1. Introduction
A successful fetal-to-neonatal transition relies on a series of exquisitely orchestrated physiological events that enable the switch from the placental intervillous gas exchange to lung air respiration [1]. The initiation of breathing movements immediately after birth in term infants is characterized by deep inspiratory diaphragmatic, intercostal, and subcostal muscular contractions that cause a tridimensional expansion of the thoracic cage. Thorax expansion contributes to the creation of a negative transthoracic pressure equal to or greater than −40 cmH2O. This is the driving force that will facilitate the extrusion of the fluid filling the conductive airways into the alveolar interstitial space. Lung aeration permits alveolar gas exchange, which subsequently causes a sudden increment of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) [2,3,4].
Oxygen is a potent vasodilator that contributes to pulmonary arterial vessel dilatation, thus reducing pulmonary vascular resistance [5]. Consequently, there is a significant increase in pulmonary blood flow from 138 to 245 mL/kg/min [1]. In addition, increased PaO2 favors the closure of the ductus arteriosus [1]. Moreover, enhanced preload of both the right and the left ventricles will mechanically contribute to the closure of the foramen ovale. Thus, in several minutes, the newborn infant switches from a serial to a parallel type of circulation that will persist throughout their entire life [1].
In term newborns, birth asphyxia is the most common condition needing resuscitation [6]. The main intervention under these circumstances will be to provide positive pressure ventilation to restore an effective gas exchange and to supply oxygen and glucose to the central nervous system and myocardium, both of which are essential for the infant’s survival [7]. However, preterm infants who represent approximately 10% of all deliveries worldwide are especially predisposed to difficulties in establishing a regular and effective pattern of respiration immediately after birth. The immaturity of the respiratory drive and lung cytoarchitecture, the lack of surfactant production, the excessive elasticity of the thoracic cage, and the debility of the respiratory musculature often hamper the initiation of the first inspiratory movements, the establishment of an effective clearance of lung fluid, and the establishment of a functional residual capacity (FRC). All these circumstances frequently lead preterm infants, especially very preterm infants, to respiratory insufficiency. Consequently, a substantial proportion of preterm infants will need respiratory support in the first minutes after birth including oxygen supplementation to satisfactorily undergo postnatal stabilization [8].
Only a decade ago, preterm babies needing respiratory support in the first minutes after birth were directly intubated and ventilated [9]. However, the concept of “the first golden minutes” was put forward, aiming to achieve postnatal stabilization by employing the least aggressive approach in babies who were mostly spontaneously breathing and crying and just needed some support to overcome the difficulties inherent to their immaturity. This concept was primarily targeted toward ventilation upon stabilization in the delivery room (DR) [10].
In recent years, delaying cord clamping has become a standard of care in term and preterm infants [11,12]. Evolving pulse oximeter saturation and heart rate (HR) in the first 10 min after birth in healthy term babies with delayed cord clamping significantly differs from Dawson’s nomogram, which constitutes the reference range for the management of oxygen in the DR [13,14]. Initiating ventilation with a patent cord has implied physiological advantages in the experimental setting [15]. This new approach to positive pressure ventilation in the DR is being explored by different research groups [16,17,18,19,20]; however, results are not yet available, therefore caution in the application of this new modality of ventilation should guide our steps and be restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in the DR is of paramount importance for the resuscitation of term and the stabilization of preterm infants immediately after birth. The present review article provides a critical update to the recently published experience of ventilation in the DR of extreme preterm defined as newborn infants born at <28 weeks gestation.
2. Physiology of the Respiratory Fetal-to-Neonatal Transition
During fetal life, the gas exchange between mother and fetus takes place in the intervillous spaces of the placenta. Increased pulmonary vascular resistance renders pulmonary blood flow almost inexistent. Hence, oxygenated blood is redirected through fetal shunts (ductus venosus, foramen ovale, and ductus arteriosus) to the upper part of the body and especially to the cerebral and coronary circulations, thus avoiding non-perfused lungs that are not responsible for the fetal gas exchange [21]. Hence, oxygenated blood from the placenta is only partially merged with deoxygenated blood from the fetal superior vena cava.
At birth, physiological factors such as the interruption of cord blood flow and the initiation of inspiratory efforts will cause significant hemodynamic changes. A sudden increase in the systemic vascular resistance caused by the interruption of the umbilical arteries’ blood flow contributes to the inversion of flow in the ductus arteriosus and foramen ovale causing their functional and anatomical closure. Simultaneously, the first inspiratory efforts extrude liquid filling the lungs, favor surfactant distribution, prompt lung aeration, and establish an FRC, which triggers a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance, increases the pulmonary blood flow and oxygenation, and reduces the work of breathing. The establishment of an FRC is the cornerstone of the postnatal adaptation of the newly born infant.
Subsequently, the left heart preload with oxygenated blood increases and closes the septal layer of the foramen ovale. Hence, the sudden postnatal increase in pulmonary blood flow directly depends on lung aeration and oxygenation and is essential to prevent the drop in cardiac output that will occur if cord clamping precedes lung aeration [21].
The fetal-to-neonatal transition establishes parallel-type circulation in which deoxygenated blood reaches the right heart and is directed to low-resistance pulmonary circulation where oxygenation takes place. By contrast, the full return of oxygenated blood from the lungs to the left heart is directed to systemic circulation to provide tissue oxygenation [21].
There are a number of reasons why the physiological fetal-to-neonatal transition can be disrupted in preterm infants [21,22,23]: Surfactant deficit, weaker respiratory drive, periodic respiration or even apneic episodes, low inherent cardiac contractility, limited ability to adjust cardiac output, poorer tolerance to high systemic vascular resistance, and persistence of fetal shunts. In this context, respiratory support in the delivery room may be the key to a successful or failed transition and, finally, to better or worse clinical outcomes.
Figure 1 summarizes the alveolar changes in the fetal-to-neonatal transition. In preterm infants, although crying and spontaneous breathing is often present, the respiratory effort can be weaker than necessary to establish an FRC. Under these circumstances, the application of positive airway pressure will contribute to the generation of a sufficient pressure gradient to extrude the fluid in the lung to the interstitial space. In addition, preterm infants have delayed clearance of lung fluid because of decreased sodium resorption and weaker respiratory drive [24,25]. Either a large pressure gradient (inflating pressure) or a greater duration of inflation may be needed [26].
Of note, fluid accumulated in the alveolar interstitium generates positive pressure against the alveoli, which translates into an increased tendency of alveolar collapse and re-introduction of fluid within the alveoli during the expiratory phase. These circumstances are aggravated by a lack of surfactants in premature infants. Therefore, a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has to be applied as respiratory support to premature newborn infants to prevent lung edema and/or atelectasis and alveolar collapse [26].
During fetal life, the larynx offers resistance to the efflux of lung liquid and, in contrast to postnatal life, when apnea occurs in the fetus, the glottis remains closed in an attempt to prevent the loss of intrapulmonary fluid that is essential for fetal lung growth [27]. Recent imaging studies in a rabbit model have shown that the onset of spontaneous breathing may be the key step for this reflex to change and, therefore, for the glottis to remain open. Hence, when ventilation fails in an apneic newborn infant, an airway obstruction secondary to a persistence of the fetal glottis reflex may be the cause. In this situation, the focus should be shifted toward stimulating breathing and avoiding the cause of apnea by standard maneuvers such as cutaneous stimulation or rubbing the back [27].
3. Oxygen Supplementation in the Delivery Room
3.1. Oxygen in the Fetal-to-Neonatal Transition
The initiation of breathing immediately after birth boosts the availability of oxygen in the newly born infant. The PaO2 rises from 30–40 mmHg (4–5.3 kPa) in utero to 70–80 mmHg (9.3–10.6 kPa) ex utero in a few minutes. Oxygen saturation, which fluctuates from 45–55% in the fetus, rapidly increases to 85–95% in the first 10 min after birth [28]. It is vital for the survival of very preterm infants (<32 weeks of gestation) to rapidly achieve optimal oxygenation in the first minutes after birth when the energy demands exponentially increase and gas exchange through the placenta is interrupted. As shown in Figure 2, a careful balance in postnatal oxygenation is necessary because oxygen in excess causes oxidative stress and harms cellular structures. On the other hand, postnatal hypoxemia is associated with increased mortality and/or intra-peri-ventricular hemorrhage (IPVH) [29].
Current guidelines recommend preductal oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitoring with a pulse oximeter and keeping SpO2 within recommended ranges after birth titrating FiO2 accordingly [7,30]. SpO2 targets for the first 10 min after birth were based on the percentiles reference range put forward by Dawson JA et al. [13]. Dawson’s reference range was built by merging three databases of newborn infants who did not need resuscitation in the delivery room (DR). Only 30% of these babies were preterm and most of them were late preterm [13]. Resuscitation guidelines (4) generally use the 25th percentile of Dawson’s nomogram as a reference for SpO2 as the lower acceptable value. SpO2 considered “safe” evolves from levels >60–65% in 2 min to >80% in 5 min [7,31]. The recommendation of delaying cord clamping in recent guidelines [7] changed the reference range values for HR and SpO2 in the first 10 min after birth. Ashish KC et al. [32] randomized 1510 women with fetal HR ≥ 100 ≤ 160 bpm and gestational age (GA) ≥ 33 weeks to cord clamping ≤60 s and ≥180 s after birth. SpO2 was 18% higher by 1 min, 13% higher by <5 min, and 10% higher by 10 min in babies in the group of prolonged cord clamping. Padilla et al. [14] built SpO2 and HR curves in healthy-term newborns with delayed cord clamping for a median of 111 s. Compared with Dawson’s curves, they found significantly higher SpO2 and HR already in the first minute after birth. Thus, the median and IQR of SpO2 (%) at 1, 5, and 10 min after birth were 77 (68–85), 94 (90–96), and 96 (93–98), respectively. HR (beats per minute) median and IQR at 1, 5, and 10 min after birth were 148 (84–170), 155 (143–167), and 151 (142–161). Badurdeen et al. [16] stabilized preterm infants using physiologically based cord clamping (PBCC). PBCC is defined as clamping the cord after establishing lung aeration. Preterm infants at ≥32 + 0 weeks GA were randomized to either early cord clamping (ECC) or PBCC either using PPV or effective spontaneous breathing prior to cord clamping. The median GA for both groups was approximately 39 weeks GA. Cord clamping was performed at a median of 136 s in the PBCC group and 37 s in the ECC group. No differences in HR between 1 and 2 min after birth were evidenced. The percentile chart for SpO2 was elaborated with a total of 295 infants >35 weeks GA with delayed cord clamping ≥ 2 min. Out of these, 54.6% were born vaginally and 45.4% by C-section. The median SpO2 reached 85% at 4 min and 90% at 5 min.
