It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
La Palma, Canary Islands, underwent volcanic unrest which culminated in its largest historical eruption. We study this unrest along 2021 using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and a new improved interpretation methodology, comparing achieved results with the crustal structure. We reproduce the final phase of La Palma volcanic unrest, highligthing a shallow magma accumulation which begins about 3.5 months before the eruption in a crustal volume charactherized by low density and fractured rocks. Our modeling, together with our improved pictures of the crustal structure, allows us to explain the location and characteristics of the eruption and to detect failed eruption paths. These can be used to explain post-eruptive phenomena and hazards to the local population, such as detected gases anomalies in La Bombilla and Puerto Naos. Our results have implications for understanding volcanic activity in the Canaries and volcano monitoring elsewhere, helping to support decision-making and providing significant insights into urban and infrastructure planning in volcanic areas.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Ciudad Universitaria, Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM). Calle del Doctor Severo Ochoa, nº 7, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.473617.0)
2 Osservatorio Etneo - Sezione di Catania, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Catania, Italy (GRID:grid.470198.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1755 400X)
3 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ETS de Ingenieros en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.5690.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 2978)
4 Dares Technology, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5690.a); Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Also at CommSensLab, Dep. Signal Theory and Communications, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.6835.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 028X); Ciudad Universitaria, Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM). Calle del Doctor Severo Ochoa, nº 7, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.473617.0)
5 Natural Resources Canada, Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, Ottawa, Canada (GRID:grid.202033.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2295 5236)
6 216UCB, University of Colorado at Boulder, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.266190.a) (ISNI:0000000096214564)
7 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Fac. CC. Geológicas, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)