Abstract

Tight carbonate rocks are important hydrocarbon and potential geothermal reservoirs, for example, in CO2-Enhanced Geothermal Systems. We report a study of outcrop samples of tectonically undeformed tight carbonates from the upper Jurassic “Malm ß” formation in Southern Germany near the town of Simmelsdorf (38 km NE of Nuremberg) to understand bulk petrophysical properties in relation to microstructure and to compare models for permeability prediction in these samples. We applied Archimedes isopropanol immersion, Helium pycnometry, mercury injection, gamma density core logging, and gas permeability measurements, combined with microstructural investigations and liquid metal injection (LMI-BIB-SEM). In addition, ultrasonic velocity was measured to allow geomechanical comparison of stratigraphically equivalent rocks in the South German Molasse Basin (SGMB). Results show only small variations, showing that the formation is rather homogeneous with bulk porosities below 5% and argon permeabilities around 1.4E−17 m2. The presence of stylolites in some of the samples has neither a significant effect on porosity nor permeability. Pores are of submicron size with pore throats around 10 nm and connected as shown by Mercury injection and Liquid Metal injection. Samples have high dynamic Young’s Modulus of 73 ± 5 GPa as expected for lithified and diagenetically overmature limestones. Moreover, no trends in properties were observable toward the faults at meter scale, suggesting that faulting was post-diagenetic and that the matrix permeabilities were too low for intensive post-diagenetic fluid–rock interaction. Petrophysical properties are very close to those measured in the SGMB, illustrating the widespread homogeneity of these rocks and justifying the quarry as a reasonable reservoir analog. Permeability prediction models, such as the percolation theory-based Katz-Thompson Model, Poiseuille-based models, like the Winland, the Dastidar, the capillary tube, and the Kozeny-Carman Models, as well as several empirical models, namely, the Bohnsack, the Saki, and the GPPT Models, were applied. It is shown that the capillary tube Model and the Saki Model are best suited for permeability predictions from BIB-SEM and mercury injection capillary pressure results, respectively, providing a method to estimate permeability in the subsurface from drill cuttings. Matrix permeability is primarily controlled by the pore (throat) diameters rather than by the effective porosity.

Details

Title
Petrophysical characterization, BIB-SEM imaging, and permeability models of tight carbonates from the Upper Jurassic (Malm ß), SE Germany
Author
Freitag, Simon 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Klaver, Jop 2 ; Malai, Iulian S. 3 ; Klitzsch, Norbert 4 ; Urai, Janos L. 5 ; Stollhofen, Harald 1 ; Bauer, Wolfgang 1 ; Schmatz, Joyce 2 

 Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Erlangen, Germany (GRID:grid.5330.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 3311) 
 RWTH Aachen University, Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics, Aachen, Germany (GRID:grid.1957.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 696X); MaP-Microstructure and Pores GmbH, Aachen, Germany (GRID:grid.506466.7) 
 RWTH Aachen University, Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics, Aachen, Germany (GRID:grid.1957.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 696X); Shearwater GeoServices, Kent, UK (GRID:grid.1957.a) 
 RWTH Aachen University, Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy (E.ON Energy Research Center), Aachen, Germany (GRID:grid.1957.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 696X) 
 RWTH Aachen University, Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics, Aachen, Germany (GRID:grid.1957.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 696X); GeoStructures Consultancy for Structural Geology and Geomechanics, Maastricht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.1957.a) 
Pages
30
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Dec 2022
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
e-ISSN
21959706
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2755374142
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.