1. Introduction
The 2nd edition of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAG) recommends 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity and two days of muscle strengthening each week to promote health for those 18 years of age and older [1]. In addition, balance practices are recommended for those 65 years of age and older. Approximately 25% of adults are meeting the current PAG [2]. Yoga is a multicomponent activity that includes balance, muscle strengthening, and aerobic components [1,3] and has been associated with positive psychological and physiological benefits [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. When yoga was compared with physical activity, as pertaining to health-related quality of life, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Patel et al. found that yoga was superior to traditional forms of physical activity (e.g., walking, running) for older adults [12]. The most recent Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report [13] suggested further studies regarding the benefits of yoga for adults.
Some of the reasons the PAG was unable to conclude that all yoga can help meet the recommendations include (1) the practice of yoga has a variety of different aspects and meanings based on the lineage from which the yoga practitioner comes [5,9,11]; (2) few studies have been conducted on yoga and its relative intensity, or ability to meet the PAG [14]; (3) existing studies have focused on young, healthy participants in metropolitan areas who are fairly experienced with yoga [14]; and (4) research designs have yet to parse out mechanisms of the exercise impact of yoga versus the temperature of the room or experience level affecting heart rate. Notably, a reductionist approach to the physical activity component of yoga is controversial, as yoga is a multifaceted mind–body practice with ancient roots related to yuj (union) with self and the divine. Yoga, as a spiritual and cultural practice, has never been about physical mastery of postures [15], so much research has been done regarding stress reduction [5,11,16], worry and anxiety [10], but less research has specifically looked at yoga as a way to get aerobic physical activity in addition to its other benefits. Furthermore, data collection on older adults, as well as those who may be less experienced with yoga, and the PAG has been limited [14]. While yoga is not solely a physical practice, being able to meet some of the PAG through yoga might help engage public interest in yoga, especially for older adults.
While some research suggests that yoga does not reach moderate aerobic activity [3,14,16], weaknesses in these studies relate to the short duration of the sessions (15–20 min compared with 60-min classes typically available in studios) [3,14,16], as well as the fact that the sessions were led by video (which might lead to less engaged participation)3 and, finally, the postures were repetitive and included a number of supine and seated postures [3,14,17]. A yoga study with 6 weekly high-intensity yoga sessions (30–40 min of sun salutations followed by 15 min of other poses) with ‘additional home training’ found no improvement in cardiovascular fitness when tested through a Cooper running test [18]. The rate of perceived exertion (RPE) during sessions was on average 14, which is within the cardiovascular training range, but heart rate was not monitored during these study sessions [18].
In contrast, and in favor of the potential of yoga classes for meeting moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), multiple studies that had more dynamic flows (sequences) and longer sessions found improvements in a 6-min walk test [19] and heart rate and exertion [20]. A study looking at power yoga, heart rate, skin temperature, and body mass determined that power yoga could be considered a moderate–vigorous-intensity activity with 45-min sessions [21].
Despite these existing studies and calls to action, there is a gap in the research on understanding the intensity of exercise offered within a typical yoga studio including “flow,” Hatha/classical, and hot yoga. Most community yoga classes are about 60 min in length [3,14], and yoga classes of that length and in a more pragmatic setting have not been thoroughly investigated [14]. There is also minimal research performed on whether wearable activity trackers and accelerometers are able to accurately assess heart rate or movement, and therefore activity intensity level, in a yoga setting. Making a connection between yoga participants of all ages and backgrounds and common fitness tracking technology is important to help a broader population feel empowered to engage in more physical activity.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test four hypotheses: a typical yoga class offered in a community setting will get participants into a moderate heart rate zone for at least some portion of the class (H1); individuals who are not meeting PAG aerobic recommendations at baseline will have a higher heart rate during some of the yoga asana (physical yoga practice) (H2); warmer temperatures will result in higher RPE (H3); and faster tempos will result in higher reported RPE (H4).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Recruitment
Subjects were primarily recruited through a local yoga studio (In Balance Yoga) in Blacksburg, Virginia, via posted flyers, class announcements, and the studio newsletter. Recruitment was also conducted over Twitter and email listservs. Approved flyers were posted on the Virginia Tech campus and at local community centers, faith-based organizations, and gathering places. Participants completed the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire Plus (PAR-Q+) [22] as a screening tool to join the study, and if the PAR-Q+ score indicated that it was safe for them to participate in physical activity, they were sent the consent form and survey. If the PAR-Q+ indicated a need for further screening, the ePARmed-X+ [23], which is an additional, more detailed screening tool for physical activity, was completed. If they were not indicated as safe for physical activity based on their responses to the PAR-Q+ and/or ePARmed-X+, they were not eligible for the study and were informed of their noneligibility.
