1. Introduction
As one of the most widespread and deadly cancers in the world, gastric cancer (GC) has some of the highest incidence (5.7%) and mortality (8.2%) rates [1]. Due to advances in diagnosis and comprehensive treatment, the survival rates were significantly enhanced in GC patients [2]. However, the prognosis for advanced GC patients is still rather poor, even after the application of targeted drugs or immunotherapy [3]. Therefore, the unraveling of the molecular mechanisms contributing to GC is a very important issue for us since acquaintance with these mechanisms will enable us to devise novel treatment strategies and, thus, improve the survival of GC patients.
Belonging to the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) messenger RNA (mRNA)-binding protein family, IGF2BP2 is involved in modulating the localization, stability, and translation of bound mRNAs [4,5]. In some previous studies, IGF2BP2 was reported to encourage the progression of a few malignant tumors, such as breast tumors [6], non-small-cell lung tumors [7], and bowel cancer [8,9]. Furthermore, IGF2BP2 has been repeatedly reported by previously published studies to play roles as an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) reader [10]. In an IGF2BP2-dependent manner, METTL3 increases the progression of colorectal cancer [11]. In pancreatic cancer, IGF2BP2 facilitates cancer occurrence and promotes stem-cell-like properties by regulating DANCR as an m6A reader [12]. However, studies on the role of IGF2BP2 in GC are few. Su Y et al. suggested that the level of IGF2BP2 in GC tissues and the frequency of autoantibodies with IGF2BP2 in sera were separately associated with cell differentiation and tumor metastasis [13]. It was then shown by Liu X et al. that polymorphisms of IGF2BP2 might independently predict the responses of patients with metastatic GC to chemotherapy [14]. Additionally, it was demonstrated by Meistere et al. that, compared with healthy controls, IGF2BP2 predominantly reacted with the sera of GC patients [15]. Thus, given the conclusions of these studies, it could be inferred that IGF2BP2 might be associated with the occurrence and progression of GC. However, its specific effects on GC and the molecular mechanisms through which it contributes to GC need to be further elucidated.
High-mobility group A1 (HMGA1) is a member of nonhistone chromatin proteins and is widely present in eukaryotic cells [16]. HMGA1 regulates transcription by altering the structure of chromatin, thereby regulating a variety of biological events, such as proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [17]. Studies have shown that HMGA1 is upregulated in various tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer, colon cancer, and breast cancer [18]. As an architectural transcriptional factor, HMGA1 binds to the promoters of the EMT-related genes E-cadherin, vimentin, and Twist1 and modulates their transcription [19]. In colorectal cancer, the LINC00460/DHX9/IGF2BP2 complex promotes proliferation and differentiation by stabilizing HMGA1 mRNA, depending on m6A modification [20]. HMGA1 is also upregulated in GC tissues and predicts poor prognosis; the overexpression of HMGA1 could improve the proliferation and migration abilities of GC cells [21,22]. However, its specific regulation mechanism is still unclear.
As the initial stage of the carcinoma metastatic cascade, the activation of EMT can provide tumor cells with the ability to migrate and invade before they spread from the primary lesion into the circulation [23]. EMT is a highly complex and dynamic process in which the epithelial features of tumor cells (including stable epithelial cell-cell junctions, apical-basal polarity, and interactions with basement membrane) are suppressed by gene expression changes and post-translational regulatory mechanisms, with obtaining mesenchymal features [24]. E-Cadherin is essential for maintaining the epithelial phenotype. During the EMT process of GC, the E-cadherin expression of GC cells is lost, but abundant mesenchymal markers such as N-cadherin and Vimentin are expressed [25]. Furthermore, several key transcription factors (including Snail and ZEB) repress E-Cadherin expression through target E-box in the E-cadherin promoter [26]. EMT is a key progression step associated with poor prognosis of GC. Therefore, it is necessary to have a better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of EMT during GC metastasis so as to promote the development of new therapeutic strategies.
In this project, by analyzing data from public databases and performing the immunohistochemical staining of clinical specimens, the level of IGF2BP2 was verified to be remarkably improved in gastric cancer tissues, and its overexpression predicted worse survival for GC patients. It was then demonstrated by functional analyses that IGF2BP2 promoted both in vivo and in vitro metastases of GC cells. Furthermore, it was verified through mechanistic studies that it was by directly interacting with HMGA1 mRNA and increasing its stability that IGF2BP2 facilitated the ability of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in GC cell lines. Given these results of our study, IGF2BP2 could be a potential biomarker with prognostic and therapeutic value in GC.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bioinformatics Analysis
The RNASeq data in GC were initially acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (
2.2. Clinical Samples
In total, 173 cases from 2004 to 2007 were randomly chosen among GC patients having undergone curative surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (FAHSYSU). Clinical follow-ups of these 173 patients were terminated on 30 June 2018. These 173 GC patients did not receive neoadjuvant therapies. The staging of tumors in these 173 patients was reassessed based on the eighth version of the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) TNM classifications. Informed consent in written form was acquired from each individual inpatient. Consent to conduct the present research was granted by the Ethics Committee of FAHSYSU.
2.3. Cell Lines and Cell Culture
GC cell lines, such as AGS, SGC7901, and MKN28, studied in this research were obtained from the Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). AGS cells were kept in DMEM/F-12 (Gibco, Logan, UT, USA), while SGC7901 and MKN28 were maintained with RPMI 1640 Medium (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco) at a temperature of 37 °C and in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
2.4. Transfection and Stable Cell Lines Construction
Through synthesizing and cloning IGF2BP2 ORF and lentiviral negative control sequence into the lentiviral plasmid pEZ-Lv201 (Genecopeia, Guangzhou, China), we established stable IGF2BP2 overexpression, and control cell lines were called EX-H1849-Lv201 and EX-NEG-Lv201, respectively, which were then transfected into AGS and SGC7901 cells. Seventy-two hours later, stable cell lines were constructed over 4 weeks; the cells were cultured in a puromycin-added medium. In order to establish IGF2BP2-knockdown cell lines, we cloned oligonucleotides encoding short hairpin RNA (shRNA) into lentiviral vector psi-LVRU6GP (Genecopeia), which were named sh-1 and sh-2, respectively. The negative control utilized in this study was a scrambled shRNA named sh-Ctrl. Sequences of sh-1, sh-2, and sh-Ctrl were as follows: GGAAGTTGATTACTCAGTCTC, GGACCAAGATAACAATCTCAT, and ACAGAAGCGATTGTTGATC. After being transfected with sh-RNAs (sh-1, sh-2, or sh-Ctrl), stable cell lines were established over 4 weeks; GC cells were cultured in a puromycin-supplemented medium (2 μg/mL puromycin). To construct GC cells in which HMGA1 was overexpressed, we then transfected HMGA1-overexpression-promoting plasmid (GV-HMGA1) and negative-control plasmid (GV-Vector) into GC cells with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), while the GV492 used as the carrier was devised and completed by GeneChem (Shanghai, China).
2.5. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR
Using AG RNAex Pro Reagent (Accurate Biology, Changsha, China) and Evo M-MLV RT Premix Kit (Accurate Biology), the total RNA was extracted following the protocol obtained from the manufacturer and was reverse-transcribed into cDNA subsequently. Following the manufacturer’s protocols, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays were performed on CFX96 Touch Deep Well Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Guangzhou, China), with SYBR® Green Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit (Accurate Biology). The primers were as follows: GAPDH, forward sequence 5′-ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAG-3′ and reverse sequence 5′-GCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC-3′; IGF2BP2, forward sequence 5′-AGCTAAGCGGGCAT-3′ and reverse sequence 5′-CCGCAGCGGGAAATCAATCT-3′; and HMGA1 forward sequence 5′-AGCGAAGTGCCAACACCTA-3′ and reverse sequence 5′-TGGTGGTTTTCCGGGTCTTG-3′.
2.6. Western Blot
GC cell lines were lysed by RIPA, a buffer incorporating phosphatase and protease inhibitor reagents (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), for extracting total protein, which was then measured by BCA assay. Proteins were shifted into PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) after the same amount of these resolved in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Subsequently, these PVDF membranes were incubated in a 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution at about 25 °C for more than 1 h. Next, these membranes were immunoblotted with each primary antibody at a temperature of 4 °C for one night. The next day, the PVDF membranes were washed three times before incubation in a buffer including HRP-conjugated affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG (SA00001-2, Proteintech, Wuhan, China) at about 25 °C for more than 1 h. Next, these PVDF membranes covered with antibody-conjugated protein bands were washed with TBST buffer for at least 20 min, which was followed by detection with a BeyoECL Plus Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). Antibodies such as anti-GADPH (10494-1-AP), anti-IGF2BP2 antibody (11601-1-AP), anti-ZEB1 antibody (21544-1-AP), anti-Vimentin antibody (10366-1-AP), anti-SNAI1 antibody (13099-1-AP) and anti-N-cadherin antibody (22018-1-AP), as well as an anti-E-cadherin antibody (20874-1-AP), were obtained from Proteintech, while anti-HMGA1 antibody (AF5218) was produced by Affinity Biosciences (Changzhou, China).
The expression level of GADPH was used as the basis of calculation.
2.7. Cell-Function Assays
Transwell assays were designed to determine the influence of IGF2BP2 on the migration and invasion in GC cell lines. Regarding migration assay, on the upper chamber, 5 × 104 cells were cultured in serum-free medium (8-μm pore size, Corning, NY, USA), while there was a 10% FBS-contained medium in the lower chamber. For invasion assay, the same amounts of cells were cultured on the upper insert covered with 10% Matrigel (Corning). The incubation time for SGC7901 and MKN28 cells was 48 h, but 24 h for AGS cells. After incubation, cells remaining in the upper chamber were wiped off using swabs. Next, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and dyed with 0.1% crystal violet after passing through the membrane. Five different fields of view under the microscope were used to count the cells that migrated into or invaded the lower chamber. All cell-function experiments in this study were repeated at least three times.
2.8. RNA Immunoprecipitation
According to the protocol provided by the manufacturer, EZ-Magna RIP RNA Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (17-700, Millipore) was used to perform RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments. RNA binding proteins for IGF2BP2 were immunoprecipitated using anti-IGF2BP2 antibody and IgG. To quantify the enrichment of RNA bound to IGF2BP2, we then performed RT-PCR analyses with these identified RNAs as substrates, the products of which were then detected through 3% agarose gel electrophoresis.
2.9. RNA Stability Assays
GC cell lines were processed using 2.5 μg/mL actinomycin D (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China) for 0, 8, and 16 h, respectively. Next, total RNA was isolated from these actinomycin-D-processed cells with AG RNAex Pro Reagent and analyzed by RT-PCR with GAPDH as the normalization. Finally, the half-lives of mRNA were detected by linear regression analysis.
2.10. Animal Studies
Five-week-old female BALB/c nude mice were used to construct an animal model to evaluate the effects of IGF2BP2 expression on GC in vivo. For an in vivo metastasis model, 2 × 106 SGC7901 cells in which IGF2BP2 were stably overexpressed or control SGC7901 cell lines were injected into the tail vein. After 7 weeks, all these mice were killed, and metastatic lung lesions were removed and examined by immunohistochemical (IHC) and HE staining. All these assays were permitted and supervised through the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Ruiye Model Animal (Guangzhou, China) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (approval no. 20201010001).
2.11. Immunohistochemical Staining
Paraffin-embedded specimens of 173 GC patients were retrieved from the Department of Pathology, FAHSYSU. All animal specimens were immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. According to the protocols provided by the manufacturer, we performed IHC staining utilizing these fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues with an Immunohistochemistry Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Expression levels of IGF2BP2 in these tissues were determined in a semiquantitative manner [12]. The total score of each patient was measured by multiplying the staining intensity and staining area. Staining-intensity score in this study was defined based on the following criteria: 0 (negative staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), and 3 (strong staining), while the score for staining area was calculated as follows: 0 (0%), 1 (1–10%), 2 (10–50%), and 3 (51–100%).
2.12. Statistical Analysis
For continuous variables, the comparisons were accomplished by student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA, and categorical instances were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square test. Kaplan–Meier curves of the included patients were constructed and compared by log-rank test. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated by Cox regression analysis. All the statistical analyses included in this research were performed by SPSS (version 17.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), and a p-value was considered statistically significant when less than 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Increased Expression of IGF2BP2 Was Significantly Correlated with Worse Survival in GC Patients
Firstly, the expressions of IGF2BP2 in the GC tissues were evaluated by analyzing relevant data from TCGA, revealing that compared to normal gastric tissues, the expression levels of IGF2BP2 in GC tissues were significantly higher (Figure 1A,B). Secondly, in order to affirm the higher expression levels of IGF2BP2 in the GC tissues, the RT-PCR and Western blotting assays were performed using paired GC specimens obtained from FAHSYSU, revealing that in comparison with that in adjacent gastric tissues, the expression of IGF2BP2 was significantly enhanced at both mRNA (Figure 1C) and protein (Figure 1D) level. Thirdly, with the aim of further assessing the prognostic significance of IGF2BP2 overexpression, the data from the TCGA database were analyzed using an online Kaplan–Meier plotter. The results showed that the higher the mRNA level of the IGF2BP2, the worse the overall survival (OS) of the patients (Figure 1E). Fourthly, the Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the protein expression of IGF2BP2 and the patients by IHC staining. Based on the IHC staining of 173 tissues, we found that the IGF2BP2 protein was mainly located in the cytoplasm. (Figure 1F). In this study, we also revealed that elevated IGF2BP2 expression was significantly related to tumor size, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and depth of invasion (Table 1). Additionally, the patients with high expression levels of IGF2BP2 had worse OS and relapse-free survival (RFS), as revealed by the Kaplan–Meier curves in Figure 1G,H. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses also proved that a high expression level of IGF2BP2 is an independent predictor of OS and RFS, as demonstrated in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Combining the above results, we can conclude that the expression of IGF2BP2 in GC was significantly elevated and might be valued as a novel prognostic biomarker for patients diagnosed with GC.
3.2. In Vitro and In Vivo Metastasis of GC Is Promoted by IGF2BP2
In order to clarify/verify the biological functions of IGF2BP2 in GC, we subsequently established stable IGF2BP2-overexpressing GC cells (AGS and SGC7901) (Figure 2A–C). It was proven that both the migration and the invasion of AGS (Figure 2D) and SGC7901 (Figure 2E) were significantly enhanced by the upregulation of IGF2BP2 in Transwell assays. In addition to establishing stable IGF2BP2-overexpressing GC cells, we also established stable IGF2BP2 knockdown cell lines (Figure 2F). As expected, the knockdown of IGF2BP2 inhibited the migration and invasion of MKN28 (Figure 2G). Next, the effects of the IGF2BP2 expression level on the metastasis of GC cells in vivo were further assessed by animal experiments. IGF2BP2-overexpressing and corresponding control SGC7901 cells were injected through the tail vein. After being raised for seven weeks, the mice were euthanized, and lung tissues were collected, revealing that in comparison with the control groups, the number and size of both surface (Figure 2H) and coronal plane (Figure 2I) metastatic lesions were significantly obvious, which proved that the upregulation of IGF2BP2 significantly enhanced the lung metastasis of GC. Taking these results together, we drew the conclusion that IGF2BP2 played a critical role in promoting metastasis in GC.
3.3. IGF2BP2 Enhances HMGA1 mRNA Stability through Direct Interaction
To explore the molecular mechanisms through which IGF2BP2 promoted the metastasis of GC, we initially analyzed the genes that were co-expressed with IGF2BP2 by LinkedOmics. As shown in Figure 3A, many genes were demonstrated to be significantly associated with IGF2BP2 expression, and HMGA1 was found to be positively associated with IGF2BP2 expression, suggesting the potential positive regulatory mechanism of IGF2BP2 (Figure 3B).
In order to testify that the expression level of HMGA1 was regulated by IGF2BP2, we then performed RT-PCR and Western blotting analyses with MKN28, SGC7901, and AGS cells. The results showed that the overexpression of IGF2BP2 increased HMGA1 expression at mRNA and protein levels, while the downregulation of IGF2BP2 resulted in a decrease in the mRNA and protein level of HMGA1 at the same time (Figure 3C,D). As an RNA-binding protein, IGF2BP2 performs its biological functions by binding to targeted RNAs [4]. As an open-source online instrument studying the interactions of RBP-mRNA from CLIP-seq, we identified HMGA1 mRNA as a potential target of IGF2BP2 by ENCORI (
3.4. IGF2BP2/HMGA1 Axis Enhanced the Migration and Invasion Ability in GC Cells
Despite the fact that IGF2BP2 plays a vital role in encouraging metastasis in GC, it is still unclear whether the IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis is responsible. As mentioned above, we established stable IGF2BP2 knockdown and control MKN28 cells, into which the HMGA1 overexpression (GV-HMGA1) or control plasmid (GV-Vector) were transfected. The successful overexpression of HMGA1 in the IGF2BP2-knockdown MKN28 was confirmed through both qRT-PCR and Western blotting assays (Figure 4A,B). The decreased migration and invasion capability caused by the knockdown of IGF2BP2 was reversed by the ectopic expression of HMGA1 (Figure 4C). Considering all these findings, we drew the conclusion that the IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis was responsible for encouraging the migration and invasion of the GC cells.
