study included limited follow-up and a reduced sample of patients, which may influence the inference of data for other populations. Another limitation was not using a specific questionnaire to evaluate perceived stress during contact with the patients, in order to ensure that anxiety about medical and dental care does not have an undesirable influence. In future studies, assessing other factors related to cardiovascular risks is still pertinent, these factors include total cholesterol levels, HDL, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Patient Selection
This manuscript reports results from a controlled observational study about the effect of the treatment of denture-related stomatitis, for 10 days, on local inflammatory factors and hemodynamic responses to arterial pressure. The variables were measured at the beginning of the study (baseline) and after 10 days of the current treatment. The ethics committee at the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of Sao Paulo approved the trial protocol (CAAE: 93712418.1.0000.5419).
In the first dental visit, the patients were informed about the nature of the study by three researchers (C.B.A., C.V.F., and A.B.R.1). After agreeing to participate, they were evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Individuals who met the eligibility criteria were presented with the Free and Informed Consent Term for acknowledgment and signature. After that, the participants were evaluated through a clinical-anamnestic examination regarding sociodemographic aspects and the general health status and condition of their oral cavity. Participants were edentulous patients who requested treatment at the clinics of the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, where the study took place, being enrolled from August 2019 to February 2020.
The inclusion criteria were individuals from both genders, with good general health, defined by the absence of conditions that could alter the local inflammatory process and oral microbiota: for example, diseases such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus not accompanied by doctors, severe cardiovascular disorders involving the use of a pacemaker, stroke, myocardial infarction in the last 12 months, drug addiction, radiation therapy in the head and neck region, and a history of chemotherapy for neoplasms. As well as these criteria, we also included complete edentulous patients, users of upper and/or lower conventional complete dentures in acrylic resin, with denture stomatitis types IA, IB, II, or III, according to the Newton Modified Classification [34]. Exclusion criteria included any oral mucosal lesion apart from DRS, such as hyperplasias, papillomas, or thrush. As well as this, we also excluded systemic or local conditions that are predisposed to Candida spp. infection, such as conditions of immunosuppression, acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), cancer, use of medications such as antibiotics, or steroidal or antifungal agents in the 3 months before the study or during follow-up; and the use of palatal brushing or disinfectant solutions as part of routine oral hygiene, as these could interfere with the implementation of the hygiene protocol that included these procedures.
4.2. Hygiene Protocol
Participants were instructed to brush their hard palate for 2 min with a toothbrush with soft bristles and water (CS 5460; Curaprox, Curaden Swiss, Kriens, Switzerland); and also brush their dentures with a specific denture brush (BDC 152/153; Curaprox, Curaden Swiss, Kriens, Switzerland) and neutral liquid soap for 2 min (Pleasant; Perol Commercial and Industrial Ltd., Ribeirão Preto, Brazil) 3 times a day. After dinner, the dentures were soaked in 150 mL of 0.25% sodium hypochlorite (Super Candida® Indústria Anhembi, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil) for 20 min. The dentures were to remain immersed in clean water overnight. Participants were blinded to the disinfecting agent. The neutral liquid soap and solution were placed in a dosing bottle.
4.3. Study Outcomes
4.3.1. Denture-Related Stomatitis Remission
Patients were clinically examined and selected from a diagnosis of denture-related stomatitis degree Type IA or higher, according to the modified Newton Classification [36]: Type IA, petechial on the palatal mucosa, usually around the ducts of the palatine salivary glands; Type IB, the localized inflamed area under the denture base; Type II, generalized area of inflammation under the denture base; and Type III, papillary palatal hyperplasia associated with inflammation under the denture base. Standardized photographs of the palate were obtained (EOS Digital Rebel EF-S 18-55 with Canon MR-14 EX flash; Canon Inc) with the focus centralized on the median raphe region [12,22]. The images were transferred to the computer (C.B.A. and C.V.F.), and two researchers (C.H.S-L. and H.F.O.P.), who had previously calibrated in relation to the interpretation of the degrees of inflammation,, assigned the scores, thus confirming the degree of stomatitis.
