It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ever since family systems therapy became a field of study in the mid-20th Century, measuring family functioning has been about as easy as measuring the quantum world. It is vastly complex and variable—and messy. Over the years, various quantitative measures have attempted to master this feat, with varying success. However, quantitative, postpositivist measures do not collect rich, meaningful data about the lived experiences of real people in unique family situations. This descriptive phenomenological qualitative study gathered data on participants’ perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability, usability, and relevance of a new family systems intervention tool, the Differentiation of Family System Inventory (DoFSI). This tool, based on Bowen family systems theory (BFST; Bowen, 1978) and Papero’s (2018) five-dimensional framework, follows the Research Domain Criteria established by the National Institute of Mental Health (2021) in 2009. Involving the active participation of potential consumers in the process of psychosocial research and intervention development can improve both adherence and effectiveness because such an approach addresses the outcomes of most importance to them. By seeking the input of 13 qualified participants in developing the DoFSI, this applied study bridged the gap between research and real life. Before data collection, four subject matter experts provided feedback on an early version of the DoFSI, precipitating a revision that became the version used in this study. Then, in April 2022, nine participants who completed this new version via Qualtrics offered additional feedback, by semi-structured interview, on its content validity and usefulness. How the participants described their experience of completing the inventory became the data for this study, analyzed using NVivo 12. The final version of the DoFSI became a derivative of this data and is now available for use in clinical practice and qualitative research.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





