1. Introduction
Radiation therapy (RT) is used to treat more than 70% of all cancer types [1]. Improvements in cancer therapy lead to an ever-increasing cancer cure rate. However, both RT and many chemotherapies are associated with side effects due to the injury of normal (non-cancer) tissues that are sometimes severe and almost always reduce the quality of life of cancer patients and survivors. From a clinical perspective, the dose of ionizing radiation that can be delivered is limited by the radiation tolerance of normal tissue [2]. RT of tumors in the chest may lead to the exposure of the whole or part of the heart to radiation. As a result, studies have been reported on the incidence of heart disease in ~10% or more of patients treated with RT for lung cancer, esophageal cancer, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and breast cancer [3,4,5,6]. An improved understanding of normal tissue injury, such as in the heart, is required to develop pharmaceutical interventions that increase the safety of cancer therapy [7].
Investigations in pre-clinical research models can contribute to our understanding of mechanisms by which ionizing radiation injures the heart and may point to new targets for intervention [8,9]. In RT of thoracic cancers, the heart may only be partially exposed to radiation [10,11] and a radiation exposure to certain parts of the heart may be associated with a different cardiac outcome [12,13]. While previous X-ray technologies limited small animal models to whole heart or whole chest irradiation, recent developments have enabled image-guided partial heart X-ray exposures [14,15,16]. These prior studies have shown that a partial heart irradiation in mouse models leads to changes in cardiac function and that certain parts of the mouse heart may be specifically radiation-sensitive.
Mast cells are normally present in the heart in low numbers. However, in rat models of whole heart irradiation, the cardiac mast cell numbers increase and correlate with a radiation-induced collagen deposition in the myocardium [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, increased cardiac mast cell numbers may be an indication of radiation-induced adverse remodeling in the heart.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors that recognize microbial components and endogenous ligands such as the extracellular matrix components and molecules released due to cellular injury. In complex with other transmembrane support molecules, including MD-2 [myeloid differentiation-2] and MyD88 [myeloid differentiation primary response 88], TLRs activate intracellular signaling pathways and induce the transcription of genes required for inflammatory responses. However, studies in various disease models, including in the heart, implicate that the inappropriate activation of the TLR signaling pathways results in deleterious inflammation and injury [21]. Of all TLRs, TLR4 has the highest expression in both the murine and human heart [22]. Studies have shown a role for TLR4 in myocardial inflammation due to myocardial infarction [23], myocarditis [24], and in heart failure [25]. TLR4 also regulates the production of cytokines in mast cells [26]. TLR4 inhibitors or knock-out approaches have been shown to reduce cardiac injury in many animal models, including cardiac dysfunction due to trauma hemorrhage [27]. However, while TLR4 can promote the production of collagen by cells in the heart [28], the inhibition of TLR4 does not always reduce myocardial fibrosis in cardiac disease models [29]. Moreover, despite the extensive knowledge of the role of TLR4 in cardiac disease, its role in radiation-induced heart disease is largely unknown.
In this study, we examined the effects of whole heart and partial heart irradiation on the cardiac collagen deposition, mast cell numbers, and left ventricular expression of TLR4 in male and female wild-type mice. In this model, adverse tissue remodeling occurred in both the irradiated and unirradiated portions of the heart.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Housing
All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) under protocol numbers 3955 and TR202200000004. Thirty-two male and 32 female C57BL/6J mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) at the age of 8 weeks and housed at the UAMS Division of Laboratory Animal Medicine, 4 mice per cage on a ventilated cage rack system, on a 12:12 light-to-dark cycle with free access to standard rodent chow and water.
2.2. Animal Irradiation
After one week of acclimatization, mice were exposed to whole or partial heart irradiation. For this purpose, mice were anesthetized with a 1–2% isoflurane inhalation and placed supine on a mouse platform in the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP, XStrahl, Surrey, UK). Anesthesia was maintained during irradiation via a nosecone. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was obtained of each animal (60 kV, 0.8 mA) and reconstructed using 720 projections. The SARRP Muriplan software was used to plan an X-ray beam (220 kV, 13 mA, 0.5 mm copper) locally to the heart while minimizing the exposure of the lungs and spinal cord. For whole heart irradiation, one beam (8 × 8 mm beam size) was delivered, with the gantry at −50 degrees and the couch at 75 degrees. A single dose of 8 or 16 Gy was applied. For the irradiation of the bottom 40% of the heart, one beam (5 × 5 beam size) at the same gantry and couch settings was executed, and a single dose of 16 Gy was administered. Sham-treated animals (0 Gy) were anesthetized and placed on the SARRP platform but not exposed to radiation. Example treatment plans and dose volume histograms are shown in Figure S1.
2.3. Plasma Collection
At 5 days and 2 weeks after irradiation, a peripheral blood sample was collected from each mouse. The facial vein was punctured, and 200–250 μL blood was collected into an EDTA-coated tube, immediately centrifuged at 1000× g for 15 min, and the plasma was snap-frozen and stored for metabolomics analysis.
2.4. Tissue Collection
At 6 months after irradiation, animals were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane inhalation, administered 30–40 U/kg of heparin, and the tissues were collected and immediately processed. The hearts were cut longitudinally, and one half of the heart was fixed in methanol Carnoy’s solution (60% methanol, 30% chloroform, 10% acetic acid). The remainder of the heart was dissected into the atria, left, and right ventricles and snap-frozen before their storage at −80 °C. In collecting the specimens of the left ventricle, care was taken to obtain specimens of the irradiated as well as the unirradiated parts of the heart.
2.5. Histology
All analyses were performed blinded to the experimental groups. For the determination of the collagen deposition, the sections of the heart were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated in Sirius Red supplemented with Fast Green. The sections were scanned with a ScanScope CS2 slide scanner and analyzed with ImageScope 12 software (Aperio, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) to determine the percentage of the tissue area which was positive for collagens. The top half and the bottom half of the hearts were examined separately.
Mast cells are normally present in the heart in low numbers. However, in rat models of local heart irradiation, the cardiac mast cell numbers increase and correlate with the radiation-induced collagen deposition in the myocardium [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, increased cardiac mast cell numbers may be an indication of radiation-induced adverse remodeling in the heart. To visualize mast cells, the deparaffinized and rehydrated sections of the heart were incubated in 0.5% Toluidine Blue in 0.5 N HCl for 72 h, followed by 0.7 N HCl for 10 min. The mast cells were counted using an Axioskop transmitted light microscope (Zeiss International, Oberkochen, Germany) and divided by the total tissue area.
2.6. Western-Blotting
Samples of the frozen left ventricle of both irradiated and unirradiated parts of the heart were homogenized with a Potter-Elvehjem mechanical compact stirrer (BDC2002, Caframo LabSolutions, Georgian Bluffs, ON, Canada) in a 1% Triton-X100 radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing protease inhibitors (1:100) and phosphatase inhibitors (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The protein concentration was determined with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and 25 µg of protein was added to a 2× Laemmli buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol (5%). Gel electrophoresis was performed, and the proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membranes were incubated in mouse anti-TLR4/MD2 complex (MTS510, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or mouse anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (6C5, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) in TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 5% non-fat dry milk at 4 °C overnight. After incubating with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA), the membranes were covered in enhanced chemiluminescence Plus Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) and placed on a CL-Xposure Film (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The films were developed and imaged with an AlphaImager® gel documentation system (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA). Densitometry was performed with ImageJ software. TLR4 was normalized to the loading control GAPDH and calculated relative to the expression of TLR4 in the sham-irradiated controls.
