It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
An accurate estimator of the real-time fatality rate is warranted to monitor the progress of ongoing epidemics, hence facilitating the policy-making process. However, most of the existing estimators fail to capture the time-varying nature of the fatality rate and are often biased in practice. A simple real-time fatality rate estimator with adjustment for reporting delays is proposed in this paper using the fused lasso technique. This approach is easy to use and can be broadly applied to public health practice as only basic epidemiological data are required. A large-scale simulation study suggests that the proposed estimator is a reliable benchmark for formulating public health policies during an epidemic with high accuracy and sensitivity in capturing the changes in the fatality rate over time, while the other two commonly-used case fatality rate estimators may convey delayed or even misleading signals of the true situation. The application to the COVID-19 data in Germany between January 2020 and January 2022 demonstrates the importance of the social restrictions in the early phase of the pandemic when vaccines were not available, and the beneficial effects of vaccination in suppressing the fatality rate to a low level since August 2021 irrespective of the rebound in infections driven by the more infectious Delta and Omicron variants during the fourth wave.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The University of Hong Kong, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757); Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.411846.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0685 868X)
2 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123)
3 The University of Hong Kong, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757); Duke-NUS Medical School, Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.428397.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0385 0924)