Esophageal diverticulum is a relatively rare benign condition of the esophagus, and the presence of an esophageal diverticulum is frequently accompanied with esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia and regurgitation. Spontaneous rupture of the esophageal diverticulum is a non-traumatic rupture of the full floor of the esophageal diverticulum wall and it is mostly caused by a sudden increase in esophageal pressure [1]. Because the esophagus is close to the lungs and heart, the rupture of the esophageal diverticulum is usually dangerous. However, there is no standardized treatment for spontaneous rupture of the esophageal diverticulum.
Therefore, this article reports a case of spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture in our hospital, and summarizes the diagnosis and treatment methods of spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture on the basis of literature analysis.
This case study focuses on a female patient who is 74 years old. On 25 June 2020, she came to see a doctor for sudden upper abdominal pain and back pain after a meal. Her computer tomography (CT) (Figure 1) showed that there was a liquid pneumothorax in the right pleural cavity, with free gas in the mediastinum and neck, and scattered inflammation in both lungs. Therefore, she was given closed chest drainage, anti-infective and supportive care. Since the chest drain contained food debris, she was given a gastric tube to relieve pressure. On 28 June 2020, after her condition stabilized, the esophagography (Figure 2) showed a bag -shaped change on the right side of the chest, and there was a relative barium meal leakage. On 29 June 2020, her upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (Figure 3a,b) showed that there was an esophageal diverticulum opening in the esophageal wall 35 cm from the incisors. Considering the patient’s age and diverticulum rupture time and no other risk factors identified, she was given conservatively continued treatment with enteral nutrition and gastric decompression drainage with a three-lumen feeding tube. The drainage effect was good, and the inflammation was significantly reduced. On 31 July 2020, her upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (Figure 4) showed that the opening of the diverticulum had basically closed. After that, the patient had no particular discomfort, and her condition gradually stabilized. She was discharged from the hospital and asked to return for re-examination after half a month. Two years later, we called to enquire about her situation and found that she was still in good health.
The Web of Science database and PubMed database were searched for articles from 1971 to 2022. Ultimately, 13 cases met our inclusion criteria. Finally, the reported general demographic data, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment options, and prognosis were collected, recorded, and summarized (Table 1 and Table 2). We examined the relevant literature and outlined a few crucial problems that clinicians should be aware of.
Esophageal diverticulum is very rare, with an incidence rate of less than 1% of the total population [15]. As show in Table 1 and Table 2, a total of 13 patients with spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture were reported in 13 studies and, including our case, a total of 14 patients with an average age of 61.7 years (50–76 years), including 12 (85.7%) male patients and 2 (14.3%) female patients, and most cases (64.3%) had no obvious cause. Studies have shown that the cause of esophageal rupture is mainly related to severe vomiting after meals [16] and, in our study, only one case was a diverticulum rupture after vomiting. In addition to this, including our case, there were six patients with diverticulum rupture associated with meals.
As show in Table 2, chest pain (42.9%), progressive dysphagia (42.9%), and epigastric pain (35.7%) were the main symptoms of most patients. Although vomiting, chest pain, and subcutaneous emphysema are the Mackler triad of esophageal rupture [17], in our study, only one patient had vomiting symptoms. In addition, our study found that these 14 patients had a relatively high confirmed diagnosis rate (78.6%) during the diagnosis process. For the treatment of spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture, surgery was performed in the majority of cases (71.4%). In many studies, the mortality rate of esophageal rupture is high, above 20% [18,19,20]. However, the mortality rate of esophageal diverticulum rupture was only 7.1% in our study. This may be related to the high confirmed diagnosis rate in our study and the individualized treatment approach used in all cases. The above findings show that there might be new inspiration for the treatment of esophageal diverticulum rupture.
Studies have shown that supraphrenic diverticulum mostly occurs on the right side of the esophagus [21,22], and our research has also confirmed this. In our study, esophageal diverticula were mostly located in the lower segments (50%) and right side of the esophagus (57.1%). Many studies have shown that spontaneous esophageal rupture usually occurs in the lower third of the esophagus and on the left side of the esophagus, which is related to the thin muscle layer of the left side of the esophagus [23,24]. However, as shown in Table 1, in our study, half of the spontaneous esophageal diverticulum ruptures on the right side of the esophagus are located in the lower segments of the esophagus. Moreover, studies have shown that epiphrenic diverticula located in the lower esophagus are mostly located on the right side of the esophagus [22]. As shown in this study, the location of the esophageal diverticulum is related to the adjacent mediastinal structures. For the diagnosis of esophageal diverticulum ruptures, chest X-ray and CT can only diagnose perforation but not confirm diagnosis, and esophagography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are the most accurate ways of diagnosis [25]. In our study, most cases were diagnosed by esophagography (71.4%) and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (57.1%).