2.7. Metabolomics
The plasma samples collected at 5 days and 2 weeks were subjected to targeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry on a QTRAP 5500 (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). A detailed description of the procedures and statistical analysis is provided in Table S2.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
The metabolomics data were transformed using a log transformation to stabilize the variance, and a statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired t-test to determine the differential expression between the groups. Multiple testing correction was applied using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. Metabolites were identified that were 2-fold or more up-regulated or down-regulated at a p < 0.05 in the plasma of irradiated animals compared to the time- and sex-matched sham-irradiated controls. All other data of the male and female animals were combined and evaluated with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey–Kramer test for multiple comparisons, using the software package NCSS 8 (NCSS, Kaysville, UT, USA). The criterion for significance was p < 0.05. With this analysis approach, the study had 80% power to detect an effect size (detectable contrast/standard deviation) of 1.5. The data are reported as individual values and the mean ± standard deviation.
3. Results
3.1. Histology
The deposition of cardiac collagen did not seem to differ between males and females (Figure S2). Therefore, in Figure 1, the data from both sexes were combined. There was an increased collagen deposition 6 months after whole heart irradiation. There was no significant difference in the collagen deposition between the partially irradiated hearts and the sham-controls. Interestingly, this increase in the collagen deposition was seen in both the irradiated and unirradiated parts of the heart.
After high doses of radiation to the heart, the cardiac mast cell numbers correlate with the radiation-induced collagen deposition [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, we determined the numbers of mast cells in the heart. Radiation did not upregulate the mast cell count in either part of the heart (Figure 1).
3.2. Left Ventricular TLR4 Expression
Specimens of the left ventricular tissue were obtained from the top and bottom half of each heart and used to assess the protein levels of TLR4. There seemed to be local differences in the expression of TLR4, with a significant radiation-induced increase only in the bottom part of the left ventricle, after a dose of 8 Gy (Figure 2, Figure S3).
3.3. Plasma Metabolomics
A metabolomics analysis of the plasma samples was performed at 5 days and 2 weeks after the irradiation and comparisons were made with time- and sex-matched sham-irradiated controls. Raw data from the analysis are provided in Table S1. The analysis identified a total of 51 metabolites that were two-fold or more up-regulated or down-regulated at a p < 0.05 in the plasma of animals in one or more of the irradiation groups (Table S2). These metabolites may provide an indication of early post-irradiation metabolic changes in the hearts. Most of the significantly altered metabolites were identified at the day 5 time point. At this time point, all male irradiation groups showed a larger number of dysregulated metabolites than the females. A total of 12 metabolites were dysregulated in two irradiation groups or time points: epinephrine, glucosamine-6-phosphate, guanosine monophosphate, guanosine diphosphate, hippurate, homocysteic acid, 3-hydroxyisovaleric acid, 5-hydroxyl-indole-3-acetic acid, IDP, methylmalonate, succinate, and succinyl-CoA. One metabolite, L-ornithine, was upregulated in three irradiation groups (Table S2).
4. Discussion
Prior studies have investigated the effects of a partial heart irradiation on cardiac function in mouse models [14,15,16]. Ghita et al. showed more severe changes in cardiac function and structure as measured with echocardiography in C57BL/6J mice that were exposed to radiation to the base of the heart compared to the middle portion or the apex [14]. Lee et al. exposed a larger volume of the mouse heart to X-rays, in 25 fractions of 2 Gy, to mimic the tangential field RT in conventional fractions as in the clinic. This radiation protocol caused small changes in the cardiac function as measured with a pressure-volume loop method, mainly in ApoE−/− mice [15]. Dreyfuss et al. exposed the apex of the heart of C57BL/6 mice to high single doses of radiation and documented radiation-induced fibrosis in the irradiated portion of the heart [16]. All three studies were performed in female mice.
The current study investigated the histological changes and left ventricular expression of TLR4 in male and female C57BL/6J mice that were exposed to a single-dose whole heart irradiation, or the irradiation of only the bottom 40% of the heart. We found a small increase in the deposition of cardiac collagen in the whole heart-irradiated mice, but not after a 16 Gy partial heart exposure. This suggests that in mouse models of partial heart irradiation, high doses of radiation are needed to induce fibrosis [16]. Although 6 months is a common post-irradiation time point at which radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis is examined in rodent models, we cannot exclude that a difference in the collagen deposition would have become apparent at a longer follow-up time. Moreover, in the current study, we did not have the opportunity to measure cardiac function, which is a major limitation, since cardiac radiation fibrosis may not be directly related to changes in the cardiac function.
