Abstract

Background: The most used questionnaires for PTSD screening in adults were developed in English. Although many of these questionnaires were translated into other languages, the procedures used to translate them and to evaluate their reliability and validity have not been consistently documented. This comprehensive scoping review aimed to compile the currently available translated and evaluated questionnaires used for PTSD screening, and highlight important gaps in the literature.

Objective: This review aimed to map the availability of translated and evaluated screening questionnaires for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for adults.

Methods: All peer-reviewed studies in which a PTSD screening questionnaire for adults was translated, and which reported at least one result of a qualitative and /or quantitative evaluation procedure were included. The literature was searched using Embase, MEDLINE, and APA PsycInfo, citation searches and contributions from study team members. There were no restrictions regarding the target languages of the translations. Data on the translation procedure, the qualitative evaluation, the quantitative evaluation (dimensionality of the questionnaire, reliability, and performance), and open access were extracted.

Results: A total of 866 studies were screened, of which 126 were included. Collectively, 128 translations of 12 different questionnaires were found. Out of these, 105 (83.3%) studies used a forward and backward translation procedure, 120 (95.2%) assessed the reliability of the translated questionnaire, 60 (47.6%) the dimensionality, 49 (38.9%) the performance, and 42 (33.3%) used qualitative evaluation procedures. Thirty-four questionnaires (27.0%) were either freely available or accessible on request.

Conclusions: The analyses conducted and the description of the methods and results varied substantially, making a quality assessment impractical. Translations into languages spoken in middle- or low-income countries were underrepresented. In addition, only a small proportion of all translated questionnaires were available. Given the need for freely accessible translations, an online repository was developed.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • We mapped the availability of translated PTSD screening questionnaires.

  • The quality of the translation and validation processes is very heterogenous.

  • We created a repository for translated, validated PTSD screening questionnaires.

Details

Title
Mapping the availability of translated versions of posttraumatic stress disorder screening questionnaires for adults: A scoping review
Author
Hoffman, Joel 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Ben-Zion, Ziv 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Arévalo, Adrián 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Or Duek 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Greene, Talya 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Hall, Brian J 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Harpaz-Rotem, Ilan 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Liddell, Belinda 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Locher, Cosima 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Morina, Naser 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Nickerson, Angela 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Pfaltz, Monique C 7   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Schick, Matthis 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Schnyder, Ulrich 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Seedat, Soraya 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Shatri, Fatlinda 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Hao Fong Sit 10   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Roland von Känel 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Spiller, Tobias R 11   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 School of Psychology, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia 
 Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; US Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut, Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA 
 Facultad de Medicina & Neuron Research Group Lima, Universidad de Piura, Lima, Perú; Facultad de Medicina “San Fernando”, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú 
 Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel 
 Center for Global Health equity, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA 
 Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 
 Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden 
 University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 
 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa 
10  Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China 
11  Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; US Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut, Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Dec 2022
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
e-ISSN
20008066
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2756861477
Copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.