3.5. IGF2BP2/HMGA1 Axis Promotes EMT of GC
Evidence supporting the conclusion that HMGA1 promoted the progression of GC by regulating EMT is continuously emerging [21]. Therefore, we further explored whether the IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis regulated EMT in GC. It was demonstrated by Western blotting analysis that in IGF2BP2-overexpressing AGS and SGC7901 cells, the increased expression level of HMGA1 resulted in the upregulation of N-cadherin, ZEB1, Vimentin, SNAI1, and the low expression of E-cadherin (Figure 5A). By contrast, in IGF2BP2-knockdown MKN28 cells, decreased HMGA1 was related to the downregulation of N-cadherin, ZEB1, Vimentin, SNAI1, and the higher expression of E-cadherin (Figure 5A). A similar result to that was observed in the GC cell lines was discovered in the lung-metastatic model. It was revealed by the immunohistochemical staining of the IGF2BP2-overexpressing or control lung-metastatic lesions that the increased expression of HMGA1 was related to the reduced expression of E-cadherin and the upregulation of N-cadherin (Figure 5B). All these findings suggested that EMT’s mediation by IGF2BP2 was attributable to the overexpression of HMGA1.
4. Discussion
IGF2BP2 has been reported by multiple previous studies to be related to the development and metastasis of some cancers [4]. Furthermore, IGF2BP2 has been shown to be associated with the metastasis of GC [13]. However, its specific functions in GC and the molecular mechanisms through which it contributes to GC progression were not previously explored. In this research, it was clarified that IGF2BP2 was significantly upregulated in GC and that its overexpression was related to poor survival in GC patients. Furthermore, IGF2BP2 was proven by both in vivo and in vitro assays to encourage GC metastasis. It was then demonstrated by subsequent experiments that IGF2BP2 encouraged GC metastasis by directly interacting with HMGA1 mRNA and increasing its expression, as did the increase in EMT by the IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis.
It has been reported that IGF2BP2 is associated with the development of glioblastoma [28], colorectal cancer [8], breast cancer [6], non-small-cell lung cancer [7], and pancreatic cancer [29]. However, studies on the roles of IGF2BP2 in GC are still scarce. Firstly, the data extracted from TCGA were analyzed, indicating that in comparison with normal gastric tissues, the expression levels of IGF2BP2 in GC were obviously upregulated, which matched the results of the RT-PCR and Western blotting analyses performed using the specimens from our center. Secondly, the prognostic significance of the IGF2BP2 expression level was evaluated by Kaplan–Meier analysis (online KaplanπMeier plotter), indicating that high expressions of IGF2BP2 resulted in worse OS in GC patients. The prognostic significance of IGF2BP2 expression was also evaluated by performing IHC staining with the 173 GC specimens and, subsequently, Kaplan–Meier analysis, demonstrating that the upregulated expression of IGF2BP2 was significantly related to worse OS and RFS. It was then proven that high IGF2BP2 expression was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS through Cox regression analysis. Combining these findings, we inferred that elevated IGF2BP2 expression could predict poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.
Metastasis is the leading factor contributing to poor long-term outcomes of patients diagnosed with cancers [30]. IGF2BP2 was reported by a previously published study to encourage the metastasis of colorectal cancer [11]. However, whether IGF2BP2 promotes GC metastasis remained ambiguous. Therefore, the effects of IGF2BP2 on GC metastasis were subsequently evaluated in vivo and in vitro. It was demonstrated through Transwell experiments that the upregulation of IGF2BP2 significantly increased the migration and invasion capabilities in the AGS and SGC7901 cell lines, while the capabilities were significantly weak in MNK28 after IGF2BP2 was down-regulated. Next, the in vivo effects of IGF2BP2 on GC metastasis were assessed by animal experiments, revealing that the upregulation of IGF2BP2 significantly facilitated lung metastasis in SGC7901 cells. Taking all these results into consideration, we concluded that aberrant IGF2BP2 expression could encourage GC metastasis.
As an RNA binding protein, IGF2BP2 performs biological functions by directly binding to the target RNA [4], such as IGF2 [31], LAMB2 [32], and UCP1 [33]. In order to identify the target mRNAs of IGF2BP2 in GC, we first determined genes that were associated with IGF2BP2 expression via LinkedOmics, revealing that HMGA1 was positively associated with IGF2BP2. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that in AGS, SGC7901, and MKN28, HMGA1 expression was positively regulated by IGF2BP2 through RT-PCR and Western blotting analyses. Next, through ENCORI, we demonstrated that HMGA1 was a potential target of IGF2BP2. In a study by Dai et al., it was proven that IGF2BP2 is bound to HMGA1 mRNA in MEFs and RD cells [34]. However, whether the interaction between IGF2BP2 and mRNA described by Dai et al. was involved in GC was still unknown. In our study, the results of the RIP assays revealed that the direct interaction between HMGA1 mRNA and IGF2BP2 was involved in GC. Next, we evaluated the effect of IGF2BP2 on the stability of HMGA1 mRNA by RNA decay assays. We found that IGF2BP2 sustained the HMGA1 mRNA stability and prevented it from being degraded. IGF2BP2 was confirmed as an m6A reader in a study by H. Huang et al. [10]. Similarly, as an m6A reader, IGF2BP2 promoted stemness-like characteristics and pathogenesis in pancreatic cancer by stabilizing DANCR mRNA [12]. The study on colorectal cancer revealed that LncRNA LINRIS enhanced the stability of IGF2BP2, which increased the binding of IGF2BP2 to m6A-modified MYC [35]. Recent studies showed that IGF2BP2 promotes GC progression by targeting IGF1R and SIRT1 mRNAs and found that there are m6A modification sites on IGF1R and SIRT1 genes through bioinformatics analysis, so it is speculated that this promotion of IGF2BP2 may be mediated through m6A modification [36,37]. However, it is still unknown whether an m6A modification on HMGA1 mRNA was absolutely necessary for IGF2BP2 to regulate its expression. It was demonstrated by analyzing the m6A-sequencing data from METTL3 knockdown and control AGS cells that HMGA1 did not belong to the differentially expressed genes modified by m6A. This was also reported in a study by Yue et al. [25], suggesting that IGF2BP2 might modulate HMGA1 expression in a manner independent of m6A modification. The roles played by IGF2BP2 that are dependent on m6A modification in GC still need to be validated by more studies.