4.3.2. Biofilm Reduction and Antimicrobial Activity
For biofilm reduction analyses, the intaglio surface of the maxillary complete denture was dyed with 1% neutral red (IMBRALAB Ltd., São Paulo, Brazil), photographed (EOS Digital Rebel EF-S 18-55 with Canon MR-14 EX flash; Canon Inc, Tóquio, Japão) [11,12], and the photographs were transferred to a computer to calculate the percentage of biofilm with the aid of the NIS-Elements BR software (Nikon Instruments Inc., 2019, Tóquio, Japão). The percentage of biofilm was calculated by the relation between the number of pixels in the dyed area multiplied by 100 and the number of pixels on the intaglio denture surface [12].
For analyses of microbial load, the denture was removed from the patient′s mouth and transferred to the laboratory for biofilm collection in an aseptic zone. The dentures were placed in Petri dishes and the biofilm was collected by adsorption using a sterilized toothbrush and 10 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The suspension was transferred to a tube containing glass beads, vortexed for 1 min, diluted from 100 to 10−3, and seeded in Petri dishes [37] with specific culture mediums such as CHROMagar™ Candida (Becton Dickinson, Paris, France) for isolation of Candida spp.; MacConkey Agar (Himedia Laboratories PVI Ltd., Mumbai, India) for isolation of Gram-negative microorganisms; Manitol Agar Salt (Kasvi Imp. e Dist. de Prod. para Laboratórios Ltd., Curitiba, Brazil) for isolation of Staphylococcus spp.; and SB20 Agar Modified by casitone for isolation of Streptococcus spp. The plates were incubated in a stove (De Leo Equipamentos Laboratoriais, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil) at 37 °C for 48 h. The plates with S. mutans were incubated in a microaerobic environment in an anaerobiosis jar (Permution, Curitiba, PR, Brazil). Subsequently, the dentures were brushed thoroughly and returned to the participants without biofilm. To obtain a palatal microbial load, a sterile cytology brush was rubbed for 1 min on the hard palate. The active tip was stored in a tube containing glass beads and was processed in the same way as the specimens collected from the dentures [12,22]. The microbial load was determined by considering that the dilution of CFUs ranged from 0 to 300 colonies and according to the formula CFU/mL = number of colonies × 10n/q, where n is the absolute value of dilution (0, 1, 2, or 3) and q is the quantity (mL) pipetted for each dilution at inoculation (0.05 mL).
4.3.3. Salivary Parameters, Identification, and Quantification of MUC 1
Saliva samples were collected from 9 to 11 am for 10 min by the method of spitting. The volume was recorded to calculate the salivary flow and the pH was measured with the aid of a pHmeter (PHTEK, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil) [15,38]. Subsequently, saliva samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove cellular debris, and an aliquoted supernatant was stored at −80 °C for analysis by ELISA and Cytometry. For identification and quantification of MUC 1 expression (mU/mL), pure saliva samples were thawed at room temperature and measured for MUC 1 concentrations using an enzyme immunoassay kit (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay-ELISA-RAB0375) according to the manufacturer′s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA). Previously, prepared curve standards and samples had been pipetted into 96-well plates sensitized with the capture antibody. After two and a half hours, the plates were washed and dried. A biotinylated detection antibody was added, and the plates were incubated again for one hour. The solution was discarded, and washings were performed. After the plates were dry, the streptoavidin-hydrogen peroxide conjugate was added. After forty-five minutes, the solutions were discarded again, and the plate wells were washed, dried, and tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added and incubated for thirty minutes in the dark. The assay process finished with the addition of stop solution, and plate readings at 405 nm were measured on an ELISA reader (Thermo ScientificTM MultiskanTM go Microplate Spectrophotometer, Waltham, MA, USA). As a control, wells without saliva were added only with the reagents present in the Kit. The assay was performed in duplicate. According to the absorbance curve, the results were presented as the mean difference between the readings in optical density units (OD) in experimental and control wells.
4.3.4. Evaluation of Cytokines
Salivary concentrations of IL-6, TNFα, IL-4, IL-2, IL-17, IFNγ, and IL-10 were measured using a BD™ Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Human Th1/Th2/Th17 (RRID: AB_2869353) Cytokine (BD; San Jose, CA, USA) in a single duplicate sample. Quantification was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, seven populations of beads with different fluorescence intensities were conjugated with a capture antibody specific for each cytokine, mixed to form the CBA. Bead populations were visualized according to their respective fluorescence intensities: from least to most brilliant. In CBA, cytokine capture beads are mixed with a detection antibody conjugated with fluorochrome (PE) and then incubated with the samples. Tubes for acquisition were prepared with the sample, bead mix, and detection reagent. The same procedure was performed to obtain the standard curve. The tubes were homogenized and incubated for three hours at room temperature in the dark. The results were generated in graphs and tables.
