Abstract

Introduction

Identifying ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who can be referred back to the general practitioner (GP) can improve patient-tailored care. However, the long-term prognosis of patients who are returned to the care of their GP is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the long-term prognosis of patients referred back to the GP after treatment in accordance with a 1-year institutional guideline-based protocol.

Methods

All consecutive patients treated between February 2004 up to May 2013 who completed the 1‑year institutional MISSION! Myocardial Infarction (MI) follow-up and who were referred to the GP were evaluated. After 1 year of protocolised monitoring, asymptomatic patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction >45% on echocardiography were referred to the GP. Long-term prognosis was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify independent predictors for 5‑year all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Results

In total, 922 STEMI patients were included in this study. Mean age was 61.6 ± 11.7 years and 74.4% were male. Median follow-up duration after the 1‑year MISSION! MI follow-up was 4.55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.28–5.00). The event-free survival was 93.2%. After multivariable analysis, age, not using an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin-II (AT2) antagonist and impaired left ventricular function remained statistically significant predictors for 5‑year all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that 80.3% remained event-free for MACE after 5 years. Multivariable predictors for MACE were current smoking and a mitral regurgitation grade ≥2.

Conclusion

STEMI patients who are referred back to their GP have an excellent prognosis after being treated according to the 1‑year institutional MISSION! MI protocol.

Details

Title
Myocardial infarction patients referred to the primary care physician after 1‑year treatment according to a guideline-based protocol have a good prognosis
Author
Bodde, M. C. 1 ; van Hattem, N. E. 1 ; Abou, R. 1 ; Mertens, B. J. A. 2 ; van Duijn, H. J. 3 ; Numans, M. E. 4 ; Bax, J. J. 1 ; Schalij, M. J. 1 ; Jukema, J. W. 1 

 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Leiden, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10419.3d) (ISNI:0000000089452978) 
 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10419.3d) (ISNI:0000000089452978) 
 General Practice H.J. van Duijn, Katwijk, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10419.3d) 
 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10419.3d) (ISNI:0000000089452978) 
Pages
550-558
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Nov 2019
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
15685888
e-ISSN
18766250
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2729540123
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.