CRISPR/Cas9 for Insect Pests Management: A Comprehensive Review of Advances and Applications

Abstract

Insect pests impose a serious threat to agricultural productivity. Initially, for pest management, several breeding approaches were applied which have now been gradually replaced by genome editing (GE) strategies as they are more efficient and less laborious. CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat/CRISPR-associated system) was discovered as an adaptive immune system of bacteria and with the scientific advancements, it has been improvised into a revolutionary genome editing technique. Due to its specificity and easy handling, CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing has been applied to a wide range of organisms for various research purposes. For pest control, diverse approaches have been applied utilizing CRISPR/Cas9-like systems, thereby making the pests susceptible to various insecticides, compromising the reproductive fitness of the pest, hindering the metamorphosis of the pest, and there have been many other benefits. This article reviews the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 and proposes potential research ideas for CRISPR/Cas9-based integrated pest management. CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been successfully applied to several insect pest species. However, there is no review available which thoroughly summarizes the application of the technique in insect genome editing for pest control. Further, authors have highlighted the advancements in CRISPR/Cas9 research and have discussed its future possibilities in pest management.

1. Introduction

Annually, phytophagous insects damage one fifth of the world’s total crop yield. Biotic stress affects the food security of any country by compromising the quality and quantity of the crop productivity. The yield loss due to insect infestation has devastating impacts on the society such as, hunger and poverty. The combined impact of the emergence and/or re-emergence of insect pests and rapidly growing human population calls for immediate inventions and the use of rigorous and integrated agricultural practices. The FAO estimated that plant diseases and pests are responsible for a 20–40% reduction in the global crop yields per year [1]. Researchers predicted a strong decline in the crop yield in response to climate change and weather pattern variations. Climatic changes might increase the risk that is caused by phytophagous pests, thereby turning them into a more harmful threat to the crops [2]. Over the past thousands of years, plant breeding has been exploited for constructing insect resistant crop varieties, however, it is laborious, time-consuming, has a stochastic nature, and the screening process is a very challenging practice [3]. Further, the unavailability of a resistance source in the gene pool has restricted the scope of breeding a resistant cultivar [4,5]. Under such a scenario, the use of toxic and cost-intensive agrochemicals appeared to be the only convenient solution for crop protection. Considering the toll these chemicals take on the ecosystem, there was an urge to develop genetically stable and fixed plant types [6].

Genome editing (GE) can play a pivotal role as it is a more promising and an environmentally friendly answer that can be used to deal with the situation. It all began with the gene-targeting experiments on the protoplast of Nicotiana tabacum which were performed in 1988 [7] and the findings in 1993 which supported that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) improved the gene-targeting efficacy [8]. Since then, the scientific orientation shifted towards the development of targeted genome editing techniques. The adoption of GE systems provided remarkable results in the field of the genetic improvement of crops. Genetic engineering rationalized the biological research world with the introduction of methods involving in vivo genome editing. The GE technique results in base substitutions and/or insertions/deletions (indels) in the target DNA. It includes several techniques, for instance, the use of zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the recently established clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9) system. In contrast to TALENs and ZFNs, the CRISPR/Cas system is more direct and easier to handle as it requires a single guide RNA (gRNA) for target determination with the Cas9 nuclease [8,9]. In the recent past, the preference has shifted from breeding insect-resistant cultivars to making CRISPR/Cas9-mediated modifications in the agronomic traits or targeted mutagenesis in the insect genome. The constant modifications to gene knockout strategies, transgene integration, nucleotide substitution, transcription regulation, etc., have made the CRISPR/Cas system an easy-to-apply, cost-effective, and a widely used technique for manipulations at the genetic levels [10,11,12]. Biotic stress resistance is one of the traits that is improved by GE, which makes CRISPR/Cas system highly efficient in enhancing global food security, crop protection, and sustainable agriculture (Figure 1). On the subject of insects, many research groups have reviewed the application of various GE techniques, with special attention being paid to the CRISPR/Cas9 system in arthropods; in spite of this, no inclusive report is available which covers all of the insect pests. The recent developments in the field of molecular biology and omics approaches presented that there has been a peak in the usage of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for insect pest management, and the data from these reports are not summarized in any previously published reviews. In this study, the authors emphasize and explain the prospects and applications of CRISPR/Cas technology in different insect groups for pest management. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has the potential of providing promising approaches for the control of insect pests. Therefore, summing up the CRISPR/Cas9-based control strategies against insect pests is significant in achieving global goals such as sustainable development.

1.1. CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Editing in Insects

Biotechnology and molecular biology have experienced a great transformation and advancement since the development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system in the mammalian cells in the year 2012 [13]. With the discovery of the homology-dependent cleavage recombination mechanism, the utility of CRISPR/Cas9 was explored in genome editing, and it emerged as an assuring genome editing tool. The growing utility of gene-editing tools as a site-specific genome-editing approach offers infinite opportunities which may have an impact on important agronomic traits such as resistance to biotic stresses [14,15,16,17]. The present study reviews the novel opportunities that CRISPR/Cas9 system offers and how it has attracted all of the attention by offering distinct advantages in the area of insect pest control thus ensuring a good crop yield and food security. A combination of gene editing tools and insect manipulation methods have been already used in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, several tephritids, and mosquitoes which have answered some basic questions about insect biology. Recently, the technology has been utilized for the development of novel pest control strategies [18,19,20,21], and it has been proven to be an efficient approach for pest management [22,23,24]. The advancements in genome editing methods paved the way for inventive pest control methods by the development of genetically modified insects. The CRISPR/Cas technology is evolving as it is very beneficial for efficient tailoring and gene manipulation. The components of the CRISPR/Cas tool (sgRNA and the Cas9 protein) can be delivered in the target organism in form of plasmid DNA, RNA or a ribonucleo-protein (RNP) complex [25]. Some of the phytophagous insect orders that have been explored for pest management using genome editing by the CRISPR/Cas system are reviewed in this article (Table 1).

1.2. Diptera

Diptera is one of the largest insect orders. The insects of this order are two-winged and are called true flies. Dipterans are abundantly present all around the world, thus, the order is diversified. Their larvae are serious agricultural pests on solanceae, cucurbitaceae and other crop plant families.

1.2.1. Drosophila 

As it is the model organism, D. melanogaster encouraged and improved the genome editing technology in insects through use of CRISPR/Cas9 [25]. Gratz et al. 2013 were the first to report the CRISPR/Cas9 technology-based deletion of 4.6 kb of chromosomal DNA Drosophila genome. The deletion was performed in yellow locus by using two target sgRNAs and an ssODN (single-stranded oligonucleotide donor) template [26]. Further, the possible applications and benefits of CRISPR/Cas9 in the designer flies generation were discussed [27]. In 2013, scientists developed a strategy to increase the homologous recombination (HR) frequency by utilizing a reintegration vector [28], equated the efficacies of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated and TALEN-based homology-directed repair (HDR), made an easily screen-able platform, and established three different HDR methods for site-specific mutagenesis [29].

Two different types of parent flies were developed; one was developed with the Cas9 gene under the germline specific promoter, and another was developed, expressing sgRNA in a constitutive manner. The crossing of these parents produced progenies with a transmitted mutation in the germlines. In a similar way, a gRNA-encoding DNA vector was injected into the Cas9-positive transgenic flies which permitted the knockin or knockout of various genes targets [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Different approaches have been tried to achieve the induction of HDR in flies for example, a gRNA plasmid and donor repair template were injected into transgenic Cas9 embryos [37], while the transgenic embryos containing a sgRNA and Cas9 were injected with a donor template plasmid. All of these three components containing the Cas9 gene, sgRNA and donor repair template in a plasmid form were delivered into non-transgenic flies [38,39].

A comparison was then made among the different approaches of facilitating HDR utilizing the same donor plasmid and gRNA, and it was observed that the use of non-transgenic individuals produced lower frequencies of the knockin ones when they were compared to the transgenic ones [40]. A mutagenic chain reaction (MCR) method was developed by Gantz et al. in 2015 that could lead to autocatalytic mutations, and they utilized this process for the conversion of mutations from heterozygous to homozygous forms [41]. The CRISPR/Cas9 technique was applied for the introduction of a site-specific mutation in the Dα6 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). The resistance level for Spinosad-based insecticide for the flies with a Dα6-null mutation was higher than that of the site-specific mutation, and it was demonstrated that the site-specific mutation is directly related to spinosad resistance [42]. Studies have also focused on the altered phenotypes, which were obtained after the knockout of specific genes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system [43].

To show the direct relation between the efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system and the concentration of sgRNA, the yellow gene was studied, however, the use of increased sgRNA concentrations reduced the adult survival rate [44]. The yellow gene was also targeted by Yu et al. 2013, and a great increase in the editing efficiency was demonstrated [45]. Through the CRISPR/Cas9 system, researchers introduced site-specific mutations into the white (w) gene of the D. melanogaster and sex-lethal (Sxl) genes of D. suzukii. The phenotype which was obtained by the mutation in the eyes was produced at a low efficiency, and this might have happened because the sgRNA and Cas9-encoding plasmids DNA were injected into the flies, and here, the plasmid DNA needs to be transcribed in vivo, which is not the case with mRNA. Additionally, the specificity of the Drosophila species and the white gene may have led to this low efficiency. Mutant females of the Sxl gene demonstrated abnormal genitalia and reproductive tissues [46]. The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation in the alpha subunit of succinyl-CoA synthetase/ligase (Scsα) in Drosophila revealed that Scsα deficiency displayed developmental delays, increased mortality under starvation conditions and impaired locomotor activity [47]. Hence, for energy metabolism in Drosophila, the Scsα gene is vital. Asaoka et al. used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to create flies lacking a linear ubiquitin E3 ligase (LUBEL). When these LUBEL-deficient flies were exposed to heat, defective climbing and a reduced survival rate was observed [48].