4.3.5. Evaluation of Arterial Pressure
Arterial pressures were recorded at the baseline and after the treatment of DRS. The participant’s arterial pressure was indirectly measured by the oscillatory sphygmomanometer method using an automated device (HEM7130, Omron Healthcare Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil); three measurements were performed at 5 min intervals recording the systolic and diastolic arterial pressure.
4.4. Statistical Analysis
The paired Wilcoxon and Fisher Tests evaluated biofilm removal and the CFU of microorganisms. The paired T test was used to assess salivary parameters (flow and pH), salivary MUC 1, cytokines, and arterial pressure before and after the use of the current hygiene protocol. All tests were conducted using the SPSS 25.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with a significance level of 5%.
5. Conclusions
The current hygiene protocol reduced the score of the DRS, the biofilm percentage of the inner surface, and microbial load count of the Candida spp. on dentures. In addition, the protocol promoted improvement in local inflammatory factors with an increase in MUC 1 and a decrease in IL-6, Il-2, Il-10, and INFγ combined with a reduction in systolic and media arterial pressures.
Conceptualization, A.B.R. (Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro) and C.H.S.-L.; data curation, A.B.R. (Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro), C.V.F., L.M.C. and C.B.d.A.; formal analysis and statistical support, C.H.S.-L. and H.C.S.; funding acquisition, H.C.S. and C.H.S.-L.; investigation, A.B.R. (Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro) and C.B.d.A.; methodology, A.B.R. (Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro), C.V.F., A.B.R. (Aline Barbosa Ribeiro), L.M.C. and C.B.d.A.; project administration, C.H.S.-L. and H.C.S.; supervision, C.H.S.-L.; validation, E.W., C.H.S.-L. and H.C.S.; visualization, H.d.F.O.P., C.H.S.-L. and E.W.; writing original draft, A.B.R. (Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro) and A.B.R. (Aline Barbosa Ribeiro); writing review and editing, C.H.S.-L., E.W., H.d.F.O.P. and H.C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Not applicable.
The authors thank Viviane de Cássia Oliveira for support in the Oral Rehabilitation Research Laboratory.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Participant’s frequency (N) according to the degree of denture-related stomatitis, at the baseline and after treatment.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Salivary Mucin 1 (MUC 1) concentration at the baseline and after the treatment of denture-related stomatitis (DRS).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Salivary cytokines at the baseline and after the treatment of denture-related stomatitis (DRS).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP; panel (A)) and mean arterial pressure (MAP; panel (B)) on the baseline and after the treatment of denture-related stomatitis (DRS).
Sociodemographic data of the sample expressed in absolute numbers (percentage).
| Variable | Total |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Female | 26 (78.79%) |
| Male | 7 (21.21%) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 14 (42.42%) |
| Unmarried | 4 (12.12%) |
| Divorced | 5 (15.15%) |
| Widowed | 6 (18.18%) |
| Separated | 3 (9.09%) |
| Other | 1 (3.03%) |
| Lives with | |
| Alone | 8 (24.24%) |
| Family | 24 (72.73%) |
| Friend | 1 (3.03%) |
| Education | |
| Illiterate | 4 (12.12%) |
| High school or less | 28 (30.3%) |
| Higher education | 1 (57.58%) |
| Income | |
| No income | 0 |
| 1 to 3 salaries | 31 (93.94%) |
| 4 to 7 salaries | 1 (3.03%) |
| 7 to 10 salaries | 1 (3.03%) |
Comparison of denture-related stomatitis score at the baseline and after treatment with the hygiene protocol; (95% CI).
| Baseline | Treatment | p ** | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | 2.77 (0.80) | 1.73 (1.09) | <0.001 |
| Median (CI) | 3.00 (2.00; 3.00) | 2.00 (1.00; 3.00) |
** Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
Comparison of biofilm percentage on inner surface of the upper denture at the baseline and after treatment (95% CI).
| Baseline | Treatment | p ** | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | 26.29 |
5.10 |
<0.001 |
| Median (CI) | 23.22 |
1.28 |
** Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
CFU counts of Candida spp., Gram-negative bacteria, Staphylococcus spp., and S. mutans at the baseline (B) and after treatment (T).
| Denture | Palate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | T | p ** | B | T | p ** | ||
| Candida spp. | Mean | 3.64 | 1.20 | <0.001 | 0.72 | 0.62 (1.28) | 0.798 |
| (SD) | (2.26) | (1.76) | (1.08) | ||||
| Median | 4.54 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| (CI) | (1.79; 5.41) | (0.0; 2.48) | (0.0; 1.61) | (0.0; 0.0) | |||
| Gram-negative | Mean | 1.31 | 0.52 | 0.004 | 0.64 | 0.93 | 0.259 |
| (SD) | (1.26) | (1.20) | (1.21) | (1.32) | |||
| Median | 1.32 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| (CI) | (0.0; 2.0) | (0.0; 0.0) | (0.0; 132) | (0.0; 1.61) | |||
| Staphylococcus spp. | Mean | 1.10 | 0.27 | 0.001 | 1.05 | 0.82 | 0.798 |
| (SD) | (0.96) | (0.63) | (0.95) | (0.90) | |||
| Median | 1.32 | 0.0 | 1.32 | 0.0 | |||
| (CI) | (0.0; 1.91) | (0.0; 0.0) | (0.0; 1.61) | (0.0; 1.79) | |||
| S. mutans | Mean | 3.9 | 1.05 | <0.001 | 2.69 | 1.32 | <0.001 |
| (SD) | (2.7) | (2.07) | (1.52) | (0.88) | |||
| Median | 4.34 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | |||
| (CI) | (1.32; 6.34) | (0.0; 1.32) | (1.0; 3.99) | (1.0; 1.0) | |||
** Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval; B: baseline; T: treatment.
References
1. Satishkumar, C.S.; Nair, S.J.; Joseph, A.M.; Suresh, S.; Muthupandian, I.; Kumaresan, S.; Ashekhi, A.; Nadeem, G. Relationship between perceived chewing ability, oral health related quality of life and depressive symptoms among completely edentulous individuals. Indian J. Dent. Res.; 2021; 32, pp. 211-215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_1141_20] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34810391]
2. Da, D.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Luo, J.; Ding, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, B. et al. Association between tooth loss and hypertension among older Chinese adults: A community-based study. BMC Oral Health; 2019; 19, 277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0966-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818283]
3. Williams, R.C.; Offenbacher, S. Periodontal medicine: The emergence of a new branch of periodontology. Periodontology; 2000; 23, pp. 9-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2230101.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11276770]
4. Interleukin-6 Receptor Mendelian Randomisation Analysis (IL6R MR) Consortium. The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: A mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet; 2012; 379, pp. 1214-1224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60110-X]
5. Maciąg, J.; Osmenda, G.; Nowakowski, D.; Wilk, G.; Maciąg, A.; Mikołajczyk, T.; Nosalski, R.; Sagan, A.; Filip, M.; Dróżdż, M. et al. Denture-related stomatitisis associated with endothelial dysfunction. Biomed. Res. Int.; 2014; 2014, 474016. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/474016]
6. Fagundes, N.C.F.; Couto, R.S.D.; Brandão, A.P.T.; Lima, L.A.O.; Bittencourt, L.O.; Souza-Rodrigues, R.D.; Freire, M.A.M.; Maia, L.C.; Lima, R.R. Association between Tooth Loss and Stroke: A Systematic Review. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.; 2020; 29, 104873. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104873]
7. Hosadurga, R.; Kyaw Soe, H.H.; Peck Lim, A.T.; Adl, A.; Mathew, M. Association between tooth loss and hypertension: A cross-sectional study. J. Family Med. Prim. Care; 2020; 9, pp. 925-932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_811_19]
8. Osmenda, G.; Maciąg, J.; Wilk, G.; Maciąg, A.; Nowakowski, D.; Loster, J.; Dembowska, E.; Robertson, D.; Guzik, T.; Cześnikiewicz-Guzik, M. Treatment of denture-related stomatitis improves endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated vascular dilation. Arch. Med. Sci.; 2017; 13, pp. 66-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.64715]
9. Peres, M.A.; Tsakos, G.; Barbato, P.R.; Silva, D.A.S.; Peres, K.G. Tooth loss is associated with increased blood pressure in adults—A multidisciplinary population-based study. J. Clin. Periodontol.; 2012; 39, pp. 824-833. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01916.x]
10. Mendes, J.J.; Viana, J.; Cruz, F.; Pereira, D.; Ferreira, S.; Pereira, P.; Proença, L.; Machado, V.; Botelho, J.; Rua, J. et al. Blood Pressure and Tooth Loss: A Large Cross-Sectional Study with Age Mediation Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2021; 18, 85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010285]