3.2. What Initial FiO2 Is Best for Very Preterm Infants in the First Minutes after Birth?
In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Saugstad et cols. [33] showed that the use of room air as compared with 100% oxygen for the resuscitation of asphyxiated term infants significantly reduced mortality. The 2010 international resuscitation guidelines were modified and room air was recommended as the initial FiO2 for asphyxiated term infants needing resuscitation [34,35,36].
Concomitantly, a series of clinical studies summarized in Table 1 compared the use of higher vs. lower initial FiO2 levels during the stabilization of preterm infants in the delivery room. The results of these studies concluded that it was feasible to stabilize very preterm infants with a lower (<0.3) initial FiO2. In addition, the use of lower initial FiO2 reduced oxidative stress and inflammation as reflected by specific biomarkers [37,38]. However, in preterm infants in the lower FiO2 group, the achievement of target saturation was often delayed and therefore these babies needed an increase in the inspired fraction of oxygen. In 2015, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines recommended initiating the resuscitation of newborns <35 weeks GA with room air and very preterm infants <32 weeks of gestation with FiO2 0.3, thus discouraging the use of a higher concentration (FiO2 0.65–1.0) [39]. In a recent survey, most NICUs in high-income countries initiated respiratory support in moderate-late preterm with FiO2 0.21 (43%) or 0.3 (36%) [40]. However, only 45% titrated FiO2 to targeted SpO2. Interestingly, of the 695 respondents, while 90% had pulseoximeters in the DR, only 69% had access to oxygen blenders, rendering oxygen titration impossible [40].
Oei et al. [51], in a randomized controlled non-blinded trial, the TORPIDO trial, compared mortality and clinical outcomes of preterm infants <32 weeks GA initially stabilized with room air or 100% oxygen. Unexpectedly, in a post-hoc analysis, the room-air group showed a significantly increased relative risk of death (RR 3.9; CI 1.1–13.4) in the subgroup of newborns <28 weeks GA. The investigators acknowledged that the trial had been interrupted before achieving the number of patients calculated to achieve the statistical power. Moreover, the study had not been powered for this specific secondary outcome. Notwithstanding, they cautioned against the use of room air in newborns <28 weeks [51].
Lui K et al. [52], employing the Cochrane methodology, aimed to determine whether using a lower (FiO2 < 0.4) or higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) initial oxygen concentration titrated to targeted SpO2 improved short- and long-term mortality and/or morbidity. The study included randomized controlled trials but also cluster- and quasi-randomized trials. A total of 10 trials with 914 infants were included. The results did not show any differences in mortality compared to discharge or secondary outcomes such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), IPVH, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), or persistent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Moreover, no differences in neurodevelopmental disability were assessed at 2 years. However, the quality of the evidence was defined as low due to the high risk of bias and imprecision. The authors concluded that there is uncertainty as to whether using higher or lower initial FiO2 in preterm <32 weeks GA targeted to SpO2 in the first 10 min after birth has a significant effect on mortality or major morbidities or long-term neurodevelopmental disability at 2 years of age [52].
In 2019, Welsford et al. [53] carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of 5697 preterm infants <35 weeks GA stabilized with an initial lower oxygen concentration (≤50%) vs. a higher oxygen concentration (>50%). No differences were found in short-term mortality, neurodevelopment at two years, or other morbidities such as IVH, BPD, ROP, or NEC among others [53]. It was concluded that there is no benefit or risk in initiating resuscitation with lower or higher FiO2 [53].
3.3. Long-Term Outcomes and the Initial FiO2
Only a few follow-up studies dealing with the long-term influence of the initial FiO2 provided during postnatal stabilization in preterm infants have been published (see Table 2). Soraisham et al. [54], in a retrospective cohort study, assessed death and/or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in 1509 preterm infants <29 weeks GA stabilized with FiO2 of 0.21, 1.0, or intermediate values in the delivery room. The composite score of death or NDI was not different for either of the three groups. However, in survivors, the adjusted odds for severe NDI were significantly higher in the group resuscitated with 100% oxygen compared with 0.21 (adjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05, 2.35). It was concluded that the use of 100% oxygen could be a triggering factor for brain inflammation and damage that impaired neurodevelopment in survivors in infancy [54]. In 2011, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (USA) recommended the switch from an initial FiO2 of 1.0 to 0.21 for the stabilization of preterm infants. Kapadia et al. [55], in a retrospective observational study, analyzed the consequences regarding mortality, relevant neonatal morbidities, and NDI in preterm infants of this significant change. The results showed that mortality in the newborn period was not different between groups; however, survivors of the room-air group scored better in the motor composite score of the Bayley III Scale. Moreover, babies in the low-oxygen period spent fewer days on oxygen and had a lower incidence of BPD [55]. Boronat N et al. (23) compared mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants at the 24-month corrected age assigned to an initial FiO2 0.3 vs. 0.6–0.65 in two randomized controlled and blinded trials. No differences in mortality were established. Moreover, Bayley III scales motor, cognitive and language composites, neurosensorial handicaps, cerebral palsy, or language skills did not show any differences between groups.
3.4. SpO2 Targets and Oxygen Titration
The initial FiO2 should be titrated to achieve targeted SpO2s at specific time points using an air–oxygen blender (Figure 3). The most widely employed references in the literature are the recommendations of the 2010 American Heart Association resuscitation algorithm aiming at SpO2 70–75% at 3 min and 80–85% at 5 min [34] and of the European Resuscitation Council’s (ERC) newborn life support algorithm that recommends reaching 70% at 3 min and 85% at 5 min [36]. These targeted values are close to the median values of newborn infants not needing resuscitation. However, evidence-based information regarding the pulse oximetry response to increasing or decreasing FiO2 in preterm infants is lacking. A group of experts recommended based on their experience that if SpO2 was below the 10th percentile, then FiO2 should be increased in 10% increments every 30 s aiming to reach the 25–50th percentile avoiding SpO2 higher than 90% because this may be associated with PaO2 clearly reaching a toxic value [58].
The target SpO2 range recommended for term and preterm infants are similar, and most guidelines [7,59] recommend keeping SpO2 above percentile 25 of the reference charts during the first 10 min after birth. For premature newborns, this recommendation poses uncertainty since the percentile SpO2 curves were obtained predominantly from healthy-term infants. Preterm infants included were primarily late preterm, and there was a very low representation of preterm infants < 32 weeks [13].
In 2006, Canada changed the resuscitation policy from 100% oxygen for all born babies to 21%. In 2015, Rabi et al. [60], in a retrospective cohort study, compared a historical cohort of preterm babies ≤27 weeks GA before the change in the resuscitation policy (2004–2006) with a cohort after the policy change (2007–2009). They found increased mortality and a higher risk of severe neurological injury in newborns resuscitated initially with room air. During the study period of 2004–2009, the use of pulse oximetry in the DR was not yet standardized, nor were there established target SpO2 ranges. Thereafter, reference ranges for SpO2 and titration policies were implemented. In fact, a meta-analysis in newborns ≤ 28 weeks [61] found no differences in mortality and morbidity when comparing resuscitation with an initial higher vs. lower oxygen concentration. Intriguingly, they found differences in mortality depending on whether the studies were blinded (favoring low FiO2) or unblinded (favoring high FiO2). Although the cause of this effect is not known, the authors suggested that the adjustment of FiO2 in response to changes in SpO2 could be the key to this difference. Hence, in a recent meta-analysis performed in newborns <32 weeks, evolving SpO2 in the first 10 min after birth was assessed [62]. Of note, only 25% of newborns reached the target SpO2 (≥80–85%) at 5 min. Moreover, not reaching 80% SpO2 at 5 min was associated with a higher rate of severe IVH, and the longer the time needed to reach SpO2 >80%, the higher risk of death. Newborns with lower GA and lower initial FiO2 were more likely to fail to achieve a SpO2 of 80% [62]. In an individual patient meta-analysis from three randomized trials comparing higher (>0.6) vs. lower (<0.3) initial FiO2 in preterm infants <32 weeks GA, Oei JL et al. [63] found that initial FiO2 was not associated with differences in death and/or disability or cognitive scores <85 at 2 years of age. However, SpO2 >80% at five minutes was associated with decreased disability/death and cognitive scores >85. It may be concluded that, more so than the initial FiO2, it is achieving oxygen saturation above 80% five minutes after birth that reduces mortality and brain damage in very preterm infants.
Oxygen is a potent stimulator of respiratory drive. In experimental studies, it has been shown that hypoxemia induces respiratory depression [64]. Dekker et al. [65] performed a small RCT comparing two groups of newborns < 30 weeks who were resuscitated with 30% (n = 24) vs. 100% (n = 20) and observed their effect on spontaneous ventilation. They retrieved detailed information on the management of oxygen titration during stabilization and measured oxidative stress biomarkers. They found that the group resuscitated with 100% O2 had a better respiratory effort with significantly higher tidal volumes (VT), better oxygenation with a shorter duration of hypoxemia, and a shorter duration of ventilation compared to the 30% group, with no increased risk of hyperoxia or oxidative stress [65]. However, the rates of intubation in the DR or at <24 h, IVH grades III, death, or BPD were not different [63]. These results open the door to adequately powered RCTs comparing the use of higher vs. lower initial oxygen concentrations with rapid titration to avoid an oxygen overload. Until then, the results of this study should be treated with caution.
3.5. Current Recommendations
Currently, the ILCOR 2020 guidelines [7] recommend the use of lower initial FiO2 (0.21–0.30) for newborns < 35 weeks who receive respiratory support at birth (weak recommendation, with very low certainty of the evidence). However, there are some differences between the different guidelines. While the American Heart Association (AHA) [30] recommends an initial FiO2 of up to 0.3, the ERC [59]) recommends using a low oxygen concentration depending on GA (0.21 in newborns ≥ 32 weeks, 0.21–0.3 in newborns 28–31 weeks, and 0.3 in newborns < 28 weeks).
4. Respiratory Support
Despite the immaturity of the lung, thoracic cage and muscles, and respiratory drive, approximately 80% of very preterm infants (<32 weeks GA) and even extremely preterm <26 weeks GA initiate spontaneous breathing or crying at birth. [66,67]. The ILCOR 2020 guidelines recommend nasally administered continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to provide ventilatory support and establish/maintain lung FRC [7]. The use of tracheal intubation has declined over the last decade in very preterm infants in the first golden minutes and may confer advantages toward survival without major morbidity [68].
In recent years, proactive resuscitation has substantially increased the rate of survival of micro-preemies in the limit of viability (22–24 weeks GA). The ventilatory support strategies employed to enhance morbidity-free survival rates vary considerably among institutions reflecting the lack of evidence-based studies, which hampers the establishment of consensus guidelines as has been acknowledged by different international resuscitation guidelines [7,30,59,69,70].
We approach different aspects of stabilization and resuscitation during the golden minutes and focus especially on the subgroup of premature infants born <25 weeks gestation.
4.1. Ventilation in Preterm Infants in the Delivery Room
Immediately after birth, caregivers aim to stabilize preterm infants, independently of their GA, on non-invasive respiratory support [10]. CPAP remains the most widely employed mode of noninvasive respiratory support to establish an FRC and achieve lung recruitment. However, extremely preterm infants frequently require a face mask for intermittent positive pressure ventilation support (IPPV) with PEEP during the initial stabilization phase in the transitional period. The effectiveness of face mask PPV requires choosing the right size to cover the nose and mouth, applying it without excessive pressure to avoid compression of the trigeminal-cardiac reflex, detecting face mask leakage or airway obstruction with a respiratory function monitor (RFM), and repositioning the mask [8,71] (Table 3).
4.2. Modalities of Non-Invasive Ventilation: CPAP and PPV Plus PEEP
A general summary of the respiratory approach is depicted in Figure 4. In spontaneously breathing preterm infants CPAP with 6 cmH2O and non-breathing newborns, intermittent PPV with an inflation pressure of 20 to 25 cmH2O and PEEP of 5 cmH2O at a rate of 40 to 60 breaths/min should be provided early after birth [72]. Ideally, pressures should be adjusted according to lung compliance [73] and the patient’s evolving HR and SpO2 [9,74,75].
For infants requiring higher supplemental oxygen, the CPAP level may be titrated higher up to 7–8 cm [76]. It has been shown that stepwise increments of PEEP after birth improved the rates of survival and reduced morbidity in preterm infants [77]. Petrillo et al. showed that sustained inflation (SI) followed by nCPAP in the range of 6 to 8 cmH2O, administered with the RAM nasal cannula (RAM Nasal Cannula, Neotech Products, Valencia, CA, USA) vs. face mask CPAP of 5 cmH2O, resulted in a significant reduction of the intubation rate in the DR [78]. Increasing the pressure in the initial minutes after birth should be carefully considered. Hence, 75% of neonates born at <29 weeks’ GA resuscitated with a T-piece resuscitator (TPR), set with a peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 24 and PEEP of 6 cmH2O, received VT > 6 mL/kg, which can injure the lungs and contribute to IVH [79].
No optimal CPAP pressure has been established. However, preclinical studies in preterm lambs [80,81] and rabbits [82] compared titrated pressures in a range of 0–12 cmH2O and concluded that CPAP levels >10 cmH2O improved oxygenation [71], suggesting that uniform lung aeration is best achieved by starting respiratory support with higher PEEP levels. However, higher PEEP levels should be cautiously applied because they could overexpand the lungs and decrease pulmonary blood flow and the breathing rate [71]. In an RCT, the use of CPAP ≥ 8 cmH2O during resuscitation significantly increased the rate of pneumothoraces [83], while infants on CPAP levels of 5 to 7 cmH2O did not exhibit this [84]. In addition, inadvertent PEEP above the set value should be taken into consideration [73,76].
4.3. Type of Devices: T-Piece Resuscitator (TPR), Self-Inflating Bag (SIB), Mechanical Ventilators
It is mandatory that the ventilation devices employed in the DR provide PIP, PEEP, and/or CPAP [8]. The self-inflating bag (SIB) and the T-piece resuscitator (TPR) are the two most common manual ventilation devices employed for respiratory support in DR. However, CPAP is not applicable with SIB. Moreover, the SIB expiratory valves are unreliable for providing PEEP with very low VT [85]. However, the use of SIB is essential for neonatal resuscitation in regions where pressurized gases are not readily available [7].
Experimental studies suggest the benefit of using devices providing controlled levels of PEEP and PIP to assist in the establishment of pulmonary FRC during the transition and reduce lung damage secondary to barotrauma [86,87]. In manikin studies, TPR delivered more consistent PPV and more homogeneous VT than SIB [88,89,90]. In preterm neonates, TPR resulted in better control of PaCO2 levels compared to SIB during surfactant administration [74]. In addition, Roehr et al. [91], in a recent systematic review, identified new evidence that pointed towards improved survival, decreased BPD, and fewer intubations at birth in preterm infants stabilized with TPR [92,93].
It is currently unclear which TPR is most effective for applying CPAP at birth. The effect of pressure stability and expiratory resistance was compared with seven CPAP systems in simulated breath profiles. Neopuff (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) and Medijet (Medin CNO Medical Innovations, Puchheim, Germany) had the highest pressure instability and imposed work of breathing. Benveniste (gas-jet valve Dameca, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Prongs Firma H. Mortensen, Randers, Denmark), Hamilton Universal Arabella (Hamilton Medical AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland), and Bubble CPAP (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) showed intermediate results. AirLife (Cardinal Health, Waukegan, IL, USA) and Infant Flow (Viasys Healthcare Respiratory Care, Palm Springs, CA, USA) showed the lowest pressure instability and imposed work of breathing and the lowest decrease in delivered pressure when challenged with a constant leak [94]. A new TPR device (rPAP) that uses a dual-flow ratio valve (fluidic flip) to produce PEEP/CPAP, designed to be used with nasal prongs, showed low imposed work of breathing and kept PEEP at the set value due to inherent TPR device design characteristics, decreasing the rate of intubation or death in the DR [73,95].
Ventilators are commonly used for CPAP delivery and PPV during transport and in the NICU rather than in the DR [9]. However, in the Uppsala University Children’s Hospital (Sweden) and Kitasato University, Kanagawa (Japan), babies in the limit of viability (22–23 weeks GA) are intubated immediately after birth and placed on ventilators with targeted VT avoiding bag and mask ventilation or CPAP [70].
4.4. Interfaces for Delivering Mask Non-Invasive Ventilation
Two different types of masks are available for mask PIP or CPAP, anatomic or round masks. O’Donnell et al. found no differences in air leaks between the two different mask types [96]. The effectiveness of the face mask PPV depends on achieving an adequate seal to avoid airway obstruction and mask leak, gently placed to avoid the potential activation of the naso-trigeminal reflex [75,97]. Short binasal prong interfaces typically had greater resistance at the smallest assessed sizes, which could deliver insignificant VT [98]. The experience with its application is limited, but RAM nasal cannula reported a decrease in DR intubation [99]. Small nasal masks can be used as an alternative to binasal prongs generating less intrinsic resistance compared with short binasal prongs [98]. The use of a single nasal tube causes large leaks, more obstruction, delays PPV initiation because of placement, and lower VT and higher requirements for supplemental oxygen compared with the face mask [100]. Effective ventilation decreasing early neonatal mortality and brain injury could be more easily achieved with a supraglottic airway device than with a face mask [101,102]. However, this device has been underutilized due to inappropriate sizes for premature babies, providers’ limited experience, limited knowledge of its functionality, and likely due to a lack of evidence. A high-flow nasal cannula (6–8 L/min) or non-invasive high-frequency oscillation in the DR is not yet recommended until reliable evidence is available [9].
The trigeminal-cardiac reflex and laryngeal closure may reduce the effectiveness of non-invasive respiratory support in premature infants immediately after birth [103]. Experimental studies in rabbits have shown that postnatal hypoxia may lead to the closure of the glottis, rendering PPV ineffective [103]. Moreover, inadequate patency of the glottis reduces the effectiveness of SI [71]. The facial compression caused by the application of a face mask may cause intense bradycardia by inducing a trigeminal-cardiac reflex [104]. Kuypers et al. showed that apnea and/or bradycardia occurred after applying either bi-nasal prongs or a face mask on the face for respiratory support in preterm infants at birth [105]. Cutaneous stimulation and supporting spontaneous breathing could enhance the success of non-invasive ventilation by ensuring that the larynx remains open [106].
4.5. Heated and Humidified Gas (HHG)
Heating and humidification of inspired gases for the initial stabilization of preterm infants and during transport to the neonatal unit improve the admission temperature in preterm infants, especially below 28 weeks GA [107,108]. Notwithstanding, recommendations for conditioning gases during newborn stabilization cannot yet be given based on the limited evidence currently available, as has been underscored in the last ILCOR CoSTR survey [7].
4.6. Endotracheal Intubation
ILCOR 2020 guidelines [7] recommended the use of CPAP rather than intubation for spontaneously breathing preterm infants with respiratory distress requiring respiratory support in the delivery room. Both RCTs and meta-analyses with high-quality evidence have shown a reduction in the combined outcome of death and BPD when starting treatment with CPAP compared with intubation and ventilation in very preterm infants with respiratory distress [83,84,109,110,111,112,113]. The meta-analysis reported no differences in the individual outcomes of mortality, BPD, pneumothorax, IVH, NEC, or ROP [112].
ERC 2021 guidelines suggested considering intubation in the case of needing surfactant administration in the DR [59]. However, in a recent Cochrane review, surfactant delivery via a thin catheter to spontaneously breathing preterm infants compared with surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (ETT) was associated with a decrease in the risk of death, BPD, and severe IVH [114].
4.7. Resuscitation of Extreme Preterm in the Limit of Viability
Extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks GA) require early prophylactic non-invasive respiratory ventilation (NIV) initiated in the DR [59,66,69]. However, the most extremely preterm infants, also known as micro-preemies (22–24 weeks GA), require immediate intubation and mechanical ventilation at birth followed by prolonged dependency on non-invasive respiratory support and supplemental oxygen therapy [66]. The SUPPORT trial showed more favorable outcomes in infants who received early nCPAP treatment in comparison with surfactant treatment in the DR [84]. However, infants <24 weeks GA were not included in this study because pre-study trials had shown nCPAP failure in 23-week infants, similar to what was reported in previous studies, such as the COIN trial [83]. Consequently, the number of micro-preemies enrolled in clinical trials has been too small to show clear scientific evidence of the relationship between intubation and an increased risk of BPD.
Available evidence of the effectiveness of NIV applied to this category of patients is limited, and optimal CPAP pressure to obtain a stable FRC is not known. Of note, it is very unusual for micro-preemies to breathe spontaneously. Consequently, tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in infants born at 22–23 weeks GA immediately after birth has become a standard of care in centers with a proactive attitude towards the treatment of these patients in the limits of viability [95,115,116].
There are minimal data on micro-preemies in relation to the necessary ventilation pressures. On the one hand, some studies show that a peak inflation pressure of 20 cmH2O might be too low to effectively recruit the lungs in extremely premature infants [117,118,119]. In contrast, Bhat et al. performed a prospective study in preterm infants <34 weeks GA to assess combinations of inflation pressures and times and the resulting expiratory VT levels using an RFM. Inflation pressure was the key factor producing significantly higher expiratory VT, and a longer inflation time was not necessary to increase expiratory VT [118]. Murthy et al. found that only 27% of infants had expiratory VT greater than 4.4 mL/kg, but these VT were measured only for the first five inflations via ETT when adequate VT rarely occurs [117]. On the other hand, RCT in the DR with a fixed initial PIP and settings according to VT [75] show different pressure levels to achieve adequate lung recruitment depending on GA, with PIP less than 20 cmH2O. This strategy is also used regularly in Japanese groups with an active attitude toward micropremies [115]. We suggest a set of maneuvers and strategies for the management of premature infants at the limit of viability (22–23 weeks GA) described in Table 4.
4.8. Respiratory Function Monitor (RFM)
The effectiveness of mask ventilation can be improved using an RFM. There are different models and brands of RFM but all of them provide continuous real-time information of inspiratory and expiratory graphs, the respiratory rate, VT, SpO2, or air leaks. This information allows one to detect problems/pitfalls associated with mask ventilation early [75,97,120]. RCTs comparing the use of an RFM in addition to clinical assessment vs. clinical assessment alone during mask ventilation in the DR of infants born <37 weeks’ gestation showed that using an RFM to guide VT delivery might reduce injury and improve outcomes [75,120,121]. In a meta-analysis of three RCTs enrolling 443 infants, the pooled analysis showed no differences in the rates of death before discharge with an RFM vs. no RFM. However, a significant reduction for any brain injury considered a combination of IVH and PVL (RR 0.65 (0.48 to 0.89), p = 0.006) and IVH (RR 0.69 (0.50 to 0.96), p = 0.03) was assessed in infants receiving PPV with an RFM vs. no RFM. Moreover, these studies reported that fewer infants in the RFM-visible group had expired VT > 8 mL/kg, compared with the no-RFM group [122]. However, there is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for or against its use [7,123]. Long-term neurological outcomes to assess the efficacy of RFMs during mask ventilation in preterm infants will help to make a strong recommendation for its use in the delivery room. Perhaps its cost-effectiveness and the training requirements precluded the generalized use of RFM [124]. The monitoring of non-invasive ventilation effectiveness (either by capnography or RFM) is becoming more common outside research settings to detect adverse events to be able to reposition the mask and thus decrease them [122,125,126].
5. Conclusions
At present, the optimal initial FiO2 and how to titrate oxygen during the stabilization of very preterm infants in the delivery room are yet unknown.
Optimizing ventilation to establish a good lung capacity and cutaneous stimulation to trigger spontaneous breathing both contribute to the establishment of effective respiration in the initial minutes after birth.
Despite the initial FiO2, titrating oxygen to achieve SpO2 targets of 80–85% five minutes after birth seems appropriate to reduce the damage caused by hypoxia or hyperoxia during resuscitation in the DR.
Reference ranges in newborns with deferred, as compared to immediate, cord clamping show differences in SpO2 and HR in the initial minutes after birth.
The initiation of ventilation with an intact cord (physiologic-based cord clamping) seems to be a promising strategy to enhance oxygenation and achieve hemodynamic stabilization in the initial minutes after birth; however, until more evidence is available, caution is advised.
The application of optimal strategies to use NIV modalities immediately after birth is important to establish an FRC to reduce the need for intubation, invasive mechanical ventilation, mortality, and BPD.
Implementing a resuscitation bundle involves determining the appropriate size and sealed mask, head repositioning, the opening of the mouth, increasing the pressure when indicated and regulating it depending on the patient’s response and changes in lung compliance, and debriefing after each intubation.
TPR allows accurate PPV with PEEP. There is no current evidence to suggest one interface is better than another. Evidence was insufficient to recommend the use of heated, humidified gases for assisted ventilation.
Feedback devices such as RFM can help detect adverse events.
To reduce unwarranted variability in the care of most extremely preterm infants between 22 and 23 weeks of GA, we propose respiratory support including immediate oral intubation, applying TPR immediately, and avoiding bag ventilation either by mask or ETT, ECG leads, or an ETT secured lip level. This approach could be considered for use in preterm infants of 24 weeks GA.
Conceptualization, R.E.-F. and M.V.; methodology, R.E.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, R.E.-F., G.Z.-S., A.A.-A., M.G.-M., J.D.T.-P. and M.V.; writing—review and editing, R.E.-F., G.Z.-S. and M.V.; supervision, M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. In fetal life, lung and respiratory airways are filled with fluid (panel (A)). Immediately after birth, intense respiratory efforts generating intense pressures extrude lung fluid to the interstitium, and closure of the glottis and surfactant distribution in the surface of the alveoli contributes to establishing a functional residual capacity (panel (B)). Ongoing respiratory efforts once the FRC has been established require less positive inspiratory pressures (PIP) and positive-end expiratory pressures (PEEP) to maintain an adequate gas exchange (panel (C)).
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Fetal-to-neonatal transition implies a drastic change to the oxygen provided to the tissue causing physiologic oxidative stress. However, under pathological circumstances, an excess of oxygen can lead to hyperoxia and subsequent pathologic oxidative stress and tissue damage with long and/or short-term consequences. In contrast, low oxygenation can cause hypoxemia, bradycardia, and consequently serious complications such as intra-peri-ventricular hemorrhage (IPVH) and/or death.
![View Image - Figure 3. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) according to AHA guidelines should be targeted at 70–75% at 3 min and 80–85 at 5 min. Heart rate (HR) should be targeted at >100 bpm in the first 2–3 min after birth. Red and blue rectangles define the normality ranges for SPO2 and HR, respectively, at different postnatal timings after birth (Graph modified from reference [28]). Red and blue rectangles define the upper and lower of normality ranges for SPO2 and HR, respectively, minute-by-minute in the first 10 min of life.](https://media.proquest.com/media/hms/THUM/6/VwamQ?_a=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%3D%3D&_s=APZAc0THmbEZms2XJJcYll%2BorIM%3D "View Image - Figure 3. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) according to AHA guidelines should be targeted at 70–75% at 3 min and 80–85 at 5 min. Heart rate (HR) should be targeted at >100 bpm in the first 2–3 min after birth. Red and blue rectangles define the normality ranges for SPO2 and HR, respectively, at different postnatal timings after birth (Graph modified from reference [28]). Red and blue rectangles define the upper and lower of normality ranges for SPO2 and HR, respectively, minute-by-minute in the first 10 min of life.")
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) according to AHA guidelines should be targeted at 70–75% at 3 min and 80–85 at 5 min. Heart rate (HR) should be targeted at >100 bpm in the first 2–3 min after birth. Red and blue rectangles define the normality ranges for SPO2 and HR, respectively, at different postnatal timings after birth (Graph modified from reference [28]). Red and blue rectangles define the upper and lower of normality ranges for SPO2 and HR, respectively, minute-by-minute in the first 10 min of life.
![View Image - Figure 4. Suggested steps to be followed in very preterm delivery. The main issues in the delivery room are (i) maintaining an adequate body temperature and avoiding hypothermia; (ii) improving hemodynamics stability, delaying cord clamping, or including an obstetrician or midwife in the first seconds of neonatal stimulation; (iii) in spontaneously breathing babies, providing non-invasive ventilation with mask or nasal prongs CPAP, trying to avoid intubation. If the respiratory efforts are insufficient to achieve an adequate FRC, IPPV with PEEP should be provided. (iv) In apneic babies, initial non-invasive ventilation with IPPV and PEEP should be provided. If IPPV and PEEP are not efficient, intubation is required. (v) Initial FiO2 of 0.21 to 0.3 should be titrated using an air/oxygen blender according to HR and SPO2 response. Modified from Vento et al. Pediatr Respir Rev. (2015) [8]. Abbreviations: GA: Gestational age; w: Week; sec: Second; DCC: Delayed cord clamping; min: Minute; CPAP: Continuous positive airway pressure; IPPV: Intermittent positive pressure ventilation; PEEP: Positive-end expiratory pressure; iFiO2: Initial fraction of inspired oxygen; AHA: American Heart Association; SpO2: Oxygen saturation.](https://media.proquest.com/media/hms/THUM/8/VwamQ?_a=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%3D%3D&_s=NXMKDfGacD7MHMWreJGMsbgp%2BWQ%3D "View Image - Figure 4. Suggested steps to be followed in very preterm delivery. The main issues in the delivery room are (i) maintaining an adequate body temperature and avoiding hypothermia; (ii) improving hemodynamics stability, delaying cord clamping, or including an obstetrician or midwife in the first seconds of neonatal stimulation; (iii) in spontaneously breathing babies, providing non-invasive ventilation with mask or nasal prongs CPAP, trying to avoid intubation. If the respiratory efforts are insufficient to achieve an adequate FRC, IPPV with PEEP should be provided. (iv) In apneic babies, initial non-invasive ventilation with IPPV and PEEP should be provided. If IPPV and PEEP are not efficient, intubation is required. (v) Initial FiO2 of 0.21 to 0.3 should be titrated using an air/oxygen blender according to HR and SPO2 response. Modified from Vento et al. Pediatr Respir Rev. (2015) [8]. Abbreviations: GA: Gestational age; w: Week; sec: Second; DCC: Delayed cord clamping; min: Minute; CPAP: Continuous positive airway pressure; IPPV: Intermittent positive pressure ventilation; PEEP: Positive-end expiratory pressure; iFiO2: Initial fraction of inspired oxygen; AHA: American Heart Association; SpO2: Oxygen saturation.")
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Suggested steps to be followed in very preterm delivery. The main issues in the delivery room are (i) maintaining an adequate body temperature and avoiding hypothermia; (ii) improving hemodynamics stability, delaying cord clamping, or including an obstetrician or midwife in the first seconds of neonatal stimulation; (iii) in spontaneously breathing babies, providing non-invasive ventilation with mask or nasal prongs CPAP, trying to avoid intubation. If the respiratory efforts are insufficient to achieve an adequate FRC, IPPV with PEEP should be provided. (iv) In apneic babies, initial non-invasive ventilation with IPPV and PEEP should be provided. If IPPV and PEEP are not efficient, intubation is required. (v) Initial FiO2 of 0.21 to 0.3 should be titrated using an air/oxygen blender according to HR and SPO2 response. Modified from Vento et al. Pediatr Respir Rev. (2015) [8]. Abbreviations: GA: Gestational age; w: Week; sec: Second; DCC: Delayed cord clamping; min: Minute; CPAP: Continuous positive airway pressure; IPPV: Intermittent positive pressure ventilation; PEEP: Positive-end expiratory pressure; iFiO2: Initial fraction of inspired oxygen; AHA: American Heart Association; SpO2: Oxygen saturation.
