Abstract
Background
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical disorders and the incidence is rising. The routine treatment is neurosurgical hematoma evacuation, which is associated with recurrence rates up to 10–25%. In recent years, endovascular embolization of the middle meningeal artery (eMMA) has garnered much attention due to recurrence rates as low as < 5%. Several randomized controlled trials are planned or ongoing. In most of these trials, conventional neurosurgical treatment with or without adjunctive endovascular embolization is compared. The proposed trial aims to conduct a head-to-head comparison between neurosurgical and endovascular treatment as stand-alone treatments.
Methods
The trial is academically driven and funded within existing public healthcare systems and infrastructure. Patients with uni- or bilateral cSDH, presenting with mild-to moderate symptoms, and admitted to neurosurgery on clinical grounds will be offered participation. Subjects are randomized 1:1 between conventional neurosurgical treatment (control) and endovascular embolization of the middle meningeal artery (intervention). Primary endpoint is reoperation due to clinically and/or radiologically significant recurrence within 3 months. Secondary endpoints include safety, technical success rate, neurological disability, and quality of life.
Discussion
There are mounting retrospective data suggesting eMMA, as sole treatment or as an adjunctive to neurosurgery for cSDH, is safe and effective with a reoperation rate lower than neurosurgical hematoma evacuation alone. If randomized controlled trials confirm these findings, there is a potential for a paradigm shift in the treatment of cSDH where a minimally invasive procedure can replace open surgery in a large and oftentimes old and fragile patient cohort.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05267184. Registered March 4, 2022.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Ullberg, Teresa 2 ; Nittby, Henrietta 3 ; Marklund, Niklas 3 ; Wassélius, Johan 1 1 Skåne University Hospital, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.411843.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0623 9987); Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
2 Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Skåne University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.411843.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0623 9987)
3 Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Skåne University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.411843.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0623 9987)