2.2. Orientation and Equipment
Participants attended an orientation session via Zoom that detailed information and study protocols for participants. This included a brief overview of how to wear a heart rate monitor and the foundations of the asanas (postures). The recording was available for those who could not attend live via Zoom. They were randomly assigned to intervention arms (see Table 1) and then informed of their times/days when they picked up their equipment. Participants were given Polar Verity Sense heart rate monitors based on previous yoga studies and validation [21], The Polar Verity Sense is the newer version of the Polar OH1, with increased Bluetooth range and longer battery life.
2.3. Study Interventions
Participants were requested to complete a survey on their current activity level (utilizing the Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical (L-CAT) item) [24] and familiarity with yoga (utilizing the Yoga Self-Efficacy Scale) [25].
The yoga sequence for each class was standardized between sessions and crafted by two registered yoga teachers to match a typical yoga class, containing breathing practice, warm-up, conditioning, and cool-down postures with many of the same postures utilized in previous studies [3,21] (see Appendix A: Table A1). Yoga sessions were led by the same 500-h registered yoga teacher, wearing the same outfit and using the same playlist. This reduces the risk for injury due to the extensive training the yoga teacher has received and his or her knowledge of cuing and sequencing for best practice while attempting to control as many implementation factors as possible. The Hatha classes held each pose for five breaths while the flow class held approximately one breath per movement (i.e., continuous flow from posture to posture) and repeated the sequence twice. Sessions were Hatha thermo-neutral, flow thermo-neutral, Hatha hot, and flow hot yoga (see Table 1). During the 60-min yoga sessions, participants and the instructor wore the heart rate monitors.
To assess during- and after-class rate of perceived exertion (RPE), participants were asked to rate their exertion level (on a sheet of paper that was placed by their mat) using a scale of 1–10, with 1 being ‘very light activity’ to 10 being ‘maximum effort’. The modified version of the original Borg RPE has been shown to be highly correlated to the original and still shows exercise intensity [26], while also possibly being more familiar to participants who have seen it used by group fitness personnel [27] or in the medical field [28].
2.4. Statistical Analysis
After all four sessions were completed, data from the heart rate monitors was assessed using SPSS, version 26 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) to determine the time each participant spent in each intensity zone, based on their age-predicted max heart rate using the adjusted Tanaka, et al., equation (208 − 0.7 × age) [29]. Each intensity zone was defined based on the following definitions: light <60% maximum heart rate, moderate 60–75% maximum heart rate, vigorous 76–90% maximum heart rate, and near maximal >90% maximum heart rate [1]. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine differences in sessions.
The RPE of each class was assessed by averaging the participants’ answers and using independent t-tests to examine the differences between age groups. The RPE of each participant was also compared to the data from their heart rate monitor for differences in perceived exertion versus heart rate.
3. Results
3.1. Sample
A total of 21 participants (9 of whom (43%) were 65+ years of age) were recruited for the study. The mean age was 48.1 ± 21.82 years with a range of 19–74 years. Sixteen participants completed all 4 types classes, with the other 5 participants completing 2–3 of the 4 classes. Due to unforeseen issues with the heart rate monitors, data were collected from 9 participants for the hot Vinyasa–style classes, 11 participants for the room-temperature Vinyasa and hot Hatha classes, and 14 participants for the room-temperature Hatha classes. Only 3 participants had personal wearable activity trackers. Data were obtained from all 3 for the room-temperature Hatha class, from 2 participants for the room-temperature Vinyasa and hot Vinyasa classes, and from 1 participant for the hot Hatha class. Further demographic information is in Table 2.
