Static and Resonant Properties and Magnetic Phase Diagram of LiMn2TeO6

Abstract

Physical properties of the mixed-valent tellurate of lithium and manganese, LiMn₂TeO₆, were investigated in measurements of ac and dc magnetic susceptibility χ, magnetization M, specific heat C_p, electron spin resonance (ESR), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the temperature range 2–300 K under magnetic field up to 9 T. The title compound orders magnetically in two steps at T₁ = 20 K and T₂ = 13 K. The intermediate phase at T₂ < T < T₁ is fully suppressed by magnetic field µ₀H of about 4 T. Besides magnetic phases transitions firmly established in static measurements, relaxation-type phenomena were observed well above magnetic ordering temperature in resonant measurements.

1. Introduction

Mixed valence manganese oxides exhibit colossal magnetoresistance effect [1,2,3,4] and attract attention as prospective materials in lithium-ion industry [5,6,7,8]. Moreover, it has been found that they are capable of strong light adsorption in the solar spectrum range and may serve as magnetic sensors, spintronic, and magnetocaloric devices [9,10,11,12,13]. Along with numerous applications, manganites are quite attractive in fundamental research due to presence of spin, charge, and orbital degrees of freedom often entangled [14,15,16,17,18]. The physics of these systems relates to metal-insulator transition, competing exchange interactions and magnetic frustration [19,20,21,22].

In contrast to the widely studied Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺ mixed-valent oxides, the properties of Mn²⁺/Mn³⁺ mixed-valent materials are less explored. Although multiple compounds (starting from hausmannite Mn₃O₄) are known to contain simultaneously Mn²⁺ and Mn³⁺, these cations sit usually on different crystallographic sites and only rarely mix on the same site. Lithium manganese tellurate Li₂Mn₄Te₂O₁₂ (LiMn₂TeO₆ for short) belongs to this minority [23]. With average oxidation state of 2.5, Mn ions occupy four non-equivalent octahedral positions, but only two of them are definite Mn²⁺ and Mn³⁺, whereas two others are supposedly mixed Mn²⁺/Mn³⁺ sites.

Triclinic crystal structure of LiMn₂TeO₆ can be considered as a heavily distorted variant of the orthorhombic Pnn2 structure of Li₂TiTeO₆ [24] with Li/Mn ordering on two independent Li sites. Note that Li₂TiTeO₆ itself is a superstructure derived from LiSbO₃ [25]. The differences between these three structures allow considering LiMn₂TeO₆ as a new structural type. Ordering of cations may only destroy both glide planes of Pnn2 structure leading to a monoclinic space group P112 but not to the triclinic distortion since all cations in Li₂TiTeO₆ reside on the two-fold axes.The Jahn–Teller effect of Mn³⁺ ions and/or Mn–Mn interactions seem to be the reasons of the triclinic distortion [23].Here, we report a comprehensive study of thermodynamic and magnetic resonance properties of the lithium manganese tellurate LiMn₂TeO₆.

2. Experimental

The preparation of LiMn₂TeO₆ powder samples by conventional solid-state reaction and their phase analysis, redox analysis, and crystal structure determination have been described in detail earlier [23]. Here, we used samples from the same work, stored in a tightly closed container in a desiccator. Their identity was confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Thermodynamic properties of the title compound, that is the magnetization M and specific heat C_p, were studied using various options of Quantum Design Physical Properties Measurements System PPMS-9T in the temperature range 2–300 K under magnetic field up to 9 T.

The crystal structure of LiMn₂TeO₆ [23] contains four different positions of manganese, as shown in Figure 1. One can find planar, chain, and dimer motives in the crystal lattice, but none of them dominates. Therefore, we cannot treat this system as purely two- or one-dimensional. The picture is complicated by the mixed valence of manganese ions. The magnetism relates to a large number of exchange interactions, different in both magnitude and sign: at least one of the bonds has an angle close to 90°, and therefore, is characterized by a ferromagnetic exchange.

Electron spin resonance (ESR) studies were carried out using an X-band ESR spectrometer “Adani” CMS 8400 (f ≈ 9.4 GHz, B ≤ 0.7 T) equipped with a low-temperature mount, operating in the range T = 6–450 K. The effective g-factors have been calculated with respect to an external reference for the resonance field. BDPA with g_et = 2.00359 has been used as a reference material.

The ⁷Li (I = 3/2) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were measured using “Tecmag” pulse solid-state NMR spectrometer at various frequencies in the range 10–110 MHz. The NMR spectra were obtained by point-by-point integration of the intensity of the Hahn echo versus magnetic field. The spin-lattice relaxation has been studied by saturation recovery pulse sequence and stimulated echo. In the NMR field sweep spectra, it was not possible to resolve the central line and quadrupole satellites. Thus, the spin-lattice relaxation time T₁ was obtained from the fitting of nuclear spin-echo decay with exponential function.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electron Spin Resonance

In the whole temperature range, a single Lorentzian absorption line has been observed which can be ascribed to overlapping signals from Mn²⁺ and Mn³⁺ ions (Figure 2a). Upon lowering temperature, the signal broadens and eventually disappears below 30 K. Such a signal fading implies proximity to an onset of the long-range antiferromagnetic order and opening of the energy gap for resonance excitations. The main ESR parameters as obtained from fitting in accordance with Lorenzian profile [26] are shown in Figure 2b. The halfwidth ΔB of the ESR signal monotonously broadens with lowering temperature indicating presence of short-range correlation effects in the magnetic subsystem of LiMn₂TeO₆. The effective g-factor remains temperature-independent in the range 100–450 K and its value g ~1.98 ± 0.02 is typical for the manganese ions in the high-spin states of Mn²⁺ and Mn³⁺ in octahedral environment. Below 100 K, the effective g-factor deviates from linearity, indicating the effect of short-range magnetic correlations. The temperature dependence of the integral ESR intensity χ_ESR(T) is shown in Figure 3a.

3.2. Magnetization

The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/B in LiMn₂TeO₆ is shown in the left panel of Figure 3. At elevated temperatures, the χ(T) curve follows the Curie–Weiss law with addition of a temperature-independent term χ = χ₀ + C/(T−Θ), where C = 7.35 emu/mol K is the Curie constant and Θ = −95 K is the Weiss temperature. The diamagnetic term χ₀ = −5×10⁻⁴ emu/mol was found to be in agreement with the sum of Pascal’s constants [27] of the ions constituting the LiMn₂TeO₆ compound. The negative value of the Weiss temperature indicates the predominance of antiferromagnetic exchange while the value of Curie constant corresponds to a system with equal numbers of Mn²⁺ (spin S = 5/2) and Mn³⁺ (spin S = 2) ions at averaged g-factor g = 1.98 ± 0.02. Upon decreasing the temperature, the χ(T) dependence exhibits a sharp maximum at about T_N = 20 K, indicating the long-range antiferromagnetic order. With further cooling, an additional intense peak appears at T^* = 13 K which is sensitive to the measurement protocol, i.e., either zero-field cooling (ZFC) or field cooling (FC) regimes. This fact is illustrated by the inset in Figure 3a.

To further elucidate the magnetic behavior of LiMn₂TeO₆ at low temperatures, we measured the M(T) dependences for the LiMn₂TeO₆ sample at various magnetic fields up to 9 T, as shown in Figure 3b. Upon increasing the magnetic field, the position of the T^* anomaly noticeably shifts to higher temperature, while the maximum at T_Ndemonstrates the opposite trend. At the field B~ 4 T, both anomalies merge into one phase boundary, and anomaly broadens with increasing external field.

It has been found that magnetization isotherms M(B) display neither hysteresis nor saturation in magnetic fields up to 9 T, as shown in Figure 4. Below T* ~ 13 K, M(B) curves deviate upward which is expected for the spin-flop transition. Above T* ~ 13 K, this trend changes to the opposite and M(B) curves deviate downward from linearity.

3.3. acMagnetic Susceptibility

ac susceptibility χ_ac was measured in the frequency range 0.1–10 kHz. These data are shown in the left panel of Figure 5. The real part of susceptibility χ′ shows anomalies at 13 K and 20 K, similar to that found in dc magnetization. The behavior of both anomalies differs with the frequency variation. The position of the peak at T₁ = 20 K stays the same while the peak at T₂ = 13 K shifts to higher temperatures with increasing frequency. In the whole temperature range, the imaginary part χ″ is close to zero.

It is worth noting that the behavior of both anomalies with frequency variation is significantly different (inset in Figure 5a). The position of the peak at T₁ remains the same, and this peak can be related to establishment of long-range order. The peak at T₂ is frequency sensitive which is inherent to cluster spin glasses (see Supplementary Materials). The shifts of T₁ and T₂ under external magnetic field agree with static thermodynamic data, as shown in Figure 5b. An increase of the magnetic field above 4 T leads to the shift of the position of the merged anomaly to higher temperatures.

3.4. Specific Heat

The temperature dependence of specific heat C_p in LiMn₂TeO₆ at B = 0 T shown in the left panel of Figure 6 is in good agreement with dc magnetic susceptibility measurements showing two distinct anomalies at T₁ and T₂.

The jump of specific heat at T₁ equals ∆C_m = 18.7 J/mol K, as shown in the lower inset to Figure 6a. This value is two times lower than predicted in the mean field theory ∆C_theor≈ 38.8 J/mol K [28]. Magnetic entropy ∆S_m is also shown in this inset. It saturates at ~50 K reaching about 20 J/mol K. This value is again markedly lower than the magnetic entropy change expected from the mean-field theory ∆S_theor = 28.3 J/(mol K) [28]. Overall, these data signal the formation of the short-range correlation regime in LiMn₂TeO₆ well above the Néel temperature.

The temperature dependences of specific heat C_p(T) taken at various magnetic fields in LiMn₂TeO₆ are shown in Figure 6b. As is the case of magnetization measurements, the application of a magnetic field slightly shifts downward the position of anomaly at T₁ and shifts upward the anomaly at T₂.

3.5. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

To study in detail the low energy spin dynamics at the microscopic level in the region of fraction of micro-eV energy scales, we have carried out ⁷Li NMR investigations. The crystal structure suggests the presence of Li in two non-equivalent sites in LiMn₂TeO₆ with different Mn environments. Therefore, the observed ⁷Li NMR spectrum is a superposition of the contributions from all lithium nuclei in powder specimen. Insight into the dynamic spin correlations is provided by the ⁷Li spin-lattice relaxation rate R₁measurements. The low-temperature part of the T-dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation measured in two different external fields is shown in the left panel of Figure 7. The peaks in the temperature dependence of the relaxation correspond to the phase transition temperatures, which is about 18 K at 6.6 T external field, and 20 K at 1.8 T. Above the magnetic phase transition, a critical increase in the relaxation rate is observed, which at 1.8 T is well described by the critical exponent p ≈ 0.48. This value is close to the predictions of the mean field theory for a three-dimensional magnet [29]. At 6.6 T, an extended region of continuous increase of the relaxation rate with cooling is observed above the peak, indicating development of a very slow dynamics and strong spin correlations.

One can compare the local static and dynamic susceptibility obtained from NMR data with the bulk static susceptibility. The nuclear spin lattice relaxation in magnets is usually governed by magnetic fluctuations in the electronic spin system and R₁T⁻¹ is proportional to the imaginary part of the local dynamic susceptibility χ″ [30]:

(1)${\left(T_{1}T\right)}^{-1}\propto {\displaystyle \sum _q{A}_{\perp }^2\left(\overrightarrow{q},\omega \right)}\cdot \frac{{\chi }^{″}\left(\overrightarrow{q},\omega \right)}{\omega }$

Here, A is the q-dependent hyperfine constant, q is the wave vector and ω is the Larmor frequency. As shown in Figure 7, the local dynamic spin susceptibility R₁T⁻¹ probed by NMR at the external field of 6.6 T is proportional to the bulk static susceptibility in the temperature range 90–250 K manifesting the paramagnetic regime of the electron spin system. Below 90 K, the dependence deviates from this linearity indicating the slowing down of spin fluctuations and development of correlations.

The establishment of the antiferromagnetic order is reflected in the NMR spectra, which acquire a step-like shape that is specific for powders in such cases. The rectangle components of such a spectrum correspond to magnetically non-equivalent positions of lithium in an ordered state. The shape of the individual rectangles can be described by the equation [31]:

(2)$f\left(H,H_A,H_0\right)\propto \frac{1}{4H_A}\left|1+\frac{H_0^2-H_A^2}{H^2}\right|$

for |H₀ − H_A| ≤ H ≤ H₀ + H_A. Here, H₀ = γ_nω_L, H_A is a local internal field, ω_L is the paramagnetic Larmor frequency, and γ_n is a nuclear gyromagnetic ratio. For proper interpretation of the results, a correction of the spectrum intensity to the magnitude of the measurement fields was made. The resulting spectra obtained at 12 K are shown in Figure 8 by green color. All spectra contain the narrow gaussian contribution at H_G = H₀ + 0.11 T with the width ~0.3 T and the intensity of about 3–4% of total intensity of the spectra (dark grey line) which apparently refers to a small fraction of the diamagnetic impurity.

Subtracting this Gaussian component from the experimental spectrum, one can obtain the ⁷Li NMR spectrum in LiMn₂TeO₆ (blue line). The modeling of the spectra with the 0.6 T, 1 T, and 1.7 T according to the formula (2) gives almost equal sets of the basic fitting parameters for three different lithium positions: H₀ is a Larmor field, H_A⁽¹⁾ ≈ 0.37 T, H_A⁽²⁾ ≈ 0.185 T, H_A⁽³⁾ ≈ 0.1 T and relative intensities I⁽¹⁾≈ 50%, I⁽²⁾≈ 30%, I⁽³⁾≈ 20%. The obtained intensity ratio I⁽¹⁾/(I⁽²⁾+I⁽³⁾) is close to the ratio of the filling of structural positions (Li1:Li2 ~ 5:4). It indicates the appearance of the magnetically nonequivalent atoms in at least one of the structural positions. A strong increase in the external field up to 6.6 T leads to a partial tilting of the manganese spins along the field direction that distorts the shape of the spectrum and, strictly speaking, makes Equation (2) inapplicable. Using it formally, we can get the following simulation parameters: H_A⁽¹⁾ ≈ 0.32 T, H_A⁽²⁾ ≈ 0.175 T and H_A⁽³⁾ ≈ 0.095T, I⁽¹⁾≈ 50%, I⁽²⁾≈ 27%, I⁽³⁾≈ 23%, but central field of each rectangles is no more H₀ = 6.648 T but it shifts steadily to higher values: H₀⁽¹⁾ ≈ 6.67 T, H₀⁽²⁾ ≈ 6.68 T, and H₀⁽³⁾ ≈ 6.7 T. Such a different shift of the zero field on different lithium positions indicates the presence of a component of the internal field, collinear to the external one, caused by the tilting of spins in AFM sublattices in a strong external field. The absence of any changes in the spectral shape, except for those caused by gradual tilting of spins in a magnetic field, allows to attribute all these spectra to the same type of magnetic structure and the same magnetic phase.

The temperature transformation of the NMR spectrum in the ordered state obtained at 1.8 T is shown in Figure 9. The shape of the NMR spectrum changes with temperature. The Néel temperature is clearly seen in the line width that dramatically increases below 20K. A pronounced step-like profile is present at temperatures of 12.5 and 10 K. At 15.5 K, the spectrum structure is less resolvable and the width is smaller. At low temperatures, the line is smoothed, especially on the high-field shoulder, and, at the same time, has a significantly large width.

4. Discussion

The static magnetic properties of LiMn₂TeO₆ are firmly established in measurements of dc magnetic susceptibility, magnetization, specific heat. Summarizing the experimental results, the magnetic phase diagram for LiMn₂TeO₆ has been established, as shown in Figure 10. At lowering temperature, the title compound orders antiferromagnetically at T₁ = 20 K and experiences second magnetic phase transition at T₂ = 13 K. The intermediate phase at T₂ < T < T₁ is fully suppressed by an external magnetic field of 4 T. Such behavior is frequently observed in compounds which experience consecutive incommensurate and commensurate magnetic orders. The antiferromagnetic type of ordering at both T < T₂and T₂ < T < T₁ is confirmed by the rectangular shape of the ⁷Li NMR line.

The dynamics of the spin system was examined by NMR and EPR. LiMn₂TeO₆ is characterized by an extended region of developed correlations above T_N. X-band ESR signal disappears at about 40 K. Dynamic susceptibility on MHz timescale measured by NMR relaxation rate shows noticeable deviations from the bulk susceptibility below ~50K. Moreover, while the T₁⁻¹(T) dependence obtained at 1.75 T is govern by 3D critical regime in the upper vicinity of T_N, it is not the case at higher magnetic fields. Such behavior proves the development a slow Mn spin correlations well above the ordering temperature. Usually if the correlations in a magnetic system slow down with decreasing temperature, it is usually followed, almost immediately, by a static ordered or glassy regime. The wide temperature range of slow and not three-dimensional correlations indicates that magnetism of LiMn₂TeO₆is determined by a complex network of Mn³⁺ and Mn⁴⁺ exchange interactions which are of different magnitude and partially frustrated. The competition of these interactions apparently causes the appearance of an intermediate phase below the Néel temperature.

It could be of interest to compare physical properties of LiMn₂TeO₆ with those of its iso-elemental counterpart Li₂MnTeO₆ [22]. While the magnetic susceptibility of Li₂MnTeO₆ shows no obvious anomaly indicative of a long-range magnetic order at low magnetic fields, at high magnetic field it evidences the antiferromagnetic-type peak at about 9 K confirmed also by specific heat measurements. Furthermore, this conclusion is supported also by ⁷Li NMR data and dielectric permittivity measurements. Density functional theory calculations lead to a 120° noncollinear spin arrangement which agrees with the magnetic structure defined in neutron-diffraction measurements.

Despite similar chemical compositions of LiMn₂TeO₆ and Li₂MnTeO₆, their physical properties differ drastically due the difference of oxidation states, i.e., Mn²⁺/Mn³⁺ in the former compound and Mn⁴⁺ in the latter compound. Mixed valence of manganese results in the appearance of ferromagnetic double exchange on the background of antiferromagnetic superexchange in LiMn₂TeO₆ to be compared with purely antiferromagnetic exchange in Li₂MnTeO₆.

5. Summary

Summarizing, the competition of various exchange interactions and the presence of both divalent and trivalent manganese ions in LiMn₂TeO₆ leads to the two-step formation of antiferromagnetic state at T₁ = 20 K and T₂ = 13 K. The phase at T₂ < T < T₁ is readily suppressed by an external magnetic field µ₀H of 4 T. At high fields, well above the Néel temperature, an extended correlation region is found, characterized by large correlation time. It can be explained by the multicomponent nature of the magnetic system, which has a complicated geometry and is partially frustrated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V. and H.-H.K.; Methodology, T.V., T.S., V.N. and S.D.; Validation, V.N. and R.S.; Formal analysis, H.-H.K.; Investigation, T.V., E.V., T.S., S.D. and R.S.; Writing—review & editing, A.V.; Supervision, A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This project was initially developed by Elena Zvereva who passed away early in 2021. A part of the thermodynamic data presented in this paper were obtained by Elena. This research has been supported by the Megagrant program of the Government of Russian Federation through the project 075-15-2021-604. E.V. and T.S would like to thank the financial support from the government assignment for FRC Kazan scientific Center of RAS. Magnetic studies by T.V. were support by Russian Scientific Foundation through Grant No. 22-42-08002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Figure 1. Arrangement of manganese ions in the crystal structure of LiMn2TeO6 in different planes.

Figure 2. (a) ESR spectrum taken at room temperature. (b) The temperature dependences of the effective g-factor and ESR linewidth ∆B in LiMn2TeO6.

Figure 3. (a) The temperature dependences of the magnetic susceptibility recorded in ZFC (blue open symbols) and FC (black sphere) regimes at B = 0.1 T and the integrated ESR intensity (light green diamond) along with inverse magnetic susceptibility 1/χ. The red solid line represents an approximation in accordance with the Curie-Weiss law. (b) The M(T) curves for the LiMn2TeO6 taken at various external magnetic fields.

Figure 4. The magnetization isotherms at T<T2 (lower curve) and at T2 <T<T1 in LiMn2TeO6.

Figure 5. (a) Real χ′ part of the ac magnetic susceptibility at various frequencies. Inset: the zoomed-in region of real χ′ near transitions. (b) The temperature dependencies of real part χ′ of the ac magnetic susceptibility at various magnetic fields at f = 10 kHz.

Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependence of the specific heat in LiMn2TeO6 in zero magnetic field. Upper inset highlights the two-step transition at low temperatures. Dash line represents the lattice specific heat within frames of Debye model. Lower inset shows magnetic specific heat Cm(T) and magnetic entropy ∆Sm. (b) Temperature dependences of specific heat Cp(T) in LiMn2TeO6 at various magnetic fields.

Figure 7. Temperature dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation rate R1 in LiMn2TeO6 at two external fields. Solid circles correspond to 6.6 T, open circles to 1.75 T. Dashed line is a critical exponent for 1.75 T (see text).

Figure 8. NMR spectra at 12 K obtained in LiMn2TeO6 under different external field.

Figure 9. 7Li NMR spectrum for LiMn2TeO6 at low temperatures in different external field. Dotted lines mark the phase boundaries (see paragraph 4).

Figure 10. The magnetic phase diagram for tellurate LiMn2TeO6.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15238694/s1, Figure S1: Critical slowing down behavior of the peak position Tf.; Figure S2: 7Li NMR spectrum for LiMn2TeO6 at different temperatures in low and high external fields.

References

1. Bebenin, N.G.; Zainullina, R.I.; Ustinov, V.V. Colossal magnetoresistance manganites. Phys. -Uspekhi; 2018; 61, pp. 719-738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.2017.07.038180]

2. Wagner, P.; Wackers, G.; Cardinaletti, I.; Manca, J.; Vanacken, J. From colossal magnetoresistance to solar cells: An overview on 66 years of research into perovskites. Phys. Status Solidi A; 2017; 214, 1700394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201700394]

3. Raveau, B. The crucial role of mixed valence in the magnetoresistance properties of manganites and cobaltites. Phil. Trans. R Soc. A; 2008; 366, pp. 83-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2141] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17827124]

4. Şen, C.; Alvarez, G.; Dagotto, E. Competing Ferromagnetic and Charge-Ordered States in Models for Manganites: The Origin of the Colossal Magnetoresistance Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.; 2007; 98, 127202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.127202] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17501153]

5. Armstrong, A.R.; Bruce, P.G. Synthesis of layered LiMnO₂ as an electrode for rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature; 1996; 381, pp. 499-500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/381499a0]

6. Huang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Li, S.; Lee, J.; Wang, C.; Zhu, Z.; Xue, W.; Li, Y.; Li, J. Lithium Manganese Spinel Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.; 2021; 11, 2000997. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000997]

7. Thackeray, M.M.; Lee, E.; Shi, B.; Croy, J.R. Review–From LiMn₂O₄ to Partially-Disordered Li₂MnNiO₄: The Evolution of Lithiated-Spinel Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc.; 2022; 169, 020535. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac50dd]

8. Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, H. Reviving the lithium-manganese-based layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Matter; 2021; 4, pp. 1511-1527. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.023]

9. Wolf, S.A.; Awschalom, D.D.; Buhrman, R.A.; Daughton, J.M.; von Molnár, S.; Roukes, M.L.; Chtchelkanova, A.Y.; Treger, D.M. Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future. Science; 2001; 294, pp. 1488-1495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1065389]

10. Yang, Q.; Yao, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, W.; Zuo, X.; Tang, H.; Wu, M.; Li, G. Perovskite-type La_1−xCa_xMnO₃ manganese oxides as effective counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Electroanalyt. Chem.; 2019; 833, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.006]

11. Gager, E.; Frye, M.; McCord, D.; Scheffe, J.C.; Nino, J. Reticulated porous lanthanum strontium manganite structures for solar thermochemical hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy; 2022; 47, pp. 31152-31164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.052]

12. Riaz, A.; Kreider, P.; Kremer, F.; Tabassum, H.; Yeoh, J.S.; Lipiński, W.; Lowe, A. Electrospun Manganese-Based Perovskites as Efficient Oxygen Exchange Redox Materials for Improved Solar Thermochemical CO₂ Splitting. ACS Appl. Energy Mater.; 2019; 2, pp. 2494-2505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b01994]

13. Sánchez-Ochoa, F.; Springborg, M. Silver hollandite (Ag_xMn₈O₁₆, x < 2): A highly anisotropic half-metal for spintronics. Phys. Rev. Mat.; 2021; 5, 095001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.095001]

14. Prodi, A.; Gilioli, E.; Gauzzi, A.; Licci, F.; Marezio, M.; Bolzoni, F.; Huang, Q.; Santoro, A.; Lynn, J.W. Charge, orbital and spin ordering phenomena in the mixed valence manganite (NaMn³⁺₃)(Mn³⁺₂Mn⁴⁺₂)O₁₂. Nat. Mater.; 2004; 3, pp. 48-52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1038]

15. Coey, M. Charge-ordering in oxides. Nature; 2004; 430, pp. 155-157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/430155a]

16. Qiu, X.; Proffen, T.; Mitchell, J.F.; Billinge, S.J.L. Orbital Correlations in the Pseudocubic O and Rhombohedral R Phases of LaMnO₃. Phys. Rev. Lett.; 2005; 94, 177203. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.177203]

17. Johnson, R.D.; Mezzadri, F.; Manuel, P.; Khalyavin, D.D.; Gilioli, E.; Radaelli, P.G. Evolution of Magneto-Orbital order Upon B-Site Electron Doping in Na_1−xCa_xMn₇O₁₂ Quadruple Perovskite Manganites. Phys. Rev. Lett.; 2018; 120, 257202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.257202]

18. Volkova, O.S.; Shvanskaya, L.V.; Ovchenkov, E.A.; Zvereva, E.A.; Volkov, A.S.; Chareev, D.A.; Molla, K.; Rahaman, B.; Saha-Dasgupta, T.; Vasiliev, A.N. Structure–Property Relationships in α-, β′-, and γ-Modifications of Mn₃(PO₄)₂. Inorg. Chem.; 2016; 55, pp. 10692-10700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01942]

19. Ederer, C.; Spaldin, N.A. A new route to magnetic ferroelectrics. Nat. Mater.; 2004; 3, pp. 849-851. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1265]

20. Rairigh, R.P.; Singh-Bhalla, G.; Tongay, S.; Dhakal, T.; Biswas, A.; Hebard, A.F. Colossal magnetocapacitance and scale-invariant dielectric response in phase-separated manganites. Nat. Phys.; 2007; 3, pp. 551-555. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys626]

21. Kurbakov, A.I.; Susloparova, A.E.; Pomjakushin, V.Y.; Skourski, Y.; Vavilova, E.L.; Vasilchikova, T.M.; Raganyan, G.V.; Vasiliev, A.N. Commensurate helicoidal order in the triangular layered magnet Na₂MnTeO₆. Phys. Rev. B; 2022; 105, 064416. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.064416]

22. Zvereva, E.A.; Raganyan, G.V.; Vasilchikova, T.M.; Nalbandyan, V.B.; Gafurov, D.A.; Vavilova, E.L.; Zakharov, K.V.; Koo, H.-J.; Pomjakushin, V.Y.; Susloparova, A.E. et al. Hidden magnetic order in the triangular-lattice magnet Li₂MnTeO₆. Phys. Rev. B; 2020; 102, 094433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.094433]

23. Pospelov, A.A.; Nalbandyan, V.B.; Serikova, E.I.; Medvedev, B.S.; Evstigneeva, M.A.; Ni, E.V.; Lukov, V.V. Crystal structure and properties of a new mixed-valence compound LiMn₂TeO₆ and the survey of the LiMM′XO₆ family (X = Sb or Te). Solid State Sci.; 2011; 13, pp. 1931-1937. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.08.019]

24. Choisnet, A.J.; Rulmont, A.; Tarte, P. Ordering phenomena in the LiSbO₃ type structure: The new mixed tellurates Li₂TiTeO₆ and Li₂SnTeO₆. J. Solid State Chem.; 1989; 82, pp. 272-278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(89)90292-2]

25. Genkina, E.A. Accurate definition of LiSbO₃ crystal structure. Kristallografiya; 1992; 37, pp. 356-358.

26. Ivanshin, V.A.; Deisenhofer, J.; Krug von Nidda, H.-A.; Loidl, A.; Mukhin, A.; Balbashov, J.; Eremin, M.V. ESR study in lightly doped La_1−xSr_xMnO₃. Phys. Rev. B: Cond. Matter Mater. Phys.; 2000; 61, pp. 6213-6219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.6213]

27. Bain, G.A.; Berry, J.F. Diamagnetic Corrections and Pascal’s Constants. J. Chem. Educ.; 2008; 85, pp. 532-536. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed085p532]

28. Tari, A. The Specific Heat of Matter at Low Temperatures; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2003.

29. Stanley, H.E. Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.

30. Moriya, T. The Effect of Electron-Electron Interaction on the Nuclear Spin Relaxation in Metals. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.; 1963; 18, pp. 516-520. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.18.516]

31. Yamada, Y.; Sakata, A. An Analysis Method of Antiferromagnetic Powder Patterns in Spin-Echo NMR under External Fields. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.; 1986; 55, pp. 1751-1758. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.55.1751]