Abstract
Parental age can have considerable effects on offspring phenotypes and health. However, intergenerational effects may also have longer term effects on offspring fitness. Few studies have investigated parental age effects on offspring fitness in natural populations while also testing for sex‐ and environment‐specific effects. Further, longitudinal parental age effects may be masked by population‐level processes such as the selective disappearance of poor‐quality individuals. Here, we used multigenerational data collected on individually marked Seychelles warblers (Acrocephalus sechellensis) to investigate the impact of maternal and paternal age on offspring life span and lifetime reproductive success. We found negative effects of maternal age on female offspring life span and lifetime reproductive success, which were driven by within‐mother effects. There was no difference in annual reproductive output of females born to older versus younger mothers, suggesting that the differences in offspring lifetime reproductive success were driven by effects on offspring life span. In contrast, there was no association between paternal age and female offspring life span or either maternal or paternal age and male offspring life span. Lifetime reproductive success, but not annual reproductive success, of male offspring increased with maternal age, but this was driven by between‐mother effects. No paternal age effects were found on female offspring lifetime reproductive success but there was a positive between‐father effect on male offspring lifetime reproductive success. We did not find strong evidence for environment‐dependent parental age effects. Our study provides evidence for parental age effects on the lifetime fitness of offspring and shows that such effects can be sex dependent. These results add to the growing literature indicating the importance of intergenerational effects on long‐term offspring performance and highlight that these effects can be an important driver of variation in longevity and fitness in the wild.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Hammers, Martijn 2
; Komdeur, Jan 3 ; Burke, Terry 4
; Richardson, David S 5
; Dugdale, Hannah L 6
1 Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
2 Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Aeres University of Applied Sciences, Almere, The Netherlands
3 Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
4 School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
5 School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; Nature Seychelles, Mahé, Republic of Seychelles
6 Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands





