Expansion of CD8+ T cell population in Lassa virus survivors with low T cell precursor frequency reveals durable immune response in most survivors

Abstract

Introduction

Lassa virus is a priority pathogen for vaccine research and development, however the duration of cellular immunity and protection in Lassa fever (LF) survivors remains unclear.

Methods

We investigated Lassa virus specific CD8+ T cell responses in 93 LF survivors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from these individuals were infected with recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus encoding Lassa virus antigens and virus specific T cell responses were measured after 18-hour incubation. Participants who had undetectable CD8+ T cell response underwent further analysis using a 10-day T cell proliferation assays to evaluate for low T cell precursor frequency.

Results

Forty-five of the 93 LF survivors did not have a Lassa virus specific CD8+ T cell response. Of those with responses and a known date of onset of LF (N = 11), 9 had LF within the last ten years. Most participants without a measurable CD8+ T cell response were more than 10 years removed from a clinical history of LF (N = 14/16). Fourteen of 21 patients (67%) with undetectable CD8+ T cell response had a measurable Lassa virus specific CD8+ T cell response with the 10-day assay.

Discussion

Despite reports of strong CD8+ T cell responses during acute Lassa virus infection, circulating Lassa virus-specific CD8+ T cells declined to undetectable levels in most Lassa fever survivors after ten years when evaluated with an 18-hour T cell stimulation. However, when Lassa virus-specific T cells were expanded prior to restimulation, a Lassa virus-specific CD8+ T cell response could be detected in many if the samples that were negative in the 18-hour stimulation assay, suggesting that prolonged cellular immunity does exist in Lassa fever survivors at low frequencies.

Introduction

Lassa virus (LASV) is estimated to infect several thousand individuals across West Africa each year [1–4] resulting in many cases of Lassa fever (LF), a febrile disease associated with high morbidity and significant mortality [5,6]. Hospitalized cases of LF are a small percentage of total cases of LASV infection, but the lack of approved vaccines or interventions other than supportive therapy contribute to high fatality rates of around 20% in hospitalized patients [7–12]. The high case fatality rate in hospitalized patients and lack of prophylactic or preventative therapies have led to the categorization of LF by World Health Organization as a high priority disease for vaccine research and development [13].

Several studies have documented a seroprevalence of LASV within Western Africa that is much higher than the reported cases of LF [14,15], suggesting that a large number of LASV infections are asymptomatic, which may reflect that the immune response can control infection and prevent severe disease in most infected individuals. Evidence indicates that protective immune responses against lethal doses of LASV in non-human primates (NHPs) are likely primarily cell mediated [16,17], which has important implications for vaccine development. Thus, an early and robust CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in LASV infected NHPs is associated with survival, whereas in NHPs that succumb to LASV infection, T cell responses are delayed and weak [14,16–19].

Studies of LF survivors have documented robust T cell responses during and shortly following LASV infection [20–22]. However, the durability of LASV immunity in infected individuals remain poorly characterized. LASV-specific IgG antibodies have been identified in people up to 40 years after their initial exposure to LASV [23]. Robust CD8+ T cell responses were detected for up to nearly two months following acute LASV infection in a patient cared for in the United States [22], but there is very limited knowledge about the long term cellular immune response to LASV in humans. To fill this knowledge gap, we sought to evaluate the durability of LASV specific T cell responses in a cohort of LF survivors.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was reviewed and approved by both Scripps Research and Tulane University Human Research Protection Program, and the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee. Research was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects provided written consent.

Study site and participants

Kenema Government Hospital (KGH) in Kenema, Sierra Leone was the site of our study, and is the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Government of Sierra Leone referral hospital for Kenema District. Participants were enrolled in a Lassa Survivor Cohort if they had previously been diagnosed with LF and hospitalized at KGH.

