Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

The pursuit for blood a substitute has spanned over a century, but a majority of the efforts have been disappointing. As of today, there is no widely accepted product used as an alternative to human blood in clinical settings with severe anemic condition(s). Blood substitutes are currently also termed oxygen therapeutics. There are two major categories of oxygen therapeutics, hemoglobin-based and perfluorocarbon-based products. In this article, we reviewed the most developed but failed products and products still in active clinical research in the category of hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers. Among all of the discussed hemoglobin-based oxygen therapeutics, HemAssist, PolyHeme, Hemolink, Hemospan, and Hemoximer were discontinued. Hemopure is in clinical use in South Africa and Russia. Oxyglobin, the sister product of Hemopure, has been approved for veterinary use in the European Union and the United States. HemO2life has recently been approved for organ preservation in organ transplantation in the European Union. OxyVita and Sanguinate are still undergoing active clinical studies. The field of oxygen therapeutics seems to be entering a phase of rapid growth in the coming 10–20 years.

Details

Title
Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers: Where Are We Now in 2023?
Author
Chen, Lin 1 ; Yang, Zeyong 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Liu, Henry 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Department of Anesthesiology, Hubei Women & Children’s Hospital, 745 Wuluo Road, Hongshan, Wuhan 430070, China 
 Department of Anesthesiology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryogenic Disease, Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty, 1961 Huashan Road, Shanghai 200030, China 
 Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 
First page
396
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
MDPI AG
ISSN
1010660X
e-ISSN
16489144
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2779511191
Copyright
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.