Abstract
Background
EGFR targeting is currently the main treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Results of different clinical trials show that patients with wild-type KRAS and BRAF benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) cetuximab (CTX) or panitumumab. Unfortunately, despite initial response, patients soon became refractory. Tumor heterogeneity and multiple escaping routes have been addressed as the main culprit, and, behind genomic alterations already described, changes in signaling pathways induced by drug pressure are emerging as mechanisms of acquired resistance. We previously reported an association between reduced sensitivity to CTX and increased expression of IL-1. However, how IL-1 mediates CTX resistance in mCRC is still unclear.
Methods
Under CTX treatment, the upregulation of IL-1R1 expression and a senescence program in sensitive colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines is examined over time using qPCR, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence.
Results
In sensitive CRC cells, IL-1 appeared responsible for a CTX-mediated G0 phase arrest. On the contrary, CTX-resistant CRC cells (CXR) maintained high mRNA levels of IL-1R1 and a post-senescence reprogramming, as indicated by increased SNAIL expression. Interestingly, treatment of CXR cells with a recombinant decoy, able to sequester the soluble form of IL-1, pushed CTX-resistant CRC cells back into a stage of senescence, thus blocking their proliferation. Our model suggests a trans-regulatory mechanism mediated by IL-1 on EGFR signaling. By establishing senescence and regulating EGFR activity and expression, IL-1 exposure ultimately bestows resistance.
Conclusions
To sum up, our findings point to the combined blockage of IL-1R and EGFR as a promising therapeutical approach to restore sensitivity to EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibodies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758); Bologna University Hospital Authority St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Centre for Applied Biomedical Research (CRBA), Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758)
2 University of Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758)
3 National Institute of Biostructures and Biosystems (INBB), National Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Stem Cell Engineering, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f)
4 University of Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758); National Institute of Biostructures and Biosystems (INBB), National Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Stem Cell Engineering, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f)





