It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The hippocampus has been a focus of memory research since H.M’s surgery abolished his ability to form new memories, yet its mechanistic role in memory remains debated. Here, we identify a candidate memory mechanism: an anticipatory hippocampal “convergence state”, observed while awaiting valuable information, and which predicts subsequent learning. During fMRI, participants viewed trivia questions eliciting high or low curiosity, followed seconds later by its answer. We reasoned that encoding success requires a confluence of conditions, so that hippocampal states more conducive to memory formation should converge in state space. To operationalize convergence of neural states, we quantified the typicality of multivoxel patterns in the medial temporal lobes during anticipation and encoding of trivia answers. We found that the typicality of anticipatory hippocampal patterns increased during high curiosity. Crucially, anticipatory hippocampal pattern typicality increased with dopaminergic midbrain activation and uniquely accounted for the association between midbrain activation and subsequent recall. We propose that hippocampal convergence states may complete a cascade from motivation and midbrain activation to memory enhancement, and may be a general predictor of memory formation.
Motivational states play a key role in memory formation. Here, the authors show that curiosity engages reward circuitry to promote a hippocampal state conducive to the formation of new memories.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Duke University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
2 Duke University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); Duke University, Department of Neurobiology, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); Boston University, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.189504.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7558)
3 Duke University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); Duke University, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
4 Duke University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); Duke University, Department of Neurobiology, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); Duke University, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); Duke University, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)