To confirm that IGF2BP2′s role in encouraging GC metastasis is attributable to the IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis, we then performed rescue assays, the results of which demonstrated that IGF2BP2 promoted GC metastasis by increasing HMGA1 expression. As is commonly known, EMT is responsible for the initial stage of cancer metastasis [38]. Furthermore, HMGA1 could promote GC progression through EMT [21]. Therefore, we hypothesized that IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis promoted EMT in GC. This was confirmed by subsequent experiments. It was revealed in Western blotting analyses that in IGF2BP2-overexpressing AGS and SGC7901 cells, the upregulation of HMGA1 led to the increased expression of N-cadherin, ZEB1, Vimentin, SNAI1, and the low expression of E-cadherin; the opposite was observed in the MKN28 cell lines when IGF2BP2 was knocked down. Similar effects were confirmed by the IHC staining of lung-metastatic lesions. These results suggested that IGF2BP2 accelerated EMT in GC by increasing the expression of HMGA1.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, our findings reveal that IGF2BP2 accelerates EMT and metastasis in GC by increasing HMGA1 mRNA stability. Furthermore, the expression level of IGF2BP2 is distinctly higher in GC tissues and is correlated with poor survival in GC patients, showing its value as a new prognostic and therapeutic marker for GC.
Conceptualization, J.O., C.Z. and Y.H.; data curation, D.L., T.H. and Y.X.; formal analysis, J.L. and J.J.; methodology, J.O., J.L., D.L. and J.J.; project administration, C.Z. and Y.H.; resources, C.Z. and Y.H.; software, J.O. and J.L.; supervision, J.O. and J.L.; validation, X.L.; visualization, J.O. and J.L.; writing—original draft, J.O.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, approved the use of human specimens. Informed consent in written form was acquired from individual patients. Animal experiments were permitted and supervised through the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Ruiye Model Animal (Guangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (approval no. 20201010001; approval date: 13 October 2020).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study, and written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.
The data contained in this research are available if requested. The publicly available data used in this research were acquired from the following databases: TCGA database (
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. The expression of IGF2BP2 in GC tissues is remarkably upregulated, which predicts poor survival in GC patients. (A,B) The data from the TCGA database show the expression levels of IGF2BP2 in unpaired or paired GC and normal gastric tissues. (C) Expression levels of IGF2BP2 in paired GC and normal gastric tissues detected RT-PCR. (D) Representative results of the IGF2BP2 protein upregulation in GC specimens determined by Western blotting. (E) The correlation of high or low IGF2BP2 expression with the overall survival of GC patients according to the Kaplan–Meier plotter database. (F) Representative results of immunohistochemical staining of IGF2BP2 in GC specimens (200×). (G,H) The expression of IGF2BP2 upregulation was obviously related to poor overall survival and relapse-free survival in GC patients through Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Molecular weights for proteins are shown in the uncropped Western blot images (Figure S1).
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. IGF2BP2 promotes in vivo and in vitro metastasis of GC cells. (A) The mRNA and protein levels of IGF2BP2 in GC cell lines. (B,C) Western blotting and RT-PCR were performed to confirm the stable IGF2BP2-overexpressing AGS and SGC7901 cells were constructed successfully. (D,E) The migration and invasion capability of AGS and SGC7901 cells were significantly increased by the upregulation of IGF2BP2. (F) Western blotting and RT-PCR were performed to confirm the stable IGF2BP2 knockdown MKN28 cells were constructed successfully. (G) Migration and invasion capabilities of MKN28 were significantly inhibited by the knocking down of IGF2BP2. (H) Representative images and quantification of metastatic lung tumors after IGF2BP2-overexpression or control SGC7901 cells were injected. (I) Representative images depicting lung-tumor l metastasis through HE staining. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Molecular weights for proteins are shown in the uncropped Western blot images (Figures S2–S5).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. IGF2BP2 interacts with HMGA1 mRNA directly and enhances its stability. (A) Volcano plot illustrating the correlation between IGF2BP2 and other genes according to LinkedOmics database. (B) Correlation analysis of IGF2BP2 and HMGA1 according to LinkedOmics database. (C,D) The mRNA and protein levels of HMGA1 were upregulated by IGF2BP2 overexpression and downregulated by the knocking down of IGF2BP2. (E) It was proven by agarose electrophoresis and RT-PCR analysis of RIP assays that direct interactions took place between IGF2BP2 and HMGA1 mRNA in GC cells. (F) After actinomycin D (2.5 μg/mL) treatment of AGS, SGC7901, and MKN28 cells, the decay rates of mRNA of HMGA1 at certain times were analyzed by RT-PCR. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Molecular weights for proteins are shown in the uncropped Western blot images (Figures S6–S8).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis encourages migration and invasion capability in GC cell lines. (A,B) HMGA1 overexpression in MKN28 cells, in which IGF2BP2 knockdown was confirmed by Western blotting and RT-PCT analysis. (C) The migration and invasion capability in MKN28 GC cells reduced by knocking down of IGF2BP2 were rescued by HMGA1 overexpression. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Molecular weights for proteins are shown in the uncropped Western blot images (Figure S9).
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. IGF2BP2/HMGA1 axis promotes EMT of GC. (A) The amounts of HMGA1, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, ZEB1, Vimentin, and SNAI1 and in AGS, SGC7901, and MKN28 cells in which IGF2BP2 was overexpressed or knocked down were evaluated by Western blotting analyses. (B) Immunohistochemical staining was completed to evaluate the amounts of HMGA1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in metastatic lung lesions removed from mice injected with IGF2BP2-overexpressing or control SGC7901 cells. Molecular weights for proteins are shown in the uncropped Western blot images (Figure S10).
Correlations between IGF2BP2 expression and clinicopathologic parameters of 173 GC patients.
| Characteristics | No. | IGF2BP2 Expression | χ2 | p | ρ † | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (N = 81) | High (N = 92) | ||||||
| Age | 52.44 ± 11.98 | 58.38 ± 12.57 | |||||
| <60 y | 103 | 60 | 43 | 13.36 | 0.000 *** | 0.278 | 0.000 *** |
| ≥60 y | 70 | 21 | 49 | ||||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 116 | 54 | 62 | 0.01 | 0.919 | −0.008 | 0.920 |
| Female | 57 | 27 | 30 | ||||
| Tumor location | |||||||
| Proximal | 41 | 17 | 24 | 1.843 | 0.606 | 0.003 | 0.967 |
| Middle | 41 | 22 | 19 | ||||
| Distal | 75 | 36 | 39 | ||||
| More than 2 | 16 | 6 | 10 | ||||
| Tumor size | |||||||
| <5 cm | 71 | 40 | 31 | 4.381 | 0.036 | 0.159 | 0.037 * |
| ≥5 cm | 102 | 41 | 61 | ||||
| Histologic type | |||||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 151 | 71 | 80 | 1.410 | 0.842 | 0.014 | 0.859 |
| Squamous | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Signet ring | 11 | 5 | 6 | ||||
| Mucinous | 7 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Undifferentiated | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Borrmann classification | |||||||
| Ⅰ | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6.169 | 0.104 | 0.170 | 0.026 * |
| Ⅱ | 40 | 24 | 16 | ||||
| Ⅲ | 102 | 46 | 56 | ||||
| Ⅳ | 19 | 5 | 14 | ||||
| Differentiation | |||||||
| High | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.621 | 0.733 | −0.056 | 0.464 |
| Moderate | 41 | 17 | 24 | ||||
| Poor | 130 | 63 | 67 | ||||
| Depth of invasion | |||||||
| T1 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 5.283 | 0.152 | 0.160 | 0.035 * |
| T2 | 21 | 11 | 10 | ||||
| T3 | 98 | 44 | 54 | ||||
| T4 | 35 | 13 | 22 | ||||
| Lymph-node metastasis | |||||||
| N0 | 48 | 31 | 17 | 8.533 | 0.036 * | 0.191 | 0.012 * |
| N1 | 73 | 30 | 43 | ||||
| N2 | 32 | 12 | 20 | ||||
| N3 | 20 | 8 | 12 | ||||
| Distant metastases | |||||||
| M0 | 131 | 66 | 65 | 2.748 | 0.097 | 0.126 | 0.098 |
| M1 | 42 | 15 | 27 | ||||
| AJCC pTNM | |||||||
| Ⅰ | 33 | 22 | 11 | 7.451 | 0.059 | 0.184 | 0.015 * |
| Ⅱ | 62 | 28 | 34 | ||||
| Ⅲ | 36 | 16 | 20 | ||||
| Ⅳ | 42 | 15 | 27 | ||||
ρ †, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Overall survival analyzed through Cox proportional-hazard regression.
| Characteristic | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | HR | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | p | HR | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Gender | 0.025 * | 1.512 | 1.054 | 2.168 | 0.020 * | 1.571 | 1.073 | 2.300 |
| Age | 0.399 | 1.163 | 0.820 | 1.649 | ||||
| Tumor location | 0.662 | 1.046 | 0.855 | 1.280 | ||||
| Tumor size | 0.009 ** | 1.623 | 1.127 | 2.339 | ||||
| Histologic type | 0.423 | 1.069 | 0.908 | 1.258 | ||||
| Borrmann classification | 1.89 × 10−4 *** | 1.680 | 1.275 | 2.213 | ||||
| Differentiation | 0.662 | 1.087 | 0.747 | 1.582 | ||||
| Depth of invasion | 5.46 × 10−6 *** | 1.633 | 1.314 | 2.029 | ||||
| Lymph-node metastasis | 5.67 × 10−9 *** | 1.677 | 1.404 | 2.003 | ||||
| Distant metastases | 4.58 × 10−15 *** | 4.776 | 3.188 | 7.156 | 0.015 * | 3.051 | 1.247 | 7.462 |
| AJCC pTNM | 2.05 × 10−14 *** | 2.051 | 1.699 | 2.477 | ||||
| IGF2BP2 expression | 1.46 × 10−6 *** | 2.406 | 1.672 | 3.462 | 1.90 × 10−4 *** | 2.155 | 1.466 | 3.169 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Relapse-free survival analyzed using Cox proportional-hazard regression.
| Characteristic | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | HR | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | p | HR | 95.0% CI for Exp (B) | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Gender | 0.010 * | 1.598 | 1.117 | 2.286 | ||||
| Age | 0.530 | 1.118 | 0.789 | 1.585 | ||||
| Tumor location | 0.550 | 1.063 | 0.869 | 1.301 | ||||
| Tumor size | 0.014 * | 1.578 | 1.098 | 2.267 | ||||
| Histologic type | 0.415 | 1.071 | 0.909 | 1.262 | ||||
| Bornmann classification | 1.95 × 10−4 *** | 1.683 | 1.277 | 2.220 | 0.006 ** | 1.775 | 1.181 | 2.667 |
| Differentiation | 0.580 | 1.112 | 0.764 | 1.618 | ||||
| Depth of invasion | 1.07 × 10−5 *** | 1.601 | 1.291 | 1.985 | ||||
| Lymph-node metastasis | 9.59 × 10−9 *** | 1.658 | 1.390 | 1.978 | ||||
| AJCC pTNM | 5.54 × 10−14 *** | 1.680 | 1.258 | 2.245 | ||||
| IGF2BP2 expression | 3.14 × 10−6 *** | 2.323 | 1.618 | 3.333 | 0.003 ** | 2.009 | 1.268 | 3.184 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin.; 2018; 68, pp. 394-424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207593]
2. Bertuccio, P.; Chatenoud, L.; Levi, F.; Praud, D.; Ferlay, J.; Negri, E.; Malvezzi, M.; La Vecchia, C. Recent patterns in gastric cancer: A global overview. Int. J. Cancer; 2009; 125, pp. 666-673. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24290] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19382179]
3. Vrána, D.; Matzenauer, M.; Neoral, Č.; Aujeský, R.; Vrba, R.; Melichar, B.; Rušarová, N.; Bartoušková, M.; Jankowski, J. From Tumor Immunology to Immunotherapy in Gastric and Esophageal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2018; 20, 13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577521]
4. Cao, J.; Mu, Q.; Huang, H. The Roles of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 mRNA-Binding Protein 2 in Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells. Stem Cells Int.; 2018; 2018, 4217259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4217259] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736175]
5. Bell, J.L.; Wächter, K.; Mühleck, B.; Pazaitis, N.; Köhn, M.; Lederer, M.; Hüttelmaier, S. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): Post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression?. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.; 2013; 70, pp. 2657-2675. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1186-z]
6. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Lu, H. miR-1193 Suppresses Proliferation and Invasion of Human Breast Cancer Cells Through Directly Targeting IGF2BP2. Oncol. Res.; 2017; 25, pp. 579-585. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3727/97818823455816X14760504645779]
7. Huang, R.-S.; Zheng, Y.-L.; Li, C.; Ding, C.; Xu, C.; Zhao, J. MicroRNA-485-5p suppresses growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting IGF2BP2. Life Sci.; 2018; 199, pp. 104-111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.03.005]
8. Ye, S.; Song, W.; Xu, X.; Zhao, X.; Yang, L. IGF2BP2 promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation and survival through interfering with RAF-1 degradation by miR-195. FEBS Lett.; 2016; 590, pp. 1641-1650. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12205]
9. Wu, X.-L.; Lu, R.-Y.; Wang, L.-K.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Dai, Y.-J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Guo, F.; Xue, J.; Yang, D.-D. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR silencing inhibits invasion and proliferation of human colon cancer LoVo cells via regulating IGF2BP2. J. Cell. Biochem.; 2018; 12, pp. 1221-1231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27079]
10. Huang, H.; Weng, H.; Sun, W.; Qin, X.; Shi, H.; Wu, H.; Zhao, B.S.; Mesquita, A.; Liu, C.; Yuan, C.L. et al. Recognition of RNA N-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2018; 20, pp. 285-295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0045-z]
11. Li, T.; Hu, P.-S.; Zuo, Z.; Lin, J.-F.; Li, X.; Wu, Q.-N.; Chen, Z.-H.; Zeng, Z.-L.; Wang, F.; Zheng, J. et al. METTL3 facilitates tumor progression via an mA-IGF2BP2-dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma. Mol. Cancer; 2019; 18, 112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1038-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230592]
12. Hu, X.; Peng, W.-X.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, X.; Huang, D.; Mo, Y.-Y.; Yang, L. IGF2BP2 regulates DANCR by serving as an N6-methyladenosine reader. Cell Death Differ.; 2020; 27, pp. 1782-1794. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41418-019-0461-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31804607]
13. Su, Y.; Qian, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Shi, P.; Peng, X. The diversity expression of p62 in digestive system cancers. Clin. Immunol.; 2005; 116, pp. 118-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2005.04.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15886058]
14. Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, X.; Huang, M.; Wang, C.; Peng, W.; Yin, J.; Li, J.; He, G.; Li, X. et al. Effects of IGF2BP2, KCNQ1 and GCKR polymorphisms on clinical outcome in metastatic gastric cancer treated with EOF regimen. Pharmacogenomics; 2015; 16, pp. 959-970. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pgs.15.49]
15. Meistere, I.; Werner, S.; Zayakin, P.; Siliņa, K.; Rulle, U.; Pismennaja, A.; Šantare, D.; Kikuste, I.; Isajevs, S.; Leja, M. et al. The Prevalence of Cancer-Associated Autoantibodies in Patients with Gastric Cancer and Progressive Grades of Premalignant Lesions. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.; 2017; 26, pp. 1564-1574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0238]
16. Kwon, M.-Y.; Ghanta, S.; Ng, J.; Castano, A.P.; Han, J.; Ith, B.; Lederer, J.A.; El-Chemaly, S.; Chung, S.W.; Liu, X. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells expressing a dominant-negative high mobility group A1 transgene exhibit improved function during sepsis. J. Leukoc. Biol.; 2021; 110, pp. 711-722. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.4A0720-424R]
17. Que, T.; Zheng, H.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, X.; Qi, G.; La, Q.; Liang, T.; Li, Z.; Yi, G.; Zhang, S. et al. HMGA1 stimulates MYH9-dependent ubiquitination of GSK-3β via PI3K/Akt/c-Jun signaling to promote malignant progression and chemoresistance in gliomas. Cell Death Dis.; 2021; 12, 1147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04440-x]
18. Fedele, M.; Fusco, A. HMGA and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 2010; 1799, pp. 48-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.11.007]
19. Teng, K.; Wei, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Xiao, K.; Liu, J.; Dai, M.; Guan, X.; Yun, J. et al. KIFC1 is activated by TCF-4 and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis by regulating HMGA1 transcriptional activity. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.; 2019; 38, 329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1331-8]
20. Hou, P.; Meng, S.; Li, M.; Lin, T.; Chu, S.; Li, Z.; Zheng, J.; Gu, Y.; Bai, J. LINC00460/DHX9/IGF2BP2 complex promotes colorectal cancer proliferation and metastasis by mediating HMGA1 mRNA stability depending on m6A modification. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.; 2021; 40, 52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-01857-2]
21. Jin, G.H.; Shi, Y.; Tian, Y.; Cao, T.T.; Mao, Y.; Tang, T.Y. HMGA1 accelerates the malignant progression of gastric cancer through stimulating EMT. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.; 2020; 24, pp. 3642-3647. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202004_20826] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32329839]
22. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Dai, W.; Pei, M.; Hong, L.; Xiao, Y.; Hu, H. et al. HMGA1 promotes gastric cancer growth and metastasis by transactivating SUZ12 and CCDC43 expression. Aging; 2021; 13, pp. 16043-16061. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.203130] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34167089]
23. Yeung, K.T.; Yang, J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumor metastasis. Mol. Oncol.; 2017; 11, pp. 28-39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28085222]
24. Yang, J.; Antin, P.; Berx, G.; Blanpain, C.; Brabletz, T.; Bronner, M.; Campbell, K.; Cano, A.; Casanova, J.; Christofori, G. et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2020; 21, pp. 341-352. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9]
25. Yue, B.; Song, C.; Yang, L.; Cui, R.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, G. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer. Mol. Cancer; 2019; 18, 142. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1065-4]
26. Peng, Z.; Wang, C.-X.; Fang, E.-H.; Wang, G.-B.; Tong, Q. Role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer initiation and progression. World J. Gastroenterol.; 2014; 20, pp. 5403-5410. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5403]
27. Vasaikar, S.V.; Straub, P.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B. LinkedOmics: Analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2018; 46, pp. D956-D963. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1090]
28. Janiszewska, M.; Suvà, M.L.; Riggi, N.; Houtkooper, R.H.; Auwerx, J.; Clément-Schatlo, V.; Radovanovic, I.; Rheinbay, E.; Provero, P.; Stamenkovic, I. Imp2 controls oxidative phosphorylation and is crucial for preserving glioblastoma cancer stem cells. Genes Dev.; 2012; 26, pp. 1926-1944. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.188292.112]
29. Xu, X.; Yu, Y.; Zong, K.; Lv, P.; Gu, Y. Up-regulation of IGF2BP2 by multiple mechanisms in pancreatic cancer promotes cancer proliferation by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res.; 2019; 38, 497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1470-y]
30. Chaffer, C.L.; Weinberg, R.A. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science; 2011; 331, pp. 1559-1564. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1203543]
31. Nielsen, J.; Christiansen, J.; Lykke-Andersen, J.; Johnsen, A.H.; Wewer, U.M.; Nielsen, F.C. A family of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding proteins represses translation in late development. Mol. Cell. Biol.; 1999; 19, pp. 1262-1270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.2.1262] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9891060]
32. Schaeffer, V.; Hansen, K.M.; Morris, D.R.; LeBoeuf, R.C.; Abrass, C.K. RNA-binding protein IGF2BP2/IMP2 is required for laminin-β2 mRNA translation and is modulated by glucose concentration. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol.; 2012; 303, pp. F75-F82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00185.2012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22513850]
33. Dai, N.; Zhao, L.; Wrighting, D.; Krämer, D.; Majithia, A.; Wang, Y.; Cracan, V.; Borges-Rivera, D.; Mootha, V.K.; Nahrendorf, M. et al. IGF2BP2/IMP2-Deficient mice resist obesity through enhanced translation of Ucp1 mRNA and Other mRNAs encoding mitochondrial proteins. Cell Metab.; 2015; 21, pp. 609-621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.03.006]
34. Dai, N.; Ji, F.; Wright, J.; Minichiello, L.; Sadreyev, R.; Avruch, J. IGF2 mRNA binding protein-2 is a tumor promoter that drives cancer proliferation through its client mRNAs IGF2 and HMGA1. Elife; 2017; 6, e27155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27155] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753127]
35. Wang, Y.; Lu, J.-H.; Wu, Q.-N.; Jin, Y.; Wang, D.-S.; Chen, Y.-X.; Liu, J.; Luo, X.-J.; Meng, Q.; Pu, H.-Y. et al. LncRNA LINRIS stabilizes IGF2BP2 and promotes the aerobic glycolysis in colorectal cancer. Mol. Cancer; 2019; 18, 174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1105-0]
36. Zhang, Z.; Xing, Y.; Gao, W.; Yang, L.; Shi, J.; Song, W.; Li, T. N-methyladenosine (mA) reader IGF2BP2 promotes gastric cancer progression via targeting SIRT1. Bioengineered; 2022; 13, pp. 11541-11550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2068920]
37. Liu, D.; Xia, A.D.; Wu, L.-P.; Li, S.; Zhang, K.; Chen, D. IGF2BP2 promotes gastric cancer progression by regulating the IGF1R-RhoA-ROCK signaling pathway. Cell. Signal.; 2022; 94, 110313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110313]
38. Sleeman, J.P.; Thiery, J.P. SnapShot: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell; 2011; 145, 162.e161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.029]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Li, Junqing 2 ; Li, Dongwei 3 ; Jiang, Jianlong 2 ; Hao, Tengfei 2 ; Xia, Yujian 2 ; Lu, Xiaofang 4 ; Zhang, Changhua 2
; He, Yulong 2 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan 523000, China; Digestive Disease Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
2 Digestive Disease Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
3 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Dongguan Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan 523000, China
4 Department of Pathology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China