Abstract
Background
Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a symptom complex affecting 12–14% of the UK adult female population. Symptoms include urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, increased daytime urinary frequency and nocturia. OAB has a negative impact on women’s social, physical, and psychological wellbeing. Initial treatment includes lifestyle modifications, bladder retraining, pelvic floor exercises and pharmacological therapy. However, these measures are unsuccessful in 25–40% of women (refractory OAB). Before considering invasive treatments, such as Botulinum toxin injection or sacral neuromodulation, most guidelines recommend urodynamics to confirm diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). However, urodynamics may fail to show evidence of DO in up to 45% of cases, hence the need to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. FUTURE (Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation) aims to test the hypothesis that, in women with refractory OAB, urodynamics and comprehensive clinical assessment is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes following treatment and is more cost-effective, compared to comprehensive clinical assessment only.
Methods
FUTURE is a pragmatic, multi-centre, superiority randomised controlled trial. Women aged ≥ 18 years with refractory OAB or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, and who have failed/not tolerated conservative and medical treatment, are considered for trial entry. We aim to recruit 1096 women from approximately 60 secondary/tertiary care hospitals across the UK. All consenting women will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 15 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is participant-reported success at 15 months post-randomisation measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 15 months. The secondary outcomes include adverse events, impact on other urinary symptoms and health-related quality of life. Qualitative interviews with participants and clinicians and a health economic evaluation will also be conducted. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be by intention-to-treat. Results will be presented as estimates and 95% CIs.
Discussion
The FUTURE study will inform patients, clinicians and policy makers whether routine urodynamics improves treatment outcomes in women with refractory OAB and whether it is cost-effective.
Trial registration
ISRCTN63268739. Registered on 14 September 2017.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, Division of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK (GRID:grid.7107.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7291)
2 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Urology, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.31410.37) (ISNI:0000 0000 9422 8284)
3 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Department of Urogynaecology, Glasgow, UK (GRID:grid.413301.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0523 9342)
4 University of Sheffield, Health Economics and Decision Science, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262)
5 North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.418484.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0380 7221); University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.6518.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2034 5266)
6 Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Warrell Unit, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.498924.a)
7 North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.418484.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0380 7221); University of Bristol, Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)
8 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gynaecology, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.430506.4)
9 Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gynaecology, Newcastle, UK (GRID:grid.420004.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0444 2244)
10 North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.418484.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0380 7221)
11 Bladder Health UK, Registered charity, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.7107.1)
12 University of Aberdeen, Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Aberdeen, UK (GRID:grid.7107.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7291)
13 Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)




