Abstract
Marine sediment communities are major contributors to biogeochemical cycling and benthic ecosystem functioning, but they are poorly described, particularly in remote regions such as Antarctica. We analysed patterns and drivers of diversity in metazoan and prokaryotic benthic communities of the Antarctic Peninsula with metabarcoding approaches. Our results show that the combined use of mitochondrial Cox1, and 16S and 18S rRNA gene regions recovered more phyla, from metazoan to non-metazoan groups, and allowed correlation of possible interactions between kingdoms. This higher level of detection revealed dominance by the arthropods and not nematodes in the Antarctic benthos and further eukaryotic diversity was dominated by benthic protists: the world’s largest reservoir of marine diversity. The bacterial family Woeseiaceae was described for the first time in Antarctic sediments. Almost 50% of bacteria and 70% metazoan taxa were unique to each sampled site (high alpha diversity) and harboured unique features for local adaptation (niche-driven). The main abiotic drivers measured, shaping community structure were sediment organic matter, water content and mud. Biotic factors included the nematodes and the highly abundant bacterial fraction, placing protists as a possible bridge for between kingdom interactions. Meiofauna are proposed as sentinels for identifying anthropogenic-induced changes in Antarctic marine sediments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Kirse, A. 2
; Giebner, H. 2 ; Vause, B. J. 3 ; Drago, T. 4
; Power, D. M. 5 ; Peck, L. S. 3 ; Clark, M. S. 3 1 Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK (GRID:grid.14332.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 0746 0155)
2 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.452935.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2216 5875)
3 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.478592.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0598 3800)
4 Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), Tavira, Portugal (GRID:grid.478592.5); Institute Dom Luiz (IDL), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263)
5 Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Faro, Portugal (GRID:grid.7157.4) (ISNI:0000 0000 9693 350X)