Within the first 30 days after high doses of radiation to the heart, the cardiac mast cell numbers decrease, while after about 30 days, the mast cell numbers tend to increase above the sham-irradiated controls [17,20]. Cardiac mast cells can play both pro- and anti-fibrotic roles in the heart [30]. While the exact role of the mast cells in radiation-induced heart disease is not yet known, prior studies in mast cell-deficient rats suggest that mast cells may play a predominantly protective role in radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis [31]. In this study, the cardiac mast cell numbers were assessed at 6 months after whole or partial heart irradiation. Therefore, the study design was not suited to determine whether radiation induced a decrease in the cardiac mast cell numbers within the first month, as seen in prior studies. Moreover, at 6 months, no radiation-induced increases in the cardiac mast cell counts were seen, suggesting that mild radiation fibrosis in the heart is not associated with a mast cell infiltration.
The metabolomics analysis of the plasma samples collected at 5 days and 2 weeks after irradiation provided indications of early post-irradiation metabolic changes in the heart. Some of the metabolites were found to be up- or down-regulated in multiple irradiation groups or time points. Of those metabolites, epinephrine is known to enhance the production of nitric oxide in the endothelium [32]. L-ornithine, which was up-regulated in the plasma of three radiation groups, may be an indication of the increased activity of the enzyme arginase, which cleaves L-arginine to form L-ornithine and release urea. The reduced availability of L-arginine may cause endothelial dysfunction [33]. However, in the current study, the plasma levels of L-arginine in irradiated female mice showed a modest 1.4–1.6-fold increase (p < 0.05) compared to sham-irradiated female controls at 2 weeks (Table S1). Homocysteic acid is one of the main agonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and may be involved in cardiac oxidative stress [34]. 5-hydroxyl-indole-3-acetic acid is a metabolite of serotonin and a potential biomarker of radiation injury [35]. Additional studies are required to determine whether plasma serotonin is an early marker of a radiation injury in the heart. Altered levels of guanosine monophosphate and guanosine diphosphate may be an indication of an altered energy requirement. Lastly, changes in succinate and succinyl-CoA may be an indication of an altered use of substrate in cardiac mitochondria, in line with our prior studies showing a decrease in succinate-driven state 2 respiration in mitochondria isolated from the irradiated rat heart [36].
Whether there are differences in the development of radiation-induced heart disease in males and females is largely unknown. While the number of mice per experimental group in this study was low, we saw no differences in the radiation-induced collagen deposition between male and female mice. On the other hand, at the day 5 time point, we identified a larger number of dysregulated metabolites in the plasma of irradiated males compared to females. Interestingly, TLR4 may be one of the inflammatory mediators that is differentially regulated in male and female subjects [37]. TLR4 recognizes bacterial and viral products, but also damaged self-tissue and plays a central role in inflammation in the heart [38]. Mast cells are among the immune cells that are regulated by TLR4 [39,40]. Further studies are required to understand radiation-induced inflammation in the heart, determine whether sex differences occur, and test whether TLR4 may be a target for intervention in radiation-induced heart disease.
5. Conclusions
This study shows early changes in plasma metabolites in mouse models of a whole heart and partial heart irradiation. The results obtained at 6 months after the irradiation suggest that adverse tissue remodeling may not only occur in the irradiated portion of the heart. While there was no indication of a difference between male and female mice in the cardiac collagen deposition or mast cell numbers, studies with larger numbers of animals per experimental group are required to study the sex effects in more detail.
Conceptualization, S.A.P. and M.B.; methodology, V.S., S.B., Y.L., A.K.C. and K.J.K.; validation, S.A.P. and M.B.; formal analysis, S.B., Y.L. and M.B.; investigation, V.S.; resources, S.A.P. and M.B.; data curation, S.B. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, V.S.; writing—review and editing, S.A.P., S.B. and M.B.; visualization, V.S.; supervision, M.B.; project administration, M.B.; funding acquisition, S.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (protocol code 3955, approved 16 October 2019 and TR202200000004, approved 16 September 2022).
Not applicable.
The data presented in this study are available as
This study depended on expert technical services from the Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute’s Experimental Pathology Shared Resource and Radiation Biology Shared Resource.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Cardiac histology 6 months after irradiation. Cardiac tissue area occupied by collagens was assessed (a) in the top half of the heart and (b) in the bottom half of the heart. Cardiac mast cell counts were determined (c) in the top of the heart and (d) in the bottom of the heart. Male and female data are combined, n = 8 animals per group. * p < 0.05 compared to 0 Gy.
Figure 2. Left ventricular protein levels of TLR4. Western blotting was performed on specimens of the left ventricle in the top part of the heart (a) and the bottom part of the heart (b). Male and female data are combined, n = 7–8 animals per group. * p < 0.05 compared to 0 Gy.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Database. Available online: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb (accessed on 15 October 2022).
2. Thompson, M.K.; Poortmans, P.; Chalmers, A.J.; Faivre-Finn, C.; Hall, E.; Huddart, R.A.; Lievens, Y.; Sebag-Montefiore, D.; Coles, C.E. Practice-changing radiation therapy trials for the treatment of cancer: Where are we 150 years after the birth of Marie Curie?. Br. J. Cancer; 2018; 119, pp. 389-407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0201-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061587]
3. Dess, R.T.; Sun, Y.; Matuszak, M.M.; Sun, G.; Soni, P.D.; Bazzi, L.; Murthy, V.L.; Hearn, J.W.D.; Kong, F.-M.; Kalemkerian, G.P. et al. Cardiac Events After Radiation Therapy: Combined Analysis of Prospective Multicenter Trials for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.; 2017; 35, pp. 1395-1402. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6142]
4. Hayashi, Y.; Iijima, H.; Isohashi, F.; Tsujii, Y.; Fujinaga, T.; Nagai, K.; Yoshii, S.; Sakatani, A.; Hiyama, S.; Shinzaki, S. et al. The heart’s exposure to radiation increases the risk of cardiac toxicity after chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer; 2019; 19, 195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5421-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832605]
5. Heidenreich, P.A.; Hancock, S.L.; Lee, B.K.; Mariscal, C.S.; Schnittger, I. Asymptomatic Cardiac Disease Following Mediastinal Irradiation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.; 2003; 2, pp. 743-749. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00759-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12932613]
6. Darby, S.C.; Ewertz, M.; McGale, P.; Bennet, A.M.; Blom-Goldman, U.; Brønnum, D.; Correa, C.; Cutter, D.; Gagliardi, G.; Gigante, B. et al. Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2013; 368, pp. 987-998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209825] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484825]
7. Stone, H.B.; Wong, R.S.; Capala, J.; Bernhard, E.J.; Vikram, B.; Coleman, C.N. Normal tissue protection for improving radiotherapy: Where are the gaps?. Transl. Cancer Res.; 2012; 1, pp. 35-48.