The treatment of esophageal diverticulum rupture is often formulated according to the treatment plan and specific conditions of the esophageal diverticulum.
Considering that most of the patients are elderly, non-surgical conservative treatment is the first choice when surgery cannot be tolerated or the optimal time for surgery is missed. Non-surgical conservative treatment is mainly catheter drainage, anti-infection and supportive care. The catheter mainly includes a chest drainage tube, gastric tube, and three-lumen feeding tube. Their main role is to reduce gastric acid irritation, relieve pressure in the esophagus, and provide enteral nutrition. According to our experience, if conditions permit, a gastric tube is placed in the esophageal diverticulum to drain, and the treatment effect will be better. Drugs mainly include acid suppressants and anti-inflammatory drugs. Our patient was treated with non-surgical conservative treatment because of her old age. In addition, her esophageal diverticulum has been ruptured for a long timeand no risk factors for gastric tube drainage in the diverticulum., Therefore, she recovered well.
Spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture is rare. It occurs mostly in senior men and ruptures of the esophageal diverticulum in the right lower esophagus are the most common. At present, there is no standardized treatment for esophageal diverticulum rupture. The treatment method is mainly based on the treatment of esophageal diverticulum and individualized treatment methods are formulated according to the situation of the patient’s diverticulum rupture. Furthermore, there are several key points that physicians should keep in mind when caring for a patient with spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture. First, spontaneous rupture of esophageal diverticulum is mostly associated with chronic swallowing difficulties and chest pain or vomiting after meals that cannot be explained. Second, when patients cannot tolerate surgery or miss the optimal time for surgery, we may consider non-surgical treatment, in which infection control is very important. Finally, regardless of surgical or non-surgical treatment, early confirmed diagnosis and individualized treatment are crucial for favorable prognosis.
Conceptualization, Y.Z.; methodology, S.D. and S.X.; software, S.D.; validation, S.D.; formal analysis, S.D.; investigation, Y.Z.; data curation, S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D. and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.D.; visualization, S.D.; supervision, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital (protocol code K-W-2022-030 and date of approval 10 November 2022).
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.
Data available on request due to privacy restrictions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest shows the gas in the right thoracic cavity and mediastinum (arrows) and right pleural effusion (star).
Figure 2. The esophagography shows leakage of contrast medium (white arrow), barium meal leakage, and esophageal diverticulum on the right side of the esophagus (black arrow).
Figure 3. (a) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showing the opening of the esophageal diverticulum 35 cm from the incisors, in which a large amount of necrosis was observed. (b) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showing a smooth esophageal wall connected to the esophageal diverticulum.
Figure 4. Re-examination of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showing an esophageal diverticulum opening measuring 0.5 × 0.3 cm (arrow) with surrounding scar-like hyperplasia (star).
Baseline characteristics of 13 patients with spontaneous rupture of esophageal diverticulum.
Year | Author | Age (Years) | Sex | Location | Diagnostic or Not | Treatment | Outcome | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1985 | Gutiérrez del Olmo et al. [ |
74 | F | ME | R | N | NST | Cured |
1996 | Oka et al. [ |
53 | M | ME | R | Y | NST and then ST | Cured |
2000 | Pistorius et al. [ |
76 | M | ME | L | Y | ST | Died |
2000 | Murakami et al. [ |
61 | M | LE | A | Y | ST | Cured |
2003 | Cantù. [ |
75 | M | LE | R | Y | ST | Cured |
2004 | Lee et al. [ |
68 | M | LE | L | Y | ST | Cured |
2006 | Mecklenburg et al. [ |
40 | M | ME | Unclear | Y | Self-healing | Cured |
2009 | Hung. [ |
50 | M | UE | R | N | NST | Unclear |
2014 | Almre et al. [ |
53 | M | UE | P | Y | ST | Cured |
2018 | Onodera et al. [ |
58 | M | LE | R | Y | ST | Cured |
2019 | Ding et al. [ |
64 | M | LE | L | N | ST | Cured |
2021 | Morita et al. [ |
51 | M | UE | L | Y | ST | Cured |
2022 | Wangkulangkul et al. [ |
67 | M | LE | R | Y | ST | Cured |
F: Female, M: Male, UE: Upper segments of esophagus, ME: Middle segments of esophagus, LE: Lower segments of esophagus, R: Right side of esophagus, L: Left side of esophagus, A: Anterior side of esophagus, P: Posterior side of esophagus, N: No, Y: Yes, NST: Non-surgical treatment, ST: Surgical treatment.
Summary features of 14 patients with spontaneous rupture of esophageal diverticulum.
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Age, year | 61.7 (50–76) |
Sex | |
Male | 12 (85.7%) |
Female | 2 (14.3%) |
Location | |
Upper segments of esophagus | 3 (21.4%) |
Middle segments of esophagus | 4 (28.6%) |
Lower segments of esophagus | 7 (50%) |
Left side of esophagus | 4 (28.6%) |
Right side of esophagus | 8 (57.1%) |
Anterior side of esophagus | 1 (7.1%) |
Posterior side of esophagus | 1 (7.1%) |
Etiology | 1 case was caused by vomiting (7.1%) |
Treatment | |
Non-surgical treatment | 4 (28.6%) |
Surgical treatment | 10 (71.4%) |
Esophageal diverticulum repair | 5 (35.7%) |
Esophagectomy | 4 (28.6%) |
Magnet-assisted endoscopic diverticulotomy | 1 (7.1%) |
Misdiagnosis | 3 (21.4%) |
Confirmed | 11 (78.6%) |
Outcome | |
Cured | 12 (85.7%) |
Died | 1 (7.1%) |
Unclear | 1 (7.1%) |
References
1. Onwugbufor, M.T.; Obirieze, A.C.; Ortega, G.; Allen, D.; Cornwell, E.E.; Fullum, T.M. Surgical management of esophageal diverticulum: A review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. J. Surg. Res.; 2013; 184, pp. 120-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.036] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23751803]
2. del Olmo, A.G.; Loscos, J.; Baki, W.; Nazal, R.; Nisa, E.; Ramirez-Armengol, J. Spontaneous Intramural Oesophageal Perforation. Endoscopy; 1985; 17, pp. 76-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1018462] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3987637]
3. Oka, T.; Yamaoka, N.; Taniguchi, H.; Hisamatsu, T.; Uchiyama, Y. Successful application of an omental pedicle flap in delayed repair of a perforated esophageal diverticulum: Report of a case. Surg. Today; 1996; 26, pp. 919-922. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00311796] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8931225]
4. Pistorius, G.A.; Hegenauer, K.; Pahl, S.; Feifel, G. Intrathoracic diverticulum caused by a leiomyoma: A rare case of spontaneous oesophageal rupture. Eur. J. Surg.; 2000; 166, pp. 426-428. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10881960]
5. Murakami, M.; Tsuchiya, K.; Ichikawa, H.; Kawaguchi, K.; Sugiyama, A.; Ishida, K.; Chisuwa, H.; Kawasaki, S. Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis associated with esophageal perforation. J. Gastroenterol.; 2000; 35, pp. 702-711. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s005350070050]
6. Cantù, P. Spontaneous perforation of an oesophageal diverticulum in achalasia. Dig. Liver Dis.; 2003; 35, pp. 735-737. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(03)00419-5]
7. Lee, J.-H.; Chae, H.-S.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Wang, Y.-P.; Lee, S.-H.; Jo, K.-H.; Park, J.-K.; Sim, S.-B.; Yoon, J.-S. et al. Delayed Primary Repair of Perforated Epiphrenic Diverticulum. J. Korean Med. Sci.; 2004; 19, pp. 887-890. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2004.19.6.887]
8. Mecklenburg, I.; Weber, C.; Folwaczny, C. Spontaneous Recovery of Dysphagia by Rupture of an Esophageal Diverticulum in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Dig. Dis. Sci.; 2006; 51, pp. 1241-1242. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-8042-7]
9. Hung, W.K. Perforated esophagus or large diverticulum?. Ann. Thorac. Surg.; 2009; 87, 1620. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.063]
10. Almre, I.; Asser, A.; Laisaar, T. Pharyngoesophageal diverticulum perforation 18 years after anterior cervical fixation. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg.; 2014; 18, pp. 240-241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt421]
11. Onodera, Y.; Nakano, T.; Fukutomi, T.; Naitoh, T.; Unno, M.; Shibata, C.; Kamei, T. Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for a Patient With Perforated Esophageal Epiphrenic Diverticulum After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report. Transplant. Proc.; 2018; 50, pp. 3964-3967. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.042] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30577297]
12. Ding, X.; Huang, T.; Zou, X. Gastrointestinal: A case of spontaneous rupture of esophageal diverticulum. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.; 2019; 34, 1475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14662] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945353]
13. Morita, F.H.A.; Neto, H.B.; Sakai, P.; Brito, G.B.; Morita, S. Magnet-assisted endoscopic diverticulotomy for an esophageal diverticulum after anterior cervical spine surgery: First case report. Endosc. Int. Open; 2021; 9, pp. E824-E827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1339-0953]
14. Wangkulangkul, P.; Laohawiriyakamol, S.; Chewatanakornkul, S. Laparoscopic trans-hiatal approach in a rare case of double giant epiphrenic diverticula: A case report. Asian J. Endosc. Surg.; 2021; 15, pp. 352-355. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ases.12993] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605196]
15. Wang, Z.M.; Zhang, S.C.; Teng, X. Esophageal diverticulum serves as a unique cause of bronchoesophageal fistula in children: A case report. Medicine; 2017; 96, e9492. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009492]
16. Blencowe, N.S.; Strong, S.; Hollowood, A.D. Spontaneous oesophageal rupture. BMJ; 2013; 346, f3095. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3095]
17. Rassameehiran, S.; Klomjit, S.; Nugent, K. Right-Sided Hydropneumothorax as a Presenting Symptom of Boerhaave’s Syndrome (Spontaneous Esophageal Rupture). Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc.; 2015; 28, pp. 344-346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2015.11929269]
18. Bhatia, P.; Fortin, D.; Inculet, R.I.; Malthaner, R.A. Current Concepts in the Management of Esophageal Perforations: A Twenty-Seven Year Canadian Experience. Ann. Thorac. Surg.; 2011; 92, pp. 209-215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.131]
19. Ryom, P.; Ravn, J.B.; Penninga, L.; Schmidt, S.; Iversen, M.G.; Skov-Olsen, P.; Kehlet, H. Aetiology, treatment and mortality after oesophageal perforation in Denmark. Dan. Med. Bull.; 2011; 58, A4267.
20. Vidarsdottir, H.; Blondal, S.; Alfredsson, H.; Geirsson, A.; Gudbjartsson, T. Oesophageal Perforations in Iceland: A Whole Population Study on Incidence, Aetiology and Surgical Outcome. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.; 2010; 58, pp. 476-480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1250347]
21. Tedesco, P.; Fisichella, P.M.; Way, L.W.; Patti, M.G. Cause and treatment of epiphrenic diverticula. Am. J. Surg.; 2005; 190, pp. 891-894. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16307941]
22. Fasano, N.C.; Levine, M.S.; Rubesin, S.E.; Redfern, R.O.; Laufer, I.O. Epiphrenic Diverticulum: Clinical and Radiographic Findings in 27 Patients. Dysphagia; 2003; 18, pp. 9-15. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-002-0075-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12497191]
23. De Schipper, J.; Ter Gunne, A.P.; Oostvogel, H.; Van Laarhoven, C. Spontaneous Rupture of the Oesophagus: Boerhaave’s Syndrome in 2008. Dig. Surg.; 2009; 26, pp. 1-6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000191283] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19145081]
24. Callaghan, J. The boerhaave syndrome (spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus). Br. J. Surg.; 1972; 59, pp. 41-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800590111]
25. Little, R.E.; Bock, J.M. Pharyngoesophageal diverticuli: Diagnosis, incidence and management. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol.; 2016; 24, pp. 500-504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000309]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The spontaneous rupture of the esophageal diverticulum is a rare condition that occurs without any warning signs. Its incidence is low, but the mortality rate is high. This paper reports a case of spontaneous esophageal diverticulum rupture and analyzes it along with 13 other cases to explore its prevention and treatment measures. When patients suffer from chronic swallowing difficulties and chest pain or vomiting that cannot be explained after meals, they should be suspected to have a possible spontaneous rupture of the esophageal diverticulum, which is critical to the patient’s prognosis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer