1. Introduction
Rhodobacter capsulatus is a metabolically versatile α-proteobacterium that produces a gene transfer agent (RcGTA), a virus-like element with the only known function of mediating horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Several species of bacteria from the order Rhodobacterales produce homologous GTAs, and genes encoding RcGTA-like GTAs are conserved in most genomes in the Rhodobacterales as well as many genomes of species in other alphaproteobacterial orders [1].
Gene transfer agents (GTAs) as a class carry out HGT using a mechanism resembling generalized transduction, in which random or quasi-random genomic DNA fragments are packaged into particles resembling small bacteriophages, which are released into the environment and introduce genes into other cells [1,2,3].
The genes encoding RcGTA and regulatory proteins are scattered over the R. capsulatus chromosome in 5 locations [4,5,6]. Production and release of RcGTA particles occurs in a small subset (<3%) of cells in a population [5,7], and the frequency is controlled by an extracellular repressor [8].
The interaction of RcGTA with recipient cells begins with binding to a polysaccharide capsule, followed by injection of DNA into the periplasm. DNA is translocated into the cytoplasm by homologues of competence (natural transformation) proteins, and incorporation of genes into the genome requires proteins involved in homologous recombination [9,10,11,12].
Subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics (concentrations that allow growth to occur at the same or similar rate of growth as in the absence of antibiotic) have been shown to have profound effects on bacterial transcription profiles [13]. The SOS response and HGT by transformation [14], conjugation [15], and phage-mediated transduction [16] may be stimulated by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Additionally, the spirochaete Brachyspira hyodysenteriae contains a GTA (not homologous to RcGTA) called VSH-1 that is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of the antibiotics carbadox and metronidazole [1,17]. Here, we report the effects of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on RcGTA-mediated genetic exchange.
We developed an assay to investigate the effect of substances on the frequency of gene transfer, and applied this assay to subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. The antibiotics we found to have the greatest effect on gene transfer are DNA gyrase inhibitors, the aminocoumarins novobiocin (Nb) and clorobiocin (Cb), and the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin (Cip). DNA gyrase is an essential bacterial enzyme that functions in altering DNA supercoiling stresses during DNA replication and transcription [18]. DNA gyrase inhibitors usually act via two mechanisms. Either the enzymatic activity of gyrase is inhibited or the covalent enzyme-DNA complex is stabilized. Aminocoumarins inhibit the ATPase activity of gyrase by acting on the B subunit (GyrB), whereas fluoroquinolones trap gyrase-cleaved DNA in a subunit A/DNA cleavage complex [19,20,21].
Because Nb, Cb, and Cip all caused an increase in RcGTA-mediated gene transfer, it appears that the effect is due to the overall inhibition of DNA gyrase activity, as opposed to the consequence of a particular mechanism. Interestingly, this increase in gene transfer was not due to increased production of RcGTA, but instead appeared to be due to the inhibition of DNA gyrase in recipient cells. We suggest that the frequency of allelic recombination is increased in recipient cells as a result of a change in DNA supercoiling that affects gene expression in R. capsulatus, resulting in changes in the amounts of proteins needed for import and integration of RcGTA-borne genes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
The E. coli strain DH5α was used for cloning, and the strains S17-1 and C600 (pDPT51) were used to conjugate plasmids into R. capsulatus. E. coli strains were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) medium [22] supplemented with antibiotics as needed at the following working concentrations (in µg/mL): ampicillin, 150; kanamycin, 50; spectinomycin, 100; gentamicin, 10.
The R. capsulatus strains used are described in Table 1. Strain ∆RC6 contains a 1.6-kb nptII segment of Tn5 (encoding kanamycin resistance) in place of photosynthesis genes (pufLMX) needed for phototrophic growth. Strain DW5 contains a 701 bp deletion of a third reaction center gene (puhA) also needed for phototrophic growth. R. capsulatus cultures were grown chemotrophically or phototrophically in RCV minimal medium [23] or YPS complex medium [24], supplemented with appropriate antibiotics at the following working concentrations (in µg/mL): kanamycin, 10; spectinomycin, 10; gentamicin, 5; rifampicin, 80.
Culture density was monitored by measuring optical density at 660 nm or by measuring light scattering with a Klett-Summerson photometer (red filter #66). An OD660 of 1.0 is approximately equal to 130 Klett units (KU), and 4.8 × 108 cfu/mL.
2.2. Recombinant DNA Techniques, Plasmids, and Primers
Standard methods of DNA isolation, analysis, modification and cloning were used [22].
2.3. Transduction Assay
Non-phototrophic strains DW5 and ∆RC6 were grown separately with aeration overnight in YPS medium, harvested by centrifugation, and suspended in 10 mL YPS at a concentration of 20 KU either alone as controls, or mixed in a 1:1 ratio. After incubation with aeration at 30 °C until the cultures had entered the stationary phase, equal numbers of cells (about 108 to 109 cells, based on turbidity) were plated onto YPS agar plates in 3 mL of molten (at ~47 °C YPS 0.4% agar, and recipients of wild type photosynthesis gene alleles selected by acquisition of phototrophic growth capability, using incubation in anaerobic jars with illumination for 2 to 3 days (see Figure S1).
