Abstract
Background
Exome sequencing (ES) has probable utility for shortening the diagnostic odyssey of children with suspected genetic disorders. This report describes the design and methods of a study evaluating the potential of ES as a routine clinical tool for pediatric patients who have suspected genetic conditions and who are in the early stages of the diagnostic odyssey.
Methods
The North Carolina Clinical Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing (NCGENES) 2 study is an interdisciplinary, multi-site Phase III randomized controlled trial of two interventions: educational pre-visit preparation (PVP) and offer of first-line ES. In this full-factorial design, parent-child dyads are randomly assigned to one of four study arms (PVP + usual care, ES + usual care, PVP + ES + usual care, or usual care alone) in equal proportions. Participants are recruited from Pediatric Genetics or Neurology outpatient clinics in three North Carolina healthcare facilities. Eligible pediatric participants are < 16 years old and have a first visit to a participating clinic, a suspected genetic condition, and an eligible parent/guardian to attend the clinic visit and complete study measures. The study oversamples participants from underserved and under-represented populations. Participants assigned to the PVP arms receive an educational booklet and question prompt list before clinical interactions. Randomization to offer of first-line ES is revealed after a child’s clinic visit. Parents complete measures at baseline, pre-clinic, post-clinic, and two follow-up timepoints. Study clinicians provide phenotypic data and complete measures after the clinic visit and after returning results. Reportable study-related research ES results are confirmed in a CLIA-certified clinical laboratory. Results are disclosed to the parent by the clinical team. A community consultation team contributed to the development of study materials and study implementation methods and remains engaged in the project.
Discussion
NCGENES 2 will contribute valuable knowledge concerning technical, clinical, psychosocial, and health economic issues associated with using early diagnostic ES to shorten the diagnostic odyssey of pediatric patients with likely genetic conditions. Results will inform efforts to engage diverse populations in genomic medicine research and generate evidence that can inform policy, practice, and future research related to the utility of first-line diagnostic ES in health care.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.govNCT03548779. Registered on June 07, 2018.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Milko, Laura V. 2 ; Waltz, Margaret 3 ; Griesemer, Ida 4 ; Mollison, Lonna 2 ; Grant, Tracey L. 2 ; Farnan, Laura 5 ; Roche, Myra 6 ; Navas, Angelo 2 ; Lightfoot, Alexandra 7 ; Foreman, Ann Katherine M. 2 ; O’Daniel, Julianne M. 2 ; O’Neill, Suzanne C. 8 ; Lin, Feng-Chang 9 ; Roman, Tamara S. 2 ; Brandt, Alicia 2 ; Powell, Bradford C. 2 ; Rini, Christine 10 ; Berg, Jonathan S. 2 ; Bensen, Jeannette T. 1 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
4 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Heath Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
5 University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.410711.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 1034 1720)
6 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Genetics, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
7 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Heath Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
8 Georgetown University, Department of Oncology, Washington, USA (GRID:grid.213910.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 1955 1644)
9 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Biostatistics, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
10 Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507); Northwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507)