3.2. MVPA
When looking at all participants and all class types on the basis of heart rate data, there was an average of 32.75% MVPA within the approximately 60-min classes. By condition, this was 38.57% (±24.54%) for Vinyasa hot, 34.45% (±32.67%) for Hatha hot, 40.55% (±29.09%) for Vinyasa thermo-neutral, and 24.93% (±28.63%) for Hatha thermo-neutral. Notably, 2 participants did not meet MVPA for any duration of the room-temperature Hatha class, and only 1 participant did not meet MVPA at any time during the other three class types. However, every participant reached MVPA in at least one of the classes. Using the independent samples t-test, age was a significant factor in time spent in MVPA for only the thermo-neutral Hatha classes, in that those who were older were more likely to be in higher heart rate zones (p = 0.010). Tempo, temperature, and baseline activity levels were not significant factors in time spent in MVPA based on the Kruskal–Wallis test, see Figure 1. See Table 3 for specific class information.
3.3. RPE
The midpoint RPE was on average within the moderate intensity range (5.8 (1.8)), with no significant differences in RPE reports by younger and older adult (p > 0.05). For the end-of-class RPE, participants who were over 65 reported significantly higher RPE when compared with their younger counterparts (p < 0.05) after every session.
4. Discussion
This study was able to demonstrate among a small number of diverse participants that all individuals achieved a moderate- or vigorous-intensity heart rate zone during at least one of these yoga sessions, regardless of tempo or temperature. However, although not significant, the percent of time in MVPA trended in the hypothesized direction with hotter and faster classes having more time in MVPA than the Hatha thermo-neutral class. This provides preliminary evidence that regardless of age, tempo, temperature, or baseline physical activity level, a typical yoga class can contribute to the 150 min of MVPA recommended per week, especially since the 2nd edition of the PAG removed the requirement for MVPA to be performed in 10-min increments [1].
These data are in agreement with those of other studies [19,20] that were conducted focusing on yoga classes that were more similar to community-based yoga classes (i.e., longer duration [16] and led by a live instructor). These heart rate data are also in agreement with the subjective RPE data that were, on average, in the moderate-intensity range of perceived exertion. More research utilizing both RPE data and data from other activity trackers commonly found in community-based yoga classes, such as FitBits and Apple Watches, is needed.
Additionally, many participants choose hot and/or flow classes when a studio offers a variety of classes [6]. Unlike in previous studies [13], the participants recruited for our study had a variety of levels of experience with yoga, many being new to the practice. This is also more similar to a community-based yoga class that participants might attend with a mixture of regular yoga practitioners and nonregular practitioners. However, in a study that looked at Bikram yoga, a hot style yoga, it was found that participants with more yoga experience had higher heart rates [30]. Future studies may look at creating sessions with experienced and novice yoga practitioners together and in separate classes to see how changing the demographics of the class affects participants’ heart rates.
In keeping with the community-based class framework, and varying from the methods of previous studies [3,21], participants were not instructed to avoid physical activity on the days that they were attending sessions. Some participants ran or rode their bike to class, which may have affected their heart rates, particularly during the beginning of class. However, this reflected their normal physical activity levels, as one participant’s only form of transportation was bike riding. Future research looking into the effects of daily physical activity, medicines, and other factors on heart rate during yoga is needed.
Spreading the four classes over 2 weeks helped prevent mental and physical fatigue in the yoga instructor. Additionally, having multiple class styles that each participant attends within the research study is novel in that many previous studies have looked at the energy expenditure or heart rate data of participants after having attended only one yoga session or one style of yoga [3,14,21,30]. Future research into the physical and mental demands of instructing yoga classes would be appropriate, as yoga teachers may instruct multiple classes per day or per week. The spread of classes may have been a negative in getting participants to be available for all four sessions. Participants who missed sessions had their data removed from the between-session comparisons, but the data for each session were also analyzed on a session-by-session basis.
Many previous yoga studies have been limited by lack of demographic diversity [3,14,16]. Care was taken in the recruitment materials and placement of recruitment flyers for this study to be welcoming to participants of all genders and ethnicities. The participant demographics reflect the community from which participants were recruited for this study [7]. Due to equipment and COVID restrictions, cohort sizes were kept small. A larger participant pool might bring in a greater diversity among participants.