Clinical studies comparing higher or lower initial FiO2 for the stabilization of preterm infants in the delivery room.
| Reference | Study Design | [Initial FiO2] | Objectives | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harling 2005 |
RCT |
0.5 vs. 1.0 | ↓ lung inflammation | No significant differences in lung inflammation. |
| Stola 2005 [ |
Cohort |
Variable vs. 1.0 | Viability PaO2 at NICU admission | ↓ PaO2 at NICU admission with lower FiO2 |
| Wang 2008 |
RCT |
0.21 vs. 1.0 | Viability; SpO2 targets: |
Supplemental O2 necessary in 21% group. |
| Escrig 2008 |
RCT |
0.3 vs. 0.9 | SpO2 target 85% at 10 min |
It is possible use less FiO2. |
| Dawson 2009 [ |
Cohort |
0.21 vs. 1.0 | Viability |
Supplemental O2 is necessary in 21% arm. |
| Ezaki 2009 [ |
PO & target SpO2 |
Variable vs. 1.0 | Oxidative stress | ↑ oxidative stress in 100% group. |
| Rabi 2011 [ |
RCT |
Static 1 vs |
Viability |
Titrating is more effective than static |
| Armanian 2012 |
RCT |
0.3 vs. 1.0 | SpO2 target 85% | It is possible to use less FiO2. |
| Rook 2014 [ |
RCT |
0.3 vs. 0.65 | Major neonatal illness |
30% is as safe as 65%. |
| Kapadia 2013 [ |
RCT |
0.21 vs. 1.0 | Oxidative stress |
It is possible to use less FiO2 |
| Aguar 2013 [ |
RCT |
0.30 vs. 0.60 | Death at 28 days and morbidities |
It is possible to use less FiO2 |
| Oei 2017 [ |
RCT |
0.21 vs. 1.0 | Major disability and death at 2 y |
Increased risk of death in infants <28 weeks in the lower FiO2 group. |
Abbreviations: RCT: Randomized controlled trial; PO: Pulse oximetry; GA: Gestational age; BPD: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; PMA: Postmenstrual age; SpO2: Oxygen saturation; FiO2: Inspired fraction of oxygen; WB: Weight birth; NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit; PaO2: Arterial partial pressure of oxygen. ↑ is increase and ↓ is decrease.
Follow-up of clinical studies of preterm infants stabilized with higher vs. lower initial FiO2 in the delivery room.
| Study Design | [Initial FiO2] | Objectives | Neurodevelopmental Evaluation Test | Outcomes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boronat [ |
RCT |
0.3–0.6 | Outcome at 24 months postmenstrual age (PMA) | Bayley III | No differences |
| Soraisham [ |
Retrospective cohort |
0.21–1.0 | Outcome at 18–21 months PMA | Bayley III | Severe NDI in survivors was significantly higher in the 100% oxygen group |
| Kapadia [ |
Retrospective cohort |
0.21–1.0 | Outcome at 22–26 months PMA | Bayley III | No differences |
| Thamrin [ |
RCT |
0.21–1.0 | Death or NDI at 24 months PMA | Bayley III | No differences |
Abbreviations: RCT: Randomized controlled trial; SPO2: Oxygen saturation; GA: Gestational age; PMA: Postmenstrual age; NDI: Neurodevelopmental impairment.
Adverse events that reduce the effectiveness of face mask ventilation.
|
Abbreviation: VT: Tidal volume.
Strategies for the management of preterm infants in the limit of viability (22–23 weeks GA) in the golden hour following the suggestions of neonatal centers with greater experience in the treatment of micro-preemies [
| Before birth | Assemble designated staff. Brief with attending team. |
| Thermal care | Plastic bag without drying. |
| Delayed cord clamping [ |
Any gestational age if resuscitation isn’t needed. |
| Initial ventilatory support at stabilization (while placing |
|
| ETT size internal diameter/intubation depth |
|
| Initial PIP set not to exceed 20 cmH2O |
|
| If use RFM | set volume targeted 2.5 mL (5 mL/kg), |
| Initial FiO2 [ |
0.3 |
| Suggested first intended ventilatory settings [ |
CV: PIP = 20–22 cmH2O, PEEP = 5 cmH2O, backup frequency = 40–60/min, VT = 4–6 mL/kg. |
| Surfactant administration | within 2 h of life |
| After birth | Debriefing with the attending team |
CV = conventional ventilation, ETT = endotracheal tube, FiO2 = Fraction of inspired oxygen, GA = gestational age, HFOV = High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation, TPR= T-piece resuscitation, MAP = mean airway pressure, nCPAP = Continuous positive airway pressure administered nasally, PEEP = positive end-expiratory pressure, PIP= peak inspiratory pressure, PPV = Positive pressure ventilation, RR = Respiratory rate, Ti = inspiratory time, VT = tidal volume, VThf = volume guarantee in high frequency oscillator ventilation. I:E = inspiration expiration ratio. * After recruitment, delimit 15–20 cmH2O above what is necessary to reach set VThf.
References
1. Gao, Y.; Raj, J.U. Regulation of the pulmonary circulation in the fetus and newborn. Physiol. Rev.; 2010; 90, pp. 1291-1335. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20959617]
2. te Pas, A.B.; Wong, C.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Dawson, J.A.; Morley, C.J.; Davis, P.G. Breathing patterns in preterm and term infants immediately after birth. Pediatr. Res.; 2009; 65, pp. 352-356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e318193f117] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19391251]
3. Baixauli-Alacreu, S.; Padilla-Sánchez, C.; Hervás-Marín, D.; Lara-Cantón, I.; Solaz-García, A.; Alemany-Anchel, M.J.; Vento, M. Expired Tidal Volume and Respiratory Rate During Postnatal Stabilization of Newborn Infants Born at Term via Cesarean Delivery. J. Pediatr. X; 2021; 6, 100063. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100063]
4. te Pas, A.B.; Davis, P.G.; Hooper, S.B.; Morley, C.J. From liquid to air: Breathing after birth. J. Pediatr.; 2008; 152, pp. 607-611. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.10.041] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18410760]
5. Rawat, M.; Lakshminrusimha, S.; Vento, M. Pulmonary hypertension and oxidative stress: Where is the link?. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med.; 2022; 27, 101347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2022.101347]
6. Lee, A.C.C.; Kozuki, N.; Blencowe, H.; Vos, T.; Bahalim, A.; Darmstadt, G.L.; Niermeyer, S.; Ellis, M.; Robertson, N.J.; Cousens, S. et al. Intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy incidence and impairment at regional and global levels for 2010 with trends from 1990. Pediatr. Res.; 2013; 74, (Suppl. S1), pp. 50-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.206]
7. Wyckoff, M.H.; Wyllie, J.; Aziz, K.; de Almeida, M.F.; Fabres, J.; Fawke, J.; Guinsburg, R.; Hosono, S.; Isayama, T.; Kapadia, V.S. et al. Neonatal Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation; 2020; 142, pp. S185-S221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000895]
8. Vento, M.; Lista, G. Managing preterm infants in the first minutes of life. Paediatr. Respir. Rev.; 2015; 16, pp. 151-156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2015.02.004]
9. Weydig, H.; Ali, N.; Kakkilaya, V. Noninvasive Ventilation in the Delivery Room for the Preterm Infant. Neoreviews; 2019; 20, pp. e489-e499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/neo.20-9-e489]
10. Vento, M.; Cheung, P.-Y.; Aguar, M. The first golden minutes of the extremely-low-gestational-age neonate: A gentle approach. Neonatology; 2009; 95, pp. 286-298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000178770]
11. Gomersall, J.; Berber, S.; Middleton, P.; McDonald, S.J.; Niermeyer, S.; El-Naggar, W.; Davis, P.G.; Schmölzer, G.M.; Ovelman, C.; Soll, R.F. et al. Umbilical Cord Management at Term and Late Preterm Birth: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics; 2021; 147, e2020015404. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-015404] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632933]
12. Seidler, A.L.; Gyte, G.M.L.; Rabe, H.; Díaz-Rossello, J.L.; Duley, L.; Aziz, K.; Testoni Costa-Nobre, D.; Davis, P.G.; Schmölzer, G.M.; Ovelman, C. et al. Umbilical Cord Management for Newborns <34 Weeks’ Gestation: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics; 2021; 147, e20200576. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0576] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632931]
13. Dawson, J.A.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Vento, M.; Wong, C.; Cole, T.J.; Donath, S.M.; Davis, P.G.; Morley, C.J. Defining the reference range for oxygen saturation for infants after birth. Pediatrics; 2010; 125, pp. e1340-e1347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1510] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20439604]
14. Padilla-Sánchez, C.; Baixauli-Alacreu, S.; Cañada-Martínez, A.J.; Solaz-García, Á.; Alemany-Anchel, M.J.; Vento, M. Delayed vs. Immediate Cord Clamping Changes Oxygen Saturation and Heart Rate Patterns in the First Minutes after Birth. J. Pediatr.; 2020; 227, pp. 149-156.e1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.07.045] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710909]
15. Polglase, G.R.; Dawson, J.A.; Kluckow, M.; Gill, A.W.; Davis, P.G.; Te Pas, A.B.; Crossley, K.J.; McDougall, A.; Wallace, E.M.; Hooper, S.B. Ventilation onset prior to umbilical cord clamping (physiological-based cord clamping) improves systemic and cerebral oxygenation in preterm lambs. PLoS One; 2015; 10, e0117504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117504] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25689406]
16. Badurdeen, S.; Davis, P.G.; Hooper, S.B.; Donath, S.; Santomartino, G.A.; Heng, A.; Zannino, D.; Hoq, M.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Kane, S.C. et al. Physiologically based cord clamping for infants ≥32+0 weeks gestation: A randomised clinical trial and reference percentiles for heart rate and oxygen saturation for infants ≥35+0 weeks gestation. PLoS Med.; 2022; 19, e1004029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004029] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737735]
17. Katheria, A.C.; Brown, M.K.; Faksh, A.; Hassen, K.O.; Rich, W.; Lazarus, D.; Steen, J.; Daneshmand, S.S.; Finer, N.N. Delayed Cord Clamping in Newborns Born at Term at Risk for Resuscitation: A Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Pediatr.; 2017; 187, pp. 313-317.e1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.033]
