It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
MEK inhibitors (MEKi) have limited efficacy in KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, and this is attributed to both intrinsic and adaptive mechanisms of drug resistance. While many studies have focused on the former, there remains a dearth of data regarding acquired resistance to MEKi in LUAD. We established trametinib-resistant KRAS mutant LUAD cells through dose escalation and performed targeted MSK-IMPACT sequencing to identify drivers of MEKi resistance. Comparing resistant cells to their sensitive counterparts revealed alteration of genes associated with trametinib response. We describe a state of “drug addiction” in resistant cases where cells are dependent on continuous culture in trametinib for survival. We show that dependence on ERK2 suppression underlies this phenomenon and that trametinib removal hyperactivates ERK, resulting in ER stress and apoptosis. Amplification of KRASG12C occurs in drug-addicted cells and blocking mutant-specific activity with AMG 510 rescues the lethality associated with trametinib withdrawal. Furthermore, we show that increased KRASG12C expression is lethal to other KRAS mutant LUAD cells, consequential to ERK hyperactivation. Our study determines the drug-addicted phenotype in lung cancer is associated with KRAS amplification and demonstrates that toxic acquired genetic changes can develop de novo in the background of MAPK suppression with MEK inhibitors. We suggest that the presence of mutant KRAS amplification in patients may identify those that may benefit from a “drug holiday” to circumvent drug resistance. These findings demonstrate the toxic potential of hyperactive ERK signaling and highlight potential therapeutic opportunities in patients bearing KRAS mutations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 BC Cancer Research Institute, Department of Integrative Oncology, Vancouver, Canada
2 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.51462.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9952)
3 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.51462.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9952); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, New York, USA (GRID:grid.51462.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9952)
4 Weill Cornell Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
5 BC Cancer Research Institute, Department of Integrative Oncology, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.5386.8); University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830)