5. Conclusions
Based on the heart rate and RPE data, the time adults and older adults spend in MVPA within a typical Hatha or Vinyasa yoga class can be helpful in meeting the PAG guidelines, with some participants meeting as much as one-third of the recommended 150 min of MVPA in a single class. While the entirety of the class is unlikely to meet MVPA, knowing that yoga may contribute to reaching the PAG guidelines may encourage the promotion of yoga as exercise by healthcare providers and public health workers. This study will help build the body of evidence for yoga to be used and recommended as a way to help meet the aerobic activity components of the PAG.
Conceptualization, A.D. and S.M.H.; methodology, A.D. and S.M.H.; formal analysis, A.D. and S.M.H.; resources, S.M.H.; data curation, A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.; writing—review and editing, S.M.H.; funding acquisition, S.M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Virginia Tech, protocol code 21-325 and approved 28 May 2021.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data are available from the authors upon request.
Thank you to the participants, In Balance Yoga Studio for providing the space to conduct the study, and the undergraduate researchers, Nicole Botha and Jon Dotson, for help during the study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Kruskal–Wallis Box Plot for Differences Between Classes. Outlier denoted by °.
Yoga Class Sessions Descriptors.
| Hatha Thermo-Neutral | Flow Thermo-Neutral | Hatha Hot | Flow Hot | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 78 °F | 78 °F | 92 °F | 92 °F |
| Cadence | 5 breaths per posture | 1 breath per posture | 5 breaths per posture | 1 breath per posture |
| Set sequence (See |
Complete Set 2 twice |
Complete Set 3 3 times |
Complete Set 3 3 times |
Complete Set 2 twiceComplete Set 3 once on each side |
| Opening pranayama (breath work) | Guided equal parts breathing in standing mountain pose (Sama Vritti in Tadasana) for 2 min | |||
| Savasana | 5 min | |||
Complete flow sequence be found in
Study participant demographics.
| Study Participant Demographics (n = 21) | |
|---|---|
| Age, M(SD) | 48.1 (21.82) |
| Sex, n (%) |
|
| Ethnicity, n (%) |
|
| Physical Activity Level, n (%) |
|
| Regular Yoga Practitioner |
|
Percent Time in MVPA and RPE Results for Each Class.
| Hatha Thermo-Neutral | Vinyasa Thermo-Neutral | Hatha Hot | Vinyasa Hot | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg % Time in MVPA (by HR) | ||||
| All M(SD) | 24.93 (28.63) |
40.55 (29.09) |
34.45 (32.67) |
38.57 (24.54) |
| <65 M(SD) | 22.61 (14.56) |
34.95 (27.11) |
38.65 (37.55) |
44.93 (22.33) |
| ≥65 M(SD) | 31.59 (40.95) |
40.48 (36.75) |
24.85 (27.42) |
16.58 (23.45) |
| Avg RPE Mid-Session | ||||
| All | 5.2 (n = 20) | 6.2 (n = 20) | 6.4 (n = 18) | 6.2 (n = 19) |
| <65 | 3.4 (n = 11) | 4.4 (n = 11) | 4.5 (n = 10) | 4.9 (n = 11) |
| ≥65 | 5.4 (n = 9) | 6.1 (n = 9) | 5.9 (n = 8) | 6.2 (n = 8) |
| Avg RPE Session End | ||||
| All | 3.3 (n = 20) | 3.1 (n = 20) | 3.5 (n = 18) | 4.0 (n = 19) |
| <65 | 1.5 (n = 11) | 1.4 (n = 11) | 2.1 (n = 11) | 1.9 (n = 11) |
| ≥65 | 3.6 (n = 9) | 3.3 (n = 9) | 3.6 (n = 8) | 4.8 (n = 8) |
Bold denotes a significant difference between older adults and younger adults.
Appendix A
Yoga Sequence.
| Pose | Sanskrit Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | ||
| Mountain | Tadasana | Standing tall, feet underneath the hips |
| Lateral Raise, hand over head right side | Right hand over head, leaning to the left | |
| Lateral Raise, hand over head left side | Left hand over head, leaning to the right | |
| Standing Twist right side | Gentle twist through the spine, looking right | |
| Standing Twist left side | Gentle twist through the spine, looking left | |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | Hinge at the hips, crown of the head reaching towards the floor. Could be supported with hands on the legs. |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | Palms flat on the floor, hips/tailbone pointed up towards the ceiling, feet hip distance apart |
| Tabletop | Bharmanasana | All fours position on hands and knees |
| Cat | Marjaryasana | All fours position on hands and knees, with shoulder blades separated and back arched |
| Cow | Bitilasana | All fours position on hands and knees, with ribs dropping down towards the floor and crown of the head up towards the ceiling |
| Spinal Balance | Dandayamana Bharmanasana | From tabletop, the opposite hand and foot reach out, keeping the hips and shoulders level with the floor |
| Tabletop | Bharmanasana | |
| Childs Pose | Balasana | Knees wider than hip distance apart, big toes together, sink the hips back over the heels |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Plank | Phalakasana | Hands underneath the shoulders, spine long and core engaged. Can be on knees or with legs lengthened |
| Low plank | Chaturanga Dandasana | Hands underneath the shoulders, elbows point to the back of the room, and chest is lowering towards the floor. |
| Cobra | Bhujangasana | From low plank, crown of the head reaching up towards the ceiling, hips down on the floor, spine is lengthening |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Set 2 | ||
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Chair | Utkatasana | Hips sinking back and down, chest lifted, as if you were sitting into a chair |
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Lunge | Ashta Chandrasana | Front thigh parallel to the floor, back leg extended long (heel lifted) with torso upright |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Plank | Phalakasana | |
| Low plank | Chaturanga Dandasana | |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Lunge | Ashta Chandrasana | |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Set 3 | ||
| Warrior 1 | Virabhadrasana 1 | Front thigh parallel to the floor, back leg extended long (heel down) with torso upright and hips/shoulders square to the front |
| Warrior 2 | Virabhadrasana 2 | Front thigh parallel to the floor, back leg extended long (heel down) with torso upright and hips/shoulders square to the side |
| Extended Side Angle | Utthita Parsvakonasana) | Front thigh parallel to the floor, back leg extended long (heel down) with torso on the diagonal, forearm supporting the torso by resting on the front thigh |
| Reverse Warrior | Viparita Virabahadrasana | Front thigh parallel to the floor, back leg extended long (heel down), front arm is lifting up towards the ceiling and gaze is up towards the ceiling |
| Lunge | Ashta Chandrasana | |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Plank | Phalakasana | |
| Low plank | Chaturanga Dandasana | |
| Upward Facing Dog | ||
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Set 4 | ||
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Pyramid Right Side | Parsvottasana | Feet are a stride‘s distance apart, hinge at the hips with the spine long. Can be supported with hands on the front leg. |
| Warrior 3 Right Side | Virabhadrasana 3 | Weight in one foot, opposite foot lifted and pressing towards the back wall. Torso parallel to the floor. |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Pyramid Left Side | Parsvottasana | |
| Warrior 3 Left Side | Virabhadrasana 3 | |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Eagle, Right Side | Garudasana | Standing on one leg, opposite leg crossed over. Arms are crossed, one elbow below the other and forearms wrapped around so palms are touching |
| Eagle, Left Side | Garudasana | |
| Mountain | Tadasana | |
| Forward Fold | Uttanasana | |
| Downward Facing Dog | Adho Muka Svanasana | |
| Tabletop | Bharmanasana | |
| Reverse Tabletop | Ardha Purvottanasana | Feet flat on the floor, hands underneath shoulders, gaze up towards the ceiling. Hips lifted up off the floor. |
| Boat | Navasana | Balancing on buttocks in a v-shaped position, with torso and legs lifted on the diagonal |
| Butterfly | Baddha Konasana | Seated posture with soles of the feet together, knees falling open towards the floor |
| Revolving Head to Knee, Right Side | Parivrtta Janu Sirsa | Right leg extended, left leg bent in with left foot on the right inner thigh. Left hand reaches up and over towards the right toes |
| Revolving Head to Knee, Left Side | Parivrtta Janu Sirsa | Left leg extended, right leg bent in with right foot on the left inner thigh. Right hand reaches up and over towards the right toes |
| Supine Figure 4/ Cradle the Baby, Right side | Supta eka pada galavasana | Lying on the back, left leg extended towards the ceiling, right ankle crossing the left thigh. Legs look like a number “4” |
| Supine Figure 4/ Cradle the Baby, Left side | Supta eka pada galavasana | Lying on the back, right leg extended towards the ceiling, left ankle crossing the right thigh. Legs look like a number “4” |
| Supine Spinal Twist, Right Side | Supta Matsyendrasana I | Lying on the back, shoulder blades stay pressed into the floor as the knees twist over to right |
| Supine Spinal Twist, Left Side | Supta Matsyendrasana I | Lying on the back, shoulder blades stay pressed into the floor as the knees twist over to left |
| Final Relaxation | Savasana | Typically lying flat on the back, legs extended and arms by the side. |
| Lay on side, transition to- | ||
| Easy Seated Pose | Sukhasana | Seated on the floor, legs crossed |
References
1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans; 2nd ed. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
2. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Physical Activity, Healthy People 2030. Available online: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/physical-activity#cit1. (accessed on 11 November 2021).
3. Clay, C.C.; Lloyd, L.K.; Walker, J.L.; Sharp, K.R.; Pankey, R.B. The metabolic cost of hatha yoga. J. Strength Cond. Res.; 2005; 19, pp. 604-610. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16095417]
4. Sullivan, M.B.; Erb, M.; Schmalzl, L.; Moonaz, S.; Noggle Taylor, J.; Porges, S.W. Yoga Therapy and Polyvagal Theory: The Convergence of Traditional Wisdom and Contemporary Neuroscience for Self-Regulation and Resilience. Front. Hum. Neurosci.; 2018; 12, 67. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00067] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535617]
5. Smith, B.L.M.; Esat, G. Yoga Kernels: A Public Health Model for Developing and Disseminating Evidence-Based Yoga Practices. Int. J. Yoga Ther.; 2019; 29, pp. 119-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17761/2019-00024] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30354906]
6. Roland, K.; Jakobi, J.; Jones, G. Does Yoga Engender Fitness in Older Adults? A Critical Review. J. Aging Phys. Act.; 2011; 19, pp. 62-79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.19.1.62] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21285476]
7. Harden, S.M.; Steketee, A.M.; Kelliher, R.; Mason, K.A.; Fitzwater Boyle, N. Using a Studio-Academic Partnership to Advance Public Health within a Pragmatic Yoga Setting. J. Prim. Care Community Health; 2019; 10, 2150132719874621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719874621]
8. Hamrick, I.; Mross, P.; Christopher, N.; Smith, P. Yoga’s Effect on Falls in Rural, Older Adults. Complement. Ther. Med.; 2017; 35, pp. 57-63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.09.007]
9. Elwy, A.R.; Groessl, E.J.; Eisen, S.V.; Riley, K.E.; Maiya, M.; Lee, J.P.; Sarkin, A.; Park, C.L. A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality. Am. J. Prev. Med.; 2014; 47, pp. 220-232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.012]
10. Brenes, G.; Diver, J.; Miller, M.; Danhauer, S. A Randomized Preference Trial of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Yoga for the Treatment of Worry in Anxious Older Adults. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun.; 2018; 10, pp. 169-176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.05.002]
11. Brems, C. A Yoga Stress Reduction Intervention for University Faculty, Staff, and Graduate Students. Int. J. Yoga; 2015; 25, pp. 61-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17761/1531-2054-25.1.61]
12. Patel, N.K.; Newstead, A.H.; Ferrer, R.L. The effects of yoga on physical functioning and health related quality of life in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Altern. Complement. Med.; 2012; 18, pp. 902-917. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2011.0473]
13. Committee Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report; DoHaH. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
14. Larson-Meyer, D.E. A Systematic Review of the Energy Cost and Metabolic Intensity of Yoga. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.; 2016; 48, pp. 1558-1569. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000922]
15. Barkataki, S. Yoga Alliance Standards Review Project. Available online: https://yastandards.com/susanna-barkataki/. (accessed on 12 June 2020).
16. Boyd, C.N.; Lannan, S.M.; Zuhl, M.N.; Mora-Rodriguez, R.; Nelson, R.K. Objective and subjective measures of exercise intensity during thermo-neutral and hot yoga. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.; 2018; 43, pp. 397-402. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0495]
17. Sherman, S.A.; Rogers, R.J.; Jakicic, J.M. Yoga for Health: Considerations beyond Energy Cost and Isolated Asanas (Poses). Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.; 2017; 49, 859.
18. Papp, M.E.; Lindfors, P.; Nygren-Bonnier, M.; Gullstrand, L.; Wändell, P.E. Effects of High-Intensity Hatha Yoga on Cardiovascular Fitness, Adipocytokines, and Apolipoproteins in Healthy Students: A Randomized Controlled Study. J. Altern. Complement. Med.; 2016; 22, pp. 81-87. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2015.0082]
19. Akhtar, P.; Yardi, S.; Akhtar, M. Effects of yoga on functional capacity and well being. Int. J. Yoga; 2013; 6, pp. 76-79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.105952]
20. Sherman, S.A.; Rogers, R.J.; Davis, K.K.; Minster, R.L.; Creasy, S.A.; Mullarkey, N.C.; O’Dell, M.; Donahue, P.; Jakicic, J.M. Energy Expenditure in Vinyasa Yoga Versus Walking. J. Phys. Act. Health; 2017; 14, pp. 597-605. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0548]
21. Schubert, M.M.; Clark, A.S.; De La Rosa, A.B.; Newcomer, S.C. Heart rate and thermal responses to power yoga. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract.; 2018; 32, pp. 195-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.07.003]
22. Warburton, D.E.R.; Bredin, S.S.D.; Jamnik, V.K.; Gledhill, N. Validation of the PAR-Q+ and ePARmed-X+. Health Fit. J. Can.; 2011; 4, pp. 38-46.
23. Warburton, D.; Jamnik, V.; Bredin, S.S.D.; Gledhill, N. The ePARmed-X+ Physician Clearance Follow-up. Health Fit. J. Can.; 2014; 7, pp. 35-38.
24. Ross, K.M.; Leahey, T.M.; Kiernan, M. Validation of the Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat) Using Armband Activity Monitor Data. Obes. Sci. Pract.; 2018; 4, pp. 276-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.155]
25. Birdee, G.S.; Sohl, S.J.; Wallston, K. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Yoga Self-Efficacy Scale (YSES). BMC Complement. Altern. Med.; 2016; 16, 3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0981-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26738919]
26. Arney, B.E.; Glover, R.; Fusco, A.; Cortis, C.; de Koning, J.J.; van Erp, T.; Jaime, S.; Mikat, R.P.; Porcari, J.P.; Foster, C. Comparison of RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) Scales for Session RPE. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform.; 2019; 14, pp. 994-996. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2018-0637] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30569764]
27. Mahaffey, K. The Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale Explained. National Academy of Sports Medicine. Fitness Web Site. Available online: https://blog.nasm.org/rate-of-perceived-exertion. (accessed on 30 October 2022).
28. Rated Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale. 2019; Cleveland Clinic Available online: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/17450-rated-perceived-exertion-rpe-scale. (accessed on 30 October 2022).
29. Tanaka, H.; Monahan, K.D.; Seals, D.R. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.; 2001; 37, pp. 153-156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01054-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11153730]
30. Pate, J.L.; Buono, M.J. The physiological responses to Bikram yoga in novice and experienced practitioners. Altern. Ther. Health Med.; 2014; 20, pp. 12-18. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25141359]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The 2nd edition of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAG) recommends, in part, 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity. The PAG states that yoga may be able to help meet the guidelines for moderate-intensity aerobic exercise for adults and older adults. Our study aims to objectively measure the proportion of time participants’ activity that is categorized as moderate-intensity aerobic activity based on heart rate data and to subjectively measure rate of perceived exertion (RPE). Participants completed the Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical item to establish baseline PAG aerobic activity compliance. Participants then completed four separate 1-h yoga sessions at different tempos (cadence) and temperatures while wearing heart rate monitors. During and directly after the session they also marked their RPE on a modified 10-point scale. All participants reached moderate-intensity aerobic activity for at least some portion of a yoga session based on heart rate monitor data and RPE. The average duration of moderate intensity was 32.75% of the class across all four class types, with no significant differences by condition. Age was a significant factor in time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for only the thermo-neutral Hatha classes (p = 0.010). Tempo, temperature, and baseline activity levels were not significant factors in time spent in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity based on Pearson Correlation and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Hatha and Vinyasa yoga classes, at room or hot temperatures, can be used to meet a portion of the PAG moderate-intensity activity recommendations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer






