It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objectives
Dry weight assessment (DWA) is an important part of dialysis and fluid management in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. With the development of bioimpedance analysis (BIA), the development of the direct segmental multi-frequency BIA (DSM–BIA) has provided a more convenient measure for DWA of dialysis patients, but its accuracy remains unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the application of DSM–BIA in DWA of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.
Design
This is a cross-sectional study. Using the conventional BIA as a reference, we examined the accuracy of the DSM–BIA technique for assessing dry weight in CAPD patients and analyzed the potential factors influencing their fluid volume status.
Setting and participants
A total of 31 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving CAPD and 310 healthy volunteers were recruited for this study.
Methods
The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the consistency between DSM–BIA and the conventional BIA for DWA. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to explore the influencing factors associated with the edema index.
Results
DSM–BIA and the conventional BIA technology were consistent in DWA in CAPD patients (ICC female 0.972, ICC male 0.882, ICC total 0.960). Similarly, Bland–Altman plots showed good agreements between the two methods in DWA for both genders. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis showed both eGFR level (P = 0.04) and serum NT-pro BNP concentration (P = 0.007) were positively correlated with the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TCW).
Conclusions
DSM–BIA in DWA has good accuracy in clinical applications and has potential application value for fluid volume management in CAPD patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.24695.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1431 9176)
2 Ningxia Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Chinese Medicine Research Institute, Ningxia, China (GRID:grid.24695.3c)
3 Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Department of Nephrology, The South District of Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410318.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0632 3409)