Further, the utilization of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for vital gene mutation such as the clamp gene, troponin C (TpnC), Alk gene, Sex-lethal (Sxl) and white (w) gene in Drosophila has laid a strong foundation for the development of sustainable pest management strategies [49,50,51,52,53]. The sterile insect technique (SIT) is a pest management approach that includes rearing, sterilizing and releasing the sterilized males of the target insect species. The sterile insect technique is an environmentally friendly and successful strategy for pest control. It is a tool that can be used for elementary research on the reproductive biology of pests. The integration of SIT with CRISPR–Cas genome editing might create optimal SIT strains [54,55]. The site-specific editing of the white gene by directly delivering the purified Cas9 protein in the embryo of the D. suzukii simplified the gene editing. For the generation of heritable genetic modifications, a recombinant Cas9 protein could be a way of choice. Choo et al. in 2017 generated a CRISPR/Cas-mediated series of frameshift mutations, leading to genetic sexing strains in Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt). The knowledge from this study could be exploited for SIT-based pest control [56]. In context to SIT, the system of sperm marking helps to monitor the pest population. In D. suzukii, a sperm-marking transgenic strain was developed by using endogenous promoters of D. suzukii in 2019 [57]. The Ds hsp70 promoter is used to derive the expression of Cas9 and a small nuclear RNA gene U6 promoter for the expression of gRNA. In this particular study, the co-injections of the helper plasmid were found to be more effective over the preformed RNPs that had been used previously in HRD-based GE [58]. The CRISPR/Cas9-mutated white (w-) gene in D. suzukii caused a copulation failure. It also caused a pigmentation deficiency in the testis sheath, which could be a probable reason for the copulation failure. This approach may, therefore, be capable of being used in pest management [57,59] (Figure 2A).

The Dipteran group, Tephritid, comprise destructive pests that are a threat to agricultural crops. Genetic approaches for pest management are very promising methods for tephritid population control. This involves genetic manipulations which enables the insect to transmit lethal traits or renders them sterile. Some examples of genetic pest management in tephritidae are mentioned below.

1.2.2. Anastrepha ludens 

Anastrepha ludens, which are also known as the Mexfl (North American Plant Protection Organization‘s Phytosanitary Alert System) belongs to the family of fruit flies. A. ludens is native to Central America and Mexico and is a chief pest of mango and agriculture in lower Rio Grande Valley, Mexico and Central America [60,61]. The species has a relatively long lifespan in comparison to other fruit fly species [62]. This quality is responsible for the aggressive invasion of Anastrepha spp. This genus poses a major threat to the yield of different species of fruit [63]. The Anastrepha genus is designated as one of three genera that cause a major risk to American agriculture [64]. As per the USDA, the Mexfly can cause an estimated damage of worth $1.44 billion in a 5-year time span. Recently, in 2019, Li. et al. used the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeting the sex determination gene, As-transformer-2 (Astra-2), through the embryonic injection of the RNP complex. They demonstrated that knocking out of this gene led to sterility in some males and intersexual phenotypes in XX chromosome females. Thus, exploring this sex determining gene (Astra-2) can be useful in pest control management [63].

1.2.3. Bactrocera dorsalis 

Bactrocera dorsalis is a destructive pest that is found in Asian countries. The white and transformer genes were mutated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The sgRNA targeted to the transformer gene, and the Cas9 mRNA were co-injected in the B. dorsalis embryos. The mutations in the transformer gene led to a male-biased sex ratio and as well as this, abnormal outer and interior reproductive organs were formed. These mutations were heritable in the next generation, and thus, this gene can be a suitable target for controlling this pest [65].

1.2.4. Ceratitis capitata

The Ceratitis capitata, which is also called as the Mediterranean fruit fly, is an aggressive polyphagous pest that is responsible for a huge amount of economic damage. Initially, the eGFP-to-BFP conversion approach demonstrated that the CRISPR–Cas HDR genome editing technique utilizing short and ssDNA repair templates was highly efficient in C. capitata. Possibly, this efficiency could save resources and time during mutagenic screening while targeting the gene which does not show any phenotypic alterations [66]. Meccariello et al. in 2017 targeted the segmentation paired gene (Ccprd) and the eye pigmentation gene white eye (we) in C. capitate using the CRISPR–Cas9 system [67].

1.3. Lepidoptera

Lepidoptera is one of the world’s most described species and comprises numerous taxa. Lepidopterans are the second most invasive pests of stored crop products, and thus, they have scientific and economic importance. Despite there being great interest in this group, there is unsatisfactory progress in the field of the genetic manipulation of them. Lepidopterans have devastating effects on crop yields. The overuse of chemicals to control the major Lepidopteran insect pests like Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera littoralis, Helicoverpa armigera and Plutella xylostella led to the development of resistance in the insects against the traditionally used pesticides. The two key reasons which explain the failure of the routine use of manipulative genetics in Lepidoptera were resistance for RNAi and sensitivity towards inbreeding [68,69]. Luckily, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GE provided a heritable and ecofriendly solution for pest management. The GE approaches in some of the insect pests belonging to this order are reviewed in this report [70].

1.3.1. Helicoverpa armigera

Insects depend on food for their sterol requirements as they are unable to synthesize it. NPC1b is an insect protein that has been identified as an integral membrane protein. The role of NPC1b in Drosophila melanogaster is an uptake of dietary cholesterol [71]. The CRISPR/Cas9-edited NPC1b mutant larvae were used to characterize the function of NPC1b in Helicoverpa armigera. NPC1b is vital for the growth and dietary cholesterol uptake of H. armigera, therefore, a limitation in the dietary uptake of cholesterol inhibits the weight gain and food ingestion of the insect. Thus, NPC1b can be a potential target for pest management. However, the technique might have some off-target effects [72]. Wang et al. used the CRISPR/Cas9 system in H. armigera and proved that Cry1Ac resistance relies on HaCad (which is also a key receptor of Cry1Ac). Instead of injecting plasmids coding the Cas9 and sgRNA, the eggs were injected with a mixture of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, and this resulted in a highly efficient editing of the HaCad locus. This study led towards the use of Bt toxins [73]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system also provided an innovative pest control approach against H. armigera by using the antagonist-mediated optimization of the time of mating which ensured maximum fecundity [74].

In H. punctigera and H. armigera, the Bt toxin Cry2Ab resistance was linked with a loss-of-function mutation in the ABC transporter gene (ABCA2). To confirm this co-relation between the Cry2Ab resistance in H. armigera and ABCA2 gene, HaABCA2 knockout strains were developed using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. The knockout strain obtained a significant level of resistance, and this confirmed the role of HaABCA2 in intermediating the toxicity of Cry2Ab and Cry2Aa against H. armigera [75]. In H. armigera, four pigment genes, namely, white, ok, brown and scarlet, were also mutated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system which further led to several physiologically altered phenotypes [76]. For a better understanding of insect-insecticide response and the management of agronomic pests, the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-out lines were made for the cluster of nine P450 genes in H. armigera. The study provided the basic information for the critical evaluation and identification of the main players in insecticide metabolism [77].

1.3.2. Plutella xylostella, Spodoptera, Dendrolimus punctatus and Cydia pomonella 

The extra cellular matrix (ECM) of an insect is made up of chitin and protein. Chitin is a naturally occurring amino-polysaccharide that is synthesized by the Chitin synthase 1 (CHS1) gene-encoded protein. Some common examples of chemicals that directly hinder chitin synthesis are Benzoylureas (BPUs), etoxazole and buprofezin. In the CHS1 gene, SNP was reported at position 1017, in which phenylalanine (F) replaced isoleucine (I), and this change was related to etoxazole resistance [78]. Another study on the mutation in the CHS1 gene of Plutella xylostella by Douris et al., in 2016 elaborated that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can convincingly elucidate the molecular mode of action of the CHS1-inhibiting bioactive molecules. The same research group also demonstrated a mutation in the PxCHS1 gene which was responsible for the resistance against benzoylureas (BPUs) in P. xylostella [79].

The homeotic gene abdominal-A of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) [80], and the Fall Armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda [81], was targeted using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The double sex (PxDSX) gene of the P. xylostella responsible for sex determination in the insect was targeted using the CRISPR/Cas9 system which led to the altered expression of the sex-biased genes [82]. A disruption in the normal functioning of the vital genes by an induced series of deletions and insertions in the genomic locus using the CRISPR/Cas9 system provided the groundwork for the development of new tools for pest management. In a report on Lepidopteran pests, Spodoptera litura CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis targeted the Slabd-A gene (S. litura abdominal-A). The Slabd-A gene has a central role in abdominal segmentation and segment identity determination in insects. Thus, Slabd-A is involved in embryonic development, and therefore, targeting this gene for genome manipulation resulted in ectopic pigmentation and anomalous segmentation [83]. A study on S. litura demonstrated that SlitBLOS2 gene knockout led to a complete disappearance of the white spots and yellow strips on the larval integument, and thus, this provided a marker gene for functional studies and pest control strategies [84].

The most essential odor-binding proteins are PBPs (Pheromone Binding Proteins) [85]. To demonstrate the function of the PBP gene in S. litura, the PBP3 gene (SlitPBP3) was mutated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The response of the obtained SlitPBP3 mutants was compared with that of the wild-type individuals, and the mutants exhibited a reduced response to sex pheromone components [86]. The knockouts of the olfactory receptor co-receptor (Orco) gene of Spodoptera littoralis were acquired using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. These knockouts were not able to respond to sex pheromones and plant odors [87]. Recently, a study was conducted which targeted three genes in S. frugiperda. The three target genes included two marker genes tryptophan 2, 3-dioxygenase (TO), the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 subunit 2 (BLOS2), and one developmental gene, E93 (a key ecdysone-induced TF promoting development in adult insects). This study envisioned the method using multiple sgRNA injections, and the results have a possible use in functional gene characterization and high-throughput functional genomics screening for an in-depth understanding of the complex mechanisms regulating the crucial pathways of FAW and other invasive pests. In S. exigua, the functional validation of Seα6-KO (Homozygous strain) was performed using the CRISPR/Cas9 system [88].

1.3.3. Dendrolimus punctatus 

Dendrolimus punctatus, which is commonly called the Pine Caterpillar Moth, has a devastating effect on the resin production of Southeast Asia and China. The embryo development process is well known to have an association with the Dpwnt-1 gene for early body planning. A CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation in the DpWnt-1 gene in D. punctatus greatly altered the gene expression, which led to abnormal growth and deformed organ development. In this study, a mixture of EGFP expressing gene cassette and sgRNA/Cas9 mRNA was used for the embryonic injection [89].

1.3.4. Cydia pomonella

The Codling Moth, Cydia pomonella, is a major pome fruit pest. The odorant receptor of C. pomonella (CpomOR1) was targeted using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The CpomOR1 gene expresses at a high quantity in the antennae which encodes the codlemone receptor (an odorant receptor). In this study, early-stage eggs were injected with sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA. The emerging female with the knockout CpomOR1 gene was allowed to mate with a normal male, and the researchers observed that their fecundity and fertility were affected as they produced non-viable eggs [90].

1.3.5. Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

It is a major agricultural pest in Asia that primarily feeds on corn crops. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to understand the function of a developmental gene. The knockout study of the Ago1 gene was performed in O. furnacalis (OfAgo1). In this study, an sgRNA/Cas9 mRNA mix was injected in newly laid eggs. In the hatched larvae, the loss of function of the OfAgo1 gene disrupted the cuticle pigment of the seventh abdominal and third thoracic segments. This finding reveals the role of this gene for cuticle pigmentation [91]. Future studies in respect of pest control can be performed by following the insect rearing and transfection methods for this insect.

1.3.6. Agrotis ipsilon

It is also known that the Black Cutworm is a harmful pest that feeds on almost all of the important vegetables and grains. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was used for developing the mutants for the tyrosine hydroxylase (AiTH) gene. A mixture of sgRNA and Ca9 mRNA was microinjected in fresh eggs, and they were incubated until they were ready for hatching. Furthermore, the sgRNA and Ca9 mRNA-injected egg groups were observed by the narrowing of the eggshell that led to a failure in the hatching in most of the eggs. Additionally, if they did hatch, the larva was severely dehydrated and died after one day [92].

1.3.7. Hyphantria cunea

Hyphantria cunea (Fall Webworm), Drury, is an invasive pest that feeds on important fruits and crop fields worldwide. Li et al. targeted double sex (Hcdsx) gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, and the mutants were observed to have abnormal external genitalia and incomplete sex reversal phenotypes. This led to a reduced sex-specific fecundity. In the same report, the alternative splicing pattern of the Hcdsx gene was also altered using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, and the alterations in the splicing pattern changed the downstream gene expression of vg1, vg2 (encoding vitellogenin) and pheromone binding protein 1, which in turn led to the development of sex-specific sterile phenotypes in the Hcdsx mutants [93].

1.3.8. Mythimna separata 

Mythimna separata (Walker) is a phytophagous pest that has been recently targeted for GE for the first time. Tang et al. in 2022 optimized the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system by targeting the NPC1b gene. The NPC1 family proteins are involved in intestinal absorption and sterol trafficking. The eggs were microinjected with Cas9 protein and sgRNA (RNP complex). The optimized methods from this study can be exploited for the designing of novel pest control strategies [94].

1.4. Hemiptera

The order Hemiptera includes insects of the three major suborders Auchenorrhyncha (Spittlebugs, Cicadas, Planthoppers and Leafhoppers), Heteroptera and Sternorrhyncha (Whiteflies and Aphids) which feed almost entirely on plant sap. These insects have adapted to a wide range of diets. Hemiptera is the insect order with the common name of bugs (as flies represent the Diptera). The main features of Hemipteran insects are the sucking and piercing mouthparts. Various control strategies have been applied to control the hemipteran insects. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic alterations have shown remarkable potential in providing a simple and heritable approach in the field of pest management and functional studies of the Hemipteran pests.

1.4.1. Nilaparvata lugen

Nilaparvata lugens which are also known as the Brown Planthopper is a highly destructive insect pest in Asia, and given that it is highly fertile, it causes great agricultural losses by sap sucking rice plants and also by transmitting various viruses. For removing the constraints in the field of functional genomic studies, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to target two eye pigmentation genes, namely, the cinnabar gene (Nl-cn) and the white gene (Nl-w) of N. lugens. These genes were knocked out and further validated by an RNAi-based knockdown analysis. This capability of introducing precise genetic alterations provides alternative means for understanding the gene function and establishing new approaches for pest control in this non-model pest [95].

1.4.2. Diaphorina citri, Homalodisca vitripennis, Bemisia argentifolii and Bemisia tabaci

Diaphorina citri (Asian citrus psyllid) acts as a vector for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), a pathogenic bacterium. When the psyllid feeds on the citrus plants, it causes the transmission of a disease that is known as Huanglongbing (HLB). Hunter et al. in 2018 made an effort to improve the delivery of the CRISPR components by the addition of Branched Amphiphilic Peptide Capsules, BAPC. Injecting the gene-editing components near the insect ovaries led to the production of a heritable germline with the edited genome in the subsequent generations. It has bypassed the requirement of microinjecting the eggs [96]. Later, in 2019, Hunter et al. utilized this BAPC-assisted-CRISPR–Cas9 method for gene targeting and gene editing in insect nymphs and adult insects (Psyllids—Diaphorina citri; Leafhoppers—Homalodisca vitripennis; Whitefly—Bemisia argentifolii). The two genes that were targeted for the knockouts were the Vermillion, Vm, and the thioredoxin gene, TXT. The knockouts changed their eye color and physiology, respectively. The insects that were selected for this study are a threat to food security as they transmit pathogenic bacteria and viruses to plants worldwide. The idea behind the development of this strategy was to change the vectors into non-vectors. The results were them having a reduced lifespan, slower development, reduced fecundity and it changed their eye phenotype. BAPC-assisted CRISPR delivery reformed the approaches to protect food crops from different pathogens and insect vectors [97]. Recently, in 2020, a study was performed on B. tabaci, demonstrating the development of a CRISPR–Cas9 based gene editing technique in which the vitellogenic adult females were injected with the CRISPR/Cas9 components rather than the embryos. Here, the Cas9 protein was fused with an ovary-targeting peptide ligand (‘‘BtKV’’), leading to efficient and heritable gene editing in the genome of the offspring. These adult injections were easy to administer and there was no need for specialized tools [98] (Figure 2C).

1.4.3. Euschistus heros 

In Euschistus heros, the Neotropical brown stink bug, three genes yellow (yel), tyrosine hydroxylase (th) and abnormal wing disc (awd) were targeted through RNAi to study the gene function. The awd gene knockdown insects had deformed wings and the th gene targeted insects had a lighter cuticle pigmentation. Thus, the RNAi-mediated targeting revealed that distinct malformed phenotypes are linked to both of the genes, but no distinct phenotype was observed for the yel gene. Further, to understand the function of this gene in this insect, the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout technique was developed. However, still there was no distinct phenotype differences in yel gene mutant insect when they were compared to normal insects. For this study, the yel gene-targeting RNP complex was microinjected in the eggs, and the hatched larvae were observed for the altered phenotype studies [99].

1.5. Coleoptera

Coleopteran comprise of the largest order of insecta. In this order, the most common pests of the stored crop products are found. The adult insect of coleoptra have forewings that are modified as hard elytra. They include beetles which inhabit an ample variety of habitats.

1.5.1. Tribolium castaneum

Tribolium castaneum, which is also called the Red Flour Beetle, is a pest of stored grains and other agricultural products. They lower the nutritional value of the crop. Their secretions possess carcinogens like benzoquinone. The availability of the genomic database of T. castaneum [100,101] has upgraded the T. castaneum eradication methods from traditional fumigation to the genome editing-based methods. These new methodologies can expand pest management and diminish the damage that is caused to the environment. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was applied to T. castaneum for the first time [102]. In this report, Gilles et al. established that a mutated E-cadherin gene led to dorsal closure defects. Gilles’ group also attained a homology-directed knockin using the CRISPR system, which turned out to be very efficient [103]. Subsequently, this GE system can be used for various species, providing basic information for launching CRISPR-centered transgenic techniques. This could minimize the development-associated voids between the non-model organisms and the model organisms [104].

1.5.2. Leptinotarsa decemlineata

In January 2020, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was used for the first time in the Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Initially, the vestigial gene (vest) was functionally characterized in CPB through RNAi, which was followed by the establishment of the CRISPR/Cas9 protocol in CPB for the mutagenesis study. The RNAi-induced phenotype of deformed wings reappeared in the vest gene mutants, and this was also developed using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. In this mutagenesis study, the RNP complex was microinjected in <1 h old eggs, and they were further incubated until they were ready for hatching. Altogether, this report provided an improved environmentally friendly pest management methodology [105].

1.6. Orthoptera

Orthoptera possess chewing and biting mouthparts, and they damage the crop by biting off different plant parts. The type of damage that is caused by Orthoptera is the direct damage to the plant, and it is not indirect damage. The damage is visible, and it is similar to the damage that is caused by grubs and caterpillars.

Locusta migratoria 

Locusta migratoria is also called the locust, and its breakouts pose an unprecedented threat to agriculture, and thus, to the livelihood and food supply of millions of people. The classical eradication policies to deal with locust breakouts depend on chemical insecticides, which take a toll on the farmers’ pockets as well as on the environment. Locusts are considered to be important by scientists for molecular studies also. The developmental synchronization among the migration, social behavior and copulation patterns of the insect act as the foundation in determining the density of the locusts [106]. The insects’ behavioral responses such as mating, feeding, foraging and spawning are directed by the brain. The pheromones are perceived by the peripheral tissues, processed in the nerve tissue and they are passed on to the sensory organs like the olfactory and others. Finally, the brain receives and integrates these signals, thus, the olfactory plays a vital role in insects. To obtain a better insight on the functional genes of Locusta migratoria, the odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco) gene was targeted by the CRISPR/Cas9 system, and consequently, high mutation rates were achieved. The results suggested novel strategies for locust control, and also, the frame of this study may be used in controlling other insects of the same clade such as crickets [107].

1.7. Acarina

The family Acaridae is a pest of cereal products and stored grains, having blunt, toothed chelicerae, enabling them to gouge and scrape the plant material.

Tetranychus urticae 

A successful genetic transformation or genome editing is yet to be established for chelicerates. Some tick and mite species within this group are of great economic and agricultural importance. Accessibility to a well-developed genome-editing tool would be a significant improvement in this area. The spider mite Tetranychus urticae is a polyphagous pest. They transmit viruses and travel by water and wind. The insecticides such as pyrimidinamines, quinazolines, pyrazoles and pyridazinones block the quinone binding receptor of mitochondrial respiratory complex I in the T. urticae. These chemicals are categorized as mitochondrial electron transport inhibitors (METIs). In the T. urticae strain which are resistant to these, the METIs were identified with a mutation in the PSST homolog of the complex I [108]. It was demonstrated that substitution in the H92R amino acid of the PSST homolog is responsible for their resistance against pyridaben. In 2020, Phytoene desaturase gene mutants of T. urticae were developed through an injection of RNP complex into the ovary of virgin females. The mutation caused albino phenotypes in subsequent progenies. This research provided an impetus for the genetic transformation of chelicerates and paved the way for functional studies using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in T. urticae [109].

2. The CRISPR/Cas9 System in Pest Management: Challenges and Future Prospects

In the past decade, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as an elegant and affordable genetic technique, and it is expected to be extensively applied in pest control applications for crop improvement in the near future [88]. Even after the rapid progression in the field of the CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing methods, researchers are facing challenges such as off-target effects, efficient delivery methods and genome editing efficiency. Despite these challenges, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has the potential for revolutionizing the field of agriculture. Now, there is a need to focus on the improvement of the CRISPR/Cas9-based pest management technologies such as combining the SIT with the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which has great pest control capabilities as it targets the reproductive fitness of them (Figure 2B). Similarly, the utilization of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for transcription regulation could be a promising technique, but the genetically modified organism in such cases will not be “transgene-free” as it will carry a transgene for dead Cas9 (dCas9) and gRNA expression cassette. Recently, one more novel approach has been explored which involves the transportation of the injected RNP complex which is assisted by the ovary-targeting peptide ligand or BAPC in nymphs and adult flies. Using this method, the CRISPR components can be directly injected near the ovary of an adult female fly, thus making it more convenient when it is compared to the microinjections in the eggs or embryos (Figure 2C). This approach has a lot of scope, and this similar concept can be applied in other insect orders for pest management.

3. Discussion

Plant pests are likely to have considerable effects on the crop distribution, density, yield and crop spread as a result of climate change. Pesticides act as a vital tool for pest management and their consumption across the world is reported to be over four million tons per year [108]. As per the FAO, crop destruction by insect pests leads to the starvation of millions of people. Over and above one thousand pesticides are existing presently in the market including microbial formulations, chemical ones, semi-chemical ones, herbal ones and others. The persistence of pesticides in the environment poses a worldwide threat to human well-being and ecological systems. Thus, the development of alternative pest management strategies is the need of today. The development of new integrated pest management strategies is required, which have zero side effects on the non-target insect population and lead to effective pest control which further can ensure crop improvement and food safety.

Table 1

CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in various insects.

Insect Species	Target Gene	Accession Number	Genetic Trait	Mutation Type	Delivery of CRISPR Components	Findings	References
Drosophila melanogaster	yellow, rosy	NM_057444.3, NM_079613.3	Pigmentation and Mating	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid	This was the first report using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to mediate efficient genome engineering in Drosophila.	Gratz et al., 2013
	yellow, white	NM_057444.3, NM_079613.3	Pigmentation and Mating	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA	sgRNA concentration-dependant knockout was shown for yellow gene, and highly efficient and varied genome editing efficiencies were shown by different sgRNAs.	Bassett et al., 2013
	yellow	NM_057444.3	Pigmentation and Mating	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and gRNA	This report used the approach of targeting multiple genes with different sgRNAs, and it attained a remarkably effective targeted mutagenesis.	Yu et al., 2013
	Ast, Eh, capa, Ccap, Crz, npf, Mip, mir-219, mir-315, white	NM_001300582.1, NM_079662.3, NM_079828.3, NM_001275917.2, NM_079626.3, NM_080493.3, NM_140714.4, NR_048289.1, NR_048297.1, X76202.1		Knockout	Plasmid	To obtain a Cas9–sgRNA complex for achieving targeted mutagenesis, two transgene vectors harboring expression cassettes for Cas9 and sgRNA were delivered.	Kondo and Ueda, 2013
	rosy, DSH3PX1	NM_079613.3, NM_140091.4	Pigmentation and Mating	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid	Executed efficient and complex genomic manipulations using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR.	Gratz et al., 2014
	ebony, yellow, wingless, wnt	NM_079707.4, NM_057444.3, NM_078778.5	Segmentation	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid	Different promoters were used to drive sgRNA expression, and based on promoter properties, different patterns of expression were observed.	Port et al., 2014
	EGFP, mRFP		Chromogenic fluorophores	Knockout	Plasmid	Induction of mutations by injection of an sgRNA into Vasa-Cas9 transgenic fly embryos.	Sebo et al., 2014
	white, piwi	NM_057439.2, NM_001298896.1	Pigmentation and Expression of group of small RNA	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid	Used Cas9 nickase and sgRNA pairs to prevent off-target effects during the generation of indel mutants.	Ren et al., 2014 [110]
	ms(3)k81, white, yellow	NM_143253.2, NM_057439.2, NM_057444.3	Pigmentation	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid	CRISPR mediated genome editing was shown in Drosophila.	Xue et al., 2014a
	yellow, notch, bam, nos,ms(3)k81, cid	NM_057444.3, NM_001258581.2, NM_057452.4, NM_057310.4, NM_143253.2, NM_079006.4	Physiology	Knockout	Plasmid	A CRISPR/Cas9-mediated conditional mutagenesis system combined with tissue-specific expression of Cas9 was used to temporally and spatially inhibit gene expression.	Xue et al., 2014b
	salm	NM_164966.3	Zinc Finger Transcriptional Repressor	Knockin	mRNA, transgene	For flexible modification of fly genome, a two-step method was proposed.	Zhang X. et al., 2014
	ebony, yellow, vermilion	NM_079707.4, NM_057444.3, NM_078558.3	Pigmentation	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid, transgene	Donor template and sgRNA plasmids were injected into Cas9 transgenic embryos in Drosophila.	Ren et al., 2014b
	ebony, yellow, white	NM_079707.4, NM_057444.3, NM_057439.2	Pigmentation	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid, transgene	A bicistronic Cas9/sgRNA vector was constructed which enhanced the efficiency of gene targeting.	Gokcezade et al., 2014
	ebony, yellow, wg, wls, Lis1, Se	NM_079707.4, NM_057444.3, NM_078778.5, NM_140188.4, NM_057812.5, NM_139978.4, NM_057812.5	Pigmentation and Physiology	Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid, transgene	Non-transgenic individuals exhibited lessefficient knockin than transgenic individuals did.	Port et al., 2015 [111]
	yellow	NM_057444.3	Pigmentation	Knockin	Transgene	Heterozygous recessive mutation was converted to homozygous loss of function mutations utilizing mutagenic chain reaction (MCR) technology in Drosophila.	Gantz and Bier, 2015
	Dα6	NM_164874.3	Insecticide resistance	Knockin	Plasmid	The G275E mutation of the nAChR Dα6 subunit is directly related to Spinosad resistance.	Zimmer et al., 2016
	LUBEL	NM_001273232.2	Growth and Development	Knockout	Plasmid	Flies with LUBEL mutations exhibited reduced survival and defective climbing in response to heat.	Asaoka et al., 2016
	Scsα	NM_079181.4	Growth and Development	Knockout	Plasmid	Mutant flies could not produce sufficient energy to promote normal growth.	Quan et al., 2017
	clamp	NM_136293.4	Sex Specific	Knockout	Plasmid	The expression of a sex-specific gene was regulated by an essential transcription factor.	Urban et al., 2016
	chameau, CG4221, CG5961	NM_135273.5,NM_141949.4		Knockin	mRNA	HDR-mediated genome modifications efficiency was tested, and a problem associated with “ends-in” recombination was resolved.	Yu et al., 2014
	fdl	NM_165908.2		Knockout	Plasmid	Capability of CRISPR/Cas9 system for analysing or manipulating protein glycosylation pathways.	Mabashi-Asazuma et al., 2015 [112]
	mod(mdg4)	NM_163878.2		Knockout	Plasmid	Validation of a functional gene involved in trans-splicing that influenced the development in flies.	Gao et al., 2015 [113]
	act5C, lig4, mus308	NM_167053.2, NM_132679.3, L76559.1		Knockout, Knockin	Plasmid, transgene	Offered a comprehensive technique for genome editing in Drosophila S2 cells.	Kunzelmann et al., 2016 [114]
	yellow, white, tan	NM_057444.3, NM_057439.2, NM_132315.1	Pigmentation	Knockin	Plasmid, transgene	Proposed a new process of attaining single or multiple allelic substitutions.	Lamb et al., 2016
	wntless	NM_140188.4	Growth and development	Knockout	Plasmid	A complex of tRNA–sgRNA was proposed to amplify the cleavage efficiency of the Cpf1 and Cas9 nucleases.	Port and Bullock, 2016
	TpnC	NM_078895.4	Growth and development	Knockout	Plasmid	Confirmed that the myofibril assembly is related to TpnC gene.	Chechenova et al., 2017
	Alk	NM_144343.3	Growth and development	Knockout	Plasmid	Revealed that transcription factors can affect Alk gene expression by establishing mutations in Alk enhancer regions.	Mendoza-Garcia et al., 2017
Drosophila suzukii	white (w-)	NM_057439.2	Pigmentation	Knockout	Plasmid	Absence of mating and copulation failure was reported. The mutation also caused pigmentation deficiency in testis sheath, which could be a probable reason for copulation failure.	Yan et al., 2020
	white, Sxl	NM_057439.2, XM_017083263.2	Sex determination	Knockout	Plasmid	Sxl gene was proved as excellent gene to suppress the population growth of this destructive pest.	Li and Scott, 2016
	DsRed (red fluorescence protein)			knockin	Plasmid, transgene	The enhancer/promoter of the spermatogenesis-specific beta-2-tubulin (β2t) gene was used for expression of fluorescent proteins or effector molecules in testes of pests, and this providing basis for reproductive biology studies sexing and monitoring.	Ahmed, H. M. et al., 2019
Drosophila subobscura	yellow, white	XM_034814491.1, XM_034808177.1	Pigmentation	Knockout	mRNA	Gene functions were analyzed in a non-model Drosophila species.	Tanaka et al., 2016 [115]
Anastrepha ludens	Astra-2	EU024509.1	Sex determination	Knockout	RNP complex	The mutation caused sterility, thus, the target gene was proposed for helping in pest control.	Li et al., 2019
Bactrocera dorsalis	White and transformer	AY055817.1, KP342062.1	Sex determination and reproduction	Knockout	RNP complex	CRISPR/Cas9 mediated mutation of white and transformer genes caused various phenotypic effects.	Zhao et al., 2018
Ceratitis capitata	eGFP_gRNA2 eGFP_gRNA2 and 1 mM Scr7 eGFP_gRNA2b–Cas9 complexes with ssODN_BFP donor template		Homology directed repair	knockin	RNP complex and a single-stranded oligo donor	Conversion of eGFP-to-BFP was demonstrated for establishing an efficient HDR through CRISPR-based genome editing.	Aumann, R. A. et al., 2018
	white eye (we) paired gene (Ccprd)	X89933.1, XM_020858622.2	Segmentation	Knockout	RNP complex	A simple and highly efficient RNP complex-based genome editing approach was reported with the details of designing and preparation.	Meccariello, A. et al., 2017
Helicoverpa armigera	NPC1b	MK555324.1	Growth and dietary uptake of Cholesterol	Knockout	RNP complex	NPC1b is vital for the growth and dietary cholesterol uptake. Thus, a novel pest-management technique can be developed using NPC1b as an insecticidal target.	Zheng, J. C. et al., 2020
	HaCad	JX23382.1	cell–cell adhesion	Knockout	sgRNAs and Cas9 mRNA	sgRNAs and Cas9 mRNA were injected into the fresh eggs, and a high editing efficiency of the HaCad locus was achieved.	Wang, J. et al., 2016
	HaABCA2	KP259911.1	Regulation of enzymes	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA	The knockout of HaABCA2 confirmed the role of HaABCA2 in mediating toxicity of both Cry2Aa and Cry2Ab against H. armigera.	Wang, J. et al., 2017
	odorant receptor 16 (OR16)	KF768670.1	Olfaction	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA + sgRNA and RNP complex	The results represent the basis for novel olfactory-based strategies of pest population control.	Chang, H. et al., 2017
	white, ok, brown, and scarlet	XM_021344759.2, KU754490.1, KU754480.1, KU754478.1	Pigmentation	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA	The report represented differential distribution of eye pigments in the mutants; this finding may be helpful in elucidation of biosynthetic pathway.	Khan, S. A.,et al., 2017
	cluster of nine P450 genes	KM016735.1, R095600.1, KM016739.1, KM016740.1, DQ256407.1, KM016743.1, KM016741	Regulation of detoxifying enzymes	Knockout	Cas9 protein and multiple sgRNAs	The report identified the key players in the insecticide metabolism.	Wang, H. et al., 2018
Plutella xylostella	Pxabd-A	XM_011570968.3	Body segmentation	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA	CRISPR/Cas9 was used to target genes in P. xylostella for the first time which provided new ideas for pest control.	Huang et al., 2016
	Pxdsx	XM_048630440.1	Sex determination	Knockout	Microinjection of RNP complex	The results showed CRISPR/Cas9 system led to altered expression of sex biased genes.	Wang et al., 2019
	PxCHS1	AB271784.1	Development	Knockout	Plasmid	Description of the resistance management strategies for insect pests, it and explained the MoA behind the resistance using CRISPR/Cas9 system.	Douris et al., 2016
	LW		Locomotion	Knockout	RNP complex	The results showed weaker phototaxis and reduced locomotion, thus making it a helpful method for pest control	Chen et al., 2021 [116]
Spodoptera frugiperda	Sfabd-A	MH541836.1	Body segmentation	Knockout	RNP complex	The results showed that gene function validation and the understanding of resistance mechanism can be performed using CRISPR/Cas9 system which can lead to the development of novel pest management approaches.	Wu et al., 2018
	BLOS2 E93 TO	XM_035582273.2XM_050696092.1XM_050696079.1	Growth and development	Knockout	Cas9 protein and multiple sgRNAs	The developed mutants were helpful to understand the crucial pathways of S. frugiperda and the strategy can also applied for other invasive pests.	Zhu, G. H. et al., 2020 [117]
Spodoptera litura	Slabd-A	GCA_002706865.1	Body segmentation	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA	The direct injection of Cas9-coding mRNA and Slabd-A-specific sgRNA into the embryos of the S. litura led to the induction of the typical abd-A deficient phenotypes showing irregular segmentation and unusual pigmentation at the larval stage.	Bi, H. L. et al., 2016
	SlitBLOS2	XM_022977403.1	Molecular marker	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA	The study demonstrated that SlitBLOS2 has a role in the coloration of the integuments, and thus, it provided a marker gene for functional studies and pest control strategies.	Zhu, G. H. et al., 2017
Spodoptera littoralis	SlitOrco		Olfaction	Knockout	mRNA	The Orco gene was investigated in the insect Spodoptera littoralis. The results were helpful in making a pest control strategy and in gene function analysis.	Koutroumpa et al., 2016
Spodoptera exigua	Seα6	MN714701.1		Knockout	RNP complex	The study demonstrated that knocked-out Seα6 was highly resistant to insecticides.	Zuo et al., 2020
Dendrolimus punctatus	DpWnt-1	KU640201.1	Development and segmentation	Knockout	mRNA	Proved the necessity of DpWnt-1 signaling in appendage development and anterior segmentation.	Liu H. et al., 2017
Cydia pomonella	CpomOR1	FJ385021.1	Olfaction	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA	The report demonstrated mutation in the CpomOR1 gene via CRISPR/Cas9 affected the egg production and viability in the insect.	Garczynski, S. F. et al., 2017
Ostrinia furnacalis	OfAgo1		Growth and development	knockout	sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA	Mutation in OfAgo1 gene through CRISPR/Cas9 technology caused cuticle disruption.	You et al., 2019
Agrotis ipsilon	AiTH		Growth and development	Knockout	sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA	The AiTH gene knockout by CRISPR/Cas9 caused narrowing in the egg shell.	Yang et al., 2018
Hyphantria cunea	Hcdsx		Reproduction	Knockout	sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA	Knocked-out Hcdsx gene by CRISPR/Cas9 caused sex-specific sterility, thus making it a pest control method.	Li et al., 2020
Mythimna separata	NPC1b	MZ209049.1	Intestinal absorption and sterol trafficking	Knockout	RNP complex	Knockout of NPC1b can hamper nutrient absorption.	Tang et al. 2022
Nilaparvata Lugens	Nl-cn and Nl-w	MH105806.1	Pigmentation	Knockout	Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA	Two genes for eye pigmentation were targeted using CRISPR/Cas9, and the results paved path for gene-function interrogation.	Xue. et al., 2018
Diaphorina citri	ACP-TRX-2	XM_026831570.1	Physiology	Knockout	BAPC-assisted delivery of CRISPR components	The method incorporated BAPC-assisted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 into nymphs and adults, thus resulting an innovative breakthrough in gene editing, it and has shown a significant improvement over efforts using injection of eggs.	Hunter et al., 2018
Diaphorina citriHomalodisca vitripennis, Bemisia argentifolii	Thioredoxin and Vermillion	XM_046819472.1	Physiology andEye color	Knockout	BAPC, plasmid, dsRNA	The BAPC-assisted delivery system developed gene editing methods across the all hemipteran pests by permitting the use of nymphs and adults. BAPC-assisted CRISPR delivery transformed the approaches to protect food crops from different pathogens and insect vectors.	Hunteret al., 2019
Bemisia tabaci	white	XM_019053144.1	Pigmentation	Knockout	SgRNA + Cas9 protein fused with overy targeting peptide ligand (BtKV)	The method has significantly expanded the capability of CRISPR techniques for whitefly research.	Heu et al., 2020
Euschistus heros	abnormal wing disc (awd), tyrosine hydroxylase (th) and yellow (yel)	NP_001119625.1, XP_008182999.1, XP_001948479.1	Body segmentation and pattern	Knockdown and knockout	dsRNA, RNP complex	Use of RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 techniques for managing insect pests.	Cagliari et al., 2020
Tribolium castaneum	Tribolium E-cadherin	XM_961215.3	Dorsal closure defect	Knockout	Plasmid	Tribolium E-cadherin gene was targeted for knockout study.	Gilles et al., 2015
Leptinotarsa decemlineata	vestigial gene (vest)	XM_023168389.1	Growth and development	Knockout	RNP complex	Functionally characterized vest gene and CRISPR/Cas9 protocol was established for mutagenesis.	Gui, S. et al., 2020
Locusta migratoria	Orco	JN989549.1	Olfaction	Knockout	mRNA	Functional genetic studies of locusts by generation of loss-of-function mutation for managing insect pests.	Li Y. et al., 2016
Tetranychus urticae	PSST	KX806605.1		Knockout	Plasmid	Substitution in the H92R amino acid of the PSST homolog was related to pyridaben resistance and the mutation into the Drosophila PSST homolog using CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing tools.	Bajda et al., 2017
	phytoene desaturase	MF167355.1		Knockout	RNP complex	Induction of two mutagenetic events using CRISPR/Cas9 providing basis for functional studies.	Dermauw, W. et al., 2020

Author Contributions

S.S., S.R., S.P., G.S., S.K.U., G.M. and P.C.V. have conceived and planned this article and all the authors have reviewed it. S.S. and S.R. wrote the first draft; all authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approved for publication. Institutional Manuscript ID no. CSIR-NBRI_MS/2022/07/14.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

P.C.V. and G.M. are thankful to the SERB, Department of Science & Technology (DST), Govt. of India for the financial support (CRG/2020/001095). The authors would like to thank CSIR, National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow (U.P.), India for necessary support and facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Table

Figure 1. The figure shows various genes targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 for insect pests control.

Figure 2. Figure shows three different CRISPR-based genome-editing approaches for insect pests management. (A) pictorial representation of sterile insect technique (SIT); (B) targeting female reproductive fitness through CRISPR/Cas9; (C) injection of CRISPR/Cas9 components with ovary targeting signals for producing heritable genome editing in the germline.

References

1. FAOSTAT. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017.

2. Sun, D.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Progress and prospects of CRISPR/Cas systems in insects and other arthropods. Front. Physiol.; 2017; 8, 608. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00608]

3. Scheben, A.; Wolter, F.; Batley, J.; Puchta, H.; Edwards, D. Towards CRISPR/Cas crops–bringing together genomics and genome editing. New Phytol.; 2017; 216, pp. 682-698. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14702] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28762506]

4. Broekgaarden, C.; Snoeren, T.A.; Dicke, M.; Vosman, B. Exploiting natural variation to identify insect-resistance genes. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2011; 9, pp. 819-825. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00635.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21679292]

5. Chaerani, R.; Voorrips, R.E. Tomato early blight (Alternaria solani): The pathogen, genetics, and breeding for resistance. J. Gen. Plant. Pathol.; 2006; 72, pp. 335-347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10327-006-0299-3]

6. Flowers, T.J.; Yeo, A.R. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: Where next?. Funct. Plant. Biol.; 1995; 22, pp. 875-884. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1071/PP9950875]

7. Paszkowski, J.; Baur, M.; Bogucki, A.; Potrykus, I. Gene targeting in plants. EMBO J.; 1988; 7, pp. 4021-4026. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03295.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16453864]

8. Puchta, H.; Dujon, B.; Hohn, B. Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strand breaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res.; 1993; 21, pp. 5034-5040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.22.5034]

9. Upadhyay, S.K. Genome Engineering for Crop Improvement; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1-394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119672425]

10. Sushmita; Kaur, G.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Verma, P.C. An Overview of Genome-Engineering Methods. Genome Engineering for Crop Improvement; Upadhyay, S.K. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119672425.ch1]

11. Shimatani, Z.; Kashojiya, S.; Takayama, M.; Terada, R.; Arazoe, T.; Ishii, H.; Ezura, H. Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2017; 35, pp. 441-443. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3833]

12. Tang, X.; Lowder, L.G.; Zhang, T.; Malzahn, A.A.; Zheng, X.; Voytas, D.F.; Kirkland, E.R. A CRISPR–Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat. Plant.; 2017; 3, pp. 1-5.

13. Zong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, R.; Chen, K.; Ran, Y.; Gao, C. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2017; 35, 438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3811]

14. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A.; Charpentier, E. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science; 2012; 337, pp. 816-821. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22745249]

15. Rath, D.; Amlinger, L.; Rath, A.; Lundgren, M. The CRISPR-Cas immune system: Biology, mechanisms and applications. Biochimie; 2015; 117, pp. 119-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.025] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25868999]

16. Mao, Y.; Botella, J.R.; Zhu, J.K. Heritability of targeted gene modifications induced by plant-optimized CRISPR systems. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.; 2017; 74, pp. 1075-1093. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2380-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27677493]

17. Char, S.N.; Neelakandan, A.K.; Nahampun, H.; Frame, B.; Main, M.; Spalding, M.H.; Yang, B. An Agrobacterium-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 system for high-frequency targeted mutagenesis in maize. Plant. Biotechnol. J.; 2017; 15, pp. 257-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12611] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27510362]

18. Mir, A.; Alterman, J.F.; Hassler, M.R.; Debacker, A.J.; Hudgens, E.; Echeverria, D.; Brodsky, M.H.; Khvorova, A.; Watts, J.K.; Sontheimer, E.J. Heavily and fully modified RNAs guide efficient SpyCas9-mediated genome editing. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 2641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05073-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980686]

19. Handler, A.M. Prospects for using genetic transformation for improved SIT and new biocontrol methods. Genetica; 2002; 116, pp. 137-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020924028450] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12484533]

20. Heinrich, J.C.; Li, X.; Henry, R.A.; Haack, N.; Stringfellow, L.; Heath, A.C.G.; Scott, M.J. Germ-line transformation of the Australian sheep blowfly Luciliacuprina. Insect Mol. Biol.; 2002; 11, pp. 1-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1075.2001.00301.x]

21. Schetelig, M.F.; Caceres, C.; Zacharopoulou, A.; Franz, G.; Wimmer, E.A. Conditional embryonic lethality to improve the sterile insect technique in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Biol.; 2009; 7, 4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19173707]

22. Schetelig, M.F.; Wimmer, E.A. Insect transgenesis and the sterile insect technique. Insect Biotechnology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 169-194.

23. Schetelig, M.F.; Handler, A.M. Strategy for enhanced transgenic strain development for embryonic conditional lethality in Anastrephasuspensa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 9348-9353. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203352109]

24. Schetelig, M.F.; Targovska, A.; Meza, J.S.; Bourtzis, K.; Handler, A.M. Tetracycline-suppressible female lethality and sterility in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrephaludens. Insect Mol. Biol.; 2016; 5, pp. 500-508. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imb.12238] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135433]

25. Ogaugwu, C.E.; Schetelig, M.F.; Wimmer, E.A. Transgenic sexing system for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on female-specific embryonic lethality. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2013; 43, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.10.010]

26. Gantz, V.M.; Akbari, O.S. Gene editing technologies and applications for insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.; 2018; 28, pp. 66-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.05.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30551769]

27. Bassett, A.R.; Liu, J.L. CRISPR/Cas9 and genome editing in Drosophila. J. Genet. Genom.; 2014; 41, pp. 7-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.004]

28. Gratz, S.J.; Cummings, A.M.; Nguyen, J.N.; Hamm, D.C.; Donohue, L.K.; Harrison, M.M.; Wildonger, J.; O’Connor-Giles, K.M. Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-Guided Cas9 nuclease. Genetics; 2013; 194, pp. 1029-1035. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.152710]

29. Gratz, S.J.; Wildonger, J.; Harrison, M.M.; O’connor-Giles, K.M. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering and the promise of designer flies on demand. Fly; 2013; 7, pp. 249-255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/fly.26566] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24088745]

30. Baena-Lopez, L.A.; Alexandre, C.; Mitchell, A.; Pasakarnis, L.; Vincent, J.P. Accelerated hmologous recombination and subsequent genome modification in Drosophila. Development; 2013; 140, pp. 4818-4825. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24154526]

31. Yu, Z.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Zhu, N.; Guo, Y.; Yang, B.; Chang, Y.; Dai, F. et al. Various applications of TALEN- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination to modify the Drosophila genome. Biol. Open; 2014; 3, pp. 271-280. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.20147682] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24659249]

32. Kondo, S.; Ueda, R. Highly improved gene targeting by germline-specific Cas9 expression in Drosophila. Genetics; 2013; 195, pp. 715-721. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.156737] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24002648]

33. Port, F.; Chen, H.M.; Lee, T.; Bullock, S.L. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. E2967-E2976. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405500111] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002478]

34. Ren, X.; Yang, Z.; Mao, D.; Chang, Z.; Qiao, H.H.; Wang, X.; Sun, J.; Hu, Q.; Cui, Y.; Liu, L.P. et al. Performance of the Cas9 nickase system in Drosophila melanogaster. G3; 2014; 4, pp. 1955-1962. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.013821] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128437]

35. Sebo, Z.L.; Lee, H.B.; Peng, Y.; Guo, Y. A simplified and efficient germline-specific CRISPR/Cas9 system for Drosophila genomic engineering. Fly; 2014; 8, pp. 52-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/fly.26828]

36. Xue, Z.; Ren, M.D.; Wu, M.H.; Dai, J.B.; Rong, Y.K.S.; Gao, G.J. Efficient gene knock-out and knock-in with transgenic Cas9 in Drosophila. G3; 2014; 4, pp. 925-929. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.010496]

37. Xue, Z.; Wu, M.; Wen, K.; Ren, M.; Long, L.; Zhang, X.; Gao, G. CRISPR/Cas9 mediates efficient conditional mutagenesis in Drosophila. G3; 2014; 4, pp. 2167-2173. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.014159] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193494]

38. Zhang, X.; Koolhaas, W.H.; Schnorrer, F. A versatile two-step CRISPR-and RMCE-based strategy for efficient genome engineering in Drosophila. G3 Genes Genomes Genet.; 2014; 4, pp. 2409-2418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.013979] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25324299]

39. Gokcezade, J.; Sienski, G.; Duchek, P. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids for rapid and versatile genome editing in Drosophila. G3; 2014; 4, pp. 2279-2282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.014126] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25236734]

40. Port, F.; Muschalik, N.; Bullock, S.L. Systematic evaluation of Drosophila CRISPR tools reveals safe and robust alternatives to autonomous gene drives in basic research. G3; 2015; 5, pp. 1493-1502. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.019083]

41. Gantz, V.M.; Bier, E. The mutagenic chain reaction: A method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science; 2015; 348, pp. 442-444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5945]

42. Zimmer, C.T.; Garrood, W.T.; Puinean, A.M.; Eckel-Zimmer, M.; Williamson, M.S.; Davies, T.G.; Bass, C. A CRISPR/Cas9 mediated point mutation in the alpha 6 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor confers resistance to spinosad in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 73, pp. 62-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.04.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117524]

43. Douris, V.; Denecke, S.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Bass, C.; Nauen, R.; Vontas, J. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome modification to understand the genetic basis of insecticide resistance: Drosophila and beyond. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.; 2020; 167, 104595. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104595] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527434]

44. Bassett, A.R.; Tibbit, C.; Ponting, C.P.; Liu, J.L. Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell. Rep.; 2013; 4, pp. 220-228. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.020]

45. Yu, Z.; Ren, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Rong, Y.S.; Jiao, R.; Gao, G. Highly efficient genome modifications mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in Drosophila. Genetics; 2013; 195, pp. 289-291. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.153825]

46. Li, F.; Scott, M.J. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the white and Sex lethal loci in the invasive pest, Drosophila suzukii. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2016; 469, pp. 911-916. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.081] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721433]

47. Quan, X.; Sato-Miyata, Y.; Tsuda, M.; Muramatsu, K.; Asano, T.; Takeo, S.; Aigaki, T. Deficiency of succinyl-CoA synthetase alpha subunit delays development, impairs locomotor activity and reduces survival under starvation in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2017; 483, pp. 566-571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.105] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28017724]

48. Asaoka, T.; Almagro, J.; Ehrhardt, C.; Tsai, I.; Schleiffer, A.; Deszcz, L. Linear ubiquitination by LUBEL has a role in Drosophila heat stress response. EMBO Rep.; 2016; 17, pp. 1624-1640. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642378] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27702987]

49. Lamb, A.M.; Walker, E.A.; Wittkopp, P.J. Tools and strategies for scarless allele replacement in Drosophila using CRISPR/Cas9. Fly; 2016; 11, pp. 53-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2016.1220463] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494619]

50. Urban, J.A.; Doherty, C.A.; Jordan, W.T., III; Bliss, J.E.; Feng, J.; Soruco, M.M.; Rieder, L.E.; Tsiarli, M.A.; Larschan, E.N. The essential Drosophila CLAMP protein differentially regulates non-coding roX RNAs in male and females. Chromosome Res.; 2016; 25, pp. 101-113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-016-9541-9]

51. Chechenova, M.B.; Maes, S.; Oas, S.T.; Nelson, C.; Kiani, K.G.; Bryantsev, A.L. Functional redundancy and nonredundancy between two Troponin C isoforms in Drosophila adult muscles. Mol. Biol. Cell.; 2017; 28, pp. 760-770. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e16-07-0498]

52. Mendoza-Garcia, P.; Hugosson, F.; Fallah, M.; Higgins, M.L.; Iwasaki, Y.; Pfeifer, K.; Wolfstetter, G.; Varshney, G.; Popichenko, D.; Gergen, J.P. et al. The Zic family homologueOdd-paired regulates Alk expression in Drosophila. PLoS Genet.; 2017; 13, e1006617. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006617]

53. Knipling, E.F. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J. Econ. Entomol.; 1955; 48, pp. 459-462. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/48.4.459]

54. Dyck, V.A.; Hendrichs, J.; Robinson, A.S. Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2006.

55. Kalajdzic, P.; Schetelig, M.F. CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene editing using purified protein in D rosophilasuzukii. Entomol. Exp. Appl.; 2017; 164, pp. 350-362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eea.12599]

56. Choo, A.; Crisp, P.; Saint, R.; O’Keefe, L.V.; Baxter, S.W. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the white gene in the tephritid pest Bactroceratryoni. J. Appl. Entomol.; 2018; 142, pp. 52-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jen.12411]

57. Sim, S.B.; Kauwe, A.N.; Ruano, R.E.; Rendon, P.; Geib, S.M. The ABCs of CRISPR in Tephritidae: Developing methods for inducing heritable mutations in the genera Anastrepha, Bactrocera and Ceratitis. Insect Mol. Biol.; 2019; 28, pp. 277-289. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imb.12550] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30422347]

58. Ahmed, H.M.; Hildebrand, L.; Wimmer, E.A. Improvement and use of CRISPR/Cas9 to engineer a sperm-marking strain for the invasive fruit pest Drosophila suzukii. BMC Biotechnol.; 2019; 19, 85. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-019-0588-5]

59. Yan, Y.; Ziemek, J.; Schetelig, M.F. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated disruption of the white gene leads to pigmentation deficiency and copulation failure in Drosophila suzukii. J. Insect Physiol.; 2020; 126, 104091. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104091] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745561]

60. Stone, A. The Fruitflies of the Genus Anastrepha. USDA Miscellaneous Publications: 1942; 439.

61. Aluja, M. Bionomics and Management of Anastrepha. Annu. Rev. Entomol.; 1994; 39, pp. 155-178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.001103]

62. Weens Jr., H.V.; Heppner, J.B.; Gary, J. Steck. Mexican Fruit Fly (Anastrephaludens); Featured Creatures Entomology & Nematology Department. University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2019.

63. Li, J.; Handler, A.M. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in an exogenous transgene and an endogenous sex determination gene in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrephasuspensa. Gene; 2019; 691, pp. 160-166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.12.055]

64. United States Department of Agriculture. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Fruit Fly Exclusion and Detection Program. Fruit Fly Exclusion and Detection Strategic Plan FY 2019–2023; Washington, DC, USA, 2019; 1.

65. Zhao, S.; Xing, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yan, R. Efficient somatic and germline genome engineering of Bactrocera dorsalis by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2019; 75, pp. 1921-1932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5305] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30565410]

66. Aumann, R.A.; Schetelig, M.F.; Häcker, I. Highly efficient genome editing by homology-directed repair using Cas9 protein in Ceratitis capitata. Insect Mol. Biol.; 2018; 101, pp. 85-93. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.08.004]

67. Meccariello, A.; Monti, S.M.; Romanelli, A.; Colonna, R.; Primo, P.; Inghilterra, M.G.; Patti, F. Highly efficient DNA-free gene disruption in the agricultural pest Ceratitis capitata by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 10061. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10347-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855635]

68. Terenius, O.; Papanicolaou, A.; Garbutt, J.S.; Eleftherianos, I.; Huvenne, H.; Kanginakudru, S.; Bebas, P. RNA interference in Lepidoptera: An overview of successful and unsuccessful studies and implications for experimental design. J. Insect Physiol.; 2011; 57, pp. 231-245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.11.006]

69. Kolliopoulou, A.; Swevers, L. Recent progress in RNAi research in Lepidoptera: Intracellular machinery, antiviral immune response and prospects for insect pest control. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.; 2014; 6, pp. 28-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2014.09.019]

70. Li, J.J.; Shi, Y.; Wu, J.N.; Li, H.; Smagghe, G.; Liu, T.X. CRISPR/Cas9 in lepidopteran insects: Progress, application and prospects. J. Insect Physiol.; 2021; 135, 104325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2021.104325] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743972]

71. Voght, S.P.; Fluegel, M.L.; Andrews, L.A.; Pallanck, L.J. Drosophila NPC1b promotes an early step in sterol absorption from the midgut epithelium. Cell. Metab.; 2007; 5, pp. 195-205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.01.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17339027]

72. Zheng, J.C.; Yue, X.R.; Kuang, W.Q.; Li, S.L.; Tang, R.; Zhang, Z.F.; Jing, X. NPC1b as a novel target in controlling the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2020; 76, pp. 2233-2242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5761] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976620]

73. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, S.; Zuo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y. Functional validation of cadherin as a receptor of Bt toxin Cry1Ac in Helicoverpa armigera utilizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 76, pp. 11-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.06.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27343383]

74. Chang, H.; Liu, Y.; Ai, D.; Jiang, X.; Dong, S.; Wang, G. A pheromone antagonist regulates optimal mating time in the moth Helicoverpa armigera. Curr. Biol.; 2017; 27, pp. 1610-1615. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.035] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528905]

75. Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Liu, L.; Tay, W.T.; Walsh, T.K.; Wu, Y. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing of Helicoverpa armigera with mutations of an ABC transporter gene HaABCA2 confers resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2A toxins. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2017; 87, pp. 147-153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.07.002]

76. Khan, S.A.; Reichelt, M.; Heckel, D.G. Functional analysis of the ABCs of eye color in Helicoverpa armigera with CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 40025. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40025]

77. Wang, H.; Shi, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Wu, S.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y. CYP6AE gene cluster knockout in Helicoverpa armigera reveals role in detoxification of phytochemicals and insecticides. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 4820. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07226-6]

78. Van Leeuwen, T.; Demaeght, P.; Osborne, E.J.; Dermauw, W.; Gohlke, S.; Nauen, R.; Clark, R.M. Population bulk segregant mapping uncovers resistance mutations and the mode of action of a chitin synthesis inhibitor in arthropods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 4407-4412. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200068109]

79. Douris, V.; Steinbach, D.; Panteleri, R.; Livadaras, I.; Pickett, J.A.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Vontas, J. Resistance mutation conserved between insects and mites unravels the benzoylurea insecticide mode of action on chitin biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 14692-14697.

80. Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, B.; Wang, Y.; James, A.A.; Gurr, G.M.; You, M. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of the abdominal-A homeotic gene in the global pest, diamondback moth (Plutellaxylostella). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 75, pp. 98-106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.06.004]

81. Wu, K.; Shirk, P.D.; Taylor, C.E.; Furlong, R.B.; Shirk, B.D.; Pinheiro, D.H.; Siegfried, B.D. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of the abdominal-A homeotic gene in fall armyworm moth (Spodoptera frugiperda). PLoS ONE; 2018; 13, e0208647. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208647]

82. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xu, J.; Li, X.; Bi, H.; Andongma, A.A.; Huang, Y. Mutation of doublesex induces sex-specific sterility of the diamondback moth Plutellaxylostella. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2019; 112, 103180. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103180]

83. Bi, H.L.; Xu, J.; Tan, A.J.; Huang, Y.P. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted gene mutagenesis in Spodoptera litura. Insect Sci.; 2016; 23, pp. 469-477. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12341]

84. Zhu, G.H.; Peng, Y.C.; Zheng, M.Y.; Zhang, X.Q.; Sun, J.B.; Huang, Y.; Dong, S.L. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated BLOS2 knockout resulting in disappearance of yellow strips and white spots on the larval integument in Spodoptera litura. J. Insect Physiol.; 2017; 103, pp. 29-35. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.09.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927827]

85. Vogt, R.G.; Riddiford, L.M. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature; 1981; 293, pp. 161-163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/293161a0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18074618]

86. Zhu, G.H.; Xu, J.; Cui, Z.; Dong, X.T.; Ye, Z.F.; Niu, D.J.; Dong, S.L. Functional characterization of SlitPBP3 in Spodoptera litura by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 75, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.05.006]

87. Koutroumpa, F.A.; Monsempes, C.; François, M.C.; De Cian, A.; Royer, C.; Concordet, J.P.; Jacquin-Joly, E. Heritable genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 induces anosmia in a crop pest moth. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 29620. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29620] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403935]

88. Zuo, Y.; Xue, Y.; Lu, W.; Ma, H.; Chen, M.; Wu, Y.; Hu, Z. Functional validation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α6 as a target of spinosyns in Spodoptera exiguautilizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2020; 76, pp. 2415-2422. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5782]

89. Liu, H.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Genome editing of Wnt-1, a gene associated with segmentation, via CRISPR/Cas9 in the pine caterpillar moth, Dendrolimus punctatus Front. Physiol.; 2017; 7, 666. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00666] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111552]

90. Garczynski, S.F.; Martin, J.A.; Griset, M.; Willett, L.S.; Cooper, W.R.; Swisher, K.D.; Unruh, T.R. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) CpomOR1 gene affects egg production and viability. J. Econ. Entomol.; 2017; 110, pp. 1847-1855. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox166] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28854653]

91. You, L.; Bi, H.L.; Wang, Y.H.; Li, X.W.; Chen, X.E.; Li, Z.Q. CRISPR/Cas9-based mutation reveals Argonaute 1 is essential for pigmentation in Ostriniafurnacalis. Insect Sci.; 2019; 26, pp. 1020-1028. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12628]

92. Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Chen, X.E.; Tian, D.; Xu, X.; Li, K.; He, L. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Tyrosine hydroxylase knockout resulting in larval lethality in Agrotisipsilon. Insect Sci.; 2018; 25, pp. 1017-1024. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12647]

93. Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Liu, H.; Bi, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, H. Mutation of doublesex in Hyphantria cunea results in sex-specific sterility. Pest Manag. Sci.; 2020; 76, pp. 1673-1682. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.5687] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749278]

94. Tang, R.; Li, S.; Liang, J.; Yi, H.; Jing, X.; Liu, T.X. Optimization of the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Mythimna separata. Entomol. Exp. Appl.; 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eea.13184]

95. Xue, W.H.; Xu, N.; Yuan, X.B.; Chen, H.H.; Zhang, J.L.; Fu, S.J.; Xu, H.J. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of two eye pigmentation genes in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvatalugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2018; 93, pp. 19-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.12.003]

96. Hunter, W.B.; Gonzalez, M.T.; Tomich, J. BAPC-assisted CRISPR/Cas9 System: Targeted Delivery into Adult Ovaries for Heritable Germline Gene Editing (Arthropoda: Hemiptera). BioRxiv; 2018; 478743. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/478743]

97. Hunter, W.B.; Gonzalez, M.T.; Tomich, J. BAPC-assisted-CRISPR-Cas9 Delivery into Nymphs and Adults for Heritable Gene Editing (Hemiptera). FASEB J.; 2019; 33, (Suppl. 1), 626.2. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.626.2]

98. Heu, C.C.; McCullough, F.M.; Luan, J.; Rasgon, J.L. CRISPR-Cas9-Based Genome Editing in the Silverleaf Whitefly (Bemisiatabaci). CRISPR J.; 2020; 3, pp. 89-96. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2019.0067]

99. Cagliari, D.; Smagghe, G.; Zotti, M.; Taning, C.N.T. RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 as Functional Genomics Tools in the Neotropical Stink Bug, Euschistusheros. Insects; 2020; 11, 838. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11120838]

100. Richards, S.; Gibbs, R.A.; Weinstock, G.M.; Brown, S.J.; Denell, R.; Beeman, R.W.; Sattelle, D.B. The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum. Nature; 2008; 452, pp. 949-955.

101. Kim, K.H.; Jeong, J.Y.; Surh, Y.J.; Kim, K.W. Expression of stress-response ATF3 is mediated by Nrf2 in astrocytes. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2010; 38, pp. 48-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp865]

102. Pavlopoulos, A.; Berghammer, A.J.; Averof, M.; Klingler, M. Efficient transformation of the beetle Triboliumcastaneum using the Minos transposable element: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of genomic integration events. Genetic; 2004; 167, pp. 737-746. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.103.023085] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15238525]

103. Gilles, A.F.; Schinko, J.B.; Averof, M. Efficient CRISPR-mediated gene targeting and transgene replacement in the beetle Triboliumcastaneum. Development; 2015; 142, pp. 2832-2839.

104. Berghammer, A.J.; Weber, M.; Trauner, J.; Klingler, M. Red flour beetle (Tribolium) germline transformation and insertional mutagenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2009; 2009, pdb-prot5259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5259] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20147235]

105. Gui, S.; Taning, C.N.T.; Wei, D.; Smagghe, G. First report on CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. J. Insect Physiol.; 2020; 121, 104013. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104013] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917244]

106. He, J.; Chen, Q.; Wei, Y.; Jiang, F.; Yang, M.; Hao, S.; Kang, L. MicroRNA-276 promotes egg-hatching synchrony by up-regulating brm in locusts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 584-589. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521098113] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26729868]

107. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D.; Yang, P.; Jiang, F.; Wang, X.; Kang, L. CRISPR/Cas9 in locusts: Successful establishment of an olfactory deficiency line by targeting the mutagenesis of an odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2016; 79, pp. 27-35.

108. Bajda, S.; Dermauw, W.; Panteleri, R.; Sugimoto, N.; Douris, V.; Tirry, L. A mutation in the PSST homologue of complex I (NADH: Ubiquinone oxidoreductase) from Tetranychusurticae is associated with resistance to METI acaricides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2017; 80, pp. 79-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.11.010]

109. Dermauw, W.; Jonckheere, W.; Riga, M.; Livadaras, I.; Vontas, J.; Van Leeuwen, T. Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR-Cas9 in the chelicerate herbivore Tetranychusurticae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Bio.; 2020; 120, 103347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103347]

110. Ren, X.; Yang, Z.; Xu, J.; Sun, J.; Mao, D.; Hu, Y.; Yang, S.J.; Qiao, H.H.; Wang, X.; Hu, Q. et al. Enhanced specificity and efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system with optimized sgRNA parameters in Drosophila. Cell. Rep.; 2014; 9, pp. 1151-1162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.044]

111. Port, F.; Bullock, S.L. Augmenting CRISPR applications in Drosophila with tRNA-flanked sgRNAs. Nat. Methods; 2016; 13, pp. 852-854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3972]

112. Mabashi-Asazuma, H.; Sohn, B.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Kuo, C.W.; Khoo, K.H.; Kucharski, C.A.; Jarvis, D.L. Targeted glycoengineering extends the protein N-glycosylation pathway in the silkworm silk gland. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2015; 65, pp. 20-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.07.004]

113. Gao, J.L.; Fan, Y.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Pu, J.; Li, L.; Xu, Y.Z. A conserved intronic U1 snRNP-binding sequence promotes trans-splicing in Drosophila. Genes Dev.; 2015; 29, pp. 760-771. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.258863.115] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25838544]

114. Kunzelmann, S.; Böttcher, R.; Schmidts, I.; Förstemann, K. A comprehensive toolbox for genome editing in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells. G3; 2016; 6, pp. 1777-1785. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.028241]

115. Tanaka, R.; Murakami, H.; Ote, M.; Yamamoto, D. Clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-mediated mutagenesis and phenotype rescue by piggyBac transgenesis in a nonmodel Drosophila species. Insect Mol. Biol.; 2016; 25, pp. 355-361. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imb.12232]

116. Chen, E.H.; Hou, Q.L. Identification and expression analysis of cuticular protein genes in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.; 2021; 178, 104943. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104943] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446209]

117. Zhu, G.H.; Chereddy, S.C.; Howell, J.L.; Palli, S.R. Genome editing in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda: Multiple sgRNA/Cas9 method for identification of knockouts in one generation. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.; 2020; 122, 103373. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103373] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32276113]