11. Badaró, M.M.; Salles, M.M.; Leite, V.M.F.; Arruda, C.N.F.; Oliveira, V.C.; Nascimento, C.; Souza, R.F.; Paranhos, H.F.O.; Silva-Lovato, C.H. Clinical trial for evaluation of Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite as denture cleanser. J. Appl. Oral Sci.; 2017; 25, pp. 324-334. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0222] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28678952]
12. Araujo, C.B.; Ribeiro, A.B.; Fortes, C.V.; Bueno, F.L.; De Wever, B.; Oliveira, V.C.; Macedo, A.P.; Paranhos, H.F.O.; da Silva, C.H.L. Effect of local hygiene protocols on denture-related stomatitis, biofilm, microbial load, and odor: A randomized controlled trial. J. Prosthet. Dent.; 2021; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33736863]
13. Morse, D.J.; Smith, A.; Wilson, M.J.; Marsh, L.; White, L.; Posso, R.; Bradshaw, D.J.; Wei, X.; Lewis, M.A.O.; Williams, D.W. Molecular community profiling of the bacterial microbiota associated with denture-related stomatitis. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 10228. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46494-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31308427]
14. Le Bars, P.; Kouadio, A.A.; N’Goran, J.K.; Badran, Z.; Soueidan, A. Relationship between removable prosthesis and some systemics disorders. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc.; 2015; 15, pp. 292-299. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.171828] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929530]
15. Ribeiro, A.B.; de Araújo, C.B.; Silva, L.E.V.; Fazan-Junior, R.; Salgado, H.C.; Ribeiro, A.B.; Fortes, C.V.; Bueno, F.L.; de Oliveira, V.C.; Paranhos, H.F.O. et al. Hygiene protocols for the treatment of denture-related stomatitis: Local and systemic parameters analysis—A randomized, double-blind trial protocol. Trials; 2019; 20, 661. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3854-x]
16. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Nunes, D.P.; Troxler, R.F.; Offner, G.D. Pro-inflammatory cytokines up-regulate MUC1 gene expression in oral epithelial cells. J. Dent. Res.; 2003; 82, pp. 883-887. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910308201107]
17. Chang, W.I.; Chang, J.Y.; Kim, Y.Y.; Lee, G.; Kho, H.S. MUC1 expression in the oral mucosal epithelial cells of the elderly. Arch. Oral Biol.; 2011; 56, pp. 885-890. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.02.007]
18. Gabryel-Porowska, H.; Gornowicz, A.; Bielawska, A.; Wójcicka, A.; Maciorkowska, E.; Grabowska, S.Z.; Bielawski, K. Mucin levels in saliva of adolescents with dental caries. Med. Sci. Monit.; 2014; 18, pp. 72-77.
19. Kho, H.S. Oral epithelial MUC1 and oral health. Oral Dis.; 2018; 24, pp. 19-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.12713]
20. Gasparoto, T.H.; Sipert, C.R.; de Oliveira, C.E.; Porto, V.C.; Santos, C.F.; Campanelli, A.P.; Lara, V.S. Salivary immunity in elderly individuals presented with Candida-related denture stomatitis. Gerodontology; 2012; 29, pp. 331-339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00476.x]
21. Corsetti, P.P.; de Almeida, L.A.; Carvalho, N.B.; Azevedo, V.; Silva, T.M.; Teixeira, H.C.; Faria, A.C.; Oliveira, S.C. Lack of endogenous IL-10 enhances production of proinflammatory cytokines and leads to Brucella abortus clearance in mice. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e74729. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074729] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069337]
22. Badaró, M.M.; Bueno, F.L.; Arnez, R.M.; Oliveira, V.C.; Macedo, A.P.; de Souza, R.F.; Paranhos, H.F.O.; Silva-Lovato, C.H. The effects of three disinfection protocols on Candida spp., denture stomatitis, and biofilm: A parallel group randomized controlled trial. J. Prosthet. Dent.; 2020; 124, pp. 690-698. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.024]
23. de Souza, R.; Chaves, C.; Rohani, K.; Bouferguene, S.; Barbeau, J.; Borie, E.; Weber, B.; Fuentes, R.; Crizostomo, L.; Silva-Lovato, C. et al. Palatal brushing for the treatment of denture stomatitis: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. J. Prosthodont. Res.; 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00258]
24. John, M.T.; Koepsell, T.D.; Hujoel, P.; Miglioretti, D.L.; LeResche, L.; Micheelis, W. Demographic factors, denture status and oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.; 2004; 32, pp. 125-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0301-5661.2004.00144.x]
25. Brazilian Pharmacopeia National Form/Brazil Ministry of Health. Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria; 2nd ed. Anvisa: Brasília, Brazil, 2012; pp. 6-7.
