Convolution Error Reduction for a Fabry–Pérot-Based Linewidth Measurement: A Theoretical and Experimental Study

Abstract

Linewidth measurement of a short pulse single-longitudinal mode laser with a low repetition rate has been a big challenge. Although the Fabry–Pérot (FP) etalon in combination with a beam profiler is an effective approach to measure the linewidth, the convolution error introduced by the inherent transmission spectrum width of an FP restricts the measurement accuracy. Here, the source of convolutional errors of the FP etalon-based linewidth measurement is analyzed, and the convolutional fitting method is proposed to reduce the errors. The results show that the linewidth measurement using the FP cavity with low reflectance (95%) can achieve the same resolution as that with high reflectance (99.5%) based on this convolution error reduction method. The study provides a simple approach to accurately measuring the linewidth of pulsed lasers, even with low energy.

1. Introduction

As one of the most important parameters of lasers, linewidth has a bearing on how and where different laser sources can be applied [1,2,3,4,5]. Although the linewidth does not play a critical role in some fields dominated by power and wavelength, lasers with narrow linewidth are necessary for the applications, such as high-resolution spectroscopy and coherent optical communication [6,7,8,9,10]. At present, the primary methods to measure laser linewidth include optical spectrometer, beat frequency method [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], Fabry-Pérot (FP) scanning interferometer [18,19], and FP etalon combined with a camera-based beam profiler (CBP) [20,21,22,23]. For continuous or quasi-continuous lasers, the spectrometer method, beat frequency method, and FP interferometer can measure the laser linewidth effectively. However, in the case of lasers with a low repetition rate and short-pulse duration, these methods are difficult to increase the sampling rate [24,25,26,27,28]. The FP etalon combined with CBP to measure the laser linewidth does not have a strict requirement for the repetition rate of laser and is, therefore, well suited for the linewidth measurement of pulsed lasers.

Although algorithms such as pixel rotation can eliminate errors caused by pixel size, there are still some inaccuracies associated with the linewidth measurement results due to the presence of transmission spectrum width (TSW) [29,30]. The interference spectrum characterized by the interference circle is supposed to be the convolution of the intrinsic laser spectrum and the transmission spectrum of FP etalon, and the resulting error is the convolution error. The higher the reflectivity of FP, the more accurate the linewidth measurement results, but the high reflectivity etalon has a high insertion loss, so only low-reflectivity etalon can be used for low-power lasers. Hence, it is particularly important to find a way to reduce the convolution error that is critical to improving the practicality of line width measurement [30,31].

In this paper, we have proposed an algorithm for convolution error reduction of FP etalon-based laser linewidth measurement. First, the interference circle of the laser was measured using different reflectance FP etalon, and the interference linewidths were determined by Gaussian fitting. Then, the sources of convolution errors and their effects on linewidth results were analyzed. Finally, the convolution error is significantly reduced by the convolutional fitting method, which can improve the measurement accuracy. This work is of significant importance to accurately measure the linewidth of low-power laser using low-reflectivity etalons.

2. Experimental Setup and Gaussian Fit

The experimental setup based on the principle of equal inclination interference is shown in Figure 1. The laser to be measured is a passively Q-switched single-longitudinal-mode laser producing an output pulse width of 10 ns and repetition rate of 10 Hz [32,33,34], which has an output energy of ~10 mJ. The longitudinal-mode interval of the cavity is 3 GHz, and the theoretical linewidth of the cavity model is 260.7 MHz. The lens f₁ is used for beam coupling; the interference phenomena occur at the focus of f₂; the free spectrum range of this etalon is 7.5 GHz; The CBP (DataRay WinCamd-LCM) has a resolution of 1024 × 1024 with a pixel size of 11 μm.

The interference circles generated by the FP etalon with 95% and 99.5% reflectivity are shown in Figure 2a,c, respectively, which will be further processed by computer. One row of data extracted from a straight line through the center of the circle is drawn as a scatter plot as shown in Figure 2b,d.

The scatter plot in Figure 2 needs to be fitted with a Gaussian function to obtain the linewidths:

(1)$y=e^{\frac{-(\lambda -{\lambda }_0{)}^2}{2(\frac{{\displaystyle \Gamma }}{2\sqrt{2\ln 2}}{)}^2}}$

where ${\lambda }_0$ is the central wavelength, and ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$ is the full width at half maxima (FWHM) of curves. Since the fitting of Equation (1) is wavelength-fitting, it is necessary to change the abscissa of Figure 2b,d in order to obtain the linewidths. The interference phenomena occur when:

(2)$2nd·cos\theta =m\lambda ,$

where $n$ is the refractive index of the FP etalon substrate, $d$ is the distance of the FP etalon, and $\theta$ is the refraction angle of the incident light. We find that $\lambda$ is linearly related to $cos\theta$ and not linearly related to the number of pixels, so the FWHM obtained by its fit is not the linewidth of the laser. The abscissa of the scatter plot in Figure 2 is linearly processed as shown in Figure 3.

We transformed the abscissa of the scatter plot in Figure 3 into relative wavelength based on Equation (3) and the results are shown in Figure 4a,b.

(3)${\lambda }_r=\frac{cos\theta ·FSR}{space},$

where ${\lambda }_r$ is the relative wavelength, $FSR$ is the free spectral range of the FP etalon, and $space$ is the distance between the two peaks in Figure 3. We chose one peak and translated its abscissa to characterize the spectrum of the laser, a Gaussian fit was further used to determine the linewidth (as shown in Figure 4c,d). As each pulse of the pulsed laser is generated independently, there may be a slight difference between the linewidths of each pulse. We, therefore, took multiple interferometric images and repeated the above steps several times, using the average value to characterize the linewidth of the laser. Taking measure errors into account, the measurement results are $255.4 \pm 3.5 \mathrm{MHz}$ and $169.2 \pm 3.2 \mathrm{MHz}, \mathrm{respectively}$.

3. Analysis and Reduction of Convolution Error

It can be observed that there is a significant difference in the linewidth values measured by FP etalon with different reflectance, which is because the interference spectrum measured by FP etalon is not the intrinsic laser spectrum, but the convolution of the transmission spectrum of FP etalon and the intrinsic laser spectrum [30,35]. The transmission spectrum of FP etalon can be expressed by the Airy function [35], and the interference spectrum extracted from the interferogram should be expressed as:

(4)$I_{out}\left(\lambda \right)={{\displaystyle \int }}_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{e}^{\frac{-(\lambda -{\lambda }_0{)}^2}{2(\frac{{\displaystyle \Gamma }}{2\sqrt{2\ln 2}}{)}^2}}·\frac{1}{1+\frac{4R}{{\left(1-R\right)}^2}si{n}^2\left(\frac{2\pi nd}{\lambda -\tau }\right)}d\tau ,$

where $R$ is the reflectance of FP etalon, and the right-hand side of the integral is the Airy function. The TSW of Airy function can be expressed as [30]:

(5)${{\displaystyle \Gamma }}_{Aily}=\frac{c\left(1-R\right)}{2\pi nd{\sqrt{R}}^{\prime }}$

where ${{\displaystyle \Gamma }}_{Aily}$ is the TSW of FP etalon. The corresponding transmission spectrum of FP etalon with different reflectivity is shown as the green curve in Figure 5. We took a Gaussian function with a stationary linewidth to act as the intrinsic laser spectrum and convolve it with the Airy functions corresponding to different reflectance based on Equation (4), and the convolution results are shown as the blue dotted line in Figure 5. It can be observed that as the reflectance increases, the TSW progressively becomes narrower and convolution spectrum gradually approaches the intrinsic spectrum, which is the reason why the FWHM in Figure 4c is wider than the FWHM in Figure 4d. When the TSW of FP etalon is narrow enough, the transmission spectrum can be considered as an impulse function. Due to the nature of convolution: the convolution of any function with an impulse function is still the function itself, concluding that the higher the reflectance of the FP, the closer the interference spectrum is to the intrinsic spectrum and the more accurate the measured linewidth values.

The convolutional fitting method uses Equation (4) to fit the interference data. The results of the convolution fitting and Gaussian fitting are shown in Figure 6 and Table 1 (all results are calculated several times from different interferometric images). From Figure 6, we can observe that the profiles of the Gaussian fitting and the convolution fitting are extremely close in Figure 6b, while there is a slight difference between the fitted curves in Figure 6a. This also verifies that the higher the reflectivity of FP etalon, the more accurate the measured linewidth will be. We proposed the residuals to indicate the accuracy of the fitting:

(6)$Residual={{\displaystyle \sum }}_{i=1}^N\left[f\left({\lambda }_i\right)-g\left({\lambda }_i\right)\right],$

where $f\left({\lambda }_i\right)$ is the fitted value, $g\left({\lambda }_i\right)$ is the actual value of the spectrum scatter plot in Figure 6, and $N$ is the number of scatter points used for the fitting. From Table 1, we can observe that the convolutional fitting is better than the Gaussian fitting, hence the results from the convolutional fitting are more accurate. We found that the linewidth values measured by different reflectivity etalon are only 3.8 MHz different after convolutional fitting. We believe that the global error should be the combination of the intrinsic error due to the TSW and the measurement error characterized by the standard deviation. Hence, the measured linewidth is $255.4 \pm 125.5 \mathrm{MHz}$ using an FP etalon with 95% reflectivity without any error reduction, and can be considered as $165.9 \pm 10.8 \mathrm{MHz}$ after error reduction by a convolutional fitting method (measure errors are integrated into all results). It can be concluded that the convolutional fitting method significantly improves the accuracy of linewidth measurement.

In order to verify the applicability of the proposed method at low-power lasers, we used a half-wave plate combined with a polarizer to form an energy attenuation device to make the single pulse energy of the laser less than 1mj and measured the output linewidth in this case, the results are shown in Figure 7. Due to the weakness of the incident light, high-reflective etalons are no longer suitable and in such a situation only low-reflective etalons can be used. As can be seen in Figure 7a, even though a low-reflectivity etalon is used, the interference rings are very difficult to capture. The linewidth measured in this case is $159.9 \pm 6.9 \mathrm{MHz}$. As can be seen in Figure 7b, there is some stray light in the measured interferometric data due to the weak incident light, making the standard deviation of the measurement large, but the average measured linewidth is in the error tolerance range compared to the results in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a study of laser linewidth measurement based on the FP etalon was carried out for the problem of difficulty in measuring the linewidth of a short pulse (nanosecond level) laser with a low repetition rate. We have measured the interference circle of laser using different reflectance FP etalon in combination with a CBP. The image information in the interference circle was converted into spectrum information by coordinate variation, and then the interference linewidth was obtained by Gaussian fitting. The sources of convolution errors and their effects on linewidth measurement results were analyzed and the convolutional fitting method was proposed to reduce the errors. It is concluded that the convolutional fitting method can significantly reduce the convolution error of linewidth results.

Author Contributions

Data curation, X.H. and J.W.; Formal analysis, X.H. and B.C.; Investigation, X.H. and Z.B.; visualization, X.H; Writing—original draft, X.H.; Conceptualization, X.H., Z.B. and Z.L.; Methodology, Z.B., Y.W. and Z.L. Writing—review editing, Z.B., Y.W. and C.C.; Supervision, Z.B. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Table

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used for measurement of the laser linewidth.

Figure 2. (a) Recorded Interference circle (R = 95%), (b) scatter plot of normalized pixel intensity (R = 95%), (c) recorded Interference circle (R = 99.5%), and (d) scatter plot of normalized pixel intensity (R = 99.5%).

Figure 3. (a) Scatter plot after linear processing of the abscissa in Figure 2 (R = 95%) and (b) scatter plot after linear processing of the abscissa in Figure 2 (R = 99.5%).

Figure 4. (a) Scatter plot of relative wavelengths (R = 95%), (b) scatter plot of relative wavelengths (R = 99.5%), (c) Gaussian fitting of scatter plot in (a), and (d) Gaussian fitting of scatter plot in (b).

Figure 5. Comparison of Gaussian function, Airy function, and their convolution results under different reflectance: (a) R = 10%, (b) R = 50%, (c) R = 95%, and (d) R = 99.5%.

Figure 6. (a) Convolutional fitting—Gaussian fitting (R = 95%) and (b) Convolutional fitting—Gaussian fitting (R = 99.5%).

Figure 7. (a) Interference circles at low power (R = 95%) and (b) interference data and convolutional fit results.

Table 1

Comparison of error reduction using etalon with different reflectance.

Reflectance	TSW	Linewidth of Gaussian Fitting (Γ1)	Residuals of Gaussian Fitting	Linewidth of Convolutional Fitting (Γ2)	Residuals of Convolutional Fitting	Difference(Γ1-Γ2)
R = 95%	122 MHz	$255.4 \pm 3.5$ MHz	0.0584 nm	$165.9 \pm 2.2$ MHz	0.0317 nm	89.5 MHz
R = 99.5%	9.6 MHz	$169.2 \pm 3.2$ MHz	0.01 nm	$162.1 \pm 4.8$ MHz	0.0092 nm	7.1 MHz

References

1. Fu, S.; Shi, W.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; Zhu, X.; Norwood, R.A.; Peyghambarian, N. Review of recent progress on single-frequency fiber lasers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B.; 2017; 34, pp. A49-A62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.34.000A49]

2. Yang, X.; Bai, Z.; Chen, D.; Chen, W.; Yan, F.; Richard, P.M. Widely-tunable single-frequency diamond Raman laser. Opt. Express; 2021; 29, pp. 29449-29457. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.435023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615054]

3. Zhao, Z.; Bai, Z.; Jin, D.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Yan, B.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Mildren, R.P. Narrow laser-linewidth measurement using short delay self-heterodyne interferometry. Opt. Express; 2022; 30, pp. 30600-30610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.455028] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36242160]

4. Peng, W.; Jin, P.; Li, F.; Su, J.; Lu, H.; Peng, K. A Review of the High-Power All-Solid-State Single-Frequency Continuous-Wave Laser. Micromachines; 2021; 12, 1426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12111426]

5. Chen, H.; Bai, Z.; Yang, X.; Ding, J.; Qi, Y.; Yan, B.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Mildren, R.M. Enhanced stimulated Brillouin scattering utilizing Raman conversion in diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett.; 2022; 120, 181103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0087092]

6. Bai, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Tian, M.; Jin, D.; Pang, Y.; Li, S.; Yan, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z. A comprehensive review on the development and applications of narrow-linewidth lasers. Microw. Opt. Techn. Lett.; 2022; 64, pp. 2244-2255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mop.33046]

7. Jin, D.; Bai, Z.; Lu, Z.; Fan, R.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Mildren, R.P. 22.5-W narrow-linewidth diamond Brillouin laser at 1064 nm. Opt. Lett.; 2022; 47, pp. 5360-5363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.471447]

8. Guan, H.; Novack, A.; Galfsky, T.; Ma, Y.; Fathololoumi, S.; Horth, A.; Huynh, N.T.; Roman, J.; Shi, R.; Caverley, M. et al. Widely-tunable, narrow-linewidth III-V/silicon hybrid external-cavity laser for coherent communication. Opt. Express; 2018; 26, pp. 7920-7933. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.007920]

9. Zhou, K.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, X.; Yang, C.; Li, C.; Zhou, E.; Xu, X.; Wong, K.Y.; Cheng, H.; Gan, J. et al. kHz-order linewidth controllable 1550 nm single-frequency fiber laser for coherent optical communication. Opt. Express; 2017; 25, pp. 19752-19759. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.019752]

10. Sheng, Q.; Ma, H.; Li, R.; Wang, M.; Shi, W.; Yao, J. Recent progress on narrow-linewidth crystalline bulk Raman lasers. Results Phys.; 2020; 17, 103073. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103073]

11. Arpita, S.R.; Pradeep, K.K. Brillouin-induced self-heterodyne method for low jitter measurement of laser linewidth. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B.; 2019; 36, pp. 3145-3150.

12. Gao, J.; Jiao, D.; Deng, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Zang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Liu, T.; Zhang, S. A Polarization-Insensitive Recirculating Delayed Self-Heterodyne Method for Sub-Kilohertz Laser Linewidth Measurement. Photonics; 2021; 8, 137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/photonics8050137]

13. Xue, M.; Zhao, J. Laser linewidth measurement based on long and short delay fiber combination. Opt. Express; 2021; 29, pp. 27118-27126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.428787] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34615133]

14. Huang, S.; Zhu, T.; Liu, M.; Huang, W. Precise measurement of ultra-narrow laser linewidths using the strong coherent envelope. Sci. Rep.-UK; 2017; 7, 41988. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41988] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28181506]

15. Wang, Z.; Ke, C.; Zhong, Y.; Xing, C.; Wang, H.; Yang, K.; Cui, S.; Liu, D. Ultra-narrow-linewidth measurement utilizing dual-parameter acquisition through partially coherent light interference. Opt. Express; 2020; 28, pp. 8484-8493. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.387398]

16. Bai, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Li, S.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z. Narrow-Linewidth Laser Linewidth Measurement Technology. Front. Phys.; 2021; 9, 768165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.768165]

17. Peng, Y. A Novel Scheme for Hundred-Hertz Linewidth Measurements with the Self-Heterodyne Method. Chin. Phys. Lett.; 2013; 30, 084208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/30/8/084208]

18. Gao, W.; Lu, Z.; He, W.; Dong, Y.; Hasi, W. Characteristics of amplified spectrum of a weak frequency-detuned signal in a Brillouin amplifier. Laser Part Beams; 2009; 2, pp. 465-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034609990164]

19. Xue, J.; Chen, W.; Pan, Y.; Shi, J.; Fang, Y.; Xie, H.; Xie, M.; Sun, L.; Su, B. Pulsed laser linewidth measurement using Fabry–Pérot scanning interferometer. Results Phys.; 2016; 6, pp. 698-703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.10.004]

20. Ma, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Huang, J.; Yao, Y.; Zhou, B.; Fang, Y.; Min, J.; Liang, K. Accurate measurement of high resolution spectrum obtained by F–P etalon and ICCD. Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O; 2014; 116, pp. 575-584. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-013-5736-3]

21. Yao, Y.; Niu, Q.; Liang, K. Measurement error analysis of Brillouin lidar system using F–P etalon and ICCD. Opt. Commun.; 2016; 375, pp. 58-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.04.065]

22. Huang, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, B.; Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Liang, K. Processing method of spectrum measurement using FP etalon and ICCD. Opt. Express; 2012; 20, pp. 18568-18578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.018568] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23038495]

23. Zhang, L.; Zhang, D.; Yang, Z.; Shi, J.; Liu, D.; Gong, W.; Fry, E.S. Experimental investigation on line width compression of stimulated Brillouin scattering in water. Appl. Phys. Lett.; 2011; 98, 221106. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3595338]

24. Toshihiko, T.; Kenichi, I.; Toshiharu, T. Linewidth Measurement of a Single Longitudinal Mode AlGaAs Laser with a Fabry-Perot Interferometer. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.; 1980; 19, pp. L725-L727.

25. Jakup, R.; Bostjan, B. Injection-locked range and linewidth measurements at different seed-laser linewidths using a Fabry–Pérot laser-diode. Opt. Quant. Electron.; 2018; 50, 502.

26. George, H.M.; Edward, I.M.; Craig, R.W. The national ignition facility. Opt. Eng.; 2004; 43, pp. 2841-2853.

27. John, D.L.; Peter, A.; Richard, L.B.; Glendinning, S.G.; Siegfried, H.G.; Steven, W.H.; Robert, L.K.; Otto, L.L.; Laurence, J.S. The physics basis for ignition using indirect-drive targets on the National Ignition Facility. Phys. Plasmas; 2004; 11, pp. 339-491.

28. Zheng, W.; Wei, X.; Zhu, Q.; Jing, F.; Hu, D.; Su, J.; Zheng, K.; Yuan, X.; Zhou, X.; Dai, W. et al. Laser performance of the SG-III laser facility. High Power Laser Sci.; 2016; 4, e21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hpl.2016.20]

29. Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Yao, Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Huang, J.; Min, J.; Liang, K. Experimental analysis on calibration of instrument broadening in a lidar system with Fabry–Perot etalon. J. Mod. Optic; 2013; 60, pp. 1967-1975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2013.868552]

30. Hun, X.; Bai, Z.; Chen, B.; Wang, J.; Cui, C.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z. Fabry–Pérot based short pulsed laser linewidth measurement with enhanced spectrum resolution. Results Phys.; 2022; 37, 105510. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105510]

31. Zhao, Z.; Bai, Z.; Jin, D.; Chen, X.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Yan, B.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Mildren, R.P. The Influence of Noise Floor on the Measurement of Laser Linewidth Using Short-Delay-Length Self-Heterodyne/Homodyne Techniques. Micromachines; 2022; 13, 1311. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081311]

32. Chen, B.; Bai, Z.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, B.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z. Compound Cavity Passively Q-Switched Single-Longitudinal-Mode Diode-Pumped Laser. Front. Phys.; 2022; 10, 820177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.820177]

33. Jin, D.; Bai, Z.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Fan, R.; Qi, Y.; Ding, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y. et al. Doubly Q-switched single longitudinal mode Nd:YAG laser with electro-optical modulator and Cr⁴⁺:YAG. Opt. Commun.; 2020; 463, 125500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.125500]

34. Xue, F.; Zhang, S.; Cong, Z.; Huang, Q.; Guan, G.; Wu, Q.; Chen, H.; Bai, F.; Liu, Z. Diode-end-pumped single-longitudinal-mode passively Q-switched Nd: GGG laser. Laser Phys. Lett.; 2018; 15, 035001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1612-202X/aa9b21]

35. Liang, K.; Ma, Y.; Huang, J.; Li, H.; Yu, Y. Precise measurement of Brillouin scattering spectrum in the ocean using F–P etalon and ICCD. Appl. Phys. B-Lasers O; 2011; 105, 421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4719-5]