2.4. RcGTA Bioassay
Bioassays were performed as described [30] with slight modifications. Donor and recipient cultures were grown aerobically at 30 °C in YPS medium until reaching the stationary phase. Filtered (0.2 µm pore diameter), cell-free supernatant (100 µL) from donor cultures was incubated for one h at 30 °C with 100 µL of recipient cells suspended in 500 µL G buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM NaCl, 500 mg/mL bovine serum albumin). The mixture was spread over YPS agar plates in 3 mL of molten YPS soft agar (0.4%, at ~47 °C) and incubated for four h at 30 °C to allow for expression of newly acquired genes. Gene transfer recipients were selected by acquisition of phototrophic growth capability or antibiotic resistance (see Figure S1).
2.5. SDS-PAGE and Western Blot
R. capsulatus cultures were grown for 24 h from a starting density of 20 KU and cellular and extracellular samples were separated by centrifugation. Cell-free culture supernatant was concentrated by lyophilization. Portions of cellular and extracellular samples from equivalent culture volumes at the same cell concentration, determined by culture absorbance at 660 nm, were boiled for 10 min in sample loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 1% β-mercaptoethanol), separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blotting was performed with a Mini Trans-Blot apparatus (BioRad) in Electroblot Buffer (27.5 mM Tris-Base, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol) at 100 V for 1.5 h. Blots were probed with a rabbit primary antibody raised against the R. capsulatus RcGTA capsid protein [31], followed by donkey anti-rabbit Ig secondary antibody linked to peroxidase (Amersham). Protein bands were detected using an electrochemiluminescence (ECL) kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Amersham), and exposure to X-ray film.
2.6. Disruption of RcGTA Gene g4
The spectinomycin resistance-encoding omega fragment (Ω) was excised from plasmid pHP45 [32] by SmaI digestion and inserted into the EcoRV site of the g4 (prohead protease) gene of cosmid p9H54 [33]. The resultant construct (p9H54Ω) was recombined in vivo with plasmid pDPT51 [34] in E. coli strain C600, and conjugated into the RcGTA overproducer strain Y262 to obtain RcGTA that was used to transduce the recipient strain, ΔRC6. Recipients with a disrupted g4 gene were selected for by spectinomycin resistance. The DW5 g4 disruption was created in a similar manner, except the g4 gene in p9H54 was disrupted with a KIXX cartridge [35], and the mutants were selected by acquisition of kanamycin resistance. Inability to produce RcGTA in both mutants was confirmed by lack of mature capsid protein in a Western blot.
2.7. Conjugation
Stationary phase E. coli donor cells were grown overnight in LB supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic, whereas stationary phase R. capsulatus recipient cells were grown overnight in RCV medium. Donor cells (200 µL) were harvested by centrifugation, washed and suspended in RCV medium, and then mixed with 500 µL of recipient culture. The mixture was spotted onto a 0.2 µm filter on an RCV agar plate and incubated at 30 °C overnight. The cells in this mixture were suspended and plated on RCV with selection for resistance to the appropriate antibiotic.
2.8. Construction of gyrB Overexpression Plasmid
The R. capsulatus SB1003 gyrB (rcc00004) coding region was amplified by PCR and ligated into the expression vector pRhokHi-6 [36] between the BamHI and NdeI restriction sites. This yielded plasmid pRhoKGyrB, in which the gyrB coding region is transcribed from the constitutive aphII promoter, and the mRNA translated using the ribosome-binding site provided by the plasmid, producing a C-terminally 6 His-tagged protein.
2.9. Statistical Analysis
Statistical significance was determined using the unpaired, two-tailed student’s t-test.
3. Results
3.1. Development of the Transduction Assay
This assay to examine the frequency of gene transfer between two strains is based on two non-phototrophic mutants: strain DW5 (containing a translationally in-frame deletion of the reaction center puhA gene) and ∆RC6 (containing a kanamycin-resistance cartridge in place of the reaction center pufLMX genes), which were cultivated together in mixed culture. Gene transfer could occur in either direction, and restoration of the ability to grow phototrophically was used as an indicator of gene transfer. After plating the mixture on an agar medium and selecting for phototrophic growth, the number of colonies yielded a quantitative measurement of the frequency of gene transfer events. Figure 1 shows an example of the appearance of plates in which there was a great difference between the treated and untreated cultures. In this assay, the effect of any substance on gene transfer can be determined by adding it to the mixture of cultures, incubating, and comparing the number of photosynthetic colonies obtained with that of a control with no substance added.