26. Millsap, K.W.; Bos, R.; van der Mei, H.C.; Busscher, H.J. Adhesion and surface aggregation of Candida albicans from saliva on acrylic surfaces with adhering bacteria as studied in a parallel plate flow chamber. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1999; 75, pp. 351-359. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002014306612]
27. Lillehoj, E.P.; Hyun, S.W.; Kim, B.T.; Zhang, X.G.; Lee, D.I.; Rowland, S.; Kim, K.C. Muc1 mucins on the cell surface are adhesion sites for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2001; 280, pp. 181-187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.1.L181]
28. Lillehoj, E.P.; Kim, B.T.; Kim, K.C. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellin as an adhesin for Muc1 mucin. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2002; 282, pp. 751-756. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00383.2001]
29. Maciąg, J.; Mikołajczyk, T.; Matusik, P.; Nowakowski, D.; Robertson, D.; Maciąg, A.; Osmenda, G.; Cześnikiewicz-Guzik, M. The Effect of Treatment of Denture-related Stomatitis on Peripheral T Cells and Monocytes. Oral Health Prev. Dent.; 2017; 15, pp. 259-268.
30. Aguilera, E.M.; Suvan, J.; Buti, J.; Czesnikiewicz-Guzik, M.; Ribeiro, A.B.; Orlandi, M.; Guzik, T.J.; Hingorani, A.D.; Nart, J.; D’Aiuto, F. Periodontitis is associated with hypertension:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc. Res.; 2020; 116, pp. 28-39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz201] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549149]
31. Rodriguez-Archilla, A.; Urquia, M.; Cutando, A.; Asencio, R. Denture stomatitis: Quantification of interleukin-2 production by mononuclear blood cells cultured with Candida albicans. J. Prosthet. Dent.; 1996; 75, pp. 426-431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90036-0]
32. Pesee, S.; Arpornsuwan, T. Salivary cytokine profile in elders with Candidarelated denture stomatitis. Gerodontology; 2015; 32, pp. 132-140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ger.12064]
33. Whelton, P.K.; Carey, R.M.; Aronow, W.S.; Casey, D.E., Jr.; Collins, K.J.; Dennison Himmelfarb, C.; DePalma, S.M.; Gidding, S.; Jamerson, K.A.; Jones, D.W. et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension; 2018; 71, pp. 1269-1324.
34. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: A meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet; 2002; 360, pp. 1903-1913. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8]
35. Rapsomaniki, E.; Timmis, A.; George, J.; Pujades-Rodriguez, M.; Shah, A.D.; Denaxas, S.; White, I.R.; Caulfield, M.J.; Deanfield, J.E.; Smeeth, L. et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: Lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet; 2014; 383, pp. 1899-1911. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60685-1]
36. Kabawat, M.; de Souza, R.F.; Badaró, M.M.; Koninck, L.; Barbeau, J.; Rompré, P.; Emami, E. Phase 1 clinical trial on the effect of palatal brushing on denture stomatitis. Int. J. Prosthodont.; 2014; 27, pp. 311-319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3844]
37. Paranhos, H.F.O.; Panzeri, H.; Lara, E.H.; Candido, R.C.; Ito, I.Y. Capacity new denture paste. Braz. Dent. J.; 2000; 11, pp. 97-104.
38. Ribeiro, A.B.; Araújo, C.B.; Fortes, C.V.; Bueno, F.L.; Oliveira, V.C.; Macedo, A.P.; Paranhos, H.F.O.; Watanabe, E.; De Wever, B.; Silva-Lovato, C.H. Effect of Denture Hygiene Protocols on Patient Satisfaction, Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, and Salivary Parameters: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Prosthodont.; 2022; 31, pp. e12-e19.
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Salgado, Helio Cesar 2
; Silva-Lovato, Cláudia Helena 1 1 Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil
2 Department of Physiology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil
3 Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil