It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Forest mortality caused by convective storms (windthrow) is a major disturbance in the Amazon. However, the linkage between windthrows at the surface and convective storms in the atmosphere remains unclear. In addition, the current Earth system models (ESMs) lack mechanistic links between convective wind events and tree mortality. Here we find an empirical relationship that maps convective available potential energy, which is well simulated by ESMs, to the spatial pattern of large windthrow events. This relationship builds connections between strong convective storms and forest dynamics in the Amazon. Based on the relationship, our model projects a 51 ± 20% increase in the area favorable to extreme storms, and a 43 ± 17% increase in windthrow density within the Amazon by the end of this century under the high-emission scenario (SSP 585). These results indicate significant changes in tropical forest composition and carbon cycle dynamics under climate change.
The authors link the frequency of convective storms in the Amazon basin to the density of large forest mortality events (windthrows) and project an increase in forest disturbance from these dynamics due to climate warming over this century.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of California, Department of Geography, CA, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, CA, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
3 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, CA, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551); University of California, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, CA, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
4 University of California, Department of Geography, CA, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, CA, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)