18. Knol, R.; Brouwer, E.; van den Akker, T.; DeKoninck, P.L.J.; Lopriore, E.; Onland, W.; Vermeulen, M.J.; van den Akker-van Marle, M.E.; van Bodegom-Vos, L.; de Boode, W.P. et al. Physiological-based cord clamping in very preterm infants: The Aeration, Breathing, Clamping 3 (ABC3) trial-study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials; 2022; 23, 838. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06789-6]
19. Ekelöf, K.; Sæther, E.; Santesson, A.; Wilander, M.; Patriksson, K.; Hesselman, S.; Thies-Lagergren, L.; Rabe, H.; Andersson, O. A hybrid type I, multi-center randomized controlled trial to study the implementation of a method for Sustained cord circulation And VEntilation (the SAVE-method) of late preterm and term neonates: A study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022; 22, 593. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04915-5]
20. Pratesi, S.; Montano, S.; Ghirardello, S.; Mosca, F.; Boni, L.; Tofani, L.; Dani, C. Placental Circulation Intact Trial (PCI-T)-Resuscitation with the Placental Circulation Intact vs. Cord Milking for Very Preterm Infants: A Feasibility Study. Front. Pediatr.; 2018; 6, 364. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00364]
21. Finnemore, A.; Groves, A. Physiology of the fetal and transitional circulation. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med.; 2015; 20, pp. 210-216. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2015.04.003]
22. Heldt, G.P.; McIlroy, M.B. Dynamics of chest wall in preterm infants. J. Appl. Physiol.; 1987; 62, pp. 170-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1987.62.1.170] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3558177]
23. te Pas, A.B.; Davis, P.G.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Dawson, J.; O’Donnell, C.P.F.; Morley, C.J. Spontaneous breathing patterns of very preterm infants treated with continuous positive airway pressure at birth. Pediatr. Res.; 2008; 64, pp. 281-285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817d9c35]
24. Barker, P.M.; Gowen, C.W.; Lawson, E.E.; Knowles, M.R. Decreased sodium ion absorption across nasal epithelium of very premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J. Pediatr.; 1997; 130, pp. 373-377. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70198-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9063411]
25. Morton, S.U.; Brodsky, D. Fetal Physiology and the Transition to Extrauterine Life. Clin. Perinatol.; 2016; 43, pp. 395-407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2016.04.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27524443]
26. te Pas, A.B.; Siew, M.; Wallace, M.J.; Kitchen, M.J.; Fouras, A.; Lewis, R.A.; Yagi, N.; Uesugi, K.; Donath, S.; Davis, P.G. et al. Establishing functional residual capacity at birth: The effect of sustained inflation and positive end-expiratory pressure in a preterm rabbit model. Pediatr. Res.; 2009; 65, pp. 537-541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819da21b] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19190537]
27. Hooper, S.B.; Kitchen, M.J.; Polglase, G.R.; Roehr, C.C.; Te Pas, A.B. The physiology of neonatal resuscitation. Curr. Opin. Pediatr.; 2018; 30, pp. 187-191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000590]
28. Lara-Cantón, I.; Solaz, A.; Parra-Llorca, A.; García-Robles, A.; Millán, I.; Torres-Cuevas, I.; Vento, M. Oxygen Supplementation During Preterm Stabilization and the Relevance of the First 5 min After Birth. Front. Pediatr.; 2020; 8, 12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00012]
29. Sotiropoulos, J.X.; Vento, M.; Saugstad, O.D.; Oei, J.L. The quest for optimum oxygenation during newborn delivery room resuscitation: Is it the baby or is it us?. Semin. Perinatol.; 2022; 46, 151622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2022.151622]
30. Aziz, K.; Lee, H.C.; Escobedo, M.B.; Hoover, A.V.; Kamath-Rayne, B.D.; Kapadia, V.S.; Magid, D.J.; Niermeyer, S.; Schmölzer, G.M.; Szyld, E. et al. Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation; 2020; 142, pp. S524-S550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000902]
31. Andersson, O.; Mercer, J.S. Cord Management of the Term Newborn. Clin. Perinatol.; 2021; 48, pp. 447-470. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2021.05.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353575]
32. Kc, A.; Singhal, N.; Gautam, J.; Rana, N.; Andersson, O. Effect of early versus delayed cord clamping in neonate on heart rate, breathing and oxygen saturation during first 10 minutes of birth—randomized clinical trial. Matern. Health Neonatol. Perinatol.; 2019; 5, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40748-019-0103-y]
33. Saugstad, O.D.; Ramji, S.; Soll, R.F.; Vento, M. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology; 2008; 94, pp. 176-182. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000143397] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18612215]
34. Perlman, J.M.; Wyllie, J.; Kattwinkel, J.; Atkins, D.L.; Chameides, L.; Goldsmith, J.P.; Guinsburg, R.; Hazinski, M.F.; Morley, C.; Richmond, S. et al. Part 11: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Circulation; 2010; 122, pp. S516-S538. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971127] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20956259]
35. Kattwinkel, J.; Perlman, J.M.; Aziz, K.; Colby, C.; Fairchild, K.; Gallagher, J.; Hazinski, M.F.; Halamek, L.P.; Kumar, P.; Little, G. et al. Part 15: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation; 2010; 122, pp. S909-S919. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971119]
36. Richmond, S.; Wyllie, J. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 7. Resuscitation of babies at birth. Resuscitation; 2010; 81, pp. 1389-1399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.018]
37. Kapadia, V.S.; Chalak, L.F.; Sparks, J.E.; Allen, J.R.; Savani, R.C.; Wyckoff, M.H. Resuscitation of preterm neonates with limited versus high oxygen strategy. Pediatrics; 2013; 132, pp. e1488-e1496. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0978]
38. Vento, M.; Moro, M.; Escrig, R.; Arruza, L.; Villar, G.; Izquierdo, I.; Roberts, L.J.; Arduini, A.; Escobar, J.J.; Sastre, J. et al. Preterm resuscitation with low oxygen causes less oxidative stress, inflammation, and chronic lung disease. Pediatrics; 2009; 124, pp. e439-e449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0434]
39. Wyckoff, M.H.; Aziz, K.; Escobedo, M.B.; Kapadia, V.S.; Kattwinkel, J.; Perlman, J.M.; Simon, W.M.; Weiner, G.M.; Zaichkin, J.G. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation; 2015; 132, pp. S543-S560. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267]
40. Sotiropoulos, J.X.; Kapadia, V.; Vento, M.; Rabi, Y.; Saugstad, O.D.; Kumar, R.K.; Schmölzer, G.M.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, Y.; Lim, G. et al. Oxygen for the delivery room respiratory support of moderate-to-late preterm infants. An international survey of clinical practice from 21 countries. Acta Paediatr.; 2021; 110, pp. 3261-3268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.16091]
41. Harling, A.E.; Beresford, M.W.; Vince, G.S.; Bates, M.; Yoxall, C.W. Does the use of 50% oxygen at birth in preterm infants reduce lung injury?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2005; 90, pp. F401-F405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.059287] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15863491]
42. Stola, A.; Schulman, J.; Perlman, J. Initiating delivery room stabilization/resuscitation in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with an FiO(2) less than 100% is feasible. J. Perinatol.; 2009; 29, pp. 548-552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.34] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357695]
43. Wang, C.L.; Anderson, C.; Leone, T.A.; Rich, W.; Govindaswami, B.; Finer, N.N. Resuscitation of preterm neonates by using room air or 100% oxygen. Pediatrics; 2008; 121, pp. 1083-1089. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1460] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18519476]
44. Escrig, R.; Arruza, L.; Izquierdo, I.; Villar, G.; Sáenz, P.; Gimeno, A.; Moro, M.; Vento, M. Achievement of targeted saturation values in extremely low gestational age neonates resuscitated with low or high oxygen concentrations: A prospective, randomized trial. Pediatrics; 2008; 121, pp. 875-881. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1984] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18450889]
45. Dawson, J.A.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Wong, C.; te Pas, A.B.; O’Donnell, C.P.F.; Donath, S.M.; Davis, P.G.; Morley, C.J. Oxygen saturation and heart rate during delivery room resuscitation of infants <30 weeks’ gestation with air or 100% oxygen. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2009; 94, pp. F87-F91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.141341]
46. Ezaki, S.; Suzuki, K.; Kurishima, C.; Miura, M.; Weilin, W.; Hoshi, R.; Tanitsu, S.; Tomita, Y.; Takayama, C.; Wada, M. et al. Resuscitation of preterm infants with reduced oxygen results in less oxidative stress than resuscitation with 100% oxygen. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr.; 2009; 44, pp. 111-118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.08-221]
47. Rabi, Y.; Singhal, N.; Nettel-Aguirre, A. Room-air versus oxygen administration for resuscitation of preterm infants: The ROAR study. Pediatrics; 2011; 128, pp. e374-e381. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3130]
48. Armanian, A.M.; Badiee, Z. Resuscitation of preterm newborns with low concentration oxygen versus high concentration oxygen. J. Res. Pharm. Pract.; 2012; 1, pp. 25-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2279-042X.99674]
49. Rook, D.; Schierbeek, H.; Vento, M.; Vlaardingerbroek, H.; van der Eijk, A.C.; Longini, M.; Buonocore, G.; Escobar, J.; van Goudoever, J.B.; Vermeulen, M.J. Resuscitation of preterm infants with different inspired oxygen fractions. J. Pediatr.; 2014; 164, pp. 1322-1326.e3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.019]
50. Aguar, M.; Brugada, M.; Escobar, J.J. Resuscitation of ELBW Infants with Initial FiO2 30% vs. 60%, a Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Study: The REOX Trial. Proceedings of the PAS Annual Meeting; Washington, DC, USA, 4–7 May 2013.