Recombinant single cycle infectious vesicular stomatitis virus (rscVSV) preparation and T cell assays

We evaluated LASV-specific T cell responses by using recombinant single-cycle infectious vesicular stomatitis virus (rscVSVs) encoding either LASV nucleoprotein (NP), glycoprotein 1 (GP1), or glycoprotein 2 (GP2) constructed from the Josiah strain, as well as enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) as a negative control. This method has been used by us and others to identify virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to several pathogens [20,21,24–26]. Blood was collected at KGH, PBMCs were isolated, and stored at -80°C as previously described [24,25]. For T cell stimulation and quantification of LASV specific T cell responses, 18-hour and 10-day stimulation assays were completed. For the 18-hour assays, PBMC’s from LF survivors were infected with rscVSVs encoding full length LASV proteins NP, GP1, GP2, and sspGP2, at an MOI of 15. As a negative control, PBMCs were infected with rscVSV encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP), and unstimulated cells were also evaluated. Cells were incubated with anti-human CD3 (60 μg/mL) and CD28 (20 μg/mL) antibodies (BioXcel, New Haven CT) as a positive control. PBMCs were incubated at 37°C/5% CO2, Brefeldin A (4 μg/mL) was added after 4 hours, then cells continued incubation overnight. Cells were subsequently stained with FITC-conjugated anti-human CD3 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-human CD4 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), and PE-conjugated anti-human CD8 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) antibodies at a dilution of 1:200 for 1 hour at 4°C. Cells were washed twice with FACS buffer (PBS containing 2% fetal bovine serum), then fixed with BD Cytofix buffer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 20 minutes at 4°C. After fixation, cells were washed twice with BD Perm/Wash buffer, then stained with PECy7- conjugated anti-human IFN-γ (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and APC-conjugated anti-human TNF-α (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) antibodies diluted in BD Perm/Wash buffer for 1 hour, at 4°C. Cells were washed with BD Perm/Wash buffer twice, and suspended in FACS buffer in preparation for flow cytometry analysis. LSR II (Beckton Dickenson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was used for flow cytometry data collection, and data was analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Woodburn, OR). The flow cytometry gating strategy included live lymphocytes, single cells, CD3+ cells, CD8+ or CD4+ cells, and proliferated cells in the analysis (S1 Fig). Cells were considered activated and with a positive response if the T cells were positive for both IFN-γ and TNF-α at 1.2log10 greater than the base population of T cells.

For the 10-day assay, PBMCs from LF survivors were incubated at 37°C with cell trace violet at a concentration of 1 uL per 4x106 cells for 20 minutes, resuspended in RPMI and plated in a 96-well plate. Cells were then infected (MOI = 10) with rscVSVs encoding full length LASV proteins NP, GP1, GP2, and sspGP2, or GFP as a negative control. Positive controls were obtained as in the 18-hour assay, as described above. IL2 and IL15 (PeproTech Inc, East Windsor, NJ) were added to the PBMCs, each at a concentration of 0.02 ng/uL. PBMCs were incubated for 9 days at 37°C/5% CO2. On day 9 post infection, PBMCs were reinfected (MOI = 15) with rscVSVs, incubated for 4 hours at 37°C, and brefeldin A was added at a concentration of 4 μg /mL. PBMCs were incubated overnight at 37°C. Cells were then stained and prepared as in the 18-hour assay, as described above. In the tetramer assays, APC-conjugated tetramer was also used (HLA-A*02:01, NIH Tetramer Core Facility).

Anti-LASV GP and anti-LASV NP antibody ELISAs

IgG seropositivity was assayed with pan-LASV NP and GP IgG ELISA plates (Zalgen Labs, Germantown, MD) which were prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, samples and provided negative controls were diluted 1:100 in sample diluent. For both NP and GP ELISAs, a 6-point reference curve using 3-fold serial dilutions was prepared using provided calibrators. All controls and samples were plated in duplicate and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Following the 30-minute incubation, plates were washed using a 5-wash program (Biotek, 405Select) in provided ELISA wash buffer. Plates were incubated with IgG anti-human HRP-conjugated antibody solution for 30 minutes, followed by another washing step in ELISA wash buffer. The one-component substrate (TMB) was then added, and plates were incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes before the addition of the provided stop solution. Plates were read at 450 nm (Biotek, Synergy H1) and were considered positive if the resultant calculated concentration was above 1.65mg/mL (sensitivity: 92.6%, specificity: 95.2%) and 3.04mg/mL (sensitivity: 61.5%, specificity: 95.2%) for NP and GP IgG, respectively. Negative cutoffs were determined using an ROC analysis with a panel of sera from 122 known LF survivors and 130 individuals from a LASV non-endemic region in South America. LASV-IgG data was analyzed using 4-parameter logistic regression in Graphpad/PRISM version 9 (Carlsbad, CA). P values were calculated with one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using Graph Pad Prism software.

Plaque reduction neutralization tests

One hundred plaque forming units of low-passage LASV, Josiah strain, was incubated for 60 minutes with serial dilutions of patient sera to assess for neutralizing activity in Earle’s Minimal Essential Medium, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1x glutamax with 10% guinea pig complement (Rockland, Limerick, PA). After incubation, sera-LASV mixture were plaque-assayed to measure residual infectivity. Vero 76 cells were inoculated with sera for 60 minutes, inoculum was then removed, and an agar medium was placed on the cells. The cells were then incubated for 6 days, then stained with neutral red for 24 hours. Plaques were measured and a 4-parameter logistic regression analysis was used to determine titers.

Results

LASV-specific CD8+ T cell responses using 18-hour assay

We have documented the identification of LASV-specific T cell epitopes by incubating PBMCs from LF survivors overnight with rscVSVs encoding LASV antigens [20,21]. We expanded this previous work to 93 LASV survivors and evaluated their CD8+ T cell responses to LASV antigens by stimulating PBMCs with rscVSVs encoding LASV NP and GPC sequences. Despite success using this method for evaluating Ebolavirus specific T cells in long-term survivors of ebolavirus disease (EVD) [24,25], only 27% of long-term LF survivors had a measurable CD8+ T cell response (Fig 1A) using this method. We considered LF survivors as having a positive T cell response if the percentage of T cells coexpressing IFN-γ and TNF-α was higher than both unstimulated and rscVSV-eGFP stimulated negative controls. Responses were considered indeterminate if the LASV specific T cell response was present but background events in the negative controls and stimulated samples was high.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1.

A Rate of CD8+ T cell response to LASV antigens. N = 93, including all LF survivors (with and without known date of infection); Responses were considered indeterminate if the LASV specific T cell response was present but background events in the negative controls and stimulated samples was high. B CD8+ T cell responses to LASV specific antigens in overnight assays in those with known date of onset of LASV infection (total N = 36); C Rate of response of LASV to proliferation assay, that were non-responders to standard overnight stimulation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g001

We hypothesized that the inability to detect T cell responses in the majority of LF survivors was due to contraction of circulating LASV-specific T cells over time. However, unlike with EVD survivors, most LF survivors did not have well documented disease history due to poor record keeping during and just after the civil war in Sierra Leone. Consequently, the date of LASV infection onset was known for only 36 survivors, of which 31% had no CD8+ T cell response to overnight stimulation with LASV specific antigens (Fig 1B). Among LF survivors with positive T cell responses after overnight stimulation with rscVSVs, 81% had a date of LF onset within 10 years from the date of blood collection (N = 11). In contrast, onset of disease in survivors without a CD8+ T cell response was greater than 10 years in 87% of participants (N = 16) (p = 0.0008).

LASV-specific CD8+ T cell responses using 10-day assay

Our data suggested that LASV-specific T cells may decrease over time or that our overnight stimulation assay was not sensitive enough to detect low precursor frequency LASV-specific T cells. We consequently altered our assay to increase sensitivity to detect lower frequency virus-specific T cells in LF survivors with no measurable T cell response. This was accomplished by an initial stimulation with our rscVSVs for 9 days in the presence of IL-2 and IL-15. We then performed an overnight restimulation with the homologous rscVSVs in the presence of brefeldin A and measured the expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α by flow cytometry.

The rscVSVs encoding LASV antigens used in this study have been described [20,21,24,27]. To avoid rescuing a replication competent VSV, we split the GP into GP1 (GPC: 1-279aa) and GP2 (GPC: 214–491) with an overlapping region to ensure that epitopes spanning this area would not be missed. Further, because the GP2 construct did not yield a stable protein, which might compromise detecting GP2-specific T cell responses, we rescued a rscVSV encoding a SSP-GP2 fusion protein (GPC: 1–59, 260–491) which was previously shown to be detected by Western blot [21]. In addition, we used a rscVSV encoding eGFP as a negative control. We did not include LASV Z and L proteins in our studies because compelling evidence indicates that most of the dominant T cell responses against mammarenaviruses recognize NP and GPC-specific epitopes [28–32].

Initially, 93 LF survivors were analyzed for LASV specific CD8+ T cell responses with an 18-hour stimulation assay, and 45 did not respond [20,21]. Participant characteristics for all 93 survivors is shown in Table 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Participant characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.t001

We had enough sample to complete T-cell proliferation assays in 21 of these 45 non-responders. Twenty-one survivors who had no CD8+ T cell response to overnight stimulation with LASV specific antigens were subsequently stimulated using this 10-day proliferation and restimulation assay. Of the 21 participants, 43% were female (Table 2). Participants’ age range was 18–55 years, with similar mean ages in those with and without T cell responses following expansion and stimulation. Individuals without a T cell response had an older onset of LF disease than those with T cell responses (Table 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Participant characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.t002

CD8+ T cell responses were measured by co-expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α. Fourteen of the 21 survivors (67%) who had no CD8+ T cell response to the overnight stimulation assay had a IFN-γ +TNF-α+ CD8+ T cell response to the 10-day expansion and stimulation assay (645510, 5666460, 5976610, 4073990, 0017480, 7730880, 3298240, 0191930, 6578150, 3346490, 9075190, 8494660, 2553850, 7274040) (Fig 1C). An example of a LF survivor (5976610) without a response to the overnight assay and with a response to the 10-day proliferation assay is shown in Fig 2. Six of the 21 LF survivors examined had significantly higher T cell responses to LASV antigens when compared to the negative unstimulated or GFP controls (Fig 3). When compared to negative unstimulated and GFP controls, four survivors (2553850, 5666460, 4073990, 7730880) had significantly higher CD8+T cell response to LASV GP2 antigen, two survivors had significantly higher response to sspGP2 (4073990, 7274040), and two survivors had significantly higher GP1 response (645510, 7274040) (Fig 3). Four survivors had a good T cell response, but there were too few replicates to calculate statistical significance (5976610, 6578150, 9075190, 8494660). Four survivors had a trend towards increased CD8+ T cell responses to expansion and stimulation, but differences did not reach statistical significance (0017480, 0191930, 3346490, 2553850).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2.

(i) A LF survivor with a negative LASV-specific T cell response to overnight stimulation with different antigens, as denoted above each plot. The same survivor’s proliferated CD8+ T cells (ii) have a positive LASV-specific response (iii) to a prolonged stimulation 10-day proliferation assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Individual LF survivors’ CD8+ T cell response, measured by percentage of T cells expressing IFN-γ alone, TNF-α alone, or both IFN-γ and TNF-α, when stimulated by LASV antigens and negative controls (negative controls include no stimulation and GFP).

Asterisk on individual plots indicates the 14 LASV survivors with positive IFN-γ+ TNF-α+ CD8 T cell response. 3 replicates were performed for 645510, 5666460, 4073990, 7822270, 0017480, 7730880, 3298240, 0191930, 2549260, 3346490, 4232430, 6197110, 3451660, 2553850, 7274040. Due to limited sample, 2 replicates were performed for 0279070, 9075190, 6578150 and 8494660 and 1 replicate was performed for 5976610 and 7703890.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g003

Single cytokine analysis was also done evaluating CD8+IFN-γ+ and CD8+TNF-α+ cells (Fig 3), following expansion and stimulation with LASV antigens. IFN-γ levels were statistically higher than negative controls in 5666460, 4073990, 3298240, and 0191930 when stimulated with GP2; 4073990 when stimulated with sspGP2; and 645510, 4073990, 7730880, and 5666460 when stimulated with GP1 (Fig 3). TNF-α levels were statistically higher than unstimulated controls in 5666460, 4073990, and 7730880 when stimulated with GP2; 4073990 and 6197110 when stimulated with sspGP2; 645510, 4073990 and 6197110 when stimulated with GP1; 3298240, 4073990, 3298240, and 6197110 when stimulated with NP (Fig 3).

Most survivors showed a response to GP2 (10 of the 14 responders), next to NP or sspGP2 (6 of the 14 responders each), then GP1 (4 of the 14 responders) (Fig 4A). Four of the survivors with CD8 T cell response had a response to NP and GPC antigens, two had a response to NP alone, and eight had a response to GPC alone (Fig 4B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4.

A Frequency of CD8+ T cell response to individual LASV antigens in LF survivors, excluding those that did not respond to the proliferation assay. B Frequency of CD8+ T cell response to either NP + GP, NP alone or GP alone, excluding non-responders.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g004

We also evaluated CD4+ T cell responses among the 21 LF survivors who had no response to the overnight T cell assays. Of these, four (3298240, 191930, 4232430, and 3451660) had a significantly higher IFNg+TNFa+CD4+ T cell response than negative unstimulated or GFP stimulated controls (S2 Fig). Participant 3298240 had CD4+ T cell responses to the GP2 antigen that were significantly higher than the control (p = 0.03). Participant 0191930 showed significantly higher responses to NP and GP2 antigens than the controls (p = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively). 4232430 and 3451660 both had significantly higher responses to NP and sspGP2 than controls (S2 Fig).

GPC tetramer stain and 10-day proliferation assay

Because we had determined the HLA haplotypes of all our participants, we were able to selectively interrogate LASV peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses in an individual harboring HLA A*02:01 allele [20,33]. As this survivor had a positive LASV-specific CD8+ response to the 18-hour T cell assay, we were able to use LASV GPC60-68 and GPC441-449 A*02:01 tetramers to evaluate the specificity of our results. We observed high levels of CD8+/Tetramer+/ IFN-γ+ cells, when compared to unstimulated and GFP stimulated controls (Fig 5). Similar findings were observed in GP1 stimulated or peptide stimulated cells.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. LF survivor’s CD8+ T cell responses to i) expansion and ii) stimulation, as denoted at the top of individual plots.

On day 0, cells were expanded with either vsvGP2, vsvGP1, GPC441-449, or GPC60-68 peptides. Cells were then stimulated on day 9 with either GPC441-449 or GPC60-68 peptides. As a negative control, rscVSV-GFP was also used to expand and stimulate PBMCs. Staining included the GPC tetramer specific for the homologous peptide stimulation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g005

LASV anti-GP and anti-NP antibody levels

We sought to correlate T cell responses with LASV glycoprotein (GP) and nucleoprotein (NP) antibody levels. Of the 21 LF survivors with 10-day T cell assays completed, 16 had sera available for ELISA antibody testing. Fourteen samples had anti-GP antibody titers above the cutoff value (3.05). The mean anti-GP antibody value was 11.0 in LF survivors who had LASV specific CD8+ T cell responses, compared to 6.9 in those without a response (Fig 6A). Conversely, those with a LASV-specific CD8+ T cell response had a higher anti-NP response (mean = 35.6) vs those who had no T cell response (mean anti-NP = 29.7) (Fig 6B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6.

A Anti-GP and B anti-NP antibody levels in LF survivors with and without LASV-specific CD8+T cell responses on 10-day proliferation assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g006

We also found that LASV GP and NP antibodies (Fig 7A and 7B) and T cell responses to the proliferation assay (Fig 7C) decreased over time in LF survivors with known date of LASV disease onset.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 7.

A and B) LASV GP and NP IgG values decrease over time from infection (N = 10) C) LASV specific T cell responses to 10-day proliferation assay decrease over time from infection (N = 11).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g007

LASV neutralizing antibody titers

Next, we evaluated neutralizing antibody titers in the 21 LF survivors with 10-day T cell assays completed. We had enough sample to perform neutralization assays for 9 survivors. Those who had positive CD8 T cell responses had an average percent neutralization of 51% (N = 7, ranging 15%-90%), and those without CD8 T cell responses had an average percent neutralization of 68% (N = 2, 59–75%) (Fig 8).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 8. Percent LASV neutralization in LF survivors by years since LF infection.

N = 9 Data points depicted as square symbols represent LASV survivors without T cell responses in 10 day expansion assays (N = 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.g008

Discussion

Sierra Leonean LF survivors have low rates of CD8+ T cell response to LASV antigens when PBMCs were stimulated in an 18-hour assay. Higher LASV-specific CD8+ T cell response rates were seen when PBMCs were initially stimulated with LASV rscVSV and allowed to expand in 10-day proliferation assays, even in LF survivors who were infected with LASV over 20 years prior to the assay. These findings show that durable cellular immunity exists in many LF survivors, though with low antigen-specific precursor T cell frequencies. CD4+ T cell responses to LASV specific antigens were also higher than in unstimulated or GFP stimulated cell populations, however the response was not as robust as seen with CD8+ T cells. Some survivors had higher IFN-γ and TNF-α levels measured in both CD8+ and CD4+ cell populations when compared to unstimulated or GFP stimulated cell populations, however higher background in single cytokine positive cells make it more difficult to accurately assess specificity of T cell activation compared to TNF-α+IFN-γ + T cells. One weakness of this study was that viability was not used, however we hoped that the use of GFP and unstimulated controls, as well as narrow gating strategies obviated the need for viability dye.

We found no correlation between anti-GP or anti-NP antibodies and LASV-specific CD8+ T cell responses. An outlier in the LF survivor group without CD8+ responses had a very high anti-NP response, which skewed the data in this small group and contributed to the absence of statistically significant differences, which reflected a major limitation in this study, namely the small size of PBMC samples available to us at the time of this study.

Though robust T cell responses have been observed during, and shortly after, LF, there is very limited information about the durability of LASV-specific T cell responses. Here we have shown LASV-specific T cell responses in LF survivors whose documented infections occurred twenty years prior. One limitation of our study is the inability to assess how often LF survivors are exposed to LASV. While repeated exposures could strengthen T cell responses over time, we observed a decrease in precursor frequency of T cell responses after approximately ten years. These data suggest that re-exposure is probably an uncommon occurrence in LF survivors.

Neutralizing antibody levels are not seen until several months after infection [1,34,35]. Little is known about the human T cell responses save a single case of non-fatal severe Lassa fever where robust T cell responses were observed early during symptomatic infection and remained robust for several weeks [22]. This observation is consistent with non-human primate studies of Lassa fever demonstrating that fatal Lassa fever was associated with poor or delayed T cell responses. Taken together, the absence of neutralizing antibodies at the time of viral clearance suggests that CTLs may play a stronger role during acute infection while neutralizing antibodies may contribute to long term immunity.

Survivors are thought to be protected against disease but not against reinfection [36]. Observations of anti-LASV antibodies over several decades and the long-term presence of LASV-specific T cells observed here suggest both may play a role in protection upon reinfection [23]. Even low precursor frequency of LASV-specific T cell responses may be amplified to respond and provide protection against recurrence of LF on re-exposure to the virus. Thus, engineering vaccine responses to induce similar durable protection may be an effective strategy for prevention of LF. A similar decline in cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses that are robust with expansion have been observed with other viruses, including the measles virus [37–39]. The durability of T cell responses, especially to GP2, provide evidence that inclusion of GPC in vaccines designed to protect against LF may provide significant T cell immunity in addition to eliciting neutralizing antibody responses.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Flowjo gating scheme.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Individual LF survivors’ CD4+ T cell response, measured by percentage of T cells expressing IFN-γ alone, TNF-α alone, or both IFN-γ and TNF-α, when stimulated by LASV antigens and negative controls (negative controls include no stimulation and GFP).

3 replicates were performed for each sample.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants of the study who generously shared their time for the purpose of research, the Sierra Leonean government for allowing us to conduct this research, and the staff of KGH. We acknowledge and thank Celia Glezer for her assistance with the neutralization assays. We would also like to thank Simbirie Jalloh for her management of the Lassa Fever program, and Francis Baimba for performing phlebotomy.

Citation: LaVergne SM, Sakabe S, Momoh M, Kanneh L, Bond N, Garry RF, et al. (2022) Expansion of CD8+ T cell population in Lassa virus survivors with low T cell precursor frequency reveals durable immune response in most survivors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 16(11): e0010882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010882

References

1. McCormick JB, Fisher-Hoch SP. Lassa Fever. In: Oldstone MBA, editor. Arenaviruses I: The Epidemiology, Molecular and Cell Biology of Arenaviruses [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002 [cited 2021 Jan 12]. p. 75–109. (Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56029-3_4

2. Sogoba N, Rosenke K, Adjemian J, Diawara SI, Maiga O, Keita M, et al. Lassa Virus Seroprevalence in Sibirilia Commune, Bougouni District, Southern Mali. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;22(4):657–63. pmid:26981786

3. Ogbu O, Ajuluchukwu E, Uneke CJ. Lassa fever in West African sub-region: an overview. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007 Mar;44(1):1–11. pmid:17378212

4. Safronetz D, Sogoba N, Diawara SI, Bane S, Rosenke K, Maiga O, et al. Annual Incidence of Lassa Virus Infection in Southern Mali. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Apr 5;96(4):944–6. pmid:28093544

5. Ogbu O, Ajuluchukwu E, Uneke CJ. Lassa fever in West African sub-region: an overview. 2007;11.

6. Lassa Fever—Nigeria [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/lassa-fever—nigeria

7. Mateer EJ, Huang C, Shehu NY, Paessler S. Lassa fever–induced sensorineural hearing loss: A neglected public health and social burden. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2018 Feb 22 [cited 2021 Jan 12];12(2). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823363/ pmid:29470486

8. Cummins D, McCormick JB, Bennett D, Samba JA, Farrar B, Machin SJ, et al. Acute Sensorineural Deafness in Lassa Fever. JAMA. 1990 Oct 24;264(16):2093–6. pmid:2214077

9. Siddle KJ, Eromon P, Barnes KG, Mehta S, Oguzie JU, Odia I, et al. Genomic Analysis of Lassa Virus during an Increase in Cases in Nigeria in 2018. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov;379(18):1745–53. pmid:30332564

10. Kofman A, Choi MJ, Rollin PE. Lassa Fever in Travelers from West Africa, 1969–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;25(2):236–9. pmid:30666924

11. WHO | Lassa fever [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization; [cited 2022 Aug 11]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs179/en/

12. Ipadeola O, Furuse Y, Ilori EA, Dan-Nwafor CC, Akabike KO, Ahumibe A, et al. Epidemiology and case-control study of Lassa fever outbreak in Nigeria from 2018 to 2019. J Infect. 2020 May;80(5):578–606. pmid:31926184

13. Prioritizing diseases for research and development in emergency contexts [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/activities/prioritizing-diseases-for-research-and-development-in-emergency-contexts

14. Russier M, Pannetier D, Baize S. Immune Responses and Lassa Virus Infection. Viruses. 2012 Nov 5;4(11):2766–85. pmid:23202504

15. Kernéis S, Koivogui L, Magassouba N, Koulemou K, Lewis R, Aplogan A, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Lassa Seropositivity in Inhabitants of the Forest Region of Guinea: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Nov 17;3(11):e548. pmid:19924222

16. Geisbert TW, Jones S, Fritz EA, Shurtleff AC, Geisbert JB, Liebscher R, et al. Development of a New Vaccine for the Prevention of Lassa Fever. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2005 Jun [cited 2021 Jan 12];2(6). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1160587/ pmid:15971954

17. Fisher-Hoch SP, Hutwagner L, Brown B, McCormick JB. Effective Vaccine for Lassa Fever. J Virol. 2000 Aug 1;74(15):6777–83. pmid:10888616

18. Baize S, Marianneau P, Loth P, Reynard S, Journeaux A, Chevallier M, et al. Early and Strong Immune Responses Are Associated with Control of Viral Replication and Recovery in Lassa Virus-Infected Cynomolgus Monkeys. J Virol. 2009 Jun;83(11):5890–903. pmid:19297492

19. Mantlo E, Paessler S, Huang C. Differential Immune Responses to Hemorrhagic Fever-Causing Arenaviruses. Vaccines [Internet]. 2019 Oct 2 [cited 2021 Jan 12];7(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6963578/ pmid:31581720

20. Sakabe S, Hartnett JN, Ngo N, Goba A, Momoh M, Sandi JD, et al. Identification of Common CD8+ T Cell Epitopes from Lassa Fever Survivors in Nigeria and Sierra Leone. J Virol. 2020 Jun 1;94(12). pmid:32269122

21. Sullivan BM, Sakabe S, Hartnett JN, Ngo N, Goba A, Momoh M, et al. High crossreactivity of human T cell responses between Lassa virus lineages. PLoS Pathog [Internet]. 2020 Mar 6 [cited 2021 Feb 22];16(3). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080273/

22. McElroy AK, Akondy RS, Harmon JR, Ellebedy AH, Cannon D, Klena JD, et al. A Case of Human Lassa Virus Infection With Robust Acute T-Cell Activation and Long-Term Virus-Specific T-Cell Responses. J Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;215(12):1862–72. pmid:28863472

23. Bond N, Schieffelin JS, Moses LM, Bennett AJ, Bausch DG. A Historical Look at the First Reported Cases of Lassa Fever: IgG Antibodies 40 Years After Acute Infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Feb 6;88(2):241–4. pmid:23390223

24. Sakabe S, Sullivan BM, Hartnett JN, Robles-Sikisaka R, Gangavarapu K, Cubitt B, et al. Analysis of CD8 + T cell response during the 2013–2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018 Aug 7;115(32):E7578–86. pmid:30038008

25. LaVergne SM, Sakabe S, Kanneh L, Momoh M, Al-Hassan F, Yilah M, et al. Ebola-Specific CD8+ and CD4+ T-Cell Responses in Sierra Leonean Ebola Virus Survivors With or Without Post-Ebola Sequelae. J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 1;222(9):1488–97. pmid:32436943

26. Moseley NB, Laur O, Ibegbu CC, Loria GD, Ikwuenzunma G, Jayakar HR, et al. Use of replication restricted recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus vectors for detection of antigen-specific T cells. J Immunol Methods. 2012 Jan 31;375(1–2):118–28. pmid:22004852

27. Whitt MA. Generation of VSV Pseudotypes Using Recombinant ΔG-VSV for Studies on Virus Entry, Identification of Entry Inhibitors, and Immune Responses to Vaccines. J Virol Methods. 2010 Nov;169(2):365–74.

28. van der Most RG, Sette A, Oseroff C, Alexander J, Murali-Krishna K, Lau LL, et al. Analysis of cytotoxic T cell responses to dominant and subdominant epitopes during acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 1996 Dec 15;157(12):5543–54. pmid:8955205

29. Puglielli MT, Zajac AJ, Most RG van der, Dzuris JL, Sette A, Altman JD, et al. In Vivo Selection of a Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Variant That Affects Recognition of the GP33-43 Epitope by H-2Db but Not H-2Kb. J Virol [Internet]. 2001 Jun 1 [cited 2022 Jan 20]; Available from: https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/JVI.75.11.5099-5107.2001 pmid:11333891

30. van der Most RG, Murali-Krishna K, Lanier JG, Wherry EJ, Puglielli MT, Blattman JN, et al. Changing immunodominance patterns in antiviral CD8 T-cell responses after loss of epitope presentation or chronic antigenic stimulation. Virology. 2003 Oct 10;315(1):93–102. pmid:14592762

31. Whitton JL, Gebhard JR, Lewicki H, Tishon A, Oldstone MB. Molecular definition of a major cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope in the glycoprotein of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J Virol. 1988 Mar;62(3):687–95. pmid:2448497

32. The CD8+ T-Cell Response to Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Involves the L Antigen: Uncovering New Tricks for an Old Virus [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 20]. Available from: https://journals.asm.org/doi/epub/10.1128/JVI.02632-06

33. Botten J, Alexander J, Pasquetto V, Sidney J, Barrowman P, Ting J, et al. Identification of Protective Lassa Virus Epitopes That Are Restricted by HLA-A2. J Virol. 2006 Sep;80(17):8351–61. pmid:16912286

34. Robinson JE, Hastie KM, Cross RW, Yenni RE, Elliott DH, Rouelle JA, et al. Most neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies target novel epitopes requiring both Lassa virus glycoprotein subunits. Nat Commun. 2016 May 10;7(1):11544. pmid:27161536

35. Branco LM, Grove JN, Boisen ML, Shaffer JG, Goba A, Fullah M, et al. Emerging trends in Lassa fever: redefining the role of immunoglobulin M and inflammation in diagnosing acute infection. Virol J. 2011 Oct 24;8(1):478. pmid:22023795

36. Richmond JK, Baglole DJ. Lassa fever: epidemiology, clinical features, and social consequences. BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1271–5. pmid:14644972

37. Naniche D, Garenne M, Rae C, Manchester M, Buchta R, Brodine SK, et al. Decrease in Measles Virus-Specific CD4 T Cell Memory in Vaccinated Subjects. J Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;190(8):1387–95. pmid:15378430

38. Amanna IJ, Slifka MK, Crotty S. Immunity and immunological memory following smallpox vaccination. Immunol Rev. 2006 Jun;211:320–37. pmid:16824139

39. Hammarlund E, Thomas A, Poore EA, Amanna IJ, Rynko AE, Mori M, et al. Durability of Vaccine-Induced Immunity Against Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxins: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2016 May 1;62(9):1111–8. pmid:27060790