8. Schlaak, R.A.; SenthilKumar, G.; Boerma, M.; Bergom, C. Advances in preclinical research models of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity. Cancers; 2020; 12, 415. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020415] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053873]
9. Walls, G.M.; O’Kane, R.; Ghita, M.; Kuburas, R.; McGarry, C.K.; Cole, A.J.; Jain, S.; Butterworth, K.T. Murine models of radiation cardiotoxicity: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Radiother. Oncol.; 2022; 173, pp. 19-31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.030]
10. Bergom, C.; Bradley, J.A.; Ng, A.K.; Samson, P.; Robinson, C.; Lopez-Mattei, J.; Mitchell, J.D. Past, present, and future of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity: Refinements in targeting, surveillance, and risk stratification. JACC CardioOncol.; 2021; 3, pp. 343-359. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.06.007]
11. Kearney, M.; Keys, M.; Faivre-Finn, C.; Wang, A.; Aznar, M.C.; Duane, F. Exposure of the heart in lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of heart doses published during 2013–2020. Radiother. Oncol.; 2022; 172, pp. 118-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.007]
12. Gagliardi, G.; Lax, I.; Rutqvist, L.E. Partial irradiation of the heart. Semin. Radiat. Oncol.; 2001; 11, pp. 224-233. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/srao.2001.23483]
13. McWilliam, A.; Kennedy, J.; Hodgson, C.; Vasquez Osorio, E.; Faivre-Finn, C.; van Herk, M. Radiation dose to heart base linked to poor survival in lung cancer patients. Eur. J. Cancer; 2017; 85, pp. 106-113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.053] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28898766]
14. Ghita, M.; Gill, E.K.; Walls, G.M.; Edgar, K.S.; McMahon, S.J.; Osorio, E.V.; Bergom, C.; Grieve, D.J.; Watson, C.J.; McWilliam, A. et al. Cardiac sub-volume targeting demonstrates regional radiosensitivity in the mouse heart. Radiother. Oncol.; 2020; 152, pp. 216-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.016]
15. Lee, C.L.; Lee, J.W.; Daniel, A.R.; Holbrook, M.; Hasapis, S.; Wright, A.O.; Brownstein, J.; Da Silva Campos, L.; Ma, Y.; Mao, L. et al. Characterization of cardiovascular injury in mice following partial-heart irradiation with clinically relevant dose and fractionation. Radiother. Oncol.; 2021; 157, pp. 155-162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.023]
16. Dreyfuss, A.D.; Goia, D.; Shoniyozov, K.; Shewale, S.V.; Velalopoulou, A.; Mazzoni, S.; Avgousti, H.; Metzler, S.D.; Bravo, P.E.; Feigenberg, S.J. et al. A novel mouse model of radiation-induced cardiac injury reveals biological and radiological biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction with potential clinical relevance. Clin. Cancer Res.; 2021; 27, pp. 2266-2276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3882] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542079]
17. Boerma, M.; Zurcher, C.; Esveldt, I.; Schutte-Bart, C.I.; Wondergem, J. Histopathology of ventricles, coronary arteries and mast cell accumulation in transverse and longitudinal sections of the rat heart after irradiation. Oncol. Rep.; 2004; 12, pp. 213-219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.12.2.213]
18. Yarom, R.; Harper, I.S.; Wynchank, S.; van Schalkwyk, D.; Madhoo, J.; Williams, K.; Salie, R.; Genade, S.; Lochner, A. Effect of captopril on changes in rats’ hearts induced by long-term irradiation. Radiat. Res.; 1993; 133, pp. 187-197. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3578356]
19. Schlaak, R.A.; Frei, A.; Schottstaedt, A.M.; Tsaih, S.-W.; Fish, B.L.; Harmann, L.; Liu, Q.; Gasperetti, T.; Medhora, M.; North, P.E. et al. Mapping genetic modifiers of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity to rat chromosome 3. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.; 2019; 316, pp. H1267-H1280. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00482.2018]
20. Forsgren, K.S.; Cavén, A.G.; Hansson, M.C.; Larsson, F.H.; Kjörell, U.K.; Henriksson, R.G.; Franzén, L.I. Irradiation-induced effects on mast cells, neuropeptides, and atrial natriuretic peptide in the rat heart and lung: Bases for further studies. Cancer Detec. Prev.; 2001; 25, pp. 80-92.
21. Yu, L.; Feng, Z. The role of Toll-like receptor signaling in the progression of heart failure. Mediators Inflamm.; 2018; 2018, 9874109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9874109] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576748]
22. Becher, P.M.; Hinrichs, S.; Fluschnik, N.; Hennigs, J.K.; Klingel, K.; Blankenberg, S.; Westermann, D.; Lindner, D. Role of Toll-like receptors and interferon regulatory factors in different experimental heart failure models of diverse etiology: IRF7 as novel cardiovascular stress-inducible factor. PLoS ONE; 2018; 13, e0193844. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193844] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538462]
23. Frantz, S.; Kobzik, L.; Kim, Y.D.; Fukazawa, R.; Medzhitov, R.; Lee, R.T.; Kelly, R.A. Toll4 (TLR4) expression in cardiac myocytes in normal and failing myocardium. J. Clin. Investig.; 1999; 104, pp. 271-280. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI6709] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10430608]
24. Tavener, S.A.; Long, E.M.; Robbins, S.M.; McRae, K.M.; Van, R.H.; Kubes, P. Immune cell Toll-like receptor 4 is required for cardiac myocyte impairment during endotoxemia. Circ. Res.; 2004; 95, pp. 700-707. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000144175.70140.8c]
25. Avlas, O.; Bragg, A.; Fuks, A.; Nicholson, J.D.; Farkash, A.; Porat, E.; Aravot, D.; Levy-Drummer, R.S.; Cohen, C.; Shainberg, A. et al. TLR4 Expression Is Associated with Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. PLoS ONE; 2015; 10, e0120175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120175]
26. Qiao, F.; Andrade, M.V.; Lisboa, F.A.; Morgan, K.; Beaven, M.A. FcepsilonR1 and toll-like receptors mediate synergistic signals to markedly augment production of inflammatory cytokines in murine mast cells. Blood; 2006; 107, pp. 610-618. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-06-2271]
27. Zhang, X.; Lu, C.; Gao, M.; Cao, X.; Ha, T.; Kalbfleisch, J.H.; Williams, D.L.; Li, C.; Kao, R.L. Toll-like receptor 4 plays a central role in cardiac dysfunction during trauma hemorrhage shock. Shock; 2014; 42, pp. 31-37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000155] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24569510]
28. Yao, Q.; The, E.; Ao, L.; Zhai, Y.; Osterholt, M.K.; Fullerton, D.A.; Meng, X. TLR4 stimulation promotes human AVIC fibrogenic activity through upregulation of neurotrophin 3 production. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 1276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041276] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32074942]
29. Ma, Y.; Zhang, X.; Bao, H.; Mi, S.; Cai, W.; Yan, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Yan, J.; Fan, G.-C. et al. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 differentially regulate doxorubicin induced cardiomyopathy in mice. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e40763. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/annotation/e82f77a8-3d29-44be-a9ef-7abc6c7e584a]
30. Jin, J.; Jian, Y.; Chakrabarti, S.; Su, Z. Cardiac Mast Cells: A Two-Head Regulator in Cardiac Homeostasis and Pathogenesis Following Injury. Front. Immunol.; 2022; 13, 963444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.963444]
31. Boerma, M.; Wang, J.; Wondergem, J.; Joseph, J.; Qiu, X.; Kennedy, R.H.; Hauer-Jensen, M. Influence of mast cells on structural and functional manifestations of radiation-induced heart disease. Cancer Res.; 2005; 65, pp. 3100-3107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4333]
32. Figueroa, X.F.; Poblete, I.; Fernández, R.; Pedemonte, C.; Cortés, V.; Huidobro-Toro, J.P. NO production and eNOS phosphorylation induced by epinephrine through the activation of beta-adrenoreceptors. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.; 2009; 297, pp. H134-H143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00023.2009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19429833]
33. Heuser, S.P.; LoBue, A.; Li, J.; Zhuge, Z.; Leo, F.; Suvorava, T.; Olsson, A.; Schneckmann, R.; Guimaraes Braga, D.D.; Srivrastava, T. et al. Downregulation of eNOS and preserved endothelial function in endothelial-specific arginase 1-deficient mice. Nitic Oxide; 2022; 125–126, pp. 69-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2022.06.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35752264]
34. McGee, M.A.; Abdel-Rahman, A.A. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor signaling and function in cardiovascular tissues. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.; 2016; 86, pp. 97-105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000000398] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27046337]
35. Kumar, P.; Wang, P.; Farese, A.M.; MacVittie, T.J.; Kane, M.A. Metabolomics of multiorgan radiation injury in non-human primate model reveals system-wide metabolic perturbations. Health Phys.; 2021; 121, pp. 395-405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001472] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34546220]
36. Sridharan, V.; Aykin-Burns, N.; Tripathi, P.; Krager, K.J.; Sharma, S.K.; Moros, E.G.; Corry, P.M.; Nowak, G.; Hauer-Jensen, M.; Boerma, M. Radiation-induced alterations in mitochondria of the rat heart. Radiat. Res.; 2014; 181, pp. 324-334. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR13452.1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24568130]
37. Di Florio, D.N.; Sin, J.; Coronado, M.J.; Atwal, P.S.; Fairweather, D. Sex differences in inflammation, redox biology, mitochondria and autoimmunity. Redox Biol.; 2020; 31, 101482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101482]
38. Yang, Y.; Lv, J.; Jiang, S.; Ma, Z.; Wang, D.; Hu, W.; Deng, C.; Fan, C.; Di, S.; Sun, Y. et al. The emerging role of Toll-like receptor 4 in myocardial inflammation. Cell Death Dis.; 2016; 7, e2234. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.140]
39. Espinosa-Riquer, Z.P.; Ibarra-Sánchez, A.; Vibhusan, S.; Bratti, M.; Charles, N.; Blank, U.; Rodríguez-Manzo, G.; González-Espinosa, C. TLR4 receptor induces 2-AG-dependent tolerance to lipopolysaccharide and trafficking of CB2 receptor in mast cells. J. Immunol.; 2019; 202, pp. 2360-2371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800997]
40. Pietrzak, A.; Wierzbicki, M.; Wiktorska, M.; Brzezinska-Blaszczyk, E. Surface TLR2 and TLR4 expression on mature rat mast cells can be affected by some bacterial components and proinflammatory cytokines. Mediators Inflamm.; 2011; 2011, 427473. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/427473]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Simple Summary
In radiation therapy of tumors in the chest, such as in lung or esophageal cancer, part of the heart may be situated in the radiation field. This can lead to the development of radiation-induced heart disease. The mechanisms by which radiation causes a long-term injury to the heart are not fully understood, but investigations in pre-clinical research models can contribute to mechanistic insights. To model partial heart irradiation as it may occur in patients, in this study, adult male and female mice were exposed to irradiation to only 40% of the heart. Mice exposed to a whole heart irradiation were used for comparison. While plasma samples at 5 days and 2 weeks after the irradiation showed different metabolite profiles, we found no differences in the tissue structural changes between the irradiated and unirradiated portions of the heart at 6 months. Additional work in larger animal cohorts is required to determine whether there are differences between the two sexes.
AbstractIn radiation therapy of tumors in the chest, such as in lung or esophageal cancer, part of the heart may be situated in the radiation field. This can lead to the development of radiation-induced heart disease. The mechanisms by which radiation causes long-term injury to the heart are not fully understood, but investigations in pre-clinical research models can contribute to mechanistic insights. Recent developments in X-ray technology have enabled partial heart irradiation in mouse models. In this study, adult male and female C57BL/6J mice were exposed to whole heart (a single dose of 8 or 16 Gy) and partial heart irradiation (16 Gy to 40% of the heart). Plasma samples were collected at 5 days and 2 weeks after the irradiation for metabolomics analysis, and the cardiac collagen deposition, mast cell numbers, and left ventricular expression of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) were examined in the irradiated and unirradiated parts of the heart at 6 months after the irradiation. Small differences were found in the plasma metabolite profiles between the groups. However, the collagen deposition did not differ between the irradiated and unirradiated parts of the heart, and radiation did not upregulate the mast cell numbers in either part of the heart. Lastly, an increase in the expression of TLR4 was seen only after a single dose of 8 Gy to the whole heart. These results suggest that adverse tissue remodeling was not different between the irradiated and unirradiated portions of the mouse heart. While there were no clear differences between male and female animals, additional work in larger cohorts may be required to confirm this result, and to test the inhibition of TLR4 as an intervention strategy in radiation-induced heart disease.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Division of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Upstate Cancer Center, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA