The Gut Microbiome and Female Health

Abstract

Simple Summary

A plethora of studies have highlighted the profound role of the gut microbiome in human health. However, there is a lack of studies on female health. Given that females may be more likely to be affected by some ailments such as osteoarthritis, heart disease, cancer, and anxiety, it is imperative to study the effect of the gut microbiome and its role in female health. It is evident that the presence/ratio of microbial species is altered in polycystic ovarian syndrome, cancer, pregnancy, and menopause. Thus, potential probiotics should be developed and the administration of certain bacterial species should be considered, as novel independent or adjunct therapies for various female-related pathologies. Strategies such as the modulation of the gut microbiome via diet and through supplementation with pre/pro/postbiotics in various female health-related issues should be undertaken.

Abstract

The possession of two X chromosomes may come with the risk of various illnesses, females are more likely to be affected by osteoarthritis, heart disease, and anxiety. Given the reported correlations between gut microbiome dysbiosis and various illnesses, the female gut microbiome is worthy of exploration. Herein, we discuss the composition of the female gut microbiota and its dysbiosis in pathologies affecting the female population. Using PubMed, we performed a literature search, using key terms, namely: “gut microbiome”, “estrogen”, “menopause”, “polycystic ovarian syndrome”, “pregnancy”, and “menstruation”. In polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), the abundance of Bacteroides vulgatus, Firmicutes, Streptococcus, and the ratio of Escherichia/Shigella was found to be increased while that of Tenericutes ML615J-28, Tenericutes 124-7, Akkermansia, Ruminococcaceae, and Bacteroidetes S24-7 was reduced. In breast cancer, the abundance of Clostridiales was enhanced, while in cervical cancer, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Dialister were enhanced but Bacteroides, Alistipes, and members of Lachnospiracea, were decreased. In ovarian cancer, Prevotella abundance was increased. Interestingly, the administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus fermentum ameliorated PCOS symptoms while that of a mix of Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Lactobacillus brevis W63, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Lactococcus lactis W19, Lactobacillus casei W56, and Lactococcus lactis W58 alleviated vascular malfunction and arterial stiffness in obese postmenopausal women, and finally, while further research is needed, Prevotella maybe protective against postmenopausal bone mass loss. As several studies report the therapeutic potential of probiotics and since the gut microbiota of certain female pathological states has been relatively characterized, we speculate that the administration of certain bacterial species as probiotics is warranted, as novel independent or adjunct therapies for various female pathologies.

1. Introduction

An increasing body of research highlights the importance of gender differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of various diseases, especially non-communicable diseases [1]. Furthermore, females are at a greater risk of suffering from osteoarthritis, heart disease, urinary tract problems, stroke, depression, and anxiety [2]. However, although females comprise almost half of the human population, there is a reported discrepancy in the presentation of the genders in health studies [3]. Moreover, women are underrepresented, and their physical complaints are trivialized [4,5]. Hence, many organizations call upon the inclusion of gender as a dimension in clinical trials [1]. Aside from obvious physical differences, the two genders are reported to have compositional differences in their gut microbiome [6]. Namely, a study employing 348 male and 341 female mice from 89 matched strains reported marked abundance differences among several taxa between the sexes, and a larger number of differences were observed at the single strain level [7]. A bidirectional relationship is established between host hormones and the host’s gut microbiome. Moreover, sex hormones can affect bacterial growth and virulence. Namely, the sex hormones estriol and estradiol inhibit bacterial virulence through hindering quorum sensing while progesterone was shown to enhance the growth of oral Bacteroides species and Prevotella intermedius [8]. Interestingly, some studies also imply that commensal microbiota can influence and modulate sex hormone levels [7]. While we still cannot define what a healthy gut microbiome is, gut microbial dysbiosis has been correlated with various diseases ranging from irritable bowel syndrome to cancer [9,10,11,12]. In light of the reported associations between the gut microbiome and overall human health, coupled with the disproportionately higher risk females are under for various diseases, the female gut microbiome is a topic worthy of investigation. Using PubMed as a database, we searched the literature using key terms, namely “gut microbiome”, “estrogen”, “menopause”, “polycystic ovarian syndrome”, “pregnancy”, and “menstruation” and a time interval ranging from 2012 to 2022 with a focus on recent studies. Herein, we review and describe the composition of the healthy female gut microbiome, the potential role of the gut microbiota and its dysbiosis in female diseases such as polycystic ovaries syndrome (PCOS) and female cancers, and otherwise, normal female physiology, namely, pregnancy, menstruation, and menopause, and finally the importance of the gut microbiota in postmenopausal health and postmenopausal illnesses.

2. Gut Microbiome in Healthy Females

Gender-dependent differences in the gut microbiome have been reported [9]. Women’s gut microbiome composition markedly differs from men’s [13,14]. As depicted in Figure 1, women are reported to have a lower Bacteroides abundance but higher α diversity, a measure of diversity within an individual sample [13,14,15]. Female sex hormone levels affect the microbiota composition [16]. However, this influence is bidirectional. This is because the microbiome regulates steroid hormone levels including estrogens [17]. In a clinical trial employing 25 men, 7 postmenopausal women, and 19 premenopausal women, results imply that the intestinal microbiome indeed affects systemic estrogen levels [18]. Another study reports that gut microbial diversity is positively correlated with estrogen metabolites to parent estrogen ratio in a group of postmenopausal women [17]. However, further studies with a larger and more inclusive population should be carried out to investigate this linkage in women before menopause. Certain enteric bacteria, whose genome is called the estrobolome, metabolize estrogens [17,19]. To be excreted, estrogens are hepatically conjugated through glucuronidation or sulfonation [19]. These estrobolome bacterial species with their ß-glucuronidase activity can deconjugate excreted estrogens in the bile and prevent their excretion [17,19]. This may explain why fecal glucuronidase levels were reported to be inversely associated with gut estrogen levels [18]. The human gut also carries out various local and distant functions through hormonal metabolites and intermediates [19]. Remarkably, gut microbes also carry out the synthesis of estrogen-like compounds from nutrition [17]. In healthy females, probiotic administration has shown promise. While probiotic administration fails to engender persistent gut microbiota changes, it has been reported to improve vaginal lactobacilli concentration, female health system bowel movement, and immune system responses in healthy adults [20]. Moreover, probiotics help enhance local vaginal immunity and maintain female reproductive tract health [21]. Notably, certain bacterial strains, namely, Lactobacillus strains have been shown to prevent the recurrence of urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis [22,23].

3. Gut Microbiome and PCOS

PCOS affects 8–13% of women worldwide in their reproductive age [24]. While the clinical phenotype may vary, insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism are the hallmarks of PCOS [25]. The gut microbiome of PCOS sufferers differs from that of controls [26]. As can be seen in Table 1 and Figure 1, PCOS patients have a less diverse gut microbiome, which is correlated with hyperandrogenism [25,27,28]. In a clinical trial, 43 healthy females and 50 PCOS patients were employed, taking into consideration the influence of body weight [26]. While Alpha (α) diversity was comparable in both groups, Beta (β) diversity, a measure of diversity among different samples, was markedly decreased in the gut microbiota of PCOS patients [15,26]. Conversely, a study reports that α diversity is altered in PCOS patients’ guts [29]. Another study confirms the alteration by reporting a decrease in α diversity in the guts of women with PCOS [30]. Notably, the abundance of a Bacteroides species responsible for the deconjugation of conjugated bile acids synthesized in the liver, Bacteroides vulgatus (B. vulgatus), was significantly higher in women with PCOS than in the controls [26]. Firmicutes, a phylum correlated with obesity, is also more abundant in PCOS patients while Tenericutes ML615J-28, Tenericutes 124-7, and Bacteroidetes S24-7 levels are reduced [25,27,28]. An increase in streptococcus and the ratio of Escherichia/Shigella was also reported in the gut of women with PCOS [25]. Opposingly, it was found that Akkermansia, a species reported to modulate energy metabolism and glucose tolerance in humans, and Ruminococcaceae, were less abundant in PCOS patients [25,31].

Some clinical trials imply a lack of association between the disruption of the estrous cycle and microbiome in PCOS [48]. However, studies have reported that the gut microbiome is involved in the clinical manifestation of PCOS [28,49,50]. Murine studies report that gut microbiome indeed alters female physiology. After oral–fecal transplantation from the gut microbiota of PCOS individuals, mice exhibited insulin resistance, disrupted estrous cycle, higher number of cyst-like follicles, fewer corpora lutea, and elevated testosterone and luteinizing hormone than the controls [26]. Remarkably, these mice produced fewer pups after the oral lavage [26]. In humans, it was reported that the serum insulin level in PCOS patients was markedly correlated with various intestinal bacteria including Collinsella [25]. A disordered gut microbiome is correlated with obesity and more than half of PCOS patients are obese [28]. Consequently, correlations between obesity associated with PCOS and the gut microbiome were described. In a recent clinical trial, [25] it was reported that the abundance of Tenericutes in obese PCOS patients and control obese individuals was comparable. However, β diversity differences have been reported in non-obese and obese PCOS patients, which were not observed between obese and non-obese control individuals [28]. Thus, gut microbiome disturbances may be a factor in obesity specifically associated with PCOS.

There are various mechanisms behind the gut microbes’ participation in the clinical course of PCOS. Bile acids endorse the digestion and absorption of fat-soluble substances [28]. However, bacteria are crucial to bile acid transformation [28]. The gut microbiome influences host metabolism through interactions with host signaling pathways [26,29]. For instance, changes in the microbiome of PCOS patients affect bile acid metabolism [26,29]. Specifically, levels of the bile acids: glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA) and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) were decreased in the stool and serum of PCOS patients [26]. Remarkably, the abundance of B. vulgatus was negatively correlated with that of GDCA and TUDCA [26]. Furthermore, B. vulgatus species in PCOS patients exhibited a higher abundance of bile salt hydrolase genes than controls [26]. Hence, the gut microbiome influences its host metabolism.

Through the decomposition of organic material, gut microbes produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and other metabolites to supply the host with energy [28]. SCFAs regulate glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation through activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) in the liver and muscles [28]. Notably, SCFAs bind to free fatty acid receptors FFAR-2 and FFAR-3 leading to the inhibition of appetite stimulating hormone [28]. This inhibition hinders the secretion and transformation of sex hormones, specifically the transformation of androgen to estrogen [28]. Secondly, gut microbes can affect insulin sensitivity through branched short amino acids (BCAA). An increase in BCAAs has been associated with the development of diabetes type 2 [24,28]. Gut bacteria from the genus provotella are BCAAs synthesizers [28]. Thus, an increase in these bacteria may lead to insulin resistance. In [25] it is reported that the gut microbiome of obese PCOS patients employed in their clinical trial harbored Paraprevotella and Alloprevotella.

Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are a cell wall constituent in Gram-negative bacteria such as Bacteroides [28]. After their absorbance to the blood, LPS can bind to Toll-like receptor 4 and activate signaling pathways that affect insulin sensitivity and, ultimately, lead to insulin resistance [28]. After being fermented by the gut microbiota to trimethylamine, the nutrient choline is hepatically metabolized to trimethylamine oxide (TMAO), an osmotic substance involved in regulating insulin resistance [28]. Thus, an increase in trimethylamine-producing bacteria leads to higher TMAO levels, which may aggravate PCOS [28]. Further work is warranted to elucidate the precise role of the gut microbiome in PCOS. Future studies should be carried out to develop therapies that modulate the gut microbiome in order to alleviate or prevent PCOS.

4. Gut Microbiome and Cancer

Disturbances in the gut microbiome have been associated with and observed in various cancers including gastric, colorectal, hepatic, pancreatic, and prostate cancer [51,52,53]. Interestingly, in pancreatic cancer and melanoma murine models, a significant decrease in subcutaneous tumor burden was observed after depleting the gut microbiome through antibiotic administration [51]. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is also observed in various cancers affecting the female population including breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer as depicted in Table 1 and Figure 1 [45,46,47]. Furthermore, some studies imply a decrease in the diversity of the gut microbiota and an increase in the abundance of Clostridiales in breast cancer patients [45]. An analysis of the gut microbiota of postmenopausal women with breast cancer reveals that while the differences in relative species abundance in gut microbiota between premenopausal breast cancer patients and premenopausal controls was negligible, 45 species differed significantly in their relative abundance between postmenopausal patients and postmenopausal controls [54]. Moreover, in postmenopausal cancer patients, 38 species were overrepresented such as Escherichia coli, Actinomyces sp. HPA0247, Klebsiella sp_1_1_55, Prevotella amnii, and Shewanella. A study revealed that α and β diversity differed significantly between employed cervical cancer patients and cancer-free women [47]. Additionally, the study disclosed that cervical cancer patients had higher levels of Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Dialister while cancer-free individuals had greater levels of Bacteroides, Alistipes, and members of the Lachnospiracea than controls [47]. In ovarian cancer patients, a shared increase in Prevotella regardless of platinum sensitivity was observed, but the study was unable to count for the potential effects of chemotherapy [46].

Aside from regulating the host’s immune system, the gut microbiome is involved in both oncogenesis and the suppression of malignant transformation [51,55]. Furthermore, bacterial metabolites produced by the gut microbiome also regulate cancer cell metabolism [45,56]. These secreted bacterial metabolites act like hormones since they can enter the circulation, reach far targets, and carry out important functions such as impacting mitochondrial metabolism and modulating the behavior of breast cancer cells, lithocholic acid (LCA), SCFAs, cadaverine, and deconjugated estrogens [45,56]. As mentioned in the previous section, the gut microbiome is an important player in estrogen metabolism. Since 80% of breast cancer cases are estrogen receptor-positive, the deconjugation of estrogens by the gut microbiome is of relevance [19,57,58,59,60,61]. Aside from being more abundant in the gut of breast cancer patients, Clostridiales reactivates estrogens and increases their serum levels [45]. Estrogen receptors play a direct role in the expression of nuclear-coded mitochondrial proteins [45]. An increase in oxidative phosphorylation promotes metastasis [45]. The gut microbiome also synthesizes estrogen-like compounds from dietary sources [17].

The gut microbiome generates the SCFAs: formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, and lactate, through the fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates and in minute amounts through amino acid degradation [45]. With receptors on cancer and stromal cells, SCFAs regulate various cancer hallmarks such as cell proliferation, gene expression, cell invasion, apoptosis, and metabolism in breast cancer [45]. SCFAs in general can serve as energy substrates for cancer cells [45]. Interestingly, sodium butyrate drives oxygen consumption in breast cancer cell lines and inhibits lactate metabolism, markedly decreasing breast cancer cell viability [45]. The anaerobic bacteria Clostridiales are mainly responsible for bile acid transformation [45]. At the serum level, the secondary bile acid LCA exhibits an antineoplastic effect on breast cancer cells, regulates oxidative phosphorylation, and inhibits proliferation [45]. Remarkably, the gut microbiota of breast cancer patients displayed a reduced ability to synthesize LCA [45]. Gut bacteria including Shigella flexneri, Shigella sonnei, Escherichia coli, and Streptococci carry out the biosynthesis of cadaverine from lysine [45]. Cadaverine is important because it hinders cell proliferation and tumor infiltration [45]. Interestingly, cadaverine was ineffective on primary untransformed cells and the microbiome’s capacity to synthesize cadaverine is decreased in breast cancer patients [45]. The link between the gut microbiota and gynecological cancers requires further study [62] However, just like breast cancer, ovarian cancer is correlated with estrogen abnormalities [62]. In cervical cancer patients, gut microbiota profiles and β diversity differed markedly from cancer-free women [63]. Namely, the Proteobacteria phylum was significantly more abundant in cervical cancer patients [63]. Thus, gut microbial modulation should be considered as a therapeutic option or at the very least an additional therapeutic strategy in tandem with traditional cancer therapies.

5. Gut Microbiome and Pregnancy

Aside from infant health, evidence indicates that maternal microbiome niches influence maternal well-being and post-partum recovery [64]. Furthermore, gut microbiome disturbances have been linked with the clinical characteristics of preeclampsia, a pregnancy complication characterized by high blood pressure, and some even hypothesize that there is a link between the maternal gut microbiome and postpartum depression [64,65]. In fact, a Chinese herbal medicine has been shown to ameliorate postpartum depression through modulating the gut microbiota [66]. A study also indicates that the maternal gut microbiome may play a part in the immunological adaptations accompanying pregnancy, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 [67]. Interestingly, an investigation of gut microbiota changes in patients with positive immune antibody-associated recurrent miscarriage reveals that some highly abundant genera, such as Blautia and Bacteroides, may be incriminated in recurrent miscarriage [37]. Bidirectional interactions between the gut microbiome and pregnancy have been reported. For instance, bacterial growth can be influenced by hormonal changes [68,69]. Moreover, gut microbial changes during pregnancy are mediated by hormonal changes accompanying gestation [33,34]. Namely, it has been reported that fecal progesterone levels were negatively correlated with diversity during pregnancy [34]. Notably, profound alterations in the microbial profile of the gut microbiome have been observed during the progression of pregnancy such as an increase in Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and opportunistic pathogens, and a decrease in SCFA producers and in overall species richness [35,36].

In humans, an analysis of the gut microbiome of thirty-five women in their first and third trimesters of pregnancy reveals that Bifidobacterium, Blautia, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroides, unclassified Lachnospiraceae, unclassified Clostridiales, Akkermansia, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, and Prevotella were the generally dominant bacterial species. Interestingly, Bifidobacterium is crucial for human milk oligosaccharide degradation and Prevotella metabolizes estradiol and progesterone [36]. Differences were also observed between the two semesters. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium, Neisseria, Blautia, and Collinsella increased most significantly in the third semester while Dehalobacterium, Clostridium, and Bacteroidales were markedly higher in the first [36]. Another report disclosed that maternal microbiome biodiversity changes with the progression of pregnancy and is associated with gestational weight gain [70]. While studies imply that gut microbiota changes dramatically such as an increase in lactic acid-producing bacteria coupled with a decrease in butyrate-producing bacteria, a recent analysis conducted on Japanese women during early and late pregnancy negates differences between late and early pregnancy microbial composition and reveals that the recruited women did not show notable differences in gut microbiota related to pregnancy, except for the phylum TM7, which decreased in late pregnancy [71,72]. Similarly, another study confirms a lack of difference and mentions that the study carried out by [35], which reported significant changes associated with pregnancy, recruited women who were consuming probiotic supplementation [73]. Interestingly, studies imply that pregnancy-induced changes in the female gut microbiome occurring at the onset of pregnancy may be vulnerable to modulation by diet while being independent of maternal weight gain and even the number of successive pregnancies [74,75]. Thus, in late pregnancy, the microbiota readjusts carbohydrate-related functions expression in consistency with the high glucose availability [76]. Notably, the microbiome of pregnant women can also bring about metabolic alterations in germ-free hosts. Furthermore, a study disclosed that fecal transplantation from pregnant women to germ-free mice induced greater adiposity and insulin insensitivity [35]. Given the plethora of studies indicative of the effect of the gut microbiome in pregnancy, further work is warranted to comprehend a more detailed mechanistic understanding as well as work to develop pre/pro/postbiotics for pregnant women.

Similarly, animal studies reported changes in gut microbiota accompanying pregnancy. In pigs, different stages of pregnancy brought about distinct changes in the abundance of Tenericutes, Fibrobacteres, and Cyanobacteria [33]. Overall, the α diversity values of the gut microbiota and the abundance of Clostridiales, Desulfovibrio, Mogibacteriaceae, and Prevotella increased over the course of pregnancy only to decrease at weaning [33]. The progression of pregnancy markedly affected the beta diversity of the gut microbiota and modified the abundance of multiple carbohydrate-degradation bacteria: Bacteroides, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Succinivibrio [33]. Another study conducted on sows reveals changes in the gut microbiota across the perinatal period with variance in microbial function and abundance between the prenatal and postnatal periods where the alpha diversity was higher in the latter [77]. Furthermore, Akkermansia, Desulfovibrio, Methanobrevibacter, and Turicibacter were enriched in the prenatal period while Actinobacillus, Acidaminococcus, Megasphaera, Eubacterium, Butyricimonas, Paludibacter, Rummeliibacillus, and Succiniclasticum were enriched in the postnatal period. The changes in gut microbiota accompanying cow parturition were investigated through 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing, revealing notable changes in the gut microbiome throughout the late pregnancy to the postpartum stage [78]. During late pregnancy, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Clostridium were enriched while Bacteroides, Escherichia, and Campylobacter were more abundant at postpartum [78]. Similarly, a study reports substantial remodeling of sow gut microbiota during the late stages of pregnancy to the postpartum stage [69]. Furthermore, the gut bacterial richness of both pregnant and delivery sows decreased markedly while the β-diversity notably expanded [69]. The relative abundance of Lactobacillus notably increased from the late pregnancy to the postpartum stage while the Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes ratio and the relative Prevotella abundance decreased [69]. An investigation of gut microbiota composition alterations across different reproductive periods of Tibetan macaques wild females revealed nonnegligible deviations in taxonomic structure, composition, and potential functions of gut microbes [79]. The study revealed an increase in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria during pregnancy and lactation, and an overrepresentation of the relative abundance of Succinivibrionaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae in pregnant and lactating females, respectively [79].

6. Changes in Gut Microbiome during the Menstrual Cycle

The menstrual cycle extends 28 ±  4 days and is comprised of the follicular, luteal, and menstrual phases [80,81]. The menstrual cycle is accompanied by significant hormonal fluctuations. Moreover, the level of the steroid hormone estrogen soars in the middle of the follicular phase, drops after ovulation, and rises back again in the early luteal phase [80]. The early luteal phase is also characterized by an increase in the progesterone level [81]. The sudden drop in these two hormones in the late luteal phase brings about menses [81]. Many healthy females report variations in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms during their menstrual cycle, which may be deduced to the presence of sex hormone receptors along the GI tract [81]. For instance, a study investigating the relationship between menstrual cycle phase, daily stool number, and consistency reveals looser stool consistency in the early menstrual period in comparison to midcycle in six out of the seven employed participants [82]. However, studies investigating GI transit throughout the menstrual cycle produce contradicting results. Furthermore, some disclose an increase in transit time during the luteal phase, accompanying the increased progesterone levels while others negate any change [13,83,84].

Hormonal fluctuations may impose pressures on the function and composition of the human microbiome [85]. Namely, the gut microbiome is reported to be influenced by estrogen [86]. Furthermore, estrogen levels are associated with gut microbiome alpha diversity and fecal Clostrdia taxa [13]. Given the influence estrogen has on the gut microbiome, the potential link between the GI disturbances and menstruation may potentially be mediated by the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota is also reported to be affected by the steroid hormone progesterone. A study reports the amelioration of depression and anxiety-like behaviors accompanying the premenstrual, post-partum, and premenopausal periods by progesterone in mice [84]. However, that effect was undermined by antibiotic treatment, indicating that this improvement is mediated through progesterone’s enhancing effect on Lactobacillus reuteri growth [84].

The influence between sex hormones and the gut microbiome is bidirectional. Moreover, bacteria can metabolize sex hormones through various enzymes such as hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, regulating the balance between active and inactive steroids [80]. Namely, fecal bacteria carry out hydrolytic reductive and oxidative reactions of androgens and estrogen [80]. Furthermore, the gut microbiome markedly influences estrogen levels [86]. This is through the gut microbiome’s secretion of β-glucuronidase, which is the enzyme responsible for estrogen deconjugation [86]. A decrease in the gut microbiome diversity affects β-glucuronidase activity adversely, lowering estrogen levels [13]. Since estrogen is only biologically active if deconjugated, this deconjugation enables estrogen to bind to its receptors: estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) [86,87]. Estrogen is crucial for homeostasis in healthy premenopausal women and its decrease accompanying menopause drives metabolic rate reduction and weight gain, yet it also stimulates epithelial proliferation within the female reproductive tract, driving various proliferative diseases such as uterine fibroids and endometriosis [86,87]. This engendered the hypothesis that the gut microbiome of endometriosis patients may have higher densities of β-glucuronidase producing bacteria than the controls [86]. In fact, a study reported that gut microbiota alterations were observed in the rhesus monkey model of endometriosis, namely, fewer Lactobacilli shedding in feces [88]. Interestingly, cyclic alterations in the gut microbiome may be linked with premenstrual syndrome, but this hypothesis is still under study and future work needs to be accomplished [89]. Thus, while research is required to confirm this speculation, we hypothesize that alterations in the gut microbiome may potentially bring about menstruation-related diseases.

There is a scarcity of studies investigating the relationship between the hormonal fluctuations accompanying the menstrual cycle and the gut microbiota [32]. However, studies investigating the relationship between menstruation and other human microbiomes have been performed. A study reports a lack of significant menstruation-driven changes in the saliva and fecal microbiomes, yet discloses an increased diversity in the vaginal microbiome during menses, which is ensured by an expansion of Lactobacillus during the follicular and luteal phases [90]. Similarly, another recent study reports increased vaginal microbial diversity and a correlation between Lactobacillus abundances and predicted estradiol levels across the menstrual cycle [91]. Analyses of the oral microbiome were also carried out. Interestingly, anaerobic bacterial counts in saliva are reported to increase during ovulation [85]. An analysis of the salivary profile of 309 women in their reproductive age during the menstrual, follicular, and luteal phases of the cycle reports a lack of significant differences in α-diversity or phase-specific clustering of the overall microbiome but discloses variance in the abundances of Prevotella, Campylobacter, Haemophilus, and Oribacterium throughout the cycle, where a higher species-richness was noted in the luteal phase [85].

7. Gut Microbiota Composition Alterations Accompanying Menopause

Female sex hormones such as estrogen impact microbiota in various body sites, especially the gut [16]. When women possess sufficient estrogen, their gut microbiota displays species diversity where beneficial bacteria are dominant and harmful bacteria growth is inhibited [38]. The gut microbiome has been correlated with menopause: the cessation of menstruation accompanied by estrogen down-regulation, ovary function loss, and hormone receptors dysfunction [16,38]. Menopause is associated with a lower gut microbial species diversity [92]. Thus, there are marked differences in the gut microbiomes and their metabolites in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 [93]. Changes in the gut microbiome have been reported in the perimenopausal period, the period before menopause occurs. Namely, during the perimenopausal period, the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria is markedly reduced while that of harmful bacteria such as Enterobacter is increased in women [38]. In a study, bilateral ovariectomizing was employed to investigate gut microbiota changes accompanying perimenopause and it revealed that ovariectomized mice displayed the lowest abundances, which was regulated by estrogen supplementation, implying a bidirectional relationship between the microbiota and estrogen [38]. Moreover, the study discloses that obesity in peri- and post-menopausal women is associated with possessing a gut microbiota unable to metabolize the soy isoflavone daidzein to O-desmethylangolensin [94].

Of note, the gut microbiota of post-menopausal women was observed to be closer in resemblance to men than that of pre-menopausal women [39]. Namely, postmenopausal women, similar to age-matched men, have a lower abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria [39]. Furthermore, the number of species from genera that differentiate men from women decreased after menopause implying a masculinization of the gut microbiota composition postmenopause [39]. Studies report that premenopausal women have higher abundances of several Alistipes, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus species and lower abundances of Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Haemophilus species, while postmenopausal women have fewer Firmicutes and Roseburia spp., and more Bacteroidetes and Tolumonasare in their fecal samples [39,93]. Furthermore, the ratio of Firmzicutes/Bacteroides, and the relative abundances of Lachnospira and Roseburia, are elevated in the gut microbiota of postmenopausal women, while the relative abundances of Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Bilophila are reduced [38]. Another study reported a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and relative abundance of Lachnospira and Roseburia, but a lower relative abundance of the Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Bilophila genera in pre-menopausal women than in post-menopausal women [40]. However, aside from β diversity, no differences of significance were reported in alpha diversity indices among pre- and post-menopausal women [39]. With its secretion of β-glucuronidase, the enzyme responsible for estrogen’s deconjugation into its active forms, the gut microbiome can affect the circulating levels of estrogens [86]. Moreover, dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, leading to lower microbial diversity, may decrease circulating estrogen as its deconjugation would be reduced [86]. Interestingly, the administration of a novel strain (YT2) of Lactobacillus intestinalis was found to be significantly reduced in ovariectomized rats, which led to a marked amelioration of menopausal symptoms such as increased fat mass, decreased bone mineral density, and remarkably, it also restored the intestinal microbial composition and increased Firmicutes/Bacteroides ratio [95]. Nonetheless, studies to determine the efficacy of these therapies in clinical trials are needed.

8. The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Postmenopausal Female Health

The gut microbiome has been correlated with various diseases accompanying menopause. Obesity affects 65% of postmenopausal women and interestingly, the relationship between the gut microbiota and estrogen is speculated to mediate this weight gain [16]. Moreover, the gut microbiome has been related to obesity, and menopause is associated with a heightened risk of obesity [92,93]. Notably, other than the differences in Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium animalis, Dorea, and Desulfovibrio, the gut microbial characteristics of diet-induced and bilaterally ovariectomized obese mice are reportedly similar [38]. However, a study reports that while menopausal obesity and dietary obesity led to similar gut microbiome structures, menopausal obesity engenders a different intestinal microbiota, namely, Bifidobacterium animalis, which was solely observed in the ovariectomized mice [96].

Notably, the gut microbiome was reported to impact skeletal muscle mass through its synthesis of SCFA butyrate in healthy menopausal women [97]. Moreover, increased capacity for gut microbial synthesis was markedly associated with serum butyrate levels and skeletal muscle index, and two main butyrate-producing bacterial species, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Butyricimonas virosa, were positively associated with this increased capacity for gut microbial synthesis of butyrate and the skeletal muscle index [97]. Gut ecology was also reported to contribute to the mediation of the protective effects increased aerobic capacity may have against menopause-associated cardiometabolic risk, especially the production of signaling molecules such as short-chain fatty acids produced by the gut [98]. Moreover, another study reports that the response to physical exercise, which is reported to modify the intestinal microbiota composition, is actually contingent upon the initial microbiota profile [92].

Postmenopausal women with breast cancer have been reported to possess an altered composition and estrogen-independent low diversity of their microbiota [16,54]. An analysis reports that postmenopausal women recently diagnosed with breast cancer had a less diverse fecal microbiota with a composition that differs from that of postmenopausal women without breast cancer and higher urinary estrogens [99]. This was confirmed by another study reporting the potentially decreased postmenopausal breast cancer risk for women who possess high intestinal microbial diversity [100]. Additionally, the abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria was reduced in healthy premenopausal women while Pediococcus and Desulfovibrio were relatively characteristic of premenopausal breast cancer patients [101]. Thirty-eight species were increased in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, namely, Shewanella putrefaciens, Enterococcus gallinarum, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp_1_1_55, Prevotella amnii, Actinomyces sp. HPA0247, and Erwinia amylovora, while seven species were underrepresented such as Eubacterium eligens and Lactobacillus vaginalis [54].

The risk of Alzheimer’s disease is also reported to increase during the menopausal transition [96]. Interestingly, postmenopausal women make up over 60% of all Alzheimer’s patients [102]. The pathophysiology of AD commences 10–20 years before symptoms can be detected clinically, corresponding with the hormonal transitions accompanying the menopausal transition, in which many of the symptoms are risk factors themselves for AD [102]. In fact, a nonnegligible body of data reported the neuroprotective effects of estrogen and its modulatory role in female cognitive aging [102]. Thus, the prevalent complaints of cognitive decline by menopausal women are plausible given that many regions vulnerable to AD display significant overlap with the brain estrogen network [102]. As explained previously, the gut microbiota, through its deconjugation of estrogens in the bile, plays a role in determining systemic estrogen levels [17,19]. Hence, since the cognitive decline accompanying AD is largely correlated with that of estrogen, we can speculate that the gut microbiome may mediate or contribute to the deflation in estrogen systemic levels in menopausal women. Notably, studies utilizing a murine model disclose that gut dysbiosis may be a risk factor for AD [103,104]. Moreover, using an AD-like pathology with amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles (ADLP^APT) transgenic mouse model of AD, a study reports differences in the gut microbiota composition of healthy wild-type mice and that of ADLP^APT [103]. Additionally, ADLP^APT mice displayed a loss of epithelial barrier integrity and chronic intestinal and systemic inflammation [103]. Notably, transplantation of the fecal microbiota from wild-type mice into ADLP^APT mice ameliorated the formation of neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid β plaques, glial reactivity, and cognitive impairment [103].

9. The Role of the Gut Microbiome and Postmenopausal Bone Health

Among postmenopausal women, osteoporosis and its precursor osteopenia are prevalent metabolic bone diseases [41]. The gut microbiome has also been implicated in bone-related diseases among postmenopausal women and their manifestations, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Moreover, an increase in gut permeability, which is associated with lower bone mineral density, has been reported during perimenopause [105]. A study reports decreased bacterial richness and diversity, and significant differences in abundance levels among phyla and genera in the gut microbial community in postmenopausal osteoporosis [42]. However, the study negates any significant correlation between bacterial diversity and estrogen [42]. An analysis of fecal samples from postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and with normal bone mass reveals a marked discrepancy between the gut microbiota of both groups [43]. Namely, the proportion of the genus Prevotella was notably higher in postmenopausal women with normal bone mass, implying a potential bone-protective effect of Prevotella [43]. Moreover, fracture incidence was markedly higher in postmenopausal women with low Bacteroides abundance than in controls [44]. Conversely, a recent study reports that Bacteroides were more prevalent in osteoporosis and osteopenia groups [41]. That study also reveals significant taxonomic compositional differences in osteoporotic and osteopenic, and healthy postmenopausal women, such as a higher abundance of unclassified Clostridia and methanogenic archaea, than in healthy postmenopausal women [41]. Another study recognized taxa-specific variations in the intestinal microbiota associated with bone turnover markers, especially C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) [106]. This could be elucidated by the hormonal changes characterizing menopause. Furthermore, the lack of female hormones brings about bone loss and osteoporosis [96]. Interestingly, probiotic administration was reported to ameliorate osteopenia in postmenopausal women. Moreover, the administration of probiotic treatment and bioavailable isoflavone attenuated bone mineral density loss brought about by estrogen deficiency, promoted a favorable estrogen metabolite profile, and improved bone turnover [107].

10. Therapeutic Strategies to Modulate the Gut Microbiome in Females

In light of reported gut microbial compositional changes accompanying various female diseases, investigating the therapeutic potential of probiotic administration or fecal transplant is suggested. Moreover, the female diseases we discussed were reported to be accompanied by gut dysbiosis. Hence, probiotic administration of certain bacterial species to correct a deficiency or an overgrowth may be of therapeutic value. Firstly, PCOS patients are reported to have a less diverse gut microbiome, specifically lower β diversity than controls [25,26,27,28]. Notably, the abundance of certain bacterial species was shown to be reduced while that of others was enhanced. Furthermore, the abundance of Bacteroides vulgatus (B. vulgatus), streptococcus, ratio of Escherichia/Shigella, and Firmicutes is higher, while that of Tenericutes ML615J-28, Tenericutes 124-7, Ruminococcaceae, Akkermansia, and Bacteroidetes S24-7 is lower in PCOS patients than the controls [25,27,28]. Hence, the administration of the latter species may ameliorate the condition. In fact, the administration of vitamin-D in conjugation with a probiotic supplement containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus fermentum for 12 weeks was shown to ameliorate some of PCOS symptoms [108]. Similarly, the administration of selenium with a probiotic supplement consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Bifidobacterium bifidum led to the same results [109]. Secondly, various cancers affecting the female population, such as breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer, were associated with gut microbiota alterations [45,46,47]. Namely, breast cancer patients were reported to display a heightened abundance of Clostridiales in breast cancer, cervical cancer patients had higher levels of Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Dialister and lower levels of Bacteroides, Alistipes, and members of Lachnospiracea, and ovarian cancer patients, displayed an increase in Prevotella [45,46,47]. Thus, a correction of these compositional deviations could be of relevance. For instance, several studies display promising evidence that diet, probiotics, and prebiotics could have an important therapeutic effect on breast cancer [110]. Thirdly, various diseases arising during the period and the transition to menopause are associated with gut alterations. Interestingly, Bifidobacterium animalis was observed in a murine model of menopausal obesity [96]. Hence, an investigation of the role of this bacterial species could be carried out and if found contributing to obesity, the introduction of a competing species could be a possibility. Markedly, an administration of a probiotic mix consisting of Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Lactobacillus brevis W63, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Lactococcus lactis W19, Lactobacillus casei W56, and Lactococcus lactis W58 was shown to positively affect vascular function and reduce arterial stiffness in obese postmenopausal Women [111]. Postmenopausal normal bone mass was associated with higher Prevotella abundance [43]. As mentioned previously, probiotic administration treatment and bioavailable isoflavone-attenuated bone mineral density loss are brought about by a deficiency in estrogen and improved bone turnover [107]. However, the administration of Prevotella may specifically prove protective against postmenopausal bone mass loss. Finally, studies utilizing murine models reveal that gut dysbiosis may be a risk factor for AD [103,104]. Interestingly, probiotic supplementation improved cognitive function and mood in adults above 65 years and had favorable outcomes on AD specifically [112,113].

11. Conclusions

Trillions of microorganisms populate the human GI tract and are known to protect the host from adversities. The gut microbiome has a profound role in the elimination of pathogens and may contribute to many diseases affecting females such as breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and postmenopausal period illnesses such as menopausal obesity, Alzheimer’s disease, and bone diseases (Table 1 and Figure 1). Traditionally most research has focused on male subjects and there is a need to undertake more research on female health. A recent study, the first of its kind examined the impact of menopause on women’s metabolism, as well as diet and how this related to their overall health [114]. The study indicated that diet and gut microbial species may have been responsible for changes observed after menopause such as higher blood pressure and a greater risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. The study indicated the important contribution of the gut microbiome and diet to female health. Future work should focus on developing therapy based on an individual’s metabolic and hormonal status as well as exploring the critical role of the microbiome. The modulation of the gut microbiome via diet and through supplementation with pre/pro/postbiotics in various female health issues should be undertaken. The precise optimal composition of microbial species is not known. Furthermore, modulation of the gut microbiome as a therapeutic/preventative strategy needs to be accomplished, with a focus on female health. Further studies are essential to ascertain the metabolites/molecules produced by the gut microbiota and their effects on female-related health issues are warranted.

Author Contributions

N.A.K. and R.S. envisioned the concept for the review. Z.M. and R.S. reviewed the literature and prepared the first draft of the manuscript together with A.M.A. and H.A. N.A.K. and R.S. corrected the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the American University of Sharjah and University of Sharjah to support this work. The work in this paper was supported, in part, by the Open Access Program from the American University of Sharjah. This paper represents the opinions of the author(s) and does not mean to represent the position or opinions of the American University of Sharjah.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest. The authors declare: (1) no financial support for the submitted work from anyone other than their employer; (2) no financial relationships with commercial entities that might have an interest in the submitted work; (3) no spouses, partners, or children with relationships with commercial entities that might have an interest in the submitted work; and (4) no non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figure and Table

Figure 1. The role of gut microbiome in female health.

Table 1

The impact of gut microbiota on female health.

Condition	Dysbiosis	Strains Increased	Strains Decreased	References
Menstruation	Little is known about the relationship between menstruation and the gut microbiome.			[32]
Pregnancy	Gut microbial changes mediated by gestational hormonal changes	Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and opportunistic pathogens	SCFA producers and in overall species richness	[33,34,35,36]
positive immune antibody-associated miscarriage	Unreported	Blautia and Bacteroides	None reported	[37]
Perimenopause	Present	Enterobacter	Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria	[38]
Postmenopause	Grows in resemblance to male gut microbiome	Conflicting results	Conflicting results	[38,39,40]
Postmenopause-associated bone diseases	decreased bacterial richness and diversity	unclassified Clostridia and methanogenic archaea	PrevotellaStudies report conflicting results on Bacteroides	[41,42,43,44]
PCOS	Present with decreased diversity	Bacteroides vulgatus, Firmicutes, Streptococcus, and the ratio of Escherichia/Shigella	Tenericutes ML615J-28, Tenericutes 124-7, Akkermansia, Ruminococcaceae, and Bacteroidetes S24-7	[25,26,27,28,30,31]
Breast cancer	Present with a decrease in diversity	Clostridiales	None reported	[45]
Ovarian cancer	Present	Prevotella, yet the effects of chemotherapy have not been accounted for.	None reported	[46]
Cervical cancer	Present with changes in diversity	Proteobacteria, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Dialister	Bacteroides, Alistipes, and members of the Lachnospiracea	[47]

References

1. Kautzky-Willer, A.; Harreiter, J.; Pacini, G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr. Rev.; 2016; 37, pp. 278-316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1137] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159875]

2. What Health Issues or Conditions Affect Women Differently Than Men?. Available online: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/womenshealth/conditioninfo/howconditionsaffect (accessed on 1 February 2022).

3. Friedson-Ridenour, S.; Dutcher, T.V.; Calderon, C.; Brown, L.D.; Olsen, C.W. Gender analysis for one health: Theoretical perspectives and recommendations for practice. Ecohealth; 2019; 16, pp. 306-316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-019-01410-w] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016438]

4. Vitale, C.; Fini, M.; Spoletini, I.; Lainscak, M.; Seferovic, P.; Rosano, G.M. Under-representation of elderly and women in clinical trials. Int. J. Cardiol.; 2017; 232, pp. 216-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.018] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111054]

5. Mirin, A.A. Gender disparity in the funding of diseases by the US National Institutes of Health. J. Women’s Health; 2021; 30, pp. 956-963. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8682] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33232627]

6. Thackray, V.G. Sex, Microbes, and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.; 2019; 30, pp. 54-65. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2018.11.001]

7. Org, E.; Mehrabian, M.; Parks, B.W.; Shipkova, P.; Liu, X.; Drake, T.A.; Lusis, A.J. Sex differences and hormonal effects on gut microbiota composition in mice. Gut Microbes.; 2016; 7, pp. 313-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2016.1203502]

8. Rizzetto, L.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Selmi, C. Connecting the immune system, systemic chronic inflammation and the gut microbiome: The role of sex. J. Autoimmun.; 2018; 92, pp. 12-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2018.05.008]

9. Siddiqui, R.; Mungroo, M.R.; Alharbi, A.M.; Alfahemi, H.; Khan, N.A. The Use of Gut Microbial Modulation Strategies as Interventional Strategies for Ageing. Microorganisms; 2022; 10, 1869. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091869]

10. Kim, S.K.; Guevarra, R.B.; Kim, Y.T.; Kwon, J.; Kim, H.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, H.B.; Lee, J.H. Role of probiotics in human gut microbiome-associated diseases. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2019; 29, pp. 1335-1340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1906.06064]

11. Shanahan, F.; Ghosh, T.S.; O’Toole, P.W. The healthy microbiome—What is the definition of a healthy gut microbiome?. Gastroenterology; 2021; 160, pp. 483-494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.057]

12. Song, P.; Wang, Q.B.; Liang, B.; Jiang, S.J. Advances in research on the relationship between the gut microbiome and cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.; 2021; 25, pp. 5104-5112. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202108_26521] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34486684]

13. Pugh, J.N.; Lydon, K.; O’Donovan, C.M.; O’Sullivan, O.; Madigan, S.M. More than a gut feeling: What is the role of the gastrointestinal tract in female athlete health?. Eur. J. Sport Sci.; 2022; 22, pp. 755-764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2021.1921853] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33944684]

14. Dominianni, C.; Sinha, R.; Goedert, J.J.; Pei, Z.; Yang, L.; Hayes, R.B.; Ahn, J. Sex, body mass index, and dietary fiber intake influence the human gut microbiome. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0124599. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124599] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874569]

15. Nikolova, V.L.; Hall, M.R.; Hall, L.J.; Cleare, A.J.; Stone, J.M.; Young, A.H. Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in psychiatric disorders: A review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry; 2021; 78, pp. 1343-1354. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2573] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34524405]

16. Vieira, A.T.; Castelo, P.M.; Ribeiro, D.A.; Ferreira, C.M. Influence of Oral and Gut Microbiota in the Health of Menopausal Women. Front. Microbiol.; 2017; 8, 1884. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01884]

17. Parida, S.; Sharma, D. The Microbiome-Estrogen Connection and Breast Cancer Risk. Cells; 2019; 8, 1642. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121642] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847455]

18. Flores, R.; Shi, J.; Fuhrman, B.; Xu, X.; Veenstra, T.D.; Gail, M.H.; Gajer, P.; Ravel, J.; Goedert, J.J. Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: A cross-sectional study. J. Transl. Med.; 2012; 10, 253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-253] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23259758]

19. Kwa, M.; Plottel, C.S.; Blaser, M.J.; Adams, S. The Intestinal Microbiome and Estrogen Receptor-Positive Female Breast Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.; 2016; 108, djw029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw029]

20. Khalesi, S.; Bellissimo, N.; Vandelanotte, C.; Williams, S.; Stanley, D.; Irwin, C. A review of probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: Helpful or hype?. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.; 2019; 73, pp. 24-37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0135-9]

21. Mei, Z.; Li, D. The role of probiotics in vaginal health. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2022; 12, 963868. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.963868]

22. Falagas, M.E.; Betsi, G.I.; Tokas, T.; Athanasiou, S. Probiotics for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in women. Drugs; 2006; 66, pp. 1253-1261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200666090-00007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16827601]

23. Reid, G. The development of probiotics for women’s health. Can. J. Microbiol.; 2017; 63, pp. 269-277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2016-0733] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28177795]

24. He, F.F.; Li, Y.M. Role of gut microbiota in the development of insulin resistance and the mechanism underlying polycystic ovary syndrome: A review. J. Ovarian Res.; 2020; 13, 73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00670-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552864]

25. Zhou, L.; Ni, Z.; Cheng, W.; Yu, J.; Sun, S.; Zhai, D.; Yu, C.; Cai, Z. Characteristic gut microbiota and predicted metabolic functions in women with PCOS. Endocr. Connect.; 2020; 9, pp. 63-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0522]

26. Qi, X.; Yun, C.; Sun, L.; Xia, J.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, X.; Wang, L. et al. Gut microbiota-bile acid-interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med.; 2019; 25, 1459. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0562-8]

27. Lindheim, L.; Bashir, M.; Münzker, J.; Trummer, C.; Zachhuber, V.; Leber, B.; Horvath, A.; Pieber, T.R.; Gorkiewicz, G.; Stadlbauer, V. et al. Alterations in Gut Microbiome Composition and Barrier Function Are Associated with Reproductive and Metabolic Defects in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Pilot Study. PLoS ONE; 2017; 12, e0168390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168390]

28. Zhao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Xi, H.; Chen, L.; Feng, X. Exploration of the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd.; 2020; 80, pp. 161-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1081-2036]

29. Rizk, M.G.; Thackray, V.G. Intersection of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Gut Microbiome. J. Endocr. Soc.; 2020; 5, bvaa177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa177]

30. Torres, P.J.; Siakowska, M.; Banaszewska, B.; Pawelczyk, L.; Duleba, A.J.; Kelley, S.T.; Thackray, V.G. Gut Microbial Diversity in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Correlates with Hyperandrogenism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.; 2018; 103, pp. 1502-1511. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02153]

31. Yoon, H.S.; Cho, C.H.; Yun, M.S.; Jang, S.J.; You, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Han, D.; Cha, K.H.; Moon, S.H.; Lee, K. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila secretes a glucagon-like peptide-1-inducing protein that improves glucose homeostasis and ameliorates metabolic disease in mice. Nat. Microbiol.; 2021; 6, pp. 563-573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00880-5]

32. NIH. The Relationship of the Intestinal Microbiome and the Menstrual Cycle. 2018; Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03581201 (accessed on 1 February 2022).

33. Ji, Y.J.; Li, H.; Xie, P.F.; Li, Z.H.; Li, H.W.; Yin, Y.L.; Blachier, F.; Kong, X.F. Stages of pregnancy and weaning influence the gut microbiota diversity and function in sows. J. Appl. Microbiol.; 2019; 127, pp. 867-879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14344] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237071]

34. Mallott, E.K.; Borries, C.; Koenig, A.; Amato, K.R.; Lu, A. Reproductive hormones mediate changes in the gut microbiome during pregnancy and lactation in Phayre’s leaf monkeys. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 9961. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66865-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32561791]

35. Koren, O.; Goodrich, J.K.; Cullender, T.C.; Spor, A.; Laitinen, K.; Bäckhed, H.K.; Gonzalez, A.; Werner, J.J.; Angenent, L.T.; Knight, R. et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell; 2012; 150, pp. 470-480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.008]

36. Nuriel-Ohayon, M.; Neuman, H.; Ziv, O.; Belogolovski, A.; Barsheshet, Y.; Bloch, N.; Uzan, A.; Lahav, R.; Peretz, A.; Frishman, S. et al. Progesterone increases Bifidobacterium relative abundance during late pregnancy. Cell Rep.; 2019; 27, pp. 730-736.e3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.075]

37. Jin, M.; Li, D.; Ji, R.; Liu, W.; Xu, X.; Feng, X. Changes in Gut Microorganism in Patients with Positive Immune Antibody-Associated Recurrent Abortion. BioMed Res. Int.; 2020; 2020, 4673250. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4673250] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33015167]

38. Meng, Q.; Ma, M.; Zhang, W.; Bi, Y.; Cheng, P.; Yu, X.; Fu, Y.; Chao, Y.; Ji, T.; Li, J. et al. The gut microbiota during the progression of atherosclerosis in the perimenopausal period shows specific compositional changes and significant correlations with circulating lipid metabolites. Gut Microbes; 2021; 13, pp. 1-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1880220]

39. Mayneris-Perxachs, J.; Arnoriaga-Rodríguez, M.; Luque-Córdoba, D.; Priego-Capote, F.; Pérez-Brocal, V.; Moya, A.; Burokas, A.; Maldonado, R.; Fernández-Real, J.M. Gut microbiota steroid sexual dimorphism and its impact on gonadal steroids: Influences of obesity and menopausal status. Microbiome; 2020; 8, 136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00913-x]

40. Santos-Marcos, J.A.; Rangel-Zuñiga, O.A.; Jimenez-Lucena, R.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Garcia-Carpintero, S.; Malagon, M.M.; Landa, B.B.; Tena-Sempere, M.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Lopez-Miranda, J. et al. Influence of gender and menopausal status on gut microbiota. Maturitas; 2018; 116, pp. 43-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.07.008]

41. Rettedal, E.A.; Ilesanmi-Oyelere, B.L.; Roy, N.C.; Coad, J.; Kruger, M.C. The gut microbiome is altered in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and osteopenia. JBMR Plus; 2021; 5, e10452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10452]

42. He, J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, B.; Xiao, C.; Chen, Z.; Si, F.; Fu, J.; Lin, X.; Zheng, G.; Yu, G. et al. Gut microbiota and metabolite alterations associated with reduced bone mineral density or bone metabolic indexes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Aging; 2020; 12, pp. 8583-8604. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.103168]

43. Wang, Z.; Chen, K.; Wu, C.; Chen, J.; Pan, H.; Liu, Y.; Wu, P.; Yuan, J.; Huang, F.; Lang, J. et al. An emerging role of Prevotella histicola on estrogen deficiency–induced bone loss through the gut microbiota–bone axis in postmenopausal women and in ovariectomized mice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.; 2021; 114, pp. 1304-1313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab194] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34113963]

44. Ozaki, D.; Kubota, R.; Maeno, T.; Abdelhakim, M.; Hitosugi, N. Association between gut microbiota, bone metabolism, and fracture risk in postmenopausal Japanese women. Osteoporos. Int.; 2021; 32, pp. 145-156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05728-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241467]

45. Mikó, E.; Kovács, T.; Sebő, É.; Tóth, J.; Csonka, T.; Ujlaki, G.; Sipos, A.; Szabó, J.; Méhes, G.; Bai, P. Microbiome-Microbial Metabolome-Cancer Cell Interactions in Breast Cancer-Familiar, but Unexplored. Cells; 2019; 8, 293. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8040293]

46. Jacobson, D.; Moore, K.; Gunderson, C.; Rowland, M.; Austin, R.; Honap, T.P.; Xu, J.; Warinner, C.; Sankaranarayanan, K.; Lewis, C.M., Jr. Shifts in gut and vaginal microbiomes are associated with cancer recurrence time in women with ovarian cancer. PeerJ; 2021; 9, e11574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11574] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178459]

47. Sims, T.T.; Colbert, L.E.; Zheng, J.; Delgado Medrano, A.Y.; Hoffman, K.L.; Ramondetta, L.; Jazaeri, A.; Jhingran, A.; Schmeler, K.M.; Daniel, C.R. et al. Gut microbial diversity and genus-level differences identified in cervical cancer patients versus healthy controls. Gynecol. Oncol.; 2019; 155, pp. 237-244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500892]

48. Lindheim, L.; Manti, M.; Fornes, R.; Bashir, M.; Czarnewski, P.; Diaz, O.E.; Seifert, M.; Engstrand, L.; Villablanca, E.J.; Obermayer-Pietsch, B. et al. Reproductive and Behavior Dysfunction Induced by Maternal Androgen Exposure and Obesity Is Likely Not Gut Microbiome-Mediated. J. Endocr. Soc.; 2018; 2, pp. 1363-1380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/js.2018-00266] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534630]

49. Dong, S.; Jiao, J.; Jia, S.; Li, G.; Zhang, W.; Yang, K.; Wang, Z.; Liu, C.; Li, D.; Wang, X. 16S rDNA Full-Length Assembly Sequencing Technology Analysis of Intestinal Microbiome in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2021; 11, 634981. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.634981] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041041]

50. Chu, W.; Han, Q.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, Z.J.; Du, Y. Metagenomic analysis identified microbiome alterations and pathological association between intestinal microbiota and polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril.; 2020; 113, pp. 1286-1298.e4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.027]

51. Sethi, V.; Kurtom, S.; Tarique, M.; Lavania, S.; Malchiodi, Z.; Hellmund, L.; Zhang, L.; Sharma, U.; Giri, B.; Garg, B. et al. Gut Microbiota Promotes Tumor Growth in Mice by Modulating Immune Response. Gastroenterol; 2018; 155, pp. 33-37.e6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.001]

52. Wong, S.H.; Kwong, T.; Wu, C.Y.; Yu, J. Clinical applications of gut microbiota in cancer biology. Semin. Cancer Biol.; 2019; 55, pp. 28-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.05.003]

53. Akbar, N.; Khan, N.A.; Muhammad, J.S.; Siddiqui, R. The role of gut microbiome in cancer genesis and cancer prevention. Health Sci. Rev.; 2022; 2, 100010. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hsr.2021.100010]

54. Zhu, J.; Liao, M.; Yao, Z.; Liang, W.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Ji, Y.; Wei, W.; Tan, A. et al. Breast cancer in postmenopausal women is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Microbiome; 2018; 6, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0515-3]

55. Yi, M.; Yu, S.; Qin, S.; Liu, Q.; Xu, H.; Zhao, W.; Chu, Q.; Wu, K. Gut microbiome modulates efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Hematol. Oncol.; 2018; 11, 47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-018-0592-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580257]

56. Alpuim Costa, D.; Nobre, J.G.; Batista, M.V.; Ribeiro, C.; Calle, C.; Cortes, A.; Marhold, M.; Negreiros, I.; Borralho, P.; Brito, M. et al. Human Microbiota and Breast Cancer-Is There Any Relevant Link?—A Literature Review and New Horizons Toward Personalised Medicine. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 584332. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.584332] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33716996]

57. Muccee, F.; Ghazanfar, S.; Ajmal, W.; Al-Zahrani, M. In-Silico Characterization of Estrogen Reactivating β-Glucuronidase Enzyme in GIT Associated Microbiota of Normal Human and Breast Cancer Patients. Genes; 2022; 13, 1545. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13091545]

58. Lumachi, F.; Santeufemia, D.A.; Basso, S.M. Current medical treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. World J. Biol. Chem.; 2015; 6, pp. 231-239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4331/wjbc.v6.i3.231] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322178]

59. Suraya, R.; Nagano, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Nishimura, Y. Microbiome as a Target for Cancer Therapy. Integr. Cancer Ther.; 2020; 19, 1534735420920721. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735420920721]

60. Hanker, A.B.; Sudhan, D.R.; Arteaga, C.L. Overcoming endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell; 2020; 37, pp. 496-513. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32289273]

61. Scheidemann, E.R.; Shajahan-Haq, A.N. Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 12292. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212292]

62. Cheng, H.; Wang, Z.; Cui, L.; Wen, Y.; Chen, X.; Gong, F.; Yi, H. Opportunities and Challenges of the Human Microbiome in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Oncol.; 2020; 10, 163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00163]

63. Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Gong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Yuan, Z. Altered diversity and composition of the gut microbiome in patients with cervical cancer. AMB Express; 2019; 9, 40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0763-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904962]

64. Mutic, A.D.; Jordan, S.; Edwards, S.M.; Ferranti, E.P.; Thul, T.A.; Yang, I. The postpartum maternal and newborn microbiomes. MCN. Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs.; 2017; 42, pp. 326-331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000374] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049057]

65. Huang, L.; Cai, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Huang, Q.; Luo, G.; Zeng, Z.; Jin, C. et al. Gut microbiota changes in preeclampsia, abnormal placental growth and healthy pregnant women. BMC Microbiol.; 2021; 21, 265. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02327-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34607559]

66. Tian, X.Y.; Xing, J.W.; Zheng, Q.Q.; Gao, P.F. 919 Syrup Alleviates Postpartum Depression by Modulating the Structure and Metabolism of Gut Microbes and Affecting the Function of the Hippocampal GABA/Glutamate System. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2021; 11, 694443. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.694443] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490139]

67. Faas, M.M.; Liu, Y.; Borghuis, T.; van Loo-Bouwman, C.A.; Harmsen, H.; De Vos, P. Microbiota induced changes in the immune response in pregnant mice. Front. Immunol.; 2020; 10, 2976. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02976] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998293]

68. Pelzer, E.S.; Allan, J.A.; Theodoropoulos, C.; Ross, T.; Beagley, K.W.; Knox, C.L. Hormone-dependent bacterial growth, persistence and biofilm formation–a pilot study investigating human follicular fluid collected during IVF cycles. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e49965. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049965] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23226503]

69. Huang, X.; Gao, J.; Zhao, Y.; He, M.; Ke, S.; Wu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, H.; Yang, H.; Chen, C. et al. Dramatic remodeling of the gut microbiome around parturition and its relationship with host serum metabolic changes in sows. Front. Microbiol.; 2019; 10, 2123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02123]

70. Smid, M.C.; Ricks, N.M.; Panzer, A.; Mccoy, A.N.; Azcarate-Peril, M.A.; Keku, T.O.; Boggess, K.A. Maternal gut microbiome biodiversity in pregnancy. Am. J. Perinatol.; 2018; 35, pp. 24-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604412]

71. Di Simone, N.; Santamaria Ortiz, A.; Specchia, M.; Tersigni, C.; Villa, P.; Gasbarrini, A.; Scambia, G.; D’Ippolito, S. Recent insights on the maternal microbiota: Impact on pregnancy outcomes. Front. Immunol.; 2020; 11, 528202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.528202]

72. Sakurai, K.; Kato, T.; Tanabe, H.; Taguchi-Atarashi, N.; Sato, Y.; Eguchi, A.; Watanabe, M.; Ohno, H.; Mori, C. Association between gut microbiota composition and glycoalbumin level during pregnancy in Japanese women: Pilot study from Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health. J. Diabetes Investig.; 2020; 11, pp. 699-706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13177]

73. DiGiulio, D.B.; Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Costello, E.K.; Lyell, D.J.; Robaczewska, A.; Sun, C.L.; Goltsman, D.S.; Wong, R.J.; Shaw, G. et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2015; 112, pp. 11060-11065. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502875112] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283357]

74. Gohir, W.; Whelan, F.J.; Surette, M.G.; Moore, C.; Schertzer, J.D.; Sloboda, D.M. Pregnancy-related changes in the maternal gut microbiota are dependent upon the mother’s periconceptional diet. Gut Microbes; 2015; 6, pp. 310-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1086056] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322500]

75. Berry, A.S.; Pierdon, M.K.; Misic, A.M.; Sullivan, M.C.; O’Brien, K.; Chen, Y.; Murray, S.J.; Ramharack, L.A.; Baldassano, R.N.; Parsons, T.D. et al. Remodeling of the maternal gut microbiome during pregnancy is shaped by parity. Microbiome; 2021; 9, pp. 1-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01089-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34176489]

76. Gosalbes, M.J.; Compte, J.; Moriano-Gutierrez, S.; Vallès, Y.; Jiménez-Hernández, N.; Pons, X.; Artacho, A.; Francino, M.P. Metabolic adaptation in the human gut microbiota during pregnancy and the first year of life. EbioMedicine; 2019; 39, pp. 497-509. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.071]

77. Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Lan, T.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liao, X.; Mi, J. The Dynamic Changes of Gut Microbiota during the Perinatal Period in Sows. Animals; 2020; 10, 2254. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10122254]

78. Fu, H.; He, M.; Wu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ke, S.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Q.; Liu, M.; Jiang, H.; Huang, L. et al. Deep Investigating the Changes of Gut Microbiome and Its Correlation with the Shifts of Host Serum Metabolome Around Parturition in Sows. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 729039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.729039]

79. Sun, B.; Xu, X.; Xia, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Mao, S.; Xiang, X.; Xia, D.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Variation of gut microbiome in free-ranging female tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana) across different reproductive states. Animals; 2021; 11, 39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11010039]

80. Mulak, A.; Taché, Y.; Larauche, M. Sex hormones in the modulation of irritable bowel syndrome. WJG; 2014; 20, pp. 2433-2448. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2433]

81. Bharadwaj, S.; Barber, M.D.; Graff, L.A.; Shen, B. Symptomatology of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease during the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterol. Rep.; 2015; 3, pp. 185-193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gov010]

82. Simmons, L.; Heitkemper, M.; Shaver, J. Gastrointestinal function during the menstrual cycle. Health Care Women Int.; 1988; 9, pp. 201-209. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399338809515818]

83. Wald, A.; Van Thiel, D.H.; Hoechstetter, L.; Gavaler, J.S.; Egler, K.M.; Verm, R.; Scott, L.; Lester, R. Gastrointestinal transit: The effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology; 1981; 80, pp. 1497-1500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(81)90263-8]

84. Sovijit, W.N.; Sovijit, W.E.; Pu, S.; Usuda, K.; Inoue, R.; Watanabe, G.; Yamaguchi, H.; Nagaoka, K. Ovarian progesterone suppresses depression and anxiety-like behaviors by increasing the Lactobacillus population of gut microbiota in ovariectomized mice. Neurosci. Res.; 2021; 168, pp. 76-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2019.04.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022413]

85. Bostanci, N.; Krog, M.C.; Hugerth, L.W.; Bashir, Z.; Fransson, E.; Boulund, F.; Belibasakis, G.N.; Wannerberger, K.; Engstrand, L.; Nielsen, H.S. et al. Dysbiosis of the human oral microbiome during the menstrual cycle and vulnerability to the external exposures of smoking and dietary sugar. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2021; 11, 625229. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.625229] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816334]

86. Baker, J.M.; Al-Nakkash, L.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Estrogen–gut microbiome axis: Physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas; 2017; 103, pp. 45-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.06.025] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778332]

87. Chen, K.L.; Madak-Erdogan, Z. Estrogen and microbiota crosstalk: Should we pay attention?. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.; 2016; 27, pp. 752-755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2016.08.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553057]

88. Bailey, M.T. Stress and Disease-Related Alterations of the Intestinal Microflora across the Life Span of Rhesus Monkeys; The University of Wisconsin-Madison: Madison, WI, USA, 2002.

89. Tilt, L. The Microbiome and the Menstrual Cycle–Is There a Link. 2022. Symprove for Professionals. Available online: https://www.symprove.com/blogs/symprove-for-professionals/the-microbiome-and-the-menstrual-cycle-is-there-a-link (accessed on 15 August 2022).

90. Krog, M.C.; Hugerth, L.W.; Fransson, E.; Bashir, Z.; Andersen, A.N.; Edfeldt, G.; Engstrand, L.; Schuppe-Koistinen, I.; Nielsen, H.S. The Healthy Female Microbiome Across Body Sites: Effect of Hormonal Contraceptives and the Menstrual Cycle. Hum. Reprod.; 2021; 37, pp. 1525-1543. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac094]

91. Song, S.D.; Acharya, K.D.; Zhu, J.E.; Deveney, C.M.; Walther-Antonio, M.R.; Tetel, M.J.; Chia, N. Daily vaginal microbiota fluctuations associated with natural hormonal cycle, contraceptives, diet, and exercise. Msphere; 2020; 5, e00593-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00593-20]

92. Dupuit, M.; Rance, M.; Morel, C.; Bouillon, P.; Boscaro, A.; Boisseau, N.; Vincent, M.; Vazeille, E.; Barnich, N.; Chassaing, B. Impact of concurrent training on body composition and gut microbiota in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc.; 2021; 54, pp. 517-529. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002809]

93. Zhao, H.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Sun, Q.; Qin, P.; Wang, Q. Compositional and functional features of the female premenopausal and postmenopausal gut microbiota. FEBS Lett.; 2019; 593, pp. 2655-2664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13527]

94. Miller, L.M.; Lampe, J.W.; Newton, K.M.; Gundersen, G.; Fuller, S.; Reed, S.D.; Frankenfeld, C.L. Being overweight or obese is associated with harboring a gut microbial community not capable of metabolizing the soy isoflavone daidzein to O-desmethylangolensin in peri-and post-menopausal women. Maturitas; 2017; 99, pp. 37-42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.02.006]

95. Lim, E.Y.; Song, E.J.; Kim, J.G.; Jung, S.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Shin, H.S.; Nam, Y.D.; Kim, Y.T. Lactobacillus intestinalis YT2 restores the gut microbiota and improves menopausal symptoms in ovariectomized rats. Benef. Microbes; 2021; 12, pp. 503-516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3920/BM2020.0217] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34463192]

96. Choi, S.; Hwang, Y.J.; Shin, M.J.; Yi, H. Difference in the gut microbiome between ovariectomy-induced obesity and diet-induced obesity. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2017; 27, pp. 2228-2236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1710.10001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29121700]

97. Lv, W.Q.; Lin, X.; Shen, H.; Liu, H.M.; Qiu, X.; Li, B.Y.; Shen, W.D.; Ge, C.L.; Lv, F.Y.; Shen, J. et al. Human gut microbiome impacts skeletal muscle mass via gut microbial synthesis of the short-chain fatty acid butyrate among healthy menopausal women. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle; 2021; 12, pp. 1860-1870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12788] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34472211]

98. Cox-York, K.A.; Sheflin, A.M.; Foster, M.T.; Gentile, C.L.; Kahl, A.; Koch, L.G.; Britton, S.L.; Weir, T.L. Ovariectomy results in differential shifts in gut microbiota in low versus high aerobic capacity rats. Physiol. Rep.; 2015; 3, e12488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12488]

99. Goedert, J.J.; Jones, G.; Hua, X.; Xu, X.; Yu, G.; Flores, R.; Falk, R.T.; Gail, M.H.; Shi, J.; Ravel, J. et al. Investigation of the association between the fecal microbiota and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: A population-based case-control pilot study. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst.; 2015; 107, djv147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv147]

100. Fuhrman, B.J.; Feigelson, H.S.; Flores, R.; Gail, M.H.; Xu, X.; Ravel, J.; Goedert, J.J. Associations of the fecal microbiome with urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.; 2014; 99, pp. 4632-4640. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2222]

101. He, C.; Liu, Y.; Ye, S.; Yin, S.; Gu, J. Changes of intestinal microflora of breast cancer in premenopausal women. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.; 2021; 40, pp. 503-513. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04036-x]

102. Jett, S.; Malviya, N.; Schelbaum, E.; Jang, G.; Jahan, E.; Clancy, K.; Hristov, H.; Pahlajani, S.; Niotis, K.; Loeb-Zeitlin, S. et al. Endogenous and Exogenous Estrogen Exposures: How Women’s Reproductive Health Can Drive Brain Aging and Inform Alzheimer's Prevention. Front. Aging Neurosci.; 2022; 14, 831807. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.831807]

103. Kim, M.S.; Kim, Y.; Choi, H.; Kim, W.; Park, S.; Lee, D.; Kim, D.K.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, H.; Hyun, D.W. et al. Transfer of a healthy microbiota reduces amyloid and tau pathology in an Alzheimer’s disease animal model. Gut; 2020; 69, pp. 283-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317431]

104. Chen, C.; Liao, J.; Xia, Y.; Liu, X.; Jones, R.; Haran, J.; McCormick, B.; Sampson, T.R.; Alam, A.; Ye, K. Gut microbiota regulate Alzheimer’s disease pathologies and cognitive disorders via PUFA-associated neuroinflammation. Gut; 2022; 71, pp. 2233-2252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326269]

105. Shieh, A.; Epeldegui, M.; Karlamangla, A.S.; Greendale, G.A. Gut permeability, inflammation, and bone density across the menopause transition. JCI Insight; 2020; 5, e134092. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.134092]

106. Chen, L.; Yan, S.; Yang, M.; Yu, F.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, H.; Shi, J.; Pan, L.; Zeng, Y. et al. The gut microbiome is associated with bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Transl. Res.; 2021; 13, pp. 12601-12613. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34956476]

107. Lambert, M.N.T.; Thybo, C.B.; Lykkeboe, S.; Rasmussen, L.M.; Frette, X.; Christensen, L.P.; Jeppesen, P.B. Combined bioavailable isoflavones and probiotics improve bone status and estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal osteopenic women: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.; 2017; 106, pp. 909-920. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.117.153353] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768651]

108. Ostadmohammadi, V.; Jamilian, M.; Bahmani, F.; Asemi, Z. Vitamin D and probiotic co-supplementation affects mental health, hormonal, inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Ovarian Res.; 2019; 12, 5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0480-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30665436]

109. Jamilian, M.; Mansury, S.; Bahmani, F.; Heidar, Z.; Amirani, E.; Asemi, Z. The effects of probiotic and selenium co-supplementation on parameters of mental health, hormonal profiles, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Ovarian Res.; 2018; 11, 80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0457-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217229]

110. Laborda-Illanes, A.; Sanchez-Alcoholado, L.; Dominguez-Recio, M.E.; Jimenez-Rodriguez, B.; Lavado, R.; Comino-Méndez, I.; Alba, E.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I. Breast and gut microbiota action mechanisms in breast cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Cancers; 2020; 12, 2465. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092465]

111. Szulińska, M.; Łoniewski, I.; Skrypnik, K.; Sobieska, M.; Korybalska, K.; Suliburska, J.; Bogdański, P. Multispecies probiotic supplementation favorably affects vascular function and reduces arterial stiffness in obese postmenopausal women—A 12-week placebo-controlled and randomized clinical study. Nutrients; 2018; 10, 1672. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10111672]

112. Kim, C.S.; Cha, L.; Sim, M.; Jung, S.; Chun, W.Y.; Baik, H.W.; Shin, D.M. Probiotic supplementation improves cognitive function and mood with changes in gut microbiota in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. J. Gerontol. Ser. A; 2021; 76, pp. 32-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa090] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300799]

113. Li, X.; Lv, C.; Song, J.; Li, J. Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Cognitive Function and Metabolic Status in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Nutr.; 2021; 8, 757673. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.757673]

114. Bermingham, K.M.; Linenberg, I.; Hall, W.L.; Kadé, K.; Franks, P.W.; Davies, R.; Wolf, J.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.; Asnicar, F.; Segata, N. et al. Menopause is associated with postprandial metabolism, metabolic health and lifestyle: The ZOE PREDICT study. EBioMedicine; 2022; 85, 104303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104303]