Abstract
Mammals harbor diverse gut microbiomes (GMs) that perform critical functions for host health and fitness. Identifying factors associated with GM variation can help illuminate the role of microbial symbionts in mediating host ecological interactions and evolutionary processes, including diversification and adaptation. Many mammals demonstrate phylosymbiosis—a pattern in which more closely-related species harbor more similar GMs—while others show overwhelming influences of diet and habitat. Here, we generated 16S rRNA sequence data from fecal samples of 15 species of wild lemurs across southern Madagascar to (1) test a hypothesis of phylosymbiosis, and (2) test trait correlations between dietary guild, habitat, and GM diversity. Our results provide strong evidence of phylosymbiosis, though some closely-related species with substantial ecological niche overlap exhibited greater GM similarity than expected under Brownian motion. Phylogenetic regressions also showed a significant correlation between dietary guild and UniFrac diversity, but not Bray-Curtis or Jaccard. This discrepancy between beta diversity metrics suggests that older microbial clades have stronger associations with diet than younger clades, as UniFrac weights older clades more heavily. We conclude that GM diversity is predominantly shaped by host phylogeny, and that microbes associated with diet were likely acquired before evolutionary radiations within the lemur families examined.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Kentucky, Department of Biology, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438)
2 Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, New York, USA (GRID:grid.36425.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2216 9681)
3 Centre ValBio Research Station, Ranomafana, Madagascar (GRID:grid.266539.d)
4 Université Antananarivo, Anthropobiologie et Développement Durable, Antananarivo, Madagascar (GRID:grid.440419.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2165 5629)
5 University of Kentucky, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Lexington, USA (GRID:grid.266539.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8438)
6 Centre ValBio Research Station, Ranomafana, Madagascar (GRID:grid.266539.d); Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, Department of Anthropology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.36425.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2216 9681)