3.2. DNA Gyrase Inhibitors Increase the Frequency of RcGTA-Mediated Gene Transfer
Several types of antibiotic and other substances were screened and found to have little or no effect on gene transfer (Table S1). However, low concentrations of Cip (a DNA gyrase subunit A inhibitor) and inhibitors of gyrase subunit B (Nb and Cb) were found to cause relatively large increases in the frequency of gene transfer in the transduction assay (Figure 2). In subsequent work we focused on the effect of Nb, and the absence of R. capsulatus growth inhibition of 0.5 and 2.0 µg/mL concentrations is shown in Figure S2.
The direction of gene transfer was tested by patching colonies onto YPS agar plates containing rifampicin that were incubated with selection for phototrophic growth. Only DW5 contains the rifampicin resistance gene, and so only those colonies that were a result of DW5 receiving a photosynthesis gene from ∆RC6 would be able to grow phototrophically in the presence of rifampicin. It was unlikely that a rifampicin resistant colony could have arisen due to RcGTA-mediated transfer of both the required photosynthesis gene and the rifampicin resistance gene from DW5 to ∆RC6, because the probability of a double transfer event is extremely low. Although individual RcGTA gene transfers may occur independently with a frequency as high as 10−5, the frequency of two such events occurring simultaneously would be 10−10 [37]. All transductants examined (n = 90) were resistant to rifampicin, showing that transfer occurred from ∆RC6 to DW5. It appears that the packaging frequency of the smaller puhA wild type allele from a ∆RC6 donor was much greater than of the larger pufLMX wild type alleles from a DW5 donor, evidently due to the RcGTA head maximal capacity for linear DNA of ~4.5 kb in length [38]. The length of chromosomal DNA deleted from the puhA gene in strain DW5 is about 710 bp [28], whereas the length of the pufLMX deletion in ∆RC6 is about 4.5 kb [27].
The transduction assay was also performed using the strain ΔLHII (which contains a spectinomycin resistance cartridge inserted into the non-essential puc (LHII) operon as well as the rifampicin resistance gene from the SB1003 parent strain) instead of DW5, and recombinants were selected by the presence of both kanamycin resistance (from ΔRC6) and rifampicin resistance (from ΔLHII) in chemotrophic growth, instead of phototrophic growth (Figure S3). The direction of transfer was determined by testing the doubly resistant transductants for spectinomycin resistance, because only with transfer of kanamycin resistance from ΔRC6 to ΔLHII would a cell be resistant to all three antibiotics. It was found that transfer between these two strains occurred in both directions, although mostly from ΔLHII to ΔRC6 (4 of 52 transductants tested were resistant to all three antibiotics). Evidently the frequency of transfer of rifampicin resistance (a point mutation) was greater than the transfer frequency of the ~1.2 kb-long kanamycin resistance cartridge (see Discussion section).
The possibility that an RcGTA-independent gene transfer mechanism was operating was evaluated by disruption of the RcGTA gene g4 (rcc01686) encoding a protease needed for capsid maturation [33]. Disruption of this gene in both strains DW5_Δg4 and ΔRC6_Δg4 used in a transduction assay resulted in the absence of recombinants. Therefore, this assay is not only sensitive, but also specific for RcGTA-mediated gene transduction.
The effects of Nb on production and release of RcGTA were investigated further using a bioassay, in which RcGTA produced during the co-culture of DW5 and ∆RC6 in the presence or absence of Nb was separated from cells, and used to transfer phototrophic growth capability to strain DW5. Despite an increase in gene transfer in the presence of Nb in the transduction assay, no increase in the number of phototrophic colonies when RcGTA was obtained from cultures grown in the presence of Nb, compared to cultures grown in the absence of antibiotic (Figure 3A). This indicates that there was no difference in the amount of RcGTA present in cell-free supernatants of cultures grown in the presence or absence of Nb.
When cultures were analyzed by Western blot, Nb did not reproducibly affect the levels of RcGTA (Figure 3B and Figure S4), consistent with the frequencies of gene transfer in the bioassays. Therefore, we hypothesized that Nb had little effect on the production of RcGTA, but instead greatly increased the capability of cells to obtain new alleles from RcGTA particles.
3.3. Kinetics of the Novobiocin Effect in the Transduction Assay
Because of the variability of the fold-increase in gene transfer due to Nb in the transduction assay (compare 2 µg/mL fold-increases in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3), we hypothesized that the frequency of transduction in the Nb-treated and/or untreated cultures varies significantly depending on exactly how long the cultures were grown into the stationary phase. As shown in Figure 4, there are indeed substantial changes in the transduction frequency in both the Nb-treated and untreated cultures over the 72 h time period of these experiments. As a result, the increase in transduction due to Nb varied from 5.1 to 27.3-fold. Nevertheless, these experiments confirm that the Nb effect is consistently substantial over a wide range of time scales, and we suggest that variations in the exact degree of increase in transduction frequency do not affect our general conclusion that subinhibitory concentrations of Nb stimulate RcGTA-mediated gene transfer.
3.4. Overexpression of gyrB Increases Resistance to Novobiocin and Inhibits the Novobiocin-Dependent Increase in Gene Transfer
Because Nb has been shown to bind to the GyrB protein in other species [19], and R. capsulatus contains homologues of gyrA and gyrB genes, we hypothesized that the R. capsulatus GyrB protein is the target of Nb-stimulation of RcGTA-mediated gene transfer.
To address whether Nb-binding to GyrB stimulates gene transfer, we over-expressed the R. capsulatus gyrB homologue (rcc00004) in strains DW5 and ∆RC6, using the plasmid pRhoKGyrB (which constitutively expresses the gyrB gene from the neo promoter). The presence of plasmid pRhoKGyrB enabled the strains DW5 and ∆RC6 to grow in the presence of Nb at 40 µg/mL, which completely inhibited the growth of these strains lacking the plasmid (Figure S5). Therefore, an increase in gyrB expression results in an increase in resistance to Nb, consistent with GyrB being the target of Nb.
When strain ∆RC6 containing plasmid pRhoKGyrB (designated as strain ∆RC6 KG in Figure 5) was grown in co-culture with strain DW5, the presence of Nb stimulated gene transduction, as it did in co-cultures of strains DW5 and ∆RC6. However, when strain DW5 contained plasmid pRhoKGyrB (designated as strain DW5 KG in Figure 5), there was a great decrease in the number of colonies obtained in the presence of Nb, compared to cultures in which neither strain or only ∆RC6 contained the plasmid. As in earlier experiments, all transductants examined (35 for each condition) resulted from gene transfer from ∆RC6 to DW5. Therefore, the increase in gyrB expression negated the stimulatory effect of Nb on gene transfer, but only when gyrB was overexpressed in the recipient strain. We interpret these data to mean that binding of Nb to GyrB stimulates gene transfer, and does so by increasing the frequency of allele replacement in the recipient cell.
4. Discussion
In this research, we demonstrated that subinhibitory levels of DNA gyrase inhibitors cause an increase in RcGTA-dependent gene transfer frequency in R. capsulatus. The gyrase inhibitors that showed this effect were Nb and Cb, both aminocoumarins that affect the B subunit of gyrase, and Cip, a fluoroquinolone that targets the A subunit of gyrase [20,21]. The effect of Nb on gene transfer was shown not to be due to an increase in production of RcGTA, on the basis of bioassays and Western blots probed with capsid antiserum (Figure 3 and Figure S3). This was unexpected, as antibiotic-induced transduction by prophages is typically due to increased phage induction [16,39,40]. Additionally, the non-homologous GTA found in B. hyodysenteriae, VSH-1, mediates increased gene transfer in the presence of subinhibitory levels of carbadox and metronidazole through increased transcription of VSH-1 genes [17]. Both carbadox and metronidazole are metabolized to products that interact with bacterial DNA and cause mutations and DNA strand breaks. The gyrase inhibitors studied here (Nb, Cb and Cip) also cause DNA damage, although they do this through stoppage of the DNA replication fork and deregulation of DNA supercoiling [41]. Therefore, although a spirochaete and an alphaproteobacterium both show an increase in gene transfer by non-homologous GTAs in response to DNA damaging agents, the mechanism by which the increase in gene transfer occurs is different.
To confirm that the effect of Nb on RcGTA-mediated gene transfer was manifested through DNA gyrase, Nb resistance (NbR) was conferred on strains DW5 and ∆RC6 by constitutive expression of gyrB from the plasmid pRhoKGyrB (Figure 5 and Figure S4). When ∆RC6 (the RcGTA producer in this assay) overexpressed gyrB, there was little change in gene transfer frequency compared to the control cultures in which neither strain contained the plasmid. This result is consistent with the idea that Nb increases gene transfer frequency by an effect on the recipient cell, but not on the production of RcGTA. When DW5 (the recipient of RcGTA-borne genes in this assay) overexpressed gyrB in the presence of Nb, there was a much lower frequency of gene transfer, compared to the cultures in which neither strain or only ∆RC6 contained the plasmid. Because DNA gyrase is a heterotetramer of 2GyrA + 2GyrB and gyrA was not overexpressed it is likely that the excess in GyrB resulted in a mixture of heterotetramers in which one, both, or neither GyrB bound Nb, resulting in a mixed population of holoenzyme activities. Regardless, it appears that an excess of GyrB suppressed gene transfer resulting from a subinhibitory concentration of Nb, consistent with the idea that the Nb mode of action on transduction frequency is to increase recipient capability by inhibition of DNA gyrase activity. We consider in the following paragraphs two general ways in which inhibition of DNA gyrase activity could increase recipient capability.
It has been shown in a variety of in vivo and in vitro assays that DNA gyrase-dependent negative supercoiling is essential for homologous recombination [42]. This is true for recombination between covalently closed double-stranded DNA molecules as well as between a supercoiled molecule and linear DNA, which is the case for recombination between the linear RcGTA-borne DNA and the genome of the recipient cell. Therefore, because Nb inhibits DNA gyrase and DNA gyrase is needed for homologous recombination, whereas we found that Nb stimulated recipient capability that requires homologous recombination, the effect described here appears to arise from another process.
DNA gyrase-dependent DNA supercoiling density also affects gene transcription [43]. In one early study it was found that the expression of 7% of E. coli genes was affected by changes in the level of supercoiling, either by conditional mutation of the DNA gyrase gene gyrB or by the addition of a gyrase inhibitor such as Nb [44]. Therefore, Nb could in principle affect gene expression in R. capsulatus too, resulting in changes in the amounts of Com, DprA or RecA proteins needed for import and integration of RcGTA-borne genes [9,11,12]. On balance, we favor this possible mechanism to explain the stimulation of recipient capability by Nb, although we cannot specify whether transcription of any of the genes known to be required for recipient capability, or possibly a new gene that has not yet been identified, is affected by Nb.
Genome-wide expression studies would be useful in determining exactly how Nb influences the frequency of gene transfer. Additionally, elucidation of the exact mechanism of action of subinhibitory levels of Nb in R. capsulatus may benefit from NbR mutants that are resistant by a mechanism different from that of overexpression of GyrB. Understanding how gene transfer is affected in such mutants could clarify the role of DNA gyrase in RcGTA-mediated gene transfer.
The clinical and agricultural use of antibiotics has led to their widespread presence in natural environments at subinhibitory levels, as well as selection for resistance when levels are high [45]. Here, we show that transduction by RcGTA is influenced by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics that inhibit DNA gyrase. Given the prevalence of members of the Rhodobacterales and other alphaproteobacteria that contain RcGTA-like gene clusters in many ecosystems [46,47,48,49,50], gene transfer by RcGTA-like particles may be a significant player in alphaproteobacterial evolution. The presence of low levels of such antibiotics in the environment may change the rate of adaptation and evolution of these bacteria, because HGT provides a feedstock in addition to mutation upon which natural selection acts [51,52].
Conceptualization, J.T.B.; methodology, R.B.-M. and J.T.B.; formal analysis, R.B.-M. and J.T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.T.B.; project administration, J.T.B.; funding acquisition, J.T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We thank Julian E. Davies for suggesting that we investigate the possible effects of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on RcGTA-mediated horizontal gene transfer.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 1. Representative plates from a transduction assay. (Left) mixed culture of strains DW5 and ∆RC6 grown in the absence of antibiotic. (Right) mixed culture of strains DW5 and ∆RC6 grown in the presence of Nb at 2 µg/mL, showing an estimated 30-fold increase in the number of colonies, and therefore gene transfer. Selection was for phototrophic growth, and each strain grown and plated alone yielded no colonies whatsoever.
Figure 2. Results of transduction assays evaluating the effects of DNA gyrase inhibitors. Cultures (mixtures of equal numbers of strains DW5 and ∆RC6) were grown in triplicate with or without antibiotics. On the horizontal axis: Nb, novobiocin; Cb, clorobiocin; Cip, ciprofloxacin; numbers indicate the concentrations in µg/mL. The vertical axis gives the frequency of gene transfer relative to the average of cultures grown in the absence of an antibiotic (alone). The asterisk * indicates p < 0.01 in pairwise comparisons of cultures grown in the presence and absence of an antibiotic. Error bars show the standard deviation, n = 3.
Figure 3. Comparison of gene transfer in a transduction assay and bioassay, and RcGTA levels, in response to the presence of Nb. (A) Transduction assay cultures (mixture of strains DW5 and ∆RC6) were grown in duplicate and used for transduction assays as well as for supernatant donors in bioassays. The numbers below the graph give the concentration of Nb in ug/mL in the cultures. * p < 0.05 compared to cultures grown without antibiotic. Error bars show the range. (B) Cells (intracellular) and cell-free supernatants (extracellular) from transduction assay cultures were examined by Western blot, probed with RcGTA capsid antiserum. The numbers above each lane give the concentration of Nb in ug/mL in the cultures.
Figure 4. Time course of transduction assays in the presence or absence of 2 µg/mL novobiocin (Nb). Transduction assay of strains ∆RC6 and ∆LHII with time points at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h, yielding 5.1-, 7.3-, 27.3-, and 11.5-fold average increases in gene transfer, respectively, compared to cultures grown without Nb at the same time point. Error bars give standard deviations (n = 3), and * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.1 relative to the control cultures grown without Nb at each time point.
Figure 5. Transduction assays with NbR strains. Strains DW5, ∆RC6, DW5 containing plasmid pRhoKGyrB (DW5 KG), and ∆RC6 containing pRhoKGyrB (∆RC6 KG) were used. All combinations were grown with or without Nb at 2 µg/mL. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 3), and * indicates p < 0.01 compared to the same mixture of strains grown without Nb.
List of R. capsulatus strains.
Strain | Source | Description |
---|---|---|
B10 | [ |
wild type |
SB1003 | [ |
RifR B10 derivative |
ΔRC6 | [ |
B10 background, puf operon knockout, KanR |
DW5 | [ |
SB1003 background, translationally in-frame puhA deletion |
SBΔRC6 | this study | transduction of ΔRC6 puf operon knockout into SB1003, KanR |
ΔRC6_Δg4 | this study | ΔRC6 with g4 (GTA protease gene) disruption, KanR/SpcR |
DW5_Δg4 | this study | DW5 with g4 (GTA protease gene) disruption, KanR |
ΔLHII | [ |
SBI003 background, puc operon knockout, SpcR |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Kogay, R.; Koppenhöfer, S.; Beatty, J.T.; Kuhn, J.H.; Lang, A.S.; Zhaxybayeva, O. Formal recognition and classification of gene transfer agents as viriforms. Virus Evol.; in press [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ve/veac100]
2. Lang, A.S.; Zhaxybayeva, O.; Beatty, J.T. Gene transfer agents: Phage-like elements of genetic exchange. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2012; 10, pp. 472-482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2802] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22683880]
3. Bardy, P.; Fuzik, T.; Hrebik, D.; Pantucek, R.; Thomas Beatty, J.; Plevka, P. Structure and mechanism of DNA delivery of a gene transfer agent. Nat. Commun.; 2020; 11, 3034. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16669-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541663]
4. Westbye, A.B.; Leung, M.M.; Florizone, S.; Taylor, T.A.; Johnson, J.A.; Fogg, P.C.; Beatty, J.T. Phosphate concentration and the putative sensor-kinase protein CckA modulate cell lysis and release of the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent (RcGTA). J. Bacteriol.; 2013; 195, pp. 5025-5040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00669-13]
5. Hynes, A.P.; Mercer, R.G.; Watton, D.E.; Buckley, C.B.; Lang, A.S. DNA packaging bias and differential expression of gene transfer agent genes within a population during production and release of the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent, RcGTA. Mol. Microbiol.; 2012; 85, pp. 314-325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08113.x]
6. Westbye, A.B.; Kuchinski, K.; Yip, C.K.; Beatty, J.T. The gene transfer agent RcGTA contains head spikes needed for binding to the Rhodobacter capsulatus polysaccharide cell capsule. J. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 428, pp. 477-491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.12.010]
7. Fogg, P.C.; Westbye, A.B.; Beatty, J.T. One for all or all for one: Heterogeneous expression and host cell lysis are key to gene transfer agent activity in Rhodobacter capsulatus. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e43772. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043772]
8. Ding, H.; Grull, M.P.; Mulligan, M.E.; Lang, A.S.; Beatty, J.T. Induction of Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent gene expression is a bistable stochastic process repressed by an extracellular calcium-binding RTX protein homologue. J. Bacteriol.; 2019; 201, e00430-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00430-19]
9. Brimacombe, C.A.; Ding, H.; Johnson, J.A.; Beatty, J.T. Homologues of genetic transformation DNA import genes are required for Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent recipient capability regulated by the response regulator CtrA. J. Bacteriol.; 2015; 197, pp. 2653-2663. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00332-15]
10. Brimacombe, C.A.; Stevens, A.; Jun, D.; Mercer, R.; Lang, A.S.; Beatty, J.T. Quorum-sensing regulation of a capsular polysaccharide receptor for the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent (RcGTA). Mol. Microbiol.; 2013; 87, pp. 802-817. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12132]
11. Brimacombe, C.A.; Ding, H.; Beatty, J.T. Rhodobacter capsulatus DprA is essential for RecA-mediated gene transfer agent (RcGTA) recipient capability regulated by quorum-sensing and the CtrA response regulator. Mol. Microbiol.; 2014; 92, pp. 1260-1278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12628]
12. Westbye, A.B.; Beatty, J.T.; Lang, A.S. Guaranteeing a captive audience: Coordinated regulation of gene transfer agent (GTA) production and recipient capability by cellular regulators. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.; 2017; 38, pp. 122-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.003]
13. Goh, E.B.; Yim, G.; Tsui, W.; McClure, J.; Surette, M.G.; Davies, J. Transcriptional modulation of bacterial gene expression by subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2002; 99, pp. 17025-17030. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252607699] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12482953]
14. Charpentier, X.; Kay, E.; Schneider, D.; Shuman, H.A. Antibiotics and UV radiation induce competence for natural transformation in Legionella pneumophila. J. Bacteriol.; 2011; 193, pp. 1114-1121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.01146-10] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21169481]
15. Beaber, J.W.; Hochhut, B.; Waldor, M.K. SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Nature; 2004; 427, pp. 72-74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02241] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14688795]
16. Zhang, X.; McDaniel, A.D.; Wolf, L.E.; Keusch, G.T.; Waldor, M.K.; Acheson, D.W. Quinolone antibiotics induce Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages, toxin production, and death in mice. J. Infect. Dis.; 2000; 181, pp. 664-670. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/315239]
17. Stanton, T.B.; Humphrey, S.B.; Sharma, V.K.; Zuerner, R.L. Collateral effects of antibiotics: Carbadox and metronidazole induce VSH-1 and facilitate gene transfer among Brachyspira hyodysenteriae strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2008; 74, pp. 2950-2956. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00189-08]
18. Bush, N.G.; Evans-Roberts, K.; Maxwell, A. DNA Topoisomerases. EcoSal Plus; 2015; 6, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0010-2014]
19. Heide, L. New aminocoumarin antibiotics as gyrase inhibitors. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.; 2014; 304, pp. 31-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.08.013]
20. Mustaev, A.; Malik, M.; Zhao, X.; Kurepina, N.; Luan, G.; Oppegard, L.M.; Hiasa, H.; Marks, K.R.; Kerns, R.J.; Berger, J.M. et al. Fluoroquinolone-gyrase-DNA complexes: Two modes of drug binding. J. Biol. Chem.; 2014; 289, pp. 12300-12312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.529164]
21. Blower, T.R.; Williamson, B.H.; Kerns, R.J.; Berger, J.M. Crystal structure and stability of gyrase-fluoroquinolone cleaved complexes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 1706-1713. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525047113]
22. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989.
23. Beatty, J.T.; Gest, H. Biosynthetic and bioenergetic functions of citric acid cycle reactions in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. J. Bacteriol.; 1981; 148, pp. 584-593. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.148.2.584-593.1981] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7298578]
24. Wall, J.D.; Weaver, P.F.; Gest, H. Gene transfer agents, bacteriophages, and bacteriocins of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Arch. Microbiol.; 1975; 105, pp. 217-224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00447140] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1190956]
25. Marrs, B. Genetic recombination in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1974; 71, pp. 971-973. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.3.971]
26. Yen, H.C.; Marrs, B. Map of genes for carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. J. Bacteriol.; 1976; 126, pp. 619-629. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.126.2.619-629.1976] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1262313]
27. Chen, C.Y.; Beatty, J.T.; Cohen, S.N.; Belasco, J.G. An intercistronic stem-loop structure functions as an mRNA decay terminator necessary but insufficient for puf mRNA stability. Cell; 1988; 52, pp. 609-619. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90473-4]
28. Wong, D.K.; Collins, W.J.; Harmer, A.; Lilburn, T.G.; Beatty, J.T. Directed mutagenesis of the Rhodobacter capsulatus puhA gene and orf 214: Pleiotropic effects on photosynthetic reaction center and light-harvesting 1 complexes. J. Bacteriol.; 1996; 178, pp. 2334-2342. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.8.2334-2342.1996]
29. LeBlanc, H.N.; Beatty, J.T. Rhodobacter capsulatus puc operon: Promoter location, transcript sizes and effects of deletions on photosynthetic growth. J. Gen. Microbiol.; 1993; 139, pp. 101-109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-139-1-101]
30. Leung, M.M.; Brimacombe, C.A.; Spiegelman, G.B.; Beatty, J.T. The GtaR protein negatively regulates transcription of the gtaRI operon and modulates gene transfer agent (RcGTA) expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Mol. Microbiol.; 2012; 83, pp. 759-774. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07963.x]
31. Taylor, T.A. Evolution and Regulation of the Gene Transfer Agent (GTA) of Rhodobacter capsulatus; University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
32. Fellay, R.; Frey, J.; Krisch, H. Interposon mutagenesis of soil and water bacteria: A family of DNA fragments designed for in vitro insertional mutagenesis of gram-negative bacteria. Gene; 1987; 52, pp. 147-154. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(87)90041-2]
33. Lang, A.S.; Beatty, J.T. Genetic analysis of a bacterial genetic exchange element: The gene transfer agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2000; 97, pp. 859-864. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2.859] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10639170]
34. Taylor, D.P.; Cohen, S.N.; Clark, W.G.; Marrs, B.L. Alignment of genetic and restriction maps of the photosynthesis region of the Rhodopseudomonas capsulata chromosome by a conjugation-mediated marker rescue technique. J. Bacteriol.; 1983; 154, pp. 580-590. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.154.2.580-590.1983] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6302077]
35. Barany, F. Single-stranded hexameric linkers: A system for in-phase insertion mutagenesis and protein engineering. Gene; 1985; 37, pp. 111-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(85)90263-X]
36. Katzke, N.; Arvani, S.; Bergmann, R.; Circolone, F.; Markert, A.; Svensson, V.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Heck, A.; Drepper, T. A novel T7 RNA polymerase dependent expression system for high-level protein production in the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. Protein Expr. Purif.; 2010; 69, pp. 137-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2009.08.008]
37. Solioz, M.; Yen, H.C.; Marris, B. Release and uptake of gene transfer agent by Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. J. Bacteriol.; 1975; 123, pp. 651-657. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.123.2.651-657.1975]
38. Yen, H.C.; Hu, N.T.; Marrs, B.L. Characterization of the gene transfer agent made by an overproducer mutant of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. J. Mol. Biol.; 1979; 131, pp. 157-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(79)90071-8]
39. Bearson, B.L.; Brunelle, B.W. Fluoroquinolone induction of phage-mediated gene transfer in multidrug-resistant Salmonella. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents; 2015; 46, pp. 201-204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.04.008]
40. Bearson, B.L.; Allen, H.K.; Brunelle, B.W.; Lee, I.S.; Casjens, S.R.; Stanton, T.B. The agricultural antibiotic carbadox induces phage-mediated gene transfer in Salmonella. Front. Microbiol.; 2014; 5, 52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00052]
41. Collin, F.; Karkare, S.; Maxwell, A. Exploiting bacterial DNA gyrase as a drug target: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2011; 92, pp. 479-497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3557-z]
42. Kowalczykowski, S.C.; Dixon, D.A.; Eggleston, A.K.; Lauder, S.D.; Rehrauer, W.M. Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev.; 1994; 58, pp. 401-465. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mr.58.3.401-465.1994]
43. Dorman, C.J.; Dorman, M.J. DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression. Biophys. Rev.; 2016; 8, pp. 209-220. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12551-016-0205-y]
44. Peter, B.J.; Arsuaga, J.; Breier, A.M.; Khodursky, A.B.; Brown, P.O.; Cozzarelli, N.R. Genomic transcriptional response to loss of chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli. Genome Biol.; 2004; 5, R87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-11-r87] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15535863]
45. Kummerer, K. Resistance in the environment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.; 2004; 54, pp. 311-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh325] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15215223]
46. Tomasch, J.; Wang, H.; Hall, A.T.K.; Patzelt, D.; Preusse, M.; Petersen, J.; Brinkmann, H.; Bunk, B.; Bhuju, S.; Jarek, M. et al. Packaging of Dinoroseobacter shibae DNA into gene transfer agent particles is not random. Genome Biol. Evol.; 2018; 10, pp. 359-369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29325123]
47. Nagao, N.; Yamamoto, J.; Komatsu, H.; Suzuki, H.; Hirose, Y.; Umekage, S.; Ohyama, T.; Kikuchi, Y. The gene transfer agent-like particle of the marine phototrophic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. Biochem. Biophys. Rep.; 2015; 4, pp. 369-374. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.11.002]
48. Biers, E.J.; Wang, K.; Pennington, C.; Belas, R.; Chen, F.; Moran, M.A. Occurrence and expression of gene transfer agent genes in marine bacterioplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2008; 74, pp. 2933-2939. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02129-07] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18359833]
49. Kogay, R.; Neely, T.B.; Birnbaum, D.P.; Hankel, C.R.; Shakya, M.; Zhaxybayeva, O. Machine-learning classification suggests that many alphaproteobacterial prophages may instead be gene transfer agents. Genome Biol. Evol.; 2019; 11, pp. 2941-2953. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz206] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31560374]
50. Lang, A.S.; Beatty, J.T. Importance of widespread gene transfer agent genes in α-proteobacteria. Trends Microbiol.; 2007; 15, pp. 54-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.12.001]
51. Power, J.J.; Pinheiro, F.; Pompei, S.; Kovacova, V.; Yuksel, M.; Rathmann, I.; Forster, M.; Lassig, M.; Maier, B. Adaptive evolution of hybrid bacteria by horizontal gene transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2021; 118, e2007873118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007873118]
52. Arnold, B.J.; Huang, I.T.; Hanage, W.P. Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2022; 20, pp. 206-218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00650-4]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Rhodobacter capsulatus produces a bacteriophage-like particle called the gene transfer agent (RcGTA) that mediates horizontal gene transfer. RcGTA particles transfer random ~4.5-kb fragments of genomic DNA that integrate into recipient genomes by allelic replacement. This work addresses the effect of sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on gene transfer by RcGTA. A transduction assay was developed to test the effects of various substances on gene transfer. Using this assay, low concentrations of DNA gyrase inhibitors were found to increase the frequency of gene transfer. Novobiocin was studied in more detail, and it was found that this antibiotic did not influence the production or release of RcGTA but instead appeared to act on the recipient cells. The target of novobiocin in other species has been shown to be the GyrB subunit of DNA gyrase (a heterotetramer of 2GyrA and 2GyrB). R. capsulatus encodes GyrA and GyrB homologues, and a GyrB overexpression plasmid was created and found to confer resistance to novobiocin. The presence of the overexpression plasmid in recipient cells greatly diminished the novobiocin-mediated increase in gene transfer, confirming that this effect is due to the binding of novobiocin by GyrB. The results of this work show that antibiotics affect gene transfer in R. capsulatus and may be relevant to microbial genetic exchange in natural ecosystems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer