Background
Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is the causative agent of a range of infections including but not limited to pneumonia, sepsis, bacteremia, and urinary tract infections (UTI) whether community or health care acquired infections [1]. Worryingly, there is a significantly higher risk of K. pneumoniae being multidrug-resistant (MDR) in nosocomial infections than in community-acquired infections because of the misuse of antibiotics, and thus, most patients carry flora which are resistant to antibiotics [2, 3]. Infections with multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae are widespread in developed and developing countries with bad prognosis, high mortality rate, and very high-associated economic costs [4]. Only few drugs such as tigecycline and polymyxins may be effective against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. Although new sensitive antimicrobial agents for treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-KP) infections such as ceftazidime-avibactam have emerged in recent years, they are still ineffective against New-Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-producing CR-KP [5]. Moreover, a wide range of antimicrobial resistance genes further restricts the available options to effectively treat infections [6].
The evolution of K. pneumoniae into resistant strain that was responsible for increased morbidity and mortality especially among critically ill patients was the main principle to conduct a detailed study about this organism, its resistance pattern, and type of its resistance genes.
Methods
Study design
A cross-sectional study was carried out on critically ill patients with age range from 1 month to 12 years admitted to a university-affiliated Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) over a period of 1 year (first of January to the end of December 2021).
Data collection
All patients were subjected to detailed history taking and thorough clinical examination including pediatric index of mortality (PIM-2) and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores [7, 8]. Meticulous follow-up of patients during their PICU length of stay (LOS) for identification of any type of infection, routine laboratory, and radiological diagnosis of the infection and recording the fate of these patients whether survived or deceased.
Laboratory identification of K. pneumoniae
Different bacteriological cultures were obtained upon specific infection case definition: urine, stool, blood (venous), nasopharyngeal swab, cerebero-spinal fluid (CSF) culture, and non-bronchoscopic broncho-alveolar lavage (NB-BAL) for mechanically ventilated cases.
All collected samples were processed according to standard microbiological procedures for each type of specimen. Specimens were inoculated using the following media: the blood, chocolate, MacConkey’s agar, and the plates were incubated at 37°C. Blood culture were performed using automated blood culture system (BACT/ALERT 3D system; BioMérieux). The blood culture bottles were incubated in the BACT/ALERT 3D system as recommended by the manufacturer for seven consecutive days. All isolated organisms were identified according to colonial morphology (hemolytic or non-hemolytic colonies on blood agar, lactose or non-lactose colonies on MacConkey’s agar), Gram staining reaction, and biochemical reactions (triple sugar iron, urease, citrate, motility, ornithine decarboxylation, indole tests) according to the standard microbiological methods [9].
Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed for bacterial isolates using Bauer-Kirby disc diffusion method according to the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) recommendations [10].
NB-BAL, CSF, and earliest positive blood culture samples were subjected to an immediate multiplex PCR assessment using an automated closed system (Film-Array, Bio-Fire, USA, Serial Number 2FA06414) [11] to detect the possible bacteria and viruses, and the corresponding resistance genes were identified within 60–70 min from admission and management plans were designed accordingly.
Statistical analysis
The SPSS-IBM software statistical package was used for the computer statistical analysis of data [12]. Data was presented as a range, mean, median, standard deviation, and standard error. Descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies and percent were used to describe the categorical data variables while scale data were expressed by mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables and median with range for skewed variables. The distributions of quantitative variables were tested for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If it revealed normal data distribution, parametric tests were applied. If the data were abnormally distributed (skewed), non-parametric tests were used. The univariate and multivariate logistic model were used to estimate the probability of a binary response based on one or more predictor (or independent) variables. An alpha level was set to 5% with a significance level of 95%, and a beta error accepted up to 20% with a power of study of 80%.
Results
Out of 246 patients admitted to PICU during the study period (first of January to the end of December 2021), 44 patients had 54 positive cultures for K. pneumoniae, out of which 27 patients (61.4%) survived their infection and 17 patients (38.6%) passed away as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 [Images not available. See PDF.]
RECORD strategy of the recruitment of the studied population
Patients with worse PIM2 and PELOD scores were more subjected to longer length of stay (LOS) in PICU, and those suffering from extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of K. pneumoniae were more associated with fatal outcome (Table 1). The most prevalent resistant gene was New Delhi metallo-beta lactamase (NDM) gene (65.4%) followed by cefotaximase (CTX-M) gene (57.7%) as shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows that NDM and CTX-M-resistant genes showed high although not significant resistance to carbapenems (29.3% and 33.4%, respectively) and to colistin (23.5% and 26.7%, respectively). In univariate analysis of mortality risk factors, PIM2, PELOD scores, LOS, and XDR were associated with significant risk of mortality. After adjusting all confounders, only PELOD score and XDR were considered significant risks for mortality with odds ratio of 2.4 and 139.5, respectively (Table 4).
Table 1. Comparison between the studied groups according to demographic data
Demographic data | Total (n =44) | Outcome | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Discharged (n = 27) | Deceased (n =17) | |||
Sexn(%) | ||||
Male | 23 (52.3%) | 13 (48.1%) | 10 (58.8%) | 0.490 |
Female | 21 (47.7%) | 14 (51.9%) | 7 (41.2%) | |
Age (months)n(%) | ||||
<12 | 33 (75.0%) | 21 (77.8%) | 12 (70.6%) | MCp=0.648 |
12–60 | 8 (18.2%) | 5 (18.5%) | 3 (17.6%) | |
>60 | 3 (6.8%) | 1 (3.7%) | 2 (11.8%) | |
PIM2 | ||||
Min.–Max. | 2.0–100.0 | 2.0–72.50 | 9.0–100.0 | 0.037* |
Mean ± SD. | 39.4 ± 26.6 | 32.0 ± 22.0 | 51.1 ± 29.6 | |
Median (IQR) | 34.0 (20–56.87) | 25.6 (18.25–55.7) | 49.0 (32–71.50) | |
LOS (weeks) | ||||
Min.–Max. | 0.14–12.0 | 1.14–12.0 | 0.14–4.0 | <0.001* |
Mean ± SD. | 2.60 ± 2.33 | 3.42 ± 2.49 | 1.31 ± 1.27 | |
Median (IQR) | 2.0 (1.07–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 0.71 (0.43–2.0) | |
PELOD | ||||
Min.–Max. | 6.0–30.0 | 6.0–21.0 | 16.0–30.0 | <0.001* |
Mean ± SD. | 17.16 ± 5.87 | 13.93 ± 4.28 | 22.29 ± 4.15 | |
Median (IQR) | 17 (14.0–21.5) | 14.0 (11–16.5) | 22 (18.0–24.0) | |
Resistance | ||||
MDR | 37 (84.1%) | 26 (96.3%) | 11 (64.7%) | 0.009* |
XDR | 7 (15.9%) | 1 (3.7%) | 6 (35.3%) | |
PDR | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
PIM2 pediatric index of mortality 2, LOS length of stay, PELOD pediatric logistic organ dysfunction, MDR multidrug-resistant, XDR extensive drug-resistant, PDR pan-drug-resistant
*p value significant
Table 2. Comparison between the studied groups according to the presence of antibiotic-resistant genes in PCR positive cases
Resistant genes | Total (n =26) | Outcome | χ2 | FEp | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discharged (n = 19) | Died (n =7) | |||||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
CTX-M | 15 | 57.7 | 10 | 52.6 | 5 | 71.4 | 0.740 | 0.658 |
IMP | 1 | 3.8 | 1 | 5.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.383 | 1.000 |
KPC | 1 | 3.8 | 1 | 5.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.383 | 1.000 |
NDM | 17 | 65.4 | 13 | 68.4 | 4 | 57.1 | 0.287 | 0.661 |
OXA-48-like | 3 | 11.5 | 2 | 10.5 | 1 | 14.3 | 0.071 | 1.000 |
VIM | 1 | 3.8 | 1 | 5.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.383 | 1.000 |
χ2 chi-square test, FE Fisher’s exact, CTX-M cefotaximase, IMP imipenemases, OXA oxacillinase, KPC Klebsiella pneumonaie carbapenemases, NDM New-delhi M, VIM Veronem integron M
Table 3. The relation between the presence of antibiotic resistance genes by PCR and the results of disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test for carbapenems and colistin by standard microbiological tests
Resistant genes | Carbapenems resistance | Colistin resistance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S (n = 17) | R (n = 9) | S (n = 20) | R (n = 6) | |||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
CTX-M (n= 15) | 10 | 66.7 | 5 | 33.3 | 11 | 73.3 | 4 | 26.7 |
χ2(p) | 0.026 (FEp=1.000) | 1.262 (FEp=0.356) | ||||||
IMP (n= 1) | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
χ2(p) | 0.551 (FEp=1.000) | 0.248 (FEp=1.000) | ||||||
KPC (n= 1) | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
χ2(p) | 0.551 (FEp=1.000) | 0.248 (FEp=1.000) | ||||||
NDM (n= 17) | 12 | 70.6 | 5 | 29.4 | 13 | 76.5 | 4 | 23.5 |
χ2(p) | 0.588 (FEp=0.667) | 0.584 (FEp=0.628) | ||||||
OXA-48-like (n= 3) | 1 | 33.3 | 2 | 66.7 | 2 | 66.7 | 1 | 33.3 |
χ2(p) | 1.539 (FEp=0.268) | 0.434 (FEp=0.488) | ||||||
VIM (n= 1) | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 100.0 |
χ2(p) | 0.551 (FEp=1.000) | 4.368 (FEp=0.192) |
χ2 chi-square test, FE Fisher’s exact, S susceptible, R resistant, CTX-M cefotaximase, IMP imipenemases, KPC Klebsiella pneumonaie carbapenemases, NDM, New-Delhi, M, OXA oxacillinase, VIM veronem integron M
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis for parameters affecting mortality
Univariate | Multivariate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
P | OR (95% C.I) | p | OR (95% C.I) | |
Females | 0.491 | 0.650 (0.191–2.215) | ||
Age (months) | 0.296 | 1.011 (0.991–1.031) | ||
PIM2 | 0.026* | 1.030*(1.003–1.058) | 0.952 | 1.002 (0.927–1.084) |
PELOD | 0.001* | 1.800*(1.261–2.568) | 0.032* | 2.455* (1.079–5.586) |
Drug resistance (XDR) | 0.020* | 14.182*(1.523–132.1) | 0.041* | 139.50* (1.238–15725.9) |
LOS (Weeks) | 0.005* | 0.375* (0.190–0.741) | 0.066 | 0.218 (0.043–1.105) |
OR odd’s ratio, C.I confidence interval, LOS length of stay, XDR extensive drug-resistance, PIM2 pediatric index of mortality 2, PELOD pediatric logistic organ dysfunction
*p value significant
Kaplan-Meier cumulative of survival curve (Fig. 2) showed a significant difference between patients with XDR and non-XDR K. pneumoniae-infected patients (p = 0.016).
Fig. 2 [Images not available. See PDF.]
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for survival comparing extensive and non-extensive drug-resistant klebsiella-infected patients (p = 0.016*)
Discussion
During this 1-year study duration, K. pneumoniae infections was retrieved in 15% of the positive culture results (54/360) in this PICU. In the current study, 84.1% of K pneumoniae were considered multidrug-resistant (MDR) which are resistant to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial groups and 15.9% were considered XDR that means these isolates were resistant to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories [13]. This high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance detected in this study could be attributed to the overuse of antibiotic and the permission to buy different forms of antibiotics even the injectable ones and the last resort antimicrobial therapy as over the counter.
During the last decade, a growing number of K. pneumoniae, pseudomonas, and E. coli have developed resistance against third generation cephalosporins due to extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL). Moreover, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant organisms are particularly dangerous as only few treatment options remain for patients and the outcomes are generally poor [14]. Carbapenemase production had become the predominant mechanism of resistance in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, followed by high production of ESBL and Amp C Beta lactamases, coupled with reduced membrane permeability [15].
The prevalent carbapenemases in K. pneumoniae are K. carbapenemase (KPC), the metallo-beta–lactamases especially the one first detected in New-Delhi (NDM), veronem integeron M (VIM), imipenemases (IMP), and the oxacillinase type mainly (OXA-48). These carbapenemases encoding genes are usually carried on MDR transmissible plasmid that confer resistance to multiple antibiotics [16].
Recently, Colistin has been considered the last resort antibiotic for multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae and its use has led to the appearance of colistin-resistant strains. This evolution of Klebsiella resistant to antibiotics has been observed repeatedly everywhere [17–19]. The present study PCR results revealed that the predominant resistant gene in the studied population was the NDM (65.4%) followed by CTX-M (57.7%) and OXA-48 was found in 11.5% of cases. The distribution of resistant genes varies geographically, but it was noted by many researchers the increasing prevalence of NDM. The emergence of bacteria carrying such genes represent a big challenge for physicians to treat. In a systematic review published 2017, Khan et al. [20] demonstrated the worldwide distribution of NDM variants across the globe where they stated that Asian continent serves as the major reservoir of NDM producers (58.15%) mostly in China and India. Europe showed around 16.8%. American continents and Africa carried around 10.8% each. The review also stated that Egypt demonstrated low prevalence of NDM producers. The current study showed different results proving that klebsiella have evolved in Egypt and has shown a predominance of NDM genes in 65.4% of the isolates. This serves as a good demonstration for the continued evolution of resistant markers as NDM among Klebsiella pneumoniae due to selection pressure, and this emphasizes the importance of continuous surveillance of such resistant genes.
Results of the current study shows that 23.5% of NDM Klebsiella producers were found resistant to colistin as well. This finding raises concern about the possible major health threat presented by Klebsiella if it acquires resistance to all last resort antibiotics leaving very limited if any option for its treatment, and this is another alarming finding about the evolution of Klebsiella. While not many new active antibiotics are developed against the organism, an additional antibiotic resistance against colistin was noticed in the current study.
Adjusting the different risk factors of mortality in klebsiella-infected patients to the PIM-2 score in a multiple logistic regression model proved that PELOD score and antibiotic resistance especially XDR were independently related to mortality. The regression model shows that XDR Klebsiella infection increased the odds of mortality 139 times. Kaplan-Meier curve also proved that XDR Klebsiella infection was statistically related to shorter cumulative of survival. Comparable results were also reported by many authors. Pan et al. [21] stated that high APACHE II score, continuous renal-replacement therapy, and carbapenemase-producing klebsiella were independently related to mortality. Zhang et al. [22] specified that mechanical ventilation, septic shock, and isolation of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality, and they found that carbapenem resistance alone increased the odds of mortality 9 times compared to susceptible Klebsiella.
The current study is not without limitations. First, given the prospective study design, the sample size was relatively limited and number of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in the studied population was relatively small. Second, results of this study represent the experience of a tertiary care level university-affiliated PICU with a high-level certified performance. This does not reflect other centers’ approach for treating Klebsiella infected patients, and thus, the results could not be generalized. A multicenter study would be highly recommended to enforce the results already discussed.
Conclusion
Klebsiella isolates retrieved in this study showed high grade of resistance to antibiotics. PCR results showed that NDM was the most common resistance gene detected in Klebsiella isolates. About 23% of NDM containing Klebsiella showed resistance to colistin. This evolution of resistance of klebsiella pneumoniae was proved to be associated with a high mortality rate. Continuous widespread surveillance of Klebsiella pathogen focusing on identification of resistance genes and antibiotic resistance pattern is highly recommended.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Authors’ contributions
AN was responsible for the idea, data analysis, and revision of the manuscript. MAM was responsible for the microbiological aspect of the study. AMB was responsible for the protocol implementation and data collection. MA was responsible for the protocol, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable
Availability of data and materials
All raw data and materials are available upon request from the corresponding author via an email.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research was implemented after approval of the University Medical Ethical Committee. All methods were carried out in accordance with ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. An informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of patients.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Abbreviations
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Urinary tract infection
Multidrug resistance
Extended-drug resistance
Carbapenem-resistant-Klebsiella pneumoniae
Pediatric intensive care unit
Pediatric index of mortality 2
Pediatric logistic organ dysfunction
Length of stay
Cerebro-spinal fluid
Non-bronchoscopic-bronchoalveolar lavage
Polymerase chain reaction
New-Delhi metallo-beta lactamase
Cefotaximase
Veronem integeron M
Imipenemases
Oxacillinase-48
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. Paczosa, MK; Mecsas, J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev; 2016; 80,
2. Kawai, S; Ochi, M; Nakagawa, T; Goto, H. Antimicrobial therapy in community-acquired pneumonia among emergency patients in a university hospital in Japan. J Infect Chemother; 2004; 10, pp. 352-358. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10156-004-0350-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15614461]
3. Lin, YT; Jeng, YY; Chen, TL; Fung, CP. Bacteremic community acquired pneumonia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae: clinical and microbiological characteristics in Taiwan, 2001-2008. BMC Infect Dis; 2010; 10, pp. 307-309. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-307] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20973971][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987304]
4. Ricklin, D; Reis, ES; Mastellos, DC. Complement component c3-The “swiss Army Knife” of innate immunity and host defense. Immunol Rev; 2016; 274, pp. 33-58. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12500] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27782325][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427221][COI: 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xhslagsb7N]
5. Viale, P; Giannella, M; Lewis, R; Trecarichi, EM; Petrosillo, N; Tumbarello, M. Predictors of mortality in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2013; 11,
6. Holt, KE; Wertheim, H; Zadoks, RN. Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA; 2015; 112, pp. E3574-E3581. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501049112] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26100894][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4500264][COI: 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtVOhsbjO]
7. Qureshi, AU; Ali, AS; Ahmad, TM. Comparison of three prognostic scores (PRISM, PELOD and PIM 2) at pediatric intensive care unit under Pakistani circumstances. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19,
8. Leteurtre, S; Martinot, A; Duhamel, A et al. Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet.; 2003; 362,
9. Tille, PM. Tille, PM. Traditional cultivation and identification. Bailey & Scott’s diagnostic microbiology; 2013; 13 St. Louis, Mosby Elsevier: pp. 204-220.
10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 26th ed. CLSI supplement M100; 2016; Wayne, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: pp. 18-40.
11. BioFire® FilmArray® Panels, Comprehensive panels and better diagnostics (https://www.biofiredx.com/products/the-filmarray-panels/) [last Access March 2022]
12. Feeney, B. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0; 2012; USA, Cengage learning:
13. Magiorakos, AP; Srinivasan, RB; Carey, Y; Carmeli, Y; Falagas, ME; Giske, CG et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microb infect; 2012; 8, pp. 268-281. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x]
14. Diwakar, K; Kumar, R; Mishra, S; Gupta, M. Health care associated infection in a pediatric intensive care unit. Indian J Child Health; 2019; 6,
15. Logan, LK; Braykov, NP; Weinstein, RA; Laxminarayan, R. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant enterobacteriaceae in children: trends in the United States, 1999-2011. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc; 2014; 3,
16. Hawkey, PM. Prevalence and clonality of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Asia. Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008; 14, pp. 159-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01855.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18154540][COI: 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtleiu7o%3D]
17. Padhi, S. New Delhi metallo-beta lactamase: a weapon for the newly emerging drug-resistant bacteria. Ind J Med Sci; 2011; 65, pp. 317-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.107767]
18. Havan, M; Kendrili, T; Perk, O; Ozsoy, G; Ozcan, S; Parler, T et al. A major clinical challenge in pediatric intensive care unit with pan-drug-resistant OXA-48 klebsiella pneumonia outbreak. Ped Clin Care Med; 2018; 19,
19. Kumarasamy, KK; Toleman, MA; Walsh, TR; Bargaria, J; Butt, F; Bala Krishnan, R et al. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan and UK. Lancet Infect Dis; 2010; 10, pp. 597-602. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70143-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20705517][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933358][COI: 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVGqsrrP]
20. Khan, AU; Maryam, L; Zarrilli, R. Structure, genetics and worldwide spread of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM): a threat to public health. BMC Microbiol; 2017; 17,
21. Pan, H; Lou, Y; Zeng, L; Wang, L; Zhang, J; Yu, W et al. Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumonaiae: microbiological characteristics and risk factors. Microb Drug Resis; 2019; 25,
22. Zhang, Y; Guo, LY; Song, WQ; Wang, Y; Dong, F; Liu, G. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection and predictors of mortality in Chinese paediatric patients. BMC Infect Dis; 2018; 18,
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
Infections with multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae is associated with high morbidity and mortality especially among critically ill patients. This was the main principle to conduct a detailed study about this organism, its resistance pattern, and type of its resistance genes
Subjects and methods
A cross-sectional study was carried out in a pediatric intensive care unit on patients with age range from 1 month to 12 years over a period of 1 year with positive K. pneumoniae using standard microbiological culture and antibiogram sensitivity testing. All collected samples were processed using multiplex PCR technique to identify the most relevant resistant genes.
Results
Forty-four patients had 54 positive cultures for K. pneumoniae, out of which 17 patients (38.6%) passed away. The most prevalent-resistant gene was New Delhi metallo-beta lactamase (NDM) gene (65.4%) followed by cefotaximase (CTX-M) gene (57.7%). Extensively drug-resistant K. pneumoniae was detected in (15.9%) of the results and was proved to be independent risk factor increasing mortality odds 139 folds.
Conclusion
The evolution of resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae was proved to be associated with a high mortality rate. Continuous widespread surveillance of Klebsiella pathogen focusing on identification of resistance genes and antibiotic resistance pattern is highly recommended.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Alexandria University, Faculty of Medicine, El-Shatby Children’s Hospital Alexandria, Pediatrics and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Alexandria, Egypt (GRID:grid.7155.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2260 6941)
2 Alexandria University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Alexandria, Egypt (GRID:grid.7155.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2260 6941)
3 Alexandria University, Faculty of Medicine, El-Shatby Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Alexandria, Egypt (GRID:grid.7155.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2260 6941)