51. Oei, J.L.; Saugstad, O.D.; Lui, K.; Wright, I.M.; Smyth, J.P.; Craven, P.; Wang, Y.A.; McMullan, R.; Coates, E.; Ward, M. et al. Targeted Oxygen in the Resuscitation of Preterm Infants, a Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatrics; 2017; 139, e20161452. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1452]
52. Lui, K.; Jones, L.J.; Foster, J.P.; Davis, P.G.; Ching, S.K.; Oei, J.L.; Osborn, D.A. Lower versus higher oxygen concentrations titrated to target oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.; 2018; 5, CD010239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010239.pub2]
53. Welsford, M.; Nishiyama, C.; Shortt, C.; Weiner, G.; Roehr, C.C.; Isayama, T.; Dawson, J.A.; Wyckoff, M.H.; Rabi, Y. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Life Support Task Force Initial Oxygen Use for Preterm Newborn Resuscitation: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Pediatrics; 2019; 143, e20181828. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1828] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578326]
54. Soraisham, A.S.; Rabi, Y.; Shah, P.S.; Singhal, N.; Synnes, A.; Yang, J.; Lee, S.K.; Lodha, A.K. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants resuscitated with different oxygen concentration at birth. J. Perinatol.; 2017; 37, pp. 1141-1147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.83] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594395]
55. Kapadia, V.S.; Lal, C.V.; Kakkilaya, V.; Heyne, R.; Savani, R.C.; Wyckoff, M.H. Impact of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program–Recommended Low Oxygen Strategy on Outcomes of Infants Born Preterm. J. Pediatr.; 2017; 191, pp. 35-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.074]
56. Boronat, N.; Aguar, M.; Rook, D.; Iriondo, M.; Brugada, M.; Cernada, M.; Nuñez, A.; Izquierdo, M.; Cubells, E.; Martinez, M. et al. Survival and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterms Resuscitated With Different Oxygen Fractions. Pediatrics; 2016; 138, e20161405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1405] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27940687]
57. Thamrin, V.; Saugstad, O.D.; Tarnow-Mordi, W.; Wang, Y.A.; Lui, K.; Wright, I.M.; De Waal, K.; Travadi, J.; Smyth, J.P.; Craven, P. et al. Preterm Infant Outcomes after Randomization to Initial Resuscitation with FiO2 0.21 or 1.0. J. Pediatr.; 2018; 201, pp. 55-61.e1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.053] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30251639]
58. Dawson, J.A.; Vento, M.; Finer, N.N.; Rich, W.; Saugstad, O.D.; Morley, C.J.; Davis, P.G. Managing oxygen therapy during delivery room stabilization of preterm infants. J. Pediatr.; 2012; 160, pp. 158-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.07.045]
59. Madar, J.; Roehr, C.C.; Ainsworth, S.; Ersdal, H.; Morley, C.; Rüdiger, M.; Skåre, C.; Szczapa, T.; Te Pas, A.; Trevisanuto, D. et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth. Resuscitation; 2021; 161, pp. 291-326. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.014]
60. Rabi, Y.; Lodha, A.; Soraisham, A.; Singhal, N.; Barrington, K.; Shah, P.S. Outcomes of preterm infants following the introduction of room air resuscitation. Resuscitation; 2015; 96, pp. 252-259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.012]
61. Oei, J.L.; Vento, M.; Rabi, Y.; Wright, I.; Finer, N.; Rich, W.; Kapadia, V.; Aune, D.; Rook, D.; Tarnow-Mordi, W. et al. Higher or lower oxygen for delivery room resuscitation of preterm infants below 28 completed weeks gestation: A meta-analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2017; 102, pp. F24-F30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310435]
62. Oei, J.L.; Finer, N.N.; Saugstad, O.D.; Wright, I.M.; Rabi, Y.; Tarnow-Mordi, W.; Rich, W.; Kapadia, V.; Rook, D.; Smyth, J.P. et al. Outcomes of oxygen saturation targeting during delivery room stabilisation of preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2018; 103, pp. F446-F454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312366] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28988158]
63. Oei, J.L.; Kapadia, V.; Rabi, Y.; Saugstad, O.D.; Rook, D.; Vermeulen, M.J.; Boronat, N.; Thamrin, V.; Tarnow-Mordi, W.; Smyth, J. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants after randomisation to initial resuscitation with lower (FiO2 < 0.3) or higher (FiO2 > 0.6) initial oxygen levels. An individual patient meta-analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2022; 107, pp. 386-392. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2021-321565] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725105]
64. Dekker, J.; Hooper, S.B.; Croughan, M.K.; Crossley, K.J.; Wallace, M.J.; McGillick, E.V.; DeKoninck, P.L.J.; Thio, M.; Martherus, T.; Ruben, G. et al. Increasing Respiratory Effort With 100% Oxygen During Resuscitation of Preterm Rabbits at Birth. Front. Pediatr.; 2019; 7, 427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00427] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31696099]
65. Dekker, J.; Martherus, T.; Lopriore, E.; Giera, M.; McGillick, E.V.; Hutten, J.; van Leuteren, R.W.; van Kaam, A.H.; Hooper, S.B.; Te Pas, A.B. The Effect of Initial High vs. Low FiO2 on Breathing Effort in Preterm Infants at Birth: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Pediatr.; 2019; 7, 504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00504]
66. Norman, M.; Jonsson, B.; Wallström, L.; Sindelar, R. Respiratory support of infants born at 22–24 weeks of gestational age. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med.; 2022; 27, 101328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2022.101328] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35400604]
67. Schwaberger, B.; Urlesberger, B.; Schmölzer, G.M. Delivery Room Care for Premature Infants Born after Less than 25 Weeks’ Gestation—A Narrative Review. Children; 2021; 8, 882. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8100882]
68. García-Muñoz Rodrigo, F.; Losada Martínez, A.; Elorza Fernández, M.D.; Moreno Hernando, J.; Figueras Aloy, J.; Vento Torres, M. The Burden of Respiratory Disease in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: Changes in Perinatal Care and Outcomes in a Decade in Spain. Neonatology; 2017; 112, pp. 30-39. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000455966]
69. Sweet, D.G.; Carnielli, V.; Greisen, G.; Hallman, M.; Ozek, E.; te Pas, A.; Plavka, R.; Roehr, C.C.; Saugstad, O.D.; Simeoni, U. et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome—2019 Update. Neonatology; 2019; 115, pp. 432-450. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000499361]
70. Sindelar, R.; Nakanishi, H.; Stanford, A.H.; Colaizy, T.T.; Klein, J.M. Respiratory management for extremely premature infants born at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation in proactive centers in Sweden, Japan, and USA. Semin. Perinatol.; 2022; 46, 151540. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151540]
71. Martherus, T.; Oberthuer, A.; Dekker, J.; Hooper, S.B.; McGillick, E.V.; Kribs, A.; te Pas, A.B. Supporting breathing of preterm infants at birth: A narrative review. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2019; 104, pp. F102-F107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314898]
72. Lista, G.; Fontana, P.; Castoldi, F.; Cavigioli, F.; Bianchi, S.; Bastrenta, P. ELBW infants: To intubate or not to intubate in the delivery room?. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.; 2012; 25, pp. 55-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.715008]
73. Hinder, M.; McEwan, A.; Drevhammer, T.; Donaldson, S.; Tracy, M.B. T-piece resuscitators: How do they compare?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2019; 104, pp. F122-F127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314860]
74. Jeevan, A.; Balasubramanian, H.; Kabra, N. Effect of T-Piece Resuscitator versus Self Inflating Bag on Arterial CO2 Levels in Preterm Neonates. Indian J. Pediatr.; 2020; 87, pp. 897-904. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03393-x]
75. Sarrato, G.Z.; Luna, M.S.; Sarrato, S.Z.; Pérez, A.P.; Chamorro, I.P.; Cano, J.M.B. New Strategies of Pulmonary Protection of Preterm Infants in the Delivery Room with the Respiratory Function Monitoring. Am. J. Perinatol.; 2019; 36, pp. 1368-1376. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676828]
76. Weiner, G.M.; Zaichkin, J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation; 8th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics: Itasca, IL, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-1-61002-524-9
77. Mehler, K.; Grimme, J.; Abele, J.; Huenseler, C.; Roth, B.; Kribs, A. Outcome of extremely low gestational age newborns after introduction of a revised protocol to assist preterm infants in their transition to extrauterine life. Acta Paediatr.; 2012; 101, pp. 1232-1239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12015]
78. Petrillo, F.; Valenzano, L.; Franco, C.; Calò, G.; Dentico, D.; Manzoni, P.; D’Amato, G.; Del Vecchio, A. Pulmonary Recruitment Strategy in Preterm Neonates < 29 Weeks of Gestational Age to Reduce the Need for Intubation in the Delivery Room. Am. J. Perinatol.; 2019; 36, pp. S115-S119. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692134] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238371]
79. Mian, Q.; Cheung, P.-Y.; O’Reilly, M.; Barton, S.K.; Polglase, G.R.; Schmölzer, G.M. Impact of delivered tidal volume on the occurrence of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants during positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2019; 104, pp. F57-F62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313864]
80. PPolglase, G.R.; Hillman, N.H.; Pillow, J.J.; Cheah, F.-C.; Nitsos, I.; Moss, T.J.M.; Kramer, B.W.; Ikegami, M.; Kallapur, S.G.; Jobe, A.H. Positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume during initial ventilation of preterm lambs. Pediatr. Res.; 2008; 64, pp. 517-522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181841363] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596572]
81. Mulrooney, N.; Champion, Z.; Moss, T.J.M.; Nitsos, I.; Ikegami, M.; Jobe, A.H. Surfactant and Physiologic Responses of Preterm Lambs to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2005; 171, pp. 488-493. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200406-774OC] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15502113]
82. Kitchen, M.J.; Siew, M.L.; Wallace, M.J.; Fouras, A.; Lewis, R.A.; Yagi, N.; Uesugi, K.; Pas, A.T.; Hooper, S.B. Changes in positive end-expiratory pressure alter the distribution of ventilation within the lung immediately after birth in newborn rabbits. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e93391. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093391]
83. Morley, C.J.; Davis, P.G.; Doyle, L.W.; Brion, L.P.; Hascoet, J.-M.; Carlin, J.B. COIN Trial Investigators Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2008; 358, pp. 700-708. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072788] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18272893]
84. SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2010; 362, pp. 1970-1979. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0911783] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20472939]
85. Holte, K.; Ersdal, H.; Eilevstjønn, J.; Gomo, Ø.; Klingenberg, C.; Thallinger, M.; Linde, J.; Stigum, H.; Yeconia, A.; Kidanto, H. et al. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Newborn Resuscitation Around Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics; 2020; 146, e20200494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0494] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917847]
86. Hillman, N.H.; Moss, T.J.M.; Kallapur, S.G.; Bachurski, C.; Pillow, J.J.; Polglase, G.R.; Nitsos, I.; Kramer, B.W.; Jobe, A.H. Brief, Large Tidal Volume Ventilation Initiates Lung Injury and a Systemic Response in Fetal Sheep. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2007; 176, pp. 575-581. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200701-051OC]
87. Haddad, L.; Mascaretti, R.; Valle, L.; Rebello, C. A Self-Inflating Bag May Cause Hypocapnia in a Rabbit Model of Manual Ventilation Compared to the T-piece Resuscitator. Am. J. Perinatol.; 2017; 34, pp. 1405-1410. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603732]
88. Hawkes, C.P.; Ryan, C.A.; Dempsey, E.M. Comparison of the T-piece resuscitator with other neonatal manual ventilation devices: A qualitative review. Resuscitation; 2012; 83, pp. 797-802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.020]
89. Bennett, S.; Finer, N.N.; Rich, W.; Vaucher, Y. A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices. Resuscitation; 2005; 67, pp. 113-118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.02.016]
90. Finer, N.N.; Rich, W.; Craft, A.; Henderson, C. Comparison of methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation; 2001; 49, pp. 299-305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(01)00311-2]
91. Roehr, C.C.; Davis, P.G.; Weiner, G.M.; Jonathan Wyllie, J.; Wyckoff, M.H.; Trevisanuto, D. T-piece resuscitator or self-inflating bag during neonatal resuscitation: A scoping review. Pediatr. Res.; 2021; 89, pp. 760-766. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-1005-4]
92. Thakur, A.; Saluja, S.; Modi, M.; Kler, N.; Garg, P.; Soni, A.; Kaur, A.; Chetri, S. T-piece or self inflating bag for positive pressure ventilation during delivery room resuscitation: An RCT. Resuscitation; 2015; 90, pp. 21-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.021]
93. Guinsburg, R.; de Almeida, M.F.B.; de Castro, J.S.; Gonçalves-Ferri, W.A.; Marques, P.F.; Caldas, J.P.S.; Krebs, V.L.J.; de Souza Rugolo, L.M.S.; de Almeida, J.H.C.L.; Luz, J.H. et al. T-piece versus self-inflating bag ventilation in preterm neonates at birth. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2018; 103, pp. F49-F55. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312360] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28663283]
94. Drevhammar, T.; Nilsson, K.; Zetterström, H.; Jonsson, B. Comparison of seven infant continuous positive airway pressure systems using simulated neonatal breathing. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med.; 2012; 13, pp. e113-e119. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822f1b79] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21946854]
95. Donaldsson, S.; Drevhammar, T.; Li, Y.; Bartocci, M.; Rettedal, S.I.; Lundberg, F.; Odelberg-Johnson, P.; Szczapa, T.; Thordarson, T.; Pilypiene, I. et al. Comparison of Respiratory Support After Delivery in Infants Born Before 28 Weeks’ Gestational Age: The CORSAD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr.; 2021; 175, 911. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1497] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34125148]
96. O’Donnell, C.P.F. Neonatal resuscitation 2: An evaluation of manual ventilation devices and face masks. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2005; 90, pp. F392-F396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.064691]
97. Schmölzer, G.M.; Dawson, J.A.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; O’Donnell, C.P.F.; Morley, C.J.; Davis, P.G. Airway obstruction and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2011; 96, pp. F254-F257. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.191171] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21081593]
98. Green, E.A.; Dawson, J.A.; Davis, P.G.; De Paoli, A.G.; Roberts, C.T. Assessment of resistance of nasal continuous positive airway pressure interfaces. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2019; 104, pp. F535-F539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315838]
99. Biniwale, M.; Wertheimer, F. Decrease in delivery room intubation rates after use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room for resuscitation of very low birth weight infants. Resuscitation; 2017; 116, pp. 33-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.004]
100. van Vonderen, J.J.; Kamlin, C.O.; Dawson, J.A.; Walther, F.J.; Davis, P.G.; te Pas, A.B. Mask versus Nasal Tube for Stabilization of Preterm Infants at Birth: Respiratory Function Measurements. J. Pediatr.; 2015; 167, pp. 81-85.e1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.04.003]
101. Mani, S.; Pinheiro, J.M.B.; Rawat, M. Laryngeal Masks in Neonatal Resuscitation—A Narrative Review of Updates 2022. Children; 2022; 9, 733. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9050733]
102. Pejovic, N.J.; Myrnerts Höök, S.; Byamugisha, J.; Alfvén, T.; Lubulwa, C.; Cavallin, F.; Nankunda, J.; Ersdal, H.; Segafredo, G.; Blennow, M. et al. Neonatal resuscitation using a supraglottic airway device for improved mortality and morbidity outcomes in a low-income country: Study protocol for a randomized trial. Trials; 2019; 20, 444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3455-8]
103. Crawshaw, J.R.; Kitchen, M.J.; Binder-Heschl, C.; Thio, M.; Wallace, M.J.; Kerr, L.T.; Roehr, C.C.; Lee, K.L.; A Buckley, G.; Davis, P.G. et al. Laryngeal closure impedes non-invasive ventilation at birth. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2017; 103, pp. F112-F119. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-312681] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29054974]
104. Kuypers, K.L.A.M.; Lamberska, T.; Martherus, T.; Dekker, J.; Böhringer, S.; Hooper, S.B.; Plavka, R.; te Pas, A.B. The effect of a face mask for respiratory support on breathing in preterm infants at birth. Resuscitation; 2019; 144, pp. 178-184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.043] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31521774]
105. Kuypers, K.L.A.M.; Lamberska, T.; Martherus, T.; Dekker, J.; Böhringer, S.; Hooper, S.B.; Plavka, R.; te Pas, A.B. Comparing the effect of two different interfaces on breathing of preterm infants at birth: A matched-pairs analysis. Resuscitation; 2020; 157, pp. 60-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33075437]
106. Kaufmann, M.; Mense, L.; Springer, L.; Dekker, J. Tactile stimulation in the delivery room: Past, present, future. A systematic review. Pediatr. Res.; 2022; 5, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-01945-9]
107. Abdel-Hady, H. Humidification and heating of inspired gas during delivery room stabilization improves admission temperature in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr.; 2017; 106, 682. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13705]
108. Meyer, M.P.; Owen, L.S.; te Pas, A.B. Use of Heated Humidified Gases for Early Stabilization of Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Pediatr.; 2018; 6, 319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00319]
109. Stevens, T.P.; Finer, N.N.; Carlo, W.A.; Szilagyi, P.G.; Phelps, D.L.; Walsh, M.C.; Gantz, M.G.; Laptook, A.R.; Yoder, B.A.; Faix, R.G. et al. Respiratory Outcomes of the Surfactant Positive Pressure and Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT). J. Pediatr.; 2014; 165, pp. 240-249.e4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.054]
110. Dunn, M.S.; Kaempf, J.; de Klerk, A.; de Klerk, R.; Reilly, M.; Howard, D.; Ferrelli, K.; O’Conor, J.; Soll, R.F. Vermont Oxford Network DRM Study Group Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics; 2011; 128, pp. e1069-e1076. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3848]
111. Sandri, F.; Plavka, R.; Ancora, G.; Simeoni, U.; Stranak, Z.; Martinelli, S.; Mosca, F.; Nona, J.; Thomson, M.; Verder, H. et al. Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants. Pediatrics; 2010; 125, pp. e1402-e1409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2131]
112. Schmolzer, G.M.; Kumar, M.; Pichler, G.; Aziz, K.; O’Reilly, M.; Cheung, P.-Y. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ; 2013; 347, f5980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5980]
113. Fischer, H.S.; Bührer, C. Avoiding Endotracheal Ventilation to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics; 2013; 132, pp. e1351-e1360. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1880]
114. Abdel-Latif, M.E.; Davis, P.G.; Wheeler, K.I.; De Paoli, A.G.; Dargaville, P.A. Surfactant therapy via thin catheter in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.; 2021; 2021, CD011672. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011672.pub2]
115. Kusuda, S.; Nakanishi, H.; Oei, J.L. Practical procedures for the delivery room resuscitation of micropreemies. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med.; 2022; 27, 101349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2022.101349] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35654729]
116. Zeballos-Sarrato, S.; Villar-Castro, S.; Zeballos-Sarrato, G.; Ramos-Navarro, C.; González-Pacheco, N.; Sánchez Luna, M. Survival estimations at the limit of viability. J. Matern. -Fetal Neonatal Med.; 2016; 29, pp. 3660-3664. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2016.1140736]
117. Murthy, V.; D’Costa, W.; Shah, R.; Fox, G.F.; Campbell, M.E.; Milner, A.D.; Greenough, A. Prematurely born infants’ response to resuscitation via an endotracheal tube or a face mask. Early Hum. Dev.; 2015; 91, pp. 235-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.02.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25706318]
118. Bhat, P.; Hunt, K.; Harris, C.; Murthy, V.; Milner, A.D.; Greenough, A. Inflation pressures and times during initial resuscitation in preterm infants. Pediatr. Int.; 2017; 59, pp. 906-910. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ped.13319]
119. Lamberska, T.; Luksova, M.; Smisek, J.; Vankova, J.; Plavka, R. Premature infants born at <25 weeks of gestation may be compromised by currently recommended resuscitation techniques. Acta Paediatr.; 2016; 105, pp. e142-e150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13178]
120. Schmölzer, G.M.; Morley, C.J.; Wong, C.; Dawson, J.A.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Donath, S.M.; Hooper, S.B.; Davis, P.G. Respiratory function monitor guidance of mask ventilation in the delivery room: A feasibility study. J. Pediatr.; 2012; 160, pp. 377-381.e2. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.09.017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22056350]
121. van Zanten, H.A.; Kuypers, K.L.A.M.; van Zwet, E.W.; van Vonderen, J.J.; Kamlin, C.O.F.; Springer, L.; Lista, G.; Cavigioli, F.; Vento, M.; Núñez-Ramiro, A. et al. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of respiratory function monitoring during stabilisation of very preterm infants at birth. Resuscitation; 2021; 167, pp. 317-325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.07.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302924]
122. de Medeiros, S.M.; Mangat, A.; Polglase, G.R.; Sarrato, G.Z.; Davis, P.G.; Schmölzer, G.M. Respiratory function monitoring to improve the outcomes following neonatal resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.; 2022; 107, pp. 589-596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2021-323017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058279]
123. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) Home Page. Available online: https://www.ilcor.org/home (accessed on 14 February 2022).
124. Kuypers, K.L.A.M.; van Zanten, H.A.; Heesters, V.; Kamlin, O.; Springer, L.; Lista, G.; Cavigioli, F.; Vento, M.; Núñez-Ramiro, A.; Kuester, H. et al. Resuscitators’ opinions on using a respiratory function monitor during neonatal resuscitation. Acta Paediatr.; 2022; 112, pp. 63-68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.16559] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177808]
125. Finn, D.; Boylan, G.B.; Ryan, C.A.; Dempsey, E.M. Enhanced Monitoring of the Preterm Infant during Stabilization in the Delivery Room. Front. Pediatr.; 2016; 4, 30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2016.00030] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066463]
126. Kakkilaya, V.; Jubran, I.; Mashruwala, V.; Ramon, E.; Simcik, V.N.; Marshall, M.; Brown, L.S.; Jaleel, M.A.; Kapadia, V.S. Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Delivery Room Intubations in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics; 2019; 143, e20180201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-0201] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602545]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Zeballos-Sarrato, Gonzalo 2
; Gormaz-Moreno, María 1 ; Avila-Alvarez, Alejandro 3 ; Juan Diego Toledo-Parreño 1
; Vento, Máximo 1
1 Department of Neonatology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 106 Fernando Abril Martorell Avenue, 46026 Valencia, Spain
2 Department of Neonatology, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, 28009 Madrid, Spain
3 Division of Neonatology, Pediatric Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, 15006 